Georgia
Georgia Public Records Laws: The Georgia Open Records Act Explained
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 4, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Georgia's Open Records Act, O.C.G.A. 50-18-70 through 50-18-77, runs one of the shortest response clocks in the country: an agency has 3 business days to produce responsive records. It is also explicitly open to requesters who live outside Georgia, a point the 2012 rewrite of the Act settled deliberately.
Information last verified on 2026-08-04. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
This page covers Georgia state law only. For records held by a federal agency, see our guide on how to file a FOIA request. To compare Georgia against other states, start at the public records laws by state hub.
The Georgia Open Records Act
The Georgia Open Records Act, codified at O.C.G.A. 50-18-70 through 50-18-77, governs access to records held by state agencies, counties, cities, school districts, boards of education, authorities, and other public agencies, along with private entities performing services on behalf of a public office.
The Act's central command is in O.C.G.A. 50-18-71(a): all public records shall be open for personal inspection and copying, except those which by order of a court of this state or by law are specifically exempted from disclosure. The presumption runs toward disclosure, and the burden of establishing an exemption sits with the agency.
Georgia does not call this law FOIA. It is a state statute and it does not reach federal agencies. A request for federal records goes to the federal agency under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Georgia's Open Records Act has a companion, the Open Meetings Act at O.C.G.A. 50-14-1 and following. Records and meetings are separate statutes with separate remedies, and both are covered in the Attorney General's published guidance on open government.
Out-of-State Requesters Are Covered
This is worth stating plainly because Georgia sits next door to states that handle it differently, and the question comes up constantly.
Georgia's Open Records Act contains no residency requirement. The Attorney General's official guidance on the Act states that the amendments to the law make clear that the right of access extends to individuals outside the state, referring to O.C.G.A. 50-18-71(a).
So a journalist in New York, a researcher in California, or a company in Illinois may file a Georgia open records request on exactly the same terms as an Atlanta resident. That is the opposite of Kentucky, which limits the right of inspection to residents of the Commonwealth, and different again from Idaho, which admits everyone but gives non-residents a slower clock.
Georgia also does not require you to state a purpose for an ordinary request. A separate provision does restrict the use of records obtained for certain commercial solicitation purposes, but that is a limit on downstream use rather than a purpose test on the request itself.
Georgia's 3-Business-Day Deadline
Georgia's timing rule is one of the tightest in the country, and it is structured differently from most states' deadlines.
Under O.C.G.A. 50-18-71(b)(1)(A), agencies shall produce for inspection all records responsive to a request within a reasonable amount of time not to exceed three business days of receipt of a request. Note the verb. This is not merely a deadline to acknowledge, or to decide whether to comply. It is framed around production.
The Act then handles the realistic case where three days is not enough. If responsive records exist but are not available within three business days, the agency must, within that same three-business-day window, provide a written description of the records and a timetable for their inspection and production, and then produce them as soon as practicable.
That second rule is the one to hold an agency to. A Georgia agency that goes silent past day three is out of compliance even if the records genuinely take weeks to gather, because the statute required it to send you a description and a timetable inside the window. When you follow up, ask specifically for the description and timetable the Act requires rather than just asking where your records are. These provisions are current as of August 2026.
Read against Florida and Iowa, both of which have no numeric deadline at all, Georgia's rule is a substantial advantage for requesters.
What Georgia Records Requests Cost
Georgia bills labor and copies separately, and the labor formula is unusually favorable to requesters.
Search, retrieval, and redaction time is charged at the prorated hourly salary of the lowest-paid full-time employee who, in the reasonable discretion of the custodian, has the necessary skill and training to perform the request. The first 15 minutes of that work is free. The lowest-paid-competent-employee rule matters: it means an agency cannot bill a department head's salary or an attorney's rate for work a records clerk could have done.
Copies are capped at 10 cents per page for letter-size or legal-size documents. For records provided on electronic media, the charge is the actual cost of the media.
Georgia has no blanket public-interest fee waiver of the kind the federal FOIA provides. Readers frequently assume one exists. There is, however, an important limit from Georgia case law cited in the Attorney General's guidance: no fee may be charged for mere inspection of records that are routinely subject to public inspection, such as deeds, ordinances, and zoning maps.
