West Virginia
West Virginia Employee Monitoring Laws: Workplace Surveillance and Social Media (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content
West Virginia employers can generally monitor work email, phone lines, and computer systems, and because West Virginia is a one-party consent state, a supervisor who participates in a call can record it without telling anyone else. State law draws three firm, genuinely state-specific lines on top of that baseline: employers cannot demand access to an employee's personal social media, cannot point a camera or microphone into a restroom, locker room, dressing room, or employee lounge, and cannot monitor calls between an employee and a customer without first notifying the employee and providing a phone for personal use that is not monitored.
This article provides general legal information about West Virginia employee monitoring law as of July 9, 2026. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult a West Virginia-licensed attorney about your specific situation.
Scope: This article covers West Virginia law on an employer's authority to monitor employees, access personal social media, and conduct workplace video, GPS, and biometric monitoring. It does not re-derive West Virginia's one-party consent recording rules (see our West Virginia recording laws guide and West Virginia workplace recording laws guide) or GPS law generally outside the employment context (see our West Virginia GPS tracking laws guide).
The Federal Baseline: the "Ordinary Course of Business" Exception
West Virginia's starting point for any workplace monitoring question is federal, not state, law. Title I of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act makes it unlawful to intentionally intercept wire, oral, or electronic communications without consent (18 U.S.C. § 2511, part of the Title I scheme at sections 2510-2523), but the statute carves out a broad exception for the owner of a communications system. Under the 'business extension' exemption in 18 U.S.C. section 2510(5)(a), equipment an employer furnishes and uses in the ordinary course of its business, a category courts have extended to the phone, email, and computer systems its staff use, falls outside the Act's definition of a regulated interception device, letting employers intercept communications on that system in the ordinary course of business.
The leading case applying this exception is Watkins v. L.M. Berry & Co., 704 F.2d 577 (11th Cir. 1983), where an employer monitored a sales line as part of a standing training program. The court held that once a monitored call is determined to be personal rather than business-related, the employer's ordinary-course exception generally ends, and continued listening can create liability.
The federal exception matters most where the employer is not itself a participant, such as automated review of stored email or internet-activity logs; a participating manager can already record under West Virginia's own one-party consent rule, covered below.
Does West Virginia Require Notice Before Electronic Monitoring?
No, not as a general matter, but one common practice does carry a statutory notice duty. Connecticut, Delaware, New York, and (starting in 2026) Maine require employers to give employees written or posted notice before monitoring phone, email, or internet use on the job. West Virginia has not enacted a comparable general-purpose statute, so a West Virginia employer can generally monitor employer-owned email, internet, and computer systems relying on the federal ordinary-course exception, without a state-mandated notice step. Monitoring an employee's calls with customers is the exception, and it is covered next.
That does not mean West Virginia law is silent on employee monitoring. Three narrower, genuinely state-specific statutes fill part of the gap: a notice-and-unmonitored-phone requirement for monitoring calls with customers, covered next, a ban on employers accessing personal social media, and a hard prohibition on surveillance in sensitive workplace spaces.
Monitoring Calls With Customers: W. Va. Code Section 61-3-24C
West Virginia does have one call-monitoring notice statute, and it is easy to miss because it sits in the criminal code rather than the labor chapter. W. Va. Code section 61-3-24C makes it unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to intercept or monitor, or attempt to intercept or monitor, the transmission of a message, signal, or other communication by telephone between its own employee or agent and a customer, unless it does all of the following: notifies each employee or agent subject to interception or monitoring that their telephone messages are subject to interception or monitoring, and provides telephone instruments for the employee's personal use that are not subject to interception or monitoring.
The two conditions are conjunctive. An employer that posts a call-monitoring notice but leaves its staff with no unmonitored telephone for personal calls has not satisfied the statute. A violation is a misdemeanor carrying a fine of not less than $50 nor more than $200, imprisonment in the county jail for up to one year, or both. The section expressly does not require marking telephone instruments, and it does not reach monitoring engaged in solely for law enforcement purposes that is lawful in all other respects.
