Washington
Washington Knife Laws (2026): Spring Blade, Intimidation Rule
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited September 24, 2026). · 11 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Washington bans manufacturing, selling, or possessing a spring-blade or gravity knife outright, and separately bans furtively concealing a dagger or dirk with intent to conceal it, but sets no statewide blade-length limit for an ordinary knife carried openly or without that intent (a knife with a blade longer than three inches is instead a listed deadly weapon for sentencing purposes, not a carry offense). A broader catch-all reaches any knife carried in a way that intimidates another person or creates public alarm, regardless of type, and open carry of a knife capable of and commonly used to cause death or bodily injury is separately banned at the state capitol campus, in a municipal building used for governing-body meetings, and at or near a permitted demonstration.
Jurisdiction scope: This page covers Washington state law only, principally RCW 9.41.250, 9.41.251, 9.41.270, 9.41.280, 9.41.282, 9.41.284, 9.41.290, 9.41.300, 9.41.305, 9.41.800, and 9.94A.825. It does not cover Washington's concealed pistol license statutes in detail, since those govern firearms rather than knives.
Can you own, open carry, or conceal carry a knife in Washington?
Ownership and carry of an ordinary knife, one that is not a spring blade or gravity knife and is not being furtively concealed with intent, is not restricted by RCW 9.41.250, Washington's core dangerous-weapons statute. That statute makes it a gross misdemeanor for a person who "(a) Manufactures, sells, or disposes of or possesses any instrument or weapon of the kind usually known as slungshot, sand club, or metal knuckles, or spring blade knife; (b) Furtively carries with intent to conceal any dagger, dirk, pistol, or other dangerous weapon." Subsection (2) defines "spring blade knife" broadly: "any knife, including a prototype, model, or other sample, with a blade that is automatically released by a spring mechanism or other mechanical device, or any knife having a blade which opens, or falls, or is ejected into position by the force of gravity, or by an outward, downward, or centrifugal thrust or movement." This single defined term covers both a traditional switchblade and a gravity knife, and its possession, manufacture, sale, or disposal is banned outright, not just its carrying.

The definition carries its own carve-out, mirroring the federal assisted-opening exemption: "A knife that contains a spring, detent, or other mechanism designed to create a bias toward closure of the blade and that requires physical exertion applied to the blade by hand, wrist, or arm to overcome the bias toward closure to assist in opening the knife is not a spring blade knife." A modern assisted-opening folding knife, which requires the user's own force on the blade to overcome a closure bias, falls outside the ban.
Separately, § (1)(b) reaches "furtively" carrying a dagger or dirk "with intent to conceal" it. This is a narrower offense than a blanket concealed-carry ban: the furtive-intent element means an ordinary dagger or dirk carried concealed without that intent does not violate this subsection. No blade-length threshold appears anywhere in RCW 9.41.250.
RCW 9.41.251 exempts the § 9.41.250 spring-blade-knife ban for a general authority law enforcement officer, firefighter or rescue member, Washington State Patrol officer, or military member while on official duty, or while transporting or storing the knife off duty, and for manufacture, sale, transport, or provisional evaluation of spring blade knives under contract with a qualifying agency, or with another knife manufacturer or commercial distributor.
Washington sets no blade-length threshold for carrying a knife under any of the statutes above. A three-inch line does exist elsewhere in Washington law, but it does not make carrying a knife unlawful: RCW 9.94A.825 lists "any knife having a blade longer than three inches" among the deadly weapons that trigger a deadly-weapon special verdict, a sentencing enhancement applied when a person is found to have been armed with a deadly weapon during commission of a separate crime. The same list applies to minimum-term calculations under RCW 9.95.040. Carrying a knife with a blade longer than three inches is not itself an offense; the length matters only if the knife is present during a different crime.
The broader "apparently capable of producing bodily harm" catch-all
Washington's carrying-weapons statute reaches further than § 9.41.250 for any knife, not just a spring blade or a furtively concealed dagger. RCW 9.41.270(1) provides: "It shall be unlawful for any person to carry, exhibit, display, or draw any firearm, dagger, sword, knife or other cutting or stabbing instrument, club, or any other weapon apparently capable of producing bodily harm, in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that either manifests an intent to intimidate another or that warrants alarm for the safety of other persons." A violation is a gross misdemeanor. Under the version in force as of this page's last update, a person convicted loses any concealed pistol license they hold; a 2025 amendment (2025 c 370 s 15), effective May 1, 2027, will additionally revoke any permit to purchase firearms the person already holds. Subsection (3) exempts a person in their own home or fixed place of business, a law enforcement officer performing official duties, a person acting in self-defense or defense of another against presently threatened unlawful force, a person making or assisting a lawful felony arrest, and a person engaged in government-sponsored military activities. This statute, unlike § 9.41.250, applies to any knife regardless of type, but only when the manner of carrying manifests intent to intimidate or warrants alarm; ordinary carry for a lawful purpose does not trigger it.
