Idaho
Idaho Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 10 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Idaho addresses teen sexting through a dedicated statute, Idaho Code §18-1507A, rather than its general child exploitation law. A minor who sends a self-created explicit image to one recipient commits a misdemeanor, while repeated or wide distribution can escalate to a felony on a second offense.
Overview of Idaho Sexting Laws
Idaho is one of the minority of states that has enacted a specific statute addressing teen sexting. Rather than forcing prosecutors to choose between ignoring the behavior or charging minors with felony child pornography, the Idaho Legislature passed Idaho Code §18-1507A in 2016. This law, titled "Sexual Exploitation of a Child by Electronic Means," creates a tiered framework that treats teen sexting as a less severe offense than traditional child exploitation while still recognizing the risks involved.

This article covers every relevant Idaho statute, including the teen sexting law, adult liability, child exploitation charges, revenge porn, and the state's 2024 laws targeting AI-generated deepfakes.
Idaho Teen Sexting Law (§18-1507A)
Idaho's primary law addressing teen sexting is Idaho Code §18-1507A. This statute applies specifically to minors (under 18) and distinguishes between consensual sharing and malicious distribution.
Self-Produced Images Sent to One Person (Subsection 1)
A minor commits a misdemeanor if they:
- Create photographic or video content of themselves that depicts explicit sexual conduct.
- Knowingly and willfully distribute it to a single recipient through electronic means.
- Were not induced by coercion, manipulation, or fraud.
This provision covers the most common teen sexting scenario: a teenager voluntarily sending a nude photo to a boyfriend or girlfriend.
Distribution to Multiple Recipients (Subsection 2)
The penalties increase when a minor distributes the image "in such a way that the minor intended or had reason to believe that multiple parties would receive or have access to the image." This covers posting images on social media, sending them to group chats, or uploading them to websites.
- First Offense: Misdemeanor
- Second or Subsequent Offense: Felony
This distinction is critical. Sending a private photo to one person is treated differently than blasting that same photo to the entire school or posting it on Instagram or TikTok.
The Coercion Clause (Subsection 5)
The most severe penalties in the teen sexting statute are reserved for malicious behavior. Under §18-1507A(5), a minor who receives explicit content and distributes or threatens to distribute it for the purpose of:
- Coercing any action
- Causing embarrassment
- Controlling or manipulating the sender
...is guilty of a felony. This effectively covers "revenge porn" or "sextortion" committed by minors, and it applies even on a first offense.
Penalties for Teen Sexting in Idaho
Under §18-1507A, penalties are tiered based on the severity of the action and the offender's history.
| Offense Type | Classification | Typical Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Single Recipient (Self-Created) | Misdemeanor | Juvenile adjudication, probation, counseling |
| Multiple Recipients (1st Offense) | Misdemeanor | Juvenile adjudication, community service |
| Multiple Recipients (2nd+ Offense) | Felony | Potential detention, stricter supervision |
| Sharing Third-Party Images (1st Offense) | Misdemeanor | Juvenile adjudication |
| Using Images for Coercion/Blackmail | Felony | Serious felony charges, potential detention |
Juvenile Court Jurisdiction (Subsection 7)
Subsection 7 of §18-1507A explicitly states that proceedings for teen sexting violations "shall fall under the jurisdiction of the juvenile corrections act." This means cases are handled in juvenile court, where the focus is on rehabilitation. Typical outcomes include:
- Probation
- Counseling or educational courses on digital safety
- Community service
- Confiscation of electronic devices
If a minor is charged with a more serious felony under §18-1507 (Sexual Exploitation of a Child) because of a large age gap or egregious conduct, prosecutors may seek to try the minor as an adult depending on the minor's age and criminal history.
Possession and the 3-Year Age Rule
Possessing explicit images of minors is generally a serious crime in Idaho. However, §18-1507A(3) provides a specific framework for minors possessing images of other minors.
How the 3-Year Age Rule Works
A minor who knowingly possesses sexually explicit content of another minor is guilty of a misdemeanor only if the depicted minor is not more than three years younger than the possessing minor.
