Delaware
Delaware Nursing Home Camera Laws (2026): No Statute Found
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 14, 2026). · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Delaware has no statute, regulation, or state-run program addressing cameras in a nursing home or long-term care resident's room. A direct sweep of Delaware's long-term-care licensing chapter, all ten subchapters, found no provision on the subject anywhere.
Information last verified on 2026-08-14. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
This page covers what a direct sweep of Delaware's long-term-care law confirms and does not confirm about cameras, how Delaware's two overlapping recording-consent statutes apply to a monitoring device, and where a family stands today. It does not cover general home-security cameras; see Delaware Recording Laws for the full detail on the state's consent-law conflict.
A Confirmed Negative Across Delaware's Full Long-Term-Care Chapter
Delaware has no statute, regulation, or state-run program authorizing, governing, or addressing electronic monitoring in a nursing home or long-term-care resident's room. This conclusion comes from a direct check of Title 16, Chapter 11, "Long-Term Care Facilities and Services," across all ten of its subchapters, not an inference from an absent search result.
Subchapter II, Rights of Residents, is the section most likely to house a camera provision if one existed anywhere in Delaware law. Its 42 numbered rights grant a resident privacy in their own room, including a knock-before-entry expectation, along with rights to private visitation, communication, mail, phone access, and personal property. None of those 42 rights addresses electronic monitoring, cameras, video, or audio recording devices. Subchapter VI, which establishes the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsperson and its investigative and facility-access powers, likewise contains no mention of cameras or resident monitoring devices among its enumerated duties. The remaining subchapters cover licensing, abuse and neglect reporting, background checks, staffing levels, and dementia care, none of which touch monitoring devices either.
A current search of Delaware's pending legislation, cross-checked against the Delaware Health Care Facilities Association's own bill tracker (a source an interested nursing-facility trade group actively maintains and would very likely flag a camera bill in), turned up several current long-term-care bills on background checks, resident-rights anti-discrimination language, and a new vulnerable-adult-safety offense, but none concerning electronic monitoring or cameras.
Delaware's Recording-Consent Law: Two Statutes, Not One
Installing a camera in a resident's room raises a genuinely more complicated question in Delaware than in most states, because two separate statutes bear on it and they point in different directions rather than giving one clean rule. 11 Del. C. § 2402, the state's wiretapping and electronic surveillance statute, permits recording a communication with the consent of just one party to it, including the person doing the recording. Read alone, that would make Delaware a one-party consent state.

But a separate statute, 11 Del. C. § 1335, Delaware's privacy offense, has two distinct branches and only one of them is about audio. Under § 1335(a)(2), a person violates the section by installing in any private place, without consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy there, any device for observing, photographing, recording, amplifying or broadcasting sounds or events in that place. The words "or events" matter: a silent video camera installed without the consent of a person entitled to privacy in that room breaks this provision on its own, with no audio and no interception question involved. A different branch, § 1335(a)(4), bars intercepting a message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of communicating privately, including private conversation, without the consent of all parties. That branch carries no private-place element and reaches an interception wherever it happens.
Two details decide how this lands in a nursing home. First, the test in the installation branch is the consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy there, not the consent of everyone present in the room. A resident is plainly entitled to privacy in their own room, so the resident's own consent goes to the heart of that test, while a staff member simply working in the room is not automatically a consent-holder. A roommate is the person most likely to be the real obstacle, because a roommate is equally entitled to privacy in the shared room and a resident cannot consent away a roommate's interest. Second, "private place" is a defined term. 11 Del. C. § 1337 defines it as a place where one may reasonably expect to be safe from casual or hostile intrusion or surveillance, but not a place to which the public or a substantial group has access. A resident's room fits that definition far more readily than a facility hallway or day room does.
No Delaware court has resolved how § 1335 and § 2402 interact on the audio question. Our site's own Delaware recording-laws page treats that as an unresolved conflict and recommends readers treat Delaware as effectively an all-party consent jurisdiction for recorded conversation, rather than relying on § 2402's one-party language alone. For the full detail on this conflict, including the criminal penalties attached to each statute, see Delaware Recording Laws.
What Fills the Gap Today
Because no Delaware law addresses nursing-home cameras specifically, three things determine what actually happens with a monitoring device today. First, the facility's own admission agreement and internal policy controls whether a camera is permitted at all. Second, the federal layer offers no answer: federal nursing facility rules under 42 CFR Part 483 govern staffing and care planning, not a family's own recording equipment, confirmed by reading the regulation's text directly rather than assumed from its silence. Third, 11 Del. C. § 1335 applies to the device itself and not only to what it hears: the installation branch reaches a camera placed in a private place without the consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy there, and the separate interception branch adds an all-party consent question to any private conversation the device captures. Both are materially higher-stakes questions in Delaware than in a state with a single, unambiguous consent rule.
