Arkansas
Truck Accident Laws in Arkansas (2026): Deadlines & Liability
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited September 7, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

A commercial truck crash is not just a bigger car wreck. The vehicle is governed by a layer of federal safety rules, the company behind the driver is usually part of the case, and the insurance involved is far larger than a typical car policy. This guide explains the Arkansas rules that control a truck-injury or wrongful-death claim, from the filing deadline to how fault is shared, and then the uniform federal trucking rules that apply no matter which state the crash happened in. It is general information, not legal advice.
This page is part of our Truck Accident Laws by State series. Deadlines are strict and the facts of every crash differ, so treat the figures below as a starting point and confirm the current law before relying on it.
The Arkansas deadline to sue (statute of limitations)
In Arkansas, the clock is the first thing to protect. A personal-injury lawsuit arising from a truck crash must generally be filed within three years of the date of the collision under Arkansas Code 16-56-105, the state's three-year limitations statute for tort actions. If a loved one died, a wrongful-death action must be brought within three years of the date of death under Arkansas Code 16-62-102, and that statute also names who may sue: the personal representative of the estate, or, if there is none, the heirs at law.
A few situations change the math. Arkansas applies a discovery rule when an injury could not reasonably have been known right away, and the deadline is generally tolled for an injured minor until age 18. Claims against a government entity carry their own shorter notice rules. Because these exceptions are narrow and fact-specific, the safe assumption is that the three-year clock is running from the day of the crash.
How Arkansas splits fault: modified comparative negligence
Arkansas follows modified comparative fault with a 50% bar, set out in Arkansas Code 16-64-122. A jury assigns a percentage of fault to each party. If your fault is less than the combined fault of the parties you are suing, you recover your damages reduced by your own percentage. If your fault is equal to or greater than theirs, the statute bars recovery entirely. In plain terms, a plaintiff who is 49% at fault still recovers 51% of the damages, but a plaintiff who is 50% or more at fault recovers nothing.
This matters in truck cases because the defense will often try to shift blame onto the injured driver to push them over the 50% line. Evidence that the truck driver or carrier broke a federal safety rule, discussed below, is frequently what keeps the injured person's share of fault low.
No-fault and insurance in Arkansas
Arkansas is not a no-fault state. It uses a traditional at-fault, or tort, system, which means the driver who caused the crash and that driver's insurer (and the trucking company) are responsible for the harm. Arkansas does require insurers to offer personal-injury protection, but a driver can reject it in writing, so PIP is an optional add-on rather than a mandatory no-fault layer. Because there is no no-fault threshold to clear, an Arkansas truck-injury victim brings a standard liability claim.

Arkansas's minimum auto-liability limits are 25/50/25: $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident for bodily injury, and $25,000 for property damage. Those numbers are tiny next to the harm a loaded tractor-trailer can cause, which is why the federal trucking insurance minimum below is so important.
Damage caps in Arkansas
Arkansas is unusually protective of an injured person's right to full damages. The Arkansas Constitution bars the legislature from capping the recovery for personal injury or death (Ark. Const. art. 5, sec. 32), and the Arkansas Supreme Court relied on that protection to strike down the statutory cap on punitive damages in Bayer CropScience LP v. Schafer (2011). As a result, compensatory damages for a truck-crash injury or wrongful death are generally not capped in Arkansas. Claims against governmental defendants are an exception with their own limits.
Federal trucking rules: the FMCSA layer
Interstate commercial trucks are regulated by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, and its rules in Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations apply on every interstate route, Arkansas included. The rules that matter most after a crash are:
- Hours of service (49 CFR Part 395): a property-carrying driver may drive at most 11 hours after 10 consecutive hours off duty, may not drive beyond the 14th hour after coming on duty, must take a 30-minute break after 8 hours of driving, and is capped at 60 hours in 7 days or 70 hours in 8 days. Fatigue-rule violations are a leading cause of serious truck crashes.
- Electronic logging devices (ELDs): most drivers must record their duty status with an ELD, which makes the hours-of-service data far harder to falsify and a key piece of evidence.
- Driver qualification and CDL (49 CFR Part 391): the carrier must confirm the driver is qualified, medically fit, and properly licensed.
- Drug and alcohol testing (49 CFR Part 382): pre-employment, random, and post-accident testing is required.
- Inspection and maintenance (49 CFR Part 396): the carrier must systematically inspect, repair, and maintain its vehicles and keep records.
A documented violation of any of these rules can be powerful evidence of negligence, which is why the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration regulations are central to a truck case.
Who can be held liable after a truck crash
A truck case routinely has more than one defendant, and several of them are companies. Potential defendants include the driver; the motor carrier, which is usually responsible for its driver's on-the-job conduct and can also be sued directly for negligent hiring, training, supervision, or maintenance; a freight broker or shipper; the company that loaded or secured the cargo if a load shift caused the crash; and a manufacturer if a defective brake, tire, or other part failed. Sorting out which entities are responsible, and lining them up against the 50% comparative-fault bar, is one of the main reasons truck cases are more complex than car cases.