Critical warning: If the depicted minor is more than 3 years younger than the defendant, the possession charge is elevated to a violation of §18-1507(2)(a). That is the general felony Sexual Exploitation of a Child statute. This carries much harsher penalties and potential sex offender registration.
This 3-year rule functions similarly to a "Romeo and Juliet" provision, keeping possession charges as misdemeanors rather than felonies when the age difference is small.
Adult Liability Under §18-1507(5)
Idaho law also addresses adults who possess sexts originally created and sent by minors. A person 18 or older who possesses content created and distributed under §18-1507A(1) or (2) is guilty of a misdemeanor under §18-1507(5), but only if all three conditions are met:
- The minor depicted distributed the content in a way that they intended the adult to receive it.
- The minor depicted is not more than three years younger than the adult.
- The adult did not use coercion, manipulation, or fraud to obtain the content.
If any of these conditions is not met, the adult faces felony charges under §18-1507 instead, with penalties of up to 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine for possession.
This provision recognizes the reality that an 18-year-old dating a 16- or 17-year-old may receive images the minor voluntarily shared. However, the conditions are strict. An adult who solicits, coerces, or pressures the minor to send images will face full felony prosecution.
Child Exploitation Laws (§18-1507)
When conduct falls outside the scope of the teen sexting statute, such as when an adult is involved or the age gap exceeds three years, prosecutors use Idaho Code §18-1507, "Sexual Exploitation of a Child."
This is Idaho's primary child pornography statute. It makes it a felony to:
- Possess or access sexually exploitative material involving children.
- Cause or induce a child to engage in sexual conduct for the purpose of creating such material.
- Distribute, publish, or exchange such material.
Penalties Under §18-1507
The penalties vary by subsection:
| Offense | Maximum Prison Term | Maximum Fine |
|---|---|---|
| Possession (§18-1507(2)(a)) | 10 years | $10,000 |
| Production, distribution, or inducement (§18-1507(2)(b), (c), (d)) | 30 years | $50,000 |
Convictions under §18-1507 require mandatory sex offender registration under Idaho Code §18-8304.
Revenge Porn and Video Voyeurism (§18-6605)
For adults (and minors in some contexts), the non-consensual sharing of intimate images is prosecuted under Idaho Code §18-6605, the "Crime of Video Voyeurism" (redesignated from §18-6609 in 2022).
While originally designed to address hidden recording, this law includes provisions that effectively ban revenge porn. It creates a criminal offense when someone:
- With the intent to annoy, terrify, threaten, intimidate, harass, offend, humiliate, or degrade another person...
- Intentionally disseminates, publishes, or sells any image of another person...
- Whose intimate areas are exposed or who is engaged in a sexual act...
- When the person had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Penalty: Video voyeurism is a felony in Idaho, punishable by up to 5 years in prison and fines up to $50,000.
AI-Generated Deepfakes (2024 Laws)
In 2024, Idaho passed two significant laws targeting AI-generated sexual imagery.
AI-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Material (HB 465)
Governor Brad Little signed House Bill 465 on March 25, 2024. It became 2024 Session Law Chapter 194 and took effect on July 1, 2024. The bill did three things: it amended §18-1507, it amended §18-1507A, and it created a new crime at §18-1507C, "Visual Representations of the Sexual Abuse of Children."
Which penalty applies turns on whether a real, identifiable child is depicted. That single line separates two very different levels of exposure.
Material depicting an identifiable child (§18-1507). Section 1 of the bill added §18-1507(1)(l)(ii), which reaches material that "has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable child is engaging in, participating in, observing, or being used for explicit sexual conduct." Under §18-1507(1)(f), an identifiable child is someone who was a minor when the material was created and is recognizable as an actual person by face, likeness, or another distinguishing characteristic. The state does not have to prove that child's actual identity. Material in this category carries the full §18-1507 penalties described above: up to 10 years and a $10,000 fine for possession, and up to 30 years and a $50,000 fine for production or distribution.
