Arizona
Arizona Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 13 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Arizona law sets the deadline to file a personal injury lawsuit at 2 years under A.R.S. 12-542, written contract claims at 6 years under A.R.S. 12-548, and oral contracts or fraud at 3 years under A.R.S. 12-543. Missing any deadline permanently bars the claim.
Hurt in Arizona? If you are still within the deadline above, you can estimate what your injury claim may be worth with our free Arizona personal injury settlement calculator. It gives an instant range based on your medical costs and Arizona's fault rule (general information, not legal advice).
What Is the Arizona Statute of Limitations?
The statute of limitations in Arizona is a set of laws that establish strict deadlines for filing lawsuits and criminal charges. These time limits exist to promote fairness by ensuring that legal actions are brought while evidence is still fresh and witnesses are available.
Arizona's civil statutes of limitations are found primarily in Title 12 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Criminal time limitations are governed by A.R.S. 13-107. Missing a filing deadline can permanently bar your claim, so understanding these time limits is essential for protecting your legal rights.
The clock typically starts running on the date the injury occurs, the breach happens, or the crime is committed. However, Arizona recognizes exceptions, including a discovery rule for cases where the harm was not immediately apparent.
Arizona Civil Statute of Limitations
Arizona's civil statute of limitations sets deadlines for filing lawsuits in state court. If you fail to file your claim before the deadline passes, the opposing party can file a motion to dismiss based on the expired statute of limitations. Once a court grants that motion, your legal claim is lost permanently.

The deadline that applies to your case depends on the type of claim you are bringing. Below is a comprehensive breakdown of Arizona's civil filing deadlines.
One-Year Limitations (A.R.S. 12-541)
The following civil actions must be filed within one year after the cause of action accrues:
- Malicious prosecution
- False imprisonment
- Libel or slander (defamation claims)
- Breach of employment contract
- Wrongful termination
- Liability created by statute (unless the statute itself specifies a different period)
Two-Year Limitations (A.R.S. 12-542)
These claims carry a two-year filing deadline:
- Personal injury (including car accidents, slip and fall, and assault)
- Wrongful death (2 years from the date of death)
- Medical malpractice (2 years from the date the injury is discovered or should have been discovered)
- Injury to personal property (damage to your belongings)
- Conversion of property (someone taking or using your property without permission)
- Trespass
- Forcible entry and forcible detainer
Three-Year Limitations (A.R.S. 12-543)
The following actions must be filed within three years:
- Oral contracts (debts or agreements not in writing)
- Open accounts (stated or open account between parties)
- Fraud (3 years from when the fraud is discovered or should have been discovered)
Four-Year Limitations (A.R.S. 12-544 and 12-550)
Arizona allows four years for these claim types:
- Foreign judgments (judgments from courts outside Arizona)
- Partnership accounts (disputes between partners)
- Sale of goods under the UCC (A.R.S. 47-2725 governs breach of contract for the sale of goods)
- Actions with no other specified deadline (A.R.S. 12-550 provides a general 4-year catch-all)
Six-Year Limitations (A.R.S. 12-548)
Written contract disputes carry the longest standard limitations period in Arizona:
- Written contracts for debt (6 years from the date of breach)
- Other written contracts (6 years)
Civil Statute of Limitations Summary Table
| Claim Type | Time Limit | Statute |
|---|---|---|
| Malicious Prosecution | 1 year | A.R.S. 12-541 |
| False Imprisonment | 1 year | A.R.S. 12-541 |
| Libel/Slander | 1 year | A.R.S. 12-541 |
| Wrongful Termination | 1 year | A.R.S. 12-541 |
| Breach of Employment Contract | 1 year | A.R.S. 12-541 |
| Personal Injury | 2 years | A.R.S. 12-542 |
| Wrongful Death | 2 years | A.R.S. 12-542 |
| Medical Malpractice | 2 years | A.R.S. 12-542 |
| Property Damage | 2 years | A.R.S. 12-542 |
| Trespass | 2 years | A.R.S. 12-542 |
| Fraud | 3 years | A.R.S. 12-543 |
| Oral Contracts | 3 years | A.R.S. 12-543 |
| Open Accounts / Debt on Account | 3 years | A.R.S. 12-543 |
| Foreign Judgments | 4 years | A.R.S. 12-544 |
| Sale of Goods (UCC) | 4 years | A.R.S. 47-2725 |
| General (no other statute applies) | 4 years | A.R.S. 12-550 |
| Written Contracts | 6 years | A.R.S. 12-548 |
Special Civil Limitations Periods
Several categories of civil claims have unique deadlines that fall outside the standard framework.
