Alabama
Alabama GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited June 17, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. How we verify our legal content
Putting a GPS tracker on someone else's car in Alabama can now land you in prison. Since September 1, 2023, the state has two criminal statutes aimed squarely at hidden trackers, covering everything from hardwired GPS units to an AirTag dropped in a door pocket.
The short version: you can track a vehicle you own or co-own, and you can track a vehicle with the owner's permission. Track anyone else's car and you are committing a crime, even if you never intended to scare or harass the person.
This guide breaks down Ala. Code 13A-6-95 and 13A-6-96 in plain English. It is part of our GPS Tracking Laws by State series.
Is It Legal to Put a GPS Tracker on a Car in Alabama?
It is legal only if the car is yours or you have the owner's consent. Alabama law asks one core question: did the owner of the property agree to the device being placed on it?
If you own the vehicle, you are the owner and your own consent is all you need. That covers tracking your own car, a fleet vehicle your business owns, or a car titled in your name that someone else drives.
If the car belongs to someone else and they have not agreed, placing a tracker on it is a crime. There is no exception for spouses with separately titled cars, dating partners, exes, or someone you suspect of wrongdoing. Suspicion of cheating or theft does not create a legal right to track another person's vehicle.
Alabama's Electronic Stalking Statutes (Ala. Code 13A-6-95 and 13A-6-96)
Before 2023, Alabama had no statute directly addressing trackers placed by private individuals. House Bill 153, passed unanimously that year, closed the gap by creating two new crimes, both called electronic stalking.
![]()
Electronic stalking in the first degree (Ala. Code 13A-6-95). A person who, without the consent of the owner or except as otherwise authorized by law, places any electronic tracking device on the property of another person with the intent to surveil, stalk, or harass, or for any other unlawful purpose, commits a Class C felony.
The felony jumps to Class B if the conduct also violates an existing domestic violence protection order, elder abuse protection order, temporary restraining order, or any other court order.
Electronic stalking in the second degree (Ala. Code 13A-6-96). This is the same act of placing a tracker without owner consent, but with no intent element at all. The state does not have to prove you meant to stalk or harass anyone. Placement alone is a Class A misdemeanor.
The definitions matter. An electronic tracking device is "an electronic or mechanical device that permits the tracking of the movement of a person or object," which covers dedicated GPS units, OBD-port trackers, AirTags, Tiles, and similar item trackers.
The owner is any individual, other than the defendant, "who has possession of or any other interest in the property involved and without whose consent the defendant has no authority to exert control over the property." That closing clause is the operative part. Someone counts as the owner only if you would need their consent to exert control over the property, and a co-owner already has that authority in their own right, which is why tracking a car you co-own is lawful.
One procedural detail is unusual: the statute of limitations does not begin running until the device is discovered, not when it was planted. Charges can also be filed in the county where the device was discovered or where the owner lives.
Who Can Legally Track a Vehicle in Alabama
Working from the statute's two exceptions, owner consent and "authorized by law," here is who is in the clear:
- The vehicle's owner or co-owner. If your name is on the title, or you otherwise have possession or an ownership interest, you can install a tracker.
- Anyone with the owner's consent. A mechanic, a friend, or a tracking service acting with the owner's permission is fine.
- Parents tracking a car they own. A parent who owns the car their teenager drives is the owner. Tracking an adult child's separately owned car without consent is not covered.
- Police with a warrant. In United States v. Jones (2012), the U.S. Supreme Court held that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and monitoring its movements is a Fourth Amendment search, so law enforcement generally needs a warrant. Alabama has its own tracking-device warrant statute, Ala. Code 15-5-50, and it is the concrete content of the "except as otherwise authorized by law" exception. Any circuit or district court judge may issue the warrant on a sworn application from a law enforcement officer, district attorney, or the Attorney General stating facts sufficient to show probable cause. The warrant may authorize tracking for no more than 45 days, though the judge can grant extensions of up to 45 days each based on new, renewed, or ongoing probable cause; the device must be installed within 10 days; and the officer must make a written return within 10 days after the tracking ends and serve a copy of the warrant on the person who was tracked. That notice can be delayed, ordinarily by no more than 90 days after the warrant is returned, if immediate notice would endanger someone, prompt flight, or otherwise jeopardize the investigation.
