Common Law Marriage in Minnesota: Is It Recognized? (2026)

Minnesota abolished the formation of new common law marriages effective April 26, 1941, under Minn. Stat. section 517.01. Any marriage in Minnesota formed after that date without a license, two witnesses, and solemnization is null and void under the plain terms of the statute. Common law marriages entered into in Minnesota before April 26, 1941, remain legally valid. Minnesota also recognizes a valid common law marriage formed in another state.

Information last verified on June 2, 2026.

Does Minnesota recognize common law marriage?

Minnesota no longer allows couples to form a common law marriage within the state. Minn. Stat. section 517.01 provides that a lawful civil marriage may be contracted only when a license has been obtained as provided by law and when the marriage is contracted in the presence of two witnesses and solemnized by one authorized, or whom one or both parties in good faith believe to be authorized, to do so. The same statute declares that marriages subsequent to April 26, 1941, not so contracted shall be null and void.

The language is unambiguous. A couple that begins cohabiting in Minnesota after April 26, 1941, reaches an informal mutual agreement to be married, and presents themselves to others as a married couple has not formed a legally valid marriage under Minnesota law. No amount of cohabitation, no joint financial arrangements, and no consistent use of a shared last name creates a marriage in Minnesota without satisfying all three statutory requirements: a license, two witnesses, and authorized solemnization.

Before April 26, 1941, Minnesota recognized common law marriages under the general common law rule, which required mutual present consent to be married, cohabitation, and public holding out as a married couple. The 1941 effective date represents the Minnesota Legislature's decision to require formal procedures going forward while protecting the validity of marriages already formed under the prior rule.

Why Minnesota abolished common law marriage in 1941

Minnesota was among the earlier states to eliminate informal marriage formation by statute. The legislative rationale for requiring a license, two witnesses, and solemnization reflects several policy goals that courts and scholars have recognized: formal procedures create a definitive public record of marital status, ensure that both parties understand the legal consequences of the relationship before it is established, reduce costly and uncertain litigation over whether a marriage was ever formed, and facilitate administration of estates, benefits programs, and tax filings.

The 1941 cutoff also reflects the social context of that period. Minnesota courts of the era had addressed contested common law marriage claims with some regularity, and the legislature chose a clean statutory rule over continued case-by-case adjudication. The null-and-void language of section 517.01 leaves no room for equitable exceptions or judicial creation of informal marriage status for post-1941 relationships.

Since 1941, the Minnesota Legislature has amended section 517.01 to reflect evolving marriage law. The most recent of those amendments was legislative, not judicial: 2013 Minn. Laws ch. 74, sec. 2, signed by the governor on May 14, 2013, rewrote the statute to define civil marriage as a civil contract between "two persons" and struck the language limiting marriage to persons of the opposite sex. The Minnesota Legislature therefore acted on its own, more than two years before the United States Supreme Court decided Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015. The statute's history line closes with that 2013 amendment. Through every one of these changes, the core requirement of license, witnesses, and solemnization, and the null-and-void consequence for noncompliance, have remained unchanged.

Pre-1941 common law marriages: what remains valid

A common law marriage formed in Minnesota before April 26, 1941, remains fully valid today. The 1941 statute operated prospectively. It did not invalidate marriages that had already been established under the prior common law rule. Minn. Stat. section 517.20 reinforces the point, providing that, subject to a narrow exception in section 517.03, all marriages contracted within Minnesota before March 1, 1979 are valid in this state. Section 517.20 does not revive anything section 517.01 voided, because an informal post-1941 relationship never became a marriage that section 517.20 could validate.

To show that a valid pre-1941 Minnesota common law marriage existed, a party must establish that the elements of a common law marriage under Minnesota's pre-1941 rule were satisfied: mutual present agreement to be married, cohabitation in Minnesota as husband and wife, and public holding out of the relationship as a marriage. All of those elements must have been in place before April 26, 1941.

Given that any pre-1941 relationship is now more than 85 years in the past, evidence of such a marriage is almost exclusively historical: deeds, titles, and property records identifying the couple as husband and wife; federal census records; old joint tax filings; death certificates, obituaries, or church records; and affidavits or estate records from the era. Courts examine the totality of the historical evidence.

A pre-1941 common law marriage dissolves only upon formal divorce, annulment, or the death of a spouse, the same as any other valid marriage.

Does Minnesota recognize a common law marriage from another state?

Yes, and a Minnesota statute says so directly. Minn. Stat. section 517.20 provides that all marriages contracted outside this state that were valid at the time of the contract, or that were subsequently validated by the laws of the place where they were contracted or by the domicile of the parties, are valid in Minnesota. A common law marriage validly formed in a state that permits it is a marriage that was valid where contracted, so section 517.20 makes it valid here.

