Hawaii
Hawaii Wrongful Death Laws (2026): Deadlines & Who Can Sue
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

When a person in Hawaii dies because of another party's wrongful act, neglect, or default, Hawaii law lets the family and the estate seek compensation. The core rule is Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-3, which lists who may sue and the human losses they may recover, and a separate survival statute keeps the deceased person's own claim alive. This guide explains how Hawaii wrongful death claims work in plain terms. It is general information and attorney advertising, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The deadline to file in Hawaii
The statute of limitations for a Hawaii wrongful death claim is generally two years, measured from the date of the person's death, under Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-3. Hawaii's general two-year limit for personal injury actions points to the same period for the related claims. Because filing late almost always bars the claim, this deadline is the first thing to confirm.
The period can be paused in limited situations, for example while a surviving child is a minor. Claims against a government defendant follow their own statutes, but in Hawaii those periods are not shorter than the general two-year window. A tort claim against the State is barred unless the action is begun within two years after the claim accrues under Hawaii Revised Statutes 662-4, and before a county can be held liable, written notice of the injuries and the damages claimed must be given within two years after the injuries accrued under Hawaii Revised Statutes 46-72. The county notice is an extra step rather than a shorter clock, so it is still worth handling early. These rules are fact-specific, so the safest course is to confirm the exact date with a licensed attorney early.
Who can file a wrongful death claim
Hawaii is more flexible than many states about who brings the claim. Under Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-3, the action may be maintained by the deceased person's legal representative or by any of the listed beneficiaries directly. The statute names the surviving spouse, the reciprocal beneficiary, the children, the father and mother, and any person who was wholly or partly dependent on the deceased.
Because Hawaii recognizes reciprocal beneficiaries and dependents, the group of people who can recover is broader than the spouse-and-children model used in some states. When more than one person has a claim, the court allocates the recovery among them according to their losses, so the practical question is often not only who may sue but how the proceeds are shared.
Wrongful death versus a survival action
Hawaii allows two distinct claims after a death. The wrongful death claim under Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-3 compensates the survivors for their own losses, such as lost support and the loss of the relationship. The survival action under Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-7 is different: it continues the claim the deceased person could have brought had they lived, and any recovery belongs to the estate.

The survival action typically covers the deceased person's pre-death losses, including conscious pain and suffering, lost earnings before death, and medical expenses from the final injury. Pursuing both claims together can significantly affect the total recovery, because the survivors' losses and the deceased person's own losses are compensated separately. The survival action is brought by the legal representative of the estate.
Damages that can be recovered
Hawaii is notably generous in the human losses it recognizes. Under Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-3, survivors may recover the loss of society, companionship, comfort, consortium, or protection; the loss of marital care, attention, advice, or counsel; the loss of a reciprocal beneficiary's care and counsel; the loss of filial care or attention; and the loss of parental care, training, guidance, or education. The statute frames these as the general loss of love and affection suffered by the survivors.
Alongside those relational losses, survivors may recover financial losses such as lost support and services and the funeral and burial expenses. Through the separate survival action, the estate may recover the deceased person's own pre-death pain and suffering, lost earnings, and medical costs. Together, the two claims cover both the survivors' losses and the deceased person's losses.
Damage caps and punitive damages
Hawaii does not cap economic damages such as lost support, and it does not cap the relational loss-of-society damages that are central to most wrongful death claims. It does, however, cap pain-and-suffering damages at 375,000 dollars under Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-8.7. That cap is narrow: it limits only the defined category of pain and suffering tied to physical injury, not the broader non-economic losses like loss of society and companionship, and the statute lists exceptions where the cap does not apply.
Punitive damages, which punish especially egregious conduct, are generally not recoverable in the wrongful death claim itself, but they can be pursued through the survival action because the deceased person could have sought them. Hawaii requires clear and convincing evidence to support a punitive award and does not impose a fixed statutory dollar cap on the amount.
Common situations that lead to a Hawaii claim
Wrongful death claims in Hawaii arise from many kinds of preventable death, including motor vehicle and pedestrian crashes, drownings and ocean or recreation incidents, defective products, unsafe premises, workplace accidents, and medical negligence. The cause of death shapes who the responsible parties are and what evidence the claim turns on, but the core questions are the same in every case: who has standing to sue, by when, and for what losses. Deaths that may also involve a criminal case, such as a fatal impaired-driving crash, can still support a civil wrongful death claim, which proceeds independently of any criminal prosecution and uses a lower burden of proof.

