Ohio
Ohio Debt Collection Laws: Garnishment Formula, the 6-Year Consumer Debt Rule, and Repossession
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 12, 2026). · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

No collector can take money out of an Ohio paycheck on the strength of a phone call or a threatening letter. For ordinary consumer debt, an Ohio creditor must first sue you, win a judgment, and then obtain a garnishment order from the court before your employer withholds a cent. Most garnishments trace back to default judgments entered because nobody answered the lawsuit, which makes answering the summons the single most valuable step an Ohio debtor can take. The other half of the picture is just as important: once a creditor does have a judgment, Ohio's protections are thinner than many neighboring states, because Ohio ties its wage floor to the federal minimum wage rather than its own higher one, and shields only $625 in a bank account.
How Much of Your Paycheck Can Be Garnished in Ohio
Ohio's wage exemption, ORC 2329.66(A)(13), protects the greater of two amounts each pay period: 75 percent of your disposable earnings, or a multiplier of the federal minimum wage (30 times the federal hourly minimum if paid weekly, 60 times if biweekly, 65 times if semimonthly, 130 times if monthly). Put the other way around, a judgment creditor can take up to 25 percent of disposable earnings, but never so much that your remaining pay drops below the wage-multiplier floor.
The detail that separates Ohio from many states: the statute expressly pegs that multiplier to the federal minimum hourly wage under 29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1), currently $7.25, not Ohio's higher state minimum wage. So the weekly floor is 30 x $7.25 = $217.50. States like Washington, Illinois, and New York compute similar floors from their own higher wage rates, producing floors two or three times higher. In Ohio, a worker earning above roughly $290 in weekly disposable pay is exposed to the full 25 percent.
Disposable earnings means pay left after legally required deductions such as taxes and Social Security. Voluntary deductions like health insurance or a 401(k) contribution do not reduce the garnishable base. Support withholding runs under a different, higher set of ceilings (50 to 65 percent of disposable earnings under federal law) and is a separate regime from judgment garnishment; see Ohio child support laws.
Before any of that starts, Ohio puts a mandatory warning step in front of a wage garnishment, and it is the cheapest point in the whole process to act. Under ORC 2716.02, a judgment creditor must serve a statutory-form written demand headed "Notice of Court Proceeding to Collect Debt" at least 15 days and not more than 45 days before it asks the court for the order, by personal service through the court, by certified mail with return receipt, or by regular mail evidenced by a certificate of mailing. The notice spells out three ways to avoid the garnishment within 15 days: pay the amount demanded, return the attached "Payment to Avoid Garnishment" form with a payment large enough to prevent the garnishment, or apply to your municipal or county court for the appointment of a trustee to receive the non-exempt part of your earnings. ORC 2716.03(A)(3) and (A)(4) then require the affidavit that commences the garnishment to state that this demand was made and went unsatisfied, so a garnishment sought without it is open to challenge.
One feature that surprises people: Ohio garnishment orders are continuous. Under ORC 2716.041, an order against personal earnings keeps withholding from every pay period until the judgment plus interest and costs is satisfied. There is no need for the creditor to refile each month.
Ohio's exemption statute contains no head-of-household or dependent-based enhancement. Unlike Florida or Texas, supporting a family does not change the formula. The dollar figures in ORC 2329.66 are adjusted for inflation every third year under ORC 2329.66(B), most recently on April 1, 2025. The adjustment is published by the Ohio Judicial Conference in the Register of Ohio and the codified text is never renumbered, so the amounts printed in the statute are stale base figures rather than the amounts actually in force. Always check the current memorandum before relying on a number you read in the code.