Fully synthetic material (§18-1507C). The new section reaches a visual depiction, "including a video or image created using generative AI or machine learning," that depicts a child engaging in explicit sexual conduct and is obscene. Under §18-1507C(3), "It shall not be a required element of a violation of subsection (1) of this section that the child depicted actually exists," so no real child is needed. This is still a felony, but it is punishable by imprisonment for up to five years, a fine of up to $5,000, or both. It is not the 30-year exposure that applies to identifiable-child material.
Two features of §18-1507C have no counterpart in §18-1507. It carries an obscenity element under §18-1507C(1)(b), so material that is not obscene falls outside it. And §18-1507C(4) provides an affirmative defense for a defendant who possessed five or fewer such depictions and either destroyed them or reported the matter to law enforcement without retaining access to them.
AI-Generated Revenge Porn (HB 575 / §18-6606)
Governor Little signed House Bill 575 on March 19, 2024, creating Idaho Code §18-6606, "Disclosing Explicit Synthetic Media." This law criminalizes the creation and distribution of AI-generated sexually explicit images made to look like a real, identifiable person without their consent.
Key provisions of §18-6606:
- First offense, victim 18 or older, no prior conviction: Misdemeanor
- Any offense where the identifiable person is under 18, or a second offense (or a prior similar conviction within the past 5 years): Felony, punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a $25,000 fine
- Threatening disclosure to extort money or valuables: Criminal offense
The law includes exceptions for law enforcement investigations, reporting unlawful conduct, matters of public interest, legitimate scientific or educational purposes, and civil legal proceedings.
Defenses and Reporting Exceptions
Safe Harbor for Reporting (§18-1507A(6))
Idaho law includes a crucial protection for minors who want to do the right thing. A minor who receives explicit content and distributes it only to:
- A parent or guardian
- One having custody of the minor
- A law enforcement official
...for the purpose of reporting the activity is not guilty of a crime under §18-1507A.
This encourages teens to report illegal images without fear that showing the evidence to an adult will result in criminal charges for "distribution."
Other Potential Defenses
While Idaho law does not list formal affirmative defenses for sexting, defense attorneys may raise arguments including:
- Lack of knowledge: The defendant did not know the content existed on their device (such as unsolicited images saved automatically).
- No willful distribution: The content was not intentionally shared (such as a phone being accessed by someone else).
- Age verification: The defendant reasonably believed the depicted person was an adult.
- Constitutional challenges: First Amendment arguments in cases involving self-expression, though courts have generally upheld these statutes.
Sex Offender Registration
Whether a sexting conviction triggers sex offender registration depends on which statute applies:
- Misdemeanor under §18-1507A (Teen Sexting): Does not require sex offender registration.
- Felony under §18-1507 (Sexual Exploitation of a Child): Requires mandatory registration under §18-8304, and registration is for life. After a minimum of 10 years from release from incarceration or from being placed on parole, supervised release, or probation, whichever is later, an offender who is not a recidivist, was not convicted of an aggravated offense, and is not designated a violent sexual predator may petition the court for a show-cause hearing to be exempted from the requirement under §18-8310. Release is never automatic; it requires clear and convincing evidence at a hearing.
- Felony under §18-6605 (Video Voyeurism): May require registration depending on the specific circumstances of the case.
Federal Law Considerations
Beyond Idaho's own statutes, non-consensual intimate imagery can also violate federal law. The TAKE IT DOWN Act (Public Law 119-12, signed May 19, 2025) makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish an intimate image without the depicted person's consent, or to threaten to do so, at 47 U.S.C. Section 223(h). For an authentic image, publishing it, or threatening to, carries up to 2 years in prison for an adult victim or 3 years for a minor victim. A lower penalty, up to 18 months for an adult victim or 30 months for a minor victim, applies only to a threat involving an AI-generated digital forgery, not a real photo. Covered platforms must also remove a reported image within 48 hours of notice, a duty that became enforceable in May 2026. Separately, 15 U.S.C. Section 6851, a 2022 federal law, lets victims sue in civil court for actual damages or $150,000 in liquidated damages, plus attorney's fees.
