Connecticut
Connecticut Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 7, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content
Connecticut permits surveillance cameras on private property but governs their use through several overlapping statutes. Employers must provide prior written notice under CGS 31-48d, phone-call audio requires all-party consent under CGS 52-570d, and cameras must never record areas where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Connecticut does not have a single comprehensive surveillance camera law. Instead, the state regulates surveillance through a combination of workplace monitoring statutes, wiretapping and eavesdropping laws, voyeurism protections, and common law privacy principles.
Understanding these overlapping laws is essential whether you are a homeowner installing security cameras, an employer monitoring your workplace, or a tenant concerned about your landlord's cameras. This guide breaks down every relevant Connecticut statute and explains how surveillance camera laws apply in specific situations.
Workplace Surveillance: CGS 31-48d
Connecticut is one of only a few states that specifically requires employers to notify employees before engaging in electronic monitoring. CGS 31-48d sets clear rules for workplace surveillance cameras and other forms of electronic monitoring.
Written Notice Requirements
Under this statute, an employer who engages in any type of electronic monitoring must provide prior written notice to all employees who may be affected. The notice must inform employees of the specific types of monitoring that may occur.
Employers must also post a notice in a conspicuous place that is readily available for employee viewing. This posted notice satisfies the written notice requirement. The statute defines "electronic monitoring" broadly to include the collection of information on an employer's premises concerning employees' activities or communications by any means other than direct observation. This includes the use of computers, telephones, cameras, and photo-optical systems.
The definition is not unlimited. CGS 31-48d(a)(3) expressly excludes from "electronic monitoring" the collection of information (A) for security purposes in common areas of the employer's premises which are held out for use by the public, and (B) which is prohibited under state or federal law. A security camera covering a public-facing sales floor, a lobby, or a building entrance therefore falls outside the statute entirely, and no notice is owed for it. The notice duty attaches to monitoring of work areas that are not held out for public use.
Exception for Misconduct Investigations
Connecticut law provides one important exception to the notice requirement. An employer may conduct electronic monitoring without prior notice when the employer has reasonable grounds to believe employees are engaged in conduct that:
- Violates the law
- Violates the legal rights of the employer or other employees
- Creates a hostile workplace environment
The monitoring must be reasonably likely to produce evidence of the suspected misconduct.
A criminal investigation is treated separately and more broadly. CGS 31-48d(d) provides that the provisions of the section do not apply to a criminal investigation at all, so the notice requirement is switched off rather than merely excused. The same subsection allows information obtained through electronic monitoring in the course of a criminal investigation to be used in a disciplinary proceeding against an employee.
Civil Penalties for Employers
The Connecticut Labor Commissioner enforces CGS 31-48d and may levy civil penalties against employers who violate the notice requirement. The penalty structure is:
- First offense: Up to $500
- Second offense: Up to $1,000
- Third and subsequent offenses: Up to $3,000 each
There is no private cause of action under this statute. Employees who believe their employer has violated the notice requirement must file a complaint with the Labor Commissioner rather than filing a lawsuit directly.
Workplace Surveillance Restrictions: CGS 31-48b
A separate statute, CGS 31-48b, places hard limits on where employers may install surveillance cameras and other monitoring equipment.
Prohibited Surveillance Areas
It is illegal for employers to operate any electronic surveillance device to monitor employees in areas designed for employees' health, personal comfort, or safeguarding of their possessions. These protected areas include:
- Restrooms and bathrooms
- Locker rooms
- Employee lounges and break rooms
- Changing areas
Recording Employment Negotiations
CGS 31-48b also prohibits employers, employees, and their agents from intentionally overhearing or recording employment contract negotiations. This applies to both audio and video recording of these discussions.
Criminal Penalties Under CGS 31-48b
Unlike the civil penalties in CGS 31-48d, violations of CGS 31-48b carry criminal consequences:
- Surveillance in private areas: $500 fine for a first offense, $1,000 fine for a second offense, and 30 days imprisonment for a third offense
- Recording employment negotiations: Up to one year imprisonment, a $1,000 fine, or both
Dressing Rooms: CGS 53-41a
Connecticut has one statute whose caption is literally about surveillance devices. CGS 53-41a provides that no department or clothing store shall install or in any manner use a closed-circuit television system, a two-way mirror, a peephole or any other surveillance device, including any mechanical device, in any dressing room available to the public.