Claims Against Government Entities (A.R.S. 12-821)
Lawsuits against Arizona state or local government entities and public employees must be filed within one year after the cause of action accrues. Before filing suit, you must also submit a notice of claim within 180 days under A.R.S. 12-821.01. Failing to file the notice of claim on time will bar your lawsuit entirely, even if the one-year deadline has not yet passed.
Product Liability (A.R.S. 12-551)
Product liability claims follow the standard two-year personal injury deadline. However, Arizona imposes a statute of repose: no product liability action may be filed if the cause of action accrues more than 12 years after the product was first sold for use or consumption. Exceptions exist for claims based on manufacturer negligence or breach of an express warranty.
Construction Defects (A.R.S. 12-552)
Claims related to the design, engineering, or construction of improvements to real property must be filed within eight years after substantial completion of the improvement. If the injury is discovered during the eighth year, the claimant has one additional year to file, but no action may be brought more than nine years after substantial completion.
Arizona Criminal Statute of Limitations
Arizona's criminal statute of limitations, found in A.R.S. 13-107, sets deadlines for prosecutors to file criminal charges. These limits exist to protect individuals from facing charges for conduct that allegedly occurred in the distant past, when memories have faded and evidence may have been lost or degraded.
Crimes With No Statute of Limitations
Arizona law allows prosecution at any time for the following offenses:
- Homicide (including murder and manslaughter)
- Conspiracy to commit homicide resulting in a death
- Class 2 felony sexual offenses listed in Chapter 14 of Title 13 (including sexual assault, sexual conduct with a minor under 15, and molestation of a child)
- Violent sexual assault (A.R.S. 13-1423)
- Sexual exploitation of children (offenses under Chapter 35.1 of Title 13)
- Terrorism and organized crime offenses (A.R.S. 13-2308.01 and 13-2308.03)
- Commercial sexual exploitation (A.R.S. 13-3212)
- Misuse of public monies
- Felony involving falsification of public records
- Attempts to commit any of the above offenses
Standard Criminal Time Limits
For all other offenses, prosecution must begin within these time frames:
| Offense Classification | Time Limit |
|---|---|
| Class 2 through Class 6 Felony | 7 years |
| Misdemeanor | 1 year |
| Petty Offense | 6 months |
The clock starts when the state actually discovers the crime, or when the state should have discovered the crime through the exercise of reasonable diligence, whichever comes first.
Criminal Statute of Limitations Summary Table
| Crime Category | Time Limit | Statute |
|---|---|---|
| Murder / Manslaughter | No limit | A.R.S. 13-107(A) |
| Class 2 Felony Sex Offenses | No limit | A.R.S. 13-107(A) |
| Violent Sexual Assault | No limit | A.R.S. 13-107(A) |
| Sexual Exploitation of Children | No limit | A.R.S. 13-107(A) |
| Terrorism | No limit | A.R.S. 13-107(A) |
| Misuse of Public Funds | No limit | A.R.S. 13-107(A) |
| Falsifying Public Records (Felony) | No limit | A.R.S. 13-107(A) |
| Other Felonies (Class 2-6) | 7 years | A.R.S. 13-107(B) |
| Misdemeanors | 1 year | A.R.S. 13-107(B) |
| Petty Offenses | 6 months | A.R.S. 13-107(B) |
Tolling of the Criminal Statute of Limitations
Arizona law provides that the criminal statute of limitations may be extended (tolled) under certain circumstances. Under A.R.S. 13-107(D), the limitations period simply does not run for as long as the accused is absent from the state or has no reasonably ascertainable place of abode within Arizona, with no cap on how long that tolling can extend the deadline.
When Does the Clock Start? Understanding Accrual and Tolling
Knowing the deadline is only half the equation. Equally important is understanding when Arizona starts counting.

The Accrual Rule
For most civil claims, the statute of limitations begins to run (or "accrues") on the date the injury, breach, or wrongful act occurs. For criminal offenses, the clock begins when the crime is discovered or should have been discovered through reasonable diligence.
