Florida
Florida Debt Collection Laws: The $750 Head of Family Rule, Garnishment, and Debt Time Limits
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 12, 2026). · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

No creditor in Florida can start taking your paycheck just because a debt is unpaid. With narrow exceptions such as child support, tax debts, and federally garnished student loans, a collector must first sue you, win a judgment, and then obtain a writ of garnishment from the court. That sequence matters, because the most common route to a garnished paycheck is a default judgment entered after the borrower ignored the lawsuit. Answering the summons, even without a lawyer, is the single most valuable step you can take, and Florida's head of family exemption gives many workers a complete defense once they claim it.
How Wage Garnishment Works in Florida
For most workers who are not supporting dependents, Florida follows the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act limits: a judgment creditor can take no more than the lesser of 25% of disposable earnings, or the amount by which weekly disposable earnings exceed 30 times the federal minimum wage, which is $217.50 a week at the current $7.25 federal rate. Disposable earnings are what remains after legally required deductions such as taxes and Social Security, not after voluntary deductions like insurance or a 401(k).
The far more important rule is Florida's head of family exemption in section 222.11. A head of family is any natural person providing more than one-half of the support for a child or other dependent. For that person, all disposable earnings at or below $750 a week are completely exempt from garnishment. Earnings above $750 a week can be garnished only if the person "has agreed otherwise in writing," and the statute makes that waiver hard to hide: it must be a separate document, in at least 14-point type, signed and dated by both the consumer and the creditor, and it must contain the statutory warning that income may be exempt for anyone providing more than half the support of a child or dependent. A waiver clause buried inside the loan paperwork does not satisfy section 222.11(2)(b).
How to claim the exemption: the 20-day deadline
The exemption is not automatic. When a writ of garnishment issues, the clerk attaches a notice listing the available exemptions, with the head of family exemption first. Under section 77.041, you must file a sworn, notarized claim of exemption within 20 days after receiving that notice. The creditor then has 8 business days from hand delivery, or 14 business days from mailing, to serve a sworn written statement contesting your claim. If it misses that deadline, no hearing is required and the clerk must automatically dissolve the writ.
Older articles and form packets still describe an affidavit procedure under section 222.12. That statute has been repealed. The 20-day sworn claim under section 77.041 is the current route, and relying on the old procedure can cost you the exemption.
Federal law adds one more protection: an employer may not fire you because your earnings were garnished for any one debt, under 15 U.S.C. 1674. Whether Florida law extends that protection beyond a single debt is not addressed by the statutes reviewed for this article.
Bank Account Protections
A judgment creditor can also serve a writ of garnishment on your bank. Florida gives garnished bank accounts several layers of protection:

- Earnings that were exempt as head of family wages remain exempt for 6 months after deposit into a financial institution, as long as the funds can be traced and identified. Commingling with other money does not automatically defeat the exemption under section 222.11(3).
- Federal benefits such as Social Security are protected by federal law, and banks must automatically shield an amount equal to the last two months of directly deposited federal benefits under 31 CFR Part 212 before freezing anything.
- Section 222.25 exempts a debtor's interest in a single motor vehicle up to $5,000, prescribed health aids, and the traceable deposit of an earned income tax credit refund. It also provides a $4,000 personal property wildcard, but only for debtors who do not claim or receive the benefits of a homestead exemption, and the wildcard does not apply against support debts.
Like the wage exemption, bank exemptions must be claimed through the same sworn claim of exemption process, on the same clock.
How Long Collectors Have to Sue: Florida's Statute of Limitations
Florida's core deadlines for debt lawsuits sit in section 95.11:
- Written contracts: 5 years, under section 95.11(2)(b).
- Oral contracts, open accounts, and store accounts: 4 years, under section 95.11(3)(j).
A citation note worth knowing: section 95.11 has been restructured by recent amendments, so the subsection numbers do not all line up with older write-ups. The four-year rule for a contract, obligation, or liability not founded on a written instrument, for the sale and delivery of goods, and for store accounts is in section 95.11(3)(j). Subsection (4) of the current statute is a different, narrower rule: a three-year period for an action to collect medical debt for services rendered by a facility licensed under chapter 395, running from the date the facility refers that debt to a third party for collection.