Bank Accounts: The $625 Problem
Ohio protects only $625 of "cash on hand, money due and payable, tax refunds, and money on deposit" from execution, under ORC 2329.66(A)(3). Be careful reading the statute itself here: the codified text of that subsection still says four hundred dollars, because Ohio never rewrites the printed figures. That $400 is the un-adjusted base. The operative amount, set by the Ohio Judicial Conference under ORC 2329.66(B), is $625 for judgments and orders from April 1, 2025 through March 31, 2028. The same adjustment puts the homestead exemption at $182,625 and the motor vehicle exemption at $5,025. Everything above that in an ordinary account is reachable by a judgment creditor with a bank garnishment. Ohio wages that were protected in your employer's hands enjoy no special traced protection in the account beyond what the exemption categories provide.
The meaningful shields for deposited money are categorical. ORC 2329.66(A)(9) and (10) exempt workers' compensation, unemployment compensation, Ohio Works First assistance, earned income tax credit and child tax credit payments, and a broad set of pensions, IRAs, Roth IRAs, 529 and ABLE accounts. Directly deposited federal benefits (Social Security, VA, and similar) carry the automatic federal two-month protection under 31 CFR Part 212 on top of that; see Can Social Security be garnished?.
Can You Be Fired Over a Garnishment?
Ohio's rule, ORC 2716.05, mirrors the federal one: no employer may discharge an employee solely because of a successful garnishment by only one judgment creditor in any twelve-month period. That word "solely" does real work. An employer that has any other stated ground for the firing sits outside the prohibition, so the section is narrower than it first sounds. Once a second creditor garnishes within the same year, the statutory protection runs out, which matches the federal one-indebtedness rule in 15 U.S.C. 1674 rather than the broader protections some states provide. Like the repossession sections below, this rests on a verbatim official-text corpus capture rather than a live open of codes.ohio.gov during this research session, so confirm the current text before relying on it in a specific case.

State Tax Debts Work Differently, but Not Bigger
Unpaid Ohio taxes that go delinquent are certified to the Ohio Attorney General for collection. The important number: wage garnishment for certified state debts is capped by the same formula as an ordinary civil judgment, the lesser of 25 percent of disposable earnings or the amount above the 30-times-federal-minimum-wage floor. Ohio does not give its tax collectors an elevated percentage the way the IRS's federal levy tables can reach deeper. The IRS itself, and federal administrative garnishment for defaulted federal student loans at 15 percent of disposable pay, operate under federal law and are unaffected by Ohio's rules.
The Statute of Limitations on Debt in Ohio
Ohio rewrote its limitations law in 2021 (Senate Bill 13, effective June 16, 2021), and the current structure has a twist that most summaries miss:
- Written contracts: 6 years under ORC 2305.06 (shortened from 8 by SB 13).
- Oral contracts: 4 years under ORC 2305.07(A) as the general rule.
- Consumer transactions: 6 years regardless of form. ORC 2305.07(C) creates a carve-out that overrides both rules above for any obligation arising from a consumer transaction, one incurred primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, "whether or not reduced to writing." The claim accrues 30 calendar days after the date of the last charge or last payment, whichever is later.
That consumer-transaction rule is the one that governs most real-world collection lawsuits. Credit cards, medical bills, personal loans, and retail installment debts are consumer transactions, so the practical answer for most Ohio consumer debt is 6 years from 30 days after your last charge or payment, and the old written-versus-oral characterization fight rarely matters anymore.
Other periods: promissory notes payable at a definite time get 6 years under ORC 1303.16, and contracts for the sale of goods get 4 years under ORC 1302.98.
Revival: under ORC 2305.08, a partial payment on the debt, or a signed written acknowledgment or promise to pay, restarts a fresh limitations period from that date. A small payment on an old Ohio debt can therefore give a collector six more years to sue. Think carefully, and consider advice, before paying anything on a debt that may be near or past its limitations date.
Two federal points complete the picture. Suing, or threatening to sue, on a time-barred debt is a violation of Regulation F (12 CFR 1006.26) no matter what the collector knew. And time-barred is not erased: collectors may still request payment, and the separate seven-year credit reporting clock runs on its own schedule. The full state-by-state table is in our statute of limitations on debt guide.
