South Carolina
South Carolina Debt Collection Laws: The Wage Garnishment Bar and the Tax-Levy Exception
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 12, 2026). · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

No debt collector can garnish a South Carolina paycheck for a credit card, a medical bill, or a personal loan, at least not directly. South Carolina law flatly bars wage garnishment for consumer credit debt, and for nearly every other kind of private judgment the practical result is the same, because the state's own court procedure never built a wage-garnishment mechanism for judgment creditors to use in the first place. But "garnishment is illegal in South Carolina" oversells the protection in a way that can genuinely hurt someone: South Carolina's own tax collector reaches deeper into a paycheck than most creditors could ever legally go, all the way to 25 percent of gross wages under Section 12-54-130, and that same collection power reaches unpaid bills owed to public hospitals. A creditor still has to sue and win a judgment before doing anything at all, and most South Carolina judgments, like everywhere, are entered by default because nobody answered.
The Consumer-Credit Wage Garnishment Ban
South Carolina's statute is direct: "With respect to a debt arising from a consumer credit sale, a consumer lease, a consumer loan, or a consumer rental-purchase agreement, regardless of where made, the creditor may not attach unpaid earnings of the debtor by garnishment or like proceedings," under S.C. Code Section 37-5-104. The "regardless of where made" language reaches out-of-state creditors too, as long as the underlying debt is consumer credit in nature. This puts South Carolina in a small group of states, alongside Texas, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina, where the practical answer to "can they garnish my paycheck for this credit card judgment" is no.
Why the Protection Effectively Extends Beyond Consumer Debt
Section 37-5-104 only names consumer credit debt, but the practical reach of South Carolina's non-garnishment goes wider, through a different mechanism entirely. Title 15, Chapter 39, South Carolina's supplementary-proceedings statute, does not provide any wage-garnishment procedure for private judgment creditors generally. Section 15-39-410, governing what a court can order in supplementary proceedings, states plainly that "the earnings of the debtor for his personal services cannot be so applied." So a tort judgment creditor or a business-debt judgment creditor also has no wage-garnishment tool available in South Carolina, not because a statute names and bans it the way 37-5-104 does, but because the procedure simply does not exist. This is a procedural-absence conclusion, distinct from the named statutory bar, and it matters to keep the two straight when explaining why a judgment cannot reach wages here.
South Carolina also blocks an out-of-state creditor from routing around this by garnishing through another state's process: under Section 15-39-420, no South Carolina employer may withhold wages under a garnishment order from an out-of-state court unless the creditor first obtains a South Carolina judgment on that same debt.
Where the Protection Actually Ends: State Taxes and Public Debts
Here is the detail that gets left out of most summaries of South Carolina's garnishment rules. Section 12-54-130 provides that when a taxpayer fails to pay within ten days after notice and demand, the Department of Revenue may serve the taxpayer's employer with a notice to withhold, and the employer "shall upon service of the notice withhold twenty-five percent of the compensation due or payable to the person for each pay period until the full amount is withheld." SCDOR's own levy guidance describes this as a levy against 25 percent of gross wages, before any tax, insurance, or retirement deductions, and the agency will lower an active levy from 25 percent to 15 percent on request through MyDORWAY if the taxpayer meets its eligibility conditions.
That same administrative levy power extends to GEAR, the state's program for collecting debts owed to other public entities. Section 12-4-580 lets the Department contract with another governmental entity to collect an outstanding liability owed to that entity, and in doing so gives the Department "all the rights and powers of collection provided pursuant to this title for the collection of taxes." The statute defines governmental entity broadly enough to cover public institutions and political subdivisions, which is why unpaid bills owed to public hospitals and penalties owed to state agencies end up in the same collection channel. In other words, a private hospital cannot garnish a South Carolina paycheck for an unpaid bill, but a public hospital's unpaid bill, collected through GEAR, can reach 25 percent of that same paycheck.

Child support withholding runs under its own federal ceiling, generally 50 to 60 percent of disposable earnings, rising another 5 points for older arrears, and federal administrative wage garnishment for defaulted student loans or other federal debts, capped at 15 percent of disposable pay, operates regardless of South Carolina's rules.
