Kansas
Kansas Drone Laws: Stalking Act & Privacy Rules Explained
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Kansas has no dedicated drone-privacy statute. Instead, flying a drone to spy on someone at their home is harassment under the state's stalking law, K.S.A. 60-31a02, and a 2025 law separately bars government drones built with parts from countries such as China or Russia.
This guide is part of our Drone Laws by State series; for the broader rules on recording people in Kansas, see our surveillance camera laws guide.
Jurisdiction scope: This article addresses Kansas law governing private and law-enforcement drone use under K.S.A. 60-31a02, K.S.A. 21-5427, K.S.A. 47-1827, K.S.A. 32-1003, and the Kansas Land and Military Installation Protection Act. It does not address FAA registration, Remote ID, or Part 107 pilot certification, which apply the same way nationwide regardless of state law.
How federal and Kansas law divide drone authority
The FAA controls where a drone may fly nationwide. Under 49 U.S.C. section 40102, it classifies any unmanned aircraft as an "aircraft," regardless of size. A commercial flight generally needs a Remote Pilot Certificate under 14 C.F.R. Part 107; a hobbyist flight falls under the separate exception at 49 U.S.C. section 44809. Most registrable drones must also broadcast Remote ID since 2023.
That federal structure does not answer whether a Kansas neighbor can legally record you with a drone, or whether Kansas police need a warrant to fly one over your yard. Kansas answers those questions with light statutory coverage compared to many states, but not with a single statute. Only one Kansas provision names unmanned aerial systems outright, K.S.A. 60-31a02, and it is a civil definition rather than a criminal prohibition. Three further statutes reach drone flight without ever using the word: K.S.A. 47-1827, which criminalizes low-altitude overflight of an animal facility or a research field crop area; K.S.A. 32-1003, on taking and locating game; and the 2025 procurement law aimed at foreign-made hardware rather than privacy.

Can a private citizen legally fly a drone over my property in Kansas?
Kansas does not have a standalone drone-privacy statute the way Kentucky, Florida, or Texas do. Instead, the legislature folded drone surveillance into the state's existing Protection from Stalking Act. K.S.A. 60-31a02 defines harassment as a knowing and intentional course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes that person and serves no legitimate purpose, and it expressly provides that harassment "shall include any course of conduct carried out through the use of an unmanned aerial system over or near any dwelling, occupied vehicle or other place where one may reasonably expect to be safe from uninvited intrusion or surveillance."
Two features matter for how this actually works. First, it requires a course of conduct, meaning two or more separate acts over time, so an isolated single overflight is unlikely by itself to meet the statutory bar. Second, K.S.A. 60-31a02 is purely definitional and sits inside a civil act, so the remedy it supports is civil: a target can petition a Kansas court for a protection-from-stalking order against the drone operator.
Criminal stalking is a different statute, K.S.A. 21-5427, and it is textually independent of that civil definition. It builds its own course of conduct at 21-5427(f)(1) out of a list of qualifying acts, threatening a person's safety, following, appearing in close proximity, damaging property, using an electronic tracking system, and communicating with the target among them, and it does not mention drones or unmanned aerial systems anywhere. A sustained pattern of overflights could in principle satisfy that general definition, but the criminal code nowhere says so the way 60-31a02 does for the civil claim.
Where criminal stalking is charged, a first conviction is generally a class A person misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in jail and a $2,500 fine. A second conviction has no single ceiling. It is a severity level 7 person felony for reckless stalking under 21-5427(a)(1), a severity level 5 person felony for knowing stalking under (a)(2), and a severity level 4 person felony where the course of conduct targeted a child. Kansas numbers its severity levels downward, so level 4 is the most serious of the three, and the knowing branch is the one a deliberate campaign of drone harassment would most naturally fit.
Outside the stalking-law context, a Kansas property owner bothered by a drone is generally left to general common-law trespass, nuisance, or invasion-of-privacy principles rather than a drone-specific statute, since Kansas has not enacted a broader civilian image-capture law like the ones now in place in Kentucky, Florida, or North Carolina.
One Kansas criminal statute does reach low-altitude drone flight over private ground directly, even though it never uses the word drone. K.S.A. 47-1827 makes it a class A nonperson misdemeanor to fly an aircraft in the airspace directly above an animal facility, or directly above the field crop production area of a research or product development program, below the minimum safe altitude prescribed in 14 C.F.R. 91.119(c), without the owner's consent. Federal law already classifies an unmanned aircraft as an aircraft, so a drone flown low over a covered Kansas animal facility or research crop area without permission falls inside it. That language was added by 2024 Session Laws chapter 109, section 3, effective July 1, 2024. It protects agricultural and research operations rather than homes, so it does nothing for a homeowner watching a neighbor's drone circle the back yard.