Using Camera Footage as Evidence of Abuse or Neglect
Where a facility has permitted a camera as a matter of its own policy, resulting footage can support a report to the Delaware Long-Term Care Ombudsperson or a civil claim for abuse or neglect. Footage on its own typically does not resolve a claim; it is reviewed together with the resident's medical records, staffing documentation, and care plan.

Harmed by a product or exposure? Speak with an attorney about your options
If you or a loved one may have been harmed, you can speak with an attorney about your legal options at no cost. Whether you have a claim depends on the specific facts. This is attorney advertising, not a guarantee that you qualify or of any particular outcome.
Getting Help: The Long-Term Care Ombudsperson
Delaware's Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsperson, established under 16 Del. C. § 1150 pursuant to the Older Americans Act, investigates complaints of abuse, neglect, and rights violations in long-term care facilities and can help a family navigate a facility that declines a monitoring request. The program operates under the Department of Health and Social Services.

Related Resources
- Nursing Home Camera Laws by State covers the 18 states with an enacted electronic-monitoring statute and how Delaware's no-statute status fits by comparison.
- Delaware Recording Laws covers the state's two-statute consent conflict in full detail for any recorded conversation.
- Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect covers how an abuse or neglect claim works once evidence, including camera footage, is in hand.
- Surveillance Camera Laws by State covers the general legal framework for security and hidden cameras outside a nursing facility setting.
Last updated: 2026-08-14. This sweep reflects Delaware law as of this date.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Delaware have a law allowing cameras in nursing home rooms?
No. A direct check of Delaware's full long-term-care licensing chapter, Title 16, Chapter 11, found no provision addressing cameras or electronic monitoring in any of its ten subchapters.
Can a Delaware nursing home refuse to let me install a camera?
Yes. With no Delaware law creating a right to a personal camera, a facility can permit, condition, or refuse a request as a matter of its own admission agreement and policy.
Is Delaware a one-party or all-party consent state for recording audio?
Delaware has two statutes that point in different directions. 11 Del. C. § 2402 permits recording with just one party's consent, but 11 Del. C. § 1335(a)(4) separately bars intercepting a private conversation without the consent of all parties, and no court has resolved the conflict. Treat a recorded conversation in a nursing home room with the more cautious all-party approach.
Can a silent video camera with no microphone still break Delaware law?
It can. 11 Del. C. § 1335(a)(2) bars installing in any private place, without consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy there, any device for observing, photographing, recording, amplifying or broadcasting sounds or events in that place. Because it reaches events and not only sounds, a camera that records no audio is covered. The test is the consent of the people entitled to privacy in that room, which in a shared room includes the roommate, not the consent of everyone who happens to be present.
Does federal law require nursing homes to allow cameras?
No. Federal nursing facility regulations under 42 CFR Part 483 govern staffing and care planning, not a family's own recording equipment, in Delaware or any state.
Is there a bill pending in Delaware to create a camera right?
No bill addressing electronic monitoring or cameras in nursing facilities was found in a current search of pending Delaware legislation, including the state's own nursing-facility trade association's bill tracker.
Updates
Corrected the article's description of 11 Del. C. § 1335: the installation branch turns on the consent of the people entitled to privacy in the room rather than everyone present, it reaches a silent video camera and not only audio, and the all-party standard and the private-place element are now placed on the correct subsections, with the § 1337 definition of private place added.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Delaware Code, Title 11 (Crimes and Criminal Procedure), Chapter 005 (SPECIFIC OFFENSES)
§ 1335Violation of privacy; class A misdemeanor; class G felony.In forcecited in 19 of our articles
(a) A person is guilty of violation of privacy when, except as authorized by law, the person: (1) Trespasses on property intending to subject anyone to eavesdropping or other surveillance in a private place; or (2) Installs in any private place, without consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy there, any device for observing, photographing, recording, amplifying or broadcasting sounds or events in that place; or (3) Installs or uses outside a private place any device for hearing, recording, amplifying or broadcasting sounds originating in that place which would not ordinarily be audible or comprehensible outside, without the consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy there; or (4) Intercepts without the consent of all parties thereto a message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of communicating privately, including private conversation; or (5) Divulges without the consent of the sender and the receiver the existence or contents of any message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of communicating privately if the accused knows that the message was unlawfully intercepted or if the accused learned of the message in the course of…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Cited in 15 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Pulgini (1976) held 11 Del. C. 1335 does not reach police acts covered by sections 1336 and 1431, so a police interception made with one party's consent was lawful. State of Delaware v. Steven Wu (2026) construed 1335(a)(9)(b) as protecting confidentiality from third parties regardless of whether the relationship has ended.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Pulgini (Superior Court of Delaware 1976, 366 A.2d 1198)✓Police recorded a call between the defendant and an informant with the informant's consent but no court order. The court held section 1335 does not apply to police acts covered by sections 1336 and 1431, and one-party consent made the interception lawful.