The prohibition is flat. The statute contains no notice exception and no consent exception, so a retailer cannot cure a dressing-room camera by posting a sign or by asking shoppers to agree to it.
Its reach is narrow, which is why it does not displace the other statutes on this page. It speaks to department and clothing stores and to dressing rooms available to the public. Fitting or changing areas in a gym, a medical office, or a workplace are not covered by this section, and cameras there are judged under the workplace statutes above and the voyeurism statute below.
Anyone convicted of violating CGS 53-41a shall be fined not more than five hundred dollars or imprisoned not more than three months, or both.
Audio Recording Consent Requirements
Connecticut has a split approach to audio recording consent that directly affects surveillance cameras equipped with microphones.
Phone Calls: All-Party Consent
Under CGS 52-570d, Connecticut requires the consent of all parties before recording a private telephone conversation. There are three acceptable ways to obtain consent:
- Written or recorded consent obtained at the start of the recording from all parties
- Verbal notification recorded at the beginning of and as part of the communication by the recording party
- Automatic tone warning device that produces a distinct signal repeated at intervals of approximately fifteen seconds during the call
Anyone who records a phone call without proper consent may face civil liability. The person whose call was illegally recorded can sue for damages.
In-Person Conversations: One-Party Consent
Connecticut's criminal eavesdropping statute, CGS 53a-189, defines illegal wiretapping as recording or overhearing a communication without the consent of either the sender or receiver. This effectively makes Connecticut a one-party consent state for in-person conversations.
If you are a participant in a face-to-face conversation, you may record it without telling the other person. However, you cannot secretly record a conversation between two other people without either person's knowledge.
Eavesdropping Penalties
Eavesdropping under CGS 53a-189 is a Class D felony. Penalties include:
- Up to 5 years in prison
- Up to $5,000 in fines
- Or both
Tampering with private communications under CGS 53a-188 is a Class A misdemeanor, carrying up to one year imprisonment, a $2,000 fine, or both.
What This Means for Surveillance Cameras
If your home or business surveillance camera records audio, the consent requirements apply. A security camera that captures video only does not trigger wiretapping or eavesdropping laws. However, once you add a microphone, you must consider whether the people being recorded have consented to audio recording.
For cameras in your own home recording conversations you participate in, one-party consent applies. For cameras recording phone calls or conversations you are not part of, all-party consent rules apply.
Home Security Cameras
Connecticut does not prohibit homeowners from installing surveillance cameras on their own property. You are generally free to place cameras around your home, including on your front porch, driveway, garage, and other exterior areas.
Where You Can Place Home Cameras
You may install cameras in the following areas without legal concern:
- Front door and entryway areas: These are in plain view and carry no reasonable expectation of privacy
- Driveways and garages: Visible from public areas, these locations are generally permissible
- Living rooms and common areas: Inside your own home, you may record shared spaces
- Backyard areas visible from neighboring properties: If your yard is open and not enclosed, it may be considered in plain view
Where You Cannot Place Home Cameras
Even in your own home, certain placements violate Connecticut law:
- Bathrooms: Recording in bathrooms violates privacy expectations
- Guest bedrooms where visitors are staying and have a reasonable expectation of privacy
- Any location aimed at recording inside a neighbor's home where occupants have a reasonable expectation of privacy
Audio Recording Considerations
If your home security camera has audio recording capabilities, remember that Connecticut's consent rules apply. Cameras pointed at your front porch that capture conversations between visitors may implicate the eavesdropping statute if you are not a party to those conversations.
Hidden Cameras and Voyeurism: CGS 53a-189a
Connecticut's voyeurism statute, CGS 53a-189a, is the primary law that governs hidden cameras used to record people without their knowledge.