Medical Debt: The Proposed Ban Is Not Law
You may have seen coverage of the Ohio Medical Debt Fairness Act, House Bill 257, which as introduced would ban wage garnishment for medical debt, cap medical debt interest at 3 percent, and bar credit reporting of medical debt. As of this writing it remains a pending bill in committee, not law. Today, a medical judgment garnishes like any other consumer judgment in Ohio. One further caveat: multiple 2026 news reports describe a House Health Committee amendment that would delete the blanket wage-garnishment ban and replace it with a narrower 10-percent-of-wages cap after 120 consecutive days of missed payment. That reported amendment could not be independently verified against the bill's current text this session, so it is not asserted as fact here, but it means the bill's substance may already differ from its as-introduced description. Check the bill's current text on legislature.ohio.gov before relying on specifics.

Car Repossession and Cure Rights
A note on sourcing: Ohio's official statute website could not be re-opened during this review, so the repossession details below reflect the most recent official code text available to us, captured in July 2026. The section numbers are stable, but confirm current text before acting on a specific repossession.
Ohio follows the standard UCC self-help rule (ORC 1309.609): after default, a secured lender may repossess without a court order, but only without a breach of the peace. Ohio then layers on unusually strong consumer protections through its Retail Installment Sales Act for covered consumer transactions:
- Post-repossession cure right (ORC 1317.12). Within 5 business days after taking the collateral, the creditor must send a notice itemizing the default and the exact amount required to cure. The borrower may then cure within 20 days after the repossession or 15 days after the notice, whichever is later, by paying the past-due installments, delinquency charges, limited retaking expenses, and a deposit of two installments as security. Cure once, and you get the property back. The right can be used only once per debt.
- The sanction has teeth. A secured party that disposes of the collateral without sending the required notice cannot recover repossession costs and is not entitled to any deficiency judgment.
- Late-loan repossession bar (ORC 1317.13). For covered consumer collateral, a secured party may not take possession at all if, at the time of default, the remaining time balance is less than 25 percent of the sum of two figures: the time balance on the day the retail installment contract was executed, plus the down payment recited in that contract. Counting against the original time balance alone, as many summaries do, sets the trigger point too low. Motor vehicles, manufactured homes, and mobile homes are excluded from this bar.
- Public sale requirements (ORC 1317.16). Covered dispositions must be by public sale, with at least 10 days' certified-mail notice to the debtor stating the time, place, and minimum price, plus newspaper publication.
Which financing contracts fall inside the Retail Installment Sales Act versus the plain UCC rules is a scope question that depends on how the loan was made, so treat these as rights to ask a lawyer about rather than certainties. The national baseline is covered in car repossession laws.
If You Are Being Garnished or Sued in Ohio
Do not let the lawsuit default. An answer forces the plaintiff, often a debt buyer several assignments removed from the original creditor, to prove it owns the debt and that the amount is right, and it preserves the six-year limitations defense, which is lost if never raised. If what arrived is the pre-garnishment "Notice of Court Proceeding to Collect Debt" rather than a garnishment order, you have not been garnished yet and the 15-day window described above is still open. If a garnishment is already running, check the math against the 75 percent and $217.50 floors, claim your exemptions for any bank levy quickly, and ask the court about a hearing if the calculation looks wrong. If multiple judgments are stacking, bankruptcy's automatic stay halts garnishment while the case is open, and Ohio debtors use both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 for exactly this situation; see Ohio bankruptcy law. None of this is a promise about any individual outcome; it is the process the law provides.
Overwhelmed by debt? Get a free bankruptcy consultation
Bankruptcy can stop foreclosure, wage garnishment, and creditor calls, and which debts you can clear and what property you keep depend on your state's exemptions. Get a free, confidential consultation with a bankruptcy attorney to understand your options. There is no obligation.
Information last verified on 2026-08-12. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.

Related Resources
- Debt Collection Laws by State
- Statute of Limitations on Debt
- How to Stop Wage Garnishment
- Car Repossession Laws
- Ohio Bankruptcy
- Ohio Child Support Laws
Last updated: 2026-08-12.