Open carry restrictions: the capitol, municipal meetings, and permitted demonstrations
Outside the intimidation-and-alarm catch-all above, Washington bans open carry of a knife outright in two specific settings, regardless of the manner of carrying. RCW 9.41.305(1) makes it unlawful to "knowingly open carry a firearm or other weapon, as defined in RCW 9.41.300(1)(b), while knowingly being in" the west state capitol campus grounds, the named buildings on the capitol grounds, a state legislative office, a state legislative hearing or meeting, or a city, town, county, or other municipality building used for a governing-body meeting, or any public meeting or hearing of such a governing body. A first violation is a misdemeanor; a second or subsequent violation is a gross misdemeanor. RCW 9.41.300(2)(a)-(b) separately bans knowingly open carrying a weapon at a permitted demonstration, or within 250 feet of one after a law enforcement officer has advised of the demonstration and directed the person to leave; a violation is a gross misdemeanor under § 9.41.300(16).

Both statutes borrow the same definition, cross-referenced from RCW 9.41.300(1)(b): "weapon" means "any firearm, explosive as defined in RCW 70.74.010, or any weapon of the kind usually known as slungshot, sand club, or metal knuckles, or any knife, dagger, dirk, or other similar weapon that is capable of causing death or bodily injury and is commonly used with the intent to cause death or bodily injury." An ordinary knife that meets that functional test, not only a spring blade or furtively concealed dagger, is covered. Both statutes exempt duly authorized law enforcement and military personnel acting in an official capacity, and both state that "[n]othing in this section applies to the lawful concealed carry of a firearm by a person who has a valid concealed pistol license," a carve-out written for firearms that does not reach a knife carried openly in these settings.
Schools, child care centers, and voting facilities
RCW 9.41.280(1) bans knowingly carrying onto or possessing on public or private elementary or secondary school premises, school transportation, areas used exclusively by the school, or areas of facilities while being used for official meetings of a school district board of directors: a firearm; "any other dangerous weapon as defined in RCW 9.41.250," meaning the § 9.41.250 list of a spring blade or gravity knife, slungshot, sand club, metal knuckles, or a furtively concealed dagger or dirk; nunchaku; throwing stars; an air gun; or a stun gun. A first violation is a misdemeanor, and a second or subsequent violation is a gross misdemeanor. Because the statute cross-references § 9.41.250 rather than banning "any knife" outright, an ordinary knife openly carried on school property, without a spring-blade mechanism or furtive concealment intent, is not named by this list. Subsection (2) makes any violation by an elementary or secondary school student "grounds for expulsion from the state's public schools in accordance with RCW 28A.600.010," and requires an appropriate school authority to promptly notify law enforcement and the student's parent or guardian.
A related statute, RCW 9.41.282, bans carrying onto or possessing on licensed child care center premises, its provided transportation, or areas a child care center uses exclusively: a firearm, an RCW 9.41.250 weapon (the same list as the school statute), an air gun, or a stun gun. Unlike the school statute, § 9.41.282(1) has no "knowingly" element on its face. A first violation is a gross misdemeanor, harsher than a first school violation, and a conviction involving a firearm costs the person their concealed pistol license for three years and bars a new application for three years. Exceptions cover a licensed pistol carrier picking up or dropping off a child, and a person 18 or older with the item secured in an attended vehicle or locked out of view in an unattended one while conducting business at the center.
RCW 9.41.284 imposes a structure similar to the school statute at a ballot counting center, voting center, student engagement hub, or county elections and voter registration office: a firearm, an RCW 9.41.250 weapon, an air gun, or a stun gun may not knowingly be carried onto or possessed at these locations, subject to exceptions in subsections (3) and (4).
Courthouses, jails, bars, libraries, zoos, transit facilities, and secure airport areas
RCW 9.41.300(1) bans knowingly possessing or controlling a weapon while entering eight categories of places: (a) the restricted access areas of a jail, law enforcement facility, or confinement facility; (b) areas of a building used in connection with court proceedings, including courtrooms, jury rooms, judges' chambers, and adjacent corridors; (c) the restricted access areas of a public mental health facility licensed for inpatient hospital care, or a state institution for the care of the mentally ill; (d) a portion of an establishment classified as off-limits to persons under 21; (e) the restricted access area of a commercial-service airport covered by an approved federal security plan; (f) the premises of a public library; (g) the premises of an accredited zoo or aquarium; and (h) the premises of a transit station or transit facility. Categories (f), (g), and (h) were added by 2024 c 285 s 1.