Two further limits are worth knowing because agencies do not always volunteer them. Under O.C.G.A. 50-18-71(c)(1), the charge for search, retrieval, or redaction cannot exceed the prorated hourly salary of the lowest-paid full-time employee who has the necessary skill and training to do the work, so an agency cannot bill you at an attorney's rate for tasks a lower-paid records clerk could perform. And where records are produced electronically, O.C.G.A. 50-18-71(c)(2) limits the agency's charge to the actual cost of the media on which the records are produced, which means an emailed PDF, involving no physical media, should not carry paper-copy pricing.
The Act also requires an agency to provide copies by the most economical means available, and it is the agency's burden to demonstrate that a charge meets that standard.
There is a duty running the other way too, and it is the one agencies most often skip. Where the estimated cost of search, retrieval, redaction, and production exceeds $25, the agency must notify you of that estimate within 3 business days, and it may defer any further work until you agree to pay. The Georgia Department of Public Safety's published charging policy follows exactly that structure, deferring production tasks until the requester agrees to the estimate and requiring prepayment on larger ones. So a surprise invoice at the end is not how this is meant to work. If a request is substantial and no estimate arrives inside three business days, ask for it by name.
That gives you three practical cost levers. Ask to inspect rather than to receive copies when you only need to review material. Ask for electronic delivery. And keep the request narrow enough to stay near the free first 15 minutes of labor, since requesting a specific document by name and date almost always beats requesting a category. Ask for a cost estimate up front on anything substantial.
How to File a Georgia Open Records Request
Georgia has no central portal. Requests go to the agency's designated open records officer, if it has designated one, or to the custodian.
- Identify the agency. County, city, sheriff's office, school district, and state agency records are held separately.
- Check whether the agency has designated an open records officer. Georgia agencies may designate one and publish the contact, and requests sent to that person start the clock cleanly.
- Put the request in writing. This is not a style preference in Georgia. O.C.G.A. 50-18-71(b)(3) makes the enforcement provisions of O.C.G.A. 50-18-73 and 50-18-74 available only for written requests, so an oral request that an agency ignores leaves you with no civil action, no attorney fees, and no penalty exposure. Oral requests are allowed; they are simply unenforceable.
- Describe the records specifically. Precision drives both speed and cost here, since labor is billed by the hour beyond the first 15 minutes.
- Ask for an estimate before work begins.
- Diary the third business day. If nothing arrives, follow up citing O.C.G.A. 50-18-71(b)(1)(A) and ask for the written description and timetable the Act requires.
Our free FOIA request generator produces a Georgia-specific request letter citing the Open Records Act. Nothing entered into it is stored or transmitted.
Exemptions Under the Georgia Open Records Act
Georgia's exemptions live mainly in O.C.G.A. 50-18-72, which enumerates a long list of records not subject to disclosure. The list includes records of pending investigations and prosecutions, certain law enforcement records, medical records, individual personnel evaluations, trade secrets, records that would disclose the identity of confidential sources, certain security plans and infrastructure records, and materials made confidential by other state or federal law.
Two Georgia-specific features are worth knowing. The pending-investigation exemption has a built-in carve-out: initial police arrest reports and initial incident reports remain public even while an investigation is ongoing. That is a meaningful right, and it is the answer when an agency tries to withhold the basic incident paperwork on the theory that the case is open.
And, as everywhere, exemptions apply to information rather than to whole files. An agency must redact exempt material and produce the rest, and it must identify the statutory basis for each redaction.
Police Records and Body Camera Footage
Georgia's Open Records Act does not contain a body-camera-specific access scheme equivalent to Kansas's K.S.A. 45-254 or Kentucky's KRS 61.168. There is no statutory list of who may view footage and no dedicated footage timeline. Recordings are handled through the general law enforcement analysis under O.C.G.A. 50-18-72(a)(4), the pending investigation or prosecution exemption.
The Attorney General's published guide for Georgia law enforcement states the position directly, and it is more useful than most states' guidance because it admits what is unsettled. Police in-car camera and body camera recordings in closed cases are subject to the Act's disclosure requirements. Georgia appellate courts have not determined whether such recordings are open records before a case is closed.
So there are really two situations. If the case is closed, the recording is a disclosable record and an agency that refuses is on weak ground. If the case is open, the answer is genuinely unresolved in Georgia law, and an agency asserting the pending-investigation exemption is making an argument no Georgia appellate court has yet accepted or rejected. Knowing that the question is open is what lets you push back on a denial that is presented as settled.
