South Carolina
South Carolina GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited June 17, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. How we verify our legal content
South Carolina never passed a law regulating who may put a GPS tracker or an AirTag on someone else's car. The phrase "tracking device" does appear in the code, but only in S.C. Code 17-30-140, which sets out how law enforcement gets a court order to use one. Nothing in the code speaks to private tracking. That does not make secret tracking legal.
Instead, South Carolina prosecutors reach for the harassment and stalking statutes, which ban "following" a person and keeping them under "surveillance." A hidden GPS unit on someone's car fits that language better than most people expect. This guide walks through how the law actually works, who can track a vehicle legally, and how South Carolina's unusual carve-out for licensed private investigators works.
Is It Legal to Put a GPS Tracker on a Car in South Carolina?
It depends on whose car it is and why you are tracking it. Putting a GPS device on your own vehicle is legal. Putting one on someone else's vehicle without their knowledge is where the trouble starts.
Because South Carolina has no statute regulating private use of tracking devices, there is no single bright-line rule that says "placing a tracker on another person's car is a crime." Instead, the question becomes whether your tracking behavior amounts to harassment or stalking under S.C. Code Title 16, Chapter 3, Article 17. In practice, secretly tracking an ex, a spouse, or anyone else over time almost always checks those boxes.
The state-of-mind element matters. A single, isolated act is usually not enough, because the statutes require a pattern. But a GPS tracker is never really a single act. It reports the victim's location over and over, day after day, which is exactly the kind of repeated conduct the harassment law was built to punish.
No Private-Tracking Statute: Harassment and Stalking Fill the Gap (16-3-1700)
S.C. Code 16-3-1700(A) defines harassment in the first degree as a pattern of intentional, substantial, and unreasonable intrusion into someone's private life that causes mental or emotional distress. The statute then lists examples of what that intrusion can look like, and two of them map directly onto GPS tracking.
The first is "following the targeted person as he moves from location to location." A GPS tracker is electronic following. It does precisely what a tail car would do, just more efficiently and around the clock.
The second is "surveillance of or the maintenance of a presence near" the targeted person's home, workplace, school, or other place they visit. A device that reports when someone arrives at and leaves their house or office is surveillance in the plainest sense of the word. Neither GPS units nor AirTags are named anywhere in the harassment statute, but conduct of that kind fits the statutory language directly, and the section says its examples are illustrative, not exhaustive.
One step up from harassment sits stalking, which is defined in S.C. Code 16-3-1700(C) and punished under S.C. Code 16-3-1730. Stalking is a pattern of words or conduct that serves no legitimate purpose and is intended to cause, and reasonably would cause, the victim to fear death, assault, bodily injury, kidnapping, or property damage. When GPS tracking is part of a broader campaign of intimidation, the charge escalates from harassment to stalking, and the penalties jump with it.
The Private Investigator Exemption (16-3-1700(G))
Here is what makes South Carolina genuinely distinctive. Section 16-3-1700(G) lists conduct that the harassment and stalking provisions do not apply to. Alongside constitutionally protected activity, law enforcement officers, and process servers performing official duties, the legislature carved out licensed private investigators.
![]()
The exemption covers a PI "performing services or an investigation as described in detail in a contract signed by the client and the private investigator pursuant to Section 40-18-70."
Read closely, though, subsection (G) says only that "this section does not apply." It removes liability under the harassment and stalking definitions, and nothing more. It does not authorize trespassing onto private property to reach a vehicle, it does not authorize tampering with a car the client does not own, and it does not bar a civil suit for wrongful intrusion into private affairs. An investigator who bolts a tracker to a stranger's car is still exposed on each of those fronts.
Many states leave PIs in a legal gray zone or limit them to vehicles the client owns, so an express statutory carve-out like South Carolina's is unusual. Private investigators here are licensed and regulated by the State Law Enforcement Division (SLED), so the carve-out only protects investigators who hold a valid license and stay within the scope of the signed contract.
