Arizona
Arizona Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 12 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Arizona healthcare providers must retain adult patient medical records for at least six years after the last date of service under A.R.S. § 12-2297. Records for minor patients must be kept for three years after the patient turns 18 or six years after the last service date, whichever is later.
Overview of Arizona Medical Records Retention Laws
Last verified: March 2026. This page reflects current Arizona Revised Statutes Title 12, Chapter 13, Article 7.1 and Title 32, Chapter 31.

Table of Contents
- Overview of Arizona Medical Records Retention Laws
- General Retention Period: 6 Years for Adult Patients
- Records for Minor Patients
- Nursing Care Institutions
- Source Data Retention
- How HIPAA Interacts with Arizona Retention Law
- CMS and Medicare Retention Requirements
- Patient Access Rights in Arizona
- Fees for Medical Record Copies
- Proper Destruction of Medical Records
- Practice Closure and Sale Requirements
- Electronic Medical Records Considerations
- Statute of Limitations Considerations
- Consequences of Noncompliance
- Frequently Asked Questions
Arizona law establishes specific minimum timeframes for how long healthcare providers must keep patient medical records. The primary statute governing this area is A.R.S. § 12-2297, which sits within Title 12, Chapter 13, Article 7.1 of the Arizona Revised Statutes.
These retention requirements apply broadly to all healthcare providers operating in the state, including physicians, dentists, chiropractors, physical therapists, naturopathic doctors, and other licensed professionals. The rules serve two critical purposes: protecting patients who may need their records for ongoing treatment or legal matters, and protecting providers who may need records to defend against malpractice claims.
Arizona's retention framework also intersects with federal law in important ways. Providers who participate in Medicare, accept federal funding, or fall under HIPAA's reach face additional obligations that can extend beyond what state law alone requires.
General Retention Period: 6 Years for Adult Patients
Under A.R.S. § 12-2297, healthcare providers in Arizona must retain the original or copies of a patient's medical records for at least six years after the last date the adult patient received medical or healthcare services from that provider.
The six-year clock starts on the date of the patient's most recent visit or service, not the date the record was created. This distinction matters because a patient who visits a provider repeatedly over many years will have older records that remain subject to retention based on the most recent encounter.
For example, if a patient first visited a physician in 2018 and their last appointment was in January 2024, the provider must keep all of that patient's records until at least January 2030.
The phrase "unless otherwise required by statute or by federal law" at the beginning of the statute is significant. It means that other Arizona statutes or federal regulations can impose longer retention periods for specific types of records, and providers must follow whichever requirement is strictest.
| Patient Type | Minimum Retention Period | Statute |
|---|---|---|
| Adult patients | 6 years after last date of service | A.R.S. § 12-2297(A)(1) |
| Minor patients | 3 years after age 18 OR 6 years after last service (whichever is later) | A.R.S. § 12-2297(A)(2) |
| Nursing care institution patients | 6 years after discharge | A.R.S. § 12-2297(D) |
| Source data | 6 years from date of collection | A.R.S. § 12-2297(A)(3) |
Records for Minor Patients
Arizona provides special protections for medical records belonging to children. Under A.R.S. § 12-2297(A)(2), if the patient is a child, the provider must retain records for whichever period is longer:
- At least three years after the child's eighteenth birthday, or
- At least six years after the last date the child received medical or healthcare services
The "whichever is later" language is critical. Providers need to calculate both dates and use the one that falls further in the future.
Consider a child who was last treated at age 10 in 2020. Under the six-year rule, retention would expire in 2026. Under the age-based rule, the child turns 18 in 2028, and three years after that is 2031. Because 2031 is later, the provider must keep the records until at least 2031.
Conversely, if a 16-year-old received treatment in 2024, the six-year rule would require retention until 2030. The age-based rule would require retention until 2027 (three years after turning 18 in 2024). In this case, the six-year rule controls because 2030 is later.
This dual-calculation approach ensures that minors always have access to their childhood medical records for a reasonable period after reaching adulthood.
Nursing Care Institutions
Nursing care institutions, as defined in A.R.S. § 36-401, follow a slightly different retention trigger. Under A.R.S. § 12-2297(D), these facilities must retain patient records for six years after the date of the patient's discharge.
The discharge date replaces the "last date of service" trigger used for other providers. For minor patients in nursing care settings, the same dual-calculation rule applies: the facility retains records for whichever is longer between three years after the child turns 18 or six years after discharge.
This provision recognizes the unique nature of nursing care settings where patients may have extended stays and where discharge represents a clear end point for the provider-patient relationship.
Source Data Retention
A.R.S. § 12-2297(A)(3) addresses source data separately. Source data may be maintained separately from the medical record itself, but the provider must retain it for six years from the date of collection.