Notice who is missing from that list. Alabama's statutes contain no carve-outs for private investigators, lienholders, or repossession companies. A PI who plants a tracker without the owner's consent faces the same charges as anyone else.
On the federal side, no general federal statute bans private GPS tracking. But if tracking is part of a pattern of harassment that crosses state lines or causes fear or substantial emotional distress, the federal stalking statute, 18 U.S.C. 2261A, can apply on top of state charges.
Can My Employer Track My Car in Alabama?
If you drive a company-owned vehicle, your employer can track it. The company is the owner, and the owner's consent is the only consent the statute requires. Alabama has no law requiring employers to notify employees about GPS on company vehicles, though written disclosure is standard practice.
Your personal car is a different story. An employer who hides a tracker on a vehicle you own, without your consent, is committing the same crime as anyone else. Tracking a personal vehicle used for work requires your agreement, usually through a signed policy or an app you install yourself.
Workplace monitoring questions often overlap with audio and video recording. See our guide to Alabama recording laws for how consent rules work for conversations.
AirTags and Item Trackers
Alabama's definition of an electronic tracking device is technology-neutral. An Apple AirTag, Samsung SmartTag, or Tile slipped into someone's bag, coat, or car functions exactly like a GPS tracker under the statute, and prosecutors can charge it the same way.
![]()
That means dropping an AirTag into an ex-partner's vehicle is at minimum a Class A misdemeanor, and a Class C felony if the intent was to surveil or stalk. Wanting to know someone's location is exactly the surveillance the statute targets.
Both Apple and Google now push unwanted-tracker alerts to nearby phones. If your phone warns that an unknown tracker is moving with you, treat it seriously and follow the steps below.
Penalties for Illegal GPS Tracking in Alabama
| Offense | Statute | Classification | Penalty range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electronic stalking, 2nd degree (placement only) | Ala. Code 13A-6-96 | Class A misdemeanor | Up to 1 year in jail and fines up to $6,000 |
| Electronic stalking, 1st degree (intent to surveil, stalk, or harass) | Ala. Code 13A-6-95 | Class C felony | 1 year and 1 day to 10 years in prison and fines up to $15,000 |
| Electronic stalking, 1st degree, in violation of a court order | Ala. Code 13A-6-95(b)(2) | Class B felony | 2 to 20 years in prison and fines up to $30,000 |
Sentence and fine ranges come from Alabama's general sentencing statutes, Ala. Code 13A-5-6, 13A-5-7, 13A-5-11, and 13A-5-12.
Tracking can also feed other charges. Repeatedly following or monitoring someone in a way that causes fear can support a prosecution for stalking under Ala. Code 13A-6-90 and 13A-6-91, which carry their own penalties.
Civil Lawsuits and Protective Orders
The electronic stalking statutes are criminal laws and create no private right of action, so you cannot sue someone "under 13A-6-95" for money damages.
You are not without civil options. Alabama courts recognize the common-law tort of invasion of privacy, including intrusion upon seclusion. Secretly monitoring someone's movements with a hidden device is the kind of conduct that can support that claim.
If the tracking is part of domestic violence or stalking, you can also seek a protection order. A protection-from-abuse order can bar contact and surveillance, and it raises any future tracker placement from a Class C to a Class B felony. Our guide to Alabama restraining order laws walks through that process.
What to Do If You Find a GPS Tracker on Your Car
Finding a tracker is unsettling, but what you do next matters for both your safety and any prosecution.
![]()
- Do not destroy it. The device is evidence. Its serial number and registration can identify who planted it.
- Photograph everything. Capture the device in place before anyone moves it, including where it was hidden.
