Wage Theft in the U.S.: Your Rights Regardless of Immigration Status
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited September 26, 2026). · 25 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

As of September 2026, U.S. federal wage law protects workers regardless of immigration status. The Wage and Hour Division (WHD) of the Department of Labor says it enforces the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) without regard to whether an employee is documented or undocumented, and that its services are free and confidential for everyone.
If your employer did not pay you for hours you worked, you can claim that money. The Supreme Court's well-known Hoffman Plastic decision did not change that: it dealt with a different kind of payment under a different law. This page explains what the law says, how long you have to act, how to file a complaint, and what five states with large immigrant workforces say.
This page covers U.S. federal wage law (the FLSA), the Hoffman Plastic case and, as examples, the laws and agencies of California, New York, Texas, Illinois and Florida. It does not cover every state or local minimum wage ordinance. It is general information and is not a substitute for advice from a lawyer or legal aid organization about your situation.
Does federal wage law protect you if you are undocumented?
Yes. The WHD's Fact Sheet #48, revised July 2008, puts it this way:

The Department's Wage and Hour Division will continue to enforce the FLSA and MSPA without regard to whether an employee is documented or undocumented.
The WHD explains that under those laws, the claim is for pay for hours the employee actually worked, because the law requires payment for that work.
The WHD's page on information you need to file a complaint adds that all of its services are free and confidential, whether you are documented or not.
What the FLSA requires, in basic terms:
- Minimum wage. The federal minimum wage has been $7.25 an hour since July 24, 2009, under 29 U.S.C. § 206. Many states and cities set a higher minimum.
- Overtime. Under 29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1), a covered employee who works more than 40 hours in a workweek must be paid at least one and one-half times the regular rate for those hours. Our overtime calculator applies this federal rule, plus the state daily-overtime rules it models, to a set of hours worked and shows which hours qualify for the higher rate.
- What you can recover. Under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), an employer that violates those rules is liable for the unpaid minimum wages or overtime plus an equal additional amount as "liquidated damages." If the employer proves it acted in good faith and had reasonable grounds to believe it was not violating the FLSA, the court may reduce or deny the liquidated damages (29 U.S.C. § 260). If the worker wins the lawsuit, the court also awards a reasonable attorney's fee and costs against the employer.
Not every job is covered by the FLSA in the same way, and the law has exemptions. If you are not sure whether your job is covered, the WHD can help at no cost.
What the Hoffman Plastic case actually held (and what it did not)
Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002), is the case most often cited, and often miscited, for the idea that undocumented workers "have no rights." That is not what the Court decided.
The facts. Jose Castro was hired in 1988 at a chemical compounds plant after presenting the birth certificate of a friend born in Texas. In January 1989 the company laid him off, along with other workers, for supporting a union drive. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found the layoff violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and awarded him $66,951 in backpay, plus interest, for the time he did not work after the layoff.
What it held. The majority opinion, written by Chief Justice William Rehnquist, begins:
We hold that such relief is foreclosed by federal immigration policy, as expressed by Congress in the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA).
In other words, the Court held that the 1986 immigration law (IRCA) barred the NLRB from ordering that backpay to a worker who had never been legally authorized to work. The Court described the NLRB's request as backpay for years of work not performed. The decision was 5 to 4; Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the dissent.
What it did not hold:
- It did not address pay for hours already worked. The WHD explains in Fact Sheet #48 that the Court interpreted only one law, the NLRA, and did not address the FLSA or the MSPA. According to the WHD, the Court's concern about paying for work not performed does not apply to work actually performed.
- It did not let the employer off the hook. The opinion itself says that the lack of authority to award backpay does not mean the employer gets off scot-free: the NLRB's orders to cease and desist and to post a notice to employees about their rights stood, and the employer faced contempt proceedings if it did not comply.
- It did not say the NLRA stops protecting these workers. The opinion recalls that in an earlier case, Sure-Tan, Inc. v. NLRB (1984), the Court affirmed that the NLRA applies to undocumented workers.
One point that matters for your safety: the opinion notes that anyone who uses or attempts to use false documents to get work is subject to fines and criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1546(b). Nothing on this page suggests using false documents or lying to an agency or a court.
How long you have to file
Under the FLSA, the deadline is in 29 U.S.C. § 255(a): an action for unpaid minimum wages, overtime or liquidated damages must be commenced within 2 years after the violation, or within 3 years if the violation was willful. After that, the law says the claim is "forever barred."
29 U.S.C. § 256 defines when an action is commenced: the date the complaint is filed in court. In a collective action, for each worker it is the date that worker's written consent to join is filed in court.
That is why it pays to act early, even if only to ask for guidance. State deadlines are different and sometimes shorter (see the table below). Before either clock runs out, ask an employment lawyer for a free case evaluation on which federal or state deadline applies to your unpaid wages (attorney advertising).