Note what section 61-3-24C does and does not do. The notice runs to the employee, not to the customer, so it is an employee-notice duty rather than a two-party consent rule, and it reaches calls between staff and customers rather than internal calls, company email, or general internet use. For a call center, a service desk, or any team that handles customer calls, it is the most concrete monitoring obligation in West Virginia law.
West Virginia's Employee Social Media Privacy Law
West Virginia's Employee Personal Social Media Act, W. Va. Code section 21-5H-1, enacted in 2016, prohibits an employer from requiring, requesting, or coercing an employee or applicant to disclose a username, password, or other authentication information for a personal account, or to access that account in the employer's presence. Employers also cannot compel an employee to add a supervisor as a contact able to view the account, or require changing its privacy settings.
A "personal account" is one used exclusively for personal communications unrelated to any business purpose, distinguishing it from an employer-issued social media account. Real exceptions apply: an employer can still access information about an employee that is already publicly available, comply with other applicable laws, require credentials for an employer-provided account or device, and request specific content from a personal account when investigating misconduct such as harassment or the unauthorized transfer of proprietary information. Nothing in the statute limits an employer's separate duty to investigate harassment complaints under other parts of the West Virginia Code.
Sensitive-Area Surveillance Ban: W. Va. Code Section 21-3-20
West Virginia's most distinctive employee-monitoring protection is not a notice statute at all. W. Va. Code section 21-3-20 prohibits any employer, public or private, from operating electronic surveillance, including closed-circuit television or video recorders, in areas designed for employee health, comfort, or personal security: restrooms, shower rooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms, and employee lounges.
This is a genuinely dedicated employee-monitoring statute, distinct from the general voyeurism law below, because it applies specifically to employers and lists employee-specific spaces like lounges. Penalties escalate with each violation: $500 for a first offense, $1,000 for a second, and $2,000 for a third or subsequent offense. An employer cannot avoid the statute by having a manager present with a recording device; the prohibition applies regardless of who operates the equipment.
Video and Audio Surveillance in West Virginia Workplaces
Outside the sensitive areas covered by section 21-3-20, West Virginia employers generally have wide latitude to install video cameras in common work areas such as sales floors, warehouses, and lobbies, without a state-mandated notice requirement. The practical limit comes from West Virginia's criminal invasion of privacy statute, W. Va. Code section 61-8-28, which makes it unlawful to knowingly record a person who is nude or partially nude in a place with a reasonable expectation of privacy. That statute reaches private offices or changing areas outside the specific list in section 21-3-20, and a first offense is a misdemeanor while a second is a felony.
Audio recording in the workplace is governed by the same one-party consent rule under W. Va. Code section 62-1D-3: an employer can record through a participating manager, but a hidden microphone capturing conversations no company representative joins violates the wiretapping statute regardless of where it happens. Calls between an employee and a customer are the exception to that framing: section 61-3-24C imposes its own employee-notice and unmonitored-personal-phone conditions on monitoring those calls, whether or not a participant consents. Our West Virginia workplace recording guide covers an employee's own right to record at work and NLRA limits on no-recording policies.
GPS and Vehicle Tracking of West Virginia Employees
West Virginia has not enacted a dedicated employer vehicle-tracking notice statute comparable to New Jersey's N.J. Stat. section 34:6B-22, and it has no standalone criminal statute aimed at placing a tracking device on someone else's vehicle either. The closest applicable law is West Virginia's general stalking statute, W. Va. Code section 61-2-9a, which covers a willful course of conduct, including following, monitoring, or surveilling a specific person, carried out with intent to cause fear or substantial emotional distress.
That statute does not name GPS tracking specifically and has no explicit owner-consent exception the way some other states' tracking laws do. In practice, an employer tracking a vehicle it owns for ordinary business purposes, such as dispatch or asset recovery, does not fit the harassment-intent element, since the conduct is not directed at causing a specific person fear. Tracking an employee's own personal vehicle without consent is a materially different, riskier proposition. See our West Virginia GPS tracking laws guide for the general tracking-device framework.