The exemption is not a loophole for ordinary people. Hiring yourself as your own "investigator" does not work, and an unlicensed person who tracks someone for pay commits both the underlying offense and a licensing violation.
Who CAN Legally Track a Vehicle in South Carolina
Some tracking is clearly lawful. The common categories look like this.
Your own vehicle. You can put a GPS unit on a car titled in your name, including anti-theft trackers and devices that monitor a teen driver. If a spouse co-owns the car, ownership gives you a strong defense, although using the data to intimidate or follow your spouse can still support a harassment charge.
Fleet and business vehicles. Companies routinely track vehicles they own. South Carolina has no statute restricting employer GPS tracking of company property.
Parents and guardians. Tracking your minor child's phone or the family car is lawful. Courts treat parental monitoring of minors as a legitimate purpose.
Licensed private investigators. As covered above, PIs operating under a signed client contract have an express exemption in 16-3-1700(G). It lifts harassment and stalking liability only, not trespass, tampering, or civil exposure.
Law enforcement with a court order. S.C. Code 17-30-140 is the one place the code addresses tracking devices by name. It lets the Attorney General or a solicitor apply to a judge for an ex parte order authorizing installation and use of a mobile tracking device on a certification of probable cause, and subsection (E) expressly adopts "the standards established by the United States Supreme Court for the installation and monitoring of mobile tracking devices." That folds in United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), where the Court treated the physical installation of a GPS tracker on a vehicle as a Fourth Amendment search, so police generally need a warrant before planting one.
Lenders and lienholders. Vehicles financed through buy-here-pay-here dealers often come with disclosed GPS units tied to the loan agreement. Consent in the contract is what makes those lawful.
Can My Employer Track My Car in South Carolina?
South Carolina has no statute addressing employer GPS tracking, so the default rules apply. If the vehicle belongs to the company, the employer can track it, on or off the clock, because the employer owns the asset.
Your personal vehicle is different. An employer who hides a tracker on an employee's private car without consent has no ownership defense and risks the same harassment exposure as anyone else, plus a civil wrongful-intrusion claim. Employers who want location data from personal vehicles used for work should get written consent, typically through a mileage-tracking app the employee installs voluntarily.
If your job involves driving and you want to understand the related camera and audio rules, see our guide to South Carolina recording laws.
AirTags and Item Trackers
Apple AirTags, Tiles, and similar Bluetooth trackers are treated no differently than a wired GPS unit under South Carolina law. The harassment statute looks at the conduct, following and surveillance, not the technology.
![]()
Dropping an AirTag in someone's bag or magnet-mounting one in a wheel well is the same legal act as bolting on a $200 GPS tracker. Apple and Google now push unwanted-tracker alerts to nearby phones, which is how many South Carolina victims discover the device in the first place. Those phone alerts, plus a police report, become the core evidence in a harassment prosecution.
Using an AirTag to find your own stolen property is lawful. The line is tracking a person who has not consented.
Penalties for Illegal GPS Tracking in South Carolina
Because tracking is charged under the harassment and stalking statutes, the penalty depends on the degree of the offense and your record.
| Offense | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Harassment, second degree (defined 16-3-1700(B), penalty 16-3-1710) | Misdemeanor | 30 days in jail and $200 fine |
| Harassment, second degree, with a prior conviction within 10 years or while a restraining order is in effect | Misdemeanor | 1 year and $1,000 |
| Harassment, first degree (defined 16-3-1700(A), penalty 16-3-1720) | Misdemeanor | 3 years and $1,000 |
| Harassment, first degree, with a prior harassment or stalking conviction within 10 years | Felony | 5 years and $5,000 |
| Stalking (defined 16-3-1700(C), penalty 16-3-1730) | Felony | 5 years and $5,000 |
| Stalking while an injunction or restraining order is in effect | Felony | 10 years and $7,000 |
| Stalking with a prior stalking or harassment conviction within 10 years | Felony | 15 years and $10,000 |
Federal law can stack on top. 18 U.S.C. 2261A, the federal stalking statute, covers using "any interactive computer service or electronic communication service or electronic communication system" to engage in a course of conduct that causes substantial emotional distress or fear, and it applies when the stalker crosses state lines or the tracking spans states.
