Minnesota
Minnesota Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 12 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Minnesota requires hospitals to retain core medical records permanently and all other hospital records for at least seven years under Minn. Stat. 145.32. Outside that hospital scheme, Minnesota sets no fixed retention period for physicians licensed by the Board of Medical Practice. The seven-year rule most often quoted, Minn. Rule 2150.7535, binds Board of Behavioral Health and Therapy licensees. Hospital records of minors must be kept seven years or until the patient reaches age 18, whichever occurs last.
Minnesota has some of the most detailed hospital records retention laws in the country. The state draws a clear line between hospital records that must be kept permanently and those that can be destroyed after a set number of years. Physicians, clinics, and other providers fall under a patchwork of board rules, payer requirements, and federal regulations rather than a single state retention period.
This guide explains what Minnesota law requires for every type of healthcare provider, how federal rules layer on top, and what patients need to know about accessing their records.
Hospital Records: Permanent Retention vs. Seven Years
Minnesota Statute 145.32 creates a two-tier system for hospital medical records. Certain core portions of a patient's hospital record must be kept permanently. Other portions may be destroyed after seven years.

The Individual Permanent Medical Record
Under Minn. Stat. 145.32, Subdivision 2, the Commissioner of Health defines by rule which portions of a hospital record constitute the "individual permanent medical record." These portions must be retained indefinitely.
Minnesota Rule 4642.1000 specifies exactly what must be included in the permanent medical record. The required elements are:
- Identification data including the patient's name, address, date of birth, sex, and Social Security number if available
- Medical history covering the present illness, chief complaint, relevant social and family history, and provisional diagnosis (for obstetrical patients, prenatal information must be included; for newborns, birth history and delivery records are required)
- Physical examination report
- Surgical report documenting preoperative diagnosis, surgeon names, anesthetic agent, specimen descriptions with pathological findings, surgical findings, technical procedures, and postoperative diagnosis
- Discharge summary covering the reasons for hospitalization, clinical observations, procedures performed, treatment provided, significant test results, and discharge condition
- Autopsy findings when applicable
These six categories of records must never be destroyed. They form the permanent medical record that Minnesota hospitals are required to maintain for the lifetime of the institution and beyond.
Records That May Be Destroyed After Seven Years
All other portions of the individual hospital medical record, including miscellaneous documents, papers, and correspondence, may be destroyed after seven years. This applies to records that fall outside the six permanent categories listed above.
There are important conditions on this destruction. Under Minn. Stat. 145.32, Subdivision 1, the hospital administrator must obtain consent and approval from the board of directors or other governing body before destroying any records.
The statute also makes clear that nothing prohibits a hospital from retaining records longer than the minimum periods. Many Minnesota hospitals choose to keep all records well beyond seven years as a matter of institutional policy.
Electronic Preservation of Hospital Records
Minnesota Statute 145.30 authorizes hospital administrators to transfer original files and records to photographic film, electronic image, or other electronic preservation technology. This includes case histories, physical examinations, daily hospital records, and related correspondence.
Under Minn. Stat. 145.31, these electronic or photographic copies carry the same legal weight as original documents. Certified copies are admissible as evidence in Minnesota court proceedings with the same force as the originals, whether the original still exists or not. This provision was originally enacted in 1941 and updated in 2008 to reflect modern digital storage methods.
Physician and Provider Retention Requirements
Minnesota does not have a single statute that sets a universal retention period for all healthcare providers. Instead, different rules apply depending on the type of provider.
Physicians Licensed Under the Board of Medical Practice
Minnesota does not impose a fixed records retention period on physicians licensed by the Board of Medical Practice. The board's licensure rules, in Minnesota Rules chapter 5600, contain no records retention part, and no Minnesota statute sets a general retention period for physician records outside the hospital scheme in Minn. Stat. 145.32.
The seven-year figure widely quoted for Minnesota physicians comes from Minn. Rule 2150.7535, which governs a different board's licensees and is described in the next section. It does not bind physicians.
