Vermont
Bankruptcy in Vermont (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Bankruptcy is a federal process, but Vermont is one of the states that lets filers choose between two exemption systems, and it offers a notably high fixed homestead. Vermont has not opted out of the federal bankruptcy exemptions, so a Vermont filer may use either the Vermont state exemptions or the federal list in 11 U.S.C. 522(d), whichever protects more property, but cannot mix the two. The figures below are current as of mid-2026, and you should confirm the latest amounts before relying on them.
This page is general legal information, not legal advice. It is part of our Bankruptcy by State series.
Does Vermont use state or federal bankruptcy exemptions?
Vermont gives filers a choice. The state has not exercised the opt-out authority in 11 U.S.C. 522(b)(2), so a Vermont debtor may elect either the Vermont state exemptions or the federal exemptions in 11 U.S.C. 522(d). You cannot mix categories from the two systems; you choose one list and apply it to all of your property.
In practice the decision usually turns on home equity. Vermont's state homestead of $125,000 is far larger than the federal homestead, so homeowners with equity typically choose the state exemptions. Renters or filers with little home equity sometimes prefer the federal set, which includes a larger general wildcard. To claim Vermont exemptions, the residency and domicile rules in 11 U.S.C. 522(b)(3) generally require domicile in Vermont for the 730 days before filing; otherwise an earlier state's rules, or the federal exemptions, may apply. Federal nonbankruptcy protections like Social Security continue to apply either way.
Vermont's homestead exemption
Vermont's homestead is the state's headline protection. Under 27 V.S.A. 101, the homestead of a natural person, consisting of a dwelling house, outbuildings, and the land used in connection with them, is exempt from attachment and execution up to $125,000 in value. That is a relatively high fixed figure compared with many states, and it can protect a meaningful share of a Vermont home's equity.

The amount is fixed by statute, not indexed for inflation. The Legislature raised it from $75,000 to $125,000 in 2009 Act 55, Sec. 8, effective July 1, 2009, and it has stayed at that level since, so it does not drift upward each year the way an indexed homestead does. A 2023 technical-corrections act reworded the section but left the $125,000 figure unchanged. The exemption protects equity, meaning value after mortgages and liens, and does not defeat a consensual lien such as a mortgage. Married couples and co-owners should check how the homestead applies to their specific ownership, because the protection attaches to the homestead property rather than automatically doubling.
Vehicle, wildcard, and personal-property exemptions
Vermont's personal-property exemptions are set mainly in 12 V.S.A. 2740:
- Motor vehicle: up to $2,500 of aggregate equity in one or more motor vehicles.
- Wildcard: $400 in any property, plus up to $7,000 of any unused amount of the motor-vehicle, tools-of-trade, jewelry, and certain household exemptions, which can be applied to property that has no other category.
- Household furnishings: up to $2,500 in aggregate value in household furnishings, goods, appliances, books, wearing apparel, animals, crops, or musical instruments held primarily for personal, family, or household use.
- Basic appliances with no dollar cap: a separate subdivision exempts one cooking stove, appliances needed for heating, one refrigerator, one freezer, one water heater, and sewing machines outright.
- Tools of trade: professional or trade books and tools up to a set amount.
- Jewelry: a wedding ring without limit, plus other jewelry up to a set amount.
- Growing crops, livestock, and farm animals up to set amounts, and a range of benefits such as Social Security, unemployment, workers' compensation, and certain support payments.
Wages also receive protection. Under 12 V.S.A. 3170, most of a debtor's earnings are exempt from garnishment, with the protected share tied to a multiple of the federal minimum wage. The combination of a generous wildcard and a high homestead makes Vermont's state list attractive to many filers, though the federal list can still win for someone with little home equity.
The Chapter 7 means test in Vermont
The means test screens who can file Chapter 7. It first compares your household's current monthly income, annualized, against the median family income for a Vermont household of the same size. If your income is at or below the Vermont median, you generally clear this step. If it is above, you complete the longer calculation that deducts allowed living expenses to see whether you have disposable income that should fund a Chapter 13 plan.
The U.S. Trustee Program publishes the median figures. For cases filed on or after April 1, 2026, the Vermont median family income is:
| Household size | Vermont median annual income |
|---|---|
| 1 | $72,461 |
| 2 | $96,963 |
| 3 | $114,075 |
| 4 | $137,583 |
Add $11,100 for each additional person beyond four. These figures apply only to cases filed on or after April 1, 2026, and the U.S. Trustee Program revises them about twice a year, so confirm the figures for your filing date.