Two other law enforcement rules pair with this. Initial incident and police arrest reports are subject to disclosure regardless of whether they are part of an active investigation, and so is any report labeled supplemental or narrative that functions as the initial report. Those documents typically give you the date, time, location, officers involved, and incident numbers needed to make a precise later request for footage. Separately, reports relating to investigations of family violence are not released under the Act unless an arrest has been made in the incident.
Because access to footage in an open case is unsettled, request it in writing immediately and ask the agency to preserve the recording pending your request. Retention of the file is what determines whether the legal question ever gets to matter.
For 911 audio and dispatch records, which are analyzed separately from body camera footage, see our page on whether 911 calls are public records.
Appealing a Denial in Georgia
Georgia gives you a mediation option and a courthouse. It does not give you a binding administrative appeal.
Attorney General Mediation
The Attorney General's Office operates an informal Open Government Mediation Program that attempts to resolve disputes without litigation. Three limits are important and are frequently misunderstood:
- It is informal rather than adjudicative. The office describes it as a mediation, which means it works toward a resolution the parties accept rather than an order the agency must follow.
- The Attorney General's office is not acting as your counsel. Mediating a dispute is a different role from representing a party to it.
- Its practical focus has been disputes with local governments. Confirm with the office whether your particular dispute falls inside the program's current scope before you rely on it.
Within those limits, mediation is worth trying. It costs nothing, it is fast compared to litigation, and a call from the Attorney General's office resolves a large share of local disputes that a private letter would not.
Civil Action
Under O.C.G.A. 50-18-73, any person, firm, corporation, or other entity may bring a civil action in superior court to enforce the Act, and the Attorney General may also bring an action in his or her discretion. The court can order the agency to produce the records and can award attorney fees and litigation costs.
Georgia backs this with penalties, and O.C.G.A. 50-18-74 runs them on two tracks that are easy to blur together.
A knowing and willful violation is criminal. It is a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 for a first violation. A negligent violation is not criminal at all; it carries a civil penalty of up to $1,000 for a first violation. On either track, an additional violation committed within 12 months from the date the first penalty or fine was imposed carries up to $2,500. The Attorney General may bring civil or criminal enforcement action.
That 12-month clock is worth reading precisely. It does not run from the date of the first violation. It runs from the date the first penalty or fine was imposed, which is a later and often much later date.
The penalty structure is a lever in correspondence, not just in court. An agency's counsel understands that a documented pattern of ignored requests inside a 12-month window escalates the exposure per violation.
Records the Open Records Act Does Not Reach
Birth, death, and marriage certificates are vital records held by the Georgia Department of Public Health's State Office of Vital Records, under a separate statutory scheme with eligibility limits on who may obtain a certified copy. They are not open records requests. Our Georgia death records guide covers who qualifies.
Deeds and land records are held by the clerk of superior court in each county, covered in our Georgia property records guide. Court case files and warrants are court records rather than agency records; see Georgia warrant search.
Related articles
Disclaimer
This article provides general legal information about the Georgia Open Records Act as of August 2026. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes, fee rules, and agency procedures change. If a public records dispute affects your legal rights, consult an attorney licensed in Georgia about your specific situation.
Last updated: 2026-08-04.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can someone outside Georgia file a Georgia open records request?
Yes. The Act contains no residency requirement, and the Attorney General's official guidance states that the amendments to the law make clear the right of access extends to individuals outside the state. An out-of-state requester has the same rights as a Georgia resident.
How long does a Georgia agency have to respond?
Three business days. Under O.C.G.A. 50-18-71(b)(1)(A) agencies shall produce for inspection all responsive records within a reasonable amount of time not to exceed three business days of receipt of a request. If the records cannot all be produced in that window, the agency must within those three business days provide a written description of the responsive records and a timetable, and then produce them as soon as practicable.
What if the agency says three days is not enough time?
That is contemplated by the statute, but it does not excuse silence. The agency still has to act within the three-business-day window by sending you a description of the responsive records and a timetable for producing them. If you get nothing at all by day three, ask specifically for the description and timetable the Act requires.
Can I make a Georgia open records request orally?
You can, but you give up your remedies by doing it. O.C.G.A. 50-18-71(b)(3) makes the enforcement provisions in O.C.G.A. 50-18-73 and 50-18-74 available only for written requests. An oral request an agency ignores leaves you with no civil action, no attorney fees, and no penalty exposure to point at. Put anything you might need to enforce in writing.
How much can Georgia charge for copies?
