Delaware
Delaware Drone Laws (2026): Privacy & Penalties
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Delaware's main drone statute bars flying over large events, critical infrastructure, or active emergency scenes, and bars using a drone to harass or invade someone's privacy on private property, but it exempts law enforcement entirely. A separate law makes drone-delivered prison contraband a felony.
Information last verified on 2026-07-09. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
Scope: This page covers Delaware state law on private drone use: the Section 1334 conduct restrictions, general privacy and voyeurism statutes as applied to drones, the prison-contraband felony, and local preemption. It does not cover FAA flight rules such as registration, Part 107 certification, or Remote ID. See our Drone Laws by State hub for how Delaware compares to states with a dedicated civilian drone-privacy statute.
What does Delaware's main drone statute actually prohibit?
Delaware's primary drone law, 11 Del. C. Section 1334, makes it unlawful to knowingly operate, direct, or program an unmanned aircraft system to fly over a sporting event, concert, automobile race, festival, or other event with more than 1,500 people in attendance; over critical infrastructure; or over an incident where first responders are actively engaged. The same section separately prohibits using a drone in a manner that subjects a person on private property to harassment, that invades a person's privacy on private property, or that violates a protective order.
The statute exempts several categories of use. A drone flying over property with the written permission of the owner or occupier is exempt, as is a drone operated by a college or university for educational purposes in FAA compliance, and a drone used for a commercial or other purpose by an operator authorized under FAA rules. A first violation is an unclassified misdemeanor, a second is a Class B misdemeanor, and any violation resulting in physical injury or property damage is a Class A misdemeanor.

Does Delaware law apply to law enforcement drone use?
Not through Section 1334. The statute exempts an unmanned aircraft system used for law-enforcement purposes from all of its prohibitions, including the harassment and privacy-invasion provisions that apply to everyone else. That makes Delaware's approach the opposite of the roughly dozen states that have passed a statute specifically requiring police to obtain a warrant before flying a drone; Delaware has no comparable requirement in its drone code.
That does not mean Delaware police operate free of any legal constraint. Ordinary Fourth Amendment search-and-seizure doctrine still applies to a police drone flight the same way it applies to any other government search, and a Delaware law-enforcement agency flying a drone for a government purpose must still comply with FAA Part 107 rules or hold a federal Certificate of Authorization. But a Delaware resident cannot point to a state statute the way a Florida, Illinois, or Minnesota resident can. See our Surveillance Camera Laws by State hub for how Delaware treats fixed camera surveillance by comparison.
Do Delaware's general privacy and voyeurism laws reach drone cameras?
Yes. Delaware has no civilian drone-privacy statute layered on top of Section 1334, but its general privacy offense was written broadly enough to reach any recording device, drones included. 11 Del. C. Section 1335, Violation of Privacy, criminalizes a list of acts: installing or using, without consent, a device to observe, photograph, record, or broadcast events or sounds in a private place; recording someone getting dressed or undressed, or exposing intimate body parts, without consent in a place where they would normally disrobe; and installing a GPS tracking device on someone's vehicle without consent, among others. Grading turns on which paragraph is violated. Section 1335(c) makes the private-place surveillance and GPS-tracking provisions a Class A misdemeanor, but it makes two of the camera provisions Class G felonies outright, with no aggravating factor required: recording a person who is dressing, undressing, or has intimate body parts exposed where people normally disrobe, and secretly recording under or through a person's clothing. That grading matters directly for drones, because Section 1334's privacy prohibition incorporates the disrobing provision by reference. Base dissemination of a prohibited visual depiction, including a deepfake, is the Class A misdemeanor that rises to a Class G felony when an aggravating factor applies, such as obtaining the depiction through theft or unauthorized computer access, disseminating it for profit, operating a website or app for that purpose, disseminating it with intent to harass, or pairing it with the depicted person's personally identifiable information.
Because these statutes turn on the conduct and the victim's reasonable expectation of privacy rather than on the type of camera used, a drone hovering at a window or over a fenced yard to capture that kind of image can trigger the same liability as a hidden camera or a peeping-Tom scenario. Delaware residents concerned about a neighbor's drone should look to these general statutes rather than expecting a drone-specific privacy law, since Delaware has not enacted one.
