Michigan
Michigan Freedom of Information Act: 5 Business Days, Fees, and How to Appeal
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 4, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Michigan's Freedom of Information Act gives any person, with one notable exception, the right to inspect and copy state and local government records, with a 5 business day response deadline, tightly capped fees, and a free internal appeal to the head of the public body before any lawsuit.
This page covers Michigan state and local records under Act 442 of 1976. Records held by federal agencies run under the federal Freedom of Information Act, which shares the name but not the rules: see how to file a FOIA request. For the corresponding rules in the other 49 states, start at our public records laws by state hub.
Who can request, and the two exclusions that surprise people
MCL 15.233 states the core right: "upon providing a public body's FOIA coordinator with a written request that describes a public record sufficiently to enable the public body to find the public record, a person has a right to inspect, copy, or receive copies of the requested public record." The request must include your name, address and contact information unless you qualify as indigent under section 4(2)(a).
There is no residency condition. There is, however, a status exclusion that Michigan writes directly into the definition of "person" at MCL 15.232(g): "Person does not include an individual serving a sentence of imprisonment in a state or county correctional facility in this state or any other state, or in a federal correctional facility." Incarcerated individuals therefore cannot use Michigan FOIA at all, which is a real divergence from federal FOIA and from most other state records laws.
The second surprise is on the government side. MCL 15.232(h) defines "public body" broadly across the executive branch, the legislative branch and local government, but carves out two significant categories:
- The governor's office. The executive branch definition "does not include the governor or lieutenant governor, the executive office of the governor or lieutenant governor, or employees thereof."
- The judiciary. The catch-all for other bodies created or primarily funded by state or local authority excepts "the judiciary, including the office of the county clerk and its employees when acting in the capacity of clerk to the circuit court."
Michigan court records exist and are largely accessible, but you obtain them through court rules and the clerk's own procedures rather than by filing a FOIA request.
The 5 business day clock
MCL 15.235 requires that "a public body shall... respond to a request for a public record within 5 business days after the public body receives the request." A compliant response does one of four things: grants the request, denies it, grants it in part and denies it in part, or issues a notice extending the response period by not more than 10 business days. Only one extension is permitted per request.
Read that as a response deadline rather than a delivery deadline. A grant may arrive with a fee estimate and a deposit demand, and the actual production follows once the deposit is paid. A denial, in whole or in part, must identify the basis for withholding so that you can frame the appeal described below.
Fees: actual incremental cost, and nothing more
MCL 15.234 is unusually prescriptive, which works in requesters' favor because it gives you specific numbers to check an invoice against.
| Charge | Limit |
|---|---|
| Labor to search, examine, review, separate and delete exempt material | Hourly wage of the lowest paid employee capable of doing the work, whether or not that employee performs it |
| Fringe benefits on that labor | Not more than 50 percent of the labor charge |
| Paper copies | Not more than 10 cents per sheet for standard 8.5 by 11 or 8.5 by 14 sheets |
| Nonpaper media and mailing | Actual cost |
| Deposit | Up to 50 percent of the estimated fee, if the total exceeds $50 |
There is also a penalty built into the fee section, and it is the provision most requesters never invoke. Under MCL 15.234(9)(a), a public body that fails to respond in the time MCL 15.235(2) allows must reduce the labor charges otherwise permitted by 5 percent for each day it is late, up to a maximum reduction of 50 percent. The reduction is not automatic in every case; it applies if either of two conditions is met:
- The late response was willful and intentional; or
- The written request either conveyed a request for information within the first 250 words of the body of a letter, fax, email or email attachment, or included the words, characters or abbreviations for "freedom of information," "information," "FOIA," "copy," a recognizable misspelling of those, or an appropriate legal code reference for the act, on the front of an envelope or in the subject line of an email, letter or fax cover page.
The second condition is the practical one, because you control it when you write the request. Put "FOIA request" in your subject line and the trigger is satisfied without anyone having to prove the agency's state of mind. Where the reduction applies, MCL 15.234(9)(b) requires the public body to fully note the charge reduction on the detailed itemization the statute already requires, so it should be visible on the invoice. If a late response arrives with full labor charges and no noted reduction, that is a specific, checkable defect to raise.