- State of Delaware v. Steven Wu (Delaware Court of Common Pleas 2026)✓Charged after leaving printed intimate photos from a past affair in the woman's shared mailbox, a man sought a pretrial ruling on section 1335(a)(9)(b). On uncontested facts, the court read beyond that relationship as disclosure outside the private relationship, ended or not.
- Duffy v. State (Supreme Court of Delaware 2019)“…er 2017, Duffy was indicted for Violation of Privacy under 11 Del. C. § 1335(a)(7). The charges arose from Duffy tak…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Delaware GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Delaware Video Recording Laws: Consent Rules, Surveillance, and Penalties (2026), Delaware Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Privacy Protections (2026)
Delaware Code, Title 11 (Crimes and Criminal Procedure), Chapter 024 (WIRETAPPING, ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE AND INTERCEPTION OF COMMUNICATIONS)
§ 2402Interception of communications generally; divulging contents of communications, violations of chapter.In forcecited in 17 of our articles
(a) Prohibited acts. — Except as specifically provided in this chapter or elsewhere in this Code no person shall: (1) Intentionally intercept, endeavor to intercept, or procure any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept any wire, oral or electronic communication; (2) Intentionally disclose or endeavor to disclose to any other person the contents of any wire, oral or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication in violation of this chapter; or (3) Intentionally use or endeavor to use the contents of any wire, oral or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication in violation of this chapter. (b) Penalties for violation of subsection (a) of this section. — Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be guilty of a class E felony and be fined not more than $10,000. (c) Lawful acts.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Dayton v. Collison (2020) applied 11 Del. C. 2402(a)(1), finding neighbors intercepted a homeowner's backyard conversations with a motion-activated video camera, an intrusion upon seclusion. State v. Hunt (2023) said in the alternative that police access to a consenting owner's phone, if an interception, was lawful under 2402(c)(3).
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dayton v. Collison (Superior Court of Delaware 2020)✓Neighbors aimed a motion-activated audio and video camera at a man's backyard and recorded his conversations there; after trial the court found they intentionally intercepted oral communications in violation of section 2402(a), and that this was an intrusion on his seclusion.
- Everett v. State (Supreme Court of Delaware 2018, 186 A.3d 1224)“…d or a location was bugged, and a host of other details.”); 11 Del. C. § 2402(c)(3) (authorizing government wiretappi…”
- State v. Hunt (Superior Court of Delaware 2023)✓Police read and answered texts on a cooperating witness's phone with his permission; rejecting a postconviction claim, the court found no interception occurred and reasoned in the alternative that any interception in the drug investigation was lawful under section 2402(c)(3).
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Delaware Recording Laws (2026): Two-Statute Consent Conflict, Delaware Landlord-Tenant Recording Laws: Surveillance, Privacy Rights, and Legal Limits (2026), Federal Wiretap Act and ECPA: The Complete Guide (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- 16 Del. C. Chapter 11, Subchapter II, Rights of Residents, §§ 1121-1127(delcode.delaware.gov).gov
- 16 Del. C. Chapter 11, Subchapter VI, Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsperson, §§ 1150-1156(delcode.delaware.gov).gov
- 11 Del. C. § 2402, Interception and disclosure of wire, oral or electronic communications(delcode.delaware.gov).gov
- 11 Del. C. § 1335, Violation of privacy(delcode.delaware.gov).gov
- Delaware Health Care Facilities Association, Legislation and Bills to Watch (current-session long-term care bill tracker)(dhcfa.org)
- Delaware Recording Laws, recordinglaw.com(recordinglaw.com)
- 11 Del. C. § 1337, Definitions (defining "private place" for the violation-of-privacy offense)(delcode.delaware.gov)