More Ohio Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How much of my paycheck can be garnished in Ohio?
Up to 25 percent of disposable earnings, but never enough to leave you with less than 30 times the federal minimum wage per week, currently $217.50. Ohio ties this floor to the federal wage, not the higher Ohio minimum wage.
How long does an Ohio wage garnishment last?
Until the judgment is paid. Under ORC 2716.041 an order against personal earnings is continuous, withholding from every pay period until the judgment plus interest and costs is satisfied.
What is the statute of limitations on credit card debt in Ohio?
Six years for most consumer debt under ORC 2305.07(C), which applies to consumer transactions whether or not they were in writing, with accrual 30 days after the last charge or payment. This carve-out was added in 2021 by Senate Bill 13.
Does a partial payment restart the clock on old debt in Ohio?
Yes. Under ORC 2305.08, a payment on the debt, or a signed written acknowledgment or promise to pay, starts a fresh limitations period from that date.
How much money in my bank account is protected from garnishment in Ohio?
Only $625 under the general exemption in ORC 2329.66(A)(3), the inflation-adjusted amount in force from April 1, 2025 through March 31, 2028. The codified text of that subsection still reads $400, which is the un-adjusted base rather than the operative figure. Larger protections exist for specific categories such as retirement accounts, workers' compensation, unemployment, and directly deposited federal benefits, which carry an automatic two-month federal shield.
Did Ohio ban garnishment for medical debt?
No. House Bill 257 would ban wage garnishment for medical debt, but it is a pending bill, not law. Medical judgments currently garnish under the same rules as other consumer judgments.
Can I get my car back after repossession in Ohio?
For financing covered by Ohio's Retail Installment Sales Act, yes, once: the lender must send a cure notice within 5 business days, and you may reinstate by paying the itemized cure amount within 20 days of the repossession or 15 days of the notice, whichever is later. A lender that skips the notice loses its right to a deficiency judgment.
Updates
Corrected the Ohio cash and bank-deposit exemption to the inflation-adjusted $625 in force through March 31, 2028 (the statute still prints the un-adjusted $400 base), added the ORC 2716.02 pre-garnishment notice that gives debtors a 15-day window to act, and tightened the repossession-bar and anti-discharge summaries to match the enacted text.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Ohio Revised Code
§ 2329.66Exempted interests and rightsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(A) Every person who is domiciled in this state may hold property exempt from execution, garnishment, attachment, or sale to satisfy a judgment or order, as follows: (1)(a) In the case of a judgment or order regarding money owed for health care services rendered or health care supplies provided to…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 451 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Daugherty v. Central Trust Co. (1986) held exempt personal earnings keep that status once deposited in a checking account if traceable, but are not protected from a bank's self-help setoff. State ex rel. Davis v. Turner (Slip Opinion) (2021) held the exemptions apply on execution, not to vacate a costs judgment.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Daugherty v. Central Trust Co. (Ohio Supreme Court 1986, 28 Ohio St. 3d 441)✓A bank set off funds from a checking account holding only exempt wages against the depositor's matured debt; the Ohio Supreme Court held exempt earnings keep their exemption once deposited if traceable, but Section 2329.66 does not reach a bank's common law setoff.
- State v. Taylor (Slip Opinion) (Ohio Supreme Court 2020, 161 Ohio St. 3d 319)✓A man serving 36 years to life sought waiver of court costs, citing $19 a month in prison wages; the Ohio Supreme Court rejected his constitutional argument, reasoning in part that Section 2329.66 lets him exempt a minimum set of assets like any civil debtor.