Two waiver routes exist. The public body may conduct a search or furnish copies without charge or at a reduced charge if doing so is in the public interest, which is discretionary. Separately, the act requires waiver of the first $20.00 of the fee for an indigent individual who submits an affidavit of indigency, subject to limits including a maximum of twice per calendar year from the same public body and further eligibility conditions. That mandatory $20 waiver is narrow in amount but strong in character, because it is written as an obligation rather than a courtesy.
Michigan public bodies are also required to publish written FOIA procedures and guidelines and a fee itemization form. Asking for those documents first is a cheap way to see how a particular agency calculates before you commit to a large request.
How to file a Michigan FOIA request
- Address the request to the public body's FOIA coordinator. Michigan builds the coordinator role into the statute, and MCL 15.233 measures the right of access from that person's receipt of your written request.
- Put it in writing. Michigan defines "written request" broadly at MCL 15.232(m) to include a writing transmitted by facsimile, electronic mail or other electronic means, so email counts.
- Include your name, address and contact information, unless you are proceeding under the indigency provision.
- Describe the records sufficiently to enable the body to find them: subject, date range, department, and any incident, permit or case number.
- Ask for the body's published FOIA procedures, guidelines and fee itemization form, and ask for a written estimate before authorizing work.
- Diary the 5 business day date. A notice extending the period by up to 10 more business days is permitted once; a second extension is not.
Our free FOIA request generator will draft a Michigan-specific letter with the right citations, and nothing you type into it is stored or transmitted.
Denials, the internal appeal, and going to court
Michigan gives you a free administrative step before litigation, and two formal requirements decide whether it counts.
The internal appeal. You submit a written appeal to the head of the public body. The appeal must specifically contain the word "appeal" and must state the reasons for reversal. The head of the public body must respond within 10 business days, with one permitted extension of up to 10 additional business days. Those two drafting requirements are easy to satisfy and easy to overlook, and an appeal that omits the word "appeal" risks being treated as ordinary correspondence.
Court. Under MCL 15.240 you may file a civil action in the circuit court, or in the Court of Claims where the defendant is a state public body, within 180 days of the final denial. That 180-day window is shorter than many states allow, so calendar it when the denial arrives rather than when you finish negotiating.
What a win is worth. A prevailing requester may be awarded attorneys' fees and costs. Where the court finds the public body arbitrarily and capriciously violated the act by refusing or delaying disclosure, it may additionally assess a civil fine of $1,000 and punitive damages of $1,000.
Police records and body camera footage
The body-camera rules sit outside FOIA, in the Law Enforcement Body-Worn Camera Privacy Act, Act 85 of 2017.
MCL 780.313(2) provides that a recording made by a law enforcement officer with a body-worn camera that is recorded in a private place is exempt from disclosure under FOIA, subject to the exceptions in sections 4 and 5 of that act. Disclosure of body-camera recordings is also subject to crime victim protections under the Crime Victim's Rights Act.
Three practical points follow. The exemption is keyed to the private place, not to the camera, so footage recorded in public spaces is not covered by this provision even though other FOIA exemptions may still apply. The sections 4 and 5 exceptions are the mechanism by which private-place footage can still be released, and they were not independently verified for this page, so ask the agency to identify which one it is applying. And a person actually depicted in a recording generally stands in a different position than a member of the public, which is worth stating explicitly in your request if it applies to you.
Beyond body cameras, the general FOIA exemptions in section 13 of the act govern law enforcement investigating records, and an open investigation remains the most common reason a police records request in Michigan is denied or delayed.
What Michigan FOIA does not cover
Birth, death and marriage certificates are not FOIA records. They come from the Department of Health and Human Services Division of Vital Records and Health Statistics under separate eligibility rules tied to your relationship to the person named. See our Michigan death records guide.
Court files are not FOIA records either, because the judiciary is excluded from the definition of public body. Use the court clerk's own access procedures.
