Arizona
Arizona Squatters Rights and Adverse Possession Laws (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Arizona runs a three-track adverse possession system: the general 10-year period under A.R.S. § 12-526, a 3-year shortcut when a squatter holds color of title under § 12-523, meaning a chain of transfers that is irregular precisely because a document was never recorded or was not duly recorded, and a 5-year path when the occupant holds a recorded deed and has paid property taxes under §§ 12-524 and 12-525. Property owners remove squatters through forcible entry and detainer proceedings in justice court; self-help removal is unlawful.
Verification note: Statutes confirmed at azleg.gov on 2026-08-27. This page reflects Arizona law as of that date. Consult a licensed Arizona attorney before acting on any information here.
Jurisdiction scope: This page covers Arizona state law only. For a 50-state comparison, see the national squatters rights guide.
Adverse Possession in Arizona: The 3, 5, and 10-Year Periods
Arizona does not use a single limitation period for adverse possession. The legislature created three tracks that can ripen into ownership against an owner of record, each requiring a different combination of documentation, tax conduct, and possession duration. All three share the same five core elements, but the required proof and timeline change depending on the squatter's documentary situation.
A fourth provision in the same article, A.R.S. § 12-522, sets a two-year limit on actions to recover possession from a party who claims real property by right of possession only, and it excuses that party from showing title or color of title as against a plaintiff who shows no better right. Because it operates only against a plaintiff with no better right, § 12-522 does not defeat an owner of record, so it is not a route to title for a squatter facing an owner who holds a deed.

The Five Elements Every Arizona Claim Must Meet
Before any statute of limitations can run in the claimant's favor, Arizona courts require proof of five elements:
- Actual possession. The occupant must physically use and control the land in the way an owner would, such as living on the property, farming it, or maintaining it.
- Open and notorious possession. The use must be visible to any reasonable observer, putting the true owner on notice that someone is asserting a claim.
- Exclusive possession. The claimant cannot share possession with the public or with the true owner; the use must mirror sole ownership.
- Hostile or adverse possession. The occupant must use the land without the owner's permission. A tenant with a lease, or anyone holding with the owner's consent, cannot satisfy this element regardless of how long they stay.
- Continuous possession. Possession must be unbroken for the full statutory period. Seasonal or sporadic use generally fails unless it matches how a typical owner would use that type of land.
Track 1: 10 Years (General Rule, A.R.S. § 12-526)
The general adverse possession period in Arizona is 10 years. A claimant who establishes all five elements for a full decade can bring an action to quiet title. Section 12-526 caps claims at 160 acres unless the adverse possession is held under a recorded written memorandum of title that fixes the boundaries, in which case the claim extends to the boundaries described in that instrument.
Track 2: 3 Years With Color of Title (A.R.S. § 12-523)
The shortest path cuts the period to 3 years, but only when the occupant holds actual title or color of title. Arizona defines color of title as a consecutive chain of transfers down to the current possessor that is irregular because of a recording defect or similar technical flaw, provided no dishonesty is involved. A squatter who can show a documented but imperfect chain of transfers stretching to their possession, and who maintains peaceable adverse possession for 3 years, may bring a claim under this track.
Track 3: 5 Years With Recorded Deed and Tax Payments (A.R.S. §§ 12-524 and 12-525)
Two parallel 5-year statutes require both a recorded deed and payment of property taxes:

- A.R.S. § 12-524 applies specifically to lots located in a city or town. The occupant must hold a recorded deed, claim ownership of the lot, and have paid all property taxes on the lot for at least five consecutive years before the action is commenced.
- A.R.S. § 12-525 applies more broadly to real property outside the city-lot context. The occupant must hold a recorded deed, actively cultivate or use the land, and pay all taxes during the 5-year period. The track is unavailable when the claimed title derives from a forged deed or a deed executed under a forged power of attorney.
In both cases, payment of property taxes is a hard requirement, not just a supporting factor. An occupant who skips even one year of taxes during the statutory window loses the benefit of the 5-year period and must rely on the longer 10-year general track.
Claiming Under Multiple Tracks
A.R.S. § 12-521(B) codifies tacking, the practice of adding successive periods of adverse possession together: peaceable and adverse possession need not be continued in the same person, but there must be privity of estate between the successive possessors (for example, a buyer and seller who both used the land adversely). Tacking applies across all three tracks, but the claimant must still satisfy the documentary and tax requirements for whichever track they invoke.
When the limitation period has run, A.R.S. § 12-527 provides that the person who pleads and is entitled to the bar is held to have full title precluding all claims. That is the provision that turns a successful limitations defense into ownership rather than a bare right to remain.