Source data includes raw test results, diagnostic imaging files, lab work, and other primary data that forms the basis for entries in the medical record. The six-year retention period runs from when the data was collected, not from the patient's last visit. This can create situations where source data from early in a treatment relationship expires before the overall medical record retention obligation ends.
Providers should be aware that while Arizona law permits maintaining source data separately, they should ensure their record management systems track retention deadlines for both the medical record and associated source data.
How HIPAA Interacts with Arizona Retention Law
The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) does not establish its own medical records retention period. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the HIPAA Privacy Rule defers to state law on how long medical records must be kept.
However, HIPAA does impose two important requirements that apply alongside Arizona's retention rules:
HIPAA Documentation Retention (6 Years)
While HIPAA does not set a retention period for medical records themselves, it does require covered entities to retain HIPAA-related documentation for six years. Under 45 C.F.R. § 164.530(j), covered entities must retain policies, procedures, notices of privacy practices, disposition of complaints, and other actions or documentation required by the Privacy Rule for six years from the date of creation or the date when the document was last in effect, whichever is later.
This means that Arizona providers who are HIPAA-covered entities (which includes most healthcare providers who transmit health information electronically) must maintain two parallel retention timelines: one for the medical records under A.R.S. § 12-2297 and one for HIPAA compliance documentation under 45 C.F.R. § 164.530(j).
Safeguards During Retention
HIPAA requires appropriate administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to protect the privacy of medical records throughout the entire retention period. This means Arizona providers cannot simply store old records in an unsecured location. The same protections that apply to active patient files also apply to records being stored solely for retention compliance.
CMS and Medicare Retention Requirements
Healthcare providers who participate in Medicare face additional federal recordkeeping requirements through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Those rules are narrower than they are usually described.
Under 42 C.F.R. § 424.516(f), a provider or supplier that furnishes covered ordered, certified, referred, or prescribed Part A or B services, items or drugs must maintain the documentation relating to those written orders, certifications, referrals, prescriptions and requests for payment for seven years from the date of service, and must give CMS or a Medicare contractor access to it on request. The same seven-year obligation falls on the physician or other eligible professional who wrote the order, certification, referral or prescription.
That is a documentation requirement attached to ordered and referred items and services. It is not a general Medicare retention period for the medical record as a whole, and it does not displace Arizona's six-year rule. In practice an Arizona provider keeps the full medical record for at least six years under A.R.S. § 12-2297 and keeps the ordering, certification, referral and prescription documentation for seven years.
Medicare Part D plan sponsors agree to maintain books, records, documents and other evidence of accounting procedures and practices for 10 years under 42 C.F.R. § 423.505(d). That obligation covers financial and administrative records rather than patient medical records.
| Requirement | Retention Period | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona state law (adults) | 6 years from last service | A.R.S. § 12-2297(A)(1) |
| HIPAA compliance documents | 6 years from creation or last effective date | 45 C.F.R. § 164.530(j) |
| Medicare documentation of ordered, certified, referred or prescribed Part A/B items and services | 7 years from date of service | 42 C.F.R. § 424.516(f) |
| Medicare Part D sponsor books and records | 10 years | 42 C.F.R. § 423.505(d) |
A.R.S. § 12-2297 explicitly defers to longer federal requirements with its "unless otherwise required by federal law" language, so an Arizona provider follows the federal period wherever a federal rule reaches further than six years. For most Arizona practices that means the six-year state minimum governs the medical record itself, and the seven-year federal clock applies to the ordering and referral documentation described in § 424.516(f).
Patient Access Rights in Arizona
Arizona law grants patients a clear right to access their own medical records. Under A.R.S. § 12-2293, on the written request of a patient or the patient's healthcare decision maker, the provider in possession of the records must provide access to or copies of those records.
Patients may submit their requests electronically if the provider's notice of privacy practices or website explains how to do so.
When Providers Can Deny Access
A.R.S. § 12-2293 permits providers to deny access in limited circumstances, including when:
- Providing access would endanger the patient's safety
- Disclosure would cause substantial harm to a third party
- Releasing the information would compromise confidential sources
- Access would interfere with correctional facility security
When a provider denies access, they must document the determination and provide the patient with a written explanation. The provider must still release any portions of the record that are not subject to a valid denial basis.
HIPAA's 30-Day Deadline
Under federal HIPAA rules at 45 C.F.R. § 164.524, covered entities must respond to access requests within 30 calendar days. If additional time is needed, the provider may take up to one 30-day extension (for a total of 60 days), but they must notify the patient in writing of the delay and the expected completion date within the initial 30-day window.