The statute's governing definition of "weapon" depends on which category applies. For category (b), the court-proceeding-area restriction, the statute defines "weapon" broadly on its own terms: "any firearm, explosive as defined in RCW 70.74.010, or any weapon of the kind usually known as slungshot, sand club, or metal knuckles, or any knife, dagger, dirk, or other similar weapon that is capable of causing death or bodily injury and is commonly used with the intent to cause death or bodily injury." Whether an ordinary utility knife meets that two-part test, capable of causing death or bodily injury and commonly used with that intent, is a question of fact rather than a bright-line rule. For every other category, including (a) and (c) through (h), subsection (17) supplies a narrower definition: "'Weapon' as used in this section means any firearm, explosive as defined in RCW 70.74.010, or instrument or weapon listed in RCW 9.41.250," the spring-blade or gravity-knife and furtive-concealment list, not an ordinary knife by name. A violation of subsection (1) is a gross misdemeanor. The local legislative authority responsible for a restricted court area must provide a locked storage box or a designated official to receive a weapon owner's weapon during a visit.
No statewide preemption reaching knives
Washington's preemption statute, RCW 9.41.290, is scoped to firearms. It provides: "The state of Washington hereby fully occupies and preempts the entire field of firearms regulation within the boundaries of the state, including the registration, licensing, possession, purchase, sale, acquisition, transfer, discharge, and transportation of firearms, or any other element relating to firearms or parts thereof, including ammunition and reloader components." A city, town, or county may enact only firearms-related ordinances specifically authorized by state law, such as those permitted under RCW 9.41.300. Read directly, the statute's text does not mention knives at all, so a Washington local government is not preempted by RCW 9.41.290 from adopting its own knife-specific ordinance.
Protection orders can require surrendering a knife
Washington's protection-order surrender statute, RCW 9.41.800, reaches knives by its own words, not only firearms. When a court enters an order under the domestic-violence, harassment, sexual-assault, stalking, extreme-risk, or antiharassment protection chapters listed in subsection (1), and finds that the restrained party "[u]sed, displayed, or threatened to use a firearm or other dangerous weapon in a felony, or is ineligible to possess a firearm under the provisions of RCW 9.41.040," the court must "(a) Require that the party immediately surrender all firearms and other dangerous weapons" and "(c) Prohibit the party from accessing, having custody or control, possessing, purchasing, receiving, or attempting to purchase or receive, any firearms or other dangerous weapons." A knife that is capable of causing death or bodily injury falls within that surrender-and-possession bar for a person subject to a qualifying order, making this the one Washington statute that can bar a specific named person from possessing a knife at all.
Federal law: what it does and does not reach
Federal law does not ban an individual from owning or carrying a switchblade. The Federal Switchblade Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1241 to 1245, restricts interstate commerce in switchblade knives and, in 15 U.S.C. § 1245, makes it a federal offense to knowingly possess, manufacture, sell, or import a ballistic knife in or affecting interstate commerce or within federal territorial jurisdiction; the operative offense sections, §§ 1242 and 1243, do not apply to certain knives and people, listed as exemptions in 15 U.S.C. § 1244. A 2009 amendment, § 1244(5), exempts a knife with a spring, detent, or other closure-bias mechanism that requires hand, wrist, or arm exertion on the blade itself to overcome the bias and assist opening, the carve-out that keeps modern assisted-opening folding knives legal in interstate commerce. Washington's own spring-blade-knife definition, above, tracks this same language almost word for word. A separate federal exemption, § 1244(4), covers a person with only one arm possessing or carrying a switchblade with a blade three inches or less.
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information about Washington knife law as of September 2026. It is not legal advice. Consult a lawyer licensed in Washington for advice about a specific situation.
For a state-by-state comparison, see knife laws by state. Washington's self-defense statutes are covered separately on the Washington self-defense laws page.
Statutes cited reflect their in-force version as of 2026-09-18. Last updated: 2026-09-18.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to carry a switchblade in Washington?
No. RCW 9.41.250(1)(a) makes manufacturing, selling, or possessing a 'spring blade knife,' the statute's term for a switchblade or gravity knife, a gross misdemeanor. A knife with a closure-bias spring that requires the user's own hand, wrist, or arm exertion to assist opening is exempted from that definition.
Does Washington have a blade-length limit for knives?
No statute sets a blade-length threshold for carrying a knife; RCW 9.41.250 defines its banned category by opening mechanism, not length. A three-inch line does exist elsewhere: RCW 9.94A.825 lists a knife with a blade longer than three inches as a deadly weapon for the sentencing-enhancement special verdict, which applies only if the knife was present during a separate crime, not to carrying it on its own.
Can you carry a knife openly in Washington?
Generally yes, for an ordinary knife that is not a spring blade or gravity knife, as long as the manner of carrying does not manifest intent to intimidate or create alarm under RCW 9.41.270. Furtively concealing a dagger or dirk with intent to conceal it is separately unlawful under RCW 9.41.250(1)(b). Open carry of a knife capable of and commonly used to cause death or bodily injury is banned outright, regardless of manner, on the state capitol campus and in a municipal building used for governing-body meetings under RCW 9.41.305 (a place-based ban that does not switch off between meetings), and at or within 250 feet of a permitted demonstration under RCW 9.41.300(2).
