Kansas
Truck Accident Laws in Kansas (2026): Deadlines & Liability
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

A collision with a commercial truck in Kansas is governed by two different bodies of law at once. State law sets the deadline to file, decides how shared fault affects recovery, and runs the state's no-fault insurance system. A separate layer of federal trucking regulation, enforced by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), sets safety rules for the driver and the trucking company, and violations of those rules are frequently the central evidence in a serious truck case.
This guide explains the Kansas deadlines and rules first, then the uniform federal trucking framework that applies in every state. It is general legal information, not legal advice about any specific case.
This guide is part of our Truck Accident Laws by State series.
The deadline to file in Kansas
Under K.S.A. 60-513, an action for injury to the person must be brought within two years. For a truck-crash injury, that two-year clock generally starts on the date of the collision. Kansas also recognizes a discovery rule for injuries that are not reasonably ascertainable at first, but it imposes an absolute ten-year outer limit on most such claims.
A Kansas wrongful-death action, brought when a crash is fatal, also carries a two-year limit, and that period runs from the date of death rather than the date of the underlying collision. Because missing the deadline almost always ends a claim, the date should be confirmed early.
The no-fault system adds a separate 18-month mark that is often described as a second deadline but is not one. Under K.S.A. 40-3113a(c), an injured person who has not sued the at-fault party within 18 months of the accident assigns to the PIP insurer the cause of action only "for the purpose and to the extent of recovery of damages which are duplicative of personal injury protection benefits." The remainder of the claim, including pain and suffering and economic losses PIP did not pay, stays with the injured person until the two-year bar in K.S.A. 60-513. Passing 18 months narrows what is left to recover; it does not end the right to sue.
How shared fault works: modified comparative negligence
Kansas follows modified comparative fault under K.S.A. 60-258a. An injured party can still recover even if partly at fault, but only if that party's negligence is less than the combined fault of everyone else. In practice this is the 50 percent bar: if you are found 50 percent or more responsible, you recover nothing.
When recovery is allowed, the award is reduced by your share. If a jury values the damages at $1,000,000 and assigns you 25 percent of the fault, the recovery is $750,000. Because trucking companies and their insurers often try to shift blame onto the injured driver to push them over the 50 percent line, the fault allocation is usually a central fight in a truck case.
No-fault insurance and the tort threshold
Kansas is a no-fault state under the Kansas Automobile Injury Reparations Act. Every standard auto policy includes personal injury protection (PIP), which pays your own medical bills, a portion of lost wages, and certain other costs after a crash regardless of who was at fault.

To step outside no-fault and sue the at-fault party for pain and suffering and other non-economic harm, you must meet a tort threshold in K.S.A. 40-3117. The threshold is satisfied when the injury requires medical treatment with a reasonable value of $2,000 or more, or when the injury involves permanent disfigurement, a fracture to a weight-bearing bone, a compound, comminuted, displaced or compressed fracture, loss of a body member, permanent injury within reasonable medical probability, permanent loss of a bodily function, or death. The serious injuries typical of a heavy-truck collision almost always clear this threshold, but it must be met before non-economic damages are recoverable.
Damage caps
Kansas does not cap compensatory damages in a personal-injury case. The Kansas Supreme Court struck down the longstanding statutory cap on noneconomic damages in 2019 (Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.), so pain-and-suffering and other noneconomic awards are no longer limited by that statute. Separate rules can still apply to punitive damages, which require a higher showing and are addressed under their own provisions.
Fatal crashes are the exception, and it is an important one in truck litigation. Hilburn struck K.S.A. 60-19a02, the personal-injury noneconomic cap. A different section, K.S.A. 60-1903(a), remains in force and provides that damages in a wrongful-death action, other than pecuniary loss sustained by an heir at law, cannot exceed $250,000 in the aggregate. Subsection (b) applies that ceiling after any reduction for comparative fault under K.S.A. 60-258a, and the jury is not instructed about the limit.
State auto-insurance context
Kansas drivers must carry minimum liability coverage of 25/50/25 (in thousands: $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident for bodily injury, $25,000 for property damage), plus PIP and uninsured-motorist coverage, per the Kansas Department of Insurance. Those state minimums are modest. Commercial trucks operating in interstate commerce are instead governed primarily by the much higher federal financial-responsibility rules described below.
Federal trucking rules: the FMCSA layer
Commercial trucks are regulated by the FMCSA under Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. These rules are the same nationwide, and a violation is often powerful evidence of negligence. The core areas include:

- Hours of service. Under 49 CFR Part 395, a property-carrying driver may drive up to 11 hours after 10 consecutive hours off duty, may not drive beyond the 14th hour after coming on duty, must take a 30-minute break after 8 hours of driving, and is capped at 60 hours in 7 days or 70 hours in 8 days. Fatigue and falsified logs are recurring issues in truck crashes.