Job Protection: Narrower Than It First Appears
South Carolina's anti-retaliation statute, Section 37-5-106, bars an employer from discharging an employee "for the reason that a creditor of the employee has subjected or attempted to subject unpaid earnings of the employee to garnishment or like proceedings" arising from a consumer credit sale, lease, loan, or rental-purchase agreement. Unlike the federal rule, it carries no limit to a single debt. But its scope is narrower than it looks at first glance: it only protects against garnishment attempts in the same consumer-credit category that South Carolina already bars from reaching wages in the first place. By its own terms, Section 37-5-106 does not extend to other kinds of wage attachment, such as a state tax levy or a support order.
Bank Accounts and Other Exemptions
South Carolina's general exemption statute, Section 15-41-30(A), protects, among other categories: a $50,000 homestead exemption ($100,000 aggregate for multiple owners of the same property), $5,000 in a motor vehicle, $4,000 in household goods, $1,000 in jewelry, $5,000 in cash or liquid assets (available only if the debtor is not also claiming the homestead exemption), $1,500 in tools of the trade, and a wildcard of up to $5,000 from any unused portion of the other categories. Subsection (A)(11) separately protects Social Security, unemployment compensation, local public assistance, and pension or annuity payments. All of these dollar figures adjust every two years, each July of an even-numbered year, to the Southeastern Consumer Price Index, so the amounts printed in the statute itself may be lower than the currently effective figures; check South Carolina's current adjustment notice before relying on an exact dollar amount. None of this is self-executing beyond the federal two-month shield for directly deposited federal benefits under 31 CFR Part 212; South Carolina exemptions generally have to be claimed.
The Statute of Limitations on Debt in South Carolina
South Carolina's general limitations period for contract debt is 3 years, under Section 15-3-530(1), covering both express and implied contracts, a reduction from the prior 6-year period enacted in 1988. Because the statute covers written and oral obligations the same way, the written-versus-oral fight that decides cases elsewhere is largely moot in South Carolina, and that includes credit cards.

There are carve-outs worth knowing. Section 15-3-520 sets a 20-year period for instruments under seal and mortgage-secured written contracts, but pulls sealed notes and personal bonds for the payment of money back to the ordinary 3-year rule. UCC promissory notes get their own statute, 36-3-118: 6 years from the due date, or the accelerated due date, for definite-time notes, and 6 years after demand for demand notes, with an outer 10-year bar if no demand is ever made and no payment occurs. Contracts for the sale of goods are non-uniform here: South Carolina applies a 6-year period, longer than the standard 4-year UCC rule most states use. Section 36-2-725(1) reads: "An action for breach of any contract for sale must be commenced within six years after the cause of action has accrued." Section 15-3-140 voids any contract clause that tries to shorten these periods.
Revival: South Carolina's rule, Section 15-3-120, is worth quoting in full because a common summary of it misses half the sentence: "No acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract whereby to take the case out of the operation of this chapter unless it be contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby. But payment of any part of principal or interest is equivalent to a promise in writing." So a verbal acknowledgment or a spoken promise to pay needs a signed writing to restart the clock, but a partial payment by itself, with no writing at all, is treated as statutorily equivalent to a written promise and revives the debt on its own. That second sentence is easy to miss and changes the practical advice: making even a small payment on old South Carolina debt can restart a fresh 3-year window.
Two federal points round this out. A collector who sues, or threatens to sue, on time-barred debt violates Regulation F, 12 CFR 1006.26, regardless of what the collector knew. And time-barred is not erased: collectors may still ask for payment, and the separate 7-year credit reporting clock runs independently. See statute of limitations on debt for the full state-by-state comparison.
Car Repossession in South Carolina
South Carolina enacted the standard UCC self-help rule at 36-9-609: after default, a secured party may take possession of the collateral, and may do so either through judicial process or "without judicial process, if it proceeds without breach of the peace." For consumer transactions, a stricter state overlay sits on top of that baseline and controls in practice.
That consumer overlay, Section 37-5-112, is stricter than the plain UCC standard: a creditor may repossess without judicial process "only if possession can be taken without entry into a dwelling used as a current residence and without the use of force or other breach of the peace." Both of those bright lines, no entry into an occupied home and no use of force, sit on top of the ordinary case-law breach-of-the-peace standard.