Does police need a warrant to fly a drone over my property in Kansas?
Kansas has not enacted a statute that directly requires law enforcement to obtain a warrant before flying a drone, unlike the roughly dozen states that have. That silence does not mean police drone use is unregulated; it means the analysis defaults to ordinary Fourth Amendment and Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights section 15 search-and-seizure case law rather than a specific statutory floor written for drones.
In practice, that means whether a given warrantless drone flight by Kansas law enforcement was lawful turns on the same doctrines that would apply to any other warrantless search: whether the area observed was within the constitutionally protected curtilage of a home, whether the flight altitude and vantage point exceeded what a reasonable person would expect the public to observe, and whether a recognized exception, such as consent or exigent circumstances, applied. Kansas residents concerned about a specific law-enforcement drone flight should not assume a state statutory warrant requirement exists the way it does in several other states; none currently does in Kansas.
Kansas's 2025 foreign-adversary drone procurement law and hunting rules
Kansas's most significant recent drone legislation has nothing to do with civilian privacy. House Substitute for Senate Bill 9, the Kansas Land and Military Installation Protection Act, was signed by the governor on April 7, 2025, and took effect July 1, 2025. Its drone provisions bar any Kansas governmental agency, state or local, from purchasing a drone, or related services, equipment, or software, whose critical components were produced in a country of concern, defined as China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or Venezuela, or by a foreign principal. Critical component reaches beyond the airframe to any software installed on the drone or on a supporting device or network. The same act separately restricts foreign-principal ownership of real property within 100 miles of a military installation in Kansas or an adjoining state, and requires existing foreign-owned holders to register with the Attorney General.
Separately, K.S.A. 32-1003 restricts the use of vehicles in hunting, though its text is narrower than it is usually described. Subsection (a)(1) makes it unlawful to take any game animal or furbearing animal from a motorboat, airplane, motor vehicle or other water, air or land vehicle, absent a valid handicapped hunting and fishing permit. Subsection (a)(2) separately bars providing or receiving information on the location of such an animal by radio or other mechanical device for purposes of taking it. The statute never uses the word wildlife, never mentions drones, and contains no prohibition on driving game, so the exposure for scouting deer with a drone comes from the mechanical-device clause in (a)(2) rather than the air-vehicle clause. It exists independent of any privacy law and sits alongside the federal Airborne Hunting Act, 16 U.S.C. section 742j-1.
Can I shoot down a drone over my Kansas property?
No. Federal law makes it a serious crime to damage or destroy any drone regardless of whose airspace it is in. 18 U.S.C. section 32, the Aircraft Sabotage Act, criminalizes willfully damaging an "aircraft," a category the FAA has applied to drones since 2012, and carries up to 20 years in federal prison. The FAA's position, stated since 2016, is that it controls the airspace above private land, not the landowner, so property ownership on the ground does not create a right to fire on what flies overhead.
Kansas law enforcement has echoed that warning directly. After a wave of drone sightings across Butler and Sedgwick counties left residents worried about privacy and break-ins, a forensic investigator with the Sedgwick County Sheriff's Office publicly cautioned that shooting down a drone is a very bad idea that will most likely lead to felony charges: criminal damage to property under Kansas law, and, within city limits, unlawful discharge of a firearm. Kansas has no statute authorizing a landowner to disable or shoot down a drone, and a favorable outcome in another state's case is not a legal shield in Kansas.
| Question | Kansas rule |
|---|---|
| Dedicated civilian drone privacy statute | None; drone surveillance is folded into the civil stalking definition, K.S.A. 60-31a02 |
| Remedy for drone harassment | Civil protection-from-stalking order under K.S.A. 60-31a02; criminal stalking is a separate statute, K.S.A. 21-5427, that does not name drones |
| Low-altitude flight over an animal facility or research crop area | Class A nonperson misdemeanor without the owner's consent, K.S.A. 47-1827 |
| Law enforcement drone warrant requirement | None by statute; governed by ordinary Fourth Amendment case law |
| Foreign-made government drones | Banned for state or local purchase since July 1, 2025 (2025 Sess. Laws ch. 68) |
| Drone for hunting or scouting game | Locating a game or furbearing animal by radio or other mechanical device for purposes of taking it is barred, K.S.A. 32-1003(a)(2) |
| Shooting down a drone | Federal felony regardless of location, 18 U.S.C. section 32; also state criminal damage or firearm charges |
Watch out: Because K.S.A. 60-31a02 requires a course of conduct, meaning two or more separate incidents, a single one-off drone overflight by a neighbor is unlikely to qualify for a stalking protection order by itself, even if it felt invasive.