Can you carry a knife into a Washington courthouse, library, or child care center?
A knife that is capable of and commonly used to cause death or bodily injury cannot go into a court-proceeding area under RCW 9.41.300(1)(b). An ordinary knife outside that functional test is not barred from the other RCW 9.41.300(1) locations (jail restricted areas, mental health facility restricted areas, the 21-and-over part of a liquor establishment, secure airport areas, libraries, zoos and aquariums, and transit facilities), because those categories use the narrower RCW 9.41.250 weapon list. A licensed child care center is governed separately by RCW 9.41.282, which bans any RCW 9.41.250 weapon there; an ordinary knife without a spring-blade mechanism or furtive concealment intent is not on that list either.
Does Washington preempt local knife ordinances?
No. Washington's statewide preemption statute, RCW 9.41.290, is scoped to firearms and does not mention knives, so a Washington city, town, or county may adopt its own knife-specific ordinance.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Revised Code of Washington
§ 9.41.250Dangerous weapons—Penalty.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) Every person who: (a) Manufactures, sells, or disposes of or possesses any instrument or weapon of the kind usually known as slungshot, sand club, or metal knuckles, or spring blade knife; (b) Furtively carries with intent to conceal any dagger, dirk, pistol, or other dangerous weapon; or (c) Uses any contrivance or device for suppressing the noise of any firearm unless the suppressor is legally registered and possessed in accordance with federal law, is guilty of a gross misdemeanor punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW. (2) "Spring blade knife" means any knife, including a prototype, model, or other sample, with a blade that is automatically released by a spring mechanism or other mechanical device, or any knife having a blade which opens, or falls, or is ejected into position by the force of gravity, or by an outward, downward, or centrifugal thrust or movement. A knife that contains a spring, detent, or other mechanism designed to create a bias toward closure of the blade and that requires physical exertion applied to the blade by hand, wrist, or arm to overcome the bias toward closure to assist in opening the knife is not a spring blade knife.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 24 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Echeverria (Court of Appeals of Washington 1997, 85 Wash. App. 777)“…count two, possession of a dangerous weapon in violation of RCW 9.41.250, in that he, "with intent to conceal su…”
- State v. Myles (Washington Supreme Court 1995, 127 Wash. 2d 807)“…f unlawful possession of a dangerous weapon in violation of RCW 9.41.250. At issue is the constitutionality of t…”
- State v. Wadsworth (Washington Supreme Court 2000, 139 Wash. 2d 724)“…ovided Respondent an opportunity to review RCW 9.41.300 and RCW 9.41.250. 25 After reviewing the statutes, Resp…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Knife Laws by State (2026): Carry Rules, Blade Limits, Penalties, Washington Pepper Spray and Stun Gun Laws (2026)
§ 9.41.270Weapons apparently capable of producing bodily harm—Unlawful carrying or handling—Penalty—Exceptions. (Effective until May 1, 2027.)In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to carry, exhibit, display, or draw any firearm, dagger, sword, knife or other cutting or stabbing instrument, club, or any other weapon apparently capable of producing bodily harm, in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that either manifests an intent to intimidate another or that warrants alarm for the safety of other persons. (2) Any person violating the provisions of subsection (1) above shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor. If any person is convicted of a violation of subsection (1) of this section, the person shall lose his or her concealed pistol license, if any. The court shall send notice of the revocation to the department of licensing, and the city, town, or county which issued the license.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 75 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Workman (Washington Supreme Court 1978, 90 Wash. 2d 443)“…uction on the offense of unlawfully carrying a weapon under RCW 9.41.270 should have been given. Failure to give…”
- State v. MacIolek (Washington Supreme Court 1984, 101 Wash. 2d 259)“…resents a single issue, whether a statute and an ordinance, RCW 9.41.270 and Seattle city ordinance 110179, codi…”
- City of Seattle v. Montana (Washington Supreme Court 1996, 129 Wash. 2d 583)“…5.22.280(35). As the Court of Appeals noted with respect to RCW 9.41.270, which makes it unlawful for a person t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9.41.300Weapons prohibited in certain places—Local laws and ordinances—Exceptions—Penalty.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) It is unlawful for any person to enter the following places when he or she knowingly possesses or knowingly has under his or her control a weapon: (a) The restricted access areas of a jail, or of a law enforcement facility, or any place used for the confinement of a person (i) arrested for, charged with, or convicted of an offense, (ii) held for extradition or as a material witness, or (iii) otherwise confined pursuant to an order of a court, except an order under chapter 13.32A or 13.34 RCW. Restricted access areas do not include common areas of egress or ingress open to the general public; (b) Those areas in any building which are used in connection with court proceedings, including courtrooms, jury rooms, judge's chambers, offices and areas used to conduct court business, waiting areas, and corridors adjacent to areas used in connection with court proceedings. The restricted areas do not include common areas of ingress and egress to the building that is used in connection with court proceedings, when it is possible to protect court areas without restricting ingress and egress to the building.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Pacific Northwest Shooting Park Ass'n v. City of Sequim (Washington Supreme Court 2006, 158 Wash. 2d 342)“…0, failed because there is no private cause of action under RCW 9.41.300 and neither statute was violated. In it…”