South Carolina also gives consumers a right to cure, not just a chance to redeem after the fact. Under Sections 37-5-110 and 37-5-111, a consumer must be in default for 10 days (3 business days for rental-purchase agreements) before the creditor may even send the required notice of the right to cure, and the consumer then has a minimum of 20 days after that notice to cure the default. Until the cure period runs out, the creditor cannot accelerate the debt, take possession of the collateral, or otherwise enforce the security interest. That sequencing blocks a South Carolina repossession from happening the moment a payment is first missed, unlike states that rely on the bare UCC rule alone.
The critical limit, and the part most summaries leave out, is that the cure right runs once per obligation. Section 37-5-111(2) provides that "after a creditor has once given notice of consumer's right to cure (Section 37-5-110), this section gives the consumer no right to cure and imposes no limitation on the creditor's right to proceed against the consumer or goods that are collateral." The statutory notice form in Section 37-5-110(2) says the same thing to the consumer's face: "If you are late again in making your payments, we may exercise our rights without sending you another notice like this one." For a revolving charge or revolving loan account, the same subsection removes the cure right for any default occurring within twelve months after an earlier default for which notice was given. So the 20-day window protects a first missed payment; after that notice has gone out once, a later default on the same contract can be followed by acceleration or repossession with no new notice and no new cure period.
On the back end, Section 37-5-103 bars any deficiency judgment where the cash price of the repossessed goods was $1,500 or less, as printed in the statute; that figure adjusts for inflation under Section 37-1-109, so confirm the current adjusted number before relying on it. Above that threshold, the standard UCC deficiency accounting applies.
If You Are Being Garnished or Sued in South Carolina
Wages are off-limits to an ordinary consumer creditor in South Carolina, but that is not the same as being immune from a lawsuit or a judgment. Answer the complaint regardless, because it forces the creditor, often a debt buyer several assignments removed from the original lender, to prove ownership of the debt and the amount owed, and it preserves the 3-year limitations defense, which is lost if it is never raised. Remember that a judgment reaches your bank account and other non-exempt property even when it cannot reach your paycheck, and that the South Carolina Department of Revenue can reach your paycheck through GEAR for a public debt, including a public hospital bill, even when a private creditor cannot. If collection pressure keeps building, bankruptcy's automatic stay halts collection activity while the case is open; see South Carolina bankruptcy law for how Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 work here. None of this is a prediction about any individual case; it is the process the law provides.
Overwhelmed by debt? Get a free bankruptcy consultation
Bankruptcy can stop foreclosure, wage garnishment, and creditor calls, and which debts you can clear and what property you keep depend on your state's exemptions. Get a free, confidential consultation with a bankruptcy attorney to understand your options. There is no obligation.
Information last verified on 2026-08-12. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.

Related Resources
- Debt Collection Laws by State
- Statute of Limitations on Debt
- How to Stop Wage Garnishment
- Car Repossession Laws
- South Carolina Statute of Limitations
- South Carolina Bankruptcy
- South Carolina Child Support Laws
Last updated: 2026-08-12.
More South Carolina Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a debt collector garnish my wages in South Carolina?
Not for consumer credit debt. S.C. Code Section 37-5-104 bars it outright, and for most other private judgments there is no wage-garnishment procedure available at all under South Carolina law. Child support, state tax debts, public debts collected through GEAR, and federal administrative garnishment are exceptions.
Can South Carolina still take my paycheck for unpaid taxes or a public hospital bill?
Yes. Under Section 12-54-130, an employer served with a notice to withhold must withhold 25 percent of the compensation due each pay period, which SCDOR describes as 25 percent of gross wages, reducible to 15 percent on request through MyDORWAY. The same GEAR collection power, authorized by Section 12-4-580, reaches debts owed to other public entities, including public hospital bills.
Am I protected from being fired if my wages are garnished in South Carolina?
Section 37-5-106 bars discharge over a consumer-credit garnishment attempt, with no limit to a single debt. But it only covers that consumer-credit category, which South Carolina already bars from reaching wages in the first place, so its practical reach is narrow. It does not by its terms cover a tax levy or a support order.
