South Dakota
Bankruptcy in South Dakota (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Bankruptcy runs on federal law, but South Dakota sets the exemptions that decide what property you keep. South Dakota has opted out of the federal bankruptcy exemptions, so residents must use the state's own exemptions in Title 43 of the South Dakota Codified Laws. South Dakota is notable for a homestead exemption that carries no general dollar cap and is limited chiefly by acreage, although SDCL 43-45-3 sets a $170,000 limit for the homestead of a person seventy or older. This guide covers that homestead, the personal-property exemptions, the Chapter 7 means test for South Dakota, and where cases are filed. All figures are dated; confirm current amounts before relying on them.
Does South Dakota Use State or Federal Bankruptcy Exemptions?
South Dakota has opted out of the federal bankruptcy exemptions. Under SDCL 43-31-30 and 43-45-13, residents may not claim the federal exemptions in 11 U.S.C. 522(d) and must instead use South Dakota's state exemptions. Some federal nonbankruptcy protections can still apply, but the core property exemptions come from South Dakota law, and that includes retirement money: the $1,000,000 employee-benefit-plan exemption in SDCL 43-45-16 is a state exemption, not a federal one.
Which state's exemptions you use is set by the residency rules in 11 U.S.C. 522(b)(3). If you have not lived in South Dakota long enough before filing (generally the prior 730 days, with a look-back for the period before that), a different state's exemptions may govern.
South Dakota Homestead Exemption
South Dakota offers one of the most generous homestead exemptions in the country. Under SDCL 43-45-3, a homestead as defined and limited in chapter 43-31 is absolutely exempt, and the statute sets no general dollar cap on its value. The main limit is geographic: SDCL 43-31-4 restricts the homestead to one acre if it sits within a recorded town or city plat, or to 160 acres if it is rural land. A qualifying mobile home can also be a homestead under SDCL 43-31-2.
Two dollar figures inside SDCL 43-45-3 qualify that picture. First, the statute provides that "the exemption is limited to one hundred seventy thousand dollars for a homestead of a person seventy years of age or older or the unremarried surviving spouse of such person so long as it continues to possess the character of a homestead." That sentence sits in the subdivision of 43-45-3 that also covers sale proceeds and court-divided homesteads, so an owner who is seventy or older and is counting on more than $170,000 of protected equity should have a South Dakota bankruptcy attorney confirm how it applies before filing. Second, if the homestead is sold voluntarily or under chapter 21-19, the sale proceeds are absolutely exempt only up to $100,000, and only for one year after the owner receives them. A filer who sold a home shortly before filing is covered by that narrower proceeds rule, not by the homestead exemption itself.
A separate provision uses the same figure for a different purpose. SDCL 43-31-1 exempts a homestead worth less than $170,000 belonging to a person seventy or older, and that person's unremarried surviving spouse, from sale for taxes. That is a property-tax rule, not the bankruptcy exemption limit in 43-45-3.

Because there is no general dollar cap, a South Dakota filer under seventy can in principle protect substantial home equity, subject to the acreage limits. If you own more than one residence, you may select only one as your homestead.
A federal limit also applies on top of the state exemption. Under 11 U.S.C. 522(p), a debtor generally cannot exempt more than $214,000 (the amount in effect for cases filed on or after April 1, 2025, and adjusted again April 1, 2028) of homestead equity acquired during the 1,215 days, roughly 40 months, before filing. Equity that has been in the home longer than that window is not subject to the cap. This federal ceiling is the practical limit on recently acquired equity in a South Dakota homestead.
Motor Vehicle, Personal Property, and Wildcard Exemptions
South Dakota does not provide a stand-alone, dollar-capped motor-vehicle exemption the way many states do. Instead, vehicles and most other personal property are protected through a two-tier system.
First, SDCL 43-45-2 lists certain property that is absolutely exempt, such as family pictures, a burial plot, church pew, certain clothing, and food and fuel for the family. Second, SDCL 43-45-4 provides an exemption that is expressly "in addition to the property provided for in" SDCL 43-45-2 and 43-45-3, from which the filer chooses other personal property, including a vehicle, up to an aggregate value of $7,000 if the debtor is the head of a family or $5,000 if the debtor is not. A filer does not trade away the homestead to claim it. This selectable allowance functions much like a wildcard for personal property.
South Dakota also protects retirement savings by statute. Under SDCL 43-45-16, a person may select and designate a total of $1,000,000 from employee benefit plans, together with the income and distributions from them, as exempt from execution, attachment, garnishment, seizure, or other legal process. That exemption is subject to the right of the state and its political subdivisions to collect amounts owed to them, and to a qualified domestic relations order.
Wages are also protected. South Dakota limits wage garnishment, and federal law under 15 U.S.C. 1673 separately caps the portion of disposable earnings a creditor can reach. Confirm the current figures, since the personal-property allowance and garnishment limits can change.