Up to 10 cents per page for letter-size or legal-size documents, and the actual cost of the media for records provided electronically. Search, retrieval, and redaction time is billed separately at the prorated hourly salary of the lowest-paid full-time employee competent to do the work, with the first 15 minutes free.
Can Georgia charge me just to look at records?
Georgia case law cited in the Attorney General's guidance holds that no fee may be charged for mere inspection of records that are routinely subject to public inspection, such as deeds, ordinances, and zoning maps. Asking to inspect rather than to receive copies is a legitimate way to control cost when you only need to review material.
Is there a public-interest fee waiver in Georgia?
Georgia has no blanket public-interest waiver of the kind the federal FOIA provides. The cost protections are the 10-cent copy cap, the lowest-paid-competent-employee labor rule, and the free first 15 minutes of labor. An agency may reduce charges at its discretion, so asking costs nothing.
Can I get a police report while the investigation is still open?
In many cases yes. Georgia's pending investigation exemption carries a carve-out for initial police arrest reports and initial incident reports, which remain public even while an investigation is ongoing. That is different from the underlying investigative file, which can be withheld while the matter is pending.
Can I get police body camera footage in Georgia?
It depends heavily on whether the case is closed. The Attorney General's guide for Georgia law enforcement states that in-car camera and body camera recordings in closed cases are subject to the Act's disclosure requirements, and that Georgia appellate courts have not determined whether such recordings are open records before a case is closed. So a closed-case denial is on weak ground, while an open-case denial rests on an unsettled question under O.C.G.A. 50-18-72(a)(4). Request footage in writing immediately and ask the agency to preserve the recording.
Can I get a family violence report in Georgia?
Reports relating to investigations of family violence are not released under the Open Records Act unless an arrest has been made in the incident. That is narrower than the general pending-investigation rule, so the initial-report carve-out does not open these up in the same way.
Can I appeal a Georgia denial to the Attorney General?
Not in the sense of a binding administrative appeal. The Attorney General's office runs an informal Open Government Mediation Program, described as a mediation rather than an adjudication, so it works toward a resolution the parties accept rather than an order the agency must follow, and mediating a dispute is a different role from representing you in it. Its practical focus has been disputes with local governments, so confirm the current scope with the office before relying on it. It is worth trying because it is free and fast, but it does not produce an enforceable order the way an Illinois Public Access Counselor binding opinion can.
What can a court do if I sue under the Open Records Act?
Under O.C.G.A. 50-18-73 any person, firm, corporation, or other entity may bring a civil action in superior court, and the court can order production and award attorney fees and litigation costs. O.C.G.A. 50-18-74 splits penalties in two. A knowing and willful violation is a criminal misdemeanor carrying a fine of up to $1,000 for a first violation, while a negligent violation carries a civil penalty of up to $1,000 for a first violation. On either track, an additional violation within 12 months from the date the first penalty or fine was imposed carries up to $2,500.
Do I have to say why I want the records?
No. Georgia does not impose a purpose test on an ordinary request. A separate provision restricts using records obtained under the Act for certain commercial solicitation, but that limits downstream use rather than your right to request.
Can I get a Georgia death certificate through an open records request?
No. Vital records are held by the Georgia Department of Public Health's State Office of Vital Records under a separate statutory scheme with eligibility limits on who may obtain a certified copy.
Updates
Corrected two fee claims that did not match the actual text of O.C.G.A. 50-18-71. The statute does not say attorney review time is categorically non-billable; it caps the search/retrieval/redaction charge at the lowest-paid qualified employee's rate, which can still be an attorney's rate if only an attorney has the necessary skill and training. It also does not use a "directly attributable to providing access" standard for electronic records; it limits the charge to "the actual cost of the media" on which the records are produced, which in practice still means an emailed PDF should not carry paper-copy pricing.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Official Code of Georgia Annotated
§ 50-18-71Right of access; timing; fees; denial of requests; impact of electronic records.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a)(1) All public records shall be open for personal inspection and copying, except those which by order of a court of this state or by law are specifically exempted from disclosure. Records shall be maintained by agencies to the extent and in the manner required by Article 5 of this chapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.ga.gov
Cited in 50 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):McFrugal Rental of Riverdale, Inc. v. Garr (1992) held OCGA 50-18-71 must be narrowly construed, bars an inspection fee when a citizen seeks only to inspect routinely public records, and puts the burden of justifying a fee on the custodian. Campaign for Accountability (2018) held ORA exemptions permit, not prohibit, disclosure.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Deal v. Coleman (Supreme Court of Georgia 2013, 294 Ga. 170)✓Rejected Kia job applicants sought state hiring records; reading the Open Records Act's access provisions, including 50-18-71(a), the court held the right of access is a public right that cannot vest in a requester, so a new exemption applied to their pending suit.