In practice, Minnesota physicians work to deadlines set by other sources rather than by a state retention rule:
- Minnesota Medical Assistance (Medicaid): at least five years after the initial date of billing, under Minn. Rule 9505.2190
- Medicare-participating hospitals: at least five years under 42 CFR 482.24, which reaches records held by the hospital
- Malpractice exposure: records are the primary evidence in any later claim, so practices commonly retain them until the relevant limitations period has run
- Hospital medical staff bylaws and payer contracts, which frequently impose their own retention terms
Many Minnesota practices adopt a seven-year or longer retention policy as a matter of prudence. That is a policy choice, not a state mandate.
Behavioral Health and Therapy Board Licensees: Seven Years
Minnesota Rule 2150.7535 ("Record Keeping") sits in Minnesota Rules chapter 2150, the licensure chapter of the Board of Behavioral Health and Therapy. It binds that board's licensees, who are counseling and behavioral health professionals, and its text speaks throughout of a "client" rather than a patient.
Subpart 3 requires the provider to retain a client's records for a minimum of seven years after the date of the provider's last professional service to the client, except as otherwise provided by law.
The rule also requires providers to maintain accurate and legible records containing:
- An accurate chronological listing of all contacts with the client
- Documentation of services, including assessment methods, data, and reports
- An initial treatment plan and any subsequent revisions
- The name of the individual providing the services
- Case notes for each date of service, including any interventions
- An accurate chronological listing of all fees charged
Other Healthcare Providers
Different categories of Minnesota healthcare providers may face different retention periods depending on their licensing board's rules. Providers regulated under Chapters 147 through 153A of Minnesota Statutes should check with their specific licensing board for applicable retention requirements.
Providers participating in Minnesota Medical Assistance must retain all health service and financial records for a health service that was billed or paid for at least five years after the initial date of billing, under Minnesota Rule 9505.2190.
Records for Minor Patients
Minnesota provides special protections for the medical records of minors. Under Minn. Stat. 145.32, all portions of individual hospital medical records of minors must be maintained for seven years or until the individual reaches the age of majority (18 years old), whichever occurs last.
For example, if a child receives hospital care at age 10, the seven-year deadline falls at age 17, but the age-of-majority deadline falls at age 18, and because the statute requires whichever date is later, the records must be retained until the child turns 18. If a child receives care at age 16, the seven-year deadline falls at age 23, which is later than the age-18 deadline, so the records must be retained until the child turns 23.
A comparable tolling rule applies to Board of Behavioral Health and Therapy licensees. Under Minn. Rule 2150.7535, subpart 3, if the client is a minor, the seven-year retention period does not begin until the client reaches age 18. There is no equivalent rule for physicians licensed by the Board of Medical Practice, who are subject to no fixed state retention period at all.
Once the retention period expires, a minor patient (now an adult) may request that their hospital records be destroyed, unless the hospital is required to retain the records as part of the individual permanent medical record.
Federal Requirements: HIPAA and CMS
Minnesota providers must comply with both state and federal records retention rules. Where federal and state requirements conflict, the stricter standard applies.

HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act)
A common misconception is that HIPAA sets a minimum retention period for medical records. It does not. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the HIPAA Privacy Rule does not include medical record retention requirements. State laws govern how long medical records must be retained.
However, HIPAA does require covered entities to retain HIPAA compliance documentation (policies, procedures, training records, and business associate agreements) for six years from the date of creation or the date when the document was last in effect, whichever is later. This applies to administrative documentation, not patient medical records.
HIPAA also requires covered entities to apply appropriate administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to protect medical records for as long as they are maintained.
CMS Conditions of Participation
Hospitals that participate in Medicare must comply with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Conditions of Participation under 42 CFR 482.24. This regulation requires hospitals to retain medical records in their original or legally reproduced form for a period of at least five years.
Because Minnesota's hospital retention requirements (permanent for core records, seven years for other records) exceed the federal five-year minimum, Minnesota hospitals that follow state law will automatically satisfy the CMS requirement.
Additional CMS-related retention requirements include:
- Cost report records must be retained for at least five years after the closure of the cost report
- Medicare managed care records must be retained for ten years
- Medicaid reimbursement records must be kept for six years from the date of reimbursement or final determination of costs
Patient Access to Medical Records in Minnesota
The Minnesota Health Records Act (Minn. Stat. 144.291 through 144.298) gives patients broad rights to access their medical records.
Right to Access
Under Minn. Stat. 144.292, upon receiving a written request, a provider must supply the patient with complete and current information concerning any diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis within 30 calendar days. The information must be presented in terms and language the patient can reasonably be expected to understand.