Civil Options and Restraining Orders
Criminal charges are not the only remedy. South Carolina recognizes the tort of wrongful intrusion into private affairs, the state's version of intrusion upon seclusion. A victim of covert GPS tracking can sue the tracker for damages, and the secrecy of the device usually makes the "intrusion would be highly offensive" element easy to prove.
For faster protection, S.C. Code 16-3-1750 gives magistrates court jurisdiction over an action for a restraining order against a person engaged in harassment or stalking, and lets any person file the complaint and motion. Venue is the county where the defendant lives, where the conduct happened, or where the plaintiff lives if the defendant is a nonresident or cannot be found.
The emergency mechanism sits in the next section. Under S.C. Code 16-3-1760(A), within twenty-four hours after the complaint is filed the court may hold an emergency hearing and, for good cause, issue a temporary restraining order without giving the defendant notice. A prima facie showing of present danger of bodily injury, verified by supporting affidavits, counts as good cause. Violating the order then exposes the tracker to the enhanced penalties in the table above.
Our South Carolina restraining order guide covers the filing process, and the GPS Tracking Laws by State hub compares how other states handle the same problem. If the surveillance involves cameras rather than location data, see our surveillance camera laws guide.
What to Do If You Find a Tracker on Your Car
Stay calm and think about evidence before you act.
![]()
- Photograph the device in place before touching it. Location and mounting method matter to investigators.
- Do not destroy it. The tracker is evidence, and it may carry fingerprints or a serial number that identifies the buyer.
- Call local police or the sheriff's office and ask them to document and remove it. Mention S.C. Code 16-3-1700 if the officer is unsure what statute applies.
- Save phone alerts. If your iPhone or Android flagged an unknown AirTag traveling with you, screenshot the alert and its history.
- Consider a restraining order. If you know or suspect who placed it, file the complaint in magistrate court under 16-3-1750. The emergency route in 16-3-1760 lets the court hold a hearing within twenty-four hours of filing and issue a temporary order without notice to the defendant when there is a present danger of bodily injury, and an order in effect stiffens the penalties for continued tracking.
- Talk to a lawyer about a civil claim if the tracking caused real harm, since wrongful-intrusion damages are separate from any criminal case.
If you are in danger, the National Domestic Violence Hotline (1-800-799-7233) can help you plan around a tracker without tipping off the person monitoring you.
Sources
- S.C. Code of Laws Title 16, Chapter 3, Article 17 (Sections 16-3-1700 to 16-3-1790): Harassment, Stalking, and Restraining Orders
- S.C. Code of Laws Section 17-30-140: Mobile Tracking Devices (law enforcement court orders)
- S.C. Code of Laws Title 40, Chapter 18: Private Security and Investigation Agencies (Section 40-18-70)
- South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED), licensing authority for private investigators
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), slip opinion
- 18 U.S.C. 2261A: Federal Stalking Statute
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and provides general information about GPS tracking laws in South Carolina as of June 2026. It is not legal advice. Laws change, and how they apply depends on your specific facts. If you are dealing with unwanted tracking or facing charges, consult a licensed South Carolina attorney.
More South Carolina Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal to put a GPS tracker on someone's car in South Carolina?
There is no statute regulating private tracking, but secretly tracking another person's car is prosecuted as harassment or stalking under S.C. Code 16-3-1700 through 16-3-1730. The harassment statute expressly covers following a person from location to location and keeping surveillance on their home, work, or school, which is exactly what a hidden tracker does.
Can I put a tracker on my spouse's car in South Carolina?
If the car is titled in your name or jointly titled, ownership gives you a strong defense for installing the device. If the car belongs solely to your spouse, secret tracking can support a harassment charge, and even on a co-owned car, using the data to follow or intimidate your spouse can cross the line. Family court judges also react badly to covert tracking in divorce cases.
Can a private investigator legally track a car in South Carolina?