- State ex rel. Davis v. Turner (Slip Opinion) (Ohio Supreme Court 2021, 164 Ohio St. 3d 395)✓An inmate assessed $136.95 in court costs claimed the funds in his prison account were exempt under Section 2329.66(A)(3); the Ohio Supreme Court held the exemption bears on executing a judgment, not on liability, and gives no basis for vacating the cost assessment.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy in Ohio (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
§ 2305.07Contract not in writing; statutory liability; consumer transactionsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(A) Except as provided in sections 126.301 and 1302.98 of the Revised Code, an action upon a contract not in writing, express or implied, shall be brought within four years after the cause of action accrued.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 384 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp. (Ohio Supreme Court 1984, 12 Ohio St. 3d 179)“…ract so as to invoke the six-year statute of limitations of R.C. 2305.07. 2 For the reasons that follow, this c…”
- Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. McKinley (Ohio Supreme Court 2011, 130 Ohio St. 3d 156)“…e subject to the six-year statute of limitations of R.C. 2305.07. (No. 2010-0720—Submitted March 2, 2…”
- Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Management Co. (Ohio Supreme Court 1994, 70 Ohio St. 3d 281)“…R.C. 4112.99 does not contain a statute of limitations. R.C. 2305.07 provides a six-year limitations period…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Ohio Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type, Debt Collection Laws by State: Garnishment, SOL, and Repossession Rules
§ 2716.041Order of garnishment of personal earnings to be continuousIn force
(A) When a municipal court, county court, or court of common pleas issues an order of garnishment of personal earnings following a judgment creditor's filing of an affidavit in accordance with section 2716.03 of the Revised Code and the judgment creditor's compliance with section 2716.04 of the…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Complete Credit Solutions, Inc. v. Kellam (Ohio Court of Appeals 2013, 2013 Ohio 5324)“…iod until the judgment, interest, and costs have been paid. R.C. 2716.041(B). An…”
- Shaffer v. Jones (Ohio Court of Appeals 2017, 2017 Ohio 7730)“…nors’ and Schaffer’s—was subject to a stacking order under R.C. 2716.041(D). According to the statute, each part…”
- Tisdale v. ADP, L.L.C. (Ohio Court of Appeals 2021, 2021 Ohio 3827)“…[I.] ADP, LLC. acted on three instances against R.C. 2716.041 [II.] ADP, LLC. confi…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2305.08Partial paymentIn force
If payment has been made upon any demand founded on a contract, or a written acknowledgment thereof, or a promise to pay it has been made and signed by the party to be charged, an action may be brought thereon within the time limited by sections 2305.06 and 2305.07 of the Revised Code, after such…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Slack v. Cropper (Ohio Court of Appeals 2001, 143 Ohio App. 3d 74)“…05.07 and extends the running of the statute as provided in R.C. 2305.08. Similarly, in this case, appell…”
- Mohammad v. Awadallah (Ohio Court of Appeals 2012, 2012 Ohio 3455)“…that the “partial payment rule” found in contract law, see R.C. 2305.08, should be applicable to negotiable ins…”
- State v. Taylor (Ohio Court of Appeals 2023, 215 N.E.3d 657)“…se of discretion and so forth) and the type of review that R.C. 2305.08(G)(2) imposes, which is evidentiary (c…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2305.06Contract in writingIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Except as provided in sections 126.301, 1302.98, 1303.16, 1345.10, and 2305.04 of the Revised Code, an action upon a specialty or an agreement, contract, or promise in writing shall be brought within six years after the cause of action accrued. Last updated April 13, 2021 at 3:03 PM
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 289 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Schwartz v. Bank One, Portsmouth, N.A. (Ohio Court of Appeals 1992, 84 Ohio App. 3d 806)“…tute of limitations for a written contract must govern. See R.C. 2305.06. 2 Appellee argues the…”
- Rayess v. Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (Ohio Supreme Court 2012, 134 Ohio St. 3d 509)“…134 Ohio St.3d 509, 2012-Ohio-5676.] R.C. 2305.06—An informational pamphlet describing th…”
- Sarmiento v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co. (Ohio Supreme Court 2005, 106 Ohio St. 3d 403)“…ar statute of limitations for contract actions set forth in R.C. 2305.06. But the agreed-upon reduced time perio…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1317.12Default - notice, curingIn force
Notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary in a retail installment contract made on or after the effective date of this section, if collateral for a consumer transaction is taken possession of by the secured party on default, the secured party shall, within five business days after taking…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 31 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Potts (Ohio Supreme Court 1989, 47 Ohio St. 3d 97)“…ide involves two questions. First, as a matter of law, does R.C. 1317.12, 1317.16 or 1309.47 require a secured c…”
- Huntington National Bank v. Elkins (Ohio Court of Appeals 1987, 43 Ohio App. 3d 64)“…plaintiff was bound to adhere to the notice requirements of R.C. 1317.12 and 1317.16. RISA mandates that,…”
- Huntington Bank v. Freeman (Ohio Court of Appeals 1989, 53 Ohio App. 3d 127)“…held that banks are exempt from the notice requirements of R.C. 1317.12 under the definition of “consumer trans…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1317.13Time balanceIn force
As used in this section, "motor vehicle" and "mobile home" have the same meanings as in section 4501.01 of the Revised Code, and "manufactured home" has the same meaning as in section 3781.06 of the Revised Code.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
§ 1317.16Disposition of collateralIn force
(A) A secured party whose security interest is taken pursuant to section 1317.071 of the Revised Code may, after default, dispose of any or all of the collateral only as authorized by this section. (B) Disposition of the collateral shall be by public sale only.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 27 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Potts (Ohio Supreme Court 1989, 47 Ohio St. 3d 97)“…I must respectfully dissent due to the explicit language of R.C. 1317.16(B)'. That statute provides in part: “*…”
- daimler/chrysler Truck Financial v. Kimball, 2007-Ca-07 (12-14-2007) (Ohio Court of Appeals 2007, 2007 Ohio 6678)“…r Chrysler had been granted a security interest by Kimball. R.C. 1317.16 , the section of the RISA on which Daim…”
- Huntington National Bank v. Elkins (Ohio Court of Appeals 1987, 43 Ohio App. 3d 64)“…held liable for any deficiency, must be sent to the debtor. R.C. 1317.16. This notice may be combined with the R…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1309.609Secured party's right to take possession after default - UCC 9-609In force
(A) After default, a secured party: (1) May take possession of the collateral; and (2) Without removal, may render equipment unusable and dispose of collateral on a debtor's premises under section 1309.610 of the Revised Code.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Ryan (Ohio Court of Appeals 2010, 189 Ohio App. 3d 560)“…vehicle.” In Ohio, this right to repossession is subject to R.C. 1309.609, which provides: (A) After default, a…”
- Kemba Financial Credit Union v. Fish, Unpublished Decision (1-9-2007) (Ohio Court of Appeals 2007, 2007 Ohio 43)“…Kemba's agent tainted the actual repossession and violated R.C. 1309.609 for breaching the peace is an unreason…”
- Tidewater Finance Co. v. Curry (In Re Curry) (Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit 2006, 347 B.R. 596)“…ted on her obligations under the Contract. See Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 1309.609. The Debtor then had the option of rede…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1303.16Statute of limitations - UCC 3-118In force
(A) Except as provided in division (E) of this section, an action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay a note payable at a definite time shall be brought within six years after the due date or dates stated in the note or, if a due date is accelerated, within six years after the accelerated…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 66 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bank of New York Mellon v. Walker (Ohio Court of Appeals 2017, 2017 Ohio 535)“…ial court erred in finding the statute of limitations under R.C. 1303.16(A) did not apply to the foreclosure of…”
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. O'Malley (Ohio Court of Appeals 2019, 2019 Ohio 5340)“…y 14, 2017. The magistrate’s decision found R.C. 1303.16(A)’s six-year statute of limitations b…”
- SMS Fin. 30, L. L.C. v. Frederick D. Harris, M.D., Inc. (Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County 2018, 2018 Ohio 2064)“…le instrument and that the action was not time-barred under R.C. 1303.16 because the LOC was accelerated on May…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1302.98Statute of limitations in contracts for sale - UCC 2-725In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(A) An action for breach of any contract for sale must be commenced within four years after the cause of action has accrued. By the original agreement the parties may reduce the period of limitation to not less than one year but may not extend it.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 130 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co. v. Muething (Ohio Supreme Court 1992, 65 Ohio St. 3d 273)“…limitations set forth in the Ohio Uniform Commercial Code, R.C. 1302.98 (UCC 2-725). Muething urges this court…”