How to file a complaint with the Wage and Hour Division (WHD)
The WHD takes complaints by phone, online or at a local office, according to its How to File a Complaint page (also in Spanish):
- Call 1-866-487-9243 (1-866-4-US-WAGE). You can also use the online contact form or visit the nearest WHD office.
- Have this information ready, according to the WHD's list: your name, address and phone number; the company's name, location and phone number; the manager's or owner's name; the type of work you did; and how and when you were paid (for example, cash or check, every Friday).
- Keep evidence. The WHD says copies of pay stubs, your own records of hours worked and any other information about how you were paid are helpful. Write down your start and end time every day.
Confidentiality. The WHD says the name of the complainant, the nature of the complaint and whether a complaint exists may not be disclosed.
Retaliation. The WHD says an employer cannot retaliate against a worker for exercising their rights, filing a complaint or cooperating with an investigation. The law prohibits it in 29 U.S.C. § 215(a)(3): it is unlawful to fire or in any other manner discriminate against an employee because the employee filed a complaint, started a proceeding or testified under the FLSA.
You can also file with your state's labor agency, where one exists and where state law gives you more protection. A complaint to an agency is not the same as a lawsuit in court, and each route has its own deadlines.
What some states say: California, New York, Texas, Illinois and Florida
Many states have wage laws more protective than the FLSA and their own agency for wage claims. This table shows five states with large immigrant workforces. It is not a list of every state; if you live elsewhere, look up your state's labor agency.

| State | Where to file | What it says about immigration status | Filing deadline | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California | Labor Commissioner's Office: online, by email, by mail or in person | The Labor Commissioner says California's labor laws protect all workers, regardless of immigration status. Cal. Lab. Code § 1171.5 says immigration status is irrelevant to the employer's liability | 3 years for minimum wage, overtime, breaks and illegal deductions; 2 years for an oral promise to pay more than minimum wage; 4 years for a written contract; 1 year for certain penalties | Labor Commissioner; Cal. Lab. Code § 1171.5 |
| New York | State Department of Labor (NYSDOL), form LS223 (LS710 for farm workers) | Your immigration status does not affect your right to file a complaint; NYSDOL says it does not report undocumented workers or witnesses to any state or federal enforcement agency | 6 years for a lawsuit under Article 6 of the Labor Law (§ 198(3)); a complaint to NYSDOL pauses that period while it is handled. NYSDOL says its investigations generally cover the period stated in the complaint or, in limited matters, 3 or more years. Questions: 888-525-2267 | NYSDOL: wage claim investigations; how to file; N.Y. Lab. Law § 198 |
| Texas | Texas Workforce Commission (TWC), under the Texas Payday Law: in person, by mail, by fax or electronically | The definition of "employee" in Tex. Lab. Code § 61.001(3) does not mention immigration status. TWC must make its notices available in the two languages most commonly spoken in the state | 180 days from when the wages were due; a late claim is dismissed | Tex. Lab. Code ch. 61 |
| Illinois | Illinois Department of Labor (IDOL) | IDOL says that in Illinois all workers have a right to be paid for the work they perform, regardless of immigration status | 1 year from when the wages were due, for complaints under the Wage Payment and Collection Act | IDOL; 820 ILCS 115/11 |
| Florida | For the state minimum wage (Fla. Const. art. X, § 24): a civil lawsuit, after written notice to the employer; the Attorney General may also sue | Neither article X, § 24 nor section 448.110 mentions immigration status; the FLSA and the WHD still apply in Florida | 4 years, or 5 years for a willful violation, under the Florida Constitution (art. X, § 24(e)). Section 448.110(8) refers to section 95.11, which sets the same periods for actions under section 448.110: 4 years, or 5 years for a willful violation (§ 95.11(3)(p) and (2)(d)) | Fla. Const. art. X, § 24; Fla. Stat. § 448.110; Fla. Stat. § 95.11 |
Some details from the table:
- California. Labor Code § 1171.5 says all protections, rights and remedies under state law are available to all individuals regardless of immigration status, with one exception: any reinstatement remedy prohibited by federal law. It also bars inquiry into immigration status in proceedings to enforce those laws unless the person seeking it shows by clear and convincing evidence that the inquiry is necessary to comply with federal immigration law. The Labor Commissioner offers a phone interpreter at 833-526-4636.
- New York. NYSDOL says an employer cannot justify not paying the minimum wage, overtime or benefits based on an employee's immigration status, or use that status to prevent a worker from filing a wage complaint. It asks you not to send original documents, only copies.
- Texas. The 180-day deadline in the Texas Payday Law (§ 61.051) is much shorter than the federal one, and the statute says it is a matter of jurisdiction: a late claim is dismissed. That deadline applies to a claim with TWC; the federal FLSA deadline is separate.