The South Dakota Means Test
The Chapter 7 means test compares your household income to the median family income for your household size in South Dakota. Income at or below the median means you presumptively qualify for Chapter 7. Income above the median moves you to a fuller disposable-income calculation on Bankruptcy Form 122A-2, which determines whether the filing is presumed abusive.
The U.S. Trustee Program publishes and periodically updates the medians. For cases filed on or after April 1, 2026, the South Dakota median family income is:
- 1 earner: $69,190
- 2 people: $89,809
- 3 people: $100,883
- 4 people: $130,738
Add $11,100 for each individual beyond four. The U.S. Trustee revises these figures about twice a year, so check the table for your filing date.
Chapter 7 vs. Chapter 13 and the Automatic Stay
Chapter 7 is a liquidation. A trustee may sell nonexempt property to pay creditors, and most remaining unsecured debt is discharged, generally within a few months. Given South Dakota's broad homestead protection and personal-property allowances, many filers keep all of their property in a no-asset case.

Chapter 13 is a reorganization. You keep your property and repay part or all of what you owe through a court-approved plan lasting three to five years. It fits filers who are behind on a mortgage or vehicle loan and want to cure the arrears, or whose income is too high to pass the Chapter 7 means test.
Filing either chapter triggers the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. 362, which immediately stops most collection activity, foreclosure, repossession, lawsuits, and wage garnishment while the case is open.
Where You File in South Dakota
South Dakota bankruptcy cases are filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Dakota, a single statewide district. The court holds hearings at several locations, including Sioux Falls, Pierre, Aberdeen, and Rapid City. The court's website provides the local rules, forms, and filing details.
What Bankruptcy Can and Cannot Do
Bankruptcy discharges most unsecured debts, including credit cards, medical bills, and personal loans. It generally does not discharge most student loans, recent income taxes, child support, alimony, or debts arising from fraud. You must complete a credit-counseling course from an approved provider before filing and a debtor-education course before discharge.

Exemption rules, median income figures, and the federal homestead cap each change on their own schedules. This page is general information, not legal advice. Because the right chapter and the property you can protect turn on your specific situation, consider consulting a licensed South Dakota bankruptcy attorney and confirming every figure against the current statute and U.S. Trustee data.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does South Dakota use state or federal bankruptcy exemptions?
South Dakota has opted out of the federal exemptions under SDCL 43-31-30 and 43-45-13, so filers must use the South Dakota state exemptions in Title 43 and cannot choose the federal set. Some federal nonbankruptcy protections can still apply, and retirement money also has a state exemption: SDCL 43-45-16 allows a total of $1,000,000 from employee benefit plans to be designated as exempt.
What is the homestead exemption in South Dakota?
The homestead is absolutely exempt under SDCL 43-45-3 and carries no general dollar cap. It is limited by area instead: up to 1 acre within a town or city plat, or up to 160 acres of rural land (SDCL 43-31-4). Two limits sit inside the statute: the exemption is limited to $170,000 for the homestead of a person seventy or older or that person's unremarried surviving spouse, and proceeds of a voluntary or chapter 21-19 sale are exempt only up to $100,000, and only for one year after the owner receives them. A federal cap of $214,000 under 11 U.S.C. 522(p) can also apply to homestead equity acquired within 1,215 days before filing.
What is the South Dakota median income for the means test?
For cases filed on or after April 1, 2026, the U.S. Trustee Program median family income for South Dakota is $69,190 for 1 earner, $89,809 for 2, $100,883 for 3, and $130,738 for 4, plus $11,100 for each additional person. These figures update about twice a year.
Will I lose my house or car if I file bankruptcy in South Dakota?
Often no. Within the acreage limits the homestead carries no general dollar cap, subject to the $170,000 limit in SDCL 43-45-3 for an owner seventy or older and the federal $214,000 cap on equity acquired within 1,215 days before filing, and you must stay current on the mortgage to keep the home. A vehicle is protected through the $7,000 (head of family) or $5,000 (single) personal-property allowance under SDCL 43-45-4, so equity beyond that can be at risk in Chapter 7.
Does South Dakota have a motor-vehicle exemption?
South Dakota has no separate dollar-capped vehicle exemption. A vehicle is protected as part of the selectable personal-property exemption in SDCL 43-45-4, which allows up to $7,000 in aggregate value for a head of family or $5,000 for a single filer, applied to property the debtor chooses. It is in addition to the homestead and to the absolutely exempt items in SDCL 43-45-2, not an alternative to them.
Where do I file for bankruptcy in South Dakota?
All South Dakota bankruptcy cases are filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Dakota, a single statewide district with hearing locations including Sioux Falls, Pierre, Aberdeen, and Rapid City.
