Minnesota
Bankruptcy in Minnesota (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Minnesota is one of the states that gives bankruptcy filers a choice: you can use Minnesota's own exemptions or the federal bankruptcy exemptions, whichever protects more of your property. Bankruptcy itself is federal law, but the exemptions that decide what you keep, and the means-test income that decides which chapter you can use, are state-specific. Minnesota's homestead exemption is one of the most generous in the country and is adjusted for inflation, so the figures below reflect the amounts in effect in 2026, and you should confirm the current numbers before relying on them.
This page is general legal information, not legal advice. It is part of our Bankruptcy by State series.
Does Minnesota use state or federal bankruptcy exemptions?
Minnesota is not an opt-out state. A debtor who files bankruptcy in Minnesota may elect to use the Minnesota exemptions, found mainly in Minn. Stat. 510.02 (homestead) and Minn. Stat. 550.37 (personal property), or the federal bankruptcy exemptions in 11 U.S.C. 522(d). You choose one complete menu and cannot mix items from both lists. About a third of states, including Minnesota, allow this choice; roughly two-thirds have opted out and force filers onto state law only.
The choice usually turns on home equity. Minnesota's state homestead is far larger than the federal one, so homeowners with meaningful equity almost always choose the state set. Filers who rent or have little home equity sometimes prefer the federal set because of its larger general wildcard. Even a filer who uses the state exemptions can separately claim the federal nonbankruptcy exemptions for things like Social Security and tax-qualified retirement accounts. Married couples filing jointly elect one system together and cannot split between the two menus. The homestead is also capped per property rather than per debtor: Minn. Stat. 510.02, subd. 1 limits the exemption "per homestead, whether the exemption is claimed by one or more debtors," so joint filers cannot double the $540,000 or $1,350,000 figure.
Minnesota homestead exemption
Minnesota's homestead exemption is the headline protection for homeowners, and it is among the most generous in the United States. Under Minn. Stat. 510.02, the standard homestead exemption protects up to $540,000 of equity in a residence, and a homestead used primarily for agricultural purposes is protected up to $1,350,000. These amounts took effect July 1, 2026 under the biennial inflation adjustment.

The homestead may include any quantity of land up to 160 acres. The dollar amounts are indexed for inflation: under Minn. Stat. 550.37, subd. 4a, the Minnesota Department of Commerce recalculates the figures using the implicit price deflator for the gross domestic product, with adjustments taking effect on July 1 of even-numbered years. That means the next adjustment is scheduled for July 1, 2028, so confirm the figure that applies to your filing date.
Homestead protection covers equity, not the full value of the home. Because Minnesota's exemption is so high, the great majority of Minnesota homeowners can protect all of their home equity, but a residence worth more than the mortgage plus the exemption can still leave non-exempt equity that a Chapter 7 trustee may reach.
Vehicle, wildcard, and personal-property exemptions
Beyond the home, Minnesota protects a range of everyday property under Minn. Stat. 550.37, and those amounts are inflation-adjusted on the same even-year schedule as the homestead:
- Motor vehicle: up to $10,200 of equity in one vehicle, $27,000 for a vehicle regularly used by or for the benefit of a physically disabled person, $110,000 for a vehicle designed or modified to accommodate a disability, and $13,750 for a vehicle reasonably necessary for the debtor's trade or business (subd. 12a). Subdivision 12a lets you claim one of these categories, not several.
- Household furniture, appliances, electronics, and similar goods: an aggregate limit of $12,600 (subd. 4).
- Tools of the trade and business property: an aggregate limit of $14,000 (subd. 6). A debtor who combines this with the farm-machinery exemption in subd. 5 is capped at $13,000 for the two together under subd. 7, and subdivisions 5 and 7 are expressly excluded from the inflation adjustment in subd. 4a.
- Wages and earnings: protected under the garnishment limits in Minn. Stat. 571.922.
- A bankruptcy-only wildcard of $1,650 that can be applied to any property, including funds in a bank account (subd. 28).
- Retirement accounts: tax-qualified plans are protected through separate exemptions and under federal law regardless of which menu you choose.
Because the figures round and update every even-numbered year, always confirm the current numbers in the statute or the Department of Commerce notice before filing.
