Hawaii
Truck Accident Laws in Hawaii (2026): Deadlines & Liability
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 9 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

A collision with a large commercial truck in Hawaii is shaped by two bodies of law at once: Hawaii's own rules on deadlines, fault, and its no-fault auto-insurance system, and a detailed set of federal safety regulations that govern trucking companies and their drivers. Hawaii is unusual among the states covered here because it is a no-fault (PIP) state, which adds an extra step before you can sue for pain and suffering. This page explains both layers, as general legal information rather than legal advice.
The deadline to sue in Hawaii
For a crash involving a motor vehicle, including a commercial truck, the operative limitations provision is HRS 431:10C-315(b). It provides that no suit arising out of a motor vehicle accident may be brought in tort more than the later of two years after the date of the accident, two years after the date of the last payment of motor vehicle insurance or optional additional benefits, or two years after the date of the last payment of workers' compensation or public assistance benefits arising from the accident. That measure can run later than Hawaii's general personal-injury statute, HRS 657-7, which sets two years from the date the injury occurs or is discovered. A wrongful-death action under HRS 663-3 is likewise subject to a two-year limit, generally running from the date of death.
The period can also be tolled in limited circumstances, such as for an injured minor or a legally incapacitated person. Claims against state or county government carry their own notice requirements and shorter timelines, so those cases demand fast action. Whether a later trigger date is available turns on facts such as when your PIP or benefit payments actually stopped, so the safe practice is to work from two years after the crash rather than assume a longer window.
How fault works: Hawaii's 51% bar
Hawaii uses modified comparative negligence under HRS 663-31. Your recovery is reduced in proportion to your own share of fault, and you are barred only if your fault is greater than the combined fault of the parties you are suing. In practice this is the 51% bar: you can still recover if you are 50% at fault, but not if you are 51% or more at fault. A plaintiff who is 50% at fault recovers half of the damages; at 51% the claim is barred.
Hawaii law also addresses how fault is allocated among multiple defendants, which matters in a truck case where responsibility may be divided among the driver, the motor carrier, and others. Identifying each responsible party is important to a full recovery.
No-fault status: Hawaii is a no-fault (PIP) state
Hawaii is one of the no-fault auto states. Every vehicle owner must carry personal injury protection (PIP) coverage, and after a crash your own PIP pays your initial medical and rehabilitative expenses regardless of who was at fault. Hawaii sets a minimum PIP benefit of $10,000 per person under HRS 431:10C-103.5.

Because Hawaii is a no-fault state, HRS 431:10C-306 abolishes ordinary tort liability for bodily injury from a motor-vehicle accident unless you clear a statutory threshold. You may step outside the no-fault system and sue the at-fault driver and trucking company for pain and suffering and other tort damages when either:
- A monetary threshold is met: your PIP medical-rehabilitative benefits incurred reach or exceed the medical-rehabilitative limit, which is $5,000 under HRS 431:10C-306(b)(4); or
- A verbal (serious-injury) threshold is met: the injury results in death, significant permanent loss of use of a part or function of the body, or permanent and serious disfigurement that subjects the person to mental or emotional suffering.
The serious injuries typical of a collision with a heavy commercial truck usually clear one of these thresholds without difficulty, so most truck-injury victims can pursue a full tort claim. Property-damage claims are not subject to the no-fault bar and can be brought directly against the at-fault party.
Damage caps in Hawaii
Hawaii does not cap economic damages such as medical bills and lost income. It does have a $375,000 limit on pain-and-suffering damages under HRS 663-8.7, but that limit does not reach a truck-crash claim. HRS 663-8.7 states that the limitation does not apply to tort actions enumerated in HRS 663-10.9(2), and HRS 663-10.9(2)(F) enumerates torts relating to motor vehicle accidents. A truck-accident tort action is a motor-vehicle tort, so the $375,000 pain-and-suffering cap does not apply to it.