- State v. Anderson (Washington Supreme Court 2000, 141 Wash. 2d 357)“…n of the fact that in a similar weapons possession statute, RCW 9.41.300, the Legislature explicitly included a…”
- State v. Wadsworth (Washington Supreme Court 2000, 139 Wash. 2d 724)“…th court proceedings in which weapons are prohibited. See RCW 9.41.300(l)(b). The problematic aspects of the s…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9.41.305Open carry of weapons prohibited on state capitol grounds and municipal buildings.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Unless exempt under subsection (3) of this section, it is unlawful for any person to knowingly open carry a firearm or other weapon, as defined in RCW 9.41.300(1)(b), while knowingly being in the following locations: (a) The west state capitol campus grounds; any buildings on the state capitol grounds; any state legislative office; or any location of a public state legislative hearing or meeting during the hearing or meeting; or (b) City, town, county, or other municipality buildings used in connection with meetings of the governing body of the city, town, county, or other municipality, or any location of a public meeting or hearing of the governing body of a city, town, county, or other municipality during the hearing or meeting. (2) For the purposes of this section: (a) "Buildings on the state capitol grounds" means the following buildings located on the state capitol grounds, commonly known as Legislative, Temple of Justice, John L. O'Brien, John A. Cherberg, Irving R. Newhouse, Joel M. Pritchard, Helen Sommers, Insurance, Governor's Mansion, Visitor Information Center, Carlyon House, Ayer House, General Administration, 1500 Jefferson, James M.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
§ 9.41.280Possessing dangerous weapons on school facilities—Penalty—Exceptions.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) It is unlawful for a person to knowingly carry onto, or to possess on, public or private elementary or secondary school premises, school-provided transportation, areas of facilities while being used exclusively by public or private schools, or areas of facilities while being used for official meetings of a school district board of directors: (a) Any firearm; (b) Any other dangerous weapon as defined in RCW 9.41.250; (c) Any device commonly known as "nun-chu-ka [nunchaku] sticks," consisting of two or more lengths of wood, metal, plastic, or similar substance connected with wire, rope, or other means; (d) Any device, commonly known as "throwing stars," which are multipointed, metal objects designed to embed upon impact from any aspect; (e) Any air gun, including any air pistol or air rifle, designed to propel a BB, pellet, or other projectile by the discharge of compressed air, carbon dioxide, or other gas; or (f)(i) Any portable device manufactured to function as a weapon and which is commonly known as a stun gun, including a projectile stun gun which projects wired probes that are attached to the device that emit an electrical charge designed to administer to a person…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. C.Q. (Court of Appeals of Washington 1999, 96 Wash. App. 273)“…d by the Legislature. The definitional statute in question, RCW 9.41.280, lists a variety of weapons of a kind c…”
- State v. J.R. (Court of Appeals of Washington 2005, 127 Wash. App. 293)“…scalloped-edge blade is a dangerous weapon for purposes of RCW 9.41.280, the criminal statute that prohibits po…”
- State v. JR (Court of Appeals of Washington 2005, 111 P.3d 264)“…scalloped-edge blade is a dangerous weapon for purposes of RCW 9.41.280, the criminal statute that prohibits po…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9.41.282Possessing dangerous weapons on child care premises—Penalty—Exceptions.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) It is unlawful for a person to carry onto, or to possess on, licensed child care center premises, child care center-provided transportation, or areas of facilities while being used exclusively by a child care center: (a) Any firearm; (b) Any other dangerous weapon as described in RCW 9.41.250; (c) Any air gun, including any air pistol or air rifle, designed to propel a BB, pellet, or other projectile by the discharge of compressed air, carbon dioxide, or other gas; or (d)(i) Any portable device manufactured to function as a weapon and which is commonly known as a stun gun, including a projectile stun gun that projects wired probes that are attached to the device that emit an electrical charge designed to administer to a person or an animal an electric shock, charge, or impulse; or (ii) Any device, object, or instrument that is used or intended to be used as a weapon with the intent to injure a person by an electric shock, charge, or impulse. (2) A person who violates subsection (1) of this section is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