Elements of Voyeurism
A person is guilty of voyeurism when they knowingly photograph, film, videotape, or otherwise record the image of another person:
- Without the knowledge and consent of that person
- While that person is not in plain view
- Under circumstances where that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy
The statute applies in two scenarios: when the recording is done with malice, or when it is done with intent to arouse or satisfy sexual desire.
Definition of "In Plain View"
The statute specifically clarifies that "in plain view" does not include any view achieved by photographing, filming, or recording under or around a person's clothing. This means that "upskirting" or similar recording is always illegal regardless of where it occurs.
Voyeurism Penalties
Voyeurism carries serious criminal consequences:
- First offense: Class D felony, carrying up to 5 years in prison and up to $5,000 in fines
- Subsequent offenses: Class C felony, carrying 1 to 10 years in prison and up to $10,000 in fines
- First offense involving a minor under 16: Class C felony with the same enhanced penalties
- First offense by a person with prior sex offense convictions: Class C felony
Disseminating Voyeuristic Material
Under CGS 53a-189b, sharing images or recordings obtained through voyeurism is a separate Class D felony. Anyone who disseminates voyeuristic material knowing it was obtained without the subject's consent faces up to 5 years in prison and up to $5,000 in fines.
Nanny Cams in Connecticut
Using nanny cams in Connecticut is legal with important limitations. Parents and guardians may install video cameras in their home to monitor caregivers, but the rules differ for video and audio.
Video-Only Nanny Cams
Video-only nanny cams are generally legal in common areas of your home such as:
- Living rooms and family rooms
- Kitchens and dining areas
- Playrooms and nurseries
- Hallways and entryways
You are not required to inform your nanny or babysitter about video-only cameras in these areas, though many employment attorneys recommend disclosure as a best practice.
Nanny Cams with Audio
If your nanny cam records audio, Connecticut's consent requirements apply. Since you are typically not present during the conversations being recorded, you are not a party to those conversations. Recording audio without consent in this situation could violate the eavesdropping statute.
You should notify your caregiver in writing if your cameras record audio. This written notification protects you legally and ensures compliance with Connecticut law.
Off-Limits Areas for Nanny Cams
Never place nanny cams in:
- Bathrooms used by the caregiver
- A designated changing area for the caregiver
- A private room where the caregiver sleeps (for live-in arrangements)
Recording in these areas could constitute voyeurism under CGS 53a-189a.
Neighbor Disputes and Surveillance Cameras
Disputes between neighbors over surveillance cameras are increasingly common in Connecticut. The Connecticut General Assembly's Office of Legislative Research addressed this issue in OLR Report 2009-R-0359, which remains the key reference for residential surveillance disputes.
When a Neighbor's Camera Points at Your Property
Whether a neighbor's surveillance camera violates your privacy depends on several factors:
- Front yards and driveways: These areas are generally in plain view and carry limited privacy expectations. A neighbor's camera that captures your front yard is unlikely to violate any law.
- Enclosed backyards: A fenced backyard that is not visible from public areas may carry a reasonable expectation of privacy. A camera specifically aimed at such an area could raise legal issues.
- Interior of your home: A camera that can see inside your home through windows is more likely to violate privacy protections.
Legal Remedies for Privacy Invasion
If a neighbor's camera intrudes on your privacy, Connecticut offers several potential remedies:
- Voyeurism charges: If the recording meets the elements of CGS 53a-189a (recording without consent in a private area with malice or sexual intent), criminal charges may apply.
- Common law invasion of privacy: The Connecticut Supreme Court recognizes the tort of intrusion upon seclusion. To prevail, you must prove intentional intrusion into your privacy that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person.
- Nuisance claims: In extreme cases, a camera that substantially interferes with your use and enjoyment of your property may constitute a private nuisance.
Practical Steps
Before pursuing legal action, consider these practical steps:
- Talk to your neighbor about your concerns
- Install privacy fencing or landscaping to block camera views
- Document the camera's placement and what it captures
- Consult with a local attorney if the situation does not improve
Landlord and Tenant Surveillance
Connecticut does not have a specific statute governing landlord surveillance cameras in rental properties. However, existing privacy laws provide significant protections for tenants.