The Discovery Rule
Arizona recognizes a discovery rule for certain claims. When an injury is not immediately apparent, the statute of limitations does not begin until the injured party discovers the harm or reasonably should have discovered it. This rule is particularly important in cases involving:
- Fraud (A.R.S. 12-543 specifies that the limitations period begins upon discovery of the fraud)
- Medical malpractice (where the effects of negligent treatment may not surface for months or years)
- Product defects with latent injuries
Tolling for Minors and Incapacitated Persons (A.R.S. 12-502)
If the person entitled to bring a civil action is under 18 years old or of unsound mind at the time the cause of action accrues, the limitations period is tolled (paused) during the period of disability. The clock does not begin running until the minor turns 18 or the incapacitated person regains capacity. This protection applies to most civil claims, though certain exceptions exist for claims involving real property.
Tolling for Absence From the State
For both civil and criminal matters, Arizona may toll the statute of limitations when the defendant is absent from the state. In criminal cases, A.R.S. 13-107(D) suspends the limitations clock for the entire time the accused is absent from the state, with no statutory cap on how long that tolling can extend the deadline.
Practical Tips for Meeting Arizona Filing Deadlines
Missing a statute of limitations deadline in Arizona has permanent consequences. Here are some practical steps to protect your rights:
- Act quickly after an injury or dispute. Even if the deadline seems far away, evidence degrades and witnesses become harder to locate over time.
- Identify the correct statute. Different claim types have different deadlines. Filing under the wrong statute could mean your claim is time-barred.
- Watch for shorter government deadlines. If your claim involves a government entity, you must file a notice of claim within 180 days, well before the one-year lawsuit deadline.
- Consult an attorney early. An Arizona attorney can help identify which deadline applies to your situation and whether any tolling exceptions might extend your time.
- Document the date of discovery. If you did not discover your injury right away, keep records showing when you first learned about the harm. This evidence supports a discovery rule argument.
State laws related to filing lawsuits can change. While our goal is to provide the most current information available, consider consulting an Arizona attorney or conducting legal research of your own to verify the laws that apply to your situation.
Additional Reading: How long is a life sentence in Arizona?
More Arizona Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the statute of limitations for personal injury in Arizona?
Arizona gives you two years to file a personal injury lawsuit under A.R.S. 12-542. The clock typically starts on the date the injury occurs. If you do not file within two years, the court will almost certainly dismiss your case.
Is there a statute of limitations on murder in Arizona?
No. Under A.R.S. 13-107, there is no statute of limitations for homicide in Arizona. Prosecutors can file murder or manslaughter charges at any time, regardless of how many years have passed since the alleged crime.
How long do I have to sue for breach of contract in Arizona?
It depends on whether the contract was written or oral. Written contracts have a six-year statute of limitations under A.R.S. 12-548. Oral contracts carry a three-year deadline under A.R.S. 12-543. Contracts for the sale of goods under the UCC have a four-year limit under A.R.S. 47-2725.
Can the statute of limitations be extended in Arizona?
Yes. Arizona allows tolling (pausing) of the statute of limitations in certain situations. If the injured party is a minor under 18 or is of unsound mind, the limitations period is paused under A.R.S. 12-502. The discovery rule may also delay the start of the clock when an injury is not immediately apparent. For criminal cases, the statute simply stops running for as long as the accused is absent from the state, with no cap on how long that tolling can extend the deadline.
What is the deadline for suing a government entity in Arizona?
You must file a notice of claim within 180 days of the incident under A.R.S. 12-821.01, and the actual lawsuit must be filed within one year under A.R.S. 12-821. Missing the 180-day notice requirement will bar your claim even if the one-year period has not expired.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected Arizona's criminal tolling-for-absence rule: A.R.S. 13-107(D) suspends the limitations clock for the entire time the accused is absent from the state, with no three-year cap as the article previously stated in three places (Tolling section, Absence-From-State section, and the FAQ).