- Florida. The state minimum wage comes from the Florida Constitution, article X, § 24, which raises it to $15.00 an hour on September 30, 2026 and says actions to enforce it are subject to a limitations period of 4 years, or 5 years for willful violations. Before suing for unpaid minimum wages under state law, the worker must notify the employer in writing of the amount owed and the dates, and the employer has 15 days to pay, under § 448.110(6). The statute limits the Department of Commerce's authority to calculating and publishing the minimum wage, except as the Legislature expressly grants. The Attorney General may sue and seek a $1,000 fine for each willful violation.
Retaliation and immigration threats
Fear that the employer will call immigration is one of the most common reasons workers do not file. What the law says:
- Federal law. The FLSA prohibits firing or discriminating against an employee for filing a complaint (29 U.S.C. § 215(a)(3)). An employer that violates that rule is liable for relief that can include reinstatement, lost wages and an equal amount as liquidated damages (§ 216(b)). In its 2008 fact sheet, the WHD said it was still considering how Hoffman affects the anti-retaliation laws it enforces.
- California. Labor Code § 1019 prohibits threatening to contact, or contacting, immigration authorities to retaliate against someone for exercising labor rights. If it happens within 90 days after the worker exercised those rights, the law presumes it was retaliation unless the employer proves otherwise, and the worker can sue.
- Florida. Section 448.110(5) prohibits retaliation against anyone for exercising state minimum wage rights, including the right to file a complaint.
If your employer threatens you, write down the date, the time, the exact words and who was present. Before recording a conversation, check your state's consent rules in our guide to recording laws in the United States: in some states it is a crime to record without the permission of everyone in the conversation.
Deferred action for workers in labor disputes: the 2026 picture
For some years, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had a process for workers helping with a labor investigation to request deferred action, meaning the government would temporarily hold off on removal action against them. Labor agencies supported those requests with a "statement of interest."
As of September 2026, that process should not be counted on:
- USCIS archived its page on the process with a notice that the information is out of date.
- On May 8, 2026, USCIS issued Policy Alert PA-2026-01, which says that, unless mandated by law or regulation, deferred action is only considered on an individual case-by-case basis and is an extraordinary use of prosecutorial discretion.
Some state agencies, such as NYSDOL, still mention statements of interest. Before requesting one or relying on one, talk to an immigration lawyer or accredited representative. Your right to be paid wages you already earned does not depend on this process.
Where to find free, legitimate help
- WHD (federal): 1-866-487-9243, free and confidential, whether you are documented or not.
- Your state labor agency: the table above covers California, New York, Texas, Illinois and Florida.
- Immigration questions: the EOIR list of pro bono legal service providers, organized by state.
- Be wary of middlemen who charge to "fix" a claim or your papers. Read our guide to notario fraud.
If you left a job and did not get your last paycheck, see our guide to final paycheck laws by state. If you are worried about an immigration visit, read what to do if ICE comes to your door. All our guides on this topic are in the immigrant rights section.
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information about workers' wage rights in the United States regardless of immigration status, under federal law and the laws of California, New York, Texas, Illinois and Florida in effect in September 2026. It is not legal advice. For your situation, consult a lawyer licensed in your state, a legal aid organization or the relevant labor agency.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I claim unpaid wages if I am undocumented?
Yes. The Wage and Hour Division (WHD) of the Department of Labor says it enforces the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) without regard to whether a worker is documented or undocumented, and that its services are free and confidential for everyone. Under the FLSA the claim is for pay for hours you actually worked.
Does the Hoffman Plastic case mean undocumented workers have no labor rights?
No. In Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. NLRB (2002), the Supreme Court held that the National Labor Relations Board could not order backpay, for time not worked after an unlawful firing, to a worker who was never authorized to work. The WHD explains that the case interpreted only the National Labor Relations Act and did not address the FLSA or pay for hours already worked.
Will the WHD ask about my immigration status?
The WHD says all of its services are free and confidential, whether you are documented or not. To file a complaint it asks for information such as your name and contact details, the company's details, the type of work and how and when you were paid.
How long do I have to claim unpaid wages?
Under the FLSA, the lawsuit must be filed in court within 2 years of the violation, or within 3 years if it was willful (29 U.S.C. § 255). State deadlines differ: for example, in Texas a claim with the Texas Workforce Commission must be filed within 180 days, and in Illinois complaints to the Department of Labor under the Wage Payment and Collection Act within 1 year.
Can my employer fire me for complaining?
The FLSA makes it unlawful to fire or in any other manner discriminate against an employee because the employee filed a complaint or testified (29 U.S.C. § 215(a)(3)). If that happens, the employer is liable for relief that can include lost wages and an equal amount as liquidated damages, among other remedies. For workers without work authorization, the WHD said in 2008 that it was still considering how the Hoffman decision affects the anti-retaliation laws it enforces, and Hoffman barred backpay for time not worked after an unlawful firing, so lost wages after a firing may not be available. Talk to a lawyer or legal aid organization.
Is it illegal for my employer to threaten to call immigration if I claim my wages?