Federal agency records run under 5 U.S.C. 552. The federal statute shares Michigan's name but uses a 20-working-day clock, different fee categories and a different appeal structure: see our guide to filing a federal FOIA request.
Emergency call audio raises questions distinct from ordinary agency paperwork; we cover the general framework in Are 911 calls public records?.
Information on this page reflects Michigan law as of August 2026 and is general legal information, not legal advice. Agency fee schedules and FOIA procedures change. For advice on a specific denial or appeal, consult an attorney licensed in Michigan.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I have to live in Michigan to file a FOIA request?
No. MCL 15.233 grants the right to 'a person' with no residency or citizenship condition. What Michigan does require is that the request identify you: the request must include your name, address and contact information unless you qualify as indigent under section 4(2)(a) of the act.
Can someone in prison file a Michigan FOIA request?
Not under FOIA. MCL 15.232(g) defines 'person' as an individual, corporation, limited liability company, partnership, firm, organization, association, governmental entity or other legal entity, and then adds: 'Person does not include an individual serving a sentence of imprisonment in a state or county correctional facility in this state or any other state, or in a federal correctional facility.' That exclusion is unusual among state records laws and is a genuine difference from federal FOIA, where 5 U.S.C. 552 grants access to 'any person' without a comparable carve-out. Michigan prisoners seeking their own records generally have to look to other statutory or discovery routes rather than to FOIA.
Which Michigan bodies are not covered by FOIA?
Two exclusions in the definition of 'public body' at MCL 15.232(h) do most of the work. First, the executive branch definition covers state officers, employees, agencies, departments, divisions, bureaus, boards, commissions, councils and authorities, 'but does not include the governor or lieutenant governor, the executive office of the governor or lieutenant governor, or employees thereof.' Second, the catch-all for other bodies created or primarily funded by state or local authority carries an express exception: 'the judiciary, including the office of the county clerk and its employees when acting in the capacity of clerk to the circuit court, is not included in the definition of public body.' Court records in Michigan are therefore obtained through court rules and the clerk's own access procedures, not through FOIA.
How fast must a Michigan public body respond?
MCL 15.235 requires the public body to respond within 5 business days after receiving the request by doing one of four things: granting it, denying it, granting it in part and denying it in part, or issuing a notice extending the response period by not more than 10 business days. Only one extension is permitted per request. Note that this is a response deadline rather than a guaranteed production deadline; a grant may be accompanied by a fee estimate and a production timeline once the deposit is paid.
What can a Michigan public body charge me?
MCL 15.234 limits fees to the actual incremental cost of the work, and it is one of the more prescriptive fee statutes in the country. Labor is charged at the hourly wage of the lowest paid employee capable of performing the task, whether or not that person actually does it, with a fringe-benefit add-on of not more than 50 percent. Paper copies are capped at 10 cents per sheet for standard letter or legal size sheets. Nonpaper media and mailing are charged at actual cost. If the total estimated fee exceeds $50, the public body may require a deposit of up to 50 percent before beginning work. Ask for a written itemized estimate before authorizing a large request. One more thing to check on the invoice: under MCL 15.234(9)(a) a public body that misses the response deadline in MCL 15.235(2) must cut the labor charges by 5 percent for each late day, to a maximum 50 percent reduction, if either the late response was willful and intentional or the request conveyed a request for information within the first 250 words of the body of the letter, fax or email, or carried words such as 'freedom of information,' 'information,' 'FOIA' or 'copy' on the front of the envelope or in the subject line. MCL 15.234(9)(b) then requires the reduction to be fully noted on the detailed itemization.
Is there a fee waiver in Michigan?
There are two, and one of them is mandatory rather than discretionary. MCL 15.234 requires a public body to waive the first $20.00 of the fee for an individual who is indigent and submits an affidavit of indigency, subject to limits including a cap of twice per calendar year from the same public body and eligibility restrictions. Separately, the statute permits a public body to conduct a search or furnish copies without charge or at a reduced charge if doing so is in the public interest. The indigency waiver is the more reliable of the two because it is written as an entitlement rather than a discretion, but it covers only the first $20.
How do I appeal a Michigan FOIA denial?