Chapter 7 vs. Chapter 13 in Vermont
Chapter 7 is a liquidation in which a trustee may sell non-exempt property to pay creditors. Because Vermont's homestead is high and filers can instead choose the federal exemptions when those protect more, many Vermont filers keep everything they own. Most remaining unsecured debt, like credit cards and medical bills, is discharged within about four to six months.

Chapter 13 is a reorganization for people with regular income. You keep your property and repay part or all of your debt over three to five years. It is often used by homeowners who are behind on a mortgage, because the plan can cure the arrears over time and stop a foreclosure, and by filers whose income is above the median.
In both chapters, filing triggers the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. 362, which immediately stops most collection activity, including foreclosure, wage garnishment, repossession, and collection calls.
Where you file bankruptcy in Vermont
Vermont is a single federal judicial district, so all cases are filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Vermont. The court sits in Burlington, with proceedings also handled in Rutland. You file in the district where you have lived for the greater part of the last 180 days. Federal law requires approved credit counseling before you file and a debtor-education course before discharge.
What bankruptcy can and cannot do
Bankruptcy discharges most unsecured debts, but several categories generally survive: most student loans (absent a separate showing of undue hardship), recent income taxes, child support and alimony, and debts from fraud or willful injury. Secured debts like a mortgage or car loan continue if you keep the collateral and keep paying.

Because Vermont lets you choose between two exemption systems, and because the better choice depends on your home equity and the mix of your assets, the decision can meaningfully change what you keep. Many people consult a licensed Vermont bankruptcy attorney before filing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Vermont use state or federal bankruptcy exemptions?
Vermont lets filers choose. It has not opted out of the federal exemptions, so a debtor may use either the Vermont state exemptions or the federal list in 11 U.S.C. 522(d), but cannot combine the two. Homeowners with equity usually choose the Vermont exemptions because the state homestead is larger than the federal one.
What is the homestead exemption in Vermont?
Under 27 V.S.A. 101, Vermont's homestead exemption protects up to $125,000 of equity in a dwelling, its outbuildings, and the land used with it. It is a fixed statutory amount, set at $125,000 by 2009 Act 55, Sec. 8, effective July 1, 2009, and not inflation-indexed, so it stays the same until the Legislature changes it.
What is the Vermont median income for the means test?
For cases filed on or after April 1, 2026, the U.S. Trustee Program lists Vermont median family income as $72,461 for 1 person, $96,963 for 2, $114,075 for 3, and $137,583 for 4, plus $11,100 for each additional person. These figures update about twice a year.
Will I lose my house or car if I file bankruptcy in Vermont?
Not automatically. Vermont's homestead protects up to $125,000 of equity in a qualifying home, and a filer who would do better under the federal exemptions may choose those instead. A vehicle is protected up to $2,500 in equity, and the wildcard can sometimes cover more. Outcomes depend on your equity and whether you stay current on secured payments. This is general information, not advice about your case.
Does Vermont have a wildcard exemption?
Yes. Under 12 V.S.A. 2740, Vermont provides a $400 wildcard in any property, plus up to $7,000 of unused amounts from the motor-vehicle, tools-of-trade, jewelry, and certain household exemptions, which can be applied to property that has no other category.
Is Vermont's homestead amount adjusted for inflation?
No. The $125,000 homestead under 27 V.S.A. 101 is a fixed statutory figure that the Legislature set effective July 1, 2009 (2009 Act 55, Sec. 8). It does not change each year for inflation; it stays at that level until lawmakers amend the statute.
Where do I file for bankruptcy in Vermont?
Vermont is a single district, so all cases are filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Vermont, which sits in Burlington with proceedings also handled in Rutland. You file there after completing approved credit counseling.
What debts cannot be discharged in a Vermont bankruptcy?
The non-dischargeable categories are federal and apply nationwide. They generally include most student loans, recent income taxes, child support and alimony, and debts from fraud or willful injury. Most credit-card and medical debt is dischargeable.
Overwhelmed by debt in Vermont? Get a free bankruptcy consultation
Bankruptcy can stop foreclosure, wage garnishment, and creditor calls, and which debts you can clear and what property you keep depend on Vermont's exemptions. Get a free, confidential consultation with a Vermont bankruptcy attorney to understand your options. There is no obligation.