How fault affects the claim
Hawaii follows a modified comparative negligence rule under Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-31. If the deceased person was partly at fault for the event that caused the death, the recovery is reduced in proportion to that share of fault. Recovery is barred only if the deceased person's fault was greater than the combined fault of the parties being sued, so a claim can still proceed even where fault is shared equally.
How proceeds are distributed
Because Hawaii lets multiple beneficiaries recover, the court divides a wrongful death recovery among the survivors according to the losses each one proved, rather than by a fixed statutory share. The separate survival recovery belongs to the estate and is distributed through probate under the deceased person's will or, if there is none, under Hawaii's intestacy rules, and it can be reached by the estate's creditors. Keeping the two recoveries distinct matters because they are paid to different parties.
How to move forward
The filing deadline does not pause for grief, so the practical steps are to preserve records (the death certificate, medical and accident records, and proof of the deceased person's earnings and the family's losses), to identify who has standing among the spouse, reciprocal beneficiary, children, parents, and dependents, and to consider whether an estate representative is needed for a survival action. Speaking with a licensed Hawaii attorney promptly matters because of the two-year deadline. Most wrongful death attorneys offer a free consultation and work on a contingency basis, meaning no upfront fee and payment only out of any recovery. No outcome can be promised, and this article is information, not legal advice.

Frequently Asked Questions
What is the deadline to file a wrongful death claim in Hawaii?
Generally two years from the date of death under Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-3, matching Hawaii's two-year limit for personal injury actions. The period can be paused in limited situations, such as while a surviving child is a minor. Claims against the State or a county are not on a shorter clock: Hawaii Revised Statutes 662-4 gives two years to begin a tort action against the State, and Hawaii Revised Statutes 46-72 requires written notice to the county within two years after the injuries accrued before the county can be held liable. Confirm the exact date with a Hawaii attorney.
Who can file a wrongful death lawsuit in Hawaii?
Under Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-3, the deceased person's legal representative or the listed beneficiaries may sue: the surviving spouse, the reciprocal beneficiary, the children, the parents, and anyone who was wholly or partly dependent on the deceased. This is broader than the spouse-and-children model used in many states.
What damages can be recovered in a Hawaii wrongful death case?
Survivors may recover loss of society, companionship, comfort, consortium, and the loss of love and affection, plus lost support and funeral expenses, under Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-3. A separate survival action under Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-7 recovers the deceased person's own pre-death pain and suffering, lost earnings, and medical costs for the estate.
Is there a cap on wrongful death damages in Hawaii?
Hawaii caps pain-and-suffering damages at 375,000 dollars under Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-8.7, but that cap reaches only the defined category of pain and suffering tied to physical injury, not the loss-of-society and companionship damages central to most wrongful death claims, and the statute lists exceptions. Economic damages are not capped.
Injured in Hawaii? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Hawaii personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Corrected the claim that government wrongful death claims in Hawaii carry shorter notice deadlines: claims against the State (HRS 662-4) and against a county (HRS 46-72) both run two years, and the county requires written notice within that same period.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 663: TORT ACTIONS
§ 663-3Death by wrongful actIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) When the death of a person is caused by the wrongful act, neglect, or default of any person, the deceased's legal representative, or any of the persons enumerated in subsection (b), may maintain an action against the person causing the death or against the person responsible for the death. The action shall be maintained on behalf of the persons enumerated in subsection (b), except that the legal representative may recover on behalf of the estate the reasonable expenses of the deceased's last illness and burial.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 56 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Masaki v. General Motors Corp. (Hawaii Supreme Court 1989, 71 Haw. 1)“…oreover, we note that in wrongful death actions pursuant to HRS § 663-3, no arbitrary age limit is placed upon…”
- Bertelmann v. Taas Associates (Hawaii Supreme Court 1987, 69 Haw. 95)“…independent cause of action for wrongful death pursuant to HRS § 663-3 (1985). 4 This point, howe…”