S.C. Code 16-3-1700(G) exempts licensed private investigators performing services under a contract signed by the client, as described in the licensing law at 40-18-70, from the harassment and stalking provisions. The investigator must hold a valid SLED license and stay within the contract's scope. The exemption is narrow: it lifts harassment and stalking liability only, and does not authorize trespass or tampering or bar a civil wrongful-intrusion claim.
Are AirTags illegal in South Carolina?
Owning and using an AirTag to track your own keys, luggage, or vehicle is legal. Planting one on a person or their belongings without consent is treated the same as any other covert tracking and can be charged as harassment or stalking.
What is the penalty for tracking someone in South Carolina?
Harassment in the second degree carries up to 30 days in jail. Harassment in the first degree, which covers following and surveillance, carries up to 3 years, or 5 years as a felony with a qualifying prior conviction. Stalking is a felony with up to 5 years and a $5,000 fine, rising to 10 years and a $7,000 fine if a restraining order was in effect and 15 years and a $10,000 fine with a prior conviction within 10 years.
Can my employer put a GPS tracker on my personal car in South Carolina?
Not without your consent. South Carolina has no employer tracking statute, but an employer has no ownership interest in your personal vehicle, so hiding a tracker on it risks harassment liability and a civil wrongful-intrusion claim. Tracking company-owned vehicles, by contrast, is lawful.
Do South Carolina police need a warrant to use a GPS tracker?
Generally yes. S.C. Code 17-30-140 requires the Attorney General or a solicitor to apply to a judge for an order authorizing a mobile tracking device, supported by a certification of probable cause, and subsection (E) adopts the U.S. Supreme Court's standards for installation and monitoring. In United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), the Court held that physically installing a GPS device on a vehicle to monitor its movements is a Fourth Amendment search, so law enforcement typically must obtain a warrant first.
How do I get a restraining order against someone tracking me in South Carolina?
File a complaint and motion with the magistrate court under S.C. Code 16-3-1750, in the county where the defendant lives, where the harassment occurred, or where you live if the defendant is a nonresident or cannot be found. Bring your evidence, such as photos of the device, tracker alerts from your phone, and the police report. Under S.C. Code 16-3-1760, the court may hold an emergency hearing within twenty-four hours of filing and issue a temporary restraining order without notice to the defendant on a verified showing of present danger of bodily injury.
Updates
Corrected the statutory citations on this page: stalking is defined in S.C. Code 16-3-1700(C) rather than 16-3-1730, the emergency 24-hour restraining order is issued under 16-3-1760 rather than 16-3-1750, the law enforcement mobile tracking device provision at 17-30-140 was added, the private investigator exemption in 16-3-1700(G) is now described in its actual narrow scope, and an unsupported claim about past South Carolina prosecutions was removed.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 16: CRIMES AND OFFENSES
§ 16-3-1700DefinitionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
As used in this article: (A) "Harassment in the first degree" means a pattern of intentional, substantial, and unreasonable intrusion into the private life of a targeted person that serves no legitimate purpose and causes the person and would cause a reasonable person in his position to suffer mental or emotional distress. Harassment in the first degree may include, but is not limited to: (1) following the targeted person as he moves from location to location; (2) visual or physical contact that is initiated, maintained, or repeated after a person has been provided oral or written notice that the contact is unwanted or after the victim has filed an incident report with a law enforcement agency; (3) surveillance of or the maintenance of a presence near the targeted person's: (a) residence; (b) place of work; (c) school; or (d) another place regularly occupied or visited by the targeted person; and (4) vandalism and property damage.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):South Carolina courts have construed Section 16-3-1700's harassment and stalking definitions. State v. Brandenburg (2017) held first degree harassment is a lesser included offense of stalking. Emily Major v. James Major (2026) applied them in holding a magistrate court keeps jurisdiction over a stalking restraining order between spouses.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Brandenburg (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2017, 419 S.C. 346)✓Brandenburg followed and kept contacting his estranged wife despite a no contact order; the jury acquitted him of stalking but convicted him of first degree harassment, and the court held harassment under Section 16-3-1700(A) is a lesser included offense of stalking.