Patients may request copies of their health records, including laboratory reports, x-rays, prescriptions, and technical information. Providers must furnish these copies within 30 days.
Fees for Copies
Minnesota law caps the fees providers may charge for medical record copies:
| Copy Type | Fee Structure |
|---|---|
| Paper copies | $1 per page plus $10 retrieval fee |
| Electronic copies | $20 total |
| X-ray copies | $30 total |
| Up to 25 pages | $30 maximum |
| Up to 100 pages | $50 maximum |
| Overall maximum | $500 cap |
For records needed for current medical care review, providers cannot charge any fees. Special fee protections also apply for Social Security disability appeals, where the retrieval fee is capped at $10, and no fees apply when the patient receives public assistance or free legal services.
When Providers May Withhold Records
Under limited circumstances, Minnesota law allows a provider to withhold health record information if disclosure would be detrimental to the physical or mental health of the patient, or is likely to cause the patient to inflict self-harm or harm another person. In these cases, the information must be made available to an appropriate third party or other provider.
Proper Destruction of Medical Records
When the retention period expires and a provider chooses to destroy records, both state and federal rules govern how destruction must be carried out.
Minnesota Requirements
Under Minn. Stat. 145.32, hospital records may only be destroyed with the consent and approval of the hospital's board of directors or governing body. The statute does not prescribe specific destruction methods, but the requirement for board approval ensures institutional oversight of the process.
HIPAA Destruction Standards
The HIPAA Privacy Rule requires covered entities to implement reasonable safeguards when disposing of protected health information (PHI). According to HHS guidance, acceptable destruction methods include:
For paper records:
- Shredding
- Burning
- Pulping
- Pulverizing
For electronic media:
- Clearing (overwriting with non-sensitive data using certified software)
- Purging (degaussing or exposing media to a strong magnetic field)
- Physical destruction (disintegration, pulverization, melting, incinerating, or shredding)
PHI may never be disposed of in dumpsters, recycling bins, garbage cans, or other receptacles accessible by the public or unauthorized persons.
Penalties for Improper Handling
Under Minn. Stat. 144.298, a person who negligently or intentionally releases health records in violation of the Minnesota Health Records Act is liable to the patient for compensatory damages, plus costs and reasonable attorney fees. A violation may also result in disciplinary action against the provider by the appropriate licensing board.
The Minnesota Health Records Act operates independently of, and alongside, HIPAA rather than displacing it. Under HIPAA's own preemption rule (45 CFR 160.203), a state law that is more protective of patient privacy than the federal HIPAA Privacy Rule is not preempted and continues to apply alongside HIPAA.
What Happens When a Medical Practice Closes
When a physician retires or a medical practice closes in Minnesota, the provider remains responsible for maintaining patient records for any applicable retention period. The practice must arrange for a custodian to take over records management.
The Minnesota Board of Medical Practice assists patients who need to locate records from closed practices. Patients can contact the Board at (612) 617-2130 for help finding where their records have been transferred.
Providers who close a practice should:
- Notify patients in advance and provide reasonable time for patients to request copies or transfers of their records
- Arrange for a custodian (another provider, medical records storage company, or successor practice) to maintain records for the remainder of any applicable retention period
- Notify the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice about the closure and the identity of the records custodian
- Continue to comply with HIPAA security and privacy requirements throughout the transition
Failure to properly manage records during a practice closure can result in licensing board discipline and civil liability under the Minnesota Health Records Act.
Minnesota Medical Records Retention Summary Table
| Record Type | Retention Period | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Hospital permanent medical record | Permanent (indefinite) | Minn. Stat. 145.32; Minn. Rule 4642.1000 |
| Hospital non-permanent records | 7 years minimum | Minn. Stat. 145.32, Subd. 1 |
| Hospital records for minors | 7 years or until age 18, whichever occurs last | Minn. Stat. 145.32, Subd. 1 |
| Physician records (Board of Medical Practice) | No fixed state retention period | No Minnesota statute or rule; chapter 5600 has no retention part |
| Behavioral Health and Therapy Board licensee records | 7 years after last professional service | Minn. Rule 2150.7535, subp. 3 |
| Behavioral health records for minor clients | 7 years, clock starts at age 18 | Minn. Rule 2150.7535, subp. 3 |
| Minnesota Medical Assistance provider records | 5 years after initial date of billing | Minn. Rule 9505.2190 |
| HIPAA compliance documentation | 6 years | 45 CFR 164.316 |
| CMS hospital records (Medicare) | 5 years minimum | 42 CFR 482.24 |
| Medicare managed care records | 10 years | CMS guidelines |
| Medicaid reimbursement records | 6 years | CMS guidelines |
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do hospitals in Minnesota have to keep medical records?