The Chapter 7 means test in Minnesota
The means test screens who can file Chapter 7. The first step compares your household's current monthly income, annualized, to the median family income for a Minnesota household of the same size. If your income is at or below the Minnesota median, you generally pass and may proceed with Chapter 7. If it is above the median, you complete the longer calculation that subtracts allowed expenses to see whether you have disposable income that should fund a Chapter 13 plan instead.
The U.S. Trustee Program publishes the median figures and updates them periodically. For cases filed on or after July 15, 2026, the Minnesota median family income is:
| Household size | Minnesota median annual income |
|---|---|
| 1 | $77,696 |
| 2 | $98,328 |
| 3 | $126,487 |
| 4 | $149,882 |
Add $11,100 for each additional person beyond four. The U.S. Trustee Program revises the median income data periodically, so confirm the current numbers for your filing date.
Chapter 7 vs. Chapter 13 in Minnesota
Chapter 7 is a liquidation. A trustee can sell non-exempt property to pay creditors, but because Minnesota's exemptions protect most household property and almost all home equity, many Chapter 7 cases are "no-asset" cases where nothing is sold. Most remaining unsecured debt, such as credit cards and medical bills, is discharged in a few months.

Chapter 13 is a reorganization for filers with regular income. You keep your property and repay some or all of what you owe through a three-to-five-year plan. Chapter 13 is often chosen by homeowners who are behind on a mortgage, because the plan can spread out the missed payments and stop a foreclosure while you catch up.
In both chapters, filing triggers the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. 362. The stay immediately halts most collection activity, including foreclosure sales, wage garnishment, repossession, and collection calls, while the case proceeds.
Where you file bankruptcy in Minnesota
Minnesota bankruptcy cases are filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota, the single federal bankruptcy district covering the entire state. The court holds hearings in Minneapolis, St. Paul, Duluth, and Fergus Falls. Before filing, federal law requires you to complete an approved credit-counseling course, and you must complete a debtor-education course before your debts are discharged.
What bankruptcy can and cannot do
Bankruptcy discharges most unsecured debts, but several categories generally survive: most student loans (absent a separate showing of undue hardship), recent income taxes, child support and alimony, and debts from fraud or willful injury. Secured debts like a car loan or mortgage continue if you want to keep the collateral and keep paying.

Because exemption amounts change, and the choice between the state and federal exemption menus and between Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 depends on your full financial picture, many people consult a licensed Minnesota bankruptcy attorney before filing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Minnesota use state or federal bankruptcy exemptions?
Minnesota lets you choose. It has not opted out of the federal exemptions, so a filer domiciled in Minnesota may use either the state exemptions in Minn. Stat. 510.02 and 550.37 or the federal bankruptcy exemptions in 11 U.S.C. 522(d). You pick one full menu, not a mix of both.
What is the homestead exemption in Minnesota?
Minnesota's homestead exemption protects up to $540,000 of equity in a residence, or $1,350,000 for a homestead used primarily for agriculture, under Minn. Stat. 510.02, covering up to 160 acres. These amounts took effect July 1, 2026 under the even-numbered-year adjustment cycle; the next adjustment is due July 1, 2028.
What is the Minnesota median income for the means test?
For cases filed on or after July 15, 2026, the Minnesota median family income is $77,696 for 1 person, $98,328 for 2, $126,487 for 3, and $149,882 for 4, adding $11,100 for each additional person. The U.S. Trustee Program updates these figures periodically.
Will I lose my house or car if I file bankruptcy in Minnesota?
Usually no. Minnesota's homestead exemption of up to $540,000 (or $1,350,000 for an agricultural homestead) protects most or all home equity, and the vehicle exemption protects up to $10,200 of car equity. Most filers keep their home and car as long as they stay current on the related loans, though equity above the exemption can be at risk in Chapter 7.
How much equity can I protect in my car in Minnesota?
Up to $10,200 of equity in one motor vehicle is exempt under Minn. Stat. 550.37, subd. 12a, with higher limits of $27,000 for a vehicle regularly used by or for the benefit of a physically disabled person, $110,000 for a vehicle designed or modified to accommodate a disability, and $13,750 for a vehicle reasonably necessary for your trade or business. Subdivision 12a lets you claim one of these categories, not several. These amounts took effect July 1, 2026.