More Kansas Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Kansas have a drone privacy law?
Not a standalone one. Kansas addresses drone surveillance through its Protection from Stalking Act, K.S.A. 60-31a02, which treats repeated drone use over or near a dwelling as harassment for purposes of a civil protection order.
Can I get a protection order against a neighbor who keeps flying a drone over my house in Kansas?
Potentially, yes, if the flights amount to a course of conduct, two or more incidents, under K.S.A. 60-31a02. A single flight is less likely to qualify on its own.
Can drone harassment be a crime in Kansas, not just a civil matter?
It can, but only through a separate statute. K.S.A. 60-31a02 is the civil definition that names unmanned aerial systems; criminal stalking under K.S.A. 21-5427 never mentions drones and has its own course-of-conduct list, so a drone case has to fit that general definition. A first conviction is generally a class A person misdemeanor; a second is a severity level 7 person felony for reckless stalking, level 5 for knowing stalking, and level 4 where a child was targeted.
Is it illegal to fly a drone low over a Kansas farm or research field?
It can be. K.S.A. 47-1827 makes it a class A nonperson misdemeanor to fly an aircraft in the airspace directly above an animal facility, or above the field crop production area of a research or product development program, below the 14 C.F.R. 91.119(c) minimum safe altitude without the owner's consent. Federal law counts a drone as an aircraft.
Does Kansas police need a warrant to fly a drone over my property?
Kansas has no statute requiring one. The analysis instead follows ordinary Fourth Amendment and state constitutional search-and-seizure case law rather than a drone-specific statutory floor.
Can Kansas cities or the state buy Chinese-made drones?
Not as of July 1, 2025. The Kansas Land and Military Installation Protection Act bars government purchase of drones with critical components sourced from China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or Venezuela.
Is it legal to use a drone to scout deer in Kansas?
No. K.S.A. 32-1003(a)(2) bars providing or receiving information on the location of a game animal or furbearing animal by radio or other mechanical device for purposes of taking it, which is where drone scouting runs into trouble; subsection (a)(1) separately bars taking such an animal from an air vehicle. The statute does not name drones, and the federal Airborne Hunting Act applies on top of it.
Is it legal to shoot down a drone flying over my Kansas property?
No. It is a federal felony under 18 U.S.C. section 32 regardless of the state, and Kansas law enforcement has warned it can also bring state criminal-damage and firearm-discharge charges.
What can I do if a drone keeps flying over my Kansas home?
Documenting each incident and its date matters, since K.S.A. 60-31a02 requires a course of conduct. Kansas residents facing a persistent pattern can look into a protection-from-stalking petition or report the pattern to local law enforcement.
Updates
Corrected the Kansas stalking discussion to separate the civil drone definition in K.S.A. 60-31a02 from the criminal stalking statute K.S.A. 21-5427, gave the full range of second-offense felony severity levels, narrowed the description of the hunting statute K.S.A. 32-1003 to its actual text, and added the low-altitude overflight offense in K.S.A. 47-1827.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 60: PROCEDURE, CIVIL
§ 60-31a02Definitions.In force
As used in the protection from stalking, sexual assault or human trafficking act: (a) "Human trafficking" means any act that would constitute human trafficking or aggravated human trafficking, as defined by K.S.A. 21-5426, and amendments thereto, or commercial sexual exploitation of a child, as defined by K.S.A. 21-6422, and amendments thereto, or an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute selling sexual relations, as defined by K.S.A. 21-6419, and amendments thereto. (b) "Human trafficking victim" means a person who has been subjected to an act that would constitute human trafficking or aggravated human trafficking, as defined by K.S.A. 21-5426, and amendments thereto, or commercial sexual exploitation of a child, as defined by K.S.A. 21-6422, and amendments thereto, or has committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute selling sexual relations, as defined by K.S.A. 21-6419, and amendments thereto. (c) "Sexual assault" means: (1) A nonconsensual sexual act; or (2) an attempted sexual act against another by force, threat of force, duress or when the person is incapable of giving consent.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 32: WILDLIFE, PARKS AND RECREATION
§ 32-1003Unlawful methods of taking wildlife; penalties.In force