Minnesota hospitals must keep the individual permanent medical record (identification data, medical history, physical exam reports, surgical reports, discharge summaries, and autopsy findings) permanently under Minn. Stat. 145.32 and Minn. Rule 4642.1000. All other portions of hospital medical records may be destroyed after seven years with board approval.
How long must Minnesota physicians keep patient records?
Minnesota does not set a fixed retention period for physicians licensed by the Board of Medical Practice. No statute imposes one, and the board's licensure rules in Minnesota Rules chapter 5600 contain no records retention part. The seven-year figure commonly quoted comes from Minn. Rule 2150.7535, which applies to Board of Behavioral Health and Therapy licensees rather than physicians. In practice, Minnesota physicians work to other deadlines, including five years after the initial date of billing for Medical Assistance records under Minn. Rule 9505.2190 and five years for Medicare-participating hospitals under 42 CFR 482.24. Many practices adopt a seven-year policy by choice.
Does Minnesota Rule 2150.7535 apply to my doctor?
No. Minn. Rule 2150.7535 sits in Minnesota Rules chapter 2150, the licensure chapter of the Board of Behavioral Health and Therapy, and binds that board's licensees. Its text refers to a client and to the provider's last professional service to the client. Physicians are licensed by the separate Board of Medical Practice, whose rules are in chapter 5600 and set no retention period.
Does HIPAA require a minimum retention period for medical records?
No. The HIPAA Privacy Rule does not set a minimum retention period for patient medical records. State laws govern medical records retention. However, HIPAA does require covered entities to retain compliance documentation (policies, procedures, and training records) for six years, and it mandates secure destruction of protected health information when records are disposed of.
How can I get my medical records from a closed practice in Minnesota?
Contact the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice at (612) 617-2130 for help locating records from a closed physician practice. The Board maintains information about where records have been transferred when a practice closes.
Can a Minnesota hospital destroy my records after seven years?
A hospital may destroy the non-permanent portions of your medical record after seven years with approval from its board of directors. However, the core permanent medical record (including identification data, medical history, physical exam, surgical reports, discharge summary, and autopsy findings) must be kept permanently and can never be destroyed under Minnesota law.
Updates
Corrected the retention rule for physicians: Minn. Rule 2150.7535 governs Board of Behavioral Health and Therapy licensees, not physicians, and Minnesota sets no fixed retention period for physicians licensed by the Board of Medical Practice outside the hospital rules in Minn. Stat. 145.32.
Corrected an inaccurate claim that the Minnesota Health Records Act contains explicit language requiring stricter-than-HIPAA construction; no such clause exists in the statute. The page now correctly explains that the Act applies alongside HIPAA, with more protective state provisions surviving under HIPAA's own preemption rule (45 CFR 160.203).
