Louisiana
Louisiana School Recording Laws: Student and Parent Rights
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 15, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 15, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

In Louisiana, students and parents may record school conversations they participate in without notifying other parties, because Louisiana is a one-party consent state under La. R.S. 15:1303. FERPA does not prohibit parent recording but does regulate how schools handle recordings that become student education records.
Recording in Louisiana schools raises questions that sit at the intersection of state recording laws, federal education privacy protections, school district policies, and parental rights. Louisiana's one-party consent framework under La. R.S. 15:1303 provides the foundation, but federal laws like FERPA and IDEA add layers of complexity that students, parents, and educators need to understand.
This guide covers recording rights for students, parents, and teachers in Louisiana schools, including how FERPA and IDEA interact with state recording law, rules for recording IEP meetings, school surveillance policies, and recording at school board meetings.
Student Recording Rights
Can Students Record in Louisiana Schools?
Under Louisiana's one-party consent law, students can legally record conversations they participate in. A student talking to a teacher, counselor, or administrator can record that conversation without informing the other person. The recording is lawful under state law.
However, practical limitations exist:
- School policies. Most Louisiana school districts have policies restricting or prohibiting cell phone use during class. Students who record in violation of school policy may face disciplinary action.
- Classroom recording. Recording a lecture where the student is a passive listener (not an active participant in a conversation) may be treated differently than recording a one-on-one conversation.
- Other students' privacy. A recording that captures other students' personally identifiable information may create FERPA concerns.
When Students Should Consider Recording
Despite school policies, there are situations where student recording can be valuable:
- Documenting bullying. Recording bullying incidents provides concrete evidence for complaints to school administrators, school boards, or law enforcement.
- Recording disciplinary meetings. If a student faces suspension or expulsion, recording the meeting preserves an exact record of what was said.
- Documenting harassment by staff. If a teacher, coach, or other school employee engages in inappropriate behavior, a recording provides evidence.
- Accessibility needs. Students with disabilities may need to record lectures or instructions as a reasonable accommodation.
Student Cell Phone Policies
Louisiana enacted legislation addressing student cell phone use in schools. Many districts have adopted policies requiring students to store phones during instructional time. These policies can restrict when and where students use recording devices but do not change the underlying legality of one-party consent recording under state law.
The distinction is important:
- A recording made in violation of school phone policy is still legally obtained under La. R.S. 15:1303 if the student was a party to the conversation.
- The student may face school discipline for violating the phone policy, but the recording itself is not illegal.
- The recording may still be admissible as evidence in legal proceedings even if the student was disciplined for making it.
Parent Recording Rights

Recording Conversations With School Staff
Louisiana parents have clear recording rights when interacting with school personnel. Under one-party consent, parents can record:
- Parent-teacher conferences
- Meetings with school administrators and principals
- Conversations with school counselors
- Phone calls with school staff
- Interactions with school bus drivers or transportation staff
- Meetings about behavioral issues or disciplinary actions
No advance notice or permission is required under Louisiana law. Parents often record these conversations to:
- Ensure accuracy of information shared
- Document commitments made by school staff
- Create a record for potential legal proceedings
- Share information with a spouse or attorney who could not attend
Recording IEP Meetings
Individualized Education Program (IEP) meetings are among the most commonly recorded school interactions. Louisiana parents can record IEP meetings they attend under the one-party consent law.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) does not specifically address recording of IEP meetings. The U.S. Department of Education has stated that the decision about whether to allow recording is left to each state. Since Louisiana's one-party consent law permits it, parents can record.
Recommended best practices for recording IEP meetings:
- Consider providing advance notice. While not legally required, informing the school you plan to record can prevent confrontation at the meeting.
- Use a reliable recording device. Ensure the device has sufficient battery and storage.
- Place the recorder where it can capture all participants clearly.
- Preserve the recording. Back it up immediately after the meeting.
- Be prepared for the school to also record. If you notify the school of your intent to record, they may choose to record as well.
When Schools Try to Prohibit Recording
Some Louisiana school districts have policies that prohibit or restrict recording at school meetings. These policies may conflict with state law:
- Louisiana law does not require consent from the school for a parent to record a conversation the parent is participating in.
- A school policy cannot override state law. While the school can express its preference, it cannot make one-party consent recording illegal.
- If a school cancels or postpones a meeting because a parent insists on recording, this may constitute a procedural violation under IDEA if the meeting is an IEP meeting required by federal law.
Parents who face resistance should consult with a special education attorney or contact the Louisiana Department of Education for guidance.
FERPA and Recording

What FERPA Protects
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) protects the privacy of student education records. FERPA applies to all schools that receive federal funding, which includes virtually all Louisiana public schools.