Where do I file for bankruptcy in Minnesota?
All Minnesota bankruptcy cases are filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota, which holds hearings in Minneapolis, St. Paul, Duluth, and Fergus Falls. You must complete approved credit counseling before filing.
What debts cannot be discharged in a Minnesota bankruptcy?
Most student loans (absent a showing of undue hardship), recent income taxes, child support, alimony, and debts arising from fraud generally are not discharged. Most credit-card and medical debt usually is.
Does filing bankruptcy stop a foreclosure in Minnesota?
Filing triggers the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. 362, which immediately halts most collection activity, including foreclosure and wage garnishment. Chapter 13 can also let a homeowner cure missed mortgage payments over time.
Overwhelmed by debt in Minnesota? Get a free bankruptcy consultation
Bankruptcy can stop foreclosure, wage garnishment, and creditor calls, and which debts you can clear and what property you keep depend on Minnesota's exemptions. Get a free, confidential consultation with a Minnesota bankruptcy attorney to understand your options. There is no obligation.
Updates
Updated Minnesota's exemption figures to the amounts the Department of Commerce published for July 1, 2026, including the motor-vehicle, tools-of-trade and wildcard limits, corrected the next-adjustment date to July 1, 2028, and clarified that the homestead exemption is capped per homestead and cannot be doubled by a married couple filing jointly.
Updated the homestead and household-goods exemptions to the amounts in force since July 1, 2026.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 550: EXECUTIONS, REDEMPTION, EXEMPTIONS
§ 550.371EXEMPTIONS IN JOINT BANKRUPTCYIn force
Subdivision 1. Applicable law. Except as provided in this section, the exemptions set forth in subsection (d) of section 522 of the Bankruptcy Act, United States Code, title 11, section 522(d), shall be available to residents of this state. Subd. 2. Joint petition. When spouses are joined in a petition for bankruptcy, they may jointly elect to utilize either the applicable exemption provisions pursuant to Minnesota law or pursuant to subsection (d) of section 522 of the Bankruptcy Act, United States Code, title 11, section 522(d), but not both. Subd. 3. Individual petition.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
§ 550.37PROPERTY EXEMPTIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Subdivision 1. Exemption. The property mentioned in this section is not liable to attachment, garnishment, or sale on any final process, issued from any court. Subd. 2. Sacred possessions. The Bible, Torah, Qur'an, prayer rug, and other religious items in an aggregate amount not exceeding $2,000. Subd. 2a. Library. A personal library in an aggregate amount not exceeding $750. Subd. 2b. Musical instruments. Musical instruments in an aggregate amount not exceeding $2,000. Subd. 2c. Family pets. Family pets in an aggregate amount not exceeding $1,000. Subd. 3. Pew and burial lot. A seat or pew in any house or place of public worship and a lot in any burial ground. Subd. 4. Personal goods. (a) All wearing apparel, one watch, utensils, and foodstuffs of the debtor and the debtor's family. (b) Household furniture, household appliances, radios, computers, tablets, televisions, printers, cell phones, smart phones, and other consumer electronics of the debtor and the debtor's family, not exceeding $12,150 in value. (c) The debtor's aggregate interest, not exceeding $3,308 in value, in jewelry.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 134 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re Tveten (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1987, 402 N.W.2d 551)“…ons or societies such as Lutheran Brotherhood, exempt under Minn.Stat. §§ 550.37, subd. 11 (1986) or 64B.18 (1986)?…”
- ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. Kvamme (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1995, 529 N.W.2d 335)“…vamme claimed that all funds held by Dain were exempt under Minn.Stat. § 550.37, subd. 24, and identified the exempt am…”
- Medill v. State (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1991, 477 N.W.2d 703)“…s District Court for the District of Minnesota: Does Minn.Stat. § 550.37, subd. 22 (1990), which exempts “[rjigh…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Minnesota Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 510: HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION
§ 510.02AREA AND VALUE; HOW LIMITEDIn force
Subdivision 1. Exemption. The homestead may include any quantity of land not exceeding 160 acres. The exemption per homestead, whether the exemption is claimed by one or more debtors, may not exceed $510,000 or, if the homestead is used primarily for agricultural purposes, $1,275,000, exclusive of the limitations set forth in section 510.05. Subd. 2. Adjustment of dollar amounts. The dollar amounts in subdivision 1 must change periodically in the manner provided for under section 550.37, subdivision 4a. The commissioner of commerce shall include the changes in the dollar amounts as part of the announcement and publication made under those provisions.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 52 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Title Insurance Co. of Minnesota v. Agora Leases, Inc. (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1982, 320 N.W.2d 884)“…the exemption in terms of land area. The present provision, Minn.Stat. § 510.02 (1980), provides that if a homestead is…”
