Delaware
Delaware GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited June 17, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. How we verify our legal content
Delaware is one of the states that gives you a straight answer on GPS trackers. There is no need to stretch a wiretap law or an old surveillance statute to cover them. Since 2014, Delaware has had a criminal law aimed squarely at putting a location tracker on someone else's car.
That law is 11 Del. C. 1335(a)(8), part of Delaware's violation of privacy statute. Install an electronic or mechanical tracking device in or on a motor vehicle without the consent of the registered owner, lessor, or lessee, and you have committed a Class A misdemeanor. That carries up to a year in jail and a fine of up to $2,300.
This guide walks through what the statute actually says, who is allowed to track a vehicle, how the rules apply to employers, parents, and AirTags, and what to do if you find a tracker stuck to your own car.
Is It Legal to Put a GPS Tracker on a Car in Delaware?
It is legal to put a GPS tracker on a car you own or lease. It is a crime to put one on anyone else's car without the consent of the vehicle's registered owner, lessor, or lessee.
That is the whole framework. Delaware does not ask whether the tracker was cheap or expensive, hidden or visible, hardwired or magnetic. The statute turns on one question: did the person who controls the vehicle on paper agree to the device?
There are two carve-outs. Law enforcement officers may use trackers lawfully, which after United States v. Jones almost always means with a warrant. And a parent or legal guardian may install a tracker to follow the location of their minor child. Everyone else needs consent.
Delaware's Vehicle Tracking Law (11 Del. C. 1335(a)(8))
Delaware's violation of privacy statute, 11 Del. C. 1335, lists a series of acts that count as criminal invasions of privacy. Paragraph (a)(8), added in 2014, covers vehicle tracking.
![]()
A person is guilty when they knowingly install "an electronic or mechanical location tracking device in or on a motor vehicle without the consent of the registered owner, lessor or lessee of said vehicle." The paragraph then states that it does not apply to the lawful use of an electronic tracking device by a law enforcement officer, or to a parent or legal guardian who installs the device to track the location of their minor child.
A few details in that language matter in real cases.
First, the crime is the installation. The state does not have to prove you ever checked the tracker's location history. Sticking the device on the car without consent completes the offense.
Second, "in or on" a motor vehicle covers every common setup: a magnetic tracker under the bumper, a device plugged into the OBD port, and a unit hardwired behind the dash.
Third, consent belongs to the registered owner, lessor, or lessee. If the car is titled in your name, you can consent. If it is titled only in someone else's name, their permission is what counts, no matter how close your relationship is.
A violation of paragraph (a)(8) is a Class A misdemeanor under 11 Del. C. 1335(c). Delaware's sentencing statute, 11 Del. C. 4206, sets the maximum at 1 year of incarceration and a fine of up to $2,300.
Who Can Legally Track a Vehicle in Delaware
Owners, lessors, and lessees. You can track your own car. A rental company or leasing company, as lessor, can put trackers in its fleet. A business can track vehicles it owns or leases, including the ones employees drive. A lienholder that remains the titled owner or lessor of a financed vehicle can also fit within the consent language, which is why some auto lenders install GPS units on financed cars.
Parents and legal guardians of minors. Delaware wrote the parent exception directly into the statute, which many states never did. A parent or legal guardian may install a tracking device to follow the location of their minor child. The exception ends at adulthood. Once your child turns 18, tracking a car registered in their name without consent is no longer protected.
Law enforcement. Officers may use trackers when their use is lawful. The U.S. Supreme Court held in United States v. Jones that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and monitoring its movements is a Fourth Amendment search, so police normally need a warrant first.
Not private investigators. Delaware's vehicle tracking statute contains no PI exemption. An investigator hired for a divorce or infidelity case who slips a tracker onto a spouse's separately titled car commits a Class A misdemeanor, and so can the client who hired them, depending on the facts. Delaware's stalking statute does carry its own carve-out for legitimate licensed-investigator work, discussed below, but that exemption sits in a different section and does not make an unconsented vehicle tracker lawful.
One recurring gray area is the jointly titled family car. If both spouses are registered owners, one owner's consent to a tracker complicates any prosecution, because an owner of the vehicle did consent. If the car is titled in one spouse's name alone, the analysis is simple: the other spouse needs permission like anyone else.
Can My Employer Track My Car in Delaware?
It depends on whose car it is.