Common Area Cameras
Landlords may generally install surveillance cameras in common areas of multi-unit buildings, including lobbies, hallways, stairwells, parking areas, and building entrances. These areas are visible to all residents and typically do not carry a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Tenant Privacy Protections
Landlords may not install cameras that record inside a tenant's individual unit or in areas where tenants have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Under CGS 47a-16, landlords may only enter a rented unit at reasonable times with reasonable notice for specific purposes such as inspections and repairs. Installing surveillance inside a unit without tenant consent would violate both this entry restriction and broader privacy protections.
Penalties Summary Table
| Violation | Statute | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Voyeurism (first offense) | CGS 53a-189a | Class D felony | 5 years prison, $5,000 fine |
| Voyeurism (subsequent) | CGS 53a-189a | Class C felony | 10 years prison, $10,000 fine |
| Eavesdropping | CGS 53a-189 | Class D felony | 5 years prison, $5,000 fine |
| Tampering with communications | CGS 53a-188 | Class A misdemeanor | 1 year prison, $2,000 fine |
| Disseminating voyeuristic material | CGS 53a-189b | Class D felony | 5 years prison, $5,000 fine |
| Workplace monitoring without notice (first) | CGS 31-48d | Civil penalty | $500 |
| Workplace monitoring without notice (third+) | CGS 31-48d | Civil penalty | $3,000 |
| Surveillance device in a retail dressing room | CGS 53-41a | Criminal | $500 fine, 3 months imprisonment |
| Surveillance in employee private areas (first) | CGS 31-48b | Criminal | $500 fine |
| Recording employment negotiations | CGS 31-48b | Criminal | 1 year prison, $1,000 fine |
Related Connecticut Camera and Privacy Laws
- Connecticut Recording Laws covers the consent rule that governs camera audio in Connecticut.
- Connecticut Security Camera Recording Rules explains the recording-law side of camera use.
- Connecticut Biometric Privacy Laws addresses facial recognition and biometric data.
- Connecticut Ring Doorbell Laws covers video doorbell rules in Connecticut.
Common Camera Questions
These national guides answer the most common surveillance camera questions:
- HOA Security Camera Rules
- Neighbor Security Camera Laws
- Nanny Cam Laws
- Workplace Surveillance Camera Laws
- Landlord Security Camera Laws
More Connecticut Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I install a security camera on my property in Connecticut without telling my neighbors?
Yes. Connecticut does not require you to notify your neighbors before installing security cameras on your own property. You may place cameras on your home, garage, driveway, and other areas you own. However, your cameras must not be aimed at areas where neighbors have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as inside their home or in a fully enclosed backyard. Cameras that capture common views like the street, sidewalk, or your shared property line are generally permissible.
Does my employer have to tell me about workplace surveillance cameras in Connecticut?
Yes. Under CGS 31-48d, Connecticut employers must provide prior written notice to all employees who may be affected by electronic monitoring, including surveillance cameras. The employer must also post a notice in a conspicuous location. Two limits apply. Cameras collecting information for security purposes in common areas held out for use by the public are excluded from the definition of electronic monitoring, so no notice is owed for them, and the section does not apply at all to a criminal investigation. An employer may also monitor without prior notice when it has reasonable grounds to believe an employee is engaged in illegal conduct, rights violations, or creating a hostile work environment. Employers who fail to provide notice face civil penalties of $500 to $3,000 per violation.
Is it legal to use a nanny cam with audio recording in Connecticut?
Video-only nanny cams are legal in common areas of your home such as living rooms, kitchens, and playrooms. However, if your nanny cam records audio, you should notify your caregiver because Connecticut law restricts recording conversations you are not a party to. You must never place cameras in bathrooms, changing areas, or private rooms designated for the caregiver. Written notification about audio recording is strongly recommended to avoid potential eavesdropping liability.
What are the penalties for illegal surveillance or voyeurism in Connecticut?