HHS has emphasized that the 30-day period is an outer limit; providers should respond as quickly as possible.
Fees for Medical Record Copies
Under A.R.S. § 12-2295, providers may charge a "reasonable fee" for reproducing medical records and may require advance payment.
However, Arizona law prohibits providers from charging fees in several important situations:
- Continuity of care: Providers cannot charge when sending records to another healthcare provider for the purpose of continuing the patient's care.
- Patient seeking healthcare: Providers cannot charge the patient when the demonstrated purpose is obtaining healthcare.
- Healthcare decision makers: No fee applies when the patient's authorized decision maker requests records for care purposes.
- Regulatory boards: The Arizona Medical Board, Board of Osteopathic Examiners, and health department officials receive records without charge.
- Social Security appeals: A patient or the patient's legal representative appealing a denial of Social Security benefits receives the records free of charge. A repeat request, or a request for records already provided free in the same calendar year, is subject to a reasonable fee, except that no fee may be charged if no records are located in response to that request. A legal representative must supply an appointment of representative form SSA-1696 before obtaining the records free of charge.
The "no records located" exception is written into § 12-2295(B)(5) and is tied to those Social Security appeal requests. It is not a general rule covering every records request.
The statute does not set a specific per-page dollar amount. Instead, it requires that fees be "reasonable," which gives providers discretion within legal bounds.
Proper Destruction of Medical Records
Once the retention period expires, Arizona providers are not required to keep records indefinitely. However, the method of destruction matters significantly under both state and federal law.
Arizona Requirements
Under A.R.S. § 32-3211, health professionals must have a written protocol that includes procedures for disposing of unclaimed medical records after a specified period of time and after making good-faith efforts to contact the patient.
This means providers cannot simply shred records on the expiration date without first attempting to notify patients and give them an opportunity to obtain copies.
HIPAA Destruction Standards
The HHS Office for Civil Rights requires covered entities to implement reasonable safeguards when disposing of protected health information (PHI). While HIPAA does not mandate a specific destruction method, it prohibits disposal in locations accessible to the public, such as open dumpsters or public recycling bins.
Acceptable destruction methods include:
- Paper records: Shredding, burning, pulping, or pulverizing
- Electronic media: Clearing (overwriting with non-sensitive data), purging (degaussing), or physically destroying the media (disintegration, melting, incinerating, or shredding)
- Third-party vendors: Providers may hire a business associate to handle destruction, but a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) must be in place under HIPAA
Providers should maintain a record of destruction activities, including the date, method, and description of records destroyed, even though HIPAA does not explicitly require a destruction log.
Practice Closure and Sale Requirements
When an Arizona healthcare provider retires, closes, or sells their practice, patient records do not simply disappear. A.R.S. § 12-2297(B) requires providers to take "reasonable measures" to ensure records remain retained for the full statutory period.
Notification Obligation
Under A.R.S. § 32-3211, if a health professional terminates or sells their practice and patient records will not remain in the same physical location, the provider must notify each patient in a timely manner before the termination or sale. The notice must inform patients about:
- The future location of their medical records
- How the patient can access those records
Transfer to New Provider
When a practice is sold, the purchasing provider typically assumes responsibility for maintaining the existing patient records. The sale agreement should clearly address record custody, ongoing retention obligations, and access procedures.
Records Custodian Options
Providers who close a practice without transferring to a successor have several options:
- Contracting with a medical records custodian service to store and manage records for the remaining retention period
- Transferring records to another local provider who agrees to maintain them
- Arranging with a hospital or health system to house the records
Regardless of the approach, the retiring or closing provider retains ultimate responsibility for ensuring compliance with retention requirements.
Written Protocol Requirement
A.R.S. § 32-3211 requires health professionals to maintain a written protocol for secure storage, transfer, and access of medical records. This protocol must be confirmed during relicensure. Providers who cannot demonstrate a compliant protocol face disciplinary action for unprofessional conduct.
The section carries two exemptions that matter in practice. Subsection F provides that "health professional does not include a veterinarian," and subsection G provides that the section "does not apply to a health professional who is employed by a health care institution as defined in section 36-401 that is responsible for the maintenance of the medical records." That second exemption covers most hospital-employed clinicians, whose employing institution carries the protocol obligation instead.
Electronic Medical Records Considerations
Arizona law permits providers to retain either originals or copies of medical records, which includes electronic formats. A.R.S. § 12-2297 does not distinguish between paper and electronic storage, and there is no single Arizona statute imposing a format standard on every licensed health professional.