Biometric Monitoring: Time Clocks in West Virginia
Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act, 740 ILCS 14, is the strongest biometric law nationally, requiring written consent before collection and creating a private right of action, but it does not apply outside Illinois, and West Virginia has no biometric consent statute of its own.
West Virginia also has no comprehensive consumer privacy law that might reach biometric data indirectly. Chapter 46A of the West Virginia Code, the state's consumer protection chapter, runs from Article 1 through Article 8 and contains no consumer data protection article and no provision creating consent rights over biometric or other sensitive personal data.
The practical result for a West Virginia employee is straightforward. No state statute gives you a right to be asked before, or to refuse, a fingerprint or face scan used for a workplace time clock. Employees on a biometric time clock are protected mainly by their employer's own policies, by any collective bargaining agreement, and by common-law privacy claims, not by any dedicated biometric statute. See our West Virginia biometric privacy guide for the wider picture on biometric data in the state.
What West Virginia Employees Can Do About Monitoring Concerns
An employee who believes an employer crossed a legal line has options depending on the facts. A demand for a social media password can support a complaint under W. Va. Code section 21-5H-1. Monitoring of calls with customers that came with no employee notice, or with no unmonitored telephone available for personal calls, can support a complaint under section 61-3-24C. A camera or microphone in a restroom, locker room, or lounge can trigger the escalating criminal misdemeanor fines under section 21-3-20, and if the recording captured someone nude or partially nude, it can also support a criminal report and civil claim under section 61-8-28.
Monitoring tied to a protected characteristic, retaliation for a workers' compensation claim, or interference with NLRA-protected concerted activity may fall under the Human Rights Commission or the National Labor Relations Board instead. Because West Virginia's monitoring rules are split across several distinct sources, keep records (dates, what was monitored, any written policy) and consult a West Virginia-licensed employment attorney rather than assume a single statute covers the situation. For the broader 50-state picture, see our Employee Monitoring Laws by State hub and our general US recording laws guide.
Disclaimer
This article provides general legal information about West Virginia employee monitoring law as of July 9, 2026. It is not a substitute for individualized legal advice. Employment monitoring disputes often involve overlapping statutes, employer policy, and federal law, and outcomes depend on specific facts. Readers should consult an attorney licensed in West Virginia for advice about a particular situation.
Related articles
- Employee Monitoring Laws by State
- West Virginia Recording Laws
- West Virginia Workplace Recording Laws
- West Virginia GPS Tracking Laws
- West Virginia Biometric Privacy Laws
- US Recording Laws by State
Last updated: July 9, 2026. Statutes cited reflect their in-force version as of that date.
More West Virginia Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can my employer read my work email in West Virginia?
Generally yes, once the email is on an employer-owned system. West Virginia has no state notice statute for general electronic monitoring, so employers typically rely on the federal ordinary-course-of-business exception in 18 U.S.C. section 2510(5)(a) to review company email and internet use.
Can my employer ask for my Facebook or Instagram password in West Virginia?
No, not for a personal account. W. Va. Code section 21-5H-1 prohibits requiring or requesting a personal social media username or password, except in narrow misconduct-investigation or legal-compliance circumstances, or where the account is employer-issued.
Does West Virginia law require my employer to tell me I'm being monitored?
Not by a general statute. Unlike Connecticut, Delaware, New York, and Maine, West Virginia has not enacted a general electronic-monitoring notice law covering company email, internet use, or internal calls. Two specific rules do apply: W. Va. Code section 61-3-24C requires an employer that monitors calls between employees and customers to notify each affected employee and to provide unmonitored telephones for personal use, and W. Va. Code section 21-3-20 bans employer surveillance in restrooms, locker rooms, and lounges regardless of notice.
Can my West Virginia employer listen to my calls with customers?