Federal minimum insurance: $750,000 and up
Federal law requires far more coverage from interstate trucking companies than states require from ordinary drivers. Under 49 CFR 387.9, a for-hire carrier of general freight in interstate commerce must maintain at least $750,000 in public-liability coverage, and carriers hauling hazardous materials must carry up to $5,000,000. That is the financial reality behind why truck-crash claims are valued and defended so differently from the 25/50/25 minimum that applies to a typical Arkansas car.
Preserving the evidence before it disappears
Much of the best evidence in a truck case lives inside the truck and the carrier's files, and a lot of it can be overwritten or routinely discarded. ELD and logbook data, the engine control module (the truck's onboard "black box," which can record speed, braking, and throttle), dashcam footage, dispatch records, and maintenance files can all be lost within weeks. Because of that, a written preservation or spoliation letter sent to the carrier early, demanding that it keep this data, can make a decisive difference. The police crash report, photographs, and your medical records should be preserved on your side as well.
How injury cases are typically handled
Most personal-injury and wrongful-death lawyers in Arkansas work on a contingency fee, meaning the fee is a percentage of any recovery and there is usually no upfront charge, and most offer a free initial consultation. No lawyer can promise a particular result or dollar amount, because the outcome turns on liability, the available insurance, the comparative-fault split, and the specific harm proven. The practical takeaways are simple: the three-year clock is running, the evidence inside the truck is perishable, and the sooner the facts are pinned down, the better the record will be.

Frequently Asked Questions
What is the deadline to sue for a truck accident in Arkansas?
Generally three years. Arkansas Code 16-56-105 gives an injured person three years from the date of the crash to file a personal-injury lawsuit, and Arkansas Code 16-62-102 gives the estate or heirs three years from the date of death to file a wrongful-death claim. Narrow exceptions (such as injured minors, the discovery rule, and shorter notice rules for claims against the government) can change the deadline, so confirm your specific date.
Who can be sued after a truck accident in Arkansas?
Often several parties. The truck driver, the motor carrier (for its driver's conduct and for negligent hiring, training, supervision, or maintenance), a freight broker or shipper, the company that loaded or secured the cargo, and the manufacturer of a defective part can each be liable. Truck cases frequently involve multiple corporate defendants, which is a key difference from a car-accident case.
How is a truck accident different from a car accident?
Three big ways. Interstate trucks must follow federal FMCSA safety rules (hours of service, electronic logs, driver qualification, drug testing, maintenance) whose violations are evidence of negligence; the trucking company and other businesses are usually defendants, not just the driver; and federal law requires at least $750,000 in liability coverage, far above an ordinary car policy. The truck's electronic data must also be preserved quickly before it is overwritten.
How much is an Arkansas truck accident case worth?
There is no set figure and no one can promise an amount. Value depends on the severity of the injuries, the medical bills and lost income, the available insurance, and your share of fault under Arkansas's 50% comparative-fault bar. Arkansas generally does not cap compensatory damages for personal injury or wrongful death, but the actual recovery still depends on the proof in your specific case.
Is Arkansas a no-fault state for truck accidents?
No. Arkansas is an at-fault (tort) state, so you pursue the at-fault driver and trucking company rather than only your own insurer. Personal-injury protection is offered but can be rejected in writing, and serious truck-injury claims are handled as standard liability cases with no no-fault threshold to clear.
Injured in Arkansas? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Arkansas personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Repointed three statute citations to pages that carry the statute text.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Arkansas Code of 1987 Annotated
§ 16-64-122Comparative fault.In forcecited in 7 of our articles
(a) Except as otherwise provided under § 16-118-109, in all actions for damages for personal injuries or wrongful death or injury to property in which recovery is predicated upon fault, liability shall be determined by comparing the fault chargeable to a claiming party with the fault chargeable to
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at arkleg.state.ar.us
Cited in 51 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2017
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ouachita Wilderness Institute v. Mergen (Supreme Court of Arkansas 1997, 329 Ark. 405)“…ial Court declined to give a jury instruction patterned on Ark. Code Ann. § 16-64-122 (c) (Supp. 1995). That subsection, foun…”
- Skinner v. R.J. Griffin & Co. (Supreme Court of Arkansas 1993, 313 Ark. 430)“…ative fault is an affirmative defense, ARCP Rule 8(c), and Ark. Code Ann. § 16-64-122 (1987), in the pertinent part, provide…”
- Nationsbank, N.A. v. Murray Guard, Inc. (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2001, 343 Ark. 437)“…es from whom the claiming party seeks to recover damages.” Ark. Code Ann. § 16-64-122 . Just how this change of phrase was in…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do, Medical Malpractice Laws in Arkansas (2026): Deadlines & Caps, Arkansas Wrongful Death Laws (2026): Deadlines & Who Can Sue
§ 16-56-105Actions with limitation of three years.In forcecited in 6 of our articles
The following actions shall be commenced within three (3) years after the cause of action accrues: (1) All actions founded upon any contract, obligation, or liability not under seal and not in writing, excepting such as are brought upon the judgment or decree of some court of record of the United…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2020-11-06 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 252 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Arkansas courts apply the three-year period of Ark. Code Ann. 16-56-105(3) to fraud and other claims not on a written contract. Chalmers v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. (1996) held it runs from injury, not discovery, absent concealment; Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality v. Brighton Corp. (2003) held it does not bar the State.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Davis (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2002, 347 Ark. 566)✓A hog grower sued Tyson for fraud after it ended a bedded-floor program he had borrowed heavily to join. Applying the three-year period of section 16-56-105, the court held the suit timely because damages, an element of fraud, did not arise until Tyson cut off hogs in 1998.