What is Delaware's prison-drone-contraband law?
House Bill 30, signed by Governor John Carney in August 2019 at the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, amended Title 11 to make it a Class F felony to deliver or attempt to deliver contraband into any Delaware detention facility using a drone. The penalty reaches up to three years at Level V incarceration under 11 Del. C. Section 4205(b)(6), among the more severe drone-specific penalties in Delaware law. The fine is a separate question, and the widely repeated $500,000 figure does not apply to an individual defendant. Section 1256 specifies no fine at all, and Section 4205(k) simply allows the sentencing court to add such fines and penalties as it deems appropriate. The $500,000 ceiling comes from Section 4208, which is titled Fines for organizations and caps what an organization, not a person, can be fined for a felony that does not cause death or serious physical injury.
The law followed a documented pattern of drone incidents at James T. Vaughn, Delaware's largest prison, which went on lockdown after drone sightings on multiple occasions in 2018, including three consecutive nights in one stretch, with contraband discovered inside afterward. The legislation arrived roughly two years after Correctional Officer Lieutenant Steven Floyd was killed during a February 2017 inmate uprising and hostage situation at the same facility, an event that had already sharpened statewide attention on prison security before the drone incidents began.
Can a Delaware county or city pass its own drone ordinance?
No. Delaware law reserves drone regulation to the state itself: only the State may enact a law or take other action to prohibit, restrict, or regulate the testing or operation of unmanned aircraft systems, and this expressly preempts any county or municipal ordinance on the subject. A Delaware resident who wants a stricter local drone rule, such as a town-specific no-fly zone over a park, has no local government avenue to get one, because Section 1334 itself forecloses that option statewide.
Can I shoot down a drone flying over my property in Delaware?
No. Federal law makes it a serious felony to willfully damage, destroy, or disable any aircraft, and the FAA has classified drones as aircraft within the National Airspace System since 2012. Under 18 U.S.C. Section 32, a conviction carries up to twenty years in federal prison and a $250,000 fine, and it applies even over the shooter's own property, because the FAA, not the landowner, controls the airspace.
Publicized cases in which a shooter faced only reduced or dismissed state charges are not evidence of a legal right to shoot down a drone; they reflect prosecutorial and judicial discretion in individual cases, not a rule of law, and no state, including Delaware, has passed a statute authorizing a landowner to disable a drone over their own property. Self-help against a drone remains legally risky in Delaware as everywhere else.
Disclaimer
This article provides general legal information about Delaware drone law as verified on 2026-07-09. It does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Readers with a specific drone-related dispute or law-enforcement encounter should consult a lawyer licensed in Delaware.
Related articles
- Drone Laws by State: the complete hub
- Surveillance Camera Laws by State
- Is It Illegal to Record Someone in Public?
Last updated: 2026-07-09. Statutes cited reflect their in-force version as of 2026-07-09.
More Delaware Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal to fly a drone over my neighbor's property in Delaware?
Simply flying over private property is not automatically illegal under Delaware's Section 1334, but using the drone to harass someone on that property, invade their privacy, or violate a protective order is prohibited. Written permission from the property owner is also a defense the statute recognizes.
Does Delaware police need a warrant to fly a drone over my property?
Delaware has no statute requiring a warrant for police drone use. Section 1334 exempts law-enforcement operation from its restrictions entirely, so a police drone flight is governed by ordinary Fourth Amendment doctrine rather than a state statutory warrant requirement.
What happens if a drone drops contraband into a Delaware prison?
Under House Bill 30 (2019), delivering or attempting to deliver contraband into a Delaware detention facility by drone is a Class F felony, punishable by up to 3 years at Level V. Delaware sets no dollar cap on an individual felon's fine: 11 Del. C. Section 4205(k) lets the sentencing court impose whatever fine it deems appropriate. The $500,000 figure commonly attached to this offense comes from Section 4208, which caps fines for organizations, not individuals.