Only on conditions. W. Va. Code section 61-3-24C makes it a misdemeanor to intercept or monitor calls between an employee and a customer unless the employer does both of two things: notifies each affected employee that their telephone messages are subject to monitoring, and provides telephone instruments for personal use that are not monitored. A violation carries a fine of not less than $50 nor more than $200, up to one year in the county jail, or both.
Can my employer put a camera in a West Virginia workplace restroom or locker room?
No. W. Va. Code section 21-3-20 bars any employer from operating electronic surveillance in restrooms, shower rooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms, or employee lounges, with fines of $500, $1,000, and $2,000 for successive violations. The general invasion-of-privacy statute, section 61-8-28, applies as well.
Can my employer GPS track a company vehicle I drive in West Virginia?
Generally yes for a vehicle the employer owns. West Virginia has no dedicated GPS tracking statute, and the general stalking statute, W. Va. Code section 61-2-9a, targets nonconsensual surveillance carried out with intent to harass a specific person, a standard ordinary fleet tracking does not meet.
Can my West Virginia employer require a fingerprint scan for the time clock?
Generally yes. There is no Illinois-style biometric consent statute in West Virginia, and no comprehensive West Virginia consumer privacy law that would supply one, so no state statute gives an employee a right to be asked before or to refuse a workplace fingerprint or face scan. Employees generally rely on employer policy, any union contract, and common-law privacy claims.
Can I record my boss or an HR meeting in West Virginia?
Yes. As a one-party consent state under W. Va. Code section 62-1D-3(e), you can record any conversation you participate in at work without telling anyone else, as long as your purpose is not criminal or tortious. Company no-recording policies may still lead to discipline for a policy violation even though the recording itself is legal.
Updates
Removed an incorrect reference to a West Virginia consumer data protection act that was never enacted, and added W. Va. Code section 61-3-24C, which requires an employer monitoring calls between employees and customers to notify the affected employees and provide unmonitored telephones for personal use.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the W. Va. Code 21-3-20 penalty description from 'civil fines' to the statute's actual criminal misdemeanor fines, and re-anchored the employer 'ordinary course of business' monitoring exception from 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(a)(i) to the correct business-extension exemption at 18 U.S.C. 2510(5)(a).
Corrected a remaining description of W. Va. Code 21-3-20's escalating penalties as civil fines; the statute makes violations criminal misdemeanors.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
West Virginia Code
§ 21-3-20Use of video and other electronic surveillance devices by employers prohibited.In forcecited in 17 of our articles
(a) It is unlawful for any employer or the agent or representative of an employer, whether public or private, to operate any electronic surveillance device or system, including, but not limited to, the use of a closed circuit television system, a video-recording device, or any combination of those or other electronic devices for the purpose of recording or monitoring the activities of the employees in areas designed for the health or personal comfort of the employees or for safeguarding of their possessions, such as rest rooms, shower rooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms and employee lounges. (b) Any employer or agent thereof who violates any provision of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, if convicted, shall be fined $500 for the first offense. An employer or agent thereof convicted a second time under this provision shall be fined $1,000. For the third and any subsequent offense, the penalty shall be $2,000.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Blackwood v. Berry Dunn, LLC (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2019)“…out being in an area protected from monitoring by W. Va. Code § 21-3-20, it cannot be said that taking a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Surveillance Camera Laws by State (2026 Guide), West Virginia Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights, West Virginia Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
§ 21-5H-1Employer access to employee or potential employee personal accounts prohibited.In force
(a) An employer shall not do any of the following: (1) Request, require or coerce an employee or a potential employee to disclose a username and password, password or any other authentication information that allows access to the employee or potential employee's personal account; (2) Request, require or coerce an employee or a potential employee to access the employee or the potential employee’s personal account in the presence of the employer; or (3) Compel an employee or potential employee to add the employer or an employment agency to their list of contacts that enable the contacts to access a personal account.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Durstein v. Alexander (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2022)“…ce of the employer. Pl’s Resp. at 8-9, ECF No. 224 (citing W. Va. Code Ann. § 21-5H-1(a)).15 But the two are not truly discre…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 62-1D-3Interception of communications generally.In forcecited in 36 of our articles
