Idaho
Idaho Pornography Laws (2026): Legality, AV Law & Penalties
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · 10 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Pornography is legal for adults to view and possess privately in Idaho. State law criminalizes distributing or exhibiting obscene material, not the private possession of it, and a 2024 age-verification statute now requires commercial adult websites to check visitors' ages or face private lawsuits with statutory damages.
Is Pornography Legal in Idaho?
Adults may legally view and privately possess sexually explicit material in Idaho. The state's obscenity statute, Idaho Code 18-4103, reaches conduct connected to distribution: bringing obscene matter into Idaho for sale, preparing it for distribution, publishing or exhibiting it, or possessing it with intent to distribute or exhibit it. Possession alone, without that distributive intent, is not listed as a prohibited act.
That distinction matters because it tracks the private-possession baseline the U.S. Supreme Court set in Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969), which held that a state cannot criminalize the private possession of obscene material in a person's own home. Idaho's statute is written narrowly enough to respect that line: the crime attaches to distribution-related conduct, not to viewing or keeping material for personal use.
This legal status applies to adult obscenity generally. It does not extend to child sexual abuse material, which is criminalized regardless of intent to distribute, covered separately below.
Idaho's Obscenity and Distribution Law
Idaho Code 18-4103 makes it a misdemeanor to knowingly bring obscene matter into the state for sale or distribution, prepare it for distribution, publish, print, exhibit, distribute, or offer to distribute it, or possess it with intent to distribute or exhibit it. Idaho law treats "each sale, distribution, or other act described" as a separate violation, so repeated conduct can produce multiple charges even under the misdemeanor tier.
Idaho does not define obscenity by a bright-line list of images or acts. Idaho courts apply the three-part Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), test: whether the material appeals to the prurient interest under contemporary community standards, depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value taken as a whole.
Separately, Idaho Code 18-4105 makes it a misdemeanor to exhibit or display genitals, sex acts, or sadomasochistic depictions where the display is easily visible from a street, sidewalk, or other public area, or from a residence or transit vehicle where the occupants object.
Federal record-keeping requirements under 18 U.S.C. 2257, which require producers of sexually explicit content to verify and document performers' ages, are a federal obligation. Idaho has no parallel state-level record-keeping statute of its own; producers operating in Idaho are still bound by the federal requirement.
Idaho's Age-Verification Law for Adult Websites
Idaho enacted an age-verification requirement for commercial adult websites through HB 498 (2024), codified starting at Idaho Code 6-3801, effective July 1, 2024. Under Idaho Code 6-3803, a commercial entity that knowingly and intentionally publishes material harmful to minors on the internet is liable if its website contains a substantial portion of such material and the entity fails to perform reasonable age verification of visitors. The statute does not set a numeric percentage for what counts as a "substantial portion," leaving that determination to case-by-case application.

Idaho's law stands out for how it is enforced. Rather than routing enforcement through the Attorney General, Idaho Code 6-3804 gives a private right of action to any person exposed to non-age-verified material harmful to minors, or to the parent or guardian of an exposed child. A prevailing claimant can recover injunctive relief, nominal and compensatory damages, statutory damages of no less than $10,000, and attorney's fees. The claim must be brought within four years of accrual.
As of this writing, no legal challenge to Idaho's age-verification law has been reported, unlike several peer states whose laws drew First Amendment litigation. Idaho's private-lawsuit enforcement model means the practical effect on site compliance depends on individual claimants coming forward, not centralized state enforcement.
Harmful-to-Minors Material and Child Sexual Abuse Material
Idaho separates material that is legal for adults but restricted around minors from child sexual abuse material (CSAM), which is illegal regardless of the audience.
Harmful-to-minors dissemination. Idaho Code 18-1515 makes it a misdemeanor to knowingly give or make available sexually explicit material to a minor, to possess such material with intent to promote it to minors, to sell or loan it to a minor for money, or to exhibit a sexually explicit film or presentation to a minor with or without payment. A conviction carries up to one year in county jail, a fine of up to $1,000, or both. The section was most recently amended in 2026.
