West Virginia
West Virginia GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited June 17, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. How we verify our legal content
Search for "West Virginia GPS tracking law" and you will run into confident blog posts citing statutes that do not say what the bloggers think they say. So let us start with the truth: West Virginia has no statute written specifically for GPS trackers.
That does not make secret tracking legal. The Legislature rewrote the state's stalking and harassment law, W. Va. Code 61-2-9a, in 2020 and again in 2023, and the current language is broad enough to reach GPS devices, AirTags, and phone tracking apps. Hide a tracker on a car you do not own, and that statute is what a prosecutor will reach for.
This guide explains how the law actually works, debunks the most repeated myth about West Virginia tracking law, and walks through your options if you find a device on your own vehicle.
Is It Legal to Put a GPS Tracker on a Car in West Virginia?
It depends on whose car it is. Tracking a vehicle you own, or a vehicle whose owner has given you permission, is generally legal in West Virginia. No statute forbids it.
Tracking a car that belongs to someone else, without their knowledge, is a different story. Prosecutors can charge secret tracking as stalking or harassment under W. Va. Code 61-2-9a, because the statute reaches anyone who monitors or surveils a person "by any action, method, device, or means."
There is also a federal layer. In United States v. Jones (2012), the U.S. Supreme Court held that when police attach a GPS device to a car, that is a Fourth Amendment search, which generally requires a warrant. And 18 U.S.C. 2261A, the federal stalking statute, covers using an electronic device to monitor or track a person in ways that cause fear or substantial emotional distress.
The bottom line: your car, your tracker, no problem. Someone else's car, no consent, real criminal exposure.
WV's Stalking Law Covers Monitoring and Surveilling (W. Va. Code 61-2-9a)
West Virginia's stalking and harassment statute was substantially rewritten in 2020 and amended again in 2023. The current version is deliberately technology neutral, and that is what makes it the state's de facto GPS law.
The statute builds its offenses on a "course of conduct," defined as a pattern of two or more acts in which a person "directly, indirectly, or through a third party, by any action, method, device, or means, follows, monitors, observes, surveils, or threatens" another person.
Read that definition slowly, because a hidden GPS tracker checks nearly every box. A tracker is a "device." Watching someone's location through it is monitoring, observing, and surveilling. And the "indirectly, or through a third party" language means you cannot dodge the statute by having a friend plant the device or by only ever watching the data through an app.
Because the statute requires a pattern of two or more acts, a single isolated act may not complete the offense by itself. But tracking is rarely a single act. Placing the device, then checking the location feed, then showing up where the person happens to be builds exactly the kind of pattern the statute describes.
The 61-3-50 Myth: That's a Music Piracy Law, Not a GPS Law
Several GPS blogs and state-by-state roundups cite W. Va. Code 61-3-50 as West Virginia's vehicle tracking statute. It is not. Read the actual text on the Legislature's website and you will find a law about the unauthorized transfer of recorded sounds. It targets people who copy and sell recordings without the owner's consent. It is a record piracy law from the era of bootleg tapes.
![]()
It says nothing about GPS, vehicles, location data, or tracking devices. If a website tells you that 61-3-50 makes GPS tracking a crime in West Virginia, that website has not read the statute. The real action is in 61-2-9a.
Who Can Legally Track a Vehicle in West Virginia
Several categories of tracking remain clearly lawful:
- Vehicle owners and co-owners. If the car is titled in your name, you can put a tracker on it.
- Parents and legal guardians. Tracking a vehicle your minor child drives, especially one you own and insure, is lawful parenting, not stalking.
- Employers, on company-owned vehicles. More on this below.
- Lenders and lessors. GPS units installed under the terms of a financing or lease contract you signed.
- Police, with a warrant. United States v. Jones makes warrantless GPS attachment a Fourth Amendment problem.
- Anyone with the owner's consent.
One caution on the co-owner rule: ownership is a strong defense, but it is not a magic shield. If a protective order or personal safety order tells you to stay away from someone, using a jointly owned car's tracker to follow them invites a charge under 61-2-9a, and the order itself raises the stakes. If you have been served with an order for injunctive relief under W. Va. Code 48-5-608 or 48-27-501, or with a personal safety order under 53-8-7, that conduct is a felony carrying 1 to 5 years in prison even on a first offense.