§ 9.41.284Possessing dangerous weapons at voting facilities—Penalty—Exceptions.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Except as provided in subsections (3) and (4) of this section, it is unlawful for a person to knowingly carry onto, or to possess in, a ballot counting center, a voting center, a student engagement hub, or the county elections and voter registration office, or areas of facilities while being used as a ballot counting center, a voting center, a student engagement hub, or the county elections and voter registration office: (a) Any firearm; (b) Any other dangerous weapon as described in RCW 9.41.250; (c) Any air gun, including any air pistol or air rifle, designed to propel a BB, pellet, or other projectile by the discharge of compressed air, carbon dioxide, or other gas; (d)(i) Any portable device manufactured to function as a weapon and which is commonly known as a stun gun, including a projectile stun gun that projects wired probes that are attached to the device that emit an electrical charge designed to administer to a person or an animal an electric shock, charge, or impulse; or (ii) Any device, object, or instrument that is used or intended to be used as a weapon with the intent to injure a person by an electric shock, charge, or impulse; or (e) Any spring blade…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
§ 9.41.251Dangerous weapons—Application of restrictions to law enforcement, firefighting, rescue, and military personnel.In force
(1) RCW 9.41.250 does not apply to: (a) The possession or use of a spring blade knife by a general authority law enforcement officer, firefighter or rescue member, Washington state patrol officer, or military member, while the officer or member: (i) Is on official duty; or (ii) Is transporting a spring blade knife to or from the place where the knife is stored when the officer or member is not on official duty; or (iii) Is storing a spring blade knife; (b) The manufacture, sale, transportation, transfer, distribution, or possession of spring blade knives pursuant to contract with a general authority law enforcement agency, fire or rescue agency, Washington state patrol, or military service, or pursuant to a contract with another manufacturer or a commercial distributor of knives for use, sale, or other disposition by the manufacturer or commercial distributor; (c) The manufacture, transportation, transfer, distribution, or possession of spring blade knives, with or without compensation and with or without a contract, solely for trial, test, or other provisional use for evaluation and assessment purposes, by a general authority law enforcement agency, fire or rescue agency,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
§ 9.41.290State preemption.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
The state of Washington hereby fully occupies and preempts the entire field of firearms regulation within the boundaries of the state, including the registration, licensing, possession, purchase, sale, acquisition, transfer, discharge, and transportation of firearms, or any other element relating to firearms or parts thereof, including ammunition and reloader components. Cities, towns, and counties or other municipalities may enact only those laws and ordinances relating to firearms that are specifically authorized by state law, as in RCW 9.41.300, and are consistent with this chapter. Such local ordinances shall have the same penalty as provided for by state law. Local laws and ordinances that are inconsistent with, more restrictive than, or exceed the requirements of state law shall not be enacted and are preempted and repealed, regardless of the nature of the code, charter, or home rule status of such city, town, county, or municipality.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 17 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Pacific Northwest Shooting Park Ass'n v. City of Sequim (Washington Supreme Court 2006, 158 Wash. 2d 342)“…gun show. It also claimed that the city’s actions violated RCW 9.41.290 and .300. PNSPA later argued that the c…”
- Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (Washington Supreme Court 1991, 116 Wash. 2d 794)“…796 policy. The Court of Appeals held that RCW 9.41.290 preempted ¿nd invalidated Metro's regul…”
- City of Seattle v. Ballsmider (Court of Appeals of Washington 1993, 71 Wash. App. 159)“…allowed under RCW 9.41.230 (90 days and $1,000). In RCW 9.41.290, the Legislature declared its intent to…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9.41.800Surrender of weapons or licenses—Prohibition on future possession or licensing.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) Any court when entering an order authorized under chapter 7.105 RCW, RCW 9A.40.102, 9A.44.210, 9A.46.080, 9A.88.160, 10.99.040, 10.99.045, 26.09.050, 26.09.060, 26.26B.020, 26.26A.470, or 46.61.5055 shall, upon a showing by a preponderance of the evidence, that a party has: Used, displayed, or threatened to use a firearm or other dangerous weapon in a felony, or is ineligible to possess a firearm under the provisions of RCW 9.41.040: (a) Require that the party immediately surrender all firearms and other dangerous weapons; (b) Require that the party immediately surrender any concealed pistol license issued under RCW 9.41.070; (c) Prohibit the party from accessing, having custody or control, possessing, purchasing, receiving, or attempting to purchase or receive, any firearms or other dangerous weapons; (d) Prohibit the party from obtaining or possessing a concealed pistol license; (e) Other than for ex parte temporary protection orders, unless the ex parte temporary protection order was reissued after the party received noticed and had an opportunity to be heard, direct law enforcement to revoke any concealed pistol license issued to the party.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 34 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Alexandra Braatz v. Michael Braatz (Court of Appeals of Washington 2018, 413 P.3d 612)“…rson to surrender all firearms and other dangerous weapons. RCW 9.41.800(3). We are asked to determine the burde…”