What is the statute of limitations on credit card debt in South Carolina?
Three years, under Section 15-3-530(1), which applies the same period to written and oral contracts alike.
Does making a payment restart the clock on old debt in South Carolina?
Yes. Under Section 15-3-120, partial payment of principal or interest is statutorily equivalent to a written promise to pay, and restarts the limitations period on its own, without needing a separate signed writing.
Do I get a right to cure before my car is repossessed in South Carolina?
Once. Sections 37-5-110 and 37-5-111 require a default period, a notice, and a minimum 20-day cure window before a creditor can repossess. But Section 37-5-111(2) removes the cure right for later defaults on the same obligation: after the creditor has sent that notice one time, a further default can be followed by repossession with no new notice and no new cure period, and on a revolving account there is no cure right for any default within twelve months of an earlier noticed one. Section 37-5-112 still bars force and entry into an occupied home during any repossession.
Updates
Corrected the repossession section to disclose that South Carolina right to cure applies only once per obligation under Section 37-5-111(2), added the statutory citations behind the 25 percent state tax levy, and replaced unverified hedges with the verified statutory text.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 37: CONSUMER PROTECTION CODE
§ 37-5-104No garnishmentIn force
With respect to a debt arising from a consumer credit sale, a consumer lease, a consumer loan, or a consumer rental-purchase agreement, regardless of where made, the creditor may not attach unpaid earnings of the debtor by garnishment or like proceedings.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Carole Sawyer v. Tidelands Health ASC, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2023)“…Carolina law that generally prohibits garnishments, S.C. Code Ann. § 37-5-104. The district court correctly…”
- Sawyer v. Tidelands Health ASC, LLC (District Court, D. South Carolina 2021)“…rgues that the WDP is a de facto garnishment that violates S.C. Code Ann. § 37-5-104 and 15 U.S.C. § 1673. According to Pla…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 37-5-106No discharge from employment for garnishmentIn force
No employer shall discharge an employee for the reason that a creditor of the employee has subjected or attempted to subject unpaid earnings of the employee to garnishment or like proceedings directed to the employer for the purpose of paying a judgment arising from a consumer credit sale, consumer lease, consumer loan, or a consumer rental-purchase agreement.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
§ 37-5-110Notice of consumer's right to cureIn force
(1) With respect to a secured or unsecured consumer credit transaction payable in two or more installments, after a consumer has been in default for ten days for failure to make a required payment and has not voluntarily surrendered possession of goods that are collateral, a creditor may give the consumer the notice described in this section. A creditor gives notice to the consumer under this section when he delivers the notice to the consumer or mails the notice to him at his residence [Section 37-1-201(6)]. (2) The notice shall be in writing and conspicuously state: the name, address and telephone number of the creditor to whom payment is to be made, a brief identification of the credit transaction, the consumer's right to cure the default, and the amount of payment and date by which payment must be made to cure the default. A notice in substantially the following form complies with this subsection: "(name, address and telephone number of creditor) (account number, if any) (brief identification of credit transaction) __________________________________________(date is the LAST DAY FOR PAYMENT, ____________________________________________(amount) is the AMOUNT NOW DUE.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kirby v. Horne Motor Co. (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 1988, 295 S.C. 7)“…failed to give Kirby a notice of right to cure under S. C. Code Ann. Section 37-5-110 (1976). Counsel argued the repossession…”
- Foster v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1990, 302 S.C. 450)“…d no notice of default and right to cure as required under S.C. Code Ann. § 37-5-110 (1986). The trial judge granted Ford s…”
- Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Jennifer Campney (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2023)“…ore accelerating the debt after the consumer's default. See S.C. Code Ann. § 37-5-110(1) (2015). Section 37-5-110(2) of the S…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 37-5-112Creditor's right to take possession after defaultIn force
Upon default by a consumer with respect to a consumer credit transaction, unless the consumer voluntarily surrenders possession of the collateral or rented property to the creditor, the creditor may take possession of the collateral or rented property without judicial process only if possession can be taken without entry into a dwelling used as a current residence and without the use of force or other breach of the peace.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Chambers, Sr. v. Auto Brokers (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina 2019)“…cial process if it proceeds without breach of the peace.”); S.C. Code Ann. § 37-5-112 (“Upon default by a consumer with resp…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