It depends on the state and the facts. In California, Labor Code § 1019 prohibits threatening to contact immigration authorities to retaliate against a worker for exercising labor rights. Under federal law, the FLSA prohibits discriminating against an employee for filing a complaint. Write down every threat with the date, time and witnesses.
Can I recover more than what I am owed?
Under the FLSA, an employer that did not pay minimum wage or overtime is liable for the unpaid amount plus an equal amount as liquidated damages, and if the worker wins the lawsuit, a reasonable attorney's fee and costs (29 U.S.C. § 216(b)). If the employer proves it acted in good faith and had reasonable grounds to believe it was not violating the FLSA, the court may reduce or deny the liquidated damages (29 U.S.C. § 260). The outcome depends on the facts of each case.
Does deferred action still exist for workers who report labor abuses?
It should not be counted on. USCIS archived its page on that process with a notice that the information is out of date, and its Policy Alert PA-2026-01, dated May 8, 2026, says deferred action is only considered case by case as an extraordinary use of prosecutorial discretion. Talk to an immigration lawyer or accredited representative before requesting it.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
California Labor Code
§ 1019In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) It is unlawful for an employer or any other person or entity to engage in, or to direct another person or entity to engage in, unfair immigration-related practices against any person for the purpose of, or with the intent of, retaliating against any person for exercising any right protected under this code or by any local ordinance applicable to employees. Exercising a right protected by this code or local ordinance includes the following: (1) Filing a complaint or informing any person of an employer’s or other party’s alleged violation of this code or local ordinance, so long as the complaint or disclosure is made in good faith. (2) Seeking information regarding whether an employer or other party is in compliance with this code or local ordinance. (3) Informing a person of his or her potential rights and remedies under this code or local ordinance, and assisting him or her in asserting those rights.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jose Yoni Aldana Hernandez v. C. R. Laurence, Co., Inc. (District Court, C.D. California 2024)“…retaliatory 7 unfair immigration-related practices under Cal. Lab. Code § 1019. (Dkt. No. 1-1.) 8 On May 9, 2024,…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Employer Threatening to Call Immigration? Your Rights in the U.S.
§ 1171.5In force
The Legislature finds and declares the following: (a) All protections, rights, and remedies available under state law, except any reinstatement remedy prohibited by federal law, are available to all individuals regardless of immigration status who have applied for employment, or who are or who have been employed, in this state. (b) For purposes of enforcing state labor, employment, civil rights, consumer protection, and housing laws, a person’s immigration status is irrelevant to the issue of liability, and in proceedings or discovery undertaken to enforce those state laws no inquiry shall be permitted into a person’s immigration status unless the person seeking to make this inquiry has shown by clear and convincing evidence that the inquiry is necessary in order to comply with federal immigration law. (c) The provisions of this section are declaratory of existing law. (d) The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Sullivan v. Oracle Corp. (California Supreme Court 2011, 51 Cal. 4th 1191)“…ent, or who are or who have been employed, in this state.” (Lab. Code, § 1171.5, subd. (a), added by Stats. 2002, ch. 1…”
- Salas v. Sierra Chemical Co. (California Supreme Court 2014, 59 Cal. 4th 407)“…ode section 7285, Health and Safety Code section 24000, and Labor Code section 1171.5. 2 Particularly pertinent here is Gove…”
- Manuel v. Super. Ct. (California Court of Appeal 2022)“…Manuel’s objection also cited Government Code section 7285, Labor Code section 1171.5, Code of Civil Procedure section 3339;…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Florida Statutes
§ 448.110State minimum wage; annual wage adjustment; enforcement.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) This section may be cited as the “Florida Minimum Wage Act.” (2) The purpose of this section is to provide measures appropriate for the implementation of s. 24, Art. X of the State Constitution, in accordance with authority granted to the Legislature pursuant to s. 24(f), Art. X of the State Constitution. To implement s. 24, Art. X of the State Constitution, the Department of Commerce is designated as the state Agency for Workforce Innovation. (3) Employers shall pay employees a minimum wage at an hourly rate of $6.15 for all hours worked in Florida. Only those individuals entitled to receive the federal minimum wage under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended, and its implementing regulations shall be eligible to receive the state minimum wage pursuant to s. 24, Art. X of the State Constitution and this section. The provisions of ss. 213 and 214 of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, as interpreted by applicable federal regulations and implemented by the Secretary of Labor, are incorporated herein.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
Cited in 48 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ultimate Makeover Salon & Spa, Inc. v. DiFrancesco (District Court of Appeal of Florida 2010, 41 So. 3d 335)“…ent of wages, in violation of the Florida Minimum Wage Act, section 448.110, Florida Statutes (2007). On December 17, 2007, pu…”
- Sawgrass Ford, Inc. v. Vargas (District Court of Appeal of Florida 2017, 214 So. 3d 691)“…tion based upon violations of the Florida Minimum Wage Act, section 448.110, Florida Statutes (2014), and alleging an individual clai…”