- Westfield Insurance v. Huls America, Inc. (Ohio Court of Appeals 1998, 128 Ohio App. 3d 270)“…re not time-barred. The four-year statute of limitations of R.C. 1302.98(A) governs claims for property damage w…”
- Allis-Chalmers Credit Corp. v. Herbolt (Ohio Court of Appeals 1984, 17 Ohio App. 3d 230)“…ged that appellant’s claims were barred by the operation of R.C. 1302.98 1 (U.C.C. 2-725), which pr…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2716.05Service of order and notices on garnisheeIn force
The garnishee shall be served, in the same manner as a summons is served, with three copies of the order of garnishment of personal earnings and of a written notice that the garnishee answer as provided in division (E) of section 2716.041 of the Revised Code, this section, and section 2716.21 of…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at codes.ohio.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2017
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Lough v. Robinson (Ohio Court of Appeals 1996, 111 Ohio App. 3d 149)“…ent law is preempted by the Consumer Credit Protection Act. R.C. 2716.05 5 directs the employer to…”
- St. Ann's Hospital v. Arnold (Ohio Court of Appeals 1996, 109 Ohio App. 3d 562)“…laintiffs motion for leave to file a wage garnishment under R.C. 2716.05. Upon appeal, plaintiff asserts three a…”
- Columbus Check Cashers, Inc. v. Cary (Ohio Court of Appeals 2011, 196 Ohio App. 3d 132)“…journal entry thereof.” (Emphasis added.) {¶ 22} Further, R.C. 2716.05, regarding garnishment of personal earn…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 29
§ 206Minimum wageIn force
Every employer shall pay to each of his employees who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, wages at the following rates: except as otherwise provided in this section, not less than— $5.85 an hour, beginning on the 60th day after May 25, 2007; $6.55 an hour, beginning 12 months after that 60th day; and $7.25 an hour, beginning 24 months after that 60th day; if such employee is a home worker in Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands, not less than the minimum piece rate prescribed by regulation or order; or, if no such minimum piece rate is in effect, any piece rate adopted by such employer which shall yield, to the proportion or class of employees prescribed by regulation or order, not less than the applicable minimum hourly wage rate. Such minimum piece rates or employer piece rates shall be commensurate with, and shall be paid in lieu of, the minimum hourly wage rate applicable under the provisions of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 6,250 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mark D. Tourscher v. Martin Horn, Secretary of the Pa. Dept. Of Corrections John McCullough Superintendent ,(d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00176j) (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1999, 184 F.3d 236)“…wage provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 206 (a), for the work he was compelled to d…”
- Christensen v. Harris County (Supreme Court of the United States 2000, 529 U.S. 576)“…in the private sector of the economy or the public sector. 29 U. S. C. §§ 206 , 207 (1994 ed. and Supp. III). In 1985…”
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1981, 450 U.S. 728)“…a minimum wage under § 6 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U. S. C. § 206 , may not be waived through a collectiv…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 15
§ 1674Restriction on discharge from employment by reason of garnishmentIn forcecited in 15 of our articles
No employer may discharge any employee by reason of the fact that his earnings have been subjected to garnishment for any one indebtedness. Whoever willfully violates subsection (a) of this section shall be fined not more than $1,000, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 48 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Federal appeals courts have held that 15 U.S.C. 1674 gives no private right of action to an employee fired over a garnishment. Smith v. Cotton Brothers Baking Co., Inc. (1980) found no implied civil remedy, and Le Vick v. Skaggs Companies, Inc. (1983) agreed, leaving enforcement to the Secretary of Labor under Section 1676.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- James E. Le Vick v. Skaggs Companies, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 1983, 701 F.2d 777)✓An employee fired after his wages were garnished sued his employer under 15 U.S.C. 1674(a); the Ninth Circuit declined to follow its own Stewart precedent and held Congress created no private right of action, leaving enforcement to the Secretary of Labor.