Child sexual abuse material. Idaho Code 18-1507, Sexual Exploitation of a Child, criminalizes producing, distributing, or possessing material depicting a minor engaged in sexual conduct. Production and distribution are felonies punishable by up to 30 years in prison and a fine of up to $50,000; distribution does not require a sale or other payment to constitute the offense. Possession is a felony punishable by up to 10 years and a fine of up to $10,000. A narrow carveout allows a misdemeanor charge instead of a felony when an adult 18 or older is found with self-generated material a minor sent voluntarily, the age gap between the two is three years or less, and there was no coercion, manipulation, or fraud.
For teen sexting specifically, meaning minors creating or sharing images of themselves or each other, Idaho has a separate statute with its own penalty structure. See Idaho Sexting Laws for that framework; it is not duplicated here.
Non-Consensual Intimate Images and Deepfakes
Idaho addresses the non-consensual sharing of real intimate images separately from AI-generated fakes.
Idaho Code 18-6605, the video voyeurism statute, makes it a felony to disseminate, publish, or sell an identifiable person's intimate images when the person's intimate areas are exposed or they are shown engaged in a sexual act, the disseminator intended to annoy, threaten, harass, humiliate, or degrade the person, and knew the person expected the images to remain private and had not consented to sharing them.
Idaho Code 18-6606 separately covers non-consensual explicit synthetic media, commonly called deepfakes. It is a misdemeanor to disclose such synthetic media knowing the depicted person did not consent and the disclosure would cause substantial emotional distress, or to disclose it intending to annoy, threaten, intimidate, harass, humiliate, or degrade the person, or to possess such media and threaten to disclose it to extort money or property. The offense becomes a felony, punishable by up to 10 years and a fine of up to $25,000, when the depicted person is under 18 or the offender has a prior conviction under the section within the preceding five years.
This is a brief overview. For the fuller framework covering non-consensual intimate image sharing across states, see Revenge Porn Laws by State, which also covers the federal Take It Down Act.
Public Display and Indecent Exposure
Beyond obscene material specifically, Idaho Code 18-4116 makes indecent exposure a misdemeanor for a first or second offense, and a felony punishable by up to five years on a third offense within five years. The statute covers willfully and lewdly exposing genitals or developed breasts, including the areola or nipple, or displaying sex toys in public or where others present are offended, as well as procuring or assisting others in such exposure. Breastfeeding or expressing breast milk to feed a child is expressly exempted.

Adult Businesses and Local Zoning
Idaho does not have a comprehensive statewide licensing or zoning statute for sexually oriented businesses comparable to laws in some other states. The only state-level restriction tied to adult entertainment sits inside Idaho's liquor licensing law: Idaho Code 23-614 bars a licensee under Title 23 from knowingly allowing live entertainment that exposes genitals, female areola, the anal cleft, anus, or pubic hair, live conduct including intercourse, masturbation, sodomy, bestiality, or oral copulation, or the display of obscene or indecent visual material, with an exemption for theatrical or artistic performances of serious value presented at appropriate venues. A violation is a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of $100 to $300, 30 days to 6 months, or both, and can also lead to suspension or revocation of the liquor license.
A widely repeated claim online describes a statewide "2,500-foot" buffer zone and state licensing requirement for adult businesses in Idaho. That claim traces to a local Idaho Falls municipal ordinance, not state law, and should not be cited as a statewide rule. Any zoning or hours-of-operation restriction on adult businesses beyond the liquor-license rule above comes from individual city or county ordinances, not Idaho Code.