If you drive a company vehicle, your employer is the registered owner or lessee, so the consent requirement of 1335(a)(8) is satisfied by the employer's own consent. Tracking company fleet vehicles is lawful in Delaware, and it is standard practice in delivery, trades, and field service work.
Your personal car is different. An employer that installs a tracker on a vehicle you own, without your consent, violates 1335(a)(8) just like a stranger would. Employers that want location data from personal vehicles typically use a phone app or a signed agreement instead, and your written consent resolves the statute.
Delaware also has a workplace monitoring notice law, 19 Del. C. 705. It requires employers to give notice before monitoring telephone calls, email, or internet usage, with a civil penalty of $100 per violation. The statute does not expressly mention GPS or vehicle tracking, so its notice duty does not clearly extend to fleet trackers. Careful Delaware employers disclose vehicle tracking in writing anyway.
AirTags and Item Trackers
Apple AirTags, Tiles, and similar item trackers are legal to buy and use in Delaware for their intended purpose: finding your keys, your luggage, or your own car.
![]()
Notice what 1335(a)(8) covers, though. It applies to devices installed in or on a motor vehicle. An AirTag dropped into someone's purse, backpack, or coat pocket is not covered by that paragraph. That does not make it legal.
Using any device to repeatedly monitor a person without their consent runs into Delaware's stalking statute, 11 Del. C. 1312. Stalking is a course of conduct, meaning three or more separate incidents, in which a person "by any action, method, device, or means" follows, monitors, observes, or surveys another person, when that conduct would cause a reasonable person to fear injury or suffer significant mental anguish. A hidden AirTag that feeds you someone's location day after day fits that language, and an AirTag slipped into a car's seat pocket can violate both statutes.
The stalking statute has one exemption worth knowing about. Subsection 1312(j) says the section "shall not apply to conduct which occurs in furtherance of legitimate activities of law-enforcement, private investigators, security officers or private detectives as those activities are defined in Chapter 13 of Title 24." So a licensed investigator doing legitimate licensed work is outside the stalking statute, even though the vehicle tracking paragraph in 1335(a)(8) has no such exception and still applies to that investigator.
Stalking is a Class E felony in Delaware, and federal law adds another layer. The federal stalking statute, 18 U.S.C. 2261A, covers using electronic systems to engage in a course of conduct that places a person in fear or causes substantial emotional distress, including across state lines.
Penalties for Illegal GPS Tracking in Delaware
| Offense | Statute | Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Installing a tracker on a vehicle without consent | 11 Del. C. 1335(a)(8) | Class A misdemeanor | 1 year incarceration, $2,300 fine |
| Stalking | 11 Del. C. 1312 | Class E felony | 5 years in prison |
| Stalking with aggravating factors (protective order violation, victim 62 or older, threats, physical injury, or victim under 14 with offender 21 or older) | 11 Del. C. 1312 | Class D felony | 8 years in prison |
| Stalking with a deadly weapon or causing serious physical injury | 11 Del. C. 1312 | Class C felony | 15 years in prison |
| Federal stalking | 18 U.S.C. 2261A | Federal felony | 5 years or more depending on harm |
Prosecutors are not limited to one charge. A tracker planted during a campaign of following and harassment can support both the misdemeanor installation count and a felony stalking count.
Civil Lawsuits and Protective Orders
Section 1335 is a criminal statute and does not create its own right to sue. But Delaware courts recognize the privacy tort of intrusion upon seclusion, and secretly tracking someone's movements is the kind of intentional intrusion into private affairs that the tort was built for. A victim can seek damages in civil court, and the tracker itself is powerful evidence.
If the person tracking you is a current or former spouse, partner, household member, or someone you dated, you can petition Delaware Family Court for a Protection From Abuse order. The Delaware courts' PFA process can order the person to stay away from you, stop all contact, and surrender devices, and violating a PFA order is itself a crime that also elevates a stalking charge to a Class D felony.
Outside domestic relationships, report the conduct to police. Criminal no-contact orders can issue as part of a stalking prosecution.
What to Do If You Find a Tracker on Your Car
Stay calm and think about evidence before you think about the device.
![]()
- Photograph it in place. Take pictures of where it sits, how it is mounted, and any visible serial numbers before touching anything.
- Do not destroy it. The device, its serial number, and the account it is paired to are how police identify who planted it.
- You may remove it from your own vehicle. It is your car. Removing a device someone else hid on it is not a crime. Many police departments prefer you leave it in place until an officer sees it, so call first if you safely can.