Individual professions do carry their own recordkeeping rules, and those rules are easy to over-read. A.R.S. § 32-1264 sits in the dental practice chapter of Title 32 and applies only to people licensed or certified under that chapter (dentists, dental therapists, dental hygienists and denturists) and to registered dental business entities. Those licensees must make "legible permanent and contemporaneous written or electronic records" of all diagnoses, evaluations and treatments, and their electronic records "must be retrievable in paper form." Providers in other professions should check the statutes and rules of their own licensing board rather than assume that standard reaches them.
Providers storing records electronically should ensure their systems include:
- Adequate backup and disaster recovery procedures
- Access controls that comply with HIPAA Security Rule requirements
- Audit trails documenting who accessed or modified records
- The ability to produce paper copies on demand
- A migration plan for when software systems are upgraded or replaced
The retention period for electronic records is the same as for paper records. Switching from paper to electronic storage does not reset or alter the retention timeline.
Statute of Limitations Considerations
Although not directly part of the records retention statute, Arizona's statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims has practical implications for how long providers may want to keep records.
Under A.R.S. § 12-542, the general statute of limitations for personal injury claims (including medical malpractice) is two years from when the cause of action accrues. However, the discovery rule can delay the start of this clock if the injury was not immediately apparent.
For minors, the statute of limitations is typically tolled (paused) until the child reaches age 18, which means a malpractice claim could potentially be filed years after treatment.
Because of these variables, many legal professionals recommend retaining records beyond the minimum statutory period, particularly for pediatric patients. The six-year retention minimum under A.R.S. § 12-2297 provides a reasonable baseline, but providers treating children or handling high-risk procedures may want to consider longer voluntary retention.
Consequences of Noncompliance
Arizona takes medical records retention seriously. Under A.R.S. § 32-3211(D), a health professional who does not comply with the medical records protocol requirements commits an act of unprofessional conduct.
Unprofessional conduct can trigger disciplinary proceedings by the provider's licensing board, which may result in:
- Formal reprimand or censure
- Required continuing education
- Practice restrictions or supervision requirements
- License suspension or revocation in severe cases
Additionally, under A.R.S. § 32-3211, health professionals must confirm compliance with their written medical records protocol during relicensure. Failure to maintain a compliant protocol is itself grounds for disciplinary action.
Beyond state licensing consequences, providers who are HIPAA-covered entities also face potential federal enforcement for improper destruction or failure to safeguard records during the retention period. HHS Office for Civil Rights penalties for HIPAA violations can range from $145 to $2,190,294 per violation category per year, under the inflation-adjusted tiers effective January 28, 2026.
Employee vs. Practice Owner Responsibility
A.R.S. § 12-2297(C) provides an important distinction: a person licensed under Title 32 who works as an employee of a healthcare provider is not responsible for storing or retaining medical records. However, employees remain responsible for compiling and recording patient information in the customary manner. The storage and retention obligation falls on the practice owner or the entity that employs the provider.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do doctors in Arizona have to keep medical records?
Under A.R.S. § 12-2297(A)(1), Arizona healthcare providers must retain adult patient medical records for at least 6 years after the last date of service. For minor patients, § 12-2297(A)(2) requires records to be kept for 3 years after the child turns 18 or 6 years after the last service date, whichever is later. Medicare providers and suppliers also have a separate, narrower federal duty under 42 C.F.R. § 424.516(f) to keep documentation of ordered, certified, referred and prescribed Part A or B services for 7 years from the date of service. That federal rule covers ordering and referral documentation rather than the medical record as a whole.
Can I get copies of my old medical records in Arizona?
Yes. Under A.R.S. § 12-2293, patients have the right to request access to or copies of their medical records by submitting a written request. Providers may charge a reasonable fee for copies, but they cannot charge when records are being sent to another provider for continuity of care, when you need them for obtaining healthcare, or when you or your legal representative need them to appeal a denial of Social Security benefits. Under HIPAA, providers must respond within 30 days.
What happens to my medical records if my doctor retires or closes their practice in Arizona?
Under A.R.S. § 12-2297(B) and A.R.S. § 32-3211, a provider who retires, closes, or sells their practice must take reasonable measures to ensure records are retained for the full statutory period. The provider must also notify each patient before the closure about where their records will be located and how to access them. Many providers transfer records to another local provider or hire a medical records custodian service.
Does HIPAA require medical records to be kept for a certain number of years?
No. HIPAA does not set a medical records retention period. According to HHS, the HIPAA Privacy Rule defers to state laws on retention. However, HIPAA does require covered entities to retain HIPAA compliance documentation (policies, privacy notices, complaint records) for 6 years. HIPAA also requires appropriate safeguards to protect records throughout their retention and proper destruction methods when records are disposed of.