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 13 (Criminal Code), Chapter 1 (GENERAL PROVISIONS)
§ 13-107Time limitationsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A. A prosecution for any homicide, any conspiracy to commit homicide that results in the death of a person, any offense that is listed in chapter 14 or 35.1 of this title and that is a class 2 felony, any violent sexual assault pursuant to section 13-1423, any violation of section 13-2308.01, 13-2308.03 or 13-3212, any misuse of public monies or a felony involving falsification of public records or any attempt to commit an offense listed in this subsection may be commenced at any time. B. Except as otherwise provided in this section and sections 28-672, 28-1381 and 28-1382, prosecutions for other offenses must be commenced within the following periods after actual discovery by the state or the political subdivision having jurisdiction of the offense or discovery by the state or the political subdivision that should have occurred with the exercise of reasonable diligence, whichever first occurs: 1. For a class 2 through a class 6 felony, seven years. 2. For a misdemeanor, one year. 3. For a petty offense, six months. C. For the purposes of subsection B of this section, a prosecution is commenced when an indictment, information or complaint is filed. D.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 45 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Jackson (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2004, 208 Ariz. 56)“…hich the trial court based its ruling is *59 A.R.S. § 13-107(B). That statute provides that “prosecu…”
- Taylor v. Cruikshank (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2006, 214 Ariz. 40)“…to dismiss the indictment, arguing the limitation period in A.R.S. § 13-107(B) had expired and the state there…”
- State v. Aguilar (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2008, 218 Ariz. 25)“…t cases, this court has addressed the meaning and effect of A.R.S. § 13-107, the statute of limitations that applie…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 12 (Courts and Civil Proceedings), Chapter 5 (LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS), Article 3 (Personal Actions)
§ 12-542Injury to person; injury when death ensues; injury to property; conversion of property; forcible entry and forcible detainer; two year limitationIn forcecited in 11 of our articles
Except as provided in section 12-551 there shall be commenced and prosecuted within two years after the cause of action accrues, and not afterward, the following actions: 1. For injuries done to the person of another including causes of action for medical malpractice as defined in section 12-561. 2. For injuries done to the person of another when death ensues from such injuries, which action shall be considered as accruing at the death of the party injured. 3. For trespass for injury done to the estate or the property of another. 4. For taking or carrying away the goods and chattels of another. 5. For detaining the personal property of another and for converting such property to one's own use. 6. For forcible entry or forcible detainer, which action shall be considered as accruing at the commencement of the forcible entry or detainer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 497 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kenyon v. Hammer (Arizona Supreme Court 1984, 142 Ariz. 69)“…es at the date of death and is barred two years thereafter. A.R.S. § 12-542(2). Plaintiff argues that Count I of th…”
- Walk v. Ring (Arizona Supreme Court 2002, 202 Ariz. 310)“…rtant, if not irrelevant. 2 The text of A.R.S. § 12-542 reads in pertinent part as follows:…”
- Florez v. Sargeant (Arizona Supreme Court 1996, 185 Ariz. 521)“…informed Gomez of the two year statute of limitations under A.R.S. § 12-542 and that it was the position of the Dio…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights and HIPAA Rules, Arizona Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Arizona Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim
§ 12-543Oral debt; stated or open account; relief on ground of fraud or mistake; three year limitationIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
There shall be commenced and prosecuted within three years after the cause of action accrues, and not afterward, the following actions: 1. For debt where the indebtedness is not evidenced by a contract in writing. 2. Upon stated or open accounts other than such mutual and current accounts as concern the trade of merchandise between merchant and merchant, their factors or agents, but no item of a stated or open account shall be barred so long as any item thereof has been incurred within three years immediately prior to the bringing of an action thereon. 3. For relief on the ground of fraud or mistake, which cause of action shall not be deemed to have accrued until the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts constituting the fraud or mistake.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 165 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America (Arizona Supreme Court 1995, 182 Ariz. 586)“…eved party of the facts constituting the fraud or mistake." A.R.S. § 12-543(3). *592 This is that sort of case.…”
- Skydive Arizona, Inc. v. Hogue (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2015, 238 Ariz. 357)“…Circuit had already ruled that the analogous state law was A.R.S. § 12-543, Arizona’s fraud statute. The trial cou…”
- Woodward v. Chirco Const. Co., Inc. (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1984, 141 Ariz. 520)“…ading “Contract statutes versus tort statutes” (in Arizona, A.R.S. § 12-543 or A.R.S. § 12 — 548 versus A.R.S. § 12…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Debt Collection Laws: The 10% Garnishment Cap, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