- Report it. Tell the police you believe someone violated 11 Del. C. 1335(a)(8), and mention any history of following, harassment, or threats, since that pattern supports a stalking charge.
- Think about safety, not just the device. If you suspect a current or former partner, contact a domestic violence advocate before confronting them, and consider a PFA petition. Call 911 if you are in immediate danger.
If your phone alerts you that an unknown AirTag is traveling with you, follow the alert's instructions to locate it and capture its serial number, then make the same police report.
For the rules on audio and video recording rather than location tracking, see our guide to Delaware recording laws. For camera placement rules at home and work, see surveillance camera laws by state. If you need court protection from someone tracking or following you, start with Delaware restraining order laws. To compare how other states treat trackers, see GPS Tracking Laws by State.
Sources
- 11 Del. C. 1335, Violation of Privacy (Delaware Code Online)
- 11 Del. C. 1312, Stalking (Delaware Code Online)
- 11 Del. C. 4205-4206, Sentences for Felonies and Misdemeanors (Delaware Code Online)
- 19 Del. C. 705, Notice of Monitoring of Telephone, Email and Internet Usage (Delaware Code Online)
- 18 U.S.C. 2261A, Stalking (Cornell Legal Information Institute)
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012) (Cornell Legal Information Institute)
- Protection From Abuse Orders (Delaware Family Court)
Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Laws change, and how they apply depends on your specific facts. If you are dealing with a tracking or stalking situation, or facing a criminal charge, talk to a licensed Delaware attorney, and call 911 if you are in immediate danger.
More Delaware Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to put a GPS tracker on my spouse's car in Delaware?
Only if you are a registered owner or lessee of that car, or your spouse consents. If the car is titled solely in your spouse's name, installing a tracker without their permission is a Class A misdemeanor under 11 Del. C. 1335(a)(8), even during a divorce.
Can parents track their child's car in Delaware?
Yes. Delaware's statute contains an express exception allowing a parent or legal guardian to install a tracking device to follow the location of a minor child. The exception ends when the child turns 18.
Can a private investigator legally put a tracker on a car in Delaware?
No. Delaware's vehicle tracking law has no private investigator exemption. A PI needs the consent of the vehicle's registered owner, lessor, or lessee just like anyone else. Delaware's stalking statute is different: 11 Del. C. 1312(j) exempts conduct in furtherance of the legitimate activities of licensed private investigators, security officers, and private detectives, so a licensed investigator doing legitimate work is outside the stalking statute while still being bound by 1335(a)(8).
Are AirTags illegal in Delaware?
Owning and using an AirTag to track your own belongings is legal. Hiding one to follow a person can be stalking under 11 Del. C. 1312, a Class E felony, and placing one in or on someone's vehicle can also violate 11 Del. C. 1335(a)(8).
Can my employer GPS-track my personal car?
Not without your consent. The employer is not the registered owner, lessor, or lessee of your personal vehicle, so installing a tracker without permission violates 1335(a)(8). Company-owned vehicles are different, and employers may track those.
Do police need a warrant to put a GPS tracker on a car?
Generally yes. In United States v. Jones (2012), the U.S. Supreme Court held that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and monitoring its movements is a Fourth Amendment search, which normally requires a warrant.
What is the penalty for illegal GPS tracking in Delaware?
Installing a tracker on a vehicle without consent is a Class A misdemeanor punishable by up to 1 year of incarceration and a fine of up to $2,300. If the tracking is part of a pattern of monitoring or following, stalking charges start at a Class E felony with up to 5 years in prison.
Can I remove a GPS tracker I find on my car?
Yes. You may remove a device someone hid on your own vehicle. Photograph it in place first and do not destroy it, because the device and its serial number are the evidence police use to identify who installed it.