- Call the police. Placement without your consent is a crime by itself. You do not need to prove the person meant to stalk you.
- Let officers remove and log the device if possible.
- Think about safety. If you suspect a current or former partner, contact a domestic violence advocate and consider a protection order. Assume your past locations are known.
- Check your other property. Look through bags, other vehicles, and items the person had access to. If you also suspect hidden cameras, see our surveillance camera laws hub.
Remember that the clock for prosecutors starts when you discover the device. Reporting it promptly preserves the case.
Sources
Primary sources for this article, including the enrolled text of HB153 and the U.S. Supreme Court's GPS tracking decision, are listed below.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws change and their application depends on specific facts. If you are facing a GPS tracking issue in Alabama, consult a licensed Alabama attorney. If you are in danger, call 911 or the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 800-799-7233.
More Alabama Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I put a GPS tracker on my spouse's car in Alabama?
Only if you have an ownership interest in the car or your spouse consents. Alabama treats a person as the owner only where you would have no authority to control the property without their consent, so a jointly titled family car you co-own is generally fair game. Hiding a tracker on a car titled solely to your spouse, without their consent, is a crime even during a divorce.
Is it legal for a private investigator to place a GPS tracker in Alabama?
Alabama's electronic stalking statutes contain no exception for private investigators. A PI may only place a tracker with the consent of the vehicle's owner, such as a client who co-owns the car being tracked. Planting one on a third party's vehicle exposes the PI and potentially the client to criminal charges.
Can I track my teenager's car?
Yes, if you own the car, which is the usual situation with a minor driver. As the owner, your consent is the only consent required. If your adult child solely owns their own vehicle, you need their permission like anyone else.
What is the penalty for putting an AirTag on someone's car in Alabama?
An AirTag counts as an electronic tracking device. Placement without the owner's consent is at minimum a Class A misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail and a $6,000 fine. If prosecutors can show intent to surveil, stalk, or harass, it becomes a Class C felony carrying up to 10 years in prison.
Can police put a GPS tracker on my car without a warrant?
Generally no. The U.S. Supreme Court held in United States v. Jones (2012) that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and monitoring its movements is a Fourth Amendment search, so law enforcement normally needs a warrant supported by probable cause.
Can I sue someone who tracked my car?
Not under the criminal statutes themselves, which create no private right of action. But Alabama recognizes the common-law tort of invasion of privacy, and secret location tracking can support an intrusion upon seclusion claim for damages. Talk to a civil attorney about your specific facts.
How long do prosecutors have to file GPS tracking charges?
The statute of limitations begins when the device is discovered, not when it was planted. From discovery, Alabama allows 12 months to charge a misdemeanor and five years for these felonies under Ala. Code 15-3-1 and 15-3-2.
Updates
Added Alabama's own tracking-device warrant statute, Ala. Code 15-5-50, to the section on lawful police tracking, and completed the statutory definition of owner so the explanation of why co-owner tracking is lawful matches the full text of Ala. Code 13A-6-92(5).
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Code of Alabama 1975, Title 13A: Criminal Code.
§ 13A-6-95Electronic Stalking in the First Degree.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) A person who, without the consent of the owner or except as otherwise authorized by law, places any electronic tracking device on the property of another person with the intent to surveil, stalk, or harass, or for any other unlawful purpose, is guilty of the crime of electronic stalking in the first degree. (b)(1) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (2), a violation of this section is a Class C felony. (2) A person who violates this section and whose conduct violates an existing domestic violence protection order, elder abuse protection order, temporary restraining order, or any other court order, shall be guilty of a Class B felony. (c) In any criminal proceeding brought pursuant to this section, the crime shall be considered to have been committed in all of the following: (1) The county in which any part of the crime took place. (2) The county where the electronic tracking device was discovered. (3) The county of residence of the owner of the property. (d) The statute of limitations shall begin at the time of the discovery of the electronic tracking device.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at alison.legislature.state.al.us
Also relied on in: GPS Tracking Laws by State: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
§ 13A-6-96Electronic Stalking in the Second Degree.In force
(a) A person who, without the consent of the owner or except as otherwise authorized by law, places any electronic tracking device on the property of another person is guilty of the crime of electronic stalking in the second degree. (b) A violation of this section is a Class A misdemeanor. (c) In any criminal proceeding brought pursuant to this section, the crime shall be considered to have been committed in all of the following: (1) The county in which any part of the crime took place. (2) The county where the electronic tracking device was discovered. (3) The county of residence of the owner of the property. (d) The statute of limitations shall begin at the time of the discovery of the electronic tracking device.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at alison.legislature.state.al.us
§ 13A-6-90Stalking in the First Degree.In force
(a) A person who intentionally and repeatedly follows or harasses another person and who makes a threat, either expressed or implied, with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily harm is guilty of the crime of stalking in the first degree. (b) The crime of stalking in the first degree is a Class C felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at alison.legislature.state.al.us
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Morton v. State (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama 1994, 651 So. 2d 42)“…serious bodily harm is guilty of the crime of stalking." Ala. Code 1975, § 13A-6-90 (a). In connection with the crime of st…”
- United States v. Saunders (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces 2003, 59 M.J. 1)“…ese laws were in effect at the time of Appellant’s conduct. Ala. Code § 13A-6-90 (Michie, LEXIS through 2003 Sess.); Ala…”
- Williams v. City of Montgomery, Ala. (District Court, M.D. Alabama 1999, 48 F. Supp. 2d 1317)“…otections to victims of domestic violence. See Ala.Code §§ 13A-6-90; 15A-10-3(a); 30-5A-1; 30-5-l(b).…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 13A-5-6Sentences of Imprisonment for Felonies.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Sentences for felonies shall be for a definite term of imprisonment, which imprisonment includes hard labor, within the following limitations: (1) For a Class A felony, for life or not more than 99 years or less than 10 years. (2) For a Class B felony, not more than 20 years or less than two years. (3) For a Class C felony, not more than 10 years or less than one year and one day. (4) For a Class D felony, not more than five years or less than one year and one day. (5) For a Class A felony in which a firearm or deadly weapon was used or attempted to be used in the commission of the felony, or a Class A felony sex offense involving a child as defined in Section 15-20A-4, not less than 20 years. (6) For a Class B or C felony in which a firearm or deadly weapon was used or attempted to be used in the commission of the felony, or a Class B felony sex offense involving a child as defined in Section 15-20A-4, not less than 10 years. (b) The actual time of release within the limitations established by subsection (a) shall be determined under procedures established elsewhere by law.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at alison.legislature.state.al.us
Cited in 50 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ex Parte McCree (Supreme Court of Alabama 1988, 554 So. 2d 336)“…ars in prison under Alabama's firearms enhancement statute (Ala. Code 1975, § 13A-5-6 (a)(5)). 1 FACTS Because the Cour…”
- Ex Parte Powell (Supreme Court of Alabama 2001, 796 So. 2d 434)“…ted the penalty phase of Powell's trial, in accordance with Ala. Code 1975, § 13A-5-6 . After hearing the evidence presented…”
- Ex Parte Farrell (Supreme Court of Alabama 1991, 591 So. 2d 444)“…ether the trial court erred by sentencing Janet pursuant to Ala. Code 1975, § 13A-5-6 (a)(4) instead of § 13A-5-6 (a)(1).…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama Hit and Run Laws: Penalties, Statutes, and Defenses
Code of Alabama 1975, Title 15: Criminal Procedure.