Michigan gives you an internal appeal before any court filing, and it is worth using because it is free and fast. You submit a written appeal to the head of the public body. Two formalities matter: the appeal must specifically use the word 'appeal' and it must state the reasons you believe the denial should be reversed. The head of the public body must respond within 10 business days, with one permitted extension of up to 10 additional business days. Alternatively, or after that appeal, you may file a civil action in circuit court, or in the Court of Claims for a state public body, within 180 days of the final denial.
What can a Michigan court award if I win?
MCL 15.240 provides for attorneys' fees and costs to a prevailing requester. Where the court finds the public body arbitrarily and capriciously violated the act by refusing or delaying disclosure, it may also assess a civil fine of $1,000 and punitive damages of $1,000. The 180-day filing window from the final denial is short compared with many states, so calendar it as soon as the denial or the appeal decision arrives.
Can I get Michigan police body camera video through FOIA?
Often not, and the controlling statute sits outside FOIA. The Law Enforcement Body-Worn Camera Privacy Act, Act 85 of 2017, provides at MCL 780.313(2) that a recording made by a law enforcement officer with a body-worn camera in a private place is exempt from disclosure under FOIA, subject to the exceptions in sections 4 and 5 of that act. Disclosure of any body-camera recording is also subject to crime victim protections under the Crime Victim's Rights Act. The practical consequences are that footage recorded in public spaces is not swept up by the private-place exemption, that the section 4 and 5 exceptions can open private-place footage in defined circumstances, and that a person depicted in a recording often has a stronger claim than a member of the general public. Ask the agency in writing which provision it is applying and whether any of the act's exceptions cover your situation.
Are Michigan birth and death certificates FOIA records?
No. Michigan vital records are issued by the Department of Health and Human Services Division of Vital Records and Health Statistics under separate eligibility rules based on your relationship to the person named, not through FOIA. See our guide to Michigan death records for who may order a certified copy.
Updates
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Michigan Compiled Laws
§ 15.233Public records; request requirements; right to inspect, copy, or receive; subscriptions; forwarding requests; file; inspection and examination; memoranda or abstracts; rules; compilation, summary, or report of information; creation of new public record; certified copiesIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) Except as expressly provided in section 13, upon providing a public body's FOIA coordinator with a written request that describes a public record sufficiently to enable the public body to find the public record, a person has a right to inspect, copy, or receive copies of the requested public record of the public body. A request from a person, other than an individual who qualifies as indigent under section 4(2)(a), must include the requesting person's complete name, address, and contact information, and, if the request is made by a person other than an individual, the complete name, address, and contact information of the person's agent who is an individual. An address must be written in compliance with United States Postal Service addressing standards. Contact information must include a valid telephone number or electronic mail address. A person has a right to subscribe to future issuances of public records that are created, issued, or disseminated on a regular basis. A subscription is valid for up to 6 months, at the request of the subscriber, and is renewable.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
Cited in 130 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Michigan courts read MCL 15.233(1) as setting a low bar for requests. Herald Co. v. City of Bay City (2000) held a request seeking information rather than specific documents was valid because it let the city find the records; Coblentz v. City of Novi (2006) held a description need only be sufficient, not precise or full.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Herald Co. v. City of Bay City (Michigan Supreme Court 2000, 463 Mich. 111)✓A newspaper asked Bay City for the names, job titles, cities of residence and ages of seven fire chief finalists; the court held section 15.233(1) does not require a requester to describe specific documents, so a request for information the city could locate was valid.
- Coblentz v. City of Novi (Michigan Supreme Court 2006, 475 Mich. 558)✓Residents asked Novi for settlement exhibits the agreement had marked INTENTIONAL DELETION; the court held section 15.233(1) asks only that a request describe a record sufficiently for the body to identify it, so the city had to produce them absent an exemption.