Under FERPA:
- Student education records are protected from unauthorized disclosure. This includes grades, disciplinary records, IEP documents, and other personally identifiable information.
- Recordings that become education records are subject to FERPA protections. A school that records a meeting and stores it in a student's file has created an education record.
- Parent-made recordings are generally not considered education records under FERPA because they are not maintained by the school.
How FERPA Affects Recording in Schools
FERPA creates specific considerations for recording in school settings:
- Recording other students. If your recording captures personally identifiable information about other students (names, grades, behavioral information), sharing that recording publicly could create FERPA complications for the school if the recording was made as part of school operations.
- Classroom recordings. A recording of a classroom that captures other students' responses, behaviors, or personal information should be handled carefully.
- IEP meeting recordings. Your recording of your child's IEP meeting is your personal record. The school's recording of the same meeting becomes an education record.
FERPA Does Not Prohibit Parent Recording
It is important to understand that FERPA does not give schools the authority to prohibit parents from recording. FERPA governs what the school can disclose, not what a parent can record during a meeting the parent is attending. Some schools incorrectly cite FERPA as a reason to ban recording, but this interpretation is not supported by the statute or DOE guidance.
School Security Cameras

Where Schools Can Install Cameras
Louisiana public schools routinely use security camera systems for student safety and property protection. Legal camera locations include:
- Hallways and corridors
- Cafeterias and common areas
- School entrances and exits
- Parking lots and bus loading areas
- Gymnasiums (general areas)
- Playgrounds and outdoor spaces
- Libraries and media centers
- Administrative offices (public areas)
Where Schools Cannot Install Cameras
Under La. R.S. 14:283, cameras are prohibited in areas where students have a reasonable expectation of privacy:
- Bathrooms and restrooms
- Locker rooms and changing areas
- Shower facilities
- Nurse's office examination areas
- Private counseling rooms (video cameras; audio concerns also apply)
Placing cameras in these locations for a lewd or lascivious purpose, or to capture the specific intimate content described in the statute, would constitute video voyeurism under La. R.S. 14:283, a criminal offense with enhanced penalties that apply when the offender acts with the intent to arouse or gratify sexual desire and the victim is under 17.
School Bus Cameras
Security cameras on Louisiana school buses are legal and increasingly common. These cameras monitor student behavior, document incidents, and provide evidence in accident investigations. The Louisiana Department of Education supports the use of bus cameras as a safety measure.
Recording at School Board Meetings
Open Meetings Law
Louisiana's Open Meetings Law (La. R.S. 42:11-28) guarantees the public's right to attend and record school board meetings. The statute explicitly states that all proceedings in a public meeting may be video or tape recorded, filmed, or broadcast live.
This means:
- School boards cannot prohibit recording at open public meetings
- You can use cameras, smartphones, and audio recorders at board meetings
- Livestreaming is permitted at open meetings
- Certain larger school districts may be required to broadcast meetings live
Executive Sessions
School boards can enter executive (closed) sessions for specific purposes defined by law, such as discussing personnel matters, pending litigation, or security procedures. Recording during executive sessions is subject to different rules, and boards may restrict recording during these closed portions.
Teacher and Staff Recording Rights
Can Teachers Record in Louisiana Schools?
Teachers in Louisiana can record conversations they participate in under the one-party consent law. This includes:
- Conversations with students (when the teacher is a direct participant)
- Meetings with administrators, parents, or colleagues
- Phone calls with parents or school officials
Teacher Considerations
While legally permitted, teacher recording involves additional considerations:
- School district policy. Many districts have policies about recording that teachers are expected to follow as employees.
- Student privacy. Recordings that capture student information may create FERPA obligations.
- Union agreements. Collective bargaining agreements may address recording in the workplace.
- Professional expectations. Recording without disclosure, while legal, may affect professional relationships.
Recording for Professional Protection
Teachers may find recording valuable for:
- Documenting interactions with difficult parents
- Preserving evidence of administrative decisions or directives
- Recording meetings related to performance evaluations
- Documenting student behavioral incidents (with awareness of FERPA)
Special Education Recording Rights
IDEA Protections
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act provides parents of children with disabilities specific rights regarding their child's education. While IDEA does not explicitly address recording, the procedural safeguards it provides support parental involvement in ways that recording facilitates:
- Meaningful participation. Parents have the right to meaningfully participate in IEP meetings. Recording ensures they can review what was discussed.
- Informed consent. Recording helps parents document that proper informed consent procedures were followed.
- Dispute resolution. Recordings can be evidence in IDEA due process hearings, state complaints, and mediation.
Due Process Hearings
Recordings of IEP meetings and other school interactions are admissible in IDEA due process hearings in Louisiana. These hearings are conducted through the Louisiana Department of Education's Division of Special Education. A recording made lawfully under La. R.S. 15:1303 is a valid form of evidence.