- Jennifer Jo Dare Medlin v. Andrew Allen Miller (Court of Appeals of Washington 2026)“…firearms, dangerous weapons, and concealed pistol licenses. RCW 9.41.800(1)(a), (b), (2)(c)(ii)(A), (B). The ord…”
- State Of Washington, V. Caleb Dane Bell (Court of Appeals of Washington 2026)“…ith No. 87502-7-I)/4 (II) Includes an order under RCW 9.41.800 requiring the person to surrend…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Washington Restraining Order Laws (2026): How to Get a Protection Order
§ 9.94A.825Deadly weapon special verdict—Definition.In force
In a criminal case wherein there has been a special allegation and evidence establishing that the accused or an accomplice was armed with a deadly weapon at the time of the commission of the crime, the court shall make a finding of fact of whether or not the accused or an accomplice was armed with a deadly weapon at the time of the commission of the crime, or if a jury trial is had, the jury shall, if it find[s] the defendant guilty, also find a special verdict as to whether or not the defendant or an accomplice was armed with a deadly weapon at the time of the commission of the crime. For purposes of this section, a deadly weapon is an implement or instrument which has the capacity to inflict death and from the manner in which it is used, is likely to produce or may easily and readily produce death.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 95 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State Of Washington v. Kevin Lee Estes (Court of Appeals of Washington 2016, 193 Wash. App. 479)“…ses “[a]ny other felony with a deadly weapon verdict under RCW 9.94A.825.” Former RCW 9.94…”
- State v. Johnson (Court of Appeals of Washington 2015, 185 Wash. App. 655)“…DEADLY WEAPON-FIREARMZDOMESTIC VIOLENCE, RCW 9A.52.020(1), RCW 9.94A.825, RCW 9.94A.533(3) AND RCW 10.99.020 - C…”
- State v. Estes (Washington Supreme Court 2017)“…ikely to produce or may easily and readily produce death." RCW 9.94A.825. Any knife with a blade longer than thr…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 70.74.010Definitions.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
As used in this chapter, unless a different meaning is plainly required by the context: (1) The terms "authorized," "approved," or "approval" shall be held to mean authorized, approved, or approval by the department of labor and industries. (2) The term "blasting agent" shall be held to mean and include any material or mixture consisting of a fuel and oxidizer, that is intended for blasting and not otherwise defined as an explosive; if the finished product, as mixed for use or shipment, cannot be detonated by means of a number 8 test blasting cap when unconfined. A number 8 test blasting cap is one containing two grams of a mixture of eighty percent mercury fulminate and twenty percent potassium chlorate, or a blasting cap of equivalent strength. An equivalent strength cap comprises 0.40-0.45 grams of PETN base charge pressed in an aluminum shell with bottom thickness not to exceed 0.03 of an inch, to a specific gravity of not less than 1.4 g/cc., and primed with standard weights of primer depending on the manufacturer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re Yim (Washington Supreme Court 1999, 139 Wash. 2d 581)“…referred to as fireworks. purpose of manufacture. Former RCW 70.74.010. This provision obviously defines "fire…”
- State v. Wiggins (Court of Appeals of Washington 2002, 114 Wash. App. 478)“…ch is designed to disfigure, destroy, distract, or harass.” RCW 70.74.010(7). The term “components” in RCW 70.7…”
- State v. Yokley (Court of Appeals of Washington 1998, 91 Wash. App. 773)“…fects on contiguous objects or of destroying life or limb.” RCW 70.74.010(3). 14 Hence, without a “f…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9.41.040Unlawful possession of firearms—Penalties.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1)(a) A person, whether an adult or juvenile, is guilty of the crime of unlawful possession of a firearm in the first degree: (i) If the person owns, accesses, has in the person's custody, control, or possession, or receives any firearm after having previously been convicted or found not guilty by reason of insanity in this state or elsewhere of any serious offense; or (ii) If the person owns, accesses, has in the person's custody, control, or possession, or receives any untraceable or undetectable firearm during any period of time that the person is subject to an order described in subsection (2)(a)(ii) of this section. (b) Unlawful possession of a firearm in the first degree is a class B felony punishable according to chapter 9A.20 RCW.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 535 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Gore (Washington Supreme Court 1984, 101 Wash. 2d 481)“…some people in a parking lot. He was charged with violating RCW 9.41.040, which prohibits one who has been "conv…”
- Davis v. Department of Licensing (Washington Supreme Court 1999, 137 Wash. 2d 957)“…hen the department receives notice from a court pursuant to RCW 9.41.040(5), 13.40.265, 66.44.365, 69.41.065, 69…”
- Morris v. Blaker (Washington Supreme Court 1992, 118 Wash. 2d 133)“…320 of the involuntary commitment act. RCW 9.41.070(1)(a); RCW 9.41.040(4). Mr. Morris brought an action…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 9.95.040Terms fixed by board—Minimums for certain cases.In force