(a) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this article it is unlawful for any person to: (1) Intentionally intercept, attempt to intercept or procure any other person to intercept or attempt to intercept, any wire, oral or electronic communication; or (2) Intentionally disclose or intentionally attempt to disclose to any other person the contents of any wire, oral or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication in violation of this article; and (3) Intentionally use or disclose or intentionally attempt to use or disclose the contents of any wire, oral or electronic communication or the identity of any party thereto, knowing or having reason to know that such information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication in violation of this article. (b) Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in the penitentiary for not more than five years or fined not more than $10,000 or both fined and imprisoned.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1999
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bartnicki v. Vopper (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1999, 200 F.3d 109)“…77 -23a-4, 77-23a-11; Va. Code Ann. §§ 19.2-62 , 19.2-69; W. Va.Code §§ 62-1D-3, 62-1D-12; Wis. Stat. § 968.31 ; Wyo.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: West Virginia Smart Glasses Recording Laws, West Virginia Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Guide, West Virginia Phone Call Recording Laws: Rules and Consent Guide
§ 61-8-28Criminal invasion of privacy; penalties.In forcecited in 27 of our articles
(a) For the purposes of this section, the words or terms defined in this subsection have the meanings ascribed to them. These definitions are applicable unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context: (1) “A person fully or partially nude” means a male or female who is either clothed or unclothed so that: (A) All or any part of his or her genitals, pubic area or buttocks is visible; or (B) in the case of a female only, a part of a nipple of her breast is visible and is without a fully opaque covering; (2) “To visually portray” a person means to create a reproducible image of that person by means of: (A) A photograph; (B) A motion picture; (C) A video tape; (D) A digital recording; or (E) Any other mechanical or electronic recording process or device that can preserve, for later viewing, a visual image of a person; and (3) “Place where a reasonable person would have an expectation of privacy” means a place where a reasonable person would believe that he or she could, in privacy, be fully or partially nude without expecting that the act of exposing his or her body was being visually portrayed by another person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Imaginary Images, Inc. v. Evans (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2010, 612 F.3d 736)“…8 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7507.1(e); Utah Code Ann. § 76-5a-2(6); W. Va. Code § 61-8-28(a)(1); Wis. Stat. § 942.08(1)(a). The m…”
- United States v. Thoms (U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 2014)“…9-702.7 (West 2013); Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 13, § 2605 (2010); W. Va. Code § 61-8-28 (2000). 4 Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: West Virginia Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026, West Virginia Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 61-2-9AStalking, harassment; penalties; definitions.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) Stalking. — Any person who engages in a course of conduct directed at another person with the intent to cause the other person to fear for his or her personal safety, the safety of others, or suffer substantial emotional distress, or causes a third person to so act, is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $1,000, confined in jail for not more than six months, or both fined and confined. (b) Harassment. — Any person who harasses, or repeatedly makes credible threats against another is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be confined in jail for not more than six months, or fined not more than $1,000, or both fined and confined.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Also relied on in: West Virginia GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), West Virginia Expungement Laws: W. Va. Code § 61-11-26 Explained
United States Code Title 18
§ 2510DefinitionsIn forcecited in 126 of our articles
As used in this chapter— “wire communication” means any aural transfer made in whole or in part through the use of facilities for the transmission of communications by the aid of wire, cable, or other like connection between the point of origin and the point of reception (including the use of such connection in a switching station) furnished or operated by any person engaged in providing or operating such facilities for the transmission of interstate or foreign communications or communications affecting interstate or foreign commerce; “oral communication” means any oral communication uttered by a person exhibiting an expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation, but such term does not include any electronic communication; “State” means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the United States; “intercept” means the aural or other acquisition of the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication through the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device.1 So in original. The period probably should be a semicolon.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,382 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States v. New York Telephone Co. (1977) held that pen registers fall outside Title III because they do not acquire the contents of a communication as Section 2510(4) and (8) define interception. Forsyth v. Barr (1994) applied the same definitions, treating the defendant officers as law enforcement officers under Section 2510(7).