- Chalmers v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. (Supreme Court of Arkansas 1996, 326 Ark. 895)✓A Toyota dealer sued over pricing that favored dealers across the state line. The court applied the three-year period of section 16-56-105(3) and affirmed summary judgment, holding the dealer's own 1987 and 1989 letters showed he knew or could have discovered the alleged wrong.
- Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality v. Brighton Corp. (Supreme Court of Arkansas 2003, 352 Ark. 396)✓Defendants argued the state agency's suit over PCB-contaminated oil at a defunct industrial site was barred by the three-year period of section 16-56-105(3). The court held limitations do not run against the State when it enforces public rights, so the action was not barred.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Arkansas Defamation Laws: Libel, Slander & Suing (2026), Arkansas Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability
Code of Federal Regulations Title 49
§ 387.9Financial responsibility, minimum levels.In forcecited in 52 of our articles
The minimum levels of financial responsibility referred to in § 387.7 are hereby prescribed as follows: Table 1 to § 387.9—Schedule of Limits—Public Liability Type of carriage Commodity transported January 1, 1985 (1) For-hire (In interstate or foreign commerce, with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Property (nonhazardous) $750,000 (2) For-hire and Private (In interstate, foreign, or intrastate commerce, with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Hazardous substances, as defined in 49 CFR 171.8, transported in bulk in cargo tanks, portable tanks, or hopper-type vehicles; in bulk Division 1.1, 1.2 or 1.3 materials; in bulk Division 2.3, Hazard Zone A material; in bulk Division 6.1, Packing Group I, Hazard Zone A material, in bulk Division 2.1 or 2.2 material; or highway route controlled quantities of a Class 7 material, as defined in 49 CFR 173.403 5,000,000 (3) For-hire and Private (In interstate or foreign commerce, in any quantity; or in intrastate commerce, in bulk only; with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Oil listed in 49 CFR 172.101; hazardous waste, hazardous materials, or hazardous substances defined in 49…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 45 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Yeates (2009) held an MCS-90 endorsement applies only where the underlying policy gives no coverage and the carrier's insurance falls below the minimums 49 CFR 387.9 prescribes. GREAT WEST CAS. v. General Cas. Co. of Wisconsin (2010) found that purpose met once other coverage exceeded the 387.9 amount.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- GREAT WEST CAS. v. General Cas. Co. of Wisconsin (District Court, D. Minnesota 2010, 734 F. Supp. 2d 718)“…ardous commodities is $750,000. 49 U.S.C. § 31139 (b)(2); 49 C.F.R. § 387.9 . Under the Federal Motor Carrie…”
- Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Yeates (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2009, 584 F.3d 868)✓A trucker's own insurer paid the Yeateses the full $750,000 that section 387.9 sets as the minimum for non-hazardous property, and the en banc court held a second insurer's MCS-90 endorsement was therefore never triggered and added no coverage.
- American Inter-Fidelity Exchange v. American Re-Insurance Company (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 1994, 17 F.3d 1018)✓A truck insurer sought reinsurance for $846,256 in deductibles it paid accident victims but could not collect; the court read the mandatory endorsement to require insurers to cover victims from the first dollar up to section 387.9's minimums, and reversed the dismissal.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Truck Accident Laws in Connecticut (2026): Deadlines & Liability, Truck Accident Laws in Alabama (2026): Deadlines & Liability, Truck Accident Laws in Iowa (2026): Deadlines & Liability
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Arkansas General Assembly, Arkansas Code: 16-56-105 (3-year personal-injury limitation), 16-62-102 (wrongful-death action and 3-year limitation), 16-64-122 (comparative fault, 50% bar)(law.justia.com)
- Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 49 CFR Part 395 (Hours of Service of Drivers) and Part 391 (driver qualification), Part 382 (drug/alcohol testing), Part 396 (inspection and maintenance)(ecfr.gov).gov
- Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 49 CFR 387.9 (minimum levels of financial responsibility; $750,000 general freight, up to $5,000,000 hazardous materials)(ecfr.gov).gov
- Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Regulations (Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations overview, hours of service, ELDs, driver qualification, maintenance)(fmcsa.dot.gov).gov
- CourtListener, Bayer CropScience LP v. Schafer, 2011 Ark. 518 (Ark. 2011) striking the statutory punitive-damages cap under Ark. Const. art. 5, sec. 32(courtlistener.com)