How should medical records be destroyed in Arizona after the retention period expires?
Arizona law under A.R.S. § 32-3211 requires health professionals to have a written destruction protocol and to make good-faith efforts to contact patients before destroying unclaimed records. That section does not apply to veterinarians, or to a health professional employed by a health care institution that is itself responsible for maintaining the records. Under HIPAA, paper records should be shredded, burned, pulped, or pulverized. Electronic records should be cleared, purged (degaussed), or physically destroyed. Records cannot be placed in public dumpsters or recycling bins. Providers may hire a business associate to handle destruction under a BAA.
Updates
Corrected the statutory subsections cited for minor-patient and source-data retention, narrowed the federal Medicare seven-year rule to the ordering and referral documentation it actually covers, scoped the dental recordkeeping statute and the fee exception for requests that return no records to the licensees and requests they actually apply to, and added the two exemptions built into Arizona's written-protocol requirement.
Fixed a HIPAA regulation link that pointed to the wrong section of the Code of Federal Regulations, and updated the HIPAA civil penalty dollar figures to the current amounts effective January 28, 2026.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected two misattributed statute citations: the unprofessional-conduct penalty is A.R.S. § 32-3211(D), not § 12-2297(F) (which has no subsection F); the employee-liability exemption is A.R.S. § 12-2297(C), not (E).
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 12 (Courts and Civil Proceedings), Chapter 13 (EVIDENCE), Article 7.1 (Medical Records)
§ 12-2297Retention of recordsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A. Unless otherwise required by statute or by federal law, a health care provider shall retain the original or copies of a patient's medical records as follows: 1. If the patient is an adult, for at least six years after the last date the adult patient received medical or health care services from that provider. 2. If the patient is a child, either for at least three years after the child's eighteenth birthday or for at least six years after the last date the child received medical or health care services from that provider, whichever date occurs later. 3. Source data may be maintained separately from the medical record and must be retained for six years from the date of collection of the source data. B. When a health care provider retires or sells the provider's practice the provider shall take reasonable measures to ensure that the provider's records are retained pursuant to this section. C. A person who is licensed pursuant to title 32 as an employee of a health care provider is not responsible for storing or retaining medical records but shall compile and record the records in the customary manner. D.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-07 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2007
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Smyser v. City of Peoria (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2007, 215 Ariz. 428)“…inal copies of a patient’s medical record. See A.R.S. § 12-2297 (2005). She also cited State v.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How Long Do Hospitals Keep Medical Records? (2026)
§ 12-2293Release of medical records and payment records to patients and health care decision makers; definitionIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A. Except as provided in subsections B and C of this section, on the written request of a patient or the patient's health care decision maker for access to or copies of the patient's medical records and payment records, the health care provider in possession of the record shall provide access to or copies of the records to the patient or the patient's health care decision maker. B. A health care provider may deny a request for access to or copies of medical records or payment records if a health professional determines that either: 1. Access by the patient is reasonably likely to endanger the life or physical safety of the patient or another person. 2. The records make reference to a person other than a health professional and access by the patient or the patient's health care decision maker is reasonably likely to cause substantial harm to that other person. 3. Access by the patient's health care decision maker is reasonably likely to cause substantial harm to the patient or another person. 4.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Santoro v. Santoro (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2019)“…argument that the court excluded Dr. Mandel’s letter under A.R.S. § 12-2293(B)(3), which allows a heath care provid…”
- Borges313886 v. Napier (District Court, D. Arizona 2019)“…ctly from his provider without the need for a subpoena. See A.R.S. § 12-2293(A) 3 (“[T]he health care provider in…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Medical Recording Laws: Patient Rights and HIPAA Rules
§ 12-2295ChargesIn force
A. Except as otherwise provided by law, a health care provider or contractor may charge a person who requests reproductions of medical records or payment records a reasonable fee for the reproduction of the records pursuant to this section. Except as necessary for continuity of care, a health care provider or contractor may require the payment of any fees in advance. B. A health care provider or contractor shall not charge for the pertinent information contained in medical records provided to: 1. Another health care provider for the purpose of providing continuing care to the patient to whom the medical record pertains. 2. The patient to whom the medical record pertains for the demonstrated purpose of obtaining health care. 3. The health care decision maker of the patient to whom the medical record pertains for the demonstrated purpose of obtaining health care for the patient. 4. The Arizona medical board, the Arizona board of osteopathic examiners in medicine and surgery or an officer of the department of health services or the local health department requesting records pursuant to section 36-662. 5.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2004