- Vladimir Mosia and MIG Express Corp. v. James Foglia (District Court of Appeal of Florida 2025)“…yer for violating the Florida Minimum Wage Act, codified in section 448.110, Florida Statutes (2023). The employee’s complaint allege…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Florida Minimum Wage 2026: $15.00 an Hour From September 30
§ 95.11Limitations other than for the recovery of real property.In forcecited in 16 of our articles
Actions other than for recovery of real property shall be commenced as follows:(1) WITHIN TWENTY YEARS.—An action on a judgment or decree of a court of record in this state. (2) WITHIN FIVE YEARS.—(a) An action on a judgment or decree of any court, not of record, of this state or any court of the United States, any other state or territory in the United States, or a foreign country. (b) A legal or equitable action on a contract, obligation, or liability founded on a written instrument, except for an action to enforce a claim against a payment bond, which shall be governed by the applicable provisions of paragraph (6)(e), s. 255.05(10), s. 337.18(1), or s. 713.23(1)(e), and except for an action for a deficiency judgment governed by paragraph (6)(g). (c) An action to foreclose a mortgage. (d) An action alleging a willful violation of s. 448.110. (e) Notwithstanding paragraph (b), an action for breach of a property insurance contract, with the period running from the date of loss. (3) WITHIN FOUR YEARS.—(a) An action relating to the determination of paternity, with the time running from the date the child reaches the age of majority.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
Cited in 698 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Merkle v. Robinson (1999) held that the significant relationship test governs conflict of law questions about section 95.11, so a claim time-barred in Florida may proceed under another state's period. Foley v. Morris (1976) applied a shortened 95.11 period to a pre-existing claim where the plaintiff still had the full new period.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Merkle v. Robinson (Supreme Court of Florida 1999, 737 So. 2d 540)✓A West Virginia patient sued a doctor's estate in Florida, where he had retired; her claim was untimely under Florida law but not West Virginia's. The court held the significant relationship test governs conflicts involving section 95.11, so West Virginia's period applied.
- Foley v. Morris (District Court of Appeal of Florida 1976, 325 So. 2d 37)✓A surgeon left a rubber drain in a patient in 1971; suit came in 1974, after Florida replaced the four-year period with the two-year medical malpractice period in section 95.11(6). The court applied the new period from its effective date and affirmed dismissal.
- State ex rel. Gerstein v. Hialeah Race Course, Inc. (Supreme Court of Florida 1971, 245 So. 2d 53)✓A state attorney sued racetrack operators over political contributions. Holding the campaign statute's four-year period unconstitutional as applied, the court ruled the general one-year limit in section 95.11(7)(a) governed, so the late complaint was properly dismissed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Florida Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Florida Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do, Florida Car Accident Laws: No-Fault, PIP, and Your Claim
New York Labor Law
§ 198Costs, remediesIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Costs, remedies. 1. In any action instituted upon a wage claim by an employee or the commissioner in which the employee prevails, the court may allow such employee in addition to ordinary costs, a reasonable sum, not exceeding fifty dollars for expenses which may be taxed as costs. No assignee of a wage claim, except the commissioner, shall be benefited by this provision. 1-a. On behalf of any employee paid less than the wage to which they are entitled under the provisions of this article, the commissioner may bring any legal action necessary, including administrative action, to collect such claim and as part of such legal action, in addition to any other remedies and penalties otherwise available under this article, the commissioner shall assess against the employer the full amount of any such underpayment, and an additional amount as liquidated damages, unless the employer proves a good faith basis for believing that its underpayment of wages was in compliance with the law.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislation.nysenate.gov
Cited in 520 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ryan v. Kellogg Partners Institutional Services (New York Court of Appeals 2012, 19 N.Y.3d 1)“…violation of the Labor Law and attorney’s fees pursuant to Labor Law § 198 (1-a). Kellogg challenged whether Ryan…”
- AHA Sales, Inc. v. Creative Bath Products, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 2008, 58 A.D.3d 6)“…well as by the Commissioner, are permissible. For instance, Labor Law § 198, pertaining to costs and remedies, prov…”
- Gottlieb v. Kenneth D. Laub & Co. (New York Court of Appeals 1993, 82 N.Y.2d 457)“…OPINION OF THE COURT Levine, J. Labor Law § 198 (1-a) provides in part that "[i]n any a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Final Paycheck Laws by State: Deadlines, Penalties, and PTO Payout Rules, New York Final Paycheck Laws: Regular Payday, Up to 300% in Damages
United States Code Title 18