§ 12-548Contract in writing for debt; six year limitation; choice of lawIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A. An action for debt shall be commenced and prosecuted within six years after the cause of action accrues, and not afterward, if the indebtedness is evidenced by or founded on either of the following: 1. A contract in writing that is executed in this state. 2. A credit card as defined in section 13-2101, paragraph 3, subdivision (a). B. If there is a conflict between another jurisdiction and this state relating to the statute of limitations for a debt action as described in subsection A of this section, this section applies.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 146 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Zuckerman v. Transamerica Insurance (Arizona Supreme Court 1982, 133 Ariz. 139)“…h ordinarily applies to actions on written contracts. See A.R.S. § 12-548; Eureka-Security Fire & Marine Insuran…”
- WJ Kroeger Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Company (Arizona Supreme Court 1975, 112 Ariz. 285)“…one-year limitation and therefore the applicable statute is A.R.S. § 12-548 providing for a six-year statute of lim…”
- Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Service, Inc. (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1978, 118 Ariz. 452)“…hat the obligation is barred by the statute of limitations (A.R.S. § 12-548). We agree with the appellant, and, the…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 12-541Malicious prosecution; false imprisonment; libel or slander; seduction or breach of promise of marriage; breach of employment contract; wrongful termination; liability created by statute; one year limitationIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
There shall be commenced and prosecuted within one year after the cause of action accrues, and not afterward, the following actions: 1. For malicious prosecution, or for false imprisonment, or for injuries done to the character or reputation of another by libel or slander. 2. For damages for seduction or breach of promise of marriage. 3. For breach of an oral or written employment contract including contract actions based on employee handbooks or policy manuals that do not specify a time period in which to bring an action. 4. For damages for wrongful termination. 5. Upon a liability created by statute, other than a penalty or forfeiture.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 204 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Alaface v. National Investment Co. (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1994, 181 Ariz. 586)“…nitiated within one year after the cause of action accrues. A.R.S. § 12-541(3); Murry v. Western Am. Mortgage Co.,…”
- Stewart v. Fahey (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1971, 14 Ariz. App. 149)“…relief were barred by the one-year statute of limitations (A.R.S. § 12-541) and that the filing of a lis pendens w…”
- Skydive Arizona, Inc. v. Hogue (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2015, 238 Ariz. 357)“…e barred by the one-year statute of limitations provided in A.R.S. § 12-541(5). Hogue contended that because the La…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Defamation Laws: Libel, Slander & Suing (2026)
§ 12-550General limitationIn force
Actions other than for recovery of real property for which no limitation is otherwise prescribed shall be brought within four years after the cause of action accrues, and not afterward.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 56 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Clark v. Airesearch Manufacturing Co. of Arizona, Inc. (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1983, 138 Ariz. 240)“…with contract instead of the four-year limitation period in A.R.S. § 12-550 and therefore find that these claims we…”
- Crook v. Anderson (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1977, 115 Ariz. 402)“…of action covered by our catch-all statute of limitations, A.R.S. § 12-550, providing a four-year statute of limit…”
- RANCH 57 v. City of Yuma (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1986, 152 Ariz. 218)“…uch as are presented by Ranch 57. Accordingly, we hold that A.R.S. § 12-550 is applicable to the instant case. A.R.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 12-544Bond to convey realty; partnership account; account between merchants; judgment or instrument given or made without the state; four year limitationIn force
There shall be commenced and prosecuted within four years after the cause of action accrues, and not afterward, the following actions: 1. For the penalty or for damages on the penal clause of a bond to convey real property. 2. By one partner against his copartner for a settlement of the partnership account, or upon mutual and current accounts concerning the trade of merchandise between merchant and merchant, their factors or agents, and the cause of action shall be considered as having accrued upon a cessation of the dealings in which they were interested together. 3. Upon a judgment or decree of a court rendered without the state, or upon an instrument in writing executed without the state. This paragraph does not apply to a judgment for support, as defined in section 25-500, and to associated costs and attorney fees. 4. An action arising under the provisions of title 47, chapter 2, for breach of any contract of sale, which action shall be governed by section 47-2725, notwithstanding any other provision of this section or of section 12-543 or 12-548.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 30 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Evans (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1981, 130 Ariz. 333)“…eclaratory action is not barred by the limitation period of A.R.S. § 12-544. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED,…”