Updates
Corrected the date the Vermont homestead exemption was set at $125,000 to July 1, 2009 (2009 Act 55) rather than 2023, and separated the uncapped basic-appliance exemption from the $2,500 household-furnishings cap under 12 V.S.A. 2740.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Vermont Statutes Annotated, Title 27: Property, Chapter 3: Estates of Homestead, Subchapter: GENERAL PROVISIONS
§ 101Definition; exemption from attachment and executionIn force
The homestead of a natural person consisting of a dwelling house, outbuildings, and the land used in connection therewith, not exceeding $125,000.00 in value, and owned and used or kept by the person as a homestead together with the rents, issues, profits, and products thereof, shall be exempt from attachment and execution except as otherwise provided in this chapter. (Amended 1967, No. 287 (Adj. Sess.), § 1; 1979, No. 67, § 7; 1995, No. 186 (Adj. Sess.), § 24a, eff. Jan. 1, 1997; 2009, No. 55, § 8; 2023, No. 6, § 314, eff. July 1, 2023.)
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.vermont.gov
Cited in 49 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Mercier v. Partlow (Supreme Court of Vermont 1988, 149 Vt. 523)“…nvolves the scope of the homestead exemption established by 27 V.S.A. § 101 on property that is subject to a mortga…”
- Estate of Girard v. Laird (Supreme Court of Vermont 1993, 159 Vt. 508)“…ned and used or kept by [a natural] person as a homestead.” 27 V.S.A. § 101. As plaintiff emphasizes, we hav…”
- Weale v. Lund (Supreme Court of Vermont 2006, 180 Vt. 551)“…t their homestead property is exempt from foreclosure under 27 V.S.A. § 101. The superior court rejected defendants…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Vermont Statutes Annotated, Title 12: Court Procedure, Chapter 111: Levy of Execution, Subchapter: PERSONAL PROPERTY, LEVY, AND SALE
§ 2740Goods and chattels; exemptions fromIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
The goods or chattels of a debtor may be taken and sold on execution, except the following articles, which shall be exempt from attachment and execution, unless turned out to the officer to be taken on the attachment or execution, by the debtor: (1) the debtor’s interest, not to exceed $2,500.00 in aggregate value, in a motor vehicle or motor vehicles; (2) the debtor’s interest, not to exceed $5,000.00 in aggregate value, in professional or trade books or tools of the profession or trade of the debtor or a dependent of the debtor; (3) a wedding ring; (4) the debtor’s interest, not to exceed $500.00 in aggregate value, in other jewelry held primarily for the personal, family, or household use of the debtor or a dependent of the debtor; (5) the debtor’s interest, not to exceed $2,500.00 in aggregate value, in household furnishings, goods or appliances, books, wearing apparel, animals, crops, or musical instruments that are held primarily for the personal, family, or household use of the debtor or a dependent of the debtor; (6) growing crops, not to exceed $5,000.00 in aggregate value; (7) the debtor’s aggregate interest in any property, not to exceed $400.00 in value, plus up…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.vermont.gov
Cited in 18 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Estate of Jamis J. Lott v. Robin O'Neill (Supreme Court of Vermont 2017, 165 A.3d 1099)“…101 ; a debtor's interest in a motor vehicle up to $2500, 12 V.S.A. § 2740(1) ; or a debtor's professional or trad…”
- Licursi v. Sweeney (Supreme Court of Vermont 1991, 157 Vt. 599)“…alf was exempt from trustee process under the provisions of 12 V.S.A. § 2740. 1 On August 3, 1990, the…”
- Ronald Geraw v. Pamela Geraw (Supreme Court of Vermont 2021, 2021 VT 45)“…r, husband asserts that the tractor should be exempt under 12 V.S.A. § 2740(19) because it is “reasonably necessary…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Vermont Debt Collection Laws: The 85% Consumer-Debt Shield, and a Medical-Debt Ban That Is Not Actually Law
Vermont Statutes Annotated, Title 12: Court Procedure, Chapter 121: Trustee Process, Subchapter: PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS
§ 3170Exemptions; issuance of orderIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) No order approving the issuance of trustee process against earnings shall be entered against a judgment debtor who was, within the two-month period preceding the hearing provided in section 3169 of this title, a recipient of assistance from the Vermont Department for Children and Families or the Department of Vermont Health Access. The judgment debtor must establish this exemption at the time of hearing. (b) The earnings of a judgment debtor shall be exempt as follows: (1) 75 percent of the debtor’s weekly disposable earnings, or 30 times the federal minimum hourly wage, whichever is greater; or (2) if the judgment debt arose from a consumer credit transaction, as that term is defined by 15 U.S.C. § 1602 and implementing regulations of the Federal Reserve Board, 85 percent of the debtor’s weekly disposable earnings, or 40 times the federal minimum hourly wage, whichever is greater; or (3) if the court finds that the weekly expenses reasonably incurred by the debtor for his or her maintenance and that of dependents exceed the amounts exempted by subdivisions (1) and (2) of this subsection, such greater amount of earnings as the court shall order.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.vermont.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Olson v. Townsend (Supreme Court of Vermont 1987, 148 Vt. 135)“…fies as “earnings” and is exempt from trustee process under 12 V.S.A. § 3170(b)(1), which states: *136…”