More Louisiana Recording Laws
Audio Recording | Video Recording | Voyeurism & Hidden Cameras | Workplace Recording | Recording Police | Phone Call Recording | Security Cameras | Recording in Public | Landlord-Tenant | Dashcam Laws | Schools | Medical Recording
Back to Louisiana Recording Laws
More Louisiana Recording Topics
More Louisiana Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can parents record IEP meetings in Louisiana?
Yes. Louisiana's one-party consent law under La. R.S. 15:1303 permits parents to record IEP meetings they attend without informing other participants. While providing advance notice is recommended as a best practice, it is not legally required.
Can students record teachers in Louisiana?
Under Louisiana state law, students can record conversations they participate in with teachers. However, school cell phone and device policies may restrict when and where students can use recording devices. Violating school policy can result in discipline, even though the recording itself is legal.
Can schools prohibit recording at school board meetings?
No. Louisiana's Open Meetings Law (La. R.S. 42:11-28) explicitly permits the public to video record, audio record, film, and broadcast all proceedings at public school board meetings. The board cannot prohibit recording at open public meetings.
Can schools install cameras in locker rooms in Louisiana?
No. Cameras placed in locker rooms, bathrooms, changing areas, or shower facilities for a lewd or lascivious purpose, or to capture the intimate content described in the statute, violate Louisiana's video voyeurism law La. R.S. 14:283. Offenses involving minors under 17 committed with intent to arouse or gratify sexual desire carry 2 to 10 years at hard labor and mandatory sex offender registration.
Does FERPA prohibit parents from recording at school?
No. FERPA governs what schools can disclose about student education records. It does not give schools the authority to prohibit parents from recording conversations they participate in. Parent-made recordings are personal records, not school-maintained education records subject to FERPA.
Updates
Repointed misrouted statute citations to verified sources for the sections the page actually cites.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Clarified that a school security camera only becomes criminal video voyeurism under La. R.S. 14:283 when placed for a lewd/lascivious purpose or to capture the statute's specific intimate content, and that the enhanced minor-victim penalty requires intent to arouse or gratify sexual desire, not merely a victim under 17.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Louisiana Revised Statutes
§ 15:1303Interception and disclosure of wire, electronic, or oral communicationsIn forcecited in 36 of our articles
A. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Chapter, it shall be unlawful for any person to: (1) Willfully intercept, endeavor to intercept, or procure any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, electronic or oral communication; (2) Willfully use, endeavor to use, or procure any other person to use or endeavor to use, any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when: (a) Such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire or electronic communication; or (b) Such device transmits communications by radio or interferes with the transmission of such communication; (3) Willfully disclose, or endeavor to disclose, to any other person the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, electronic, or oral communication in violation of this Subsection; or (4) Willfully use, or endeavor to use, the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 25 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Louisiana courts apply the consent exception in La. R.S. 15:1303. Smith v. Smith (2005) held a parent may consent for a child where he has a good faith, reasonable basis that it serves the child’s best interest, placing the recording within 15:1303(C)(4). Keller v. Aymond (1998) held willfulness is not required for civil liability.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Smith v. Smith (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2005, 923 So. 2d 732)✓A father secretly taped his daughter's calls with her mother in his own home during a custody fight; the court applied vicarious consent and held his good faith, objectively reasonable belief that taping served the child's best interest fell within La. R.S. 15:1303(C)(4).
- Johnson v. Aymond (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1998, 709 So. 2d 1072)✓A newspaper printed excerpts of a phone conversation a defendant had allegedly taped and handed out at a press conference; the court held those allegations, accepted as true, state a cause of action under the literal language of La. R.S. 15:1303(A)(4), and reversed the dismissal.