(a) It is unlawful for any person, unless authorized by law or rules and regulations of the secretary, to: (1) Take any game animal or furbearing animal from a motorboat, airplane, motor vehicle or other water, air or land vehicle unless such person holds a valid handicapped hunting and fishing permit issued to such person pursuant to K.S.A. 32-931, and amendments thereto; (2) provide or receive information concerning the location of any game animal or furbearing animal by radio or other mechanical device for purposes of taking such bird or animal; (3) use sodium fluoroacetate, commonly called formula 1080, except as permitted by rules and regulations of the secretary; (4) use poison, poisonous gas, smoke or ferrets, or any smoke gun or other device for forcing smoke or any other asphyxiating or deadly gas or liquid into the holes, dens, runways or houses of wildlife, except as permitted by rules and regulations of the secretary; (5) fish by placing in or upon any lake, pond, river, creek, stream or any other water, bordering on or within the state of Kansas, any deleterious substance or fishberries; (6) place or explode any dynamite, giant powder, lime, nitroglycerine or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2007
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Vogt (Court of Appeals of Kansas 2002, 30 Kan. App. 2d 1138)“…ed of hunting deer with an artificial light in violation of K.S.A. 32-1003(g). Vogt and Graber appeal the trial co…”
- State v. McAFFRY (Supreme Court of Kansas 1997, 263 Kan. 521)“…The State appeals from the trial court’s decision holding K.S.A. 32-1003(g) is unconstitutionally overbroad. K.S…”
- Attorney General Opinion No. (Kansas Attorney General Reports 2007)“…The Hunting Laws The two hunting laws at issue here are K.S.A. 32-1003 (a)(7) (spotlighting statute) and K.A.R…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 18
§ 32Destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilitiesIn forcecited in 51 of our articles
Whoever willfully— sets fire to, damages, destroys, disables, or wrecks any aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States or any civil aircraft used, operated, or employed in interstate, overseas, or foreign air commerce; places or causes to be placed a destructive device or substance in, upon, or in proximity to, or otherwise makes or causes to be made unworkable or unusable or hazardous to work or use, any such aircraft, or any part or other materials used or intended to be used in connection with the operation of such aircraft, if such placing or causing to be placed or such making or causing to be made is likely to endanger the safety of any such aircraft; sets fire to, damages, destroys, or disables any air navigation facility, or interferes by force or violence with the operation of such facility, if such fire, damaging, destroying, disabling, or interfering is likely to endanger the safety of any such aircraft in flight; with the intent to damage, destroy, or disable any such aircraft, sets fire to, damages, destroys, or disables or places a destructive device or substance in, upon, or in proximity to, any appliance or structure, ramp, landing area,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 168 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States v. Yousef (2003) applied 18 U.S.C. 32 to an overseas airline bombing plot, holding Section 32(a) reaches conduct abroad because US-flag aircraft in flight are within the special aircraft jurisdiction, and that a defendant brought here involuntarily is still found in the United States under Section 32(b).
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Perez v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1971, 402 U.S. 146)“…commerce, as, for example, the destruction of an aircraft ( 18 U. S. C. § 32 ), or persons or things in commerce, as…”
- Stanford v. Kentucky (Supreme Court of the United States 1989, 492 U.S. 361)“…r by persons subject to Uniform Code of Military Justice); 18 U. S. C. §§ 32 , 33, and 34 (1982 ed. and Supp. V) (de…”
- United States v. Yousef (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2003, 327 F.3d 56)✓Yousef bombed a Philippine airliner and plotted to bomb twelve US flag airliners on Asian routes; the court held Section 32(a) reaches attacks on US flag aircraft worldwide, and that Yousef, brought here involuntarily, was found in the United States under Section 32(b).
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: California Drone Laws (2026): Privacy, Fires & Shoot-Down Rules, Oregon Drone Laws 2026: Police Warrants, Privacy & Penalties, Connecticut Drone Laws (2026): Privacy & Penalties
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- K.S.A. 60-31a02, Protection from Stalking Act, definitions (harassment, unmanned aerial system)(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 32-1003, unlawful methods of taking wildlife, penalties(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- Kansas Secretary of State, 2025 Session Laws of Kansas, Chapter 68 (House Substitute for Senate Bill 9), Kansas Land and Military Installation Protection Act(sos.ks.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. section 32, destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilities(law.cornell.edu)
- KSN News, drones allowed over your property, shooting them down can be a felony(ksn.com)
- KSN News, residents concerned after drones spotted in Butler, Sedgwick counties(ksn.com)
- K.S.A. 21-5427, stalking; course of conduct definition and severity-level penalties(ksrevisor.gov)
- K.S.A. 47-1827, unlawful acts at an animal facility or field crop production area, including low-altitude aircraft overflight(ksrevisor.gov)