- McFrugal Rental of Riverdale, Inc. v. Garr (Supreme Court of Georgia 1992, 262 Ga. 369)✓A company asked to inspect city council minutes, zoning maps and ordinances, and the city demanded an hourly supervision fee; the court read 50-18-71 narrowly, holding no fee may be charged for inspecting routinely public records and that the custodian must justify any fee.
- Schick v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2015, 334 Ga. App. 425)✓A student editor sought records on college layoffs; the trial court fined the Board $1,000 for withholding records without citing the specific exemption by Code section as 50-18-71(d) requires, a ruling left undisturbed while the appeal turned on a different exemption.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia Supreme Court Holds Autopsy Photographs Are Confidential Under the Open Records Act, Are Autopsy Reports Public in Georgia? (2026 Guide)
§ 50-18-72When public disclosure not required.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) Public disclosure shall not be required for records that are: (1) Specifically required by federal statute or regulation to be kept confidential; (2) Medical or veterinary records and similar files, the disclosure of which would be an invasion of personal privacy; (3) Except as otherwise prov
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.ga.gov
Cited in 85 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Napper v. Georgia Television Co. (1987) applied O.C.G.A. 50-18-72(a)'s medical-records exemption only where disclosure would invade privacy, balancing privacy against the public interest; Deal v. Coleman (2013) held the (a)(47) exemption applies retroactively because Open Records access is a public right that cannot vest.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Deal v. Coleman (Supreme Court of Georgia 2013, 294 Ga. 170)✓Requesters sought Technical College System records on Kia's hiring under the Quick Start program; the court held the section 50-18-72(a)(47) exception for records relating to job applicants is not limited to the period before a binding commitment and applied to their suit.
- Napper v. Georgia Television Co. (Supreme Court of Georgia 1987, 257 Ga. 156)✓News organizations sought the Atlanta Child Murders task force files, sealed in a vault after the task force disbanded; the court held that once trial, direct appeal and certiorari are done the file is open, and the party opposing disclosure must show an item is exempt.
- Dortch v. Atlanta Journal & Atlanta Constitution (Supreme Court of Georgia 1991, 261 Ga. 350)✓Atlanta newspapers sought the city's 1990 cellular phone bills, which officials produced with every called number redacted for privacy; the court measured section 50-18-72(a)(2) by the invasion of privacy tort and affirmed the order to hand over unredacted bills.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia Police Bodycam Laws: Retention & Open Records Rules, Georgia Police Reports: How to Get a Crash Report or Incident Report, How to Request Body Cam Footage: State Laws and the Request Process
§ 50-18-73Jurisdiction to enforce article; attorney's fees and litigation expenses; good faith reliance as defense to action.In force
(a) The superior courts of this state shall have jurisdiction in law and in equity to entertain actions against persons or agencies having custody of records open to the public under this article to enforce compliance with the provisions of this article.…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-08-17 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 57 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Deal v. Coleman (Supreme Court of Georgia 2013, 294 Ga. 170)“…ought by any person, firm, corporation, or other entity,” OCGA § 50-18-73 (a) (2012) (emphasis supplied), and the…”
- Blalock v. Cartwright (Supreme Court of Georgia 2017, 300 Ga. 884)“…the Act provides its own cause of action for enforcement in OCGA § 50-18-73 (a), that provision is plainly a “compl…”
- Wallace v. Greene County (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2005, 274 Ga. App. 776)“…fees brought against Greene County and Lombard pursuant to OCGA § 50-18-73 (b). As an initial matter, all o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 50-18-74Penalty for violations; procedure for commencement of prosecution.In force
(a) Any person or entity knowingly and willfully violating the provisions of this article by failing or refusing to provide access to records not subject to exemption from this article, by knowingly and willingly failing or refusing to provide access to such records within the time limits set forth…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-08-17 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Matthew Charles Cardinale v. Tim Keane (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2022)“…tion brought pursuant to [this Act.]” (Emphasis supplied.) OCGA § 50-18-74 (a); compare OCGA § 50-14-6. The only t…”
- Jenna Marie Garland v. State of Georgia (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2021)“…ry instructions. Finally, Garland 1 See OCGA § 50-18-74 (a). argues that the trial court erred…”