- Keller v. Aymond (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1998, 722 So. 2d 1224)✓A newspaper published excerpts of private calls taped by another and handed out at a press conference; the court held criminal willfulness under section 1303 is not needed for civil damages, and that fact issues over the paper's reason to know barred summary judgment under 1303.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Louisiana HB 410: Recording-Notice Bill Heads to the Governor (2026), Louisiana HB 475: Disclosure Required Before AI-Recorded Medical Visits, Louisiana Smart Glasses Recording Laws (2026)
§ 14:283Video voyeurism; penaltiesIn forcecited in 30 of our articles
A. Video voyeurism is any of the following: (1) The use of any camera, videotape, photo-optical, photo-electric, or any other image recording device, or an unmanned aircraft system equipped with any camera, videotape, photo-optical, photo-electric, or any other image recording device, for the purpose of observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping a person where that person has not consented to the specific instance of observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping and either: (a) It is for a lewd or lascivious purpose. (b) The observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping is as described in Paragraph (B)(3) of this Section and occurs in a place where an identifiable person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. (2) The transfer of an image obtained by activity described in Paragraph (1) of this Subsection by live or recorded telephone message, electronic mail, the Internet, or a commercial online service.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 16 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):In State v. Schaller (2009) a Louisiana appeals court set out the elements of La. R.S. 14:283 and, since the statute does not define lewd or lascivious, applied a definition of an act tending to excite lust, rejecting a claimed babysitting reason for a hidden bedroom camera. State v. Boudreaux (2006) found 56 consecutive years excessive.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Batiste (Supreme Court of Louisiana 2006, 939 So. 2d 1245)“…Batiste, charging him with video voyeurism, a violation of La. R.S. 14:283. [1] At his arraignment on December *…”
- State v. Boudreaux (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2006, 945 So. 2d 898)✓A stepfather hid a wireless camera in his 18-year-old stepdaughter's bedroom and taped her for four months. He pleaded guilty to 14 counts of video voyeurism, and the court vacated the 56-year consecutive sentence as excessive because the acts formed a single scheme.
- State v. Perry (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2012, 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 298)✓A houseguest was secretly videotaped drying off in the family's guest bathroom. The court affirmed the video voyeurism conviction and three-year sentence, addressing only whether the untimely pretrial motions were properly denied, not the reach of the statute.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Louisiana Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties, Louisiana Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Rights and Restrictions, Louisiana Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
§ 42:11Short titleIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
This Chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Open Meetings Law". NOTE: Former R.S. 42:11 was redesignated as R.S. 42:26 by Acts 2010, No. 861, §23.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 31 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Louisiana High School Athletics Ass'n v. State (Supreme Court of Louisiana 2013, 107 So. 3d 583)“…(l)(b)(v), because it is subject to the Open Meetings Law, La. R.S. 42:11 et seq., 8 and is partially funded by…”
- Deep South Center for Environmental Justice, Vayla New Orleans, Justice and Beyond, 350 New Orleans, Sierra Club, Mr. Theodore Quant and Ms. Renate Heurich v. the Council of the City of New Orleans, the Utility, Cable, Telecommunications and Technology Committee of the New Orleans City Council, Jason R. Williams, Stacy Head, Susan G. Guidry, Latoya Cantrell, Nadine M. Ramsey, Jared C. Brossett, and James A. Gray, II (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2020)“…leans East due to the violations of the Open Meetings Law, La. R.S. 42:11, et seq. that occurred at the Council’s…”
- Midyett v. Midyett (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1999, 744 So. 2d 669)“…7:1287(C) and (F); La. R.S. 37:2666(B); La. R.S. 40:2010.9; La. R.S. 42:11(C); Joyner v. Wear, 27,631 (La.App.2d…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Louisiana Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and the Buffer Zone Law, Louisiana Laws on Recording in Public: Rights, Limits, and Exceptions
§ 42:23Audio and video recordings; live broadcastIn force
A. All of the proceedings in a public meeting may be video or tape recorded, filmed, or broadcast live. B.(1) Each nonelected board or commission that has the authority to levy a tax shall video or audio record, film, or broadcast live all proceedings in a public meeting. (2)(a)(i) The parish governing authority in a parish with a population of twenty-five thousand or more shall broadcast live all of its proceedings in public meetings, including the parish governing authority's committee meetings. (ii) Each school board in a parish with a population of twenty-five thousand or more shall broadcast live all of its proceedings in public meetings, including the school board's committee meetings. (iii) Each governing authority of a municipality with a population of ten thousand or more shall broadcast live all city council meetings including city council committee meetings. There is no requirement to broadcast a committee meeting where members are volunteers. (b) For purposes of this Paragraph, "broadcast live" means the publicly available distribution of audio and video of a meeting in real or near real time via the internet or television broadcast.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Traci Fernandez Versus City of Kenner, Tom Wilmott, Kristi Katsanis McKinney, Gregory Carrol, Michael Sigur, Glenn Hayes, George Brannigan, and Brian Brennan (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2021)“…Court against Defendants alleging that Defendants violated La. R.S. 42:23 of Louisiana’s Open Meetings Law by pr…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- La. R.S. 15:1303(legis.la.gov).gov
- La. R.S. 14:283 - Video Voyeurism(legis.la.gov).gov
- La. R.S. 42:23 - Open Meetings: Audio and Video Recordings; Live Broadcast(law.justia.com)
- FERPA FAQs(studentprivacy.ed.gov).gov
- IDEA(sites.ed.gov).gov
- Louisiana Dept. of Education(louisianabelieves.com).gov
- Student Privacy Policy Office(studentprivacy.ed.gov).gov