What to Do If Charged
If you or your child is facing an investigation for sexting or distribution of explicit images in Idaho:
- Do not speak to police without an attorney. You have the right to remain silent under the Fifth Amendment.
- Do not try to explain the situation to investigators. Statements made without legal counsel present can be used against you.
- Do not delete evidence. If you know an investigation is pending, destroying evidence can lead to separate criminal charges.
- Contact a defense attorney who specializes in juvenile law or sex crimes immediately. The Idaho State Bar Lawyer Referral Service can help you find qualified counsel.
- For minors: Remember that juvenile proceedings are handled differently than adult criminal court, with a focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment.
More Idaho Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it a crime to have a nude photo of myself on my own phone in Idaho?
No. Idaho Code §18-1507A(1) creates an offense when a minor distributes content to another person. Simply creating and keeping it on your own device is not penalized under this specific section. The legal risk arises only when you share it with someone else.
Can I be charged if I did not ask for the photo?
If you receive an unsolicited photo, you generally are not liable for receiving it. However, if you keep it (possession) or forward it (distribution), you could face charges. The safest course of action is to delete it immediately or report it to a parent or law enforcement under the reporting exception in §18-1507A(6).
What counts as distribution under Idaho law?
Distribution is interpreted broadly. It includes sending via text, direct message, AirDrop, Snapchat, email, or even showing the image on your phone to another person. Showing an image can be considered publishing or displaying under the law.
Does Idaho have a Romeo and Juliet exception for sexting?
Idaho does not use that exact term, but the 3-year age gap rule in §18-1507A(3) functions similarly. It keeps possession charges as misdemeanors rather than felonies when the depicted minor is not more than 3 years younger than the person in possession. A similar 3-year rule applies to adults under Idaho Code §18-1507(5).
Will a teen sexting conviction require sex offender registration?
Misdemeanor convictions under §18-1507A (the teen sexting statute) do not require sex offender registration. However, felony convictions under §18-1507 (Sexual Exploitation of a Child), which apply when the age gap exceeds three years or when an adult is involved without meeting the narrow exceptions, do require mandatory registration.
Updates
Corrected the penalty for AI-generated child sexual abuse material: added Idaho Code 18-1507C, the new crime created by HB 465, which caps fully synthetic obscene depictions at five years and a $5,000 fine rather than the 30-year exposure that applies only where an identifiable child is depicted.
Fixed the video voyeurism and revenge porn citation, which pointed to Idaho Code section 18-6609, a section number retired when the law was renumbered to section 18-6605 in 2022; added a short new section on the 2025 federal TAKE IT DOWN Act, which the page previously did not mention at all.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected three errors: the adult-possession carve-out is Idaho Code 18-1507(5), not 18-1507A(8); sex-offender registration under 18-8310 is for life (10 years is only the earliest a petition for release can be filed, not a fixed duration); and disclosing explicit synthetic media of a minor is a felony on the first offense, not only on a second offense.