The one carve-out sits in HRS 663-10.9(4), which covers motor-vehicle claims concerning the maintenance and design of highways, including guardrails, utility poles, and street and directional signs. Those claims fall outside paragraph (2), so the $375,000 limit can apply to that narrow category.
Insurance context in Hawaii
Hawaii requires drivers to carry PIP coverage plus liability insurance. Effective January 1, 2026, Hawaii increased its minimum liability limits to $40,000 per person and $80,000 per accident for bodily injury, plus $20,000 for property damage (up from the long-standing 20/40/10 figures), under HRS 431:10C-301. Whatever the minimum, a commercial truck operating in interstate commerce is subject to the much higher federal financial-responsibility rules discussed below, which is one reason trucking cases differ from ordinary car crashes. Drivers should confirm current minimums with the Hawaii Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs Insurance Division.
Federal FMCSA rules that apply to trucking companies
Most large commercial trucks and the companies that operate them are regulated by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) under Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. These rules set the safety baseline, and a violation can be strong evidence of negligence:

- Hours of service (49 CFR Part 395): a property-carrying driver may drive no more than 11 hours after 10 consecutive hours off duty, cannot drive beyond the 14th hour after coming on duty, must take a 30-minute break after 8 hours of driving, and is capped at 60 hours in 7 days or 70 hours in 8 days.
- Electronic logging devices (49 CFR Part 395): most drivers must record their hours with an ELD, and carriers must retain the data, which can confirm or contradict a fatigue defense.
- Driver qualification and CDL (49 CFR Part 391): carriers must verify a driver's license, medical fitness, and record before putting them on the road.
- Drug and alcohol testing (49 CFR Part 382): carriers must conduct pre-employment, random, and post-accident testing and use the FMCSA Clearinghouse.
- Inspection, repair, and maintenance (49 CFR Part 396): carriers must systematically inspect and maintain their vehicles and keep records.
Who can be liable after a truck crash
A truck case routinely involves more potential defendants than a typical car crash, and many are corporate. Depending on the facts, responsibility may extend to:
- The driver, for negligent driving such as speeding, distraction, or fatigue.
- The motor carrier (trucking company), often vicariously for its driver's on-the-job conduct, and directly for negligent hiring, training, supervision, or retention, or for pressuring drivers past the hours-of-service limits.
- A broker or shipper, in some circumstances.
- A cargo loader, when improper or overweight loading causes or worsens a crash.
- A parts or vehicle manufacturer, when a defective brake, tire, or component contributes.
Identifying every responsible party matters because additional defendants can mean additional insurance coverage available to compensate serious injuries.
Federal minimum insurance for trucks
Under 49 CFR 387.9, a for-hire motor carrier transporting non-hazardous general freight in interstate commerce must maintain at least $750,000 in liability insurance. Carriers hauling certain hazardous materials must carry far more, up to $5,000,000. That $750,000 baseline, set by the Motor Carrier Act of 1980, dwarfs Hawaii's personal-auto minimums and is a major reason truck cases are handled differently from car-accident claims.
Why evidence preservation matters early
Much of the proof in a truck case lives in the truck and the carrier's files: ELD and logbook records, the engine control module (the truck's onboard data recorder or black box), maintenance and inspection logs, dispatch records, and the post-accident drug-and-alcohol test. Some of that data can be overwritten or routinely discarded within months. A timely spoliation or evidence-preservation letter to the carrier, sent early, helps ensure this information is kept rather than lost.

How to evaluate a Hawaii truck-accident claim
If you have been injured, preserve what you can: the police report, photographs of the scene and vehicles, the names of witnesses, and your medical records. Get medical care and keep documentation of your treatment and lost income, which also matters for the no-fault PIP threshold. Many Hawaii personal-injury attorneys evaluate truck cases on a contingency-fee basis and offer a free initial consultation, meaning no upfront fee, though no lawyer can guarantee a result. Because the filing deadline is short and evidence can disappear, it is wise to consult a licensed Hawaii attorney promptly.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the deadline to sue for a truck accident in Hawaii?