- Electronic logging devices (ELDs). Most drivers must record their hours with an ELD that meets Part 395, replacing paper logs and creating a digital record of driving time.
- Driver qualification and CDL. Drivers must hold a valid commercial driver's license and meet medical and qualification standards under the federal rules.
- Drug and alcohol testing. Carriers must run pre-employment, random, post-accident, and reasonable-suspicion testing programs.
- Vehicle maintenance and inspection. Trucks must be systematically inspected, repaired, and maintained, with records kept, under the federal maintenance rules.
Who can be held liable
A truck case routinely involves more potential defendants than an ordinary car crash, and many of them are companies:
- the driver, for negligent driving;
- the motor carrier (the trucking company), often vicariously responsible for its driver and directly liable for negligent hiring, training, supervision, or retention;
- a broker or shipper in some circumstances;
- a cargo loader, when improperly loaded or unsecured freight contributes to a crash;
- a parts or equipment manufacturer, if a defective component such as brakes or tires played a role.
Identifying every responsible party matters because, under Kansas comparative fault, fault is allocated among all of them. How much each one pays matters just as much: K.S.A. 60-258a(d) makes each party liable only for the portion of the total award that its own causal negligence bears to the causal negligence of all parties against whom recovery is permitted. Kansas therefore has no joint and several liability in a comparative-fault case, so naming a solvent motor carrier does not make it answerable for another defendant's share, and proving fault against each party in its own right is what determines the recovery.
Federal minimum insurance
Federal law requires far more coverage from interstate trucks than Kansas requires from cars. Under 49 CFR 387.9, a for-hire motor carrier transporting general (non-hazardous) freight in interstate commerce must maintain at least $750,000 in liability coverage. Carriers hauling certain hazardous materials must carry substantially higher limits. This federal floor is one reason truck claims differ sharply from car claims.
Why preserving evidence early matters
Much of the best evidence in a truck case is electronic and can be lost. ELD and logbook data, the truck's engine control module or "black box" data, dashcam footage, and maintenance and inspection records can be overwritten or routinely discarded on a short cycle. Because of that, a written preservation (spoliation) letter sent to the carrier early can be important to keep that evidence from disappearing. The police crash report, photographs of the scene and vehicles, and your own medical records should also be preserved.

How injury cases are typically handled
Most personal-injury attorneys evaluate truck cases on a contingency-fee basis and offer a free initial consultation, meaning fees are generally a percentage of any recovery rather than an upfront charge. No lawyer can promise a particular outcome or amount, and every case turns on its own facts and evidence. Because Kansas deadlines are strict and trucking evidence can disappear quickly, it is generally wise to evaluate options well before the two-year limit.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the deadline to sue for a truck accident in Kansas?
Two years. K.S.A. 60-513 gives most personal-injury claims, including truck-crash injuries, two years from the date of injury. A wrongful-death claim is also two years, measured from the date of death. The 18-month mark in the no-fault statute, K.S.A. 40-3113a(c), is not a separate deadline: missing it assigns to the PIP insurer only the part of the cause of action seeking damages duplicative of PIP benefits, while the claim for pain and suffering and other non-duplicative losses stays with you until the two-year bar.
Who can be sued after a truck accident in Kansas?
Often several parties: the driver, the trucking company (both for its driver's conduct and for negligent hiring, training, or supervision), and depending on the facts a broker or shipper, the company that loaded the cargo, or the maker of a defective truck part. Identifying every responsible party matters because Kansas allocates fault among all of them, and because under K.S.A. 60-258a(d) each defendant is liable only for its own proportionate share of the award rather than the whole of it.
How is a truck accident different from a car accident in Kansas?
Trucks are governed by federal FMCSA safety rules (hours of service, ELDs, driver qualification, drug-and-alcohol testing, and maintenance) whose violation is strong negligence evidence; interstate trucks must carry at least $750,000 in liability coverage rather than a small car-policy minimum; there are usually multiple, often corporate, defendants; and key evidence is electronic and can be overwritten, so early preservation matters.
How much is a truck accident case worth in Kansas?
There is no formula and no way to promise an amount. Value depends on the severity and permanence of the injuries, medical costs, lost income, the available insurance, and the allocation of fault. Kansas does not cap compensatory damages in a personal-injury case, but a wrongful-death claim is capped at $250,000 for damages other than an heir's pecuniary loss under K.S.A. 60-1903(a). Recovery is also reduced by your share of fault and barred entirely if you are 50 percent or more responsible.