Updates
Clarified that Delaware's stalking statute (11 Del. C. 1312(j)) exempts the legitimate activities of licensed private investigators, security officers, and private detectives, while the vehicle tracking law (11 Del. C. 1335(a)(8)) still contains no private investigator exception.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Delaware Code, Title 11 (Crimes and Criminal Procedure), Chapter 005 (SPECIFIC OFFENSES)
§ 1335Violation of privacy; class A misdemeanor; class G felony.In forcecited in 19 of our articles
(a) A person is guilty of violation of privacy when, except as authorized by law, the person: (1) Trespasses on property intending to subject anyone to eavesdropping or other surveillance in a private place; or (2) Installs in any private place, without consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy there, any device for observing, photographing, recording, amplifying or broadcasting sounds or events in that place; or (3) Installs or uses outside a private place any device for hearing, recording, amplifying or broadcasting sounds originating in that place which would not ordinarily be audible or comprehensible outside, without the consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy there; or (4) Intercepts without the consent of all parties thereto a message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of communicating privately, including private conversation; or (5) Divulges without the consent of the sender and the receiver the existence or contents of any message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of communicating privately if the accused knows that the message was unlawfully intercepted or if the accused learned of the message in the course of…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Cited in 15 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Pulgini (1976) held 11 Del. C. 1335 does not reach police acts covered by sections 1336 and 1431, so a police interception made with one party's consent was lawful. State of Delaware v. Steven Wu (2026) construed 1335(a)(9)(b) as protecting confidentiality from third parties regardless of whether the relationship has ended.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Pulgini (Superior Court of Delaware 1976, 366 A.2d 1198)✓Police recorded a call between the defendant and an informant with the informant's consent but no court order. The court held section 1335 does not apply to police acts covered by sections 1336 and 1431, and one-party consent made the interception lawful.
- State of Delaware v. Steven Wu (Delaware Court of Common Pleas 2026)✓Charged after leaving printed intimate photos from a past affair in the woman's shared mailbox, a man sought a pretrial ruling on section 1335(a)(9)(b). On uncontested facts, the court read beyond that relationship as disclosure outside the private relationship, ended or not.
- Duffy v. State (Supreme Court of Delaware 2019)“…er 2017, Duffy was indicted for Violation of Privacy under 11 Del. C. § 1335(a)(7). The charges arose from Duffy tak…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Delaware Video Recording Laws: Consent Rules, Surveillance, and Penalties (2026), Delaware Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Privacy Protections (2026), Federal Wiretap Act and ECPA: The Complete Guide (2026)
§ 1312Stalking; class E felony, class D felony, class C felony.In force
(a) A person is guilty of stalking when the person knowingly engages in a course of conduct directed at a specific person and that conduct would cause a reasonable person to: (1) Fear physical injury to that person or that of another person; or (2) Suffer other significant mental anguish or distress that may, but does not necessarily, require medical or other professional treatment or counseling. (b) A violation of subsection (a) of this section is a class E felony. (c) Stalking is a class D felony if a person is guilty of stalking and 1 or more of the following exists: (1) The person is age 21 or older and the victim is under the age of 14; or (2) The person violated any order prohibiting contact with the victim; or (3) The victim is age 62 years of age or older; or (4) The course of conduct includes a threat of death or threat of serious physical injury to the victim, or to another person; or (5) The person causes physical injury to the victim.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Cited in 15 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Jewell v. State (Supreme Court of Delaware 2025)“…39 subjective-intent requirement into 11 Del. C. § 1312. A construction of the statute that do…”
- State v. Reeves (Superior Court of Delaware 2024)“…e raises an issue of first impression in Delaware – whether 11 Del.C. § 1312 (the “Statute” or “Section 1312”) is fa…”
- Woody v. State (Supreme Court of Delaware 2019)“…rime contemplated by the search warrant is stalking. Under 11 Del. C. § 1312, “[a] person is guilty of stalking when…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Delaware Code, Title 11 (Crimes and Criminal Procedure), Chapter 042 (CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENSES; SENTENCES)
§ 4205Sentence for felonies.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) A sentence of incarceration for a felony shall be a definite sentence. (b) The term of incarceration which the court may impose for a felony is fixed as follows: (1) For a class A felony not less than 15 years up to life imprisonment to be served at Level V except for conviction of first degree murder in which event § 4209 of this title shall apply. (2) For a class B felony not less than 2 years up to 25 years to be served at Level V. (3) For a class C felony up to 15 years to be served at Level V. (4) For a class D felony up to 8 years to be served at Level V. (5) For a class E felony up to 5 years to be served at Level V. (6) For a class F felony up to 3 years to be served at Level V. (7) For a class G felony up to 2 years to be served at Level V. (c) In the case of the conviction of any felony, the court shall impose a sentence of Level V incarceration where a minimum sentence is required by subsection (b) of this section and may impose a sentence of Level V incarceration up to the maximum stated in subsection (b) of this section for each class of felony.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Cited in 188 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Barnes (Supreme Court of Delaware 2015, 116 A.3d 883)“…isions.4 Most relevant to this appeal, the TIS Act amended 11 Del. C. § 4205 to state, “[n]o sentence to Level V inc…”