South Carolina Code of Laws, Title 15: CIVIL REMEDIES AND PROCEDURES
§ 15-39-410Property which may be ordered to be applied to executionIn force
The judge may order any property of the judgment debtor, not exempt from execution, in the hands either of himself or any other person or due to the judgment debtor, to be applied toward the satisfaction of the judgment, except that the earnings of the debtor for his personal services cannot be so applied.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Johnson v. Service Management, Inc. (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 1995, 319 S.C. 165)“…debtor to be applied toward satisfaction of the judgment. S.C. Code Ann. § 15-39-410 ; Lynn, 228 S.C. at 362…”
- First Citizens v. Taylor (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2020)“…be applied toward the satisfaction of the judgment . . . ." S.C. Code Ann. § 15-39-410 (2005) (emphasis added). Our code also…”
- Ex Parte Anthony L. Mathis v. MD Medical (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2018)“…which the judgment against him may be satisfied . . . ."); S.C. Code Ann. § 15-39-410 (2005) (establishing a master-in-equity…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 15-39-420Withholding of wages pursuant to foreign garnishment proceeding prohibited under certain circumstancesIn force
(1) No employer in this State shall withhold any portion of the wages of any employee residing in this State as a result of any garnishment proceedings brought in any court outside of this State unless the creditor first obtains a judgment against such employee growing out of the same indebtedness for which the garnishment proceedings were instituted in a court of competent jurisdiction in South Carolina. The burden of proving the competent jurisdiction of the court shall rest upon the creditor. (2) The provisions of this section shall not apply to any debt incurred outside the State of South Carolina by such employee nor shall there be any garnishment of earnings for personal services rendered by the employee regardless of where the debt was incurred. (3) Any employer violating the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not more than one thousand dollars.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
§ 15-3-530Three yearsIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
Within three years: (1) an action upon a contract, obligation, or liability, express or implied, excepting those provided for in Section 15-3-520; (2) an action upon a liability created by statute other than a penalty or forfeiture; (3) an action for trespass upon or damage to real property; (4) an action for taking, detaining, or injuring any goods or chattels including an action for the specific recovery of personal property; (5) an action for assault, battery, or any injury to the person or rights of another, not arising on contract and not enumerated by law, and those provided for in Section 15-3-545; (6) an action under Sections 15-51-10 to 15-51-60 for death by wrongful act, the period to begin to run upon the death of the person on account of whose death the action is brought; (7) any action for relief on the ground of fraud in cases which prior to the adoption of the Code of Civil Procedure in 1870 were solely cognizable by the court of chancery, the cause of action in the case not considered to have accrued until the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts constituting the fraud; (8) an action on any policy of insurance, either fire or life, whereby any…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 202 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Santee Portland Cement Co. v. Daniel International Corp. (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1989, 299 S.C. 269)“…f contract was barred by the statute of limitations. See S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-530 (1) (1976) (six year period in which to…”
- Thomerson v. DeVito (Supreme Court of South Carolina 2020)“…Does the three-year statute of limitations of S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-530 apply to claims for promissory estoppel…”
- Dean v. Ruscon Corp. (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1996, 321 S.C. 360)“…rior to April 5,1988, . must be commenced within six years. S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-530(3) (1976). The discovery rule is applic…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: South Carolina Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type, South Carolina Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, South Carolina Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim
§ 15-3-120Effect of new promises in writing or part paymentsIn force
No acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract whereby to take the case out of the operation of this chapter unless it be contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby. But payment of any part of principal or interest is equivalent to a promise in writing.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Murray v. The Estate of William E. Murray (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2022)“…in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby." S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-120 (2005). However, "payment of any part o…”
- In re Vaughn (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina 2015, 536 B.R. 670)“…some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby.” S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-120 (2015). 10 This new promise to pay “m…”