- Hodgson v. Cleveland Municipal Court (District Court, N.D. Ohio 1971, 326 F. Supp. 419)✓The Secretary of Labor argued federal garnishment law preempted Ohio's narrower anti-discharge provision; the court found no showing that 15 U.S.C. 1674, a self-enforcing criminal section, was frustrated by the Ohio statute, and no justiciable controversy under it.
- Reginald O. Wallace v. Debron Corporation (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 1974, 494 F.2d 674)✓A Black welder was fired under a rule barring two garnishments in a year; reversing summary judgment on his Title VII disparate-impact claim, the Eighth Circuit read 15 U.S.C. 1674 as preventing discharge for one indebtedness, not authorizing it for others.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Georgia Debt Collection Laws: Garnishment Caps, the 10-Day Repo Notice, and Debt Time Limits, Alabama Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Code of Federal Regulations Title 12
§ 1006.26Collection of time-barred debts.In forcecited in 37 of our articles
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section: (1) Statute of limitations means the period prescribed by applicable law for bringing a legal action against the consumer to collect a debt. (2) Time-barred debt means a debt for which the applicable statute of limitations has expired. (b) Legal actions and threats of legal actions prohibited. A debt collector must not bring or threaten to bring a legal action against a consumer to collect a time-barred debt. This paragraph (b) does not apply to proofs of claim filed in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (2024) dismissed FDCPA claims built on 12 CFR 1006.26(b), reasoning it bars only collection of time-barred debts and the loans at issue were not time barred. Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (2025) dismissed a Regulation F claim because nonjudicial foreclosure is not covered by the FDCPA.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2024)✓A borrower claimed a servicer's letter and billing statement lacked language required by 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court granted the servicer summary judgment, since the rule only bars collecting time-barred debts and it had already found her HELOC and mortgage enforceable.
- Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2025)✓Pro se homeowners alleged a servicer and foreclosure attorneys pursued a time-barred, discharged second mortgage in violation of 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court dismissed that claim, holding parties carrying out a nonjudicial foreclosure are not FDCPA debt collectors.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Debt Collection Laws: Garnishment Limits, Debt Deadlines, and Repossession, Maine Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Michigan Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Ohio Rev. Code Section 2329.66, Exempted Interests and Rights(codes.ohio.gov).gov
- Ohio Rev. Code Section 2716.041, Continuous Order of Garnishment of Personal Earnings(codes.ohio.gov).gov
- Ohio Rev. Code Section 2305.06, Contract in Writing (Six-Year Limitation)(codes.ohio.gov).gov
- Ohio Rev. Code Section 2305.07, Contract Not in Writing; Consumer Transaction(codes.ohio.gov).gov
- Ohio Rev. Code Section 2305.08, Partial Payment or Written Acknowledgment(codes.ohio.gov).gov
- Ohio Rev. Code Section 1317.12, Notice of Default; Right to Cure (Retail Installment Sales)(codes.ohio.gov).gov
- Ohio Rev. Code Section 2716.05, No Discharge from Employment for a Single Creditor's Garnishment(codes.ohio.gov).gov
- Ohio Attorney General Collections Enforcement, Payment Program FAQs (Wage Garnishment Limits)(ohiopayments.com)
- U.S. Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Ohio Exemption Increases Effective April 1, 2025 (ORC 2329.66 inflation adjustment)(ohsb.uscourts.gov)
- Ohio Rev. Code Section 2716.02, Form for Notice of Court Proceeding to Collect Debt(codes.ohio.gov)
- Ohio Rev. Code Section 2716.03, Commencing Proceeding for Garnishment of Personal Earnings(codes.ohio.gov)
- Ohio Rev. Code Section 1317.13, Time Balance (Repossession Bar)(codes.ohio.gov)