- Kipp v. Sweno (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2004, 683 N.W.2d 259)“…RT, Justice. This is a case of first impression regarding Minn.Stat. § 510.02 (2002), which establishes a monetary va…”
- Baumann v. Chaska Building Center, Inc. (Court of Appeals of Minnesota 2001, 621 N.W.2d 795)“…ity, the property qualifies for a homestead exemption under Minn.Stat. § 510.02 (1998). We reverse and remand. F…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 571: GARNISHMENT
§ 571.922LIMITATION ON WAGE GARNISHMENTIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Unless the judgment is for child support, the maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any pay period subjected to garnishment may not exceed the lesser of: (1) 25 percent of the debtor's disposable earnings, if the debtor's weekly income exceeds 80 times the greater of the hourly wage described in paragraph (b); (2) 15 percent of the debtor's disposable earnings, if the debtor's weekly income exceeds 60 times, but is less than or equal to 80 times, the greater of the hourly wages described in paragraph (b); or (3) ten percent of the debtor's disposable earnings, if the debtor's weekly income exceeds 40 times, but is less than or equal to 60 times, the greater of the hourly wages described in paragraph (b). (b) The amount by which the debtor's disposable earnings exceed the greater of: (i) 40 times the hourly wage described in section 177.24, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (4); or (ii) 40 times the federal minimum hourly wages prescribed by section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, United States Code, title 29, section 206(a)(1).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Minn. Stat. 571.922 is applied as the measure of earnings exempt from garnishment. In re Seifert (2016) held farm proceeds are "earnings" under the section and applied its lesser-of comparison to fix the garnishable share. Marriage of LaFreniere-Nietz v. Nietz (1996) read it as a ceiling, not a bar to a court limiting garnishment further.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Wilson v. Commissioner of Revenue (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2003, 656 N.W.2d 547)“…approximately 25 percent of the wages owed to an employee. Minn.Stat. § 571.922(1) (1994). The notice advised HWC that…”
- Marriage of LaFreniere-Nietz v. Nietz (Court of Appeals of Minnesota 1996, 547 N.W.2d 895)✓A district court capped an ex-wife's collection of support arrears at $250 a month and barred further wage garnishment; the court held the statute's bar on orders violating this section only forbids garnishing more than the limit, leaving room for equitable restrictions.
- In re Seifert (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota 2016, 544 B.R. 670)✓A chapter 12 family farmer claimed crop-sale proceeds as exempt earnings; the bankruptcy court applied this section's lesser-of test, found the 25 percent prong smaller than the minimum-wage prong, and allowed his $91,258 exemption.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 11
§ 362Automatic stayIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a petition filed under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or an application filed under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, operates as a stay, applicable to all entities, of— the commencement or continuation, including the issuance or employment of process, of a judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been commenced before the commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under this title; the enforcement, against the debtor or against property of the estate, of a judgment obtained before the commencement of the case under this title; any act to obtain possession of property of the estate or of property from the estate or to exercise control over property of the estate; any act to create, perfect, or enforce any lien against property of the estate; any act to create, perfect, or enforce against property of the debtor any lien to the extent that such lien secures a claim that arose before the commencement of the case under this title; any act to…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 19,606 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. (1988) held that an undersecured creditor gets no interest as adequate protection under 362(d)(1) for delay caused by the stay. NLRB v. Bildisco & Bildisco (1984) applied 362(a) in requiring claims be pursued through bankruptcy administration, not suit.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Clinton v. Jones (Supreme Court of the United States 1997, 520 U.S. 681)“…ublic interests. Brief for Petitioner 34-36. See, e. g., 11 U. S. C. § 362 (litigation against debtor stayed upon…”
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. (Supreme Court of the United States 1988, 484 U.S. 365)✓An undersecured lender on a Houston apartment project sought monthly payments as the price of continuing the § 362(a) automatic stay; the Court held that 'adequate protection' under § 362(d)(1) does not entitle it to interest for the delay in foreclosing on its collateral.