- Broomer v. State (Supreme Court of Delaware 2026)“…(providing that second-degree murder is a class A felony); 11 Del. C. § 4205(b)(1) (defining the sentencing range fo…”
- Wheeler v. State (Supreme Court of Delaware 2025)“…ear Level V sentence if the victim was sixty-two or older); 11 Del. C. § 4205(b)(2) (2018) (providing that the senten…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Delaware Hit and Run Laws, Delaware AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026), Delaware Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
Delaware Code, Title 19 (Labor), Chapter 007 (EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES)
§ 705Notice of monitoring of telephone transmissions, electronic mail and Internet usage.In forcecited in 10 of our articles
(a) As used in this section, “employer” includes any individual, corporation, partnership, firm or association with a place of business in Delaware and the State of Delaware or any agency or political subdivision thereof. (b) No employer, nor any agent or any representative of any employer, shall monitor or otherwise intercept any telephone conversation or transmission, electronic mail or transmission, or Internet access or usage of or by a Delaware employee unless the employer either: (1) Provides an electronic notice of such monitoring or intercepting policies or activities to the employee at least once during each day the employee accesses the employer-provided e-mail or Internet access services; or (2) Has first given a 1-time notice to the employee of such monitoring or intercepting activity or policies. The notice required by this paragraph shall be in writing, in an electronic record, or in another electronic form and acknowledged by the employee either in writing or electronically. The notice required by this subsection shall not apply to activities of any law-enforcement officer acting under the order of a court issued pursuant to Chapter 24 of Title 11.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2013
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In re Information Management Services, Inc. Derivative Litigation (Court of Chancery of Delaware 2013, 81 A.3d 278)“…r (ii) obtain written consent from the monitored employees. 19 Del. C. § 705(b). Although the court need not reach t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Surveillance Camera Laws by State (2026 Guide), Workplace Surveillance Camera Laws: Employee Guide, Delaware Recording Laws (2026): Two-Statute Consent Conflict
United States Code Title 18
§ 2261AStalkingIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
Whoever— travels in interstate or foreign commerce or is present within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or enters or leaves Indian country, with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel or presence engages in conduct that— places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to— that person; an immediate family member (as defined in section 115) of that person; a spouse or intimate partner of that person; or the pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse of that person; or causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to a person described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of subparagraph (A); or with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, uses the mail, any interactive computer service or electronic communication service or electronic communication system of interstate commerce, or any other…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 350 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Federal appeals courts have construed and upheld Section 2261A. United States v. Walker (2011) read in the course of, or as a result of such travel disjunctively, so pre-travel threats plus resulting fear sufficed. United States v. Amy Gonzalez (2018) held it neither overbroad nor vague and no First Amendment violation as applied.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Walker (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 2011, 665 F.3d 212)✓After emailing threats to his estranged wife, the defendant flew from Michigan to Puerto Rico and was arrested on arrival. The court read the disjunctive phrase in 2261A(1) to cover travel that itself places the target in reasonable fear, and upheld the stalking conviction.
- United States v. Amy Gonzalez (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2018, 905 F.3d 165)✓Relatives waged a years-long campaign against a mother that ended in a courthouse shooting. The court held 2261A is neither overbroad nor vague because it reaches harassing conduct, and that the mental states it lists are alternative means, not elements; convictions affirmed.
- United States v. Wills (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2003, 346 F.3d 476)✓A burglary suspect pursued the witness who identified him at a preliminary hearing; the witness later died. The court held the evidence met each element of 2261A: travel from D.C. to Virginia, intent to harm or harass, and reasonable fear of death; conviction affirmed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Colorado GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Florida GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- 11 Del. C. 1335, Violation of Privacy(delcode.delaware.gov)
- 11 Del. C. 1312, Stalking(delcode.delaware.gov)
- 11 Del. C. 4205-4206, Sentences for Felonies and Misdemeanors(delcode.delaware.gov)
- 19 Del. C. 705, Notice of Monitoring of Telephone, Email and Internet Usage(delcode.delaware.gov)
- 18 U.S.C. 2261A, Stalking(law.cornell.edu)
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012)(law.cornell.edu)
- Protection From Abuse Orders, Delaware Family Court(courts.delaware.gov)