Can I record my neighbor with a drone in Delaware if they're outside?
It depends on whether they have a reasonable expectation of privacy in that moment and location. Delaware's general privacy statute, 11 Del. C. Section 1335, applies to any recording device, including a drone, used without consent to observe or record someone in circumstances where privacy is reasonably expected.
Can a Delaware town ban drones from flying over its parks?
No. Delaware law reserves all authority to regulate the testing or operation of unmanned aircraft systems to the state itself and preempts county and municipal ordinances on the subject.
Is it legal to shoot down a drone over my property in Delaware?
No. Shooting down any drone is a federal felony under 18 U.S.C. Section 32 regardless of where it is flying or who owns the land beneath it. No state, including Delaware, has authorized landowners to disable drones over their property.
Updates
Corrected the penalty for drone-delivered prison contraband: Delaware sets no $500,000 fine for an individual (that cap applies to organizations), and clarified that Delaware's privacy statute grades recording someone disrobing as a felony, not a misdemeanor.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the description of 11 Del. C. Section 1335's felony elevation: disseminating a deepfake is a Class G felony only when a listed aggravating factor (theft/hacking, for-profit, website operation, intent to harass, or PII pairing) applies, not automatically.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Delaware Code, Title 11 (Crimes and Criminal Procedure), Chapter 005 (SPECIFIC OFFENSES)
§ 1334Unlawful use of an unmanned aircraft system; unclassified misdemeanor; class B misdemeanor; class A misdemeanor.In force
(a) Definitions. — The following terms shall have the following meanings as used in this section. (1) “Critical infrastructure” means petroleum refineries, petroleum storage facilities, chemical storage facilities, chemical manufacturing facilities, fuel storage facilities, electric substations, power plants, electric generation facilities, military facilities, commercial port and harbor facilities, rail yard facilities, drinking water treatment or storage facilities, correctional facilities, government buildings, and public safety buildings or facilities. (2) “First responder” means federal, state, and local law-enforcement officers, fire, and emergency medical services personnel, hazardous materials response team members, 911 dispatchers, or any individual who is responsible for the protection and preservation of life and is directed to respond to an incident that could result in death or serious injury. (3) “Unmanned aircraft system” means a powered, aerial vehicle that: a. Does not carry a human operator; b. Uses aerodynamic forces to provide vehicle lift; c. Can fly autonomously or be piloted remotely; and d. Can be expendable or recoverable. (b) Prohibited acts.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Stonebridge Townhomes Owners' Association v. Mark T. Ptomey (Court of Chancery of Delaware 2026)“…s submission resolves any concerns and PX2 is admitted. Cf. 11 Del. C. § 1334 (criminalizing, at the state level, cer…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 1335Violation of privacy; class A misdemeanor; class G felony.In forcecited in 19 of our articles
(a) A person is guilty of violation of privacy when, except as authorized by law, the person: (1) Trespasses on property intending to subject anyone to eavesdropping or other surveillance in a private place; or (2) Installs in any private place, without consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy there, any device for observing, photographing, recording, amplifying or broadcasting sounds or events in that place; or (3) Installs or uses outside a private place any device for hearing, recording, amplifying or broadcasting sounds originating in that place which would not ordinarily be audible or comprehensible outside, without the consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy there; or (4) Intercepts without the consent of all parties thereto a message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of communicating privately, including private conversation; or (5) Divulges without the consent of the sender and the receiver the existence or contents of any message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of communicating privately if the accused knows that the message was unlawfully intercepted or if the accused learned of the message in the course of…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at delcode.delaware.gov
Cited in 15 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):State v. Pulgini (1976) held 11 Del. C. 1335 does not reach police acts covered by sections 1336 and 1431, so a police interception made with one party's consent was lawful. State of Delaware v. Steven Wu (2026) construed 1335(a)(9)(b) as protecting confidentiality from third parties regardless of whether the relationship has ended.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Pulgini (Superior Court of Delaware 1976, 366 A.2d 1198)✓Police recorded a call between the defendant and an informant with the informant's consent but no court order. The court held section 1335 does not apply to police acts covered by sections 1336 and 1431, and one-party consent made the interception lawful.
- State of Delaware v. Steven Wu (Delaware Court of Common Pleas 2026)✓Charged after leaving printed intimate photos from a past affair in the woman's shared mailbox, a man sought a pretrial ruling on section 1335(a)(9)(b). On uncontested facts, the court read beyond that relationship as disclosure outside the private relationship, ended or not.
- Duffy v. State (Supreme Court of Delaware 2019)“…er 2017, Duffy was indicted for Violation of Privacy under 11 Del. C. § 1335(a)(7). The charges arose from Duffy tak…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Delaware GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Delaware Video Recording Laws: Consent Rules, Surveillance, and Penalties (2026), Delaware Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Privacy Protections (2026)
United States Code Title 18
§ 32Destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilitiesIn forcecited in 51 of our articles
Whoever willfully— sets fire to, damages, destroys, disables, or wrecks any aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States or any civil aircraft used, operated, or employed in interstate, overseas, or foreign air commerce; places or causes to be placed a destructive device or substance in, upon, or in proximity to, or otherwise makes or causes to be made unworkable or unusable or hazardous to work or use, any such aircraft, or any part or other materials used or intended to be used in connection with the operation of such aircraft, if such placing or causing to be placed or such making or causing to be made is likely to endanger the safety of any such aircraft; sets fire to, damages, destroys, or disables any air navigation facility, or interferes by force or violence with the operation of such facility, if such fire, damaging, destroying, disabling, or interfering is likely to endanger the safety of any such aircraft in flight; with the intent to damage, destroy, or disable any such aircraft, sets fire to, damages, destroys, or disables or places a destructive device or substance in, upon, or in proximity to, any appliance or structure, ramp, landing area,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 168 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States v. Yousef (2003) applied 18 U.S.C. 32 to an overseas airline bombing plot, holding Section 32(a) reaches conduct abroad because US-flag aircraft in flight are within the special aircraft jurisdiction, and that a defendant brought here involuntarily is still found in the United States under Section 32(b).
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Perez v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1971, 402 U.S. 146)“…commerce, as, for example, the destruction of an aircraft ( 18 U. S. C. § 32 ), or persons or things in commerce, as…”
- Stanford v. Kentucky (Supreme Court of the United States 1989, 492 U.S. 361)“…r by persons subject to Uniform Code of Military Justice); 18 U. S. C. §§ 32 , 33, and 34 (1982 ed. and Supp. V) (de…”
- United States v. Yousef (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2003, 327 F.3d 56)✓Yousef bombed a Philippine airliner and plotted to bomb twelve US flag airliners on Asian routes; the court held Section 32(a) reaches attacks on US flag aircraft worldwide, and that Yousef, brought here involuntarily, was found in the United States under Section 32(b).
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: California Drone Laws (2026): Privacy, Fires & Shoot-Down Rules, Oregon Drone Laws 2026: Police Warrants, Privacy & Penalties, Connecticut Drone Laws (2026): Privacy & Penalties
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- 11 Del. C. Section 1334 (Unlawful use of an unmanned aircraft system)(delcode.delaware.gov).gov
- 11 Del. C. Section 1335 (Violation of privacy)(delcode.delaware.gov).gov
- Delaware House Bill 30 (2019), 150th General Assembly, An Act to Amend Title 11 Relating to Unmanned Aircraft Systems(legis.delaware.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. Section 32 (Destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilities)(uscode.house.gov).gov
- Delaware Public Media, "New law makes dropping contraband into prisons from drones a felony"(delawarepublic.org)
- WMDT/47ABC, "Preventing contraband from being delivered by drones into Del. prisons" (Aug. 2019)(wmdt.com)
- 11 Del. C. Sections 4205 and 4208 (Sentence for felonies; Fines for organizations)(delcode.delaware.gov)
- 11 Del. C. Section 1256 (Promoting prison contraband, including delivery by unmanned aircraft system)(delcode.delaware.gov)