For a motor-vehicle crash, HRS 431:10C-315(b) controls: no tort suit may be brought more than the later of two years after the accident, two years after the last payment of motor vehicle insurance or optional additional benefits, or two years after the last payment of workers' compensation or public assistance benefits arising from the accident. Hawaii's general personal-injury deadline is two years under HRS 657-7, and a wrongful-death claim is two years from the date of death under HRS 663-3. Government claims have their own notice rules, and the period can be tolled in limited situations.
Who can be sued after a truck accident in Hawaii?
Potentially the driver, the motor carrier (often vicariously and for negligent hiring, training, or supervision), a broker or shipper, a cargo loader, and a parts or vehicle manufacturer. Truck cases routinely involve multiple, often corporate, defendants.
How is a truck accident different from a car accident?
Commercial trucks are governed by federal FMCSA safety rules (49 CFR) on hours of service, logging, driver qualification, and maintenance; cases often involve several defendants; key evidence such as ELD and engine-control-module data can be overwritten; and interstate carriers must carry at least $750,000 in liability coverage rather than a typical car policy.
Is Hawaii a no-fault state, and can I still sue after a truck accident?
Yes, Hawaii is a no-fault (PIP) state. Your own PIP pays initial medical bills regardless of fault, and under HRS 431:10C-306 you can sue the at-fault party for pain and suffering once you clear a threshold: PIP medical benefits reaching $5,000, or death, significant permanent loss of use, or permanent serious disfigurement. Serious truck-crash injuries usually clear this.
How does fault affect my recovery in Hawaii?
Under Hawaii's modified comparative negligence rule (HRS 663-31), your damages are reduced by your percentage of fault, and you are barred from recovery only if your fault exceeds 50%. In practice this is a 51% bar: a plaintiff who is 50% at fault can still recover half of the damages.
How much is a Hawaii truck accident case worth?
There is no set figure. Value depends on the severity of injuries, medical costs, lost income, the degree of fault, and available insurance. Hawaii does not cap economic damages, and its $375,000 pain-and-suffering limit under HRS 663-8.7 does not apply to motor-vehicle tort actions, which HRS 663-10.9(2)(F) excepts from that limit, so it does not cap a truck-crash claim. No one can guarantee an outcome or amount.
Injured in Hawaii? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Hawaii personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Corrected two statutory points: Hawaii's $375,000 pain-and-suffering cap does not apply to motor-vehicle tort actions such as truck crashes, and the tort filing deadline for a motor-vehicle crash runs under HRS 431:10C-315(b), which can fall later than the general two-year personal-injury limit.
Repointed the tort-threshold citation to the current statute section and fixed two broken statute links.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 663: TORT ACTIONS
§ 663-31Contributory negligence no bar; comparative negligence; findings of fact and special verdictsIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
(a) Contributory negligence shall not bar recovery in any action by any person or the person's legal representative to recover damages for negligence resulting in death or in injury to person or property, if such negligence was not greater than the negligence of the person or in the case of more than one person, the aggregate negligence of such persons against whom recovery is sought, but any damages allowed shall be diminished in proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to the person for whose injury, damage or death recovery is made. (b) In any action to which subsection (a) of this section applies, the court, in a nonjury trial, shall make findings of fact or, in a jury trial, the jury shall return a special verdict which shall state: (1) The amount of the damages which would have been recoverable if there had been no contributory negligence; and (2) The degree of negligence of each party, expressed as a percentage.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 48 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kealoha v. County of Hawaii (Hawaii Supreme Court 1993, 74 Haw. 308)“…ages. Judgment was entered in favor of Kealoha, pursuant to HRS § 663-31, in the amount of $21,250. Having preva…”