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Forsyth v. Barr (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1994, 19 F.3d 1527)✓Neighbors tapped an informant's home line and the overheard charges reached Dallas internal affairs; the Fifth Circuit saw no evidence the police defendants intercepted anything and held they were 2510(7) law enforcement officers, so 2517(1) and (2) allowed their use of it.
- Nixon v. Administrator of General Services (Supreme Court of the United States 1977, 433 U.S. 425)“…of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U. S. C. §§ 2510 et seq. 408 F. Supp., at 363 . We…”
- Gannett Co. v. DePasquale (Supreme Court of the United States 1979, 443 U.S. 368)“…of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U. S. C. § 2510 et seq., be preserved prior to the d…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: US Recording Laws by State (2026): All 50 States Explained, Georgia Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Audio, All-Party Video, District of Columbia Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
§ 2511Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibitedIn forcecited in 422 of our articles
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who— intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when— such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication; or such device transmits communications by radio, or interferes with the transmission of such communication; or such person knows, or has reason to know, that such device or any component thereof has been sent through the mail or transported in interstate or foreign commerce; or such use or endeavor to use (A) takes place on the premises of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or (B) obtains or is for the purpose of obtaining information relating to the operations of any business or other commercial establishment the operations of which affect interstate or foreign…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,045 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Griggs-Ryan v. Smith (1990) applied the Section 2511(2)(d) prior-consent exception, treating a tenant repeatedly told that all incoming calls were taped as having impliedly consented. United States v. United States District Court (1972) read the then-current Section 2511(3) as conferring no presidential surveillance power.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mitchell v. Forsyth (Supreme Court of the United States 1985, 472 U.S. 511)✓The Attorney General authorized a warrantless 1970 national security wiretap that caught the plaintiff's calls; the Court held the since-repealed Section 2511(3) disclaimer left the tap lawful under Title III, and that Mitchell had qualified immunity.
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 407 U.S. 297)✓The Attorney General approved warrantless wiretaps on members of a domestic group accused of bombing a CIA office; the Court read Section 2511(3) as a congressional disclaimer conferring no surveillance power, then held the Fourth Amendment required prior judicial approval.
- Forsyth v. Barr (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1994, 19 F.3d 1527)✓Dallas police used, in an internal affairs probe of an officer, calls private parties allegedly intercepted illegally; assuming that was unlawful, the Fifth Circuit held Section 2517(1) and (2) allowed the disclosure and use, defeating the Section 2511(1)(c) and (d) claims.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Connecticut Recording Laws (2026): Hybrid Consent Rules Explained, Oregon Recording Laws (2026): Hybrid One-Party and All-Party Rules, Hawaii Recording Laws (2026): Hybrid Consent State Rules
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- W. Va. Code § 21-5H-1, Employer access to employee or potential employee personal accounts prohibited(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code § 21-3-20, Employer limitations on electronic surveillance in employee restrooms, locker rooms, and lounges(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code § 62-1D-3, Interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications (one-party consent at subsection (e))(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code § 61-8-28, Criminal invasion of privacy(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code § 61-2-9a, Stalking; harassment; penalties; definitions(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. section 2510(5)(a), business-extension exemption for employer-furnished equipment used in the ordinary course of business(law.cornell.edu).gov
- Watkins v. L.M. Berry & Co., 704 F.2d 577 (11th Cir. 1983)(law.resource.org)
- West Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act, W. Va. Code § 46A-6O-2 (definitions, consumer excludes employment context) and Article 46A-6O generally, effective Jan. 1, 2026(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. § 2511 – Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited(uscode.house.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code § 61-3-24C, Intercepting or monitoring customer telephone calls; penalty (employee notice plus unmonitored personal-use telephone required)(code.wvlegislature.gov)
- West Virginia Code Chapter 46A, Consumer Protection (article index: Articles 1 through 8, no consumer data protection article)(code.wvlegislature.gov)