Voyeurism under CGS 53a-189a is a Class D felony for a first offense, carrying up to 5 years in prison and a $5,000 fine. Subsequent offenses or cases involving minors under 16 are elevated to a Class C felony with up to 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine. Eavesdropping (illegal audio recording) under CGS 53a-189 is also a Class D felony. Disseminating voyeuristic material under CGS 53a-189b is a separate Class D felony.
Can my landlord install surveillance cameras in my apartment building in Connecticut?
Landlords may install cameras in common areas such as lobbies, hallways, stairwells, and parking lots. However, they cannot install cameras inside your individual rental unit or in areas where you have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Under CGS 47a-16, landlords may only enter your unit at reasonable times with reasonable notice for specific purposes like inspections and repairs. Installing surveillance inside your unit without your consent would violate both landlord-tenant law and privacy protections.
Updates
Added Connecticut’s dressing-room surveillance ban (CGS 53-41a) and corrected the workplace monitoring section: security cameras in public common areas are excluded from the CGS 31-48d notice duty, and the statute does not apply at all to a criminal investigation.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Connecticut General Statutes, Title 53a (Penal Code), Chapter 952
§ 53a-189aVoyeurism: Class D or C felony.In forcecited in 13 of our articles
(a) A person is guilty of voyeurism when, (1) with malice, such person knowingly photographs, films, videotapes or otherwise records the image of another person (A) without the knowledge and consent of such other person, (B) while such other person is not in plain view, and (C) under circumstances where such other person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, (2) with intent to arouse or satisfy the sexual desire of such person or any other person, such person knowingly photographs, films, videotapes or otherwise records the image of another person (A) without the knowledge and consent of such other person, (B) while such other person is not in plain view, and (C) under circumstances where such other person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, (3) with the intent to arouse or satisfy the sexual desire of such person, commits simple trespass, as provided in section 53a-110a, and observes, in other than a casual or cursory manner, another person (A) without the knowledge or consent of such other person, (B) while such other person is inside a dwelling, as defined in section 53a-100, and not in plain view, and (C) under circumstances where such other person has a reasonable…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at cga.ct.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):In State v. Panek (2018) the Connecticut Supreme Court held that the 'not in plain view' element of section 53a-189a refers to the view of the general public, not of the person recording, and that the statute reaches a nonconsensual recording made in the victim's immediate presence. It rejected a vagueness challenge.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Panek (Supreme Court of Connecticut 2018, 328 Conn. 219)✓A man secretly recorded women during sexual encounters in his own home and argued they were in his plain view, so the voyeurism statute did not reach him; the Connecticut Supreme Court held the 'not in plain view' element refers to the public's view, reversing the dismissal.
- Middlesex Insurance v. Mara (District Court, D. Connecticut 2010, 699 F. Supp. 2d 439)✓Neighbors sued a homeowner for a campaign of harassment, including a voyeurism count under the statute for videotaping a woman; the federal court found every count alleged intentional acts excluded from his homeowner's policy and declared the insurer had no duty to defend.
- Project Veritas v. Michael Schmidt (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2023, 72 F.4th 1043)“…ev. Stat. Ann. §§ 18-9-301(8), 18-9- 304(1)(a) Connecticut: Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 53a-189a(a)(1); Connecticut v. Panek, 177 A.3d 1…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Connecticut Landlord-Tenant Recording and Surveillance Laws (2026), Connecticut Medical Recording Laws: Patients, Doctors, and HIPAA Rules (2026), Connecticut Laws on Recording in Public: What Is Legal (2026)
Connecticut General Statutes, Title 52 (Civil Actions), Chapter 925
§ 52-570dAction for illegal recording of private telephonic communications.In forcecited in 21 of our articles
(a) No person shall use any instrument, device or equipment to record an oral private telephonic communication unless the use of such instrument, device or equipment (1) is preceded by consent of all parties to the communication and such prior consent either is obtained in writing or is part of, and obtained at the start of, the recording, or (2) is preceded by verbal notification which is recorded at the beginning and is part of the communication by the recording party, or (3) is accompanied by an automatic tone warning device which automatically produces a distinct signal that is repeated at intervals of approximately fifteen seconds during the communication while such instrument, device or equipment is in use.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at cga.ct.gov
Cited in 22 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Holler v. Buckley Broadcasting Corp. (1998) held section 52-570d creates a cause of action unknown at common law that is strictly construed, and does not reach a third party's rerecording of an already illegal tape. Jezouit v. Malloy (2019) held the statute does not waive the state's sovereign immunity from suit.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Holler v. Buckley Broadcasting Corp. (Connecticut Appellate Court 1998, 47 Conn. App. 764)✓A girlfriend secretly taped a radio employee's call, and a coworker re-recorded that tape and used it to get him fired. The court held section 52-570d, strictly construed, bars taping a private call but not a third party's re-recording of an already illegal tape.