How to Remove a Squatter in Arizona
Arizona property owners have one legal pathway to remove an unwanted occupant: the forcible entry and detainer (FED) process under A.R.S. Title 12, Chapter 8.

Step-by-Step Removal Process
-
Serve written notice. Before filing, serve the occupant with a written demand for possession. The demand requirement against a non-tenant comes from the forcible entry and detainer article itself: A.R.S. § 12-1171(3) reaches a person who holds over after a written demand for possession by the person entitled to possession, and A.R.S. § 12-1173 supplies the five-day figure, treating a refusal to surrender possession for five days after written demand as forcible detainer. The five-day and ten-day notices in the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act run against a tenant under a rental agreement and do not supply the demand requirement for an occupant who never had a lease. The notice must clearly identify the property and demand that the occupant leave.
-
File in justice court. If the occupant does not vacate after the notice period, file a forcible detainer complaint in the justice court for the precinct where the property is located. Filing fees and local rules vary by precinct.
-
Attend the hearing. Under A.R.S. § 12-1177, the only issue at a FED hearing is the right of actual possession; title disputes are not decided in these proceedings. Justice court postponements are capped at three calendar days and require good cause shown by affidavit.
-
Obtain and execute the writ. If the court rules for the property owner, a writ of restitution is issued authorizing the sheriff or constable to remove the occupant. The owner cannot physically remove the person; only the authorized officer may do so under the writ.
No Self-Help Eviction in Arizona
Arizona law requires property owners to remove any occupant, including a squatter, through the court-based forcible entry and detainer process described above rather than through self-help. A.R.S. § 33-1367 lets a tenant recover up to two months of periodic rent or twice the actual damages, whichever is greater, when a landlord unlawfully excludes the tenant or cuts off utilities such as electricity, gas, or water. That remedy is part of the Arizona Residential Landlord and Tenant Act and, by its text, governs the landlord-tenant relationship; the statutes linked on this page do not extend § 33-1367's specific damages remedy to a non-tenant squatter who never had a lease.
One reminder: If the squatter has been on the property long enough to potentially satisfy any of the three adverse possession tracks, consult a quiet-title attorney before proceeding with eviction. A FED action resolves possession only and does not extinguish a colorable adverse possession claim.
2026 Expedited Removal Law (SB 1426)
Arizona enacted SB 1426 in 2026, creating a faster forcible-detainer track aimed at what the statute calls an unauthorized person rather than a tenant. Governor Hobbs signed the bill (Chapter 69) on May 29, 2026. Because the act carries no emergency clause, it takes effect on Arizona's general effective date for the 2026 regular session, September 12, 2026. Once a court enters judgment against the unauthorized person under this track, it must issue a writ of restitution immediately rather than after the standard waiting period, which speeds removal compared with the standard forcible detainer process; the statute itself does not specify a resulting number of days.
The track is deliberately narrow, because the session law requires every one of its conditions to be satisfied. The person must be unlawfully occupying a residential dwelling that was not open to the public when they entered, the request to leave must come from the property owner or the owner's authorized agent, and the owner must have directed the person to leave. Four further conditions carve out occupants who can resemble squatters but are not: the person must not be a current or former tenant at that property, must not have had a prior verbal or written agreement to cohabitate with the property owner in that dwelling, must not be an immediate family member of the property owner, and there must be no litigation already pending between the owner and that person. If any single condition fails, the owner is back on the standard FED process described above.
Legal disclaimer: This page provides general legal information about Arizona law and does not constitute legal advice. Laws can change, and individual circumstances vary. Consult a licensed Arizona attorney before making decisions about adverse possession, property rights, or eviction proceedings.
Page last reviewed: August 2026. Arizona law verified at azleg.gov.
For laws in other states, see the national squatters rights guide.
More Arizona Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does a squatter have to be on your property in Arizona before they have rights?
The shortest period that can mature into title against an owner of record is 3 years, and only when the squatter holds color of title under A.R.S. § 12-523, meaning a chain of transfers that is defective because an instrument was never properly recorded or has a similar flaw. Without color of title, the period is either 5 years (with a recorded deed and continuous tax payments) or 10 years under the general rule. A separate two-year limit in A.R.S. § 12-522 applies only where a party claims by right of possession only and the plaintiff shows no better right, so it does not run against an owner holding a deed.
Does a squatter have to pay property taxes to claim adverse possession in Arizona?
Tax payment is required only for the two 5-year tracks under A.R.S. §§ 12-524 and 12-525. The 3-year color-of-title track and the 10-year general track do not list tax payment as a statutory element, though courts may consider it as evidence of a hostile claim.