The board shall fix the duration of confinement for persons committed by the court before July 1, 1986, for crimes committed before July 1, 1984. Within six months after the admission of the convicted person to a state correctional facility, the board shall fix the duration of confinement. The term of imprisonment so fixed shall not exceed the maximum provided by law for the offense of which the person was convicted or the maximum fixed by the court where the law does not provide for a maximum term. Subject to RCW 9.95.047, the following limitations are placed on the board or the court for persons committed to a state correctional facility on or after July 1, 1986, for crimes committed before July 1, 1984, with regard to fixing the duration of confinement in certain cases, notwithstanding any provisions of law specifying a lesser sentence: (1) For a person not previously convicted of a felony but armed with a deadly weapon at the time of the commission of the offense, the duration of confinement shall not be fixed at less than five years.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 233 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Workman (Washington Supreme Court 1978, 90 Wash. 2d 443)“…bery while armed with a deadly weapon within the meaning of RCW 9.95.040, which was also a firearm within the me…”
- State v. Theroff (Washington Supreme Court 1980, 95 Wash. 2d 385)“…sequent offenses; and, or (b) Armed with a deadly weapon (RCW 9.95.040). Subsequently, the information was a…”
- State v. Fain (Washington Supreme Court 1980, 94 Wash. 2d 387)“…imum sentence at less than 15 years and may fix it at life. RCW 9.95.040(3). The prisoner is entitled to earn cr…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 15
§ 1241DefinitionsIn forcecited in 52 of our articles
As used in this chapter— The term “interstate commerce” means commerce between any State, Territory, possession of the United States, or the District of Columbia, and any place outside thereof. The term “switchblade knife” means any knife having a blade which opens automatically— by hand pressure applied to a button or other device in the handle of the knife, or by operation of inertia, gravity, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 15 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Stewart A. Taylor, D/B/A Taylor Cutlery Mfg. Co. v. United States of America (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 1988, 848 F.2d 715)“…Service, are not switchblade knives within the meaning of 15 U.S.C. § 1241 (b) and 19 C.F.R. § 1295 (a)(1). The d…”
- Crowley Cutlery Company v. United States of America and Commissioner of Customs of the United States Customs Service (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 1988, 849 F.2d 273)“…Illinois for a declaration that the Switchblade Knife Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1241 et seq., which forbids th…”
- Edna Fall, as Administratrix of the Estate of Phillip Fall, Deceased v. Esso Standard Oil Company (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1962, 297 F.2d 411)“…25 S.Ct. 158 , 49 L.Ed. 363 . Section 1 of the Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1241 (b), defines the term “switchblade knif…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama Knife Laws (2026): What Is Legal to Carry, Alaska Knife Laws (2026): Concealed Carry Rules Explained, Arizona Knife Laws (2026): Carry Rules and Preemption
§ 1244ExceptionsIn forcecited in 52 of our articles
Sections 1242 and 1243 of this title shall not apply to— any common carrier or contract carrier, with respect to any switchblade knife shipped, transported, or delivered for shipment in interstate commerce in the ordinary course of business; the manufacture, sale, transportation, distribution, possession, or introduction into interstate commerce, of switchblade knives pursuant to contract with the Armed Forces; the Armed Forces or any member or employee thereof acting in the performance of his duty; the possession, and transportation upon his person, of any switchblade knife with a blade three inches or less in length by any individual who has only one arm; or a knife that contains a spring, detent, or other mechanism designed to create a bias toward closure of the blade and that requires exertion applied to the blade by hand, wrist, or arm to overcome the bias toward closure to assist in opening the knife.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Also relied on in: Arkansas Knife Laws (2026): Intent-Based Carry Rules, California Knife Laws (2026): Four Blade-Length Rules, Colorado Knife Laws (2026): Concealed Carry and Exceptions
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- RCW 9.41.250 - Dangerous weapons - Penalty(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 9.41.251 - Dangerous weapons - Application of restrictions to law enforcement, firefighting, rescue, and military personnel(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 9.41.270 - Weapons apparently capable of producing bodily harm - Unlawful carrying or handling(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 9.41.280 - Possessing dangerous weapons on school facilities(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 9.41.282 - Possessing dangerous weapons on child care premises(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 9.41.284 - Possessing dangerous weapons at voting facilities(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 9.41.290 - State preemption(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 9.41.300 - Weapons prohibited in certain places(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 9.41.305 - Open carry of weapons prohibited on state capitol grounds and municipal buildings(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 9.94A.825 - Deadly weapon special verdict - Definition(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 9.41.800 - Surrender of firearms and dangerous weapons - Order - Grounds(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- 15 U.S.C. §§ 1241-1245 - Federal Switchblade Act, interstate commerce and ballistic-knife scope(law.cornell.edu)
- 15 U.S.C. § 1244 - exceptions, including the 2009 assisted-opening carve-out and the one-arm exception(law.cornell.edu)