- Jezouit v. Malloy (Connecticut Appellate Court 2019, 193 Conn. App. 576)“…his complaint because (1) he brought his claim pursuant to General Statutes § 52-570d, which he contends waives sovereign imm…”
- State v. Skok (Supreme Court of Connecticut 2015)“…on without the consent of all parties to the communication. General Statutes § 52-570d (a) prohibits the use of ‘‘any instrume…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Can I Sue Someone for Recording Me on Private or Public Property?, Connecticut Audio Recording Laws: Mixed Consent Rules and Penalties (2026), Connecticut Dashcam Laws: Mounting Rules, Audio Recording, and Evidence (2026)
Connecticut General Statutes, Title 47a (Landlord and Tenant), Chapter 830
§ 47a-16When landlord may enter rented unit.In force
(a) A tenant shall not unreasonably withhold consent to the landlord to enter into the dwelling unit in order to inspect the premises, make necessary or agreed to repairs, alterations or improvements, supply necessary or agreed to services or exhibit the dwelling unit to prospective or actual purchasers, mortgagees, tenants, workmen or contractors. (b) A landlord may enter the dwelling unit without consent of the tenant in case of emergency. (c) A landlord shall not abuse the right of entry or use such right of entry to harass the tenant. The landlord shall give the tenant reasonable written or oral notice of his intent to enter and may enter only at reasonable times, except in case of emergency. (d) A landlord may not enter the dwelling unit without the consent of the tenant except (1) in case of emergency, (2) as permitted by section 47a-16a, (3) pursuant to a court order, or (4) if the tenant has abandoned or surrendered the premises.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at cga.ct.gov
Cited in 24 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Reader v. Cassarino (Connecticut Appellate Court 1998, 51 Conn. App. 292)“…had violated General Statutes § 47a-43, 4 *295 CUTPA and General Statutes 47a-16 et seq. The trial court articulated tha…”
- HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence (Connecticut Appellate Court 2012, 133 Conn. App. 321)“…ctions did not constitute an unlawful entry in violation of General Statutes § 47a-16 and thereby entitle her to damages unde…”
- Tarka v. Filipovic (Connecticut Appellate Court 1997, 45 Conn. App. 46)“…he plaintiff alleged (1) unauthorized entry in violation of General Statutes § 47a-16 (d) and damages in accordance with Gene…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Connecticut General Statutes Chapter 557 - Employment Regulation (CGS 31-48b and 31-48d)(cga.ct.gov).gov
- Connecticut General Statutes Chapter 952 - Penal Code: Offenses (CGS 53a-187 through 53a-189b)(cga.ct.gov).gov
- Connecticut General Statutes Chapter 925 - Statutory Rights of Action (CGS 52-570d)(cga.ct.gov).gov
- OLR Report 2009-R-0359: Use of Surveillance Cameras in Residential Areas(cga.ct.gov).gov
- Connecticut General Statutes Chapter 830 - Rights and Responsibilities of Landlord and Tenant (CGS 47a-16)(cga.ct.gov).gov
- OLR Report 98-R-0431: Employee Privacy(cga.ct.gov).gov
- OLR Report 2003-R-0026: Connecticut Voyeurism Laws(cga.ct.gov).gov
- Connecticut General Statutes Chapter 939 - Offenses Against the Person (CGS 53-41a, surveillance devices in dressing rooms)(cga.ct.gov)