Can I remove a squatter myself in Arizona?
No. Arizona law requires you to remove an occupant through the forcible entry and detainer process; self-help methods such as changing locks or cutting utilities are not the lawful removal path. A.R.S. § 33-1367's specific damages remedy for unlawful lockouts and utility shutoffs is a tenant protection under the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act and does not, by its text, extend to a non-tenant squatter with no lease. You must file a forcible entry and detainer action in justice court and obtain a writ of restitution enforced by a sheriff or constable.
Does Arizona have an expedited squatter removal process like some other states?
Yes, starting in 2026. Arizona SB 1426, signed by Gov. Hobbs on May 29, 2026 (Chapter 69) and effective September 12, 2026, fast-tracks removal of what the statute calls an unauthorized person: once the court enters judgment, it must issue a writ of restitution immediately. The track is narrow. It reaches only someone unlawfully occupying a residential property that was not open to the public when they entered, and it is unavailable if that person is a current or former tenant at the property, is an immediate family member of the owner, had a prior verbal or written agreement to cohabitate with the owner, or already has litigation pending with the owner. Those cases still go through the standard forcible entry and detainer process under A.R.S. Title 12, Chapter 8.
What is color of title in Arizona adverse possession law?
Color of title under A.R.S. § 12-523 is a consecutive chain of transfers leading to the current possessor that is technically defective due to a recording flaw or similar issue, but that does not involve dishonesty. A squatter with color of title can mature an adverse possession claim in just 3 years instead of 10.
Can a squatter claim adverse possession on a city lot in Arizona?
Yes, but A.R.S. § 12-524 sets specific requirements: the squatter must hold a recorded deed, assert ownership of the lot, and pay all property taxes on it for at least five consecutive years before filing an action to recover. The general 10-year period under § 12-526 is also available if those conditions are not met.
What is the first step to remove a squatter in Arizona?
Serve a written demand for possession on the occupant. Under A.R.S. §§ 12-1171 and 12-1173, a person who refuses to surrender possession for five days after that written demand is guilty of forcible detainer, so once those five days pass you may file a forcible detainer complaint in the justice court for the precinct where the property is located.
Updates
Corrected the removal-notice citation to Arizona's forcible entry and detainer statutes (A.R.S. §§ 12-1171 and 12-1173) instead of a landlord-tenant provision that does not reach an occupant with no lease, fixed the description of color of title, and added the two-year limitation in § 12-522, the statutory basis for tacking in § 12-521(B), and the effect of § 12-527.
Corrected the signing date and effective date of Arizona's 2026 expedited squatter removal law (SB 1426, Chapter 69): the Governor approved it May 29, 2026, not June 1, and it takes effect September 12, 2026, not around September 1; also removed an unsupported claim about the exact number of days the new process saves.
Updated the page to reflect Arizona SB 1426 (2026), which creates a fast-track forcible-detainer removal process for unauthorized occupants effective around September 1, 2026, and corrected a misstatement about the good-cause requirement for justice-court trial postponements.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected three instances where A.R.S. 33-1367, a Residential Landlord-Tenant Act remedy for tenants, was cited as prohibiting self-help removal against non-tenant squatters; the page now scopes that statute to the landlord-tenant relationship and notes the linked statutes do not extend it to squatters with no lease.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 12 (Courts and Civil Proceedings), Chapter 5 (LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS), Article 2 (Real Actions)
§ 12-526Real property in adverse possession and use by possessor; ten year limitation; limit of area; fixing of boundaries under duly recorded memorandum of titleIn force
A. A person who has a cause of action for recovery of any lands, tenements or hereditaments from a person having peaceable and adverse possession thereof, cultivating, using and enjoying such property, shall commence an action therefor within ten years after the cause of action accrues, and not afterward. B. The peaceable and adverse possession referred to in subsection A shall not embrace more than one hundred and sixty acres, including the improvements or the number of acres actually enclosed if less than one hundred and sixty acres is so enclosed, but when such adverse possession is taken and held under some written memorandum of title other than a deed which fixes the boundaries of the possessor's claim and is duly recorded, such possession shall be construed to be coextensive with the boundaries specified in such instrument.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-07 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 51 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Berryhill v. Moore (1994) denied tacking for the riverbed portion because it was not actually or exclusively possessed during a needed two-year period. Overson v. Cowley (1982) held § 12-526(B) does not make enclosure a universal requirement for claims to 160 acres or less.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Berryhill v. Moore (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1994, 180 Ariz. 77)✓A flood split a disputed boundary strip. The court upheld adverse possession of the used portion but excluded the riverbed portion because the claimants could not tack a period when it was not actually possessed. The mortgage lien also survived.