Injured in Kansas? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Kansas personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Corrected the 18-month no-fault rule, which assigns only the PIP-duplicative part of a claim to the insurer rather than ending the right to sue, added the $250,000 Kansas wrongful-death damages cap, and noted that each defendant pays only its own proportionate share of fault.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 60: PROCEDURE, CIVIL
§ 60-258aComparative negligence.In forcecited in 10 of our articles
(a) Effect of contributory negligence. The contributory negligence of a party in a civil action does not bar that party or its legal representative from recovering damages for negligence resulting in death, personal injury, property damage or economic loss, if that party's negligence was less than the causal negligence of the party or parties against whom a claim is made, but the award of damages to that party must be reduced in proportion to the amount of negligence attributed to that party. If a party claims damages for a decedent's wrongful death, the negligence of the decedent, if any, must be imputed to that party. (b) Special verdicts or findings required. When the comparative negligence of the parties is an issue, the jury must return special verdicts, or in the absence of a jury, the court must make special findings, determining the percentage of negligence attributable to each party and the total amount of damages sustained by each claimant. The court must determine the appropriate judgment. (c) Joining additional parties.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 247 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Brown v. Keill (1978) held that under K.S.A. 60-258a joint and several liability no longer applies, each defendant paying in proportion to its own fault, with the fault of persons not joined still compared. Kennedy v. City of Sawyer (1980) applied those comparative fault principles to strict liability and implied warranty claims.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Brown v. Keill (Supreme Court of Kansas 1978, 224 Kan. 195)✓A car owner sued the other driver over damage to his Jaguar; his son drove it and drew 90 percent of the fault at trial. The court held K.S.A. 60-258a abolished joint and several liability, capping the defendant at 10 percent, and let the unjoined son's fault be compared.
- Kennedy v. City of Sawyer (Supreme Court of Kansas 1980, 228 Kan. 439)✓A city employee sprayed an arsenic herbicide by its sewage lagoons and neighboring cattle died. Reading K.S.A. 60-258a, the court held its fault comparison reaches products claims joined with negligence, and replaced all-or-nothing implied indemnity with apportionment.
- Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. (Supreme Court of Kansas 1984, 235 Kan. 387)✓A woman who suffered kidney failure after taking an oral contraceptive won a failure-to-warn verdict. Applying K.S.A. 60-258a, the court held the trial judge properly refused to compare the fault of her settled physicians or of the plaintiff, since no causal negligence was shown.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Motorcycle Accident Laws in Kansas (2026): Deadlines & Helmets, Kansas Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Kansas Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do
§ 60-513Actions limited to two years.In forcecited in 11 of our articles
(a) The following actions shall be brought within two years: (1) An action for trespass upon real property. (2) An action for taking, detaining or injuring personal property, including actions for the specific recovery thereof. (3) An action for relief on the ground of fraud, but the cause of action shall not be deemed to have accrued until the fraud is discovered. (4) An action for injury to the rights of another, not arising on contract, and not herein enumerated. (5) An action for wrongful death. (6) An action to recover for an ionizing radiation injury as provided in K.S.A. 60-513a, 60-513b and 60-513c, and amendments thereto. (7) An action arising out of the rendering of or failure to render professional services by a health care provider, not arising on contract.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 762 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Martindale v. Tenny (Supreme Court of Kansas 1992, 250 Kan. 621)“…two-year and four-year statutes of limitation set forth in K.S.A. 60-513(a)(7) and K.S.A. 60-513(c) barred the a…”
- Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc. (Supreme Court of Kansas 1997, 262 Kan. 635)“…der the general statutes of limitations of K.S.A 60-512 and K.S.A. 60-513. The parties framed the issues in such…”
- Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc. (Supreme Court of Kansas 1990, 246 Kan. 336)“…imitations was shortened as to medical malpractice actions (K.S.A. 60-513); and the collateral source rule was mo…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Medical Malpractice Laws in Kansas (2026): Deadlines & Caps, Kansas Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability Under the Reasonable-Care Standard, Kansas Wrongful Death Laws (2026): Deadlines & Who Can Sue
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 40: INSURANCE
§ 40-3117Tort actions; conditions precedent to recovery of damages for pain and suffering.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