Penalties at a Glance
| Offense | Citation | Classification |
|---|---|---|
| Obscenity, distribution (adult) | Idaho Code 18-4103 | Misdemeanor |
| Public display of offensive sexual material | Idaho Code 18-4105 | Misdemeanor |
| Disseminating harmful material to minors | Idaho Code 18-1515 | Misdemeanor, up to 1 year jail and/or $1,000 fine |
| Sexual exploitation of a child, production or distribution | Idaho Code 18-1507 | Felony, up to 30 years and/or $50,000 fine |
| Sexual exploitation of a child, possession | Idaho Code 18-1507 | Felony, up to 10 years and/or $10,000 fine |
| Non-consensual disclosure of intimate images | Idaho Code 18-6605 | Felony |
| Non-consensual explicit synthetic media (deepfakes) | Idaho Code 18-6606 | Misdemeanor; felony up to 10 years and/or $25,000 fine if victim is a minor or offender has a prior conviction |
| Indecent exposure, 1st or 2nd offense / 3rd offense | Idaho Code 18-4116 | Misdemeanor / felony up to 5 years |
| Adult-site age-verification noncompliance | Idaho Code 6-3803, 6-3804 | Civil, private right of action, statutory damages of at least $10,000 per violation |
| Nude or sexual entertainment at a liquor-licensed premises | Idaho Code 23-614 | Misdemeanor, $100 to $300 fine and/or 30 days to 6 months, plus possible license action |
Practical Considerations
Idaho's obscenity and age-verification statutes govern state-level exposure, but they do not displace other layers of restriction. Federal law, including 18 U.S.C. 2257 record-keeping and federal CSAM statutes, applies to producers and distributors regardless of Idaho's own rules. Workplace acceptable-use policies and device or network administrator controls can also restrict access to lawful adult content independent of anything in Idaho Code. And because Idaho's age-verification law is enforced through private lawsuits rather than a state regulator, a website's compliance status is not something a state agency tracks or publishes.

This article provides general legal information about Idaho law and is not legal advice. Consult an attorney for advice specific to your situation.
More Idaho Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal to watch pornography in Idaho?
No. Idaho Code 18-4103 criminalizes distributing or exhibiting obscene material, and possessing it with intent to distribute, but not the act of viewing or privately possessing it as an adult. This is consistent with the private-possession baseline set by Stanley v. Georgia.
Does Idaho require adult websites to verify a visitor's age?
Yes. Idaho Code 6-3803, effective July 1, 2024, requires commercial adult websites with a substantial portion of material harmful to minors to perform reasonable age verification. It is enforced through a private lawsuit under Idaho Code 6-3804 rather than by the Attorney General.
What happens if a website does not comply with Idaho's age-verification law?
A person exposed to non-age-verified material harmful to minors, or a parent or guardian of an exposed child, can sue under Idaho Code 6-3804 for injunctive relief, compensatory damages, statutory damages of at least $10,000, and attorney's fees, within four years of the violation.
Is possession of child sexual abuse material treated differently from adult obscenity in Idaho?
Yes. Adult obscenity possession without intent to distribute is not a crime in Idaho. Possession of child sexual abuse material is a felony under Idaho Code 18-1507, punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000, regardless of intent to distribute, subject only to a narrow misdemeanor carveout for a limited self-generated-material scenario.
Does Idaho have a state law against revenge porn?
Yes. Idaho Code 18-6605 makes non-consensual disclosure of intimate images a felony, and Idaho Code 18-6606 separately makes non-consensual explicit deepfakes a crime, escalating to a felony when the victim is a minor or the offender has a prior conviction.
Does Idaho have a statewide law restricting where adult bookstores or strip clubs can operate?
Not a comprehensive one. The only state-level rule ties to liquor licensing under Idaho Code 23-614, which restricts certain nude or sexual entertainment at alcohol-licensed premises. Distance and hours restrictions on adult businesses generally come from local city or county ordinances rather than state law.
Is federal recordkeeping under 18 U.S.C. 2257 an Idaho state requirement?