Section 517.20 codifies the place-of-celebration rule and the common law principle of comity, under which a court recognizes a marital relationship that was validly created under the law of another jurisdiction. Recognition does not rest on the Full Faith and Credit Clause. That clause reaches the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of other states, and an informally formed common law marriage produces no license, no certificate, and no court judgment for another state to credit.

As of 2026, the states that still permit formation of new common law marriages include Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Oklahoma (contested), Rhode Island, Texas (called "informal marriage" under Tex. Fam. Code section 2.401), and Utah (which requires a court or administrative order to establish the marriage). The District of Columbia also recognizes common law marriage formation. A couple who formed a valid common law marriage in any of those jurisdictions and then moved to Minnesota retains that marital status in Minnesota.

For Minnesota purposes, a couple with a valid out-of-state common law marriage is treated as legally married. Minnesota courts and agencies apply the same rights and obligations that apply to any ceremonially solemnized marriage: divorce jurisdiction, property division under Minnesota's marital property principles, spousal maintenance eligibility under Minn. Stat. section 518.552, intestate inheritance rights under Minn. Stat. section 524.2-102, and all other incidents of the marital relationship.

To invoke Minnesota recognition of an out-of-state common law marriage, the party asserting the marriage must show that the marriage met all the requirements of the state where it was formed. For example, a couple asserting a Colorado common law marriage must establish that they met the requirements of Colo. Rev. Stat. section 14-2-109.5, including mutual agreement, cohabitation in Colorado, and public representation of the marriage.

How to prove a common law marriage formed in another state

Because a common law marriage leaves no license or official certificate, the burden of proving its existence falls on the party asserting it. The specific elements and the standard of proof are determined by the law of the state where the marriage was formed. Minnesota courts evaluating an out-of-state common law marriage will look to the same types of evidence that the forming state's courts would consider.

Evidence commonly considered includes:

• Joint federal or state income tax returns filed as "married filing jointly" or "married filing separately"
• Joint bank accounts, joint mortgage or lease agreements, or jointly titled property
• Life insurance policies or retirement account beneficiary designations listing the other party as a spouse
• Loan applications, government forms, or employer benefit documents identifying the relationship as a marriage
• Testimony from family members, friends, neighbors, coworkers, or members of the couple's religious community who regarded them as married
• Written correspondence, social media records, cards, or other documents in which the parties referred to each other as husband, wife, or spouse
• Use of a shared last name or joint use of both last names
• Affidavits signed by both parties or by knowledgeable third parties acknowledging the marriage

No single item is conclusive. Courts assess the totality of the circumstances against the requirements of the state where the marriage was allegedly formed.

The 7-year myth

A persistent belief holds that living together for 7 years automatically creates a common law marriage. This is false in every state in the United States, including Minnesota. No state, including the states that still permit common law marriage formation, sets a minimum number of years of cohabitation as a requirement or automatic trigger.

The states that allow common law marriage formation focus on intent and conduct: a present mutual agreement to be married, cohabitation in the permitting state, and public representation of the marital relationship. Duration of cohabitation may be relevant as circumstantial evidence of intent, but no specific number of years creates a marriage by itself.

In Minnesota, this myth is especially easy to dispel because the state has not allowed common law marriage formation at all for any relationship beginning after April 26, 1941. A couple that has cohabited in Minnesota for 7, 17, or 47 years without a license, witnesses, and solemnization has not formed a valid marriage under Minnesota law.

How a common law marriage ends in Minnesota

A valid common law marriage, wherever it was formed, can only be terminated by a formal legal divorce, annulment, or the death of a spouse. Minnesota law provides no mechanism for informally dissolving a marriage, and there is no such thing as a "common law divorce."

Simply separating, dividing shared property, or ceasing to live together does not end a legal marriage. A Minnesota resident who holds a valid out-of-state common law marriage and later "separates" without filing for divorce remains legally married under Minnesota law. Attempting to remarry in Minnesota without having first obtained a divorce would create a void or voidable second marriage.

Divorce proceedings in Minnesota to dissolve a valid out-of-state common law marriage proceed under Minnesota law in the same manner as any other dissolution action. The court applies Minnesota's marital property and dissolution rules, including the spousal maintenance factors under Minn. Stat. section 518.552, and the same residency and jurisdictional requirements that apply to any Minnesota divorce.

For more on the financial consequences of ending a Minnesota marriage, see Minnesota alimony laws and Minnesota child support laws.

For a state-by-state comparison of which states recognize common law marriage, see Common law marriage by state.

---

Disclaimer: This page provides general legal information about common law marriage in Minnesota and is not legal advice. Marriage and family law determinations are fact-specific and depend on the individual circumstances of each case. This information was verified as of June 2, 2026. Consult a licensed Minnesota family law attorney for advice about your specific situation.

Last updated: June 2, 2026.

More Minnesota Laws

• Minnesota Alimony Laws
• Minnesota Divorce Laws