- Walen v. Department of Corrections (Michigan Supreme Court 1993, 443 Mich. 240)✓A prisoner asked to inspect final orders from prison disciplinary hearings; the court held FOIA reaches those hearings and remanded for the trial court to decide whether his section 15.233 request described the records sufficiently for the department to find them.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to Get a Police Report in Michigan (2026 Guide), Are Autopsy Reports Public in Michigan? (2026 Guide)
§ 15.235Request to inspect or receive copy of public record; response to request; failure to respond; damages; contents of notice denying request; signing notice of denial; notice extending period of response; action by requesting person; law enforcement records management system; alternate responsesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Except as provided in section 3, a person desiring to inspect or receive a copy of a public record shall make a written request for the public record to the FOIA coordinator of a public body. A written request made by facsimile, electronic mail, or other electronic transmission is not received by a public body's FOIA coordinator until 1 business day after the electronic transmission is made. However, if a written request is sent by electronic mail and delivered to the public body's spam or junk-mail folder, the request is not received until 1 day after the public body first becomes aware of the written request. The public body shall note in its records both the time a written request is delivered to its spam or junk-mail folder and the time the public body first becomes aware of that request. (2) Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the person making the request, a public body shall, subject to subsection (10), respond to a request for a public record within 5 business days after the public body receives the request by doing 1 of the following: (a) Granting the request. (b) Issuing a written notice to the requesting person denying the request.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
Cited in 70 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Federated Publications, Inc v. City of Lansing (Michigan Supreme Court 2002, 467 Mich. 98)“…the public body] for the public record . . . .”1 MCL 15.235(1). After receiving a FOIA request,…”
- Walen v. Department of Corrections (Michigan Supreme Court 1993, 443 Mich. 240)“…252 descriptive, the prisoner's request should be denied. MCL 15.235; MSA 4.1801(5). IV The Court of App…”
- King v. Michigan State Police Department (Michigan Court of Appeals 2013, 303 Mich. App. 162)“…to a request for a public record within five business days. MCL 15.235(2). The public body’s response must gra…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Public Records Laws by State: FOIA Guide for All 50 States (2026)
§ 15.234Fee; limitation on total fee; labor costs; establishment of procedures and guidelines; creation of written public summary; detailed itemization; availability of information on website; notification to requestor; deposit; failure to respond in timely manner; increased estimated fee deposit; deposit as fee; failure to pay or appeal deposit; request abandonedIn force
(1) A public body may charge a fee for a public record search, for the necessary copying of a public record for inspection, or for providing a copy of a public record if it has established, makes publicly available, and follows procedures and guidelines to implement this section as described in subsection (4). Subject to subsections (2), (3), (4), (5), and (9), the fee must be limited to actual mailing costs, and to the actual incremental cost of duplication or publication including labor, the cost of search, examination, review, and the deletion and separation of exempt from nonexempt information as provided in section 14. Except as otherwise provided in this act, if the public body estimates or charges a fee in accordance with this act, the total fee must not exceed the sum of the following components: (a) That portion of labor costs directly associated with the necessary searching for, locating, and examining of public records in conjunction with receiving and fulfilling a granted written request.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
Cited in 43 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Coblentz v. City of Novi (Michigan Supreme Court 2006, 475 Mich. 558)“…employee and concluded that the fees were appropriate under MCL 15.234. In the same order, the court denied pl…”
- King v. Michigan State Police Department (Michigan Court of Appeals 2013, 303 Mich. App. 162)“…essing fees paid by the Plaintiffs to Defendant pursuant to MCL 15.234. Plaintiffs have paid the amount of $11…”