No. Record-keeping obligations for producers of sexually explicit content under 18 U.S.C. 2257 are federal, not imposed by Idaho Code. They apply to producers operating in Idaho regardless of the state's own obscenity and age-verification statutes.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Idaho Code
§ 18-4103General sale or distribution, etc., of obscene matter — Penalty. Every person in this state who knowingly: brings or causes to be brought into this state for sale or distribution; or in this state prepares for distribution, publishes, prints, exhibits, distributes, or offers to distribute; or has in his possession with intent to distribute, exhibit, or offer to distribute, any obscene matter is guilty of a misdemeanor. Each sale, distribution, etc., is a separate violationIn force
18-4103. General sale or distribution, etc., of obscene matter — Penalty. Every person in this state who knowingly: brings or causes to be brought into this state for sale or distribution; or in this state prepares for distribution, publishes, prints, exhibits, distributes, or offers to distribute;…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1996
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Larsen (Idaho Court of Appeals 1996, 129 Idaho 294)“…eanor counts of the sale of obscene matter in violation of Idaho Code § 18-4103 . On appeal they contend that they were…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 6-3803intentional publication or distribution of material harmful to minors on the internetIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
6-3803. intentional publication or distribution of material harmful to minors on the internet. (1) Any commercial entity that knowingly and intentionally publishes material that is harmful to minors on the internet from a website that contains a substantial portion of such material shall be liable…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Also relied on in: Idaho Age Verification Law: HB 498 Requirements Explained
§ 6-3804PRIVATE CAUSE OF ACTIONIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
6-3804. PRIVATE CAUSE OF ACTION. (1) Any person exposed to material harmful to minors in violation of section 6-3803, Idaho Code, including the parent or guardian of a child exposed to material harmful to minors, has standing to bring a civil action against any person or entity that is liable under…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
§ 18-1515Disseminating material harmful to minors — Defined — Penalty. A person is guilty of disseminating material harmful to minors when:In force
18-1515. Disseminating material harmful to minors — Defined — Penalty. A person is guilty of disseminating material harmful to minors when: 1.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1998
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Byington (Idaho Court of Appeals 1998, 132 Idaho 597)“…team, the basis for probable cause would not change. 9. Idaho Code § 18-1515 states in relevant part (with emphasis…”
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (Supreme Court of the United States 1997, 521 U.S. 844)“…movie houses or shows that are "pornographic for minors"); Idaho Code § 18-1515 (2) (1987) (no minors in places display…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 18-1507definitions — Sexual exploitation of a child — penaltiesIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
18-1507. definitions — Sexual exploitation of a child — penalties. (1) As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires: (a) "Bestiality" means a sexual connection in any manner between a human being and any animal.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 33 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Doe v. Boy Scouts of America (Idaho Supreme Court 2009, 148 Idaho 427)“…ion 18-1506; (c) sexually exploited the child as defined in Idaho Code section 18-1507; or (d) injured the child as defined in…”
- Steed v. Grand Teton Council of the Boy Scouts of America, Inc. (Idaho Supreme Court 2007, 144 Idaho 848)“…18-1506 ; (3) sexual exploitation of a child as defined in Idaho Code § 18-1507 ; and (4) injury to a child as defined…”
- State v. Maidwell (Idaho Supreme Court 2002, 137 Idaho 424)“…xploits children for commercial or noncommercial purposes, Idaho Code §§ 18-1507 & -1507A (1997), possession of a contr…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026), Idaho Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
§ 18-6605video voyeurismIn forcecited in 13 of our articles
18-6605. video voyeurism. (1) As used in this section: (a) "Broadcast" means the electronic transmittal of a visual image with the intent that it be viewed by a person or persons. (b) "Disseminate" means to make available by any means to any person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Gomez-Alas (Idaho Supreme Court 2020, 167 Idaho 857)“…does not constitute an infamous crime against nature under Idaho Code sections 18-6605 and 18-6606; (2) there was…”
- State v. Martinez (Idaho Supreme Court 1986, 111 Idaho 281)“…4 ; Robbery, Idaho Code § 18-6503 ; Crime against nature, Idaho Code § 18-6605 ; Forcible sexual penetration by use of…”
- State v. Cook (Idaho Court of Appeals 2008, 146 Idaho 261)“…is unconstitutional. Id. at 712, 69 P.3d at 132. Idaho Code Section 18-6605, provides: Every pers…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Laws on Recording in Public: Photography, Filming, and Audio Rights (2026), Idaho Security Camera Laws: Home, Business, and Surveillance Rules (2026), Idaho Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights (2026)
§ 18-6606DISCLOSING EXPLICIT SYNTHETIC MEDIAIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