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Chartone, Inc. v. Mercaldo, Ltd. Webb, Pc. Durazzo & Eckel Smart Professional (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2004)“…sed on plaintiffs’ allegation that defendants had violated A.R.S. § 12-22951 by charging unreasonable fees for the…”
- ChartOne, Inc. v. Bernini (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2004, 207 Ariz. 162)“…ecords a reasonable fee for the production of the records.” A.R.S. § 12-2295(A). 2 . Noting the…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 12-2294Release of medical records and payment records to third partiesIn force
A. A health care provider shall disclose medical records or payment records, or the information contained in medical records or payment records, without the patient's written authorization as otherwise required by law or when ordered by a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction. B. A health care provider may disclose medical records or payment records, or the information contained in medical records or payment records, pursuant to written authorization signed by the patient or the patient's health care decision maker. C. A health care provider may disclose medical records or payment records or the information contained in medical records or payment records and a clinical laboratory may disclose clinical laboratory results without the written authorization of the patient or the patient's health care decision maker as otherwise authorized by state or federal law, including the health insurance portability and accountability act privacy standards (45 Code of Federal Regulations part 160 and part 164, subpart E), or as follows: 1. To health care providers who are currently providing health care to the patient for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment of the patient. 2.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- JAMES v. BANNER HEALTH (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2026)“…which requested the decedent’s medical records pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-2294(D). The statute permits a health care p…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 32 (Professions and Occupations), Chapter 32 (HEALTH PROFESSIONALS), Article 1 (General Provisions)
§ 32-3211Medical records; protocol; unprofessional conduct; corrective action; exemptionsIn force
A. A health professional must prepare a written protocol for the secure storage, transfer and access of the medical records of the health professional's patients. At a minimum the protocol must specify: 1. If the health professional terminates or sells the health professional's practice and the patient's medical records will not remain in the same physical location, the procedure by which the health professional shall notify each patient in a timely manner before the health professional terminates or sells the health professional's practice in order to inform the patient regarding the future location of the patient's medical records and how the patient can access those records. 2. The procedure by which the health professional may dispose of unclaimed medical records after a specified period of time and after the health professional has made good faith efforts to contact the patient. 3. How the health professional shall timely respond to requests from patients for copies of their medical records or to access their medical records. B.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 36 (Public Health and Safety), Chapter 4 (HEALTH CARE INSTITUTIONS), Article 1 (General Provisions)
§ 36-401Definitions; adult foster careIn force
A. In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: 1. "Accredited health care institution" means a health care institution, other than a hospital, that is currently accredited by a nationally recognized accreditation organization. 2. "Accredited hospital" means a hospital that is currently accredited by a nationally recognized organization on hospital accreditation. 3. "Adult behavioral health therapeutic home" means a residence for individuals who are at least eighteen years of age, have behavioral health issues and need behavioral health services that does all of the following for those individuals: (a) Provides room and board. (b) Assists in acquiring daily living skills. (c) Coordinates transportation to scheduled appointments. (d) Monitors behaviors. (e) Assists in the self-administration of medication. (f) Provides feedback to case managers related to behavior. 4. "Adult day health care facility" means a facility that provides adult day health services during a portion of a continuous twenty-four-hour period for compensation on a regular basis for five or more adults who are not related to the proprietor. 5.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Sanders v. Novick (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1986, 151 Ariz. 606)“…d health care institution in violation of the provisions of A.R.S. §§ 36-401, et seq. The cease and des…”
- People of Faith, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1992, 171 Ariz. 140)“…residential care institution” within the meaning of former A.R.S. § 36-401(26) (now subsection (32)). As a first a…”
- Rasmussen by Mitchell v. Fleming (Arizona Supreme Court 1987, 154 Ariz. 207)“…ons (A.R.S. §§ 20-821 et seq. ), health care institutions (A.R.S. §§ 36-401 et seq. ), and physicians, surgeons, a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 12 (Courts and Civil Proceedings), Chapter 5 (LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS), Article 3 (Personal Actions)
§ 12-542Injury to person; injury when death ensues; injury to property; conversion of property; forcible entry and forcible detainer; two year limitationIn forcecited in 11 of our articles