- Kestenbaum v. Michigan State University (Michigan Supreme Court 1982, 414 Mich. 510)“…her disclosures would primarily benefit the general public. MCL 15.234(1); MSA 4.1801(4X1): "Copies of…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 15.240Options by requesting person; appeal; actions by public body; receipt of written appeal; judicial review; civil action; venue; de novo proceeding; burden of proof; private view of public record; contempt; assignment of action or appeal for hearing, trial, or argument; attorneys' fees, costs, and disbursements; assessment of award; damagesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) If a public body makes a final determination to deny all or a portion of a request, the requesting person may do 1 of the following at his or her option: (a) Submit to the head of the public body a written appeal that specifically states the word "appeal" and identifies the reason or reasons for reversal of the denial. (b) Commence a civil action in the circuit court, or if the decision of a state public body is at issue, the court of claims, to compel the public body's disclosure of the public records within 180 days after a public body's final determination to deny a request. (2) Within 10 business days after receiving a written appeal pursuant to subsection (1)(a), the head of a public body shall do 1 of the following: (a) Reverse the disclosure denial. (b) Issue a written notice to the requesting person upholding the disclosure denial. (c) Reverse the disclosure denial in part and issue a written notice to the requesting person upholding the disclosure denial in part. (d) Under unusual circumstances, issue a notice extending for not more than 10 business days the period during which the head of the public body shall respond to the written appeal.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
Cited in 174 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Coblentz v. City of Novi (Michigan Supreme Court 2006, 475 Mich. 558)“…ncy bears the burden of proving that an exemption applies. MCL 15.240(4). In this case, defendant did…”
- Herald Co. v. Eastern Michigan University Board of Regents (Michigan Supreme Court 2006, 475 Mich. 463)“…the burden to prove that its denial comports with the law. MCL 15.240(4). In this case, defendant is the go…”
- Federated Publications, Inc v. City of Lansing (Michigan Supreme Court 2002, 467 Mich. 98)“…clearly erroneous standard. Second, we hold that MCL 15.240(4) of the FOIA specifically places th…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 780.313Audio or video recording recorded by body-worn camera; disclosure; protections; exemption from freedom of information actIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(1) The disclosure of any audio or video recording recorded by a body-worn camera is subject to the protections provided for crime victims in sections 8, 19, 19a, 21, 34, 38, 48, 62, 68, and 80 of the William Van Regenmorter crime victim's rights act, 1985 PA 87, MCL 780.758, 780.769, 780.769a, 780.771, 780.784, 780.788, 780.798, 780.812, 780.818, and 780.830. (2) Except as otherwise provided in section 4 and subject to section 5, a recording recorded by a law enforcement officer with a body-worn camera that is recorded in a private place is exempt from disclosure under the freedom of information act, 1976 PA 442, MCL 15.231 to 15.246.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
Cross-referenced in the statute itself: § 15.231
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- 162373_134_01.Pdf (Michigan Supreme Court 2023)“…(overruling prior caselaw interpreting the 180-day rule in MCL 780.313 even though the defendant waived the is…”
- People of Michigan v. Dametrius Benjamin Posey (Michigan Supreme Court 2023)“…(overruling prior caselaw interpreting the 180-day rule in MCL 780.313 even though the defendant waived the is…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to Request Body Cam Footage: State Laws and the Request Process, Police Reports by State: How to Get a Copy, What They Cost, and What's Public
§ 15.232DefinitionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
As used in this act: (a) "Cybersecurity assessment" means an investigation undertaken by a person, governmental body, or other entity to identify vulnerabilities in cybersecurity plans. (b) "Cybersecurity incident" includes, but is not limited to, a computer network intrusion or attempted intrusion; a breach of primary computer network controls; unauthorized access to programs, data, or information contained in a computer system; or actions by a third party that materially affect component performance or, because of impact to component systems, prevent normal computer system activities. (c) "Cybersecurity plan" includes, but is not limited to, information about a person's information systems, network security, encryption, network mapping, access control, passwords, authentication practices, computer hardware or software, or response to cybersecurity incidents. (d) "Cybersecurity vulnerability" means a deficiency within computer hardware or software, or within a computer network or information system, that could be exploited by unauthorized parties for use against an individual computer user or a computer network or information system.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
Cited in 103 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of Education (Michigan Supreme Court 1997, 455 Mich. 285)“…[12] "Public body" means: "A ... school district...." MCL 15.232(b)(iii); MSA 4.1801(b)(iii). [13] "P…”
- Swickard v. Wayne County Medical Examiner (Michigan Supreme Court 1991, 438 Mich. 536)“…board, department, commission, council, or agency thereof. [MCL 15.232(b)(iii); MSA 4.1801(2)(b)(iii).]…”