- Flood Control Dist. v. Gaines (Court of Appeals of Arizona 2002, 202 Ariz. 248)✓A dam breach led land interests to assert inverse condemnation against a county flood-control district. The court held § 12-821's one-year period for public-entity actions superseded § 12-526's ten-year period, then reversed and remanded for the unresolved accrual question.
- Desruisseau v. Isley (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1976, 27 Ariz. App. 257)✓Neighbors disputed a nine-foot strip improved by the occupants. The court reversed title based on estoppel; the ten-year adverse-possession period had not run, and the owner's acquiescence in improvements did not itself transfer legal title.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 12-523Real property in adverse possession under title or color of title; three year limitationIn force
A. An action to recover real property from a person in peaceable and adverse possession under title or color of title shall be commenced within three years after the cause of action accrues, and not afterward. B. "Title" means a regular chain of transfer from or under sovereignty of the soil. "Color of title" means a consecutive chain of such transfer down to the person in possession without being regular, as if one or more of the memorials or muniments is not recorded or not duly recorded or is only in writing, or such like defect as does not extend to or include the want of intrinsic fairness and honesty, or when the party in possession holds the real property by a land warrant or land scrip, with a chain of transfer down to him in possession.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 15 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- RANCH 57 v. City of Yuma (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1986, 152 Ariz. 218)“…ve argued that the following statutes of limitations apply: A.R.S. §§ 12-523, 28-1868, 12-542(3), 12-526(A), and 12-…”
- Warren v. Whitehall Income Fund 86 (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1991, 170 Ariz. 241)“…t title action. (3) Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by ARS Section 12-523. I. Two types of notice e…”
- State v. Crawford (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1970, 13 Ariz. App. 225)“…have done, § 12-523 is applicable. Assuming arguendo that A.R.S. § 12-523 applies, defendant’s argument still fai…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 12-524City lot claimed under recorded deed; five year limitationIn force
An action to recover a lot located in a city or town from a person having a recorded deed therefor, who claims ownership and has paid the taxes thereon, shall be brought within five years after the cause of action accrues, and not afterward, provided that the person against whom the action is brought, by himself or his grantors, has claimed ownership thereof and has paid the taxes thereon for at least five consecutive years next preceding the commencement of such action.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 7 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Quality Plastics, Inc. v. Moore (Arizona Supreme Court 1981, 131 Ariz. 238)“…they nevertheless have title to the property by virtue of A.R.S. §§ 12-524 and 12-527. The first issue to b…”
- Dominguez v. Dominguez (Arizona Supreme Court 2025, 567 P.3d 81)“…eed. 1 The primary issue here concerns the applicability of A.R.S. § 12-524, which establishes a five-year statute…”
- Henderson v. Tejada (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1976, 26 Ariz. App. 462)“…that Tejada had established adverse possession un *466 der A.R.S. § 12-524. That statute provides : “An action t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 12-525Real property in adverse possession and use under duly recorded deed with possessor paying taxes; five year limitation; exceptionIn force
A. An action to recover real property from a person in peaceable and adverse possession, and cultivating, using or enjoying the property, and paying taxes thereon, and claiming under a deed or deeds duly recorded, shall be commenced within five years after the cause of action accrues, and not afterward. B. This section shall not apply to anyone in possession of land, who in the absence of this section would claim title through a forged deed, and no one claiming under a forged deed or a deed executed under a forged power of attorney shall be allowed the benefits of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2017
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- River Farms, Inc. v. Fountain (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1974, 21 Ariz. App. 504)“…onclusions of law we find the most applicable statute to be A.R.S. § 12-525: “§ 12-525. Real property in adverse…”
- Nicholas v. Giles (Arizona Supreme Court 1967, 102 Ariz. 130)“…ars next preceding the commencement of such action.” A.R.S. § 12-525 provides: “A. An action to recov…”
- Bowen v. Sil-Flo Corporation (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1969, 9 Ariz. App. 268)“…277 session, see 30 U.S.C.A. § 38 , A.R.S. § 12-525, and Eagle-Picher Mining & Smelting Co.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 12 (Courts and Civil Proceedings), Chapter 8 (SPECIAL ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO PROPERTY), Article 4 (Forcible Entry and Detainer)
§ 12-1171Acts which constitute forcible entry or detainerIn force