- Eschenhagen v. Zika (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1985, 144 Ariz. 213)“…for enforcing judgments rendered in other states, found in A.R.S. § 12-544(3). Clearly if appellee had brought an…”
- Grynberg v. Shaffer (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2007, 216 Ariz. 256)“…agree that the four-year statute of limitations provided by A.R.S. § 12-544(3) (2003) applies to the filing of fore…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 12-551Product liabilityIn force
A product liability action as defined in section 12-681 shall be commenced and prosecuted within the period prescribed in section 12-542, except that no product liability action may be commenced and prosecuted if the cause of action accrues more than twelve years after the product was first sold for use or consumption, unless the cause of action is based upon the negligence of the manufacturer or seller or a breach of an express warranty provided by the manufacturer or seller.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 21 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp. (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1991, 168 Ariz. 301)“…ctions were barred by the twelve-year limitations period of A.R.S. § 12-551, Arizona’s “statute of repose” for prod…”
- Hazine v. Montgomery Elevator Co. (Arizona Supreme Court 1993, 176 Ariz. 340)“…ed for summary judgment on the strict liability claim under A.R.S. § 12-551, which provides: A product liability…”
- Bryant v. Continental Conveyor & Equipment Co. (Arizona Supreme Court 1988, 156 Ariz. 193)“…ant’s strict liability claim is barred by the provisions of A.R.S. § 12-551. That statute, in conjunction with §§ 1…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 12-552Actions involving development of real property design, engineering and construction of improvementsIn force
A. Notwithstanding any other statute, an action or arbitration based in contract may not be instituted or maintained against a person who develops or develops and sells real property, or performs or furnishes the design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision, testing, construction or observation of construction of an improvement to real property more than eight years after substantial completion of the improvement to real property. B. Notwithstanding any other statute, a municipality or a county may not institute or maintain an action or arbitration against a person who develops or develops and sells real property or performs or furnishes the design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision, testing, construction or observation of construction of an improvement to real property that is dedicated to the municipality or county more than eight years after the improvement to real property has been accepted by the municipality or county for ownership, operation and maintenance if the action or arbitration is based on either: 1. A municipal or county code, ordinance or other legal requirement. 2. A permit that is required as a condition of development. C.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 25 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Evans Withycombe, Inc. v. Western Innovations, Inc. (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2006, 215 Ariz. 237)“…2 of the improvement to real property. A.R.S. § 12-552(A). If an injury or latent defect is di…”
- Maycock v. Asilomar Development, Inc. (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2004, 207 Ariz. 495)“…on the basis that the claims of the Maycocks were barred by A.R.S. § 12-552. This statute precludes contract and im…”
- Sullivan v. Pulte Home Corp. (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2012, 231 Ariz. 53)“…plied warranty claim by the construction statute of repose, A.R.S. § 12-552 (2003). The Sullivans respond with thre…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 47 (Uniform Commercial Code), Chapter 2 (SALES), Article 7 (Remedies)
§ 47-2725Statute of limitations in contracts for saleIn force
A. An action for breach of any contract for sale must be commenced within four years after the cause of action has accrued. By the original agreement the parties may reduce the period of limitation to not less than one year but may not extend it. B. A cause of action accrues when the breach occurs, regardless of the aggrieved party's lack of knowledge of the breach. A breach of warranty occurs when tender of delivery is made, except that where a warranty explicitly extends to future performance of the goods and discovery of the breach must await the time of such performance the cause of action accrues when the breach is or should have been discovered. C. Where an action commenced within the time limited by subsection A is so terminated as to leave available a remedy by another action for the same breach such other action may be commenced after the expiration of the time limited and within six months after the termination of the first action unless the termination resulted from voluntary discontinuance or from dismissal for failure or neglect to prosecute. D.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 9 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Gates v. LaBelle's Distribution of Arizona, Inc. (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1985, 147 Ariz. 23)“…ns provision for breach of contract actions as set forth in A.R.S. § 47-2725. On October 16, 1978 the appellants (…”
- Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America (Arizona Supreme Court 1995, 182 Ariz. 586)“…s under any particular statute of limitations. See, e.g., A.R.S. § 47-2725(B) (1988) (A cause of action for breach…”