- In re Washington (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina 2017, 581 B.R. 150)“…firmed Chapter 11 Plan on the statute of limitations under S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-120 . Mr. Featheringill testified that Debt…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 15-41-30Property exempt from attachment, levy, and saleIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(A) The following real and personal property of a debtor domiciled in this State is exempt from attachment, levy, and sale under any mesne or final process issued by a court or bankruptcy proceeding: (1)(a) The debtor's aggregate interest, not to exceed fifty thousand dollars in value, in real property or personal property that the debtor or a dependent of the debtor uses as a residence, in a cooperative that owns property that the debtor or a dependent of the debtor uses as a residence, or in a burial plot for the debtor or a dependent of the debtor, except that the aggregate value of multiple homestead exemptions allowable with respect to a single living unit may not exceed one hundred thousand dollars. If there are multiple owners of such a living unit exempt as a homestead, the value of the exemption of each individual owner may not exceed his fractional portion of one hundred thousand dollars.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at scstatehouse.gov
Cited in 19 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Cerny v. Salter (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1993, 311 S.C. 430)“…ty, Appellants (Cernys) challenge the constitutionality of S.C. Code Ann. § 15-41-30 (11)(B) (Supp. 1992). We affirm.…”
- American Service Corp. v. Hickle (Supreme Court of South Carolina 1993, 312 S.C. 520)“…appeals an Order holding that the Homestead Exemption Act, S.C. Code Ann § 15-41-30(11)(B) (Supp. 1992) 1 deprives Respond…”
- Ronaghan v. Charpia (Court of Appeals of South Carolina 2020)“…a is entitled to a homestead exemption in the property. See S.C. Code Ann. § 15-41-30(A)(1)(a) (2005 & Supp. 2019) (providing…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy in South Carolina (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
Code of Federal Regulations Title 12
§ 1006.26Collection of time-barred debts.In forcecited in 37 of our articles
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section: (1) Statute of limitations means the period prescribed by applicable law for bringing a legal action against the consumer to collect a debt. (2) Time-barred debt means a debt for which the applicable statute of limitations has expired. (b) Legal actions and threats of legal actions prohibited. A debt collector must not bring or threaten to bring a legal action against a consumer to collect a time-barred debt. This paragraph (b) does not apply to proofs of claim filed in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (2024) dismissed FDCPA claims built on 12 CFR 1006.26(b), reasoning it bars only collection of time-barred debts and the loans at issue were not time barred. Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (2025) dismissed a Regulation F claim because nonjudicial foreclosure is not covered by the FDCPA.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2024)✓A borrower claimed a servicer's letter and billing statement lacked language required by 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court granted the servicer summary judgment, since the rule only bars collecting time-barred debts and it had already found her HELOC and mortgage enforceable.
- Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2025)✓Pro se homeowners alleged a servicer and foreclosure attorneys pursued a time-barred, discharged second mortgage in violation of 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court dismissed that claim, holding parties carrying out a nonjudicial foreclosure are not FDCPA debt collectors.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Debt Collection Laws: Garnishment Limits, Debt Deadlines, and Repossession, Maine Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Michigan Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- S.C. Code Section 37-5-104, Restriction on Garnishment(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Code Section 15-39-410, Supplementary Proceedings; Personal Service Earnings(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Code Section 15-39-420, Out-of-State Garnishment Orders(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- South Carolina Department of Revenue, Wage and Bank Account Levies(dor.sc.gov).gov
- S.C. Code Section 37-5-106, No Discharge Because of Garnishment(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Code Section 15-41-30, Property Exempt from Attachment, Levy, and Sale(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Code Sections 15-3-530 and 15-3-120, Limitation of Actions; Revival by Acknowledgment or Payment(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Code Sections 37-5-110 to 37-5-112, Notice of Right to Cure; Limitation on Method of Repossession(scstatehouse.gov).gov
- S.C. Code Section 12-54-130, Notice to Employer to Withhold Compensation(scstatehouse.gov)
- S.C. Code Section 12-4-580, Authority to Contract to Collect Outstanding Liabilities (GEAR)(scstatehouse.gov)
- South Carolina Department of Revenue, Levies on Wages or Intangible Assets(dor.sc.gov)
- S.C. Code Section 36-2-725, Statute of Limitations in Contracts for Sale(scstatehouse.gov)
- S.C. Code Section 36-9-609, Secured Party Right to Take Possession After Default(scstatehouse.gov)