Can My Employer Track My Car in West Virginia?
West Virginia has no statute that limits employer GPS tracking. The only workplace surveillance law on the books, W. Va. Code 21-3-20, bans employers from operating electronic surveillance devices in restrooms, locker rooms, and similar areas. It says nothing about vehicles or location data.
That means tracking on company-owned vehicles is essentially unregulated in West Virginia. If you drive a company truck or van, assume it is tracked.
Your personal vehicle is different. An employer who hides a tracker on an employee's personal car without consent has no statutory safe harbor and faces the same stalking-law and civil privacy exposure as anyone else. Most employers that track personal vehicles used for work get written consent through a policy or handbook. If cameras at work are your concern instead, see our guide to surveillance camera laws.
AirTags and Item Trackers
Everything above applies to Apple AirTags, Tiles, and Samsung SmartTags. The "any action, method, device, or means" phrasing in 61-2-9a is technology neutral by design, so it does not matter whether the device is a $25 coin-sized tag or a hardwired fleet tracker.
![]()
Dropping an AirTag into someone's bag or sticking one under their bumper to follow their movements is monitoring and surveilling by a device, and repeated use builds the course of conduct the statute requires.
Both Apple and Android phones now push alerts when an unknown tracker is traveling with you. Those alerts are how many people first discover they are being tracked, and they make useful evidence. Screenshot them.
Penalties for Illegal GPS Tracking in West Virginia
Here is how the penalties under W. Va. Code 61-2-9a stack up:
| Offense | Level | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| First offense | Misdemeanor | Up to 6 months in jail and a fine up to $1,000 |
| Offense committed while a domestic violence or family court protective order under 48-5-501, 48-5-601, or 48-27-403 is in effect | Misdemeanor | 90 days to 1 year in jail and a $2,000 to $5,000 fine |
| Offense against a person protected by a served order for injunctive relief under 48-5-608 or 48-27-501, or by a personal safety order under 53-8-7 | Felony | 1 to 5 years in prison and a $3,000 to $10,000 fine |
| Second or subsequent offense | Felony | 1 to 5 years in prison and a $3,000 to $10,000 fine |
| Conduct intended to cause the victim to self-harm | Felony | 2 to 10 years in prison |
Note the split between the two protective-order rows, because it is the detail most write-ups get wrong. A violation is only a misdemeanor under subsection (c) when the order came from the family or magistrate court provisions listed there. Subsections (e) and (f) make the same conduct a felony when the victim is protected by a served order for injunctive relief under 48-5-608 or 48-27-501, or by a chapter 53, article 8 personal safety order. That felony tier applies on a first offense, and the personal safety order is exactly the order this guide recommends to stalking victims who have no domestic relationship with the person tracking them.
Federal charges under 18 U.S.C. 2261A are also possible when tracking crosses state lines or uses interstate electronic systems, and federal penalties can run higher than the state ranges.
Civil Options and Personal Safety Orders
Criminal charges are not the only remedy.
West Virginia has no statute creating a specific civil claim for GPS tracking. But West Virginia courts recognize the privacy tort of intrusion upon seclusion, adopted by the Supreme Court of Appeals in Crump v. Beckley Newspapers (1983). Secretly monitoring someone's movements is the kind of intrusion that tort was built for, and a victim can sue for damages.
Victims can also seek court orders. If the person tracking you is a family or household member, you can pursue a domestic violence protective order; see our guide to West Virginia restraining order laws. If there is no domestic relationship, West Virginia Code chapter 53, article 8 lets stalking victims petition magistrate court for a personal safety order, which can require the person to stay away and stop all contact. That order has teeth: once it has been served, stalking or harassing the protected person is a felony under W. Va. Code 61-2-9a(f), punishable by 1 to 5 years in prison and a $3,000 to $10,000 fine.
What to Do If You Find a Tracker on Your Car
- Do not destroy it. The device is evidence, and it may carry fingerprints or a registered owner.
- Photograph it in place before touching anything. Wheel well, bumper, OBD port, wherever it sits.
- Call your local police or sheriff. Ask them to document the device and explain that hidden tracking can support charges under W. Va. Code 61-2-9a.
