EnglishEspañol
Arkansas flag

Arkansas

Arkansas Defamation Laws: Libel, Slander & Suing (2026)

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited June 20, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Arkansas Defamation Laws: Libel, Slander & Suing (2026)

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue for defamation in Arkansas?

Yes. Arkansas recognizes civil claims for libel (written) and slander (spoken). You generally must prove a false statement of fact about you that was published to a third party, fault, and harm to your reputation, then file within the deadline for that type of defamation.

How long do I have to sue for defamation in Arkansas?

It depends on the type. Slander (spoken) must be filed within one year under Ark. Code 16-56-104, while libel (written) falls under the three-year period in Ark. Code 16-56-105. The clock generally runs from publication.

Is Arkansas a one-year defamation state?

Only for slander. Arkansas applies a one-year deadline to spoken defamation under Ark. Code 16-56-104, but written defamation (libel) gets the longer three-year period under Ark. Code 16-56-105, so the answer turns on whether the statement was spoken or written.

What is defamation per se in Arkansas?

Defamation per se covers statements treated as damaging on their face: accusing someone of a serious crime, imputing a loathsome disease, attacking their trade or profession, and imputing serious sexual misconduct. Arkansas abolished presumed damages in United Ins. Co. of America v. Murphy (1998), so even a per se plaintiff must prove actual injury to reputation.

Does Arkansas have an anti-SLAPP law?

Yes. Arkansas's anti-SLAPP statute is the Citizen Participation in Government Act, Ark. Code 16-63-501 through 16-63-508. It grants immunity for protected public-participation speech and imposes a verification requirement on claims that target such speech, with possible fee-shifting.

Can I sue over a bad online review in Arkansas?

Only if the review states a false fact rather than an opinion. A written review that falsely claims you committed a crime may be actionable as libel under the three-year deadline, while a subjective complaint about service or quality is generally protected opinion.

Is truth a defense to defamation in Arkansas?

Yes. Truth is a complete defense in Arkansas. If the challenged statement is substantially true, it cannot support a defamation claim regardless of how harmful it is to the plaintiff's reputation.

What is the difference between libel and slander in Arkansas?

Libel is defamation in written or recorded form, such as posts, articles, or emails, and gets a three-year deadline. Slander is spoken defamation and gets only one year. The form of the statement directly affects how long you have to sue.

Does Arkansas's anti-SLAPP law require anything special when I file?

If your claim targets protected public-participation speech, Ark. Code 16-63-505 requires you and your attorney to file a written verification under oath that the claim is grounded in fact and warranted by law. A false verification can lead to dismissal and fee-shifting.

Updates

Corrected the damages rules: Arkansas abolished presumed damages in 1998, so every defamation plaintiff must prove actual reputational injury even in a per se case; also removed a citation to a statute repealed in 2013, clarified the real scope of the state's anti-SLAPP law, and noted that the punitive damages cap statute was held unconstitutional.

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources

Sources and References

  1. Ark. Code 16-56-104, actions with limitation of one year (slander)(portal.arkansas.gov).gov
  2. Ark. Code 16-56-105, actions with limitation of three years (libel)(portal.arkansas.gov).gov
  3. Ark. Code 16-63-501 to 16-63-508, Citizen Participation in Government Act (anti-SLAPP immunity and verification requirement)(portal.arkansas.gov).gov
  4. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press: Arkansas anti-SLAPP, Ark. Code 16-63-501 to 16-63-508(rcfp.org)
  5. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), actual malice standard(law.cornell.edu)
  6. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974), private-figure fault standard(law.cornell.edu)
  7. United Ins. Co. of America v. Murphy, 331 Ark. 364, 961 S.W.2d 752 (1998), abolishing presumed damages and requiring proof of reputational injury(courtlistener.com)
  8. Dodson v. Allstate Insurance, 345 Ark. 430, 47 S.W.3d 866 (2001), confirming that presumed damages in defamation per se cases were abolished(courtlistener.com)
  9. Bayer CropScience LP v. Schafer, 2011 Ark. 518, 385 S.W.3d 822 (2011), holding the punitive damages cap in Ark. Code 16-55-208 unconstitutional(courtlistener.com)
Share: