Iowa
Iowa GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited June 17, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. How we verify our legal content
Hiding a GPS tracker on someone else's car in Iowa can be charged as a serious misdemeanor. Use that tracker as part of a pattern of stalking, and Iowa law treats it far more harshly: stalking with a technological device is a class C felony, punishable by up to 10 years in prison, even for a first offense.
That second part surprises people. In most states, tech-assisted stalking only bumps the penalty after a repeat offense or a protective order violation. Iowa flipped that in 2023. The moment a GPS device enters the picture, a first-time stalking charge jumps two felony classes.
This guide explains Iowa Code 708.11A (the GPS placement crime), Iowa Code 708.11 (the stalking felony), who is allowed to track a vehicle, and what to do if you find a tracker on your car. It is part of our GPS Tracking Laws by State series.
Is It Legal to Put a GPS Tracker on a Car in Iowa?
It is legal to put a GPS tracker on a car you own. It is generally illegal to put one on someone else's car without their consent if your goal is to follow their movements and you have no legitimate reason for doing so.
Iowa Code 708.11A makes it a crime to place a global positioning device on another person, or on an object, without the other person's consent, in order to track that person without a legitimate purpose. The crime is a serious misdemeanor.
Notice the two separate hurdles built into that sentence: no consent, and no legitimate purpose. Both matter, and the second one makes Iowa's law meaningfully different from the GPS statutes in many other states.
The bigger danger sits one section earlier in the code. If the tracking is part of a course of conduct that places someone in fear, the charge is no longer the misdemeanor under 708.11A. It is felony stalking under 708.11, and the GPS itself is what elevates it to a class C felony.
Iowa's GPS Placement Law (Iowa Code 708.11A) and Its Legitimate Purpose Element
The legislature added section 708.11A in 2017, in the same bill that rewrote the stalking statute. It covers placing a GPS device "on another person, or on an object" without consent in order to track the person.
The phrase "on an object" is what reaches vehicles, purses, and backpacks. You do not have to attach the device to the person's body. Sliding a tracker into a wheel well or under a bumper counts. The statute says "an object," not the target's property, so a leased, borrowed, rented, or co-owned vehicle the target does not own is still covered.
The unusual part is the legitimate purpose element. The state must prove the tracking happened without a legitimate purpose. That is an element of the offense, not a defense the accused has to raise, so prosecutors carry the burden of negating it.
In practice, that carve-out shelters obviously justified tracking. A business monitoring its own delivery vans has a legitimate purpose. A parent tracking a minor child's location for safety arguably does too, though Iowa courts have not drawn a precise line. A suspicious spouse tracking a partner's separately owned car, or an ex following a former partner, will have a very hard time claiming any legitimate purpose.
Compare that to California Penal Code 637.7 or Florida Statutes 934.425, which ban tracking another person's vehicle without consent outright, with narrow listed exceptions. Iowa's statute is weaker on paper because of the legitimate purpose language. But Iowa compensates with one of the toughest stalking enhancements in the country, covered next.
Stalking With a GPS Is a Class C Felony, Even the First Time (Iowa Code 708.11)
Iowa Code 708.11 defines stalking as purposefully engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, or threatened, or to fear bodily injury or death, when the offender knows or should know the conduct will have that effect. Lawmakers broadened that fear element in 2017, in 2017 Iowa Acts chapter 83 (H.F. 263). Before that amendment the course of conduct had to threaten bodily injury or death, and a separate element required that the victim actually be induced to fear it. The 2017 act added the "terrorized, frightened, intimidated, or threatened" alternative and struck the separate actual-fear element, so subsection 2 now has two paragraphs rather than three.
![]()
Ordinarily, a first stalking offense is an aggravated misdemeanor, punishable by up to 2 years. A second offense is a class D felony, and a third or subsequent offense is a class C felony on its own.
Here is the Iowa twist. Under 708.11(3)(a)(4), added by 2023 Iowa Acts chapter 74 (S.F. 84), stalking is a class C felony when the offender "utilizes a technological device while committing stalking," even if it is the offender's first offense. The same 2023 act created the definition in 708.11(1)(e), which expressly lists a global positioning device. Before it, the Iowa Code carried no definition of technological device in the stalking statute at all, and a first offense involving a tracker was not a class C felony: the protective-order, dangerous-weapon, and victim-under-18 factors were class D felonies, and class C was reserved for a third or subsequent offense.
A class C felony in Iowa carries up to 10 years in prison and a fine of $1,370 to $13,660 under Iowa Code 902.9. Stalking is also a class C felony when the offender is subject to a protective or no-contact order, possesses a dangerous weapon, targets a victim under 18, or commits a third or subsequent offense.
The practical message is blunt. Following an ex around town on foot might start as a misdemeanor case. Doing the same thing with a $20 tracker stuck under their car starts as a 10-year felony.
Who Can Legally Track a Vehicle in Iowa
Several categories of tracking remain lawful:
- Your own vehicle. Tracking a car titled in your name, including one driven by a family member, does not violate 708.11A because the tracking has a legitimate purpose and you consent to the device on your own property.
- Tracking with consent. If the vehicle owner agrees to the device, there is no crime. Get that consent in writing.
- Business and fleet vehicles. A company tracking vehicles it owns is the textbook legitimate purpose.
- Parents of minor children. Tracking a minor child for safety is widely treated as legitimate, though tracking the other parent's car during a custody dispute is a different story and a common way people get charged.
- Law enforcement with a warrant. After the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Jones (2012), attaching a GPS device to a vehicle to monitor its movements is a Fourth Amendment search, so police generally need a warrant. Iowa has its own procedure for one. Iowa Code 808.4A lets a peace officer apply to a magistrate for a search warrant authorizing the placement, tracking, monitoring, or removal of a global positioning device, on a showing of probable cause, and the warrant then commands an officer to place, track, monitor, or remove it.
Co-owned cars in a divorce sit in a gray zone. A spouse who jointly owns the vehicle has a stronger argument than one tracking a separately titled car, but if the tracking feeds a pattern that frightens the other spouse, the stalking statute can still apply. Family law attorneys in Iowa routinely warn clients against it.
Can My Employer Track My Car in Iowa?
Iowa has no statute limiting employer GPS tracking, so the default rules apply.
If the vehicle belongs to the employer, the employer can track it. Courts have consistently found that employees have a minimal expectation of privacy in the location of a company-owned vehicle used for work, and the company plainly has a legitimate purpose.
Your personal car is different. An employer that hides a tracker on an employee's personal vehicle without consent runs straight into 708.11A, and the legitimate purpose argument gets much weaker once the tracking follows you off the clock. Careful employers handle this with written consent policies, often through a mileage or telematics app the employee installs knowingly.
If workplace monitoring is your concern more broadly, see our guide to workplace surveillance camera laws and Iowa's recording laws.
AirTags and Item Trackers
Iowa's statutes do not mention Apple AirTags, Tile, or Samsung SmartTags by name. The two statutes reach them differently, and only one of them clearly does.
The stalking side is settled. Iowa Code 708.11(1)(e) defines a technological device as a global positioning device "or other electronic device that can be used for creating, storing, or transmitting information in the form of electronic data," which comfortably covers a Bluetooth item tracker.
![]()
The placement offense is less settled. Iowa Code 708.11A reaches only a "global positioning device," a phrase the Iowa Code nowhere defines, and the 708.11(1)(e) definition is written "as used in this section," meaning the stalking statute alone. An AirTag has no GPS receiver of its own; it reports its location by piggybacking on nearby phones. Charging AirTag placement under 708.11A is therefore likely but untested, and no Iowa appellate decision has resolved it.
Dropping an AirTag into someone's bag or attaching one to their car, in order to monitor where they go, still carries serious criminal exposure. If it is part of conduct that puts the person in fear, it is a class C felony under the stalking statute, which is the firmer of the two theories.
Apple and Google now push anti-stalking alerts to nearby phones when an unknown tracker travels with you. Those alerts are frequently the first piece of evidence in Iowa tracking cases.
Penalties for Illegal GPS Tracking in Iowa
| Offense | Statute | Classification | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unauthorized placement of a GPS device | Iowa Code 708.11A | Serious misdemeanor | Up to 1 year in jail; fine of $430 to $2,560 |
| Stalking, first offense (no enhancement) | Iowa Code 708.11(3)(c) | Aggravated misdemeanor | Up to 2 years; fine of $855 to $8,540 |
| Stalking, second offense (no class C factor) | Iowa Code 708.11(3)(b) | Class D felony | Up to 5 years; fine of $1,025 to $10,245 |
| Stalking using a technological device (including GPS), while subject to a protective order, with a dangerous weapon, victim under 18, or third or subsequent offense | Iowa Code 708.11(3)(a) | Class C felony | Up to 10 years; fine of $1,370 to $13,660 |
Fine amounts come from Iowa Code 902.9 (felonies) and 903.1 (misdemeanors).
Federal law can stack on top. 18 U.S.C. 2261A makes it a federal crime to use any electronic communication service or electronic monitoring to engage in a course of conduct that places a person in fear or causes substantial emotional distress, with interstate elements. Cross-border tracking cases are sometimes charged federally.
Civil Options and Protective Orders
Iowa does not give tracking victims a dedicated statutory right to sue, the way California Penal Code 637.7 pairs with that state's privacy claims. But Iowa victims still have civil tools.
Invasion of privacy. Iowa recognizes the common-law tort of intrusion upon seclusion. Secretly monitoring someone's daily movements with a hidden device is the kind of highly offensive intrusion the tort was built for, and a successful claim can recover damages.
Protective orders. Victims can seek civil protective orders, including under Iowa Code chapter 236 for domestic abuse and chapter 236A for sexual abuse. Once criminal charges are filed, courts issue no-contact orders, and stalking while subject to one independently triggers the class C felony tier. Our guide to Iowa restraining order laws walks through the process.
Divorce and custody consequences. Evidence obtained through illegal tracking can backfire badly in family court, and the tracking itself can support a protective order against the person who placed the device.
What to Do If You Find a Tracker on Your Car
- Do not destroy it. The device is evidence, and its serial number can identify the buyer.
- Photograph it in place. Capture where it was mounted before anyone moves it.
- Call local police or the county sheriff. Report it under Iowa Code 708.11A, and mention any history of harassment so officers evaluate the stalking statute too.
- Save tracker alerts. Screenshot any AirTag or unknown-tracker notification from your phone, with timestamps.
- Consider a protective order. If you know or suspect who placed it and you fear them, ask the clerk of court about a chapter 236 (domestic abuse) or chapter 236A (sexual abuse) petition.
- Get a sweep if needed. If one device turned up, a mechanic or private investigator can check for others, including hardwired units behind the dash.
![]()
Police can sometimes leave the device in place briefly to identify who is monitoring it, which is another reason to call before ripping it off.
Sources
- Iowa Code 708.11A, Unauthorized placement of a global positioning device, Iowa Legislature
- Iowa Code 708.11, Stalking, Iowa Legislature
- Iowa Code 808.4A, Application for search warrant, global positioning device, issuance, Iowa Legislature
- 2017 Iowa Acts chapter 83 (H.F. 263), Iowa Legislature
- 2023 Iowa Acts chapter 74 (S.F. 84), Iowa Legislature
- Iowa Code 902.9, Maximum sentence for felons, Iowa Legislature
- Iowa Code 903.1, Maximum sentence for misdemeanants, Iowa Legislature
- Iowa Code chapter 236A, Sexual abuse protective orders, Iowa Legislature
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), Legal Information Institute
- 18 U.S.C. 2261A, Stalking, Legal Information Institute
Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Laws change and outcomes depend on specific facts. If you are facing a GPS tracking issue in Iowa, consult a licensed Iowa attorney. If you are in immediate danger, call 911.
Related guides: GPS Tracking Laws by State | Iowa Recording Laws | Iowa Surveillance Camera Laws | Iowa Restraining Order Laws
More Iowa Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal to put a GPS tracker on someone's car in Iowa?
Yes, in most cases. Iowa Code 708.11A makes it a serious misdemeanor to place a GPS device on another person or an object without consent in order to track that person without a legitimate purpose. If the tracking is part of stalking, it becomes a class C felony under Iowa Code 708.11.
Can I put a tracker on my spouse's car in Iowa?
Not safely. If the car is titled solely to your spouse and they have not consented, placing a tracker risks a serious misdemeanor charge, and suspicion of cheating is not a legitimate purpose. If your spouse reports feeling afraid because of the monitoring, prosecutors can charge felony stalking. Joint ownership of the vehicle muddies the picture but does not guarantee protection.
Is tracking someone with an AirTag illegal in Iowa?
It can be, and you should assume it is. Iowa Code 708.11 defines a technological device to include a global positioning device or other electronic device that transmits electronic data, which reaches AirTags, Tile, and similar Bluetooth trackers, so using one as part of stalking is a class C felony. Whether the separate placement offense in Iowa Code 708.11A also applies is less certain, because that section covers only a global positioning device and an AirTag has no GPS receiver of its own. No Iowa appellate decision has settled that question.
What is the penalty for GPS stalking in Iowa?
Stalking while using a technological device, which expressly includes GPS, is a class C felony under Iowa Code 708.11(3)(a)(4). That carries up to 10 years in prison and a fine of $1,370 to $13,660, even for a first offense. That first-offense enhancement was added by 2023 Iowa Acts chapter 74.
Can a parent track their child's car in Iowa?
A parent tracking their own minor child, especially in a vehicle the parent owns, almost certainly has a legitimate purpose under 708.11A. Tracking an adult child, or using the child's tracker to monitor the other parent in a custody dispute, is far riskier and can support criminal charges or protective orders.
Can my employer put a GPS tracker on my personal car in Iowa?
Not without your consent. Iowa has no employer GPS statute, but hiding a tracker on an employee's personal vehicle falls under the general criminal prohibition in Iowa Code 708.11A. Tracking company-owned vehicles is lawful and common.
Do police need a warrant to put a GPS tracker on a car in Iowa?
Generally yes. In United States v. Jones (2012), the U.S. Supreme Court held that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and monitoring its movements is a search under the Fourth Amendment, so law enforcement typically needs a warrant. Iowa Code 808.4A sets out the state procedure: a peace officer applies to a magistrate, and on a finding of probable cause the warrant commands an officer to place, track, monitor, or remove the global positioning device.
Can I sue someone for tracking my car in Iowa?
Iowa has no specific GPS tracking lawsuit statute, but you can sue under the common-law tort of intrusion upon seclusion for secret monitoring of your movements, and you can seek a civil protective order. Report the device to police as well, since criminal charges and no-contact orders often move faster than a lawsuit.
Updates
Corrected the dates of two Iowa stalking amendments that had been transposed, clarified that the technological device definition and the first-offense class C felony both date to 2023, added Iowa Code 808.4A on GPS search warrants, and hedged the AirTag analysis under the GPS placement statute.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Iowa Code, Chapter 708: ASSAULT
§ 708.11AUnauthorized placement of global positioning device.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
1. A person commits unauthorized placement of a global positioning device when the person, without the consent of the other person, places a global positioning device on the other person or an object in order to track the movements of the other person without a legitimate purpose. 2. A person who commits a violation of this section commits a serious misdemeanor.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-26 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.iowa.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State of Iowa v. Joseph Thomas Gentile (Court of Appeals of Iowa 2024)“…positioning device, a serious misdemeanor, in violation of Iowa Code section 708.11A (2023). A related no-contact order barr…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Iowa Employee Monitoring Laws (2026): Workplace Surveillance Rights
§ 708.11Stalking.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
1. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires: a. “Accompanying offense” means any public offense committed as part of the course of conduct engaged in while committing the offense of stalking. b. “Course of conduct” means repeatedly maintaining a visual or physical proximity to a person without legitimate purpose, repeatedly utilizing a technological device to locate, listen to, or watch a person without authorization or legitimate purpose, or repeatedly conveying oral or written threats, threats implied by conduct, or a combination thereof, directed at or toward a person. c. “Immediate family member” means a spouse, parent, child, sibling, or any other person who regularly resides in the household of a specific person, or who within the prior six months regularly resided in the household of a specific person. d. “Repeatedly” means on two or more occasions. e. “Technological device” means any computer, cellular phone, smartphone, digital camera, video camera, audio recording device, global positioning device, or other electronic device that can be used for creating, storing, or transmitting information in the form of electronic data. 2.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.iowa.gov
Cited in 47 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Evans (Supreme Court of Iowa 2003, 671 N.W.2d 720)“…f first-degree harassment (Counts II-IV). See Iowa Code §§ 708.11 , 708.7 (2001). Whereas the stalking ch…”
- State of Iowa v. Christopher Raymond Lindell (Supreme Court of Iowa 2013, 828 N.W.2d 1)“…ly injury to, or the death of, the specific person.” See Iowa Code § 708.11 (2009). On December 15, 2010, Lindell…”
- State v. Neuzil (Supreme Court of Iowa 1999, 589 N.W.2d 708)“…lking in violation of a protective order. See Iowa Code § 708.11 (3)(b)(l) (1997). Because we conclude t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Iowa Code, Chapter 902: FELONIES
§ 902.9Maximum sentence for felons.In forcecited in 7 of our articles
1. The maximum sentence for any person convicted of a felony shall be that prescribed by statute or, if not prescribed by statute, if other than a class “A” felony shall be determined as follows: a. Reserved. b. A class “B” felon shall be confined for no more than twenty-five years. c. An habitual offender shall be confined for no more than fifteen years. d. A class “C” felon, not an habitual offender, shall be confined for no more than ten years, and in addition shall be sentenced to a fine of at least one thousand three hundred seventy dollars but not more than thirteen thousand six hundred sixty dollars. e. A class “D” felon, not an habitual offender, shall be confined for no more than five years, and in addition shall be sentenced to a fine of at least one thousand twenty-five dollars but not more than ten thousand two hundred forty-five dollars. 2. The surcharges required by sections 911.1, 911.2A, and 911.5 shall be added to a fine imposed on a class “C” or class “D” felon, as provided by those sections, and are not a part of or subject to the maximums set in this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.iowa.gov
Cited in 166 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State of Iowa v. Andre Letroy Antwan Harrington (Supreme Court of Iowa 2017)“…a sentence of incarceration greater than one year. See Iowa Code § 902.9(1)(a)–(e). Thus, any immigrati…”
- State v. Ayers (Supreme Court of Iowa 1999, 590 N.W.2d 25)“…imposed a $500 fine for each conviction. See Iowa Code §§ 902.9 (3), 903.1(2). Ayers appeals onl…”
- State v. Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County (Supreme Court of Iowa 2000, 616 N.W.2d 575)“…of incarceration not to exceed ten years. See Iowa Code § 902.9 (setting forth a maximum sentence of t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Iowa Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026), Iowa Video Recording Laws: Where You Can and Cannot Film (2026), Iowa Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026
Iowa Code, Chapter 903: MISDEMEANORS
§ 903.1Maximum sentence for misdemeanants.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
1. If a person eighteen years of age or older is convicted of a simple or serious misdemeanor and a specific penalty is not provided for or if a person under eighteen years of age has been waived to adult court pursuant to section 232.45 on a felony charge and is subsequently convicted of a simple, serious, or aggravated misdemeanor, the court shall determine the sentence, and shall fix the period of confinement or the amount of fine, which fine shall not be suspended by the court, within the following limits: a. For a simple misdemeanor, there shall be a fine of at least one hundred five dollars but not to exceed eight hundred fifty-five dollars. The court may order imprisonment not to exceed thirty days in lieu of a fine or in addition to a fine. b. For a serious misdemeanor, there shall be a fine of at least four hundred thirty dollars but not to exceed two thousand five hundred sixty dollars. In addition, the court may also order imprisonment not to exceed one year. 2. When a person is convicted of an aggravated misdemeanor, and a specific penalty is not provided for, the maximum penalty shall be imprisonment not to exceed two years.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.iowa.gov
Cited in 148 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Nicole Lara Shumate v. Drake University A/K/A Drake University Law School (Supreme Court of Iowa 2014, 846 N.W.2d 503)“…carceration, a fine of $625, and a criminal record. See Iowa Code § 903.1(1)(a). The legislature could reaso…”
- State v. Ayers (Supreme Court of Iowa 1999, 590 N.W.2d 25)“…ggravated misdemeanors, the general sentencing provision is Iowa Code section 903.1(2), which provides: When a perso…”
- State v. Kirchoff (Supreme Court of Iowa 1990, 452 N.W.2d 801)“…Kirchoff. See Iowa Code ch. 901 (sentencing procedures); Iowa Code §§ 903.1 (maximum sentence for misdemeanants),…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Iowa Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Iowa Code 709.21 Penalties (2026), Iowa Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide), Iowa Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
United States Code Title 18
§ 2261AStalkingIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
Whoever— travels in interstate or foreign commerce or is present within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or enters or leaves Indian country, with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel or presence engages in conduct that— places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to— that person; an immediate family member (as defined in section 115) of that person; a spouse or intimate partner of that person; or the pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse of that person; or causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to a person described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of subparagraph (A); or with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, uses the mail, any interactive computer service or electronic communication service or electronic communication system of interstate commerce, or any other…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 350 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Federal appeals courts have construed and upheld Section 2261A. United States v. Walker (2011) read in the course of, or as a result of such travel disjunctively, so pre-travel threats plus resulting fear sufficed. United States v. Amy Gonzalez (2018) held it neither overbroad nor vague and no First Amendment violation as applied.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Walker (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 2011, 665 F.3d 212)✓After emailing threats to his estranged wife, the defendant flew from Michigan to Puerto Rico and was arrested on arrival. The court read the disjunctive phrase in 2261A(1) to cover travel that itself places the target in reasonable fear, and upheld the stalking conviction.
- United States v. Amy Gonzalez (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2018, 905 F.3d 165)✓Relatives waged a years-long campaign against a mother that ended in a courthouse shooting. The court held 2261A is neither overbroad nor vague because it reaches harassing conduct, and that the mental states it lists are alternative means, not elements; convictions affirmed.
- United States v. Wills (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2003, 346 F.3d 476)✓A burglary suspect pursued the witness who identified him at a preliminary hearing; the witness later died. The court held the evidence met each element of 2261A: travel from D.C. to Virginia, intent to harm or harass, and reasonable fear of death; conviction affirmed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Colorado GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Florida GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): Iowa Code, Chapter 236A: SEXUAL ABUSE § 236A.1 (Short title.)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Iowa Code 708.11A, Unauthorized placement of a global positioning device(legis.iowa.gov)
- Iowa Code 708.11, Stalking(legis.iowa.gov)
- Iowa Code 902.9, Maximum sentence for felons(legis.iowa.gov)
- Iowa Code 903.1, Maximum sentence for misdemeanants(legis.iowa.gov)
- Iowa Code chapter 236A, Sexual abuse protective orders(legis.iowa.gov)
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012)(law.cornell.edu)
- 18 U.S.C. 2261A, Stalking(law.cornell.edu)
- Iowa Code 808.4A, Application for search warrant, global positioning device, issuance(legis.iowa.gov)
- 2017 Iowa Acts chapter 83 (H.F. 263), stalking and unauthorized placement of global positioning devices(legis.iowa.gov)
- 2023 Iowa Acts chapter 74 (S.F. 84), stalking utilizing a technological device(legis.iowa.gov)