- Save every alert. Unknown-tracker notifications from your phone help prove the pattern.
- Think before removing it if you suspect an abuser. Removal tells the person you found it. A domestic violence advocate can help you plan safely first.
- Consider a protective order or personal safety order, depending on your relationship to the person.
![]()
Worried about hidden microphones or cameras too? West Virginia is a one-party consent state for audio. See our West Virginia recording laws guide.
For rules in other states, see our full guide to GPS Tracking Laws by State.
Sources
- W. Va. Code § 61-2-9a, Stalking and harassment, West Virginia Legislature
- W. Va. Code § 61-3-50, Unauthorized transfer of recorded sounds, West Virginia Legislature
- W. Va. Code § 21-3-20, Employer limitations on electronic surveillance, West Virginia Legislature
- W. Va. Code § 53-8-4, Petition for personal safety order, West Virginia Legislature
- W. Va. Code § 53-8-7, Personal safety hearing; forms of relief, West Virginia Legislature
- 18 U.S.C. § 2261A, Stalking, Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
Disclaimer: This article is general legal information, not legal advice. Statutes change and individual facts matter. If you are dealing with tracking or stalking in West Virginia, talk to a West Virginia attorney or a domestic violence advocate. If you are in immediate danger, call 911.
More West Virginia Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal to put a GPS tracker on someone's car in West Virginia?
There is no statute aimed specifically at GPS devices, but secret tracking is prosecuted under W. Va. Code 61-2-9a, the stalking and harassment law. It covers anyone who monitors or surveils a person by any action, method, device, or means, and a pattern of two or more acts is enough to charge.
Can I put a tracker on my spouse's car in West Virginia?
If the car is titled in your name or jointly titled, tracking it is generally lawful as an owner. But if you are separated, subject to a protective order, or tracking a car titled only in your spouse's name, the conduct can be charged as stalking under 61-2-9a. If you have been served with an order for injunctive relief under W. Va. Code 48-5-608 or 48-27-501, that charge is a felony carrying 1 to 5 years in prison.
Are AirTags illegal in West Virginia?
Owning and using an AirTag to find your own keys, luggage, or vehicle is legal. Using one to follow another person without their consent fits the monitor-and-surveil language of W. Va. Code 61-2-9a and can be charged the same way as any other hidden tracker.
Can police track my car without a warrant in West Virginia?
Generally no. In United States v. Jones (2012), the U.S. Supreme Court held that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle is a Fourth Amendment search, so police normally need a warrant before installing a tracker.
Can my employer put a GPS tracker on my personal car?
Not without your consent. West Virginia's only workplace surveillance statute, W. Va. Code 21-3-20, covers restrooms and locker rooms, not vehicles, so there is no special employer permission to track. Company-owned vehicles are a different matter and are routinely tracked.
Can a private investigator legally place a GPS tracker in West Virginia?
West Virginia's stalking law contains no exemption for private investigators. A PI who hides a tracker on a car without the vehicle owner's consent runs the same legal risk as anyone else. The safe route is tracking only with the owner's written permission.
How do I stop someone from tracking me in West Virginia?
Document everything, report it to police, and seek a court order. Family or household members can be restrained through a domestic violence protective order, and chapter 53, article 8 of the West Virginia Code lets stalking victims ask magistrate court for a personal safety order even when there is no domestic relationship.