Corrected when the 10-year petition period begins under Idaho Code 18-8310: it runs from release from incarceration or from placement on supervision, whichever is later.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Idaho Code
§ 18-1507aSexual exploitation of a child by electronic meansIn force
18-1507A. Sexual exploitation of a child by electronic means. (1) A minor child who, without being induced by coercion, manipulation or fraud, creates or causes to be created any photographic, electronic or video content of said minor child that would be characterized under any of the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 13 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Kilby (Idaho Court of Appeals 1997, 130 Idaho 747)“…by was indicted on counts III and IV under I.C. § 18-1507A. Idaho Code Section 18-1507A criminalizes possession of the same mat…”
- State v. Weimer (Idaho Court of Appeals 1999, 133 Idaho 442)“…sexual exploitation of a child. I.C. §§ 18-1507 and -1507A. Idaho Code Section 18-1507A, subsection (2), states in relevant par…”
- State v. John Scott Meier (Idaho Court of Appeals 2016, 159 Idaho 712)“…See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970). 2 Idaho Code § 18-1507A has since been repealed, effective July…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 18-1507definitions — Sexual exploitation of a child — penaltiesIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
18-1507. definitions — Sexual exploitation of a child — penalties. (1) As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires: (a) "Bestiality" means a sexual connection in any manner between a human being and any animal.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 33 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Doe v. Boy Scouts of America (Idaho Supreme Court 2009, 148 Idaho 427)“…ion 18-1506; (c) sexually exploited the child as defined in Idaho Code section 18-1507; or (d) injured the child as defined in…”
- Steed v. Grand Teton Council of the Boy Scouts of America, Inc. (Idaho Supreme Court 2007, 144 Idaho 848)“…18-1506 ; (3) sexual exploitation of a child as defined in Idaho Code § 18-1507 ; and (4) injury to a child as defined…”
- State v. Maidwell (Idaho Supreme Court 2002, 137 Idaho 424)“…xploits children for commercial or noncommercial purposes, Idaho Code §§ 18-1507 & -1507A (1997), possession of a contr…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026), Idaho Pornography Laws (2026): Legality, AV Law & Penalties
§ 18-6606DISCLOSING EXPLICIT SYNTHETIC MEDIAIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
18-6606. DISCLOSING EXPLICIT SYNTHETIC MEDIA. (1) A person is guilty of disclosing explicit synthetic media when the person knowingly: (a) Discloses explicit synthetic media and knows or reasonably should know that: (i) An identifiable person portrayed in whole or in part in the explicit synthetic…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Gomez-Alas (Idaho Supreme Court 2020, 167 Idaho 857)“…sence of male DNA found in the perineal area and iv) Idaho Code § 18-6606 which only requires “slight penetration…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Video Recording Laws: Rules for Filming, Surveillance, and Privacy (2026), Idaho Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Privacy Violations, and Penalties (2026), Idaho Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
§ 18-6605video voyeurismIn forcecited in 13 of our articles
18-6605. video voyeurism. (1) As used in this section: (a) "Broadcast" means the electronic transmittal of a visual image with the intent that it be viewed by a person or persons. (b) "Disseminate" means to make available by any means to any person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Gomez-Alas (Idaho Supreme Court 2020, 167 Idaho 857)“…does not constitute an infamous crime against nature under Idaho Code sections 18-6605 and 18-6606; (2) there was…”
- State v. Martinez (Idaho Supreme Court 1986, 111 Idaho 281)“…4 ; Robbery, Idaho Code § 18-6503 ; Crime against nature, Idaho Code § 18-6605 ; Forcible sexual penetration by use of…”
- State v. Cook (Idaho Court of Appeals 2008, 146 Idaho 261)“…is unconstitutional. Id. at 712, 69 P.3d at 132. Idaho Code Section 18-6605, provides: Every pers…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Laws on Recording in Public: Photography, Filming, and Audio Rights (2026), Idaho Security Camera Laws: Home, Business, and Surveillance Rules (2026), Idaho Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights (2026)
§ 18-8304Application of chapter — rulemaking authorityIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
18-8304. Application of chapter — rulemaking authority. (1) The provisions of this chapter shall apply to any person who: (a) On or after July 1, 1993, is convicted of the crime, or an attempt, a solicitation, or a conspiracy to commit a crime provided for in section 18-909 (assault with intent to…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 29 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Zichko (Idaho Supreme Court 1996, 129 Idaho 259)“…304(1) OF THE IDAHO CODE IS NOT UNCONSTITUTIONALLY VAGUE. Idaho Code section 18-8304(1) provides as follows: Any person wh…”