§ 1546Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documentsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Whoever knowingly forges, counterfeits, alters, or falsely makes any immigrant or nonimmigrant visa, permit, border crossing card, alien registration receipt card, or other document prescribed by statute or regulation for entry into or as evidence of authorized stay or employment in the United States, or utters, uses, attempts to use, possesses, obtains, accepts, or receives any such visa, permit, border crossing card, alien registration receipt card, or other document prescribed by statute or regulation for entry into or as evidence of authorized stay or employment in the United States, knowing it to be forged, counterfeited, altered, or falsely made, or to have been procured by means of any false claim or statement, or to have been otherwise procured by fraud or unlawfully obtained; orWhoever, except under direction of the Attorney General or the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, or other proper officer, knowingly possesses any blank permit, or engraves, sells, brings into the United States, or has in his control or possession any plate in the likeness of a plate designed for the printing of permits, or makes any print, photograph, or impression in the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 904 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bizzie Walters v. Todd McMahen (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2012, 684 F.3d 435)“…plaint alleged that the hiring clerks individually violated 18 U.S.C. § 1546, which estab- lishes as a criminal offe…”
- Flores-Figueroa v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 2009, 556 U.S. 646)“…n, 8 U. S. C. §1325(a), and misusing immigration documents, 18 U. S. C. §1546(a). And it charged him with aggravated…”
- United States v. Posada-Rios (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1998, 158 F.3d 832)“…e statement on a visa application in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a) . . . . . . . . . . . .…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Traffic Stop Rights for Immigrants in the U.S. (2026)
United States Code Title 29
§ 206Minimum wageIn forcecited in 49 of our articles
Every employer shall pay to each of his employees who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, wages at the following rates: except as otherwise provided in this section, not less than— $5.85 an hour, beginning on the 60th day after May 25, 2007; $6.55 an hour, beginning 12 months after that 60th day; and $7.25 an hour, beginning 24 months after that 60th day; if such employee is a home worker in Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands, not less than the minimum piece rate prescribed by regulation or order; or, if no such minimum piece rate is in effect, any piece rate adopted by such employer which shall yield, to the proportion or class of employees prescribed by regulation or order, not less than the applicable minimum hourly wage rate. Such minimum piece rates or employer piece rates shall be commensurate with, and shall be paid in lieu of, the minimum hourly wage rate applicable under the provisions of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 6,250 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mark D. Tourscher v. Martin Horn, Secretary of the Pa. Dept. Of Corrections John McCullough Superintendent ,(d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00176j) (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1999, 184 F.3d 236)“…wage provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 206 (a), for the work he was compelled to d…”
- Christensen v. Harris County (Supreme Court of the United States 2000, 529 U.S. 576)“…in the private sector of the economy or the public sector. 29 U. S. C. §§ 206 , 207 (1994 ed. and Supp. III). In 1985…”
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1981, 450 U.S. 728)“…a minimum wage under § 6 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U. S. C. § 206 , may not be waived through a collectiv…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Ohio Debt Collection Laws: Garnishment Formula, the 6-Year Consumer Debt Rule, and Repossession, Federal Minimum Wage 2026: $7.25 an Hour Since 2009, Minimum Wage by State 2026: All 50 States and DC
§ 207Maximum hoursIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided in this section, no employer shall employ any of his employees who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, for a workweek longer than forty hours unless such employee receives compensation for his employment in excess of the hours above specified at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rate at which he is employed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 6,331 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Christensen v. Harris County (Supreme Court of the United States 2000, 529 U.S. 576)“…tory time at a rate of 1½ hours for every hour worked. See 29 U. S. C. § 207 ( o )(1). To provide this form of comp…”
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1981, 450 U.S. 728)“…wing rates . . . ." It provided in § 7 (a) (2) of the Act, 29 U. S. C. § 207 (a) (2), that "no employer shall emplo…”
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority (Supreme Court of the United States 1985, 469 U.S. 528)“…States and localities with respect to these positions. See 29 U. S. C. § 207 (k). Congress also declined to impose a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: The 2024 Overtime Rule Is Officially Dead: Courts Vacated It and the DOL Restored the $35,568 Salary Threshold
§ 215Prohibited acts; prima facie evidenceIn forcecited in 33 of our articles
After the expiration of one hundred and twenty days from June 25, 1938, it shall be unlawful for any person— to transport, offer for transportation, ship, deliver, or sell in commerce, or to ship, deliver, or sell with knowledge that shipment or delivery or sale thereof in commerce is intended, any goods in the production of which any employee was employed in violation of section 206 or section 207 of this title, or in violation of any regulation or order of the Secretary issued under section 214 of this title; except that no provision of this chapter shall impose any liability upon any common carrier for the transportation in commerce in the regular course of its business of any goods not produced by such common carrier, and no provision of this chapter shall excuse any common carrier from its obligation to accept any goods for transportation; and except that any such transportation, offer, shipment, delivery, or sale of such goods by a purchaser who acquired them in good faith in reliance on written assurance from the producer that the goods were produced in compliance with the requirements of this chapter, and who acquired such goods for value without notice of any such…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,632 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., Defendants (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 1979, 600 F.2d 1003)“…available under the FLSA. A relevant starting point may be 29 U.S.C. § 215 (a)(3), which prohibits the retaliatory…”