- Hun v. Center Properties (Hawaii Supreme Court 1981, 63 Haw. 273)“…Yamasaki where the two-year limitations period set forth in HRS § 663-3 bars appellants’ claim. This Cou…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Medical Malpractice Laws in Hawaii (2026): Deadlines & Caps, Hawaii Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type, Truck Accident Laws in Hawaii (2026): Deadlines & Liability
§ 663-7Survival of cause of actionIn force
A cause of action arising out of a wrongful act, neglect, or default, except a cause of action for defamation or malicious prosecution, shall not be extinguished by reason of the death of the injured person. The cause of action shall survive in favor of the legal representative of the person and any damages recovered shall form part of the estate of the deceased. [L 1955, c 205, §2; RL 1955, §246-6; HRS §663-7; am L 1972, c 144, §2(f)]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 21 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Roxas v. Marcos (Hawaii Supreme Court 1998, 89 Haw. 91)“…Bagalay , this court construed the former version of HRS § 663-7 (1955), which allowed survival of actio…”
- Greene v. Texeira (Hawaii Supreme Court 1973, 54 Haw. 231)“…th Act, HRS § 663-3, and $5,000 under the Survival Statute, HRS § 663-7. Judgment was entered in accordance wit…”
- Castro v. Melchor. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2018, 142 Haw. 1)“…governs recovery by the decedent’s survivors[,]” and that HRS § 663-7,4 the survival statute, “governs recov…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 663-8.7Limitation on pain and sufferingIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Damages recoverable for pain and suffering as defined in section 663-8.5 shall be limited to a maximum award of $375,000; provided that this limitation shall not apply to tort actions enumerated in section 663-10.9(2). [L Sp 1986, c 2, §20; am L 1989, c 300, §2; am L 1991, c 62, §1; am L 1993, c 238, §1; am L 1995, c 130, §1]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2011
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ray v. KAPIOLANI MEDICAL SPECIALISTS (Hawaii Supreme Court 2011, 125 Haw. 253)“…g damages from $2 million to $375,000 “in accordance with” HRS § 663-8.7 (1993). The court denied KM…”
- Castaneda Ex Rel. Estate of Castaneda v. United States (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2008, 546 F.3d 682)“…million, Ind.Code § 34 — 18—14—3(a); see also Haw.Rev.Stat. § 663-8.7 ($375,000); Fla. Stat. § 766.118 (2) (…”
- Castaneda v. Henneford (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2008)“…(b), to $1.25 million, Ind. Code § 34-18-14- 3(a); see also Haw. Rev. Stat. § 663-8.7 ($375,000); Fla. Stat. § 766.118(2) ($5…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 663-31Contributory negligence no bar; comparative negligence; findings of fact and special verdictsIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
(a) Contributory negligence shall not bar recovery in any action by any person or the person's legal representative to recover damages for negligence resulting in death or in injury to person or property, if such negligence was not greater than the negligence of the person or in the case of more than one person, the aggregate negligence of such persons against whom recovery is sought, but any damages allowed shall be diminished in proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to the person for whose injury, damage or death recovery is made. (b) In any action to which subsection (a) of this section applies, the court, in a nonjury trial, shall make findings of fact or, in a jury trial, the jury shall return a special verdict which shall state: (1) The amount of the damages which would have been recoverable if there had been no contributory negligence; and (2) The degree of negligence of each party, expressed as a percentage.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 48 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kealoha v. County of Hawaii (Hawaii Supreme Court 1993, 74 Haw. 308)“…ages. Judgment was entered in favor of Kealoha, pursuant to HRS § 663-31, in the amount of $21,250. Having preva…”
- Dorrance v. Lee (Hawaii Supreme Court 1999, 90 Haw. 143)“…d Dorrance’s negligence to be larger than Lee’s negligence, HRS § 663-31 (governing contributory negligence),…”
- Mist v. Westin Hotels, Inc. (Hawaii Supreme Court 1987, 69 Haw. 192)“…See 21 A.L.R.3d 469 (1968). Under HRS § 663-31, contributory negligence is no longer a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Hawaii Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Hawaii Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do, Hawaii Car Accident Laws: No-Fault, PIP, and Your Claim
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-3, death by wrongful act(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-7, survival of cause of action(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-8.7, limitation on pain and suffering(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-31, comparative negligence(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii State Judiciary self-help and legal resources(courts.state.hi.us).gov
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 662-4, statute of limitations for tort claims against the State(capitol.hawaii.gov)
- Hawaii Revised Statutes 46-72, county liability for injuries and the written notice requirement(capitol.hawaii.gov)