- Emily Major v. James Major (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2026)✓A wife sought a magistrate restraining order over daily unwanted gifts, letters and threatening emails from her estranged husband; applying the harassment and stalking definitions in Section 16-3-1700, the court held the magistrate keeps jurisdiction even between spouses.
- Washington v. State (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2023)“…f time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose." S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-1700(D) (2015). The solicitor stated Petiti…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Laws on Recording in Public: Your Rights Explained (2026)
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 40: PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
§ 40-18-70Private Investigation License; applications; bond; renewal; display of license; qualifications of licensee; contract; reports to clients; arrest of licensee; inspections of business records; prior licenseesIn force
(A) A person who desires to operate a private investigation business in this State must apply for a Private Investigation License from SLED and pay an annual license fee which must be set by SLED regulation. (1) If the applicant is an association or corporation, the chief executive officer of the association or corporation must be the applicant or must designate in writing the corporate officer or principal who is the applicant. (2) If the applicant is a partnership, all partners must complete an application form. (3) The application for license must be made, under oath, on a form approved by SLED. The application must state the applicant's full name, age, date and place of birth, current residence address, residence addresses for the past ten years, employment for the past ten years, including names and addresses of employers, the applicant's current occupation with the name and address of the current employer, the date and place of any arrests, any convictions for violations of federal or state laws, excluding traffic violations, and any additional information as SLED requires.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
United States Code Title 18
§ 2261AStalkingIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
Whoever— travels in interstate or foreign commerce or is present within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or enters or leaves Indian country, with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel or presence engages in conduct that— places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to— that person; an immediate family member (as defined in section 115) of that person; a spouse or intimate partner of that person; or the pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse of that person; or causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to a person described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of subparagraph (A); or with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, uses the mail, any interactive computer service or electronic communication service or electronic communication system of interstate commerce, or any other…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 350 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Federal appeals courts have construed and upheld Section 2261A. United States v. Walker (2011) read in the course of, or as a result of such travel disjunctively, so pre-travel threats plus resulting fear sufficed. United States v. Amy Gonzalez (2018) held it neither overbroad nor vague and no First Amendment violation as applied.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Walker (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 2011, 665 F.3d 212)✓After emailing threats to his estranged wife, the defendant flew from Michigan to Puerto Rico and was arrested on arrival. The court read the disjunctive phrase in 2261A(1) to cover travel that itself places the target in reasonable fear, and upheld the stalking conviction.
- United States v. Amy Gonzalez (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2018, 905 F.3d 165)✓Relatives waged a years-long campaign against a mother that ended in a courthouse shooting. The court held 2261A is neither overbroad nor vague because it reaches harassing conduct, and that the mental states it lists are alternative means, not elements; convictions affirmed.
- United States v. Wills (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2003, 346 F.3d 476)✓A burglary suspect pursued the witness who identified him at a preliminary hearing; the witness later died. The court held the evidence met each element of 2261A: travel from D.C. to Virginia, intent to harm or harass, and reasonable fear of death; conviction affirmed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Colorado GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Florida GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 16: CRIMES AND OFFENSES § 16-3-5 (Person causing injury which results in death at least three years later not to be prosecuted for homicide)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- S.C. Code of Laws Title 16, Chapter 3, Article 17 (Sections 16-3-1700 to 16-3-1750), Harassment, Stalking, and Restraining Orders(scstatehouse.gov)
- S.C. Code of Laws Title 40, Chapter 18, Private Security and Investigation Agencies (Section 40-18-70)(scstatehouse.gov)
- South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED), licensing authority for private investigators(sled.sc.gov)
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), slip opinion(supremecourt.gov)
- 18 U.S.C. 2261A, federal stalking statute(law.cornell.edu)
- S.C. Code of Laws Section 17-30-140, Mobile tracking devices; contents of application for order authorizing use; standards for installation and monitoring(scstatehouse.gov)