Promissory notes also take the 5-year written contract period. Florida's version of the Uniform Commercial Code, section 673.1181, expressly defers to chapter 95 rather than setting a separate 6-year note deadline. Where credit card debt falls is genuinely contested: Florida courts have litigated whether a card account is founded on a written instrument (5 years) or is an account subject to the 4-year rule, and the answer can turn on what documents the collector can produce. Do not assume either period applies to a card debt without advice on the specific facts.
Florida sits on the strict end of the revival spectrum. Under section 95.04, an acknowledgment of a time-barred debt, or a promise to pay it, must be in writing and signed by the person to be charged. A partial payment by itself does not restart the clock the way it does in states like Kansas. Expiration of the deadline does not erase the debt, though: it removes the collector's ability to sue, but the debt still exists, and negative credit reporting runs on its own separate clock of roughly 7 years under federal law.
For deadlines on other kinds of Florida lawsuits, see the Florida statute of limitations guide.
Rules Debt Collectors Must Follow
Third-party collectors working Florida debts are bound by the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: no harassment, no false statements about what they can do, no contact at unreasonable hours, and validation information when they first contact you. Under Regulation F, 12 CFR 1006.26, a debt collector must not sue or threaten to sue on a time-barred debt at all. Asking you to pay voluntarily remains legal, which is exactly why a small payment or a signed acknowledgment on very old debt is dangerous in states where it revives the claim; in Florida, only a signed writing does that, but a written acknowledgment can be as simple as a signed hardship letter, so be careful what you sign.
Florida adds its own layer through the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act, sections 559.55 through 559.785, and it is broader than the federal act in the way that matters most to readers. Section 559.72 opens "In collecting consumer debts, a person may not," and "a person" is not limited to the third-party collectors the FDCPA regulates. The definition of debt collector in section 559.55 excludes an officer or employee of a creditor collecting debts in the creditor's own name, so an original creditor that harasses you can sit outside the federal act while still answering to section 559.72.
The Florida list of prohibited conduct also covers ground the federal act does not squarely reach. Section 559.72(4) bars communicating or threatening to communicate with your employer before final judgment, unless you gave written permission, you acknowledged the debt in writing after it was placed for collection, or the statement is only a warning that your employer will be contacted once a judgment is obtained. Section 559.72(9) bars claiming, attempting, or threatening to enforce a debt when the person knows the debt is not legitimate, or asserting a legal right the person knows does not exist.
Enforcement is private. Under section 559.77 you may sue for actual damages plus additional statutory damages the court may allow, up to $1,000, together with court costs and reasonable attorney's fees, and the court may award punitive damages and injunctive relief. That action must be commenced within 2 years after the date the alleged violation occurred, which is a shorter clock than the deadline to sue on the debt itself.
One scope point on time-barred debt: Regulation F binds FDCPA debt collectors, so it does not by its own terms reach an original creditor suing on its own stale account. Section 559.72(9) is the Florida hook in that situation, though it turns on what the creditor knew about the claim, so it is a fact question rather than an automatic violation. Separately, a consumer collection agency generally may not do business in Florida without registering under chapter 559, part VI, and section 559.553 exempts original creditors from that registration requirement. That is one more reason the practice rules in section 559.72, rather than the registration list, are what protect you from a creditor collecting its own debt.
Car Repossession in Florida
Florida follows the standard self-help rule in section 679.609: after default, a lender may take possession of the collateral without going to court, but only if it can do so without a breach of the peace. What counts as a breach of the peace is defined by Florida case law rather than the statute, but physical confrontation, breaking into a locked garage, or continuing over your on-the-spot objection are the classic danger zones.

No general statute requiring a pre-repossession notice or right-to-cure period was identified in the Florida statutes reviewed for this article. Whether Florida's retail installment sales law or your own contract adds notice obligations in a particular case is a question worth putting to a lawyer before assuming the lender did everything correctly. After the sale, the lender must dispose of the vehicle in a commercially reasonable way, and any deficiency lawsuit against you is itself subject to the limitation periods above.
If You Are Being Garnished or Sued in Florida
Move in this order. First, answer the lawsuit before the deadline in the summons; a default judgment forfeits every defense, including the statute of limitations. Second, if a garnishment has already issued, file the sworn claim of exemption within 20 days, especially if you provide more than half the support for a child or dependent, because the head of family exemption can stop the garnishment entirely. Third, if a default judgment was entered against you without proper notice, ask the court about vacating it. Fourth, if the debt is old, check the dates before paying anything, and never sign an acknowledgment without understanding that a signed writing can revive an expired debt. Finally, if multiple judgments are stacking up, bankruptcy's automatic stay stops wage garnishment immediately, and Florida's generous exemptions carry into that process; see Florida bankruptcy laws for how that works.