Except as provided in section 12-551 there shall be commenced and prosecuted within two years after the cause of action accrues, and not afterward, the following actions: 1. For injuries done to the person of another including causes of action for medical malpractice as defined in section 12-561. 2. For injuries done to the person of another when death ensues from such injuries, which action shall be considered as accruing at the death of the party injured. 3. For trespass for injury done to the estate or the property of another. 4. For taking or carrying away the goods and chattels of another. 5. For detaining the personal property of another and for converting such property to one's own use. 6. For forcible entry or forcible detainer, which action shall be considered as accruing at the commencement of the forcible entry or detainer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 497 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kenyon v. Hammer (Arizona Supreme Court 1984, 142 Ariz. 69)“…es at the date of death and is barred two years thereafter. A.R.S. § 12-542(2). Plaintiff argues that Count I of th…”
- Walk v. Ring (Arizona Supreme Court 2002, 202 Ariz. 310)“…rtant, if not irrelevant. 2 The text of A.R.S. § 12-542 reads in pertinent part as follows:…”
- Florez v. Sargeant (Arizona Supreme Court 1996, 185 Ariz. 521)“…informed Gomez of the two year statute of limitations under A.R.S. § 12-542 and that it was the position of the Dio…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Arizona Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim, Medical Malpractice Laws in Arizona (2026): Deadlines & Caps
Code of Federal Regulations Title 45
§ 164.530Administrative requirements.In forcecited in 40 of our articles
(a)(1) Standard: Personnel designations. (i) A covered entity must designate a privacy official who is responsible for the development and implementation of the policies and procedures of the entity. (ii) A covered entity must designate a contact person or office who is responsible for receiving complaints under this section and who is able to provide further information about matters covered by the notice required by § 164.520. (2) Implementation specification: Personnel designations. A covered entity must document the personnel designations in paragraph (a)(1) of this section as required by paragraph (j) of this section. (b)(1) Standard: Training. A covered entity must train all members of its workforce on the policies and procedures with respect to protected health information required by this subpart and subpart D of this part, as necessary and appropriate for the members of the workforce to carry out their functions within the covered entity. (2) Implementation specifications: Training.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Surprise v. Innovation Group, Inc. (2013) applied 45 CFR 164.530(c), noting it requires appropriate safeguards but does not specify what they must be, and rejected a wrongful discharge claim resting on it. Baum v. KEYSTONE MERCY HEALTH PLAN (2011) treated the same duty as background to state tort claims and remanded.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Baum v. KEYSTONE MERCY HEALTH PLAN (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2011, 826 F. Supp. 2d 718)✓A lost flash drive exposed health data on 280,000 insured children, and a parent sued in state court for negligence per se. The court held that resting the claim on the HIPAA safeguard rule at 45 C.F.R. 164.530(c)(2)(i) raised no substantial federal question, and remanded.
- Surprise v. Innovation Group, Inc. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 2013, 925 F. Supp. 2d 134)✓An employee fired after complaining that health-information documents went into unsecured trash sued for wrongful discharge. The court read 45 C.F.R. 164.530(c) to require safeguards without prescribing a method, and held HIPAA disposal rules are not well-defined public policy.
- Michael Terpin v. at and T Mobility LLC (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2024, 118 F.4th 1102)“…viders to protect patients’ “protected health information.” 45 C.F.R. § 164.530(c)(1); Moore, 299 Cal. Rptr. 3d at 561.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Medical Records Retention Laws by State (2026 Guide), Alaska Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), Arkansas Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 164.524Access of individuals to protected health information.In forcecited in 25 of our articles
(a) Standard: Access to protected health information —(1) Right of access. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this section, an individual has a right of access to inspect and obtain a copy of protected health information about the individual in a designated record set, for as long as the protected health information is maintained in the designated record set, except for: (i) Psychotherapy notes; and (ii) Information compiled in reasonable anticipation of, or for use in, a civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding. (2) Unreviewable grounds for denial. A covered entity may deny an individual access without providing the individual an opportunity for review, in the following circumstances. (i) The protected health information is excepted from the right of access by paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 88 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Webb v. Smart Document Solutions, LLC (2007) held the reduced, cost-based fee in section 164.524(c)(4) applies only when the individual himself requests his records, not a law firm acting as his agent. Ciox Health, LLC v. Hargan (2020) vacated 2016 guidance that extended that patient rate to third-party directives.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Webb v. Smart Document Solutions, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2007, 499 F.3d 1078)✓A law firm ordered its client's hospital records and was billed a copying company's higher third-party rate; the Ninth Circuit held Section 164.524(c)(4)'s cost-based fee limit applies only when the individual or a personal representative asks, not an attorney acting as agent.
- Evenson v. Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance (District Court, M.D. Florida 2007, 244 F.R.D. 666)✓A therapist refused a subpoena for her psychotherapy notes, citing Section 164.524(a)(1)'s exclusion of those notes from a patient's right of access; the court held that exclusion governs only individual access, not discovery, and ordered the notes produced.