- Dorrance v. Lee (Hawaii Supreme Court 1999, 90 Haw. 143)“…d Dorrance’s negligence to be larger than Lee’s negligence, HRS § 663-31 (governing contributory negligence),…”
- Mist v. Westin Hotels, Inc. (Hawaii Supreme Court 1987, 69 Haw. 192)“…See 21 A.L.R.3d 469 (1968). Under HRS § 663-31, contributory negligence is no longer a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Hawaii Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Hawaii Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do, Hawaii Car Accident Laws: No-Fault, PIP, and Your Claim
§ 663-3Death by wrongful actIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) When the death of a person is caused by the wrongful act, neglect, or default of any person, the deceased's legal representative, or any of the persons enumerated in subsection (b), may maintain an action against the person causing the death or against the person responsible for the death. The action shall be maintained on behalf of the persons enumerated in subsection (b), except that the legal representative may recover on behalf of the estate the reasonable expenses of the deceased's last illness and burial.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 56 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Masaki v. General Motors Corp. (Hawaii Supreme Court 1989, 71 Haw. 1)“…oreover, we note that in wrongful death actions pursuant to HRS § 663-3, no arbitrary age limit is placed upon…”
- Bertelmann v. Taas Associates (Hawaii Supreme Court 1987, 69 Haw. 95)“…independent cause of action for wrongful death pursuant to HRS § 663-3 (1985). 4 This point, howe…”
- Hun v. Center Properties (Hawaii Supreme Court 1981, 63 Haw. 273)“…Yamasaki where the two-year limitations period set forth in HRS § 663-3 bars appellants’ claim. This Cou…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Medical Malpractice Laws in Hawaii (2026): Deadlines & Caps, Hawaii Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type, Hawaii Wrongful Death Laws (2026): Deadlines & Who Can Sue
§ 663-8.7Limitation on pain and sufferingIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Damages recoverable for pain and suffering as defined in section 663-8.5 shall be limited to a maximum award of $375,000; provided that this limitation shall not apply to tort actions enumerated in section 663-10.9(2). [L Sp 1986, c 2, §20; am L 1989, c 300, §2; am L 1991, c 62, §1; am L 1993, c 238, §1; am L 1995, c 130, §1]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2011
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ray v. KAPIOLANI MEDICAL SPECIALISTS (Hawaii Supreme Court 2011, 125 Haw. 253)“…g damages from $2 million to $375,000 “in accordance with” HRS § 663-8.7 (1993). The court denied KM…”
- Castaneda Ex Rel. Estate of Castaneda v. United States (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2008, 546 F.3d 682)“…million, Ind.Code § 34 — 18—14—3(a); see also Haw.Rev.Stat. § 663-8.7 ($375,000); Fla. Stat. § 766.118 (2) (…”
- Castaneda v. Henneford (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2008)“…(b), to $1.25 million, Ind. Code § 34-18-14- 3(a); see also Haw. Rev. Stat. § 663-8.7 ($375,000); Fla. Stat. § 766.118(2) ($5…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 657: LIMITATION OF ACTIONS
§ 657-7Damage to persons or propertyIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
Actions for the recovery of compensation for damage or injury to persons or property shall be instituted within two years after the cause of action accrued, and not after, except as provided in section 657-13. [L 1907, c 113, §1; am L 1913, c 19, §1; RL 1925, §2645; RL 1935, §3916; RL 1945, §10427; RL 1955, §241-7; am L 1957, c 138, §1; HRS §657-7; am L 1972, c 105, §1(e)]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 161 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Pele Defense Fund v. Paty (Hawaii Supreme Court 1992, 73 Haw. 578)“…hold that the two-year statute of limitations set forth in HRS § 657-7 governs § 1983 actions, 11…”
- Au v. Au (Hawaii Supreme Court 1981, 63 Haw. 263)“…was never briefed or discussed previously. They argue that HRS § 657-7 encompasses and applies to the kinds of…”
- Larsen v. Pacesetter Systems, Inc. (Hawaii Supreme Court 1992, 74 Haw. 1)“…ns is the two year period for personal injury actions under HRS § 657-7 (1985), and argues that plaintiff has f…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Motorcycle Accident Laws in Hawaii (2026): Deadlines & Helmets, Hawaii Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability
Code of Federal Regulations Title 49
§ 387.9Financial responsibility, minimum levels.In forcecited in 52 of our articles
The minimum levels of financial responsibility referred to in § 387.7 are hereby prescribed as follows: Table 1 to § 387.9—Schedule of Limits—Public Liability Type of carriage Commodity transported January 1, 1985 (1) For-hire (In interstate or foreign commerce, with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Property (nonhazardous) $750,000 (2) For-hire and Private (In interstate, foreign, or intrastate commerce, with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Hazardous substances, as defined in 49 CFR 171.8, transported in bulk in cargo tanks, portable tanks, or hopper-type vehicles; in bulk Division 1.1, 1.2 or 1.3 materials; in bulk Division 2.3, Hazard Zone A material; in bulk Division 6.1, Packing Group I, Hazard Zone A material, in bulk Division 2.1 or 2.2 material; or highway route controlled quantities of a Class 7 material, as defined in 49 CFR 173.403 5,000,000 (3) For-hire and Private (In interstate or foreign commerce, in any quantity; or in intrastate commerce, in bulk only; with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Oil listed in 49 CFR 172.101; hazardous waste, hazardous materials, or hazardous substances defined in 49…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 45 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Yeates (2009) held an MCS-90 endorsement applies only where the underlying policy gives no coverage and the carrier's insurance falls below the minimums 49 CFR 387.9 prescribes. GREAT WEST CAS. v. General Cas. Co. of Wisconsin (2010) found that purpose met once other coverage exceeded the 387.9 amount.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- GREAT WEST CAS. v. General Cas. Co. of Wisconsin (District Court, D. Minnesota 2010, 734 F. Supp. 2d 718)“…ardous commodities is $750,000. 49 U.S.C. § 31139 (b)(2); 49 C.F.R. § 387.9 . Under the Federal Motor Carrie…”
- Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Yeates (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2009, 584 F.3d 868)✓A trucker's own insurer paid the Yeateses the full $750,000 that section 387.9 sets as the minimum for non-hazardous property, and the en banc court held a second insurer's MCS-90 endorsement was therefore never triggered and added no coverage.
- American Inter-Fidelity Exchange v. American Re-Insurance Company (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 1994, 17 F.3d 1018)✓A truck insurer sought reinsurance for $846,256 in deductibles it paid accident victims but could not collect; the court read the mandatory endorsement to require insurers to cover victims from the first dollar up to section 387.9's minimums, and reversed the dismissal.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Truck Accident Laws in Connecticut (2026): Deadlines & Liability, Truck Accident Laws in Alabama (2026): Deadlines & Liability, Truck Accident Laws in Iowa (2026): Deadlines & Liability
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- HRS 657-7 (two-year limitation for personal-injury actions)(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- HRS 663-3 (wrongful death action)(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- HRS 663-31 (modified comparative negligence; recovery barred when fault is greater than defendants')(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- HRS 431:10C-306 (abolition of tort liability; no-fault threshold to sue)(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- HRS 431:10C-306(b)(4) (tort-liability monetary threshold: PIP benefits of $5,000 or more)(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- HRS 663-8.7 (limitation on pain and suffering; $375,000 cap)(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- 49 CFR 387.9 (minimum levels of financial responsibility for motor carriers; $750,000 general freight)(ecfr.gov).gov
- 49 CFR Part 395 (hours of service of drivers; ELD requirements)(ecfr.gov).gov
- FMCSA, Hours of Service of Drivers(fmcsa.dot.gov).gov
- HRS 663-10.9 (abolition of joint and several liability; exceptions, including (2)(F) torts relating to motor vehicle accidents)(capitol.hawaii.gov)
- HRS 431:10C-315 (statute of limitations; (b) motor-vehicle tort suits, later of accident date or last benefit payment)(capitol.hawaii.gov)