- BASELINE FINANCIAL SERVICES v. Madison (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2012, 229 Ariz. 543)“…y, a cause of action accrues when the contract is breached. A.R.S. § 47-2725(B). When an installment contract contai…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 12 (Courts and Civil Proceedings), Chapter 7 (SPECIAL ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS IN WHICH THE STATE IS A PARTY), Article 2 (Actions Against Public Entities or Public Employees)
§ 12-821General limitation; public employeeIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
All actions against any public entity or public employee shall be brought within one year after the cause of action accrues and not afterward.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 226 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dube v. Likins (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2007, 216 Ariz. 406)“…ded complaint, and the claim was untimely. ¶ 7 Under A.R.S. § 12-821, “[a]U actions against any public entit…”
- Grimm v. Arizona Board of Pardons & Paroles (Arizona Supreme Court 1977, 115 Ariz. 260)“…1. Does appellants’ failure to fulfill the requirements of A.R.S. § 12-821 preclude this suit? 2. Do the Arizona…”
- Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. Houser (Arizona Supreme Court 2007, 214 Ariz. 293)“…10 § 12-821 (1956)). Because A.R.S. § 12-821 did not, “by its terms, define what co…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability
§ 12-821.01Authorization of claim against public entity, public school or public employeeIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
A. Persons who have claims against a public entity, public school or a public employee shall file claims with the person or persons authorized to accept service for the public entity, public school or public employee as set forth in the Arizona rules of civil procedure within one hundred eighty days after the cause of action accrues. The claim shall contain facts sufficient to permit the public entity, public school or public employee to understand the basis on which liability is claimed. The claim shall also contain a specific amount for which the claim can be settled and the facts supporting that amount. Any claim that is not filed within one hundred eighty days after the cause of action accrues is barred and no action may be maintained thereon. B. For the purposes of this section, a cause of action accrues when the damaged party realizes he or she has been damaged and knows or reasonably should know the cause, source, act, event, instrumentality or condition that caused or contributed to the damage. C.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 318 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dube v. Likins (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2007, 216 Ariz. 406)“…n wMch caused or contributed to the damage.” 1 A.R.S. § 12-821.01(B); see also Long v. City of Gle…”
- Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. Houser (Arizona Supreme Court 2007, 214 Ariz. 293)“…t) received a “claim letter” sent pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-821.01 from McDonald.…”
- Falcon Ex Rel. Sandoval v. Maricopa County (Arizona Supreme Court 2006, 213 Ariz. 525)“…r medical malpractice. ¶ 4 Attempting to comply with A.R.S. § 12-821.01(A), the plaintiffs sent a notice of cla…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 12 (Courts and Civil Proceedings), Chapter 5 (LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS), Article 1 (General Provisions)
§ 12-502Effect of minority or insanityIn force
If a person entitled to bring an action other than those set forth in article 2 of this chapter is at the time the cause of action accrues either under eighteen years of age or of unsound mind, the period of such disability shall not be deemed a portion of the period limited for commencement of the action. Such person shall have the same time after removal of the disability which is allowed to others.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 89 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Doe v. Roe (Arizona Supreme Court 1998, 191 Ariz. 313)“…erefore did not begin to run until her eighteenth birthday. A.R.S. § 12-502. Plaintiff did not file her claim withi…”
- Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co. (Arizona Supreme Court 1984, 143 Ariz. 101)“…loss of intellectual function. The filing was timely under Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 12-502, the general tolling statute that cover…”
- Florez v. Sargeant (Arizona Supreme Court 1996, 185 Ariz. 521)“…ed because (1) he was of unsound mind within the meaning of A.R.S. § 12-502, (2) he was under duress, (3) his memor…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- A.R.S. 12-541 - One Year Limitations(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. 12-542 - Two Year Limitations (Personal Injury, Wrongful Death, Property)(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. 12-543 - Three Year Limitations (Oral Debt, Fraud)(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. 12-544 - Four Year Limitations (Foreign Judgments, Partnership Accounts)(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. 12-548 - Six Year Limitation (Written Contracts)(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. 12-550 - General Four Year Limitation(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. 12-551 - Product Liability Statute of Repose(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. 12-552 - Construction Defect Limitations(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. 12-821 - Government Entity Claims (One Year Limitation)(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. 12-821.01 - Notice of Claim Requirement (180 Days)(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. 12-502 - Tolling for Minors and Incapacitated Persons(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. 13-107 - Criminal Time Limitations(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. 47-2725 - UCC Statute of Limitations for Sale of Goods(azleg.gov).gov