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the worked examples and a KeyTakeaways bullet on minor hospital-record retention to Minn. Stat. 145.32's actual 'later of seven years or age 18' rule; the article had wrongly added the two deadlines together (18 plus 7 = 25) instead of taking the later one.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 145: PUBLIC HEALTH PROVISIONS
§ 145.32OLD RECORDS MAY BE DESTROYEDIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Subdivision 1. Hospital records. The superintendent or other chief administrative officer of any public or private hospital, by and with the consent and approval of the board of directors or other governing body of the hospital, may divest the files and records of that hospital of any individual case records and, with that consent and approval, may destroy the records. The records shall first have been transferred and recorded as authorized in section 145.30. Portions of individual hospital medical records that comprise an individual permanent medical record, as defined by the commissioner of health, shall be retained as authorized in section 145.30. Other portions of the individual medical record, including any miscellaneous documents, papers, and correspondence in connection with them, may be divested and destroyed after seven years without transfer to photographic film, electronic image, or other state-of-the-art electronic preservation technology.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-07 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Also relied on in: How Long Do Hospitals Keep Medical Records? (2026), Medical Records Retention Laws by State (2026 Guide)
§ 145.30SUPERINTENDENT OF HOSPITALS TO TRANSFER RECORDSIn force
The superintendent or other chief administrative officer of any public or private hospital, by and with the consent and approval of its board of directors or other governing body, is authorized to transfer and record, or cause to be transferred and recorded, upon photographic film, electronic image, or other state-of-the-art electronic preservation technology of convenient size for the preservation thereof as evidence, any or all of the original files and records of any such hospital dealing with the case history, physical examination, and daily hospital records of the individual patients thereof, including any miscellaneous documents, papers, and correspondence in connection therewith.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
§ 145.31COPIES TO BE USED AS EVIDENCEIn force
Upon the transferring and recording of any such original hospital files and records in the manner hereinbefore provided, such photographic film, electronic image, or other state-of-the-art electronic preservation technology records thereof shall have the same force and effect, when offered in evidence in any proceeding in this state, as the original records from which the same were so transferred and recorded, and any copy made therefrom, when duly certified in writing, attached thereto, by the officer or employee of such hospital in charge of the records, to be such correct and complete copy thereof, shall be admitted and received in evidence, without further foundation, in any proceeding in this state with the same force and effect as the original record of such hospital from which such copy was originally made, whether the original is in existence or not.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 144: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
§ 144.291MINNESOTA HEALTH RECORDS ACTIn force
Subdivision 1. Short title. Sections 144.291 to 144.298 may be cited as the "Minnesota Health Records Act." Subd. 2. Definitions. For the purposes of sections 144.291 to 144.298, the following terms have the meanings given. (a) "Group purchaser" has the meaning given in section 62J.03, subdivision 6. (b) "Health information exchange" means a legal arrangement between health care providers and group purchasers to enable and oversee the business and legal issues involved in the electronic exchange of health records between the entities for the delivery of patient care. (c) "Health record" means any information, whether oral or recorded in any form or medium, that relates to the past, present, or future physical or mental health or condition of a patient; the provision of health care to a patient; or the past, present, or future payment for the provision of health care to a patient. (d) "Identifying information" means the patient's name, address, date of birth, gender, parent's or guardian's name regardless of the age of the patient, and other nonclinical data which can be used to uniquely identify a patient.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 20 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2016, 889 N.W.2d 279)“…hat information violated the Minnesota Health Records Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 144.291-.298 (2014). Affirmed.…”
- Peter Gerard Lonergan, John Joseph Kotowski v. Dakota County Social Services, ... (Court of Appeals of Minnesota 2024)“…01-.90 (2022) and the Minnesota Health Records Act (MHRA), Minn. Stat. §§ 144.291-.298 (2022). Appellants sought compensa…”