Updates
Corrected the penalties table: stalking or harassment against a person protected by a served order under W. Va. Code 48-5-608, 48-27-501, or 53-8-7 (including a personal safety order) is a felony carrying 1 to 5 years in prison, not the misdemeanor the table previously showed for all protective orders.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Removed an invented five-year window on West Virginia's recidivist stalking/harassment felony -- W. Va. Code 61-2-9A(d) applies to any second or subsequent conviction, with no time limit.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
West Virginia Code
§ 61-2-9AStalking, harassment; penalties; definitions.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) Stalking. — Any person who engages in a course of conduct directed at another person with the intent to cause the other person to fear for his or her personal safety, the safety of others, or suffer substantial emotional distress, or causes a third person to so act, is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $1,000, confined in jail for not more than six months, or both fined and confined. (b) Harassment. — Any person who harasses, or repeatedly makes credible threats against another is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be confined in jail for not more than six months, or fined not more than $1,000, or both fined and confined.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Also relied on in: West Virginia Expungement Laws: W. Va. Code § 61-11-26 Explained, West Virginia Employee Monitoring Laws: Workplace Surveillance and Social Media (2026)
§ 21-3-20Use of video and other electronic surveillance devices by employers prohibited.In forcecited in 17 of our articles
(a) It is unlawful for any employer or the agent or representative of an employer, whether public or private, to operate any electronic surveillance device or system, including, but not limited to, the use of a closed circuit television system, a video-recording device, or any combination of those or other electronic devices for the purpose of recording or monitoring the activities of the employees in areas designed for the health or personal comfort of the employees or for safeguarding of their possessions, such as rest rooms, shower rooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms and employee lounges. (b) Any employer or agent thereof who violates any provision of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, if convicted, shall be fined $500 for the first offense. An employer or agent thereof convicted a second time under this provision shall be fined $1,000. For the third and any subsequent offense, the penalty shall be $2,000.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2019
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Blackwood v. Berry Dunn, LLC (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2019)“…out being in an area protected from monitoring by W. Va. Code § 21-3-20, it cannot be said that taking a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Surveillance Camera Laws by State (2026 Guide), West Virginia Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights, West Virginia Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
§ 53-8-4Petition seeking relief.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) Underlying acts. – A petitioner may seek relief under this article by filing with a magistrate court a petition that alleges the commission of any of the following acts against the petitioner by the respondent: (1) A sexual offense or attempted sexual offense as defined in section one of this article; (2) A violation of subsection (a), section nine-a, article two, chapter sixty-one of this code; or (3) repeated credible threats of bodily injury when the person making the threats knows or has reason to know that the threats cause another person to reasonably fear for his or her safety. (b) Contents.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Also relied on in: West Virginia Restraining Order Laws (2026): How to Get a Protective Order
United States Code Title 18
§ 2261AStalkingIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
Whoever— travels in interstate or foreign commerce or is present within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or enters or leaves Indian country, with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel or presence engages in conduct that— places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to— that person; an immediate family member (as defined in section 115) of that person; a spouse or intimate partner of that person; or the pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse of that person; or causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to a person described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of subparagraph (A); or with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, uses the mail, any interactive computer service or electronic communication service or electronic communication system of interstate commerce, or any other…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 350 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Federal appeals courts have construed and upheld Section 2261A. United States v. Walker (2011) read in the course of, or as a result of such travel disjunctively, so pre-travel threats plus resulting fear sufficed. United States v. Amy Gonzalez (2018) held it neither overbroad nor vague and no First Amendment violation as applied.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Walker (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 2011, 665 F.3d 212)✓After emailing threats to his estranged wife, the defendant flew from Michigan to Puerto Rico and was arrested on arrival. The court read the disjunctive phrase in 2261A(1) to cover travel that itself places the target in reasonable fear, and upheld the stalking conviction.
- United States v. Amy Gonzalez (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2018, 905 F.3d 165)✓Relatives waged a years-long campaign against a mother that ended in a courthouse shooting. The court held 2261A is neither overbroad nor vague because it reaches harassing conduct, and that the mental states it lists are alternative means, not elements; convictions affirmed.
- United States v. Wills (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2003, 346 F.3d 476)✓A burglary suspect pursued the witness who identified him at a preliminary hearing; the witness later died. The court held the evidence met each element of 2261A: travel from D.C. to Virginia, intent to harm or harass, and reasonable fear of death; conviction affirmed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Colorado GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Florida GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- W. Va. Code 61-2-9a, Stalking and harassment(code.wvlegislature.gov)
- W. Va. Code 61-3-50, Unauthorized transfer of recorded sounds(code.wvlegislature.gov)
- W. Va. Code 21-3-20, Employer limitations on electronic surveillance(code.wvlegislature.gov)
- W. Va. Code 53-8-4, Petition for personal safety order(code.wvlegislature.gov)
- 18 U.S.C. 2261A, Stalking(law.cornell.edu)
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012)(law.cornell.edu)
- W. Va. Code 53-8-7, Personal safety hearing; forms of relief(code.wvlegislature.gov)