- State v. Yeoman (Idaho Supreme Court 2010, 149 Idaho 505)“…007, he moved to Idaho, but did not register as required by Idaho Code § 18-8304(1)(c). On February 22, 2008, the State…”
- State v. Dickerson (Idaho Court of Appeals 2006, 142 Idaho 514)“…ves the interpretation and the constitutionality of former Idaho Code § 18-8304 , a component of the Sex Offender Regis…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Expungement Laws: Set-Aside, Record Sealing, and Your Options in 2026, Idaho Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 18-8310Release from registration requirements — ExpungementIn force
18-8310. Release from registration requirements — Expungement. (1) Registration under this act is for life; however, any offender, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.idaho.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Knapp (Idaho Court of Appeals 2003, 139 Idaho 381)“…entive to themselves in the choices that they make. Idaho Code § 18-8310 allows the court to “exempt the petiti…”
- State v. Joslin (Idaho Supreme Court 2007, 145 Idaho 75)“…unless the offender successfully petitions the court under Idaho Code § 18-8310 to be relieved of the requirement. Suc…”
- State v. Robinson (Idaho Supreme Court 2006, 143 Idaho 306)“…be released from the requirements of the registration act. Idaho Code § 18-8310 provides: Release from registra…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 15
§ 6851Civil action relating to disclosure of intimate imagesIn forcecited in 24 of our articles
In this section: The term “commercial pornographic content” means any material that is subject to the record keeping requirements under section 2257 of title 18. The term “consent” means an affirmative, conscious, and voluntary authorization made by the individual free from force, fraud, misrepresentation, or coercion. The term “depicted individual” means an individual whose body appears in whole or in part in an intimate visual depiction and who is identifiable by virtue of the person’s face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark or other recognizable feature, or from information displayed in connection with the visual depiction. The term “disclose” means to transfer, publish, distribute, or make accessible.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 49 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):District courts have begun applying the 15 U.S.C. 6851 private action for nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images. Goodnight v. Hammons (2025) read its unwelcome conduct and public concern exceptions narrowly and let the claim proceed. Parkes v. Walker II (2025) dismissed a claim that did not plead interstate commerce.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- TILLE v. KAPLAN (District Court, D. New Jersey 2025)“…iolence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2022 (“VAWA”), 15 U.S.C. § 6851. Compl., D.E. 1, at 7-8. The allegati…”
- Turner v. Echols (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2025)✓A pretrial detainee sued an FBI agent under 15 U.S.C. 6851 over intimate images found in a warrantless phone search; the court dismissed, finding he never alleged he was depicted, never plausibly alleged disclosure, and that the law enforcement exception applied.
- Goodnight v. Hammons (District Court, W.D. Oklahoma 2025)✓A wife allegedly accessed her husband's devices, took his girlfriend's nude photos and sent them to a coworker; the court let the 15 U.S.C. 6851 claim proceed, rejecting the statute's unwelcome-conduct and public-concern exceptions as covering discovered infidelity.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to File a DMCA Takedown on Xvideos (2026 Guide), What Is the Take It Down Act? The 2025 Federal NCII Law Explained, How to File a Take It Down Request (Step by Step)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Idaho Code §18-1507A - Sexual Exploitation of a Child by Electronic Means(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code §18-1507 - Sexual Exploitation of a Child - Penalties(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code §18-6605 - Crime of Video Voyeurism(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code §18-6606 - Disclosing Explicit Synthetic Media(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho House Bill 465 (2024) - AI-Generated Child Exploitation Material(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho House Bill 575 (2024) - Disclosing Synthetic Media(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code §18-8304 - Sex Offender Registration Requirements(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho Code §18-8310 - Release From Registration Requirements(legislature.idaho.gov).gov
- Idaho State Bar Lawyer Referral Service(isb.idaho.gov).gov
- National Center for Missing & Exploited Children(missingkids.org)
- TAKE IT DOWN Act, Public Law 119-12 (2025)(congress.gov).gov
- 15 U.S.C. Section 6851 - Civil Action for Intimate Image Disclosure(law.cornell.edu)
- Idaho Code §18-1507C - Visual Representations of the Sexual Abuse of Children(legislature.idaho.gov)