- United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. (Supreme Court of the United States 1952, 344 U.S. 218)“…1060 , *219 1068-1069, as amended, 63 Stat. 910 , 919, 29 U. S. C. §§ 215 , 216 (a), charging the defendant corpo…”
- Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1960, 361 U.S. 288)“…he three employees in violation of § 15 (a)(3) of the Act, 29 U. S. C. § 215 (a)(3), and' praying for an. order enj…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Federal Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report, Alabama Minimum Wage 2026: $7.25 Federal, No State Rate, Connecticut Minimum Wage 2026: $16.94 an Hour ($17.48 in 2027)
§ 216PenaltiesIn forcecited in 46 of our articles
Any person who willfully violates any of the provisions of section 215 of this title shall upon conviction thereof be subject to a fine of not more than $10,000, or to imprisonment for not more than six months, or both. No person shall be imprisoned under this subsection except for an offense committed after the conviction of such person for a prior offense under this subsection. Any employer who violates the provisions of section 206 or section 207 of this title shall be liable to the employee or employees affected in the amount of their unpaid minimum wages, or their unpaid overtime compensation, as the case may be, and in an additional equal amount as liquidated damages. Any employer who violates the provisions of section 215(a)(3) or 218d of this title shall be liable for such legal or equitable relief as may be appropriate to effectuate the purposes of section 215(a)(3) or 218d of this title, including without limitation employment, reinstatement, promotion, and the payment of wages lost and an additional equal amount as liquidated damages.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 9,526 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):The Supreme Court treats Section 216(b) as the FLSA's private-suit clause. Alden v. Maine (1999) held Article I gives Congress no power to subject nonconsenting states to such private damages suits in their own courts. Christensen v. Harris County (2000) applied Section 216(b)'s requirement that plaintiffs prove a Section 207 violation.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society (Supreme Court of the United States 1975, 421 U.S. 240)“…abor Standards Act, § 16 (b), 52 Stat. 1069 , as amended, 29 U. S. C. § 216 (b); Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers…”
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper (Supreme Court of the United States 1980, 447 U.S. 752)“…ther taxable costs. Compare 42 U. S. C. § 2000a-3 (b) with 29 U. S. C. § 216 (b) (1970 ed., Supp. V).” Id., at 6…”
- Hutto v. Finney (Supreme Court of the United States 1979, 437 U.S. 678)“…ther taxable costs. Compare 42 U. S. C. § 2000a-3 (b) with 29 U. S. C. § 216 (b) (1970 ed., Supp. V). [29] See…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Unpaid Wages: How to File a Claim and Recover What You're Owed, Independent Contractor vs. Employee: The IRS, DOL and ABC Tests, Alaska Minimum Wage 2026: $14.00 an Hour, $15.00 in July 2027
§ 255Statute of limitationsIn forcecited in 39 of our articles
Any action commenced on or after May 14, 1947, to enforce any cause of action for unpaid minimum wages, unpaid overtime compensation, or liquidated damages, under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended [29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], the Walsh-Healey Act, or the Bacon-Davis Act 1 See References in Text note below. — if the cause of action accrues on or after May 14, 1947 —may be commenced within two years after the cause of action accrued, and every such action shall be forever barred unless commenced within two years after the cause of action accrued, except that a cause of action arising out of a willful violation may be commenced within three years after the cause of action accrued; if the cause of action accrued prior to May 14, 1947 —may be commenced within whichever of the following periods is the shorter: (1) two years after the cause of action accrued, or (2) the period prescribed by the applicable State statute of limitations; and, except as provided in paragraph (c), every such action shall be forever barred unless commenced within the shorter of such two periods; if the cause of action accrued prior to May 14, 1947, the action shall not be barred by paragraph (b)…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,924 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents (Supreme Court of the United States 2000, 528 U.S. 62)“…added to the statute of limitations provision of the FLSA, 29 U. S. C. § 255 , a new subsection (d), which suspended…”
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Evans (Supreme Court of the United States 1979, 441 U.S. 750)“…title shall apply to actions under this chapter." Title 29 U. S. C. § 255 provides in relevant part: "Any acti…”
- Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don Schupak (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 1993, 991 F.2d 583)“…o a more generous three-year statute of limitations. See 29 U.S.C. § 255 (a) (1988) (three-year statute of limit…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Minimum Wage 2026: $11.00 an Hour, Tip Credit Rules, Colorado Minimum Wage 2026: $15.16, $15.71 in 2027, Georgia Minimum Wage 2026: $7.25 Federal, $5.15 State Rate
§ 256Determination of commencement of future actionsIn force