- Walen v. Department of Corrections (Michigan Supreme Court 1993, 443 Mich. 240)“…3(1); MSA 4.1801(3)(1) requires a "public body," defined in MCL 15.232(b); MSA 4.1801(2)(b), to permit a perso…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 15.231Short title; public policyIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
(1) This act shall be known and may be cited as the "freedom of information act". (2) It is the public policy of this state that all persons, except those persons incarcerated in state or local correctional facilities, are entitled to full and complete information regarding the affairs of government and the official acts of those who represent them as public officials and public employees, consistent with this act. The people shall be informed so that they may fully participate in the democratic process.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
Cited in 386 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Booth Newspapers, Inc v. University of Michigan Board of Regents (Michigan Supreme Court 1993, 444 Mich. 211)“…SA 4.1800(11) et seq., or the Freedom of Information Act, MCL 15.231 et seq.; MSA 4.1801(1) et seq. We…”
- Herald Co. v. City of Bay City (Michigan Supreme Court 2000, 463 Mich. 111)“…that they may fully participate in the democratic process. [MCL 15.231(2); MSA 4.1801(1)(2) (emphasis added).]…”
- Coblentz v. City of Novi (Michigan Supreme Court 2006, 475 Mich. 558)“…m disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), MCL 15.231 et seq. We address also whether it was…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Michigan Laws on Recording Police: Your Rights and Legal Limits (2026), Michigan Data Privacy Laws: Consumer Rights & Protections (2026)
United States Code Title 5
§ 552Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedingsIn forcecited in 38 of our articles
Each agency shall make available to the public information as follows: Each agency shall separately state and currently publish in the Federal Register for the guidance of the public— descriptions of its central and field organization and the established places at which, the employees (and in the case of a uniformed service, the members) from whom, and the methods whereby, the public may obtain information, make submittals or requests, or obtain decisions; statements of the general course and method by which its functions are channeled and determined, including the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures available; rules of procedure, descriptions of forms available or the places at which forms may be obtained, and instructions as to the scope and contents of all papers, reports, or examinations; substantive rules of general applicability adopted as authorized by law, and statements of general policy or interpretations of general applicability formulated and adopted by the agency; and each amendment, revision, or repeal of the foregoing.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 11,434 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (1989) held categorically that releasing a private citizen's FBI rap sheet to a third party is an unwarranted privacy invasion under Exemption 7(C). Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. (1980) applied Exemption 3, 552(b)(3).
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society (Supreme Court of the United States 1975, 421 U.S. 240)“…Pub. L. 93-502, § 1 (b) (2), 88 Stat. 1561 (amending 5 U. S. C. § 552 (a)); Packers and Stockyards Act, 42…”
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1980, 447 U.S. 102)✓Consumer groups filed FOIA requests for accident reports manufacturers had given the CPSC as confidential; the Court held that the Consumer Product Safety Act's section 6(b)(1) applies to FOIA requests and that its standards fall within Exemption 3, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3).
- Taylor v. Sturgell (Supreme Court of the United States 2008, 553 U.S. 880)✓An aircraft enthusiast made a FOIA request for FAA records after a friend's identical suit failed; the Court disapproved preclusion by 'virtual representation' and read § 552(a)(3)(A) as directing agencies to release records to the requesting person, not the public at large.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to File a FOIA Request (Step by Step, 2026), Virginia Freedom of Information Act: Who Can Request and How (2026), West Virginia Freedom of Information Act: Requests and Fees (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Michigan Legislature: MCL 15.232, Freedom of Information Act definitions, including the exclusions from person and public body(legislature.mi.gov).gov
- Michigan Legislature: MCL 15.233, right to inspect, copy or receive copies of public records(legislature.mi.gov).gov
- Michigan Legislature: MCL 15.234, fees, deposits and the indigency waiver(legislature.mi.gov).gov
- Michigan Legislature: MCL 15.235, the 5 business day response requirement and extensions(legislature.mi.gov).gov
- Michigan Legislature: MCL 15.240, appeals, civil actions, attorneys' fees and punitive damages(legislature.mi.gov).gov
- Michigan Legislature: MCL 780.313, Law Enforcement Body-Worn Camera Privacy Act, private-place exemption(legislature.mi.gov).gov