- William Findling v. Group Health Plan, Inc., d/b/a Health Partners and Regions Hospital, ... (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2023)“…2, 2007 Minn. Laws 1804, 2098–2106 (codified as amended at Minn. Stat. §§ 144.291–.298 (2022)).…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 144.292PATIENT RIGHTSIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Subdivision 1. Scope. Patients have the rights specified in this section regarding the treatment the patient receives and the patient's health record. Subd. 2. Patient access. Upon request, a provider shall supply to a patient within 30 calendar days of receiving a written request for medical records complete and current information possessed by that provider concerning any diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of the patient in terms and language the patient can reasonably be expected to understand. Subd. 3. Additional patient rights. A patient's right specified in this section and sections 144.293 to 144.298 are in addition to the rights specified in sections 144.651 and 144.652 and any other provision of law relating to the access of a patient to the patient's health records. Subd. 4. Notice of rights; information on release. A provider shall provide to patients, in a clear and conspicuous manner, a written notice concerning practices and rights with respect to access to health records.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- William Findling v. Group Health Plan, Inc., d/b/a Health Partners and Regions Hospital, ... (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2023)“…ords as required by the Minnesota Health Records Act under Minn. Stat. § 144.292, subd. 5 (2022). 2. An indiv…”
- Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P. A., Nina Mattson (Court of Appeals of Minnesota 2015, 863 N.W.2d 95)“…tices and rights with respect to access to health records,” Minn. Stat. § 144.292, subd. 4 (2014), and the notice “must i…”
- Hills, Mary v. Essentia Health (District Court, W.D. Wisconsin 2021)“…arge a “retrieval” fee for these health records requests. Minn. Stat. § 144.292.7…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Minnesota Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights, HIPAA, and Provider Rules
§ 144.298PENALTIESIn force
Subdivision 1. Licensing action. A violation of sections 144.291 to 144.298 may be grounds for disciplinary action against a provider by the appropriate licensing board or agency. Subd. 2. Liability of provider or other person. A person who does any of the following is liable to the patient for compensatory damages caused by an unauthorized release or an intentional, unauthorized access, plus costs and reasonable attorney fees: (1) negligently or intentionally requests or releases a health record in violation of sections 144.291 to 144.297; (2) forges a signature on a consent form or materially alters the consent form of another person without the person's consent; (3) obtains a consent form or the health records of another person under false pretenses; or (4) intentionally violates sections 144.291 to 144.297 by intentionally accessing a record locator or patient information service without authorization. Subd. 3. Liability for record locator or patient information service.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jacky L. Larson v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, CMInformation Specialists, Inc. (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2014, 855 N.W.2d 293)“…A patient does not have a private right of action under Minn. Stat. § 144.298, subd. 2 (2012), when a person releases…”
- William Findling v. Group Health Plan, Inc., d/b/a Health Partners and Regions Hospital, ... (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2023)“…ecific provider conduct prohibited under the statute. Under Minn. Stat. § 144.298, subd. 2 (2022): A person who d…”
- Stresemann v. Jesson (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2015, 868 N.W.2d 32)“…ed complaint also alleged that Morton-Peters violated: (1) Minn. Stat. § 144.298 , subd. 2 (2014); (2) 42 U.S.C. § 1983…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 42
§ 482.24Condition of participation: Medical record services.In forcecited in 52 of our articles
The hospital must have a medical record service that has administrative responsibility for medical records. A medical record must be maintained for every individual evaluated or treated in the hospital. (a) Standard: Organization and staffing. The organization of the medical record service must be appropriate to the scope and complexity of the services performed. The hospital must employ adequate personnel to ensure prompt completion, filing, and retrieval of records. (b) Standard: Form and retention of record. The hospital must maintain a medical record for each inpatient and outpatient. Medical records must be accurately written, promptly completed, properly filed and retained, and accessible. The hospital must use a system of author identification and record maintenance that ensures the integrity of the authentification and protects the security of all record entries. (1) Medical records must be retained in their original or legally reproduced form for a period of at least 5 years. (2) The hospital must have a system of coding and indexing medical records. The system must allow for timely retrieval by diagnosis and procedure, in order to support medical care evaluation studies.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States ex rel. Janssen v. Lawrence Memorial Hospital (2020) held the accurate medical record duty in 42 C.F.R. 482.24 is a generic regulatory requirement that does not establish False Claims Act materiality. United States Ex Rel. El-Amin v. George Washington University (2008) applied 482.24(c) to record completion evidence.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States ex rel. Janssen v. Lawrence Memorial Hospital (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2020, 949 F.3d 533)✓A relator alleged the hospital falsified patient arrival times to raise its Medicare quality-program payments. The court held the general duty to keep accurate medical records under 42 C.F.R. 482.24 does not address those programs and cannot show False Claims Act materiality.
- United States Ex Rel. El-Amin v. George Washington University (District Court, District of Columbia 2008, 533 F. Supp. 2d 12)✓Nurse anesthetists claimed the hospital billed Medicare as though anesthesiologists performed whole procedures. Citing the 30-day rule in 42 C.F.R. 482.24(c)(2), the court excluded late-signing evidence, and excluded mass-signing evidence too though (c)(1) made it probative.