In determining when an action is commenced for the purposes of section 255 of this title, an action commenced on or after May 14, 1947 under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended [29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], the Walsh-Healey Act, or the Bacon-Davis Act,1 See References in Text note below. shall be considered to be commenced on the date when the complaint is filed; except that in the case of a collective or class action instituted under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, or the Bacon-Davis Act,1 it shall be considered to be commenced in the case of any individual claimant— on the date when the complaint is filed, if he is specifically named as a party plaintiff in the complaint and his written consent to become a party plaintiff is filed on such date in the court in which the action is brought; or if such written consent was not so filed or if his name did not so appear—on the subsequent date on which such written consent is filed in the court in which the action was commenced.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 510 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Grayson v. K Mart Corp. (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 1996, 79 F.3d 1086)“…(b) of the FLSA, that ADEA opt-in plaintiffs should, under 29 U.S.C. § 256 (a) of the FLSA, 38 be deemed to comme…”
- Daniel Campbell v. City of Los Angeles (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2018, 903 F.3d 1090)“…the date her opt-in form is filed with the district court. 29 U.S.C. § 256. From that point on, there is no statuto…”
- Morelock v. NCR Corp. (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 1978, 586 F.2d 1096)“…a party plaintiff in the lawsuit, under the provisions of 29 U.S.C. § 256 . 2 *1099 The appeal was argued bef…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 260Liquidated damagesIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
In any action commenced prior to or on or after May 14, 1947 to recover unpaid minimum wages, unpaid overtime compensation, or liquidated damages, under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended [29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], if the employer shows to the satisfaction of the court that the act or omission giving rise to such action was in good faith and that he had reasonable grounds for believing that his act or omission was not a violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, the court may, in its sound discretion, award no liquidated damages or award any amount thereof not to exceed the amount specified in section 216 of this title.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,231 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., Defendants (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 1979, 600 F.2d 1003)“…een amended by Section 11 of the Portal-to-Portal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 260 . Defendants argue that Section 11 ther…”
- National Automatic Laundry and Cleaning Council v. George P. Shultz, Secretary, U. S. Department of Labor (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1971, 443 F.2d 689)“…ges by reason of § 11 of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 260 , which gives the court discretion to d…”
- Bruce Barcellona, Cross-Appellants v. Tiffany English Pub, Inc., D/B/A Tgi Friday's, Cross-Appellee (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1979, 597 F.2d 464)“…quidated damages. Section 11 of the Portal-to-Portal Act, 29 U.S.C. § 260 , permits the judge to deny liquidated…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- U.S. Department of Labor, WHD Fact Sheet #48: Application of U.S. Labor Laws to Immigrant Workers (rev. July 2008)(dol.gov).gov
- U.S. Department of Labor, WHD: Information You Need to File a Complaint(dol.gov).gov
- U.S. Department of Labor, WHD: How to File a Complaint(dol.gov).gov
- U.S. Department of Labor, WHD: Federal Minimum Wage(dol.gov).gov
- 29 U.S.C. § 206 (FLSA minimum wage)(govinfo.gov).gov
- 29 U.S.C. § 207 (FLSA overtime)(govinfo.gov).gov
- 29 U.S.C. § 216 (FLSA damages and right of action)(govinfo.gov).gov
- 29 U.S.C. § 260 (FLSA good-faith defense to liquidated damages)(govinfo.gov).gov
- Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002), U.S. Supreme Court(courtlistener.com)
- 29 U.S.C. § 255 (FLSA statute of limitations)(govinfo.gov).gov
- 29 U.S.C. § 256 (when an action is commenced)(govinfo.gov).gov
- U.S. Department of Labor, WHD: How to File a Complaint (Spanish)(dol.gov).gov
- 29 U.S.C. § 215(a)(3) (FLSA anti-retaliation)(govinfo.gov).gov
- California Labor Commissioner: How to File a Wage Claim(dir.ca.gov).gov
- Cal. Lab. Code § 1171.5 (rights regardless of immigration status)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- New York State Department of Labor: What to Expect from a Labor Standards Wage Claim Investigation(dol.ny.gov).gov
- New York State Department of Labor: File a Labor Standards Wage Theft Claim(dol.ny.gov).gov
- N.Y. Labor Law § 198 (costs, remedies and 6-year limitations period)(nysenate.gov).gov
- Tex. Lab. Code ch. 61 (Texas Payday Law), §§ 61.001, 61.006, 61.051, 61.052(tcss.legis.texas.gov).gov
- Illinois Department of Labor: File a Workplace Complaint(labor.illinois.gov).gov
- 820 ILCS 115/11 (Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act)(ilga.gov).gov
- Florida Constitution, Art. X, § 24 (Florida minimum wage)(flsenate.gov).gov
- Fla. Stat. § 448.110 (Florida minimum wage)(leg.state.fl.us)
- Fla. Stat. § 95.11 (limitations periods)(leg.state.fl.us)
- Cal. Lab. Code § 1019 (unfair immigration-related practices)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- USCIS: DHS Support of the Enforcement of Labor and Employment Laws (archived page)(uscis.gov).gov
- USCIS Policy Alert PA-2026-01: Deferred Action as an Extraordinary Use of Prosecutorial Discretion (May 8, 2026)(uscis.gov).gov
- EOIR: List of Pro Bono Legal Service Providers(justice.gov).gov
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.