- Deal v. Coleman (Supreme Court of Georgia 2013, 294 Ga. 170)“…and a knowing and willful violation of the Act was a crime. OCGA § 50-18-74 (a). Moreover, consistent with the stat…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 50-18-70Legislative intent; definitions.In forcecited in 6 of our articles
(a) The General Assembly finds and declares that the strong public policy of this state is in favor of open government; that open government is essential to a free, open, and democratic society; and that public access to public records should be encouraged to foster confidence in government and so t
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.ga.gov
Cited in 173 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Deal v. Coleman (Supreme Court of Georgia 2013, 294 Ga. 170)“…reference to their membership in the People. 18 See, e.g., OCGA §§ 50-18-70 (b) (2012) (public records “shall be op…”
- Smith v. Northside Hospital, Inc. (Supreme Court of Georgia 2017, 302 Ga. 517)“…92, pp. 1061, 1064, § 5 (codified at prior *521 version of OCGA § 50-18-70 (a)). In 1999, the legislature amended…”
- Dortch v. Atlanta Journal & Atlanta Constitution (Supreme Court of Georgia 1991, 261 Ga. 350)“…"city"). In May of 1990, pursuant to the Open Records Act, OCGA § 50-18-70 et seq. (the "act"), appellees, The Atl…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia Laws on Recording Police: Your First Amendment Rights (2026), Georgia Laws on Recording in Public: What Is Legal (2026), Georgia Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Audio, All-Party Video
§ 50-14-1Meetings to be open to public; limitation on action to contest agency action; recording; notice of time and place; access to minutes; teleconference.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) As used in this chapter, the term: (1) "Agency" means: (A) Every state department, agency, board, bureau, office, commission, public corporation, and authority; (B) Every county, municipal corporation, school district, or other political subdivision of this state; (C) Every department, agenc
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.ga.gov
Cited in 98 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- WILLIAMS v. DEKALB COUNTY (Supreme Court of Georgia 2020, 308 Ga. 265)“…the commissioners for violating the Open Meetings Act, see OCGA § 50-14-1 et seq., before passing the salary ord…”
- Lue, Mayor v. Eady (Supreme Court of Georgia 2015)“…ries: alleged violations of the Georgia Open Meetings Act, OCGA § 50-14-1, et seq. (“Act”); alleged violations o…”
- Red & Black Publishing Co. v. Board of Regents (Supreme Court of Georgia 1993, 262 Ga. 848)“…q., but not to the proceedings under the Open Meetings Act, OCGA § 50-14-1 et seq. The trial court also granted de…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026), Georgia Video Recording Laws: All-Party Consent in Private Places (2026)
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 45: PUBLIC RECORDS, DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION
§ 45-254Law enforcement recordings using body camera or vehicle camera; criminal investigation records; disclosure.In forcecited in 9 of our articles
(a) Every audio or video recording made and retained by law enforcement using a body camera or a vehicle camera shall be considered a criminal investigation record as defined in K.S.A. 45-217, and amendments thereto. (b) In addition to any disclosure authorized pursuant to the open records act, K.S.A. 45-215 et seq., and amendments thereto, a person described in subsection (c) may make a request in accordance with procedures adopted under K.S.A. 45-220, and amendments thereto, to listen to an audio recording or to view a video recording made by a body camera or a vehicle camera. The law enforcement agency shall allow the person to listen to the requested audio recording or to view the requested video recording within 20 days after making the request, and may charge a reasonable fee for such services provided by the law enforcement agency.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McRoberts v. Overland Park, Kansas, City of (District Court, D. Kansas 2022)“…aintiff he would respond further by March 4, 2022.12 Under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 45-254(b), however, the custodian has twenty d…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Police Body Camera Laws: Access & K.S.A. 45-254, Kansas Public Records Laws: The Kansas Open Records Act (KORA) Explained, Kansas Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 61: GENERAL PROVISIONS AS TO OFFICES AND OFFICERS -- SOCIAL SECURITY FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES -- EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
§ 61.168Body-worn cameras and video and audio recordings -- Disclosure, retention, and availability for viewing governed by KRS 61.870 to 61.884 and 171.410 to 171.740 -- ExceptionsIn forcecited in 11 of our articles