A person is guilty of forcible entry and detainer, or of forcible detainer, as the case may be, if he: 1. Makes an entry into any lands, tenements or other real property, except in cases where entry is given by law. 2. Makes such an entry by force. 3. Wilfully and without force holds over any lands, tenements or other real property after termination of the time for which such lands, tenements or other real property were let to him or to the person under whom he claims, after demand made in writing for the possession thereof by the person entitled to such possession.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 36 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Colonial Tri-City Ltd. Partnership v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc. (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1993, 179 Ariz. 428)“…written demand for possession of the premises, pursuant to A.R.S. section 12-1171(3) (1982). The trial court, however, de…”
- Alton v. Tower Capital Co. (Arizona Supreme Court 1979, 123 Ariz. 602)“…604 Forcible entry and detainer actions are governed by A.R.S. § 12-1171 et seq. A.R.S. § 12 — 1173 provides:…”
- Lakin Cattle Company v. Engelthaler (Arizona Supreme Court 1966, 101 Ariz. 282)“…of forcible detainer pursuant to A.R.S. § 33-361 and A.R.S. § 12-1171 et seq. George Engelthaler, Dan Ford, a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 12-1177Trial and issue; postponement of trialIn force
A. On the trial of an action of forcible entry or forcible detainer, the only issue shall be the right of actual possession and the merits of title shall not be inquired into. B. If a jury is demanded, it shall return a verdict of guilty or not guilty of the charge as stated in the complaint. If a jury is not demanded the action shall be tried by the court. C. For good cause shown, supported by affidavit, the trial may be postponed for a time not to exceed three calendar days in a justice court or ten calendar days in the superior court.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 52 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Curtis v. Morris (Arizona Supreme Court 1996, 186 Ariz. 534)“…orcible detainer, notwithstanding the contrary provision of A.R.S. § 12-1177(A). We agree with Division One that § 1…”
- Mead, Samuel & Co., Inc. v. Dyar (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1980, 127 Ariz. 565)“…t of his counterclaims. To reach this result he relies upon A.R.S. § 12-1177A which provides that: “[0]n the…”
- Taylor v. Stanford (Arizona Supreme Court 1966, 100 Ariz. 346)“…reasons to follow this writ must be made permanent. A.R.S. § 12-1177, subsec. A provides as follows:…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 33 (Property), Chapter 10 (ARIZONA RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT), Article 4 (Remedies)
§ 33-1367Tenant's remedies for landlord's unlawful ouster, exclusion or diminution of servicesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
If the landlord unlawfully removes or excludes the tenant from the premises or wilfully diminishes services to the tenant by interrupting or causing the interruption of electric, gas, water or other essential service to the tenant, the tenant may recover possession or terminate the rental agreement and, in either case, recover an amount not more than two months' periodic rent or twice the actual damages sustained by him, whichever is greater. If the rental agreement is terminated the landlord shall return all security recoverable under section 33-1321.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at azleg.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Schaefer v. Murphey (Arizona Supreme Court 1982, 131 Ariz. 295)“…remises; c. $624 for unlawful ouster in violation of A.R.S. § 33-1367. Landlord filed a notice of appe…”
- Thomas v. Goudreault (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1989, 163 Ariz. 159)“…ourt also awarded retaliatory damages of $2,050 pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 33-1367 and 33-1381, attorney’s fees in the amo…”
- Mead, Samuel & Co., Inc. v. Dyar (Court of Appeals of Arizona 1980, 127 Ariz. 565)“…visions of the Arizona Residential Landlord and Tenant Act. A.R.S. § 33-1367 provides remedies to the tenant for unl…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arizona Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Rights for Renters and Property Owners
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-526 (10-year general adverse possession period)(azleg.gov).gov
- Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-523 (3-year color-of-title adverse possession)(azleg.gov).gov
- Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-524 (5-year adverse possession, city/town lots)(azleg.gov).gov
- Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-525 (5-year adverse possession, recorded deed + taxes)(azleg.gov).gov
- Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1171 (Forcible entry and detainer definitions)(azleg.gov).gov
- Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1177 (FED trial procedures, justice court)(azleg.gov).gov
- Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 33-1367 (Tenant's remedy for a landlord's unlawful ouster or utility shutoff)(azleg.gov).gov
- Arizona Session Laws 2026, Chapter 69 (SB 1426), approved by the Governor May 29, 2026(azleg.gov).gov
- Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1173 (Forcible detainer; five days after written demand for possession)(azleg.gov)
- Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-521 (Adverse and peaceable possession defined; tacking and privity of estate)(azleg.gov)
- Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-522 (Two-year limitation where possession is claimed by right of possession only)(azleg.gov)
- Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-527 (Bar of the action vests full title precluding all claims)(azleg.gov)