- Ciox Health, LLC v. Hargan (District Court, District of Columbia 2020)“…fee that can be charged for such production. See generally 45 C.F.R. § 164.524. For requests brought by an individual…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to Find Old Medical Records Online, Medical Records Retention Laws by State (2026 Guide), Kentucky Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
Code of Federal Regulations Title 42
§ 424.516Additional provider and supplier requirements for enrolling and maintaining active enrollment status in the Medicare program.In forcecited in 15 of our articles
(a) Certifying compliance. CMS enrolls and maintains an active enrollment status for a provider or supplier when that provider or supplier certifies that it meets, and continues to meet, and CMS verifies that it meets, and continues to meet, all of the following requirements: (1) Compliance with title XVIII of the Act and applicable Medicare regulations. (2) Compliance with Federal and State licensure, certification, and regulatory requirements, as required, based on the type of services or supplies the provider or supplier type will furnish and bill Medicare. (3) Not employing or contracting with individuals or entities that meet either of the following conditions: (i) Excluded from participation in any Federal health care programs, for the provision of items and services covered under the programs, in violation of section 1128A(a)(6) of the Act. (ii) Debarred by the General Services Administration (GSA) from any other Executive Branch procurement or nonprocurement programs or activities, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition and Streamlining Act of 1994, and with the HHS Common Rule at 45 CFR part 76.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States Ex Rel. Westmoreland v. Amgen, Inc. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 2011, 812 F. Supp. 2d 39)“…recon *52 dition of payment can be found in 42 C.F.R. § 424.516 (a)(1), which states that “CMS enrolls…”
- Johnson v. Kelly (District Court, W.D. Oklahoma 2024)“…care laws, regulations, and program instructions. Id. ¶ 22; 42 C.F.R. § 424.516(a). To that end, a healthcare provider…”
- LILIA GOROVITS, M.D., P.C. v. AZAR (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2021)“…2 Pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.516(d)(1)(ii), Medicare physicians are requ…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Louisiana Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), Mississippi Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide), New York Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 423.505Contract provisions.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) General rule. The contract between the Part D plan sponsor and CMS must contain the provisions specified in paragraph (b) of this section. (b) Requirements for contracts. The Part D plan sponsor agrees to— (1) All the applicable requirements and conditions set forth in this part and in general instructions. (2) Accept new enrollments, make enrollments effective, process voluntary disenrollments, and limit involuntary disenrollments, as provided in subpart B of this part. (3) Comply with the prohibition in § 423.34(a) on discrimination in beneficiary enrollment. (4) Provide the basic prescription drug coverage as defined under § 423.100 and, to the extent applicable, supplemental benefits as defined in § 423.100. (Fallback entities may offer only standard prescription drug coverage as specified in § 423.855.) (5) Disclose information to beneficiaries in the manner and the form specified by CMS under § 423.128. (6) Operate quality assurance, cost and utilization management, medication therapy management, and support e-prescribing as required under subpart D of this part.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 28 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States ex rel. Spay v. CVS Caremark Corp. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2012, 913 F. Supp. 2d 125)“…bid submission data, and any other data specified by CMS. 42 C.F.R. § 423.505 (k)(l). If the claims data has been gen…”
- United States ex rel. Wood v. Allergan, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 2017, 246 F. Supp. 3d 772)“…id the antkickback statute (section 1128B(b) of the Act).” 42 C.F.R. § 423.505 (h)(1). Indeed, CMS regulations require…”
- Pharmaceutical Care Management v. Nizar Wehbi (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 2021, 18 F.4th 956)“…uch “terms and conditions” to be “reasonable and relevant,” 42 C.F.R. § 423.505(b)(18), recognizing that they must refl…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: North Carolina Medical Records Retention Laws (2026 Guide)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- A.R.S. § 12-2297 - Retention of Records(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 12-2293 - Release of Medical Records to Patients(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 12-2295 - Charges for Medical Records(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 32-3211 - Medical Records Protocol(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 12-2294 - Release of Medical Records to Third Parties(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 36-401 - Definitions (Healthcare Institutions)(azleg.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 12-542 - Statute of Limitations for Personal Injury(azleg.gov).gov
- HIPAA Privacy Rule Summary - HHS(hhs.gov).gov
- HIPAA Right of Access Guidance - HHS(hhs.gov).gov
- Disposal of Protected Health Information FAQ - HHS(hhs.gov).gov
- CMS Medical Record Maintenance and Access Requirements(cms.gov).gov
- 45 C.F.R. § 164.524 - Access of Individuals to PHI(govinfo.gov).gov
- A.R.S. § 32-1264 - Dental Records (Title 32, Chapter 11, Dentistry)(azleg.gov)
- 42 C.F.R. § 424.516(f) - Documentation for Ordered, Certified, Referred or Prescribed Part A/B Services(ecfr.gov)
- 42 C.F.R. § 423.505(d) - Part D Sponsor Maintenance of Records(ecfr.gov)