In any action for tort brought against the owner, operator or occupant of a motor vehicle or against any person legally responsible for the acts or omissions of such owner, operator or occupant, a plaintiff may recover damages in tort for pain, suffering, mental anguish, inconvenience and other non-pecuniary loss because of injury only in the event the injury requires medical treatment of a kind described in this act as medical benefits, having a reasonable value of $2,000 or more, or the injury consists in whole or in part of permanent disfigurement, a fracture to a weightbearing bone, a compound, comminuted, displaced or compressed fracture, loss of a body member, permanent injury within reasonable medical probability, permanent loss of a bodily function or death. Any person who is entitled to receive free medical and surgical benefits shall be deemed in compliance with the requirements of this section upon a showing that the medical treatment received has an equivalent value of at least $2,000.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Manzanares v. Bell (Supreme Court of Kansas 1974, 214 Kan. 589)“…on was entitled to receive. *595 (5) Section 17 changed K.S.A. 40-3117 ( a ) by removing the tort "shield" pro…”
- Kansas Malpractice Victims Coalition v. Bell (Supreme Court of Kansas 1988, 243 Kan. 333)“…limits on the right to recovery. 214 Kan. at 599 . Under K.S.A. 40-3117, any person who was entitled to no-faul…”
- Martinez v. MILBURN ENTERPRISES, INC. (Supreme Court of Kansas 2010, 290 Kan. 572)“…of noneconomic damages in a motor vehicle tort action under K.S.A. 40-3117. Based upon Bates' holding on Medicai…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Car Accident Laws: No-Fault, PIP, Insurance, and Your Claim
Code of Federal Regulations Title 49
§ 387.9Financial responsibility, minimum levels.In forcecited in 52 of our articles
The minimum levels of financial responsibility referred to in § 387.7 are hereby prescribed as follows: Table 1 to § 387.9—Schedule of Limits—Public Liability Type of carriage Commodity transported January 1, 1985 (1) For-hire (In interstate or foreign commerce, with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Property (nonhazardous) $750,000 (2) For-hire and Private (In interstate, foreign, or intrastate commerce, with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Hazardous substances, as defined in 49 CFR 171.8, transported in bulk in cargo tanks, portable tanks, or hopper-type vehicles; in bulk Division 1.1, 1.2 or 1.3 materials; in bulk Division 2.3, Hazard Zone A material; in bulk Division 6.1, Packing Group I, Hazard Zone A material, in bulk Division 2.1 or 2.2 material; or highway route controlled quantities of a Class 7 material, as defined in 49 CFR 173.403 5,000,000 (3) For-hire and Private (In interstate or foreign commerce, in any quantity; or in intrastate commerce, in bulk only; with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Oil listed in 49 CFR 172.101; hazardous waste, hazardous materials, or hazardous substances defined in 49…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 45 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Yeates (2009) held an MCS-90 endorsement applies only where the underlying policy gives no coverage and the carrier's insurance falls below the minimums 49 CFR 387.9 prescribes. GREAT WEST CAS. v. General Cas. Co. of Wisconsin (2010) found that purpose met once other coverage exceeded the 387.9 amount.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- GREAT WEST CAS. v. General Cas. Co. of Wisconsin (District Court, D. Minnesota 2010, 734 F. Supp. 2d 718)“…ardous commodities is $750,000. 49 U.S.C. § 31139 (b)(2); 49 C.F.R. § 387.9 . Under the Federal Motor Carrie…”
- Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Yeates (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2009, 584 F.3d 868)✓A trucker's own insurer paid the Yeateses the full $750,000 that section 387.9 sets as the minimum for non-hazardous property, and the en banc court held a second insurer's MCS-90 endorsement was therefore never triggered and added no coverage.
- American Inter-Fidelity Exchange v. American Re-Insurance Company (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 1994, 17 F.3d 1018)✓A truck insurer sought reinsurance for $846,256 in deductibles it paid accident victims but could not collect; the court read the mandatory endorsement to require insurers to cover victims from the first dollar up to section 387.9's minimums, and reversed the dismissal.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Truck Accident Laws in Connecticut (2026): Deadlines & Liability, Truck Accident Laws in Alabama (2026): Deadlines & Liability, Truck Accident Laws in Iowa (2026): Deadlines & Liability
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- K.S.A. 60-513: two-year statute of limitations for personal-injury actions (with discovery rule and ten-year outer limit)(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 60-258a: Kansas modified comparative fault statute (recovery barred if negligence is not less than the combined fault of others)(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 40-3117: no-fault tort threshold for non-economic damages ($2,000 medical or qualifying injury) and 18-month suit provision(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- 49 CFR Part 395: FMCSA hours-of-service and ELD requirements for commercial drivers(ecfr.gov).gov
- 49 CFR 387.9: minimum levels of financial responsibility ($750,000 for general-freight for-hire interstate carriers)(ecfr.gov).gov
- FMCSA hours-of-service overview (11-hour, 14-hour, 30-minute break, 60/70-hour limits)(fmcsa.dot.gov).gov
- Kansas Department of Insurance: state minimum auto liability, PIP, and uninsured-motorist requirements(insurance.ks.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 40-3113a: PIP subrogation and the 18-month assignment to the insurer, limited to damages duplicative of PIP benefits(ksrevisor.gov)
- K.S.A. 60-1903: $250,000 aggregate cap on wrongful-death damages other than an heir's pecuniary loss, applied after comparative-fault reductions(ksrevisor.gov)