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1987, 481 U.S. 1)“…if it were forced to file for bankruptcy under Chapter 11. 11 U. S. C. §362 . Texaco, or its successor in interest,…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy in Alaska (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Bankruptcy in Arizona (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Bankruptcy in Alabama (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
§ 522ExemptionsIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
In this section— “dependent” includes spouse, whether or not actually dependent; and “value” means fair market value as of the date of the filing of the petition or, with respect to property that becomes property of the estate after such date, as of the date such property becomes property of the estate. Notwithstanding section 541 of this title, an individual debtor may exempt from property of the estate the property listed in either paragraph (2) or, in the alternative, paragraph (3) of this subsection. In joint cases filed under section 302 of this title and individual cases filed under section 301 or 303 of this title by or against debtors who are husband and wife, and whose estates are ordered to be jointly administered under Rule 1015(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, one debtor may not elect to exempt property listed in paragraph (2) and the other debtor elect to exempt property listed in paragraph (3) of this subsection. If the parties cannot agree on the alternative to be elected, they shall be deemed to elect paragraph (2), where such election is permitted under the law of the jurisdiction where the case is filed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 7,574 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz (1992) held that a trustee who does not object within the 30-day period cannot later challenge an exemption claimed under 522(l), even one with no statutory basis. Owen v. Owen (1991) held that 522(f) lien avoidance is not defeated by a state exemption written to exclude lien-encumbered property.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz (Supreme Court of the United States 1992, 503 U.S. 638)✓A Chapter 7 debtor listed the entire proceeds of her TWA discrimination suit as exempt and the trustee let the 30-day objection window lapse; the Court held that under § 522(l) the property is exempt once no one objects, even absent a colorable statutory basis.
- Patterson v. Shumate (Supreme Court of the United States 1992, 504 U.S. 753)✓A debtor's $250,000 ERISA pension interest was excluded from his estate under § 541(c)(2); answering a surplusage argument, the Court read § 522(d)(10)(E) as exempting a broader set of plans, and expressly declined to decide whether § 522(b)(2)(A) also applied.
- Owen v. Owen (Supreme Court of the United States 1991, 500 U.S. 305)✓An ex-wife's judgment lien attached to a Florida condo before state law made it a homestead; the Court held § 522(f) measures impairment against the exemption the debtor would have had but for the lien, so Florida's carve-out for prior liens did not defeat avoidance.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy Laws by State (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Bankruptcy in Arkansas (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Bankruptcy in Idaho (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Minn. Stat. 510.02, Minnesota homestead exemption ($540,000 / $1,350,000 effective July 1, 2026 agricultural, 160 acres) and inflation-adjustment cross-reference(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. 550.37, Minnesota property exemptions (motor vehicle subd. 12a, household goods, tools of trade, bankruptcy wildcard) and inflation adjustment in subd. 4a(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minnesota Department of Commerce, adjusted dollar amounts for the homestead and property exemptions (effective July 1, 2024; next adjustment July 1, 2026)(mn.gov).gov
- U.S. Trustee Program, Census Bureau Median Family Income by family size, cases filed on or after April 1, 2026(justice.gov).gov
- 11 U.S.C. 522, exemptions, including the state opt-out authority in 522(b) and the federal exemption schedule in 522(d)(law.cornell.edu)
- U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota (Minneapolis, St. Paul, Duluth, Fergus Falls)(mnb.uscourts.gov).gov
- Minnesota Department of Commerce, adjusted dollar amounts for the homestead and property exemptions (updated June 29, 2026; effective July 1, 2026; next adjustment July 1, 2028)(mn.gov)
- U.S. Trustee Program, Census Bureau Median Family Income by family size, cases filed on or after July 15, 2026(justice.gov)
- Minn. Stat. 550.371, availability of the federal 522(d) exemptions to Minnesota residents and the joint-petition election rule in subd. 2(revisor.mn.gov)