Overwhelmed by debt? Get a free bankruptcy consultation
Bankruptcy can stop foreclosure, wage garnishment, and creditor calls, and which debts you can clear and what property you keep depend on your state's exemptions. Get a free, confidential consultation with a bankruptcy attorney to understand your options. There is no obligation.
Information last verified on 2026-08-12. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.

Related Resources
- Debt Collection Laws by State
- Statute of Limitations on Debt
- How to Stop Wage Garnishment
- Car Repossession Laws
- Florida Statute of Limitations
- Florida Bankruptcy Laws
Last updated: 2026-08-12.
More Florida Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Who counts as a head of family for Florida's garnishment exemption?
Any natural person who provides more than one-half of the support for a child or other dependent, under section 222.11(1)(c). If that describes you, all disposable earnings at or below $750 a week are fully exempt from garnishment, and higher earnings are exempt too unless you signed a qualifying separate written waiver.
What happens if I miss the 20-day deadline to claim my exemption?
The garnishment can proceed even though you would have qualified. The 77.041 claim of exemption must be sworn and filed within 20 days of receiving the notice. Missing the deadline does not erase the exemption forever, but it lets the creditor keep collecting while you try to assert it late, so treat the 20 days as hard.
Is the old section 222.12 affidavit still how you claim the head of family exemption?
No. Section 222.12 has been repealed. The current procedure is the sworn claim of exemption under section 77.041, filed with the court within 20 days. If the creditor does not contest your claim within 8 business days after hand delivery or 14 business days after mailing, the clerk must automatically dissolve the writ.
How long can a collector sue on a credit card debt in Florida?
It depends on how the account is characterized. Written contracts carry a 5-year deadline under section 95.11(2)(b) and open accounts carry 4 years under section 95.11(3)(j). Florida courts have gone both ways on credit cards depending on the documentation, so check the dates and get advice before assuming a lawsuit is timely or late.
Does Florida law protect me from an original creditor, or only from collection agencies?
Both. The Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act, section 559.72, says that in collecting consumer debts «a person may not» engage in the listed conduct, and that language reaches an original creditor collecting its own account, unlike the federal FDCPA, which mainly regulates third-party collectors. Section 559.77 gives you 2 years from the violation to sue for actual damages, up to $1,000 in additional statutory damages, court costs, and reasonable attorney's fees.
Does making a small payment restart the statute of limitations in Florida?
Not by itself. Under section 95.04, reviving a time-barred debt requires a written acknowledgment or promise signed by the debtor. That is stricter than states where any partial payment restarts the clock, but a signed writing, even an informal one, can still revive the debt, so be careful what you sign.
Can a creditor take money from my bank account in Florida?
Yes, with a judgment and a writ served on the bank, but exemptions apply. Head of family wages stay exempt for 6 months after deposit if traceable, two months of directly deposited federal benefits are automatically protected under federal rules, and a $4,000 wildcard is available if you do not claim homestead benefits. You must claim these exemptions promptly through the court.
Updates
Corrected the Florida statute of limitations citation for oral contracts, open accounts, and store accounts to section 95.11(3)(j), and added coverage of the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act, which reaches original creditors and gives Florida debtors their own damages claim.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Florida Statutes
§ 222.11Exemption of wages from garnishment.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) As used in this section, the term:(a) “Earnings” includes compensation paid or payable, in money of a sum certain, for personal services or labor whether denominated as wages, salary, commission, or bonus. (b) “Disposable earnings” means that part of the earnings of any head of family remaining after the deduction from those earnings of any amounts required by law to be withheld. (c) “Head of family” includes any natural person who is providing more than one-half of the support for a child or other dependent. (2)(a) All of the disposable earnings of a head of family whose disposable earnings are less than or equal to $750 a week are exempt from attachment or garnishment. (b) Disposable earnings of a head of a family, which are greater than $750 a week, may not be attached or garnished unless such person has agreed otherwise in writing. The agreement to waive the protection provided by this paragraph must:1. Be written in the same language as the contract or agreement to which the waiver relates; 2. Be contained in a separate document attached to the contract or agreement; and 3.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
Cited in 84 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Killian v. Lawson (1980) held that a divorced man whose alimony was his ex-wife's sole support was a head of family entitled to the section 222.11 wage exemption. Holmes v. Blazer Financial Services, Inc. (1979) read the pre-1985 text to end the exemption once wages were deposited, a reading the Legislature later overrode.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Killian v. Lawson (Supreme Court of Florida 1980, 387 So. 2d 960)✓A judgment creditor tried to garnish the wages of a divorced man whose $1,000 monthly alimony was his ex-wife's only income; the court held that court-ordered support duty made him head of a family entitled to the section 222.11 wage exemption.
- Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Payne (District Court of Appeal of Florida 1977, 345 So. 2d 730)“…d answered the writ, asserting as defenses that pursuant to Section 222.11, Florida Statutes (1971), the husband’s wages were not su…”
- Gibson v. Bennett (Supreme Court of Florida 1990, 561 So. 2d 565)“…an exception to the exemption from garnishment provided by section 222.11, Florida Statutes (1979), for the wages of a head of a fa…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy in Florida (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
§ 77.041Notice to individual defendant for claim of exemption from garnishment; procedure for hearing.In force
(1) Upon application for a writ of garnishment by a plaintiff, if the defendant is an individual, the clerk of the court shall attach to the writ the following “Notice to Defendant”:NOTICE TO DEFENDANT OF RIGHT AGAINST GARNISHMENT OF WAGES, MONEY, AND OTHER PROPERTY The Writ of Garnishment delivered to you with this Notice means that wages, money, and other property belonging to you have been garnished to pay a court judgment against you. HOWEVER, YOU MAY BE ABLE TO KEEP OR RECOVER YOUR WAGES, MONEY, OR PROPERTY. READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. State and federal laws provide that certain wages, money, and property, even if deposited in a bank, savings and loan, or credit union, may not be taken to pay certain types of court judgments. Such wages, money, and property are exempt from garnishment. The major exemptions are listed below on the form for Claim of Exemption and Request for Hearing. This list does not include all possible exemptions. You should consult a lawyer for specific advice.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
Cited in 26 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Zivitz v. Zivitz (District Court of Appeal of Florida 2009, 16 So. 3d 841)“…rett Meshad that same day. On January 17, 2008, pursuant to section 77.041, Florida Statutes (2007), Janice and Gary served Robert w…”
- Marquez v. BlueCare Home Health Svcs., Inc. (District Court of Appeal of Florida 2013, 116 So. 3d 563)“…d a Claim of Exemption and Request for Hearing, pursuant to section 77.041, Florida Statutes (2012), asserting that the Wells Fargo…”
- Nedzad Miljkovic v. Shafritz and Dinkin, P.A. (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2015, 791 F.3d 1291)“…f exemption before an evidentiary hearing will be set. See Fla. Stat. § 77.041(3). The sworn reply, Appellees averred,…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 95.11Limitations other than for the recovery of real property.In forcecited in 12 of our articles
Actions other than for recovery of real property shall be commenced as follows:(1) WITHIN TWENTY YEARS.—An action on a judgment or decree of a court of record in this state. (2) WITHIN FIVE YEARS.—(a) An action on a judgment or decree of any court, not of record, of this state or any court of the United States, any other state or territory in the United States, or a foreign country. (b) A legal or equitable action on a contract, obligation, or liability founded on a written instrument, except for an action to enforce a claim against a payment bond, which shall be governed by the applicable provisions of paragraph (6)(e), s. 255.05(10), s. 337.18(1), or s. 713.23(1)(e), and except for an action for a deficiency judgment governed by paragraph (6)(g). (c) An action to foreclose a mortgage. (d) An action alleging a willful violation of s. 448.110. (e) Notwithstanding paragraph (b), an action for breach of a property insurance contract, with the period running from the date of loss. (3) WITHIN FOUR YEARS.—(a) An action relating to the determination of paternity, with the time running from the date the child reaches the age of majority.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
Cited in 698 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Merkle v. Robinson (1999) held that the significant relationship test governs conflict of law questions about section 95.11, so a claim time-barred in Florida may proceed under another state's period. Foley v. Morris (1976) applied a shortened 95.11 period to a pre-existing claim where the plaintiff still had the full new period.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Merkle v. Robinson (Supreme Court of Florida 1999, 737 So. 2d 540)✓A West Virginia patient sued a doctor's estate in Florida, where he had retired; her claim was untimely under Florida law but not West Virginia's. The court held the significant relationship test governs conflicts involving section 95.11, so West Virginia's period applied.