- NATIONAL ASS'N OF PSYCHIATRIC HEALTH SYSTEM v. Shalala (District Court, District of Columbia 2000, 120 F. Supp. 2d 33)“…to preexisting recordkeeping requirements, as specified in 42 C.F.R. § 482.24 . 7 . Proposed Rul…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to Find Old Medical Records Online, Florida Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), Medical Records Retention Laws by State (2026 Guide)
Code of Federal Regulations Title 45
§ 164.316Policies and procedures and documentation requirements.In forcecited in 6 of our articles
A covered entity or business associate must, in accordance with § 164.306: (a) Standard: Policies and procedures. Implement reasonable and appropriate policies and procedures to comply with the standards, implementation specifications, or other requirements of this subpart, taking into account those factors specified in § 164.306(b)(2)(i), (ii), (iii), and (iv). This standard is not to be construed to permit or excuse an action that violates any other standard, implementation specification, or other requirements of this subpart. A covered entity or business associate may change its policies and procedures at any time, provided that the changes are documented and are implemented in accordance with this subpart. (b)(1) Standard: Documentation. (i) Maintain the policies and procedures implemented to comply with this subpart in written (which may be electronic) form; and (ii) If an action, activity or assessment is required by this subpart to be documented, maintain a written (which may be electronic) record of the action, activity, or assessment. (2) Implementation specifications: (i) Time limit (Required).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Deisy Granados v. Pan American Life Insurance Co. (New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division 2026)“…authorized members of its workforce." She further claimed 45 C.F.R. § 164.316 bars defendants from "retaliating agai…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Oklahoma Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), Texas Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), Washington Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 160.203General rule and exceptions.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
A standard, requirement, or implementation specification adopted under this subchapter that is contrary to a provision of State law preempts the provision of State law. This general rule applies, except if one or more of the following conditions is met: (a) A determination is made by the Secretary under § 160.204 that the provision of State law: (1) Is necessary: (i) To prevent fraud and abuse related to the provision of or payment for health care; (ii) To ensure appropriate State regulation of insurance and health plans to the extent expressly authorized by statute or regulation; (iii) For State reporting on health care delivery or costs; or (iv) For purposes of serving a compelling need related to public health, safety, or welfare, and, if a standard, requirement, or implementation specification under part 164 of this subchapter is at issue, if the Secretary determines that the intrusion into privacy is warranted when balanced against the need to be served; or (2) Has as its principal purpose the regulation of the manufacture, registration, distribution, dispensing, or other control of any controlled substances (as defined in 21 U.S.C.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 113 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Samuel Zean v. Fairview Health Services (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 2017, 858 F.3d 520)“…ls if its restrictions are more stringent than HIPAA’s. See 45 C.F.R. § 160.203(b).…”
- Law v. Zuckerman (District Court, D. Maryland 2004, 307 F. Supp. 2d 705)“…e Historical and Statutory notes to 42 U.S.C § 1320d — 2); 45 C.F.R. § 160.203 . Defendant’s counsel has argued…”
- Thomas v. 1156729 Ontario Inc. (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2013, 979 F. Supp. 2d 780)“…o” its requirements. 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-7(a)(1); see also 45 C.F.R. § 160.203 . State law is contrary to HIPAA if (1)…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: HIPAA and Subpoenas: When Can PHI Be Disclosed? (2026), 45 C.F.R. § 164.512 Explained: HIPAA Disclosure Rules
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Minnesota Statute 145.32 - Old Records May Be Destroyed(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minnesota Rule 4642.1000 - Individual Permanent Medical Record(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minnesota Statute 145.30 - Superintendent of Hospitals to Transfer Records(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minnesota Statute 145.31 - Photographic Copies as Evidence(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minnesota Rule 2150.7535 - Record Keeping(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minnesota Statute 144.291 - Minnesota Health Records Act Definitions(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minnesota Statute 144.292 - Patient Access to Health Records(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minnesota Statute 144.298 - Penalties for Health Records Violations(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- HHS - Does HIPAA Require Covered Entities to Keep Medical Records?(hhs.gov).gov
- HHS - Disposal of Protected Health Information FAQs(hhs.gov).gov
- 42 CFR 482.24 - CMS Conditions of Participation: Medical Record Services(law.cornell.edu)
- Minnesota Board of Medical Practice - Medical Records(mn.gov).gov
- Minnesota Department of Health - Medical Records Information(health.state.mn.us).gov
- Minnesota Rules Chapter 5600 - Board of Medical Practice, Licensure and Registration (no records retention part)(revisor.mn.gov)
- Minnesota Rules Chapter 2150 - Board of Behavioral Health and Therapy, Licensure(revisor.mn.gov)
- Minnesota Rule 9505.2190 - Retention of Records (Medical Assistance vendors)(revisor.mn.gov)