§ 15-3-1Felonies Generally.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
Except as otherwise provided by law, the prosecution of all felonies, except those specified in Section 15-3-3, Section 15-3-5, or any other felony that has a specified limitations period, shall be commenced within five years after the commission of the offense.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at alison.legislature.state.al.us
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2015
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Cox v. State (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama 1991, 585 So. 2d 182)“…racy was barred by a three-year statute of limitations. See Ala. Code 1975, § 15-3-1 . The indictment was dismissed and Cox…”
- Robinson v. State (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama 1982, 428 So. 2d 148)“…e of limitations for violation of § 20-2-80 is three years. Ala.Code 1975, § 15-3-1. Inasmuch as the indictment was returne…”
- Hulsey v. State (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama 2015, 196 So. 3d 342)“…year statute of limitations” and “was thus time-barred by Ala.Code § 15-3-1.” (Hulsey’s brief, p. 15.) Hulsey also…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
§ 15-5-50Warrant for Tracking Device Installation; Requirements; Procedures.In force
(a) Any circuit or district court judge in this state is authorized to issue a warrant to install a tracking device. The term tracking device means an electronic or mechanical device which permits the tracking of the movement of a person or object. (b) Upon the written application, under oath, of any law enforcement officer as defined in Alabama Rule of Criminal Procedure 1.4, district attorney, or Attorney General of the state, including assistant and deputy district attorneys and assistant and deputy attorneys general, any authorized judge may issue a warrant for the installation, retrieval, maintenance, repair, use, or monitoring of a tracking device. The warrant application shall do all of the following: (1) State facts sufficient to show probable cause that a crime is being, has been, or is about to be committed in the jurisdiction of the issuing judge. (2) Identify the person, if reasonably determinable, or object, or both, that is, was, or will be involved in the commission of the alleged offense. (3) Describe, with particularity, the item or person, or both, to be tracked by use of a tracking device.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at alison.legislature.state.al.us
United States Code Title 18
§ 2261AStalkingIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
Whoever— travels in interstate or foreign commerce or is present within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or enters or leaves Indian country, with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel or presence engages in conduct that— places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to— that person; an immediate family member (as defined in section 115) of that person; a spouse or intimate partner of that person; or the pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse of that person; or causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to a person described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of subparagraph (A); or with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, uses the mail, any interactive computer service or electronic communication service or electronic communication system of interstate commerce, or any other…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 350 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Federal appeals courts have construed and upheld Section 2261A. United States v. Walker (2011) read in the course of, or as a result of such travel disjunctively, so pre-travel threats plus resulting fear sufficed. United States v. Amy Gonzalez (2018) held it neither overbroad nor vague and no First Amendment violation as applied.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Walker (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 2011, 665 F.3d 212)✓After emailing threats to his estranged wife, the defendant flew from Michigan to Puerto Rico and was arrested on arrival. The court read the disjunctive phrase in 2261A(1) to cover travel that itself places the target in reasonable fear, and upheld the stalking conviction.
- United States v. Amy Gonzalez (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2018, 905 F.3d 165)✓Relatives waged a years-long campaign against a mother that ended in a courthouse shooting. The court held 2261A is neither overbroad nor vague because it reaches harassing conduct, and that the mental states it lists are alternative means, not elements; convictions affirmed.
- United States v. Wills (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2003, 346 F.3d 476)✓A burglary suspect pursued the witness who identified him at a preliminary hearing; the witness later died. The court held the evidence met each element of 2261A: travel from D.C. to Virginia, intent to harm or harass, and reasonable fear of death; conviction affirmed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Colorado GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Florida GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Ohio GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Alabama HB153 (2023), Enrolled Act adding Ala. Code 13A-6-95 and 13A-6-96(alison.legislature.state.al.us)
- Code of Alabama 1975, Alabama Legislature official code portal(alison.legislature.state.al.us)
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), slip opinion(supremecourt.gov)
- 18 U.S.C. 2261A, federal stalking statute(law.cornell.edu)
- I See You: Examining GPS Technology Under Alabama's Criminal Code, University of Alabama School of Law(law.ua.edu)
- Ala. Code 15-5-50, Warrant for Tracking Device Installation; Requirements; Procedures (Code of Alabama 1975, Act 2016-340)(alison.legislature.state.al.us)