(1) As used in this section: (a) "Body-worn camera" means a video or audio electronic recording device that is carried by or worn on the body of a public safety officer. This definition does not include a dashboard mounted camera or recording device used in the course of clandestine investigations; (b) "Body-worn camera recording" or "recording" means a video or audio recording, or both, that is made by a body-worn camera during the course of a public safety officer's official duties; (c) "Personal representative" means a court-appointed guardian, attorney, or agent possessing written authorization to act on behalf of a person that is involved in an incident contained in a body-worn camera recording, a person holding a power of attorney for a person that is involved in an incident contained in a body-worn camera recording, or the parent or guardian of a minor child depicted in a body-worn camera recording.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Nathaniel Parish v. Kaitlynn Patrice Petter (2020) addressed whether KRS 61.168 controls how a civil litigant obtains police body-worn camera video, holding that the open records processes in the body camera statutes do not supplant discovery under the Rules of Civil Procedure.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Courier Journal, Inc. v. Shively Police Department (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2022)“…9-month-old infant.” The Courier-Journal notes that while KRS 61.168(4)(g) generally gives an agency discre…”
- Nathaniel Parish v. Kaitlynn Patrice Petter (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2020)✓A man contesting a protective order subpoenaed police body camera video; the court held KRS 61.168's open records process does not supplant civil discovery, so the family court erred by refusing to apply the civil rules, though it found the error harmless.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Kentucky Police Body Camera Laws: KRS 61.168 & Access, Kentucky Public Records Laws: The Open Records Act (KRS 61.870) Explained
United States Code Title 5
§ 552Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedingsIn forcecited in 38 of our articles
Each agency shall make available to the public information as follows: Each agency shall separately state and currently publish in the Federal Register for the guidance of the public— descriptions of its central and field organization and the established places at which, the employees (and in the case of a uniformed service, the members) from whom, and the methods whereby, the public may obtain information, make submittals or requests, or obtain decisions; statements of the general course and method by which its functions are channeled and determined, including the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures available; rules of procedure, descriptions of forms available or the places at which forms may be obtained, and instructions as to the scope and contents of all papers, reports, or examinations; substantive rules of general applicability adopted as authorized by law, and statements of general policy or interpretations of general applicability formulated and adopted by the agency; and each amendment, revision, or repeal of the foregoing.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 11,434 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (1989) held categorically that releasing a private citizen's FBI rap sheet to a third party is an unwarranted privacy invasion under Exemption 7(C). Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. (1980) applied Exemption 3, 552(b)(3).
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society (Supreme Court of the United States 1975, 421 U.S. 240)“…Pub. L. 93-502, § 1 (b) (2), 88 Stat. 1561 (amending 5 U. S. C. § 552 (a)); Packers and Stockyards Act, 42…”
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1980, 447 U.S. 102)✓Consumer groups filed FOIA requests for accident reports manufacturers had given the CPSC as confidential; the Court held that the Consumer Product Safety Act's section 6(b)(1) applies to FOIA requests and that its standards fall within Exemption 3, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3).
- Taylor v. Sturgell (Supreme Court of the United States 2008, 553 U.S. 880)✓An aircraft enthusiast made a FOIA request for FAA records after a friend's identical suit failed; the Court disapproved preclusion by 'virtual representation' and read § 552(a)(3)(A) as directing agencies to release records to the requesting person, not the public at large.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Public Records Laws by State: FOIA Guide for All 50 States (2026), How to File a FOIA Request (Step by Step, 2026), Virginia Freedom of Information Act: Who Can Request and How (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Citizen's Guide to Open Government, Georgia Attorney General (reprinting the Open Records Act, O.C.G.A. 50-18-70 et seq.)(law.georgia.gov).gov
- Georgia Law Enforcement and the Open Records Act, Georgia Attorney General (body camera and in-car recordings, initial incident reports, family violence reports)(law.georgia.gov).gov
- Charging Fees for Open Records Requests, Georgia Department of Public Safety (lowest-paid qualified employee rate, first 15 minutes free, cost estimates above $25 and deferral pending agreement)(dps.georgia.gov).gov
- Open Records Requests, Georgia Governor's Office of Planning and Budget (3-business-day response, 10 cents per page, lowest-paid qualified employee rate, first 15 minutes free)(opb.georgia.gov).gov
- The Open Records Act, O.C.G.A. 50-18-70 et seq., published by the Georgia Attorney General(law.georgia.gov).gov
- Georgia Department of Public Health, State Office of Vital Records(dph.georgia.gov).gov