- Foley v. Morris (District Court of Appeal of Florida 1976, 325 So. 2d 37)✓A surgeon left a rubber drain in a patient in 1971; suit came in 1974, after Florida replaced the four-year period with the two-year medical malpractice period in section 95.11(6). The court applied the new period from its effective date and affirmed dismissal.
- State ex rel. Gerstein v. Hialeah Race Course, Inc. (Supreme Court of Florida 1971, 245 So. 2d 53)✓A state attorney sued racetrack operators over political contributions. Holding the campaign statute's four-year period unconstitutional as applied, the court ruled the general one-year limit in section 95.11(7)(a) governed, so the late complaint was properly dismissed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Florida Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Florida Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do, Florida Car Accident Laws: No-Fault, PIP, and Your Claim
§ 222.25Other individual property of natural persons exempt from legal process.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
The following property is exempt from attachment, garnishment, or other legal process:(1) A debtor’s interest, not to exceed $5,000 in value, in a single motor vehicle as defined in s. 320.01(1). (2) A debtor’s interest in any professionally prescribed health aids for the debtor or a dependent of the debtor. (3) A debtor’s interest in a refund or a credit received or to be received, or the traceable deposits in a financial institution of a debtor’s interest in a refund or credit, pursuant to s. 32 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. This exemption does not apply to a debt owed for child support or spousal support. (4) A debtor’s interest in personal property, not to exceed $4,000, if the debtor does not claim or receive the benefits of a homestead exemption under s. 4, Art. X of the State Constitution. This exemption does not apply to a debt owed for child support or spousal support.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
Cited in 62 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Osborne v. Dumoulin (Supreme Court of Florida 2011, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 43)“…d to the additional exemptions for personal property under Fla. Stat. § 222.25 (4). Osborne v. Dumoulin (In…”
- In Re Gatto (United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida 2008, 380 B.R. 88)“…d exemption under s. 4, Art. X of the State Constitution.” Fla. Stat. § 222.25 (4) (2007). In interpreting the…”
- In Re Bennett (United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida 2008, 395 B.R. 781)“…4,000 of personal property as exempt from legal process. Fla. Stat. § 222.25 (4) (2007) (“Statutory Exemption”). In…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 95.04Promise to pay barred debt.In force
An acknowledgment of, or promise to pay, a debt barred by a statute of limitations must be in writing and signed by the person sought to be charged.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2017
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Nolden v. Nolden (District Court of Appeal of Florida 1995, 650 So. 2d 84)“…statute of limitations, was revived under the provisions of section 95.04, Florida Statutes: An acknowledgment of or a promise to…”
- Deakter v. Menendez (District Court of Appeal of Florida 2002, 830 So. 2d 124)“…gests, any claim on the 1988 notes was time-barred in 1995, section 95.04, Florida Statutes (1982), provides that a promise to pay…”
- Sebastian Enterprises, Inc. v. Florida First National Bank at Vero Beach (District Court of Appeal of Florida 1977, 345 So. 2d 827)“…nder Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1975) was applicable. Section 95.04, Florida Statutes (1975) provides “an acknowledgement of…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 679.609Secured party’s right to take possession after default.In force
(1) After default, a secured party:(a) May take possession of the collateral; and (b) Without removal, may render equipment unusable and dispose of collateral on a debtor’s premises under s. 679.610. (2) A secured party may proceed under subsection (1):(a) Pursuant to judicial process; or (b) Without judicial process, if it proceeds without breach of the peace. (3) If so agreed, and in any event after default, a secured party may require the debtor to assemble the collateral and make it available to the secured party at a place to be designated by the secured party which is reasonably convenient to both parties.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.fl.us
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Justin Mooney and Katarina A. Korray v. Color Le Palais of Boynton Beach Homeowners Association, Inc. (District Court of Appeal of Florida 2025)“…where it can be accomplished without a breach of the peace. Section 679.609, Florida Statutes (2025), states that after default, a se…”
- WILLIAM A. HOHNS, MARCELLUS RAMBO BENSON, JR., KATHLENE HOHNS, JORDAN J. REARDON, PATRICK HOHNS, AND MARK F. BERNARD vs JOE LEE THOMPSON (District Court of Appeal of Florida 2022)“…in Toyosity by virtue of his default under the note. Section 679.609, Florida Statutes, provides that, after default, a secur…”
- Comerica Bank v. Mann (District Court, N.D. Georgia 2013, 13 F. Supp. 3d 1262)“…cle 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), as codified in Fla. Stat. Ann. § 679.609 (1), a secured party may take possessio…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 12
§ 1006.26Collection of time-barred debts.In forcecited in 37 of our articles
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section: (1) Statute of limitations means the period prescribed by applicable law for bringing a legal action against the consumer to collect a debt. (2) Time-barred debt means a debt for which the applicable statute of limitations has expired. (b) Legal actions and threats of legal actions prohibited. A debt collector must not bring or threaten to bring a legal action against a consumer to collect a time-barred debt. This paragraph (b) does not apply to proofs of claim filed in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (2024) dismissed FDCPA claims built on 12 CFR 1006.26(b), reasoning it bars only collection of time-barred debts and the loans at issue were not time barred. Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (2025) dismissed a Regulation F claim because nonjudicial foreclosure is not covered by the FDCPA.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2024)✓A borrower claimed a servicer's letter and billing statement lacked language required by 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court granted the servicer summary judgment, since the rule only bars collecting time-barred debts and it had already found her HELOC and mortgage enforceable.
- Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2025)✓Pro se homeowners alleged a servicer and foreclosure attorneys pursued a time-barred, discharged second mortgage in violation of 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court dismissed that claim, holding parties carrying out a nonjudicial foreclosure are not FDCPA debt collectors.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Debt Collection Laws: Garnishment Limits, Debt Deadlines, and Repossession, Maine Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Michigan Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
United States Code Title 15
§ 1674Restriction on discharge from employment by reason of garnishmentIn forcecited in 15 of our articles
No employer may discharge any employee by reason of the fact that his earnings have been subjected to garnishment for any one indebtedness. Whoever willfully violates subsection (a) of this section shall be fined not more than $1,000, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 48 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Federal appeals courts have held that 15 U.S.C. 1674 gives no private right of action to an employee fired over a garnishment. Smith v. Cotton Brothers Baking Co., Inc. (1980) found no implied civil remedy, and Le Vick v. Skaggs Companies, Inc. (1983) agreed, leaving enforcement to the Secretary of Labor under Section 1676.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- James E. Le Vick v. Skaggs Companies, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 1983, 701 F.2d 777)✓An employee fired after his wages were garnished sued his employer under 15 U.S.C. 1674(a); the Ninth Circuit declined to follow its own Stewart precedent and held Congress created no private right of action, leaving enforcement to the Secretary of Labor.
- Hodgson v. Cleveland Municipal Court (District Court, N.D. Ohio 1971, 326 F. Supp. 419)✓The Secretary of Labor argued federal garnishment law preempted Ohio's narrower anti-discharge provision; the court found no showing that 15 U.S.C. 1674, a self-enforcing criminal section, was frustrated by the Ohio statute, and no justiciable controversy under it.
- Reginald O. Wallace v. Debron Corporation (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 1974, 494 F.2d 674)✓A Black welder was fired under a rule barring two garnishments in a year; reversing summary judgment on his Title VII disparate-impact claim, the Eighth Circuit read 15 U.S.C. 1674 as preventing discharge for one indebtedness, not authorizing it for others.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Georgia Debt Collection Laws: Garnishment Caps, the 10-Day Repo Notice, and Debt Time Limits, Alabama Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Fla. Stat. 222.11, Exemption of wages from garnishment(flsenate.gov).gov
- Fla. Stat. 77.041, Notice to individual defendant; claim of exemption procedure(flsenate.gov).gov
- Fla. Stat. 95.11, Limitations other than for the recovery of real property(flsenate.gov).gov
- Fla. Stat. 95.04, Promise to pay barred debt(flsenate.gov).gov
- Fla. Stat. 222.25, Other individual property of natural persons exempt from legal process(flsenate.gov).gov
- Fla. Stat. 679.609, Secured party's right to take possession after default(flsenate.gov).gov
- 12 CFR 1006.26, Collection of time-barred debts (Regulation F)(ecfr.gov).gov
- Fla. Stat. 559.72, Prohibited practices generally (Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act)(leg.state.fl.us)
- Fla. Stat. 559.77, Civil remedies(leg.state.fl.us)
- Fla. Stat. 559.55, Definitions (Consumer Collection Practices)(leg.state.fl.us)
- Fla. Stat. 559.553, Registration of consumer collection agencies required(leg.state.fl.us)