What debts cannot be discharged in a South Dakota bankruptcy?
Most student loans, recent income taxes, child support, alimony, and debts from fraud generally cannot be discharged. Most credit-card debt, medical bills, and personal loans usually can be. A credit-counseling course is required before filing.
Overwhelmed by debt in South Dakota? Get a free bankruptcy consultation
Bankruptcy can stop foreclosure, wage garnishment, and creditor calls, and which debts you can clear and what property you keep depend on South Dakota's exemptions. Get a free, confidential consultation with a South Dakota bankruptcy attorney to understand your options. There is no obligation.
Updates
Corrected the South Dakota homestead section to reflect the $170,000 limit SDCL 43-45-3 places on the homestead of an owner seventy or older and the statute's $100,000 one-year cap on sale proceeds, added the state's $1,000,000 retirement exemption under SDCL 43-45-16, and clarified that the SDCL 43-45-4 personal-property allowance is in addition to the homestead rather than an alternative to it.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
South Dakota Codified Laws, Chapter 43-31: HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION
§ 43-31-30Certain federal bankruptcy exemptions not available.In force
In accordance with the provision of § 522(b) of the Bankruptcy Code of 1978 (11 U.S.C. § 522(b)), residents of this state are not entitled to the federal exemptions provided in § 522(d) of the Bankruptcy Code of 1978 (11 U.S.C. § 522(d)), exemptions which this state specifically does not authorize. Nothing herein affects the exemptions given to residents of this state by the state Constitution and the South Dakota statutes.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at sdlegislature.gov
United States Code Title 11
§ 522ExemptionsIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
In this section— “dependent” includes spouse, whether or not actually dependent; and “value” means fair market value as of the date of the filing of the petition or, with respect to property that becomes property of the estate after such date, as of the date such property becomes property of the estate. Notwithstanding section 541 of this title, an individual debtor may exempt from property of the estate the property listed in either paragraph (2) or, in the alternative, paragraph (3) of this subsection. In joint cases filed under section 302 of this title and individual cases filed under section 301 or 303 of this title by or against debtors who are husband and wife, and whose estates are ordered to be jointly administered under Rule 1015(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, one debtor may not elect to exempt property listed in paragraph (2) and the other debtor elect to exempt property listed in paragraph (3) of this subsection. If the parties cannot agree on the alternative to be elected, they shall be deemed to elect paragraph (2), where such election is permitted under the law of the jurisdiction where the case is filed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 7,574 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz (1992) held that a trustee who does not object within the 30-day period cannot later challenge an exemption claimed under 522(l), even one with no statutory basis. Owen v. Owen (1991) held that 522(f) lien avoidance is not defeated by a state exemption written to exclude lien-encumbered property.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz (Supreme Court of the United States 1992, 503 U.S. 638)✓A Chapter 7 debtor listed the entire proceeds of her TWA discrimination suit as exempt and the trustee let the 30-day objection window lapse; the Court held that under § 522(l) the property is exempt once no one objects, even absent a colorable statutory basis.
- Patterson v. Shumate (Supreme Court of the United States 1992, 504 U.S. 753)✓A debtor's $250,000 ERISA pension interest was excluded from his estate under § 541(c)(2); answering a surplusage argument, the Court read § 522(d)(10)(E) as exempting a broader set of plans, and expressly declined to decide whether § 522(b)(2)(A) also applied.
- Owen v. Owen (Supreme Court of the United States 1991, 500 U.S. 305)✓An ex-wife's judgment lien attached to a Florida condo before state law made it a homestead; the Court held § 522(f) measures impairment against the exemption the debtor would have had but for the lien, so Florida's carve-out for prior liens did not defeat avoidance.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy Laws by State (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Bankruptcy in Alaska (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Bankruptcy in Arkansas (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
§ 362Automatic stayIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a petition filed under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or an application filed under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, operates as a stay, applicable to all entities, of— the commencement or continuation, including the issuance or employment of process, of a judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been commenced before the commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under this title; the enforcement, against the debtor or against property of the estate, of a judgment obtained before the commencement of the case under this title; any act to obtain possession of property of the estate or of property from the estate or to exercise control over property of the estate; any act to create, perfect, or enforce any lien against property of the estate; any act to create, perfect, or enforce against property of the debtor any lien to the extent that such lien secures a claim that arose before the commencement of the case under this title; any act to…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 19,606 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. (1988) held that an undersecured creditor gets no interest as adequate protection under 362(d)(1) for delay caused by the stay. NLRB v. Bildisco & Bildisco (1984) applied 362(a) in requiring claims be pursued through bankruptcy administration, not suit.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Clinton v. Jones (Supreme Court of the United States 1997, 520 U.S. 681)“…ublic interests. Brief for Petitioner 34-36. See, e. g., 11 U. S. C. § 362 (litigation against debtor stayed upon…”
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. (Supreme Court of the United States 1988, 484 U.S. 365)✓An undersecured lender on a Houston apartment project sought monthly payments as the price of continuing the § 362(a) automatic stay; the Court held that 'adequate protection' under § 362(d)(1) does not entitle it to interest for the delay in foreclosing on its collateral.
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1987, 481 U.S. 1)“…if it were forced to file for bankruptcy under Chapter 11. 11 U. S. C. §362 . Texaco, or its successor in interest,…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy in Arizona (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Bankruptcy in Alabama (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Bankruptcy in Georgia (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
United States Code Title 15
§ 1673Restriction on garnishmentIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
Except as provided in subsection (b) and in section 1675 of this title, the maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any workweek which is subjected to garnishment may not exceed 25 per centum of his disposable earnings for that week, or the amount by which his disposable earnings for that week exceed thirty times the Federal minimum hourly wage prescribed by section 206(a)(1) of title 29 in effect at the time the earnings are payable, whichever is less. In the case of earnings for any pay period other than a week, the Secretary of Labor shall by regulation prescribe a multiple of the Federal minimum hourly wage equivalent in effect to that set forth in paragraph (2). The restrictions of subsection (a) do not apply in the case of any order for the support of any person issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or in accordance with an administrative procedure, which is established by State law, which affords substantial due process, and which is subject to judicial review. any order of any court of the United States having jurisdiction over cases under chapter 13 of title 11. any debt due for any State or Federal tax.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 450 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts have read the section 1673 garnishment cap narrowly. Kokoszka v. Belford (1974) held that "disposable earnings" reaches periodic compensation and not an income tax refund, so the cap did not keep a refund out of the bankruptcy estate. Jordan v. Chase Manhattan Bank (2015) held section 1673 creates no private right of action.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hisquierdo v. Hisquierdo (Supreme Court of the United States 1979, 439 U.S. 572)“…and amended § 303 of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, 15 U. S. C. § 1673 (b), to pre-empt state law by limiting…”
- Kokoszka v. Belford (Supreme Court of the United States 1974, 417 U.S. 642)✓A bankrupt argued the 25 percent garnishment cap exempted 75 percent of his $250.90 income tax refund from the trustee; the Supreme Court held Section 1673's limit covers periodic compensation, not a tax refund, so the whole refund passed to the estate.
- Jordan v. Chase Manhattan Bank (District Court, S.D. New York 2015, 91 F. Supp. 3d 491)✓After a Florida garnishment froze a disabled borrower's bank account holding disability benefits, she sued under Section 1673; the court held the section creates no private right of action and is enforced by the Secretary of Labor, and dismissed the claim.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alaska Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Alabama Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Arkansas Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): South Dakota Codified Laws, Chapter 43-45: PERSONAL PROPERTY EXEMPT FROM PROCESS § 43-45-1 (Scope of exemptions of personal property.) · South Dakota Codified Laws, Chapter 43-31: HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION § 43-31-1 (Homestead exempt from judicial sale, judgment lien, and mesne or final process--Mobile homes--Senior citizens.)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- South Dakota Codified Laws Chapter 43-31 (Homestead Exemption), including 43-31-1, 43-31-2, 43-31-4, and opt-out at 43-31-30(sdlegislature.gov).gov
- South Dakota Codified Laws Chapter 43-45 (Personal Property Exempt From Process), including 43-45-2, 43-45-3, 43-45-4, and opt-out at 43-45-13(sdlegislature.gov).gov
- U.S. Trustee Program, Census Bureau Median Family Income by Family Size (cases filed on or after April 1, 2026)(justice.gov).gov
- U.S. Trustee Program, Means Testing overview and forms(justice.gov).gov
- 11 U.S.C. 522 (Exemptions), including 522(b) opt-out and 522(p) homestead cap(law.cornell.edu)
- 11 U.S.C. 362 (Automatic stay)(law.cornell.edu)
- U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of South Dakota, general information and hearing locations(sdb.uscourts.gov).gov
- SDCL 43-45-3, Homestead absolutely exempt, including the $170,000 limit for an owner seventy or older and the $100,000 one-year exemption for sale proceeds (amended SL 2025, ch 185, s 1)(sdlegislature.gov)
- SDCL 43-45-16, exemption from process for up to $1,000,000 in employee benefit plans and the income and distributions from them(sdlegislature.gov)
- SDCL 43-45-4, additional personal-property exemption of $7,000 (head of family) or $5,000, expressly in addition to SDCL 43-45-2 and 43-45-3(sdlegislature.gov)
- SDCL 43-31-4, limited area of homestead: one acre within a town plat, 160 acres outside one(sdlegislature.gov)