18-6606. DISCLOSING EXPLICIT SYNTHETIC MEDIA. (1) A person is guilty of disclosing explicit synthetic media when the person knowingly: (a) Discloses explicit synthetic media and knows or reasonably should know that: (i) An identifiable person portrayed in whole or in part in the explicit synthetic…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Gomez-Alas (Idaho Supreme Court 2020, 167 Idaho 857)“…sence of male DNA found in the perineal area and iv) Idaho Code § 18-6606 which only requires “slight penetration…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Video Recording Laws: Rules for Filming, Surveillance, and Privacy (2026), Idaho Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Privacy Violations, and Penalties (2026), Idaho Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
§ 18-4105Public display of offensive sexual material — Penalty. Any person who knowingly exhibits or displays or permits to be exhibited or displayed any of the following in such a manner that such exhibit or display is easily visible from any street, sidewalk, thoroughfare, or other public area; or is visible from any transportation facility; or is visible from any residence when the person knows that the owner or occupant of such residence objects to such exhibit or display:In force
18-4105. Public display of offensive sexual material — Penalty. Any person who knowingly exhibits or displays or permits to be exhibited or displayed any of the following in such a manner that such exhibit or display is easily visible from any street, sidewalk, thoroughfare, or other public area;…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
§ 18-4116Indecent exposureIn force
18-4116. Indecent exposure. (1) A person is guilty of a misdemeanor if the person willfully and lewdly, either: (a) Exposes his or her genitals; exposes developed female breasts, including the areola and nipple; exposes adult male breasts, including the areola and nipple, that have been medically…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Staples (Idaho Court of Appeals 2023)“…te charged Colin James Staples with indecent exposure under Idaho Code § 18-4116. The State filed a motion in limine req…”
- State v. Glass (Idaho Court of Appeals 2008, 146 Idaho 77)“…tempted to charge Glass with soliciting indecent exposure, Idaho Code § 18-4116 , as a violation under I.C. § 18-1509A.…”
- State v. John Doe (Idaho Court of Appeals 2026)“…committed the offense of indecent exposure, in violation of Idaho Code § 18-4116.1 Doe argues the magistrate court erred…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 23-614Prohibited acts — Misdemeanors — PenaltiesIn force
23-614. Prohibited acts — Misdemeanors — Penalties. (1) It shall be unlawful for a licensee or his agent or employee to knowingly allow or engage in any of the following kinds of conduct on his licensed premises: (a) Any live conduct or entertainment by any person whose genitals, female areola,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
United States Code Title 18
§ 2257Record keeping requirementsIn forcecited in 33 of our articles
Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digital image, digitally- or computer-manipulated image of an actual human being, picture, or other matter which— contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct; and is produced in whole or in part with materials which have been mailed or shipped in interstate or foreign commerce, or is shipped or transported or is intended for shipment or transportation in interstate or foreign commerce; shall create and maintain individually identifiable records pertaining to every performer portrayed in such a visual depiction.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 68 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Connection Distributing Co. v. The Honorable Janet Reno (1998) affirmed denial of a preliminary injunction against section 2257. Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States (2012) reviewed it as content neutral under intermediate scrutiny, a standard the Third Circuit later replaced with strict scrutiny.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1994, 513 U.S. 64)“…rformers with independent penalties for failure to comply. 18 U. S. C. §§ 2257 (a) and (i) (1988 ed. and Supp. V); Am…”
- Connection Distributing Co. v. The Honorable Janet Reno (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 1998, 154 F.3d 281)✓A swingers magazine that ran readers' sexually explicit ads challenged section 2257's age record and labeling duties; the court treated the statute as content neutral, found no substantial likelihood of First Amendment success, and affirmed denial of a preliminary injunction.
- Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2012, 677 F.3d 519)✓Adult film producers, photographers and sex educators challenged section 2257's recordkeeping duties; the court held the statutes content neutral and found they advance protecting children, but vacated dismissal of the First and Fourth Amendment claims for record development.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to File a DMCA Takedown on Xvideos (2026 Guide), West Virginia Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras and Privacy Violations, Illinois Pornography Laws (2026): Legality & No AV Law Yet
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Idaho Code 18-4103 - General sale or distribution of obscene matter(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code 18-4105 - Public display of offensive sexual material(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code 6-3803 - Age verification required(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code 6-3804 - Civil remedy for age-verification violations(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code 18-1515 - Disseminating material harmful to minors(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code 18-1507 - Sexual exploitation of a child(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code 18-6605 - Crime of video voyeurism(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code 18-6606 - Disclosing explicit synthetic media(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code 18-4116 - Indecent exposure(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code 23-614 - Prohibited conduct on licensed premises(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969)(law.cornell.edu)
- Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)(law.cornell.edu)