- dept labor v. greene (Vermont Superior Court 2024)“…security payments or disability payments. 12 V.S.A. § 2740; 12 V.S.A. § 3170; 27 V.S.A. § 101. It is typicall…”
- Welch v. Lyford (Vermont Superior Court 2025)“…fits like reach-up or Dr. Dynasaur, their income is exempt. 12 V.S.A. § 3170. Given that there has been a j…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 11
§ 522ExemptionsIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
In this section— “dependent” includes spouse, whether or not actually dependent; and “value” means fair market value as of the date of the filing of the petition or, with respect to property that becomes property of the estate after such date, as of the date such property becomes property of the estate. Notwithstanding section 541 of this title, an individual debtor may exempt from property of the estate the property listed in either paragraph (2) or, in the alternative, paragraph (3) of this subsection. In joint cases filed under section 302 of this title and individual cases filed under section 301 or 303 of this title by or against debtors who are husband and wife, and whose estates are ordered to be jointly administered under Rule 1015(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, one debtor may not elect to exempt property listed in paragraph (2) and the other debtor elect to exempt property listed in paragraph (3) of this subsection. If the parties cannot agree on the alternative to be elected, they shall be deemed to elect paragraph (2), where such election is permitted under the law of the jurisdiction where the case is filed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 7,574 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz (1992) held that a trustee who does not object within the 30-day period cannot later challenge an exemption claimed under 522(l), even one with no statutory basis. Owen v. Owen (1991) held that 522(f) lien avoidance is not defeated by a state exemption written to exclude lien-encumbered property.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz (Supreme Court of the United States 1992, 503 U.S. 638)✓A Chapter 7 debtor listed the entire proceeds of her TWA discrimination suit as exempt and the trustee let the 30-day objection window lapse; the Court held that under § 522(l) the property is exempt once no one objects, even absent a colorable statutory basis.
- Patterson v. Shumate (Supreme Court of the United States 1992, 504 U.S. 753)✓A debtor's $250,000 ERISA pension interest was excluded from his estate under § 541(c)(2); answering a surplusage argument, the Court read § 522(d)(10)(E) as exempting a broader set of plans, and expressly declined to decide whether § 522(b)(2)(A) also applied.
- Owen v. Owen (Supreme Court of the United States 1991, 500 U.S. 305)✓An ex-wife's judgment lien attached to a Florida condo before state law made it a homestead; the Court held § 522(f) measures impairment against the exemption the debtor would have had but for the lien, so Florida's carve-out for prior liens did not defeat avoidance.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy Laws by State (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Bankruptcy in Alaska (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Bankruptcy in Arkansas (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
§ 362Automatic stayIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a petition filed under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or an application filed under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, operates as a stay, applicable to all entities, of— the commencement or continuation, including the issuance or employment of process, of a judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been commenced before the commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under this title; the enforcement, against the debtor or against property of the estate, of a judgment obtained before the commencement of the case under this title; any act to obtain possession of property of the estate or of property from the estate or to exercise control over property of the estate; any act to create, perfect, or enforce any lien against property of the estate; any act to create, perfect, or enforce against property of the debtor any lien to the extent that such lien secures a claim that arose before the commencement of the case under this title; any act to…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 19,606 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. (1988) held that an undersecured creditor gets no interest as adequate protection under 362(d)(1) for delay caused by the stay. NLRB v. Bildisco & Bildisco (1984) applied 362(a) in requiring claims be pursued through bankruptcy administration, not suit.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Clinton v. Jones (Supreme Court of the United States 1997, 520 U.S. 681)“…ublic interests. Brief for Petitioner 34-36. See, e. g., 11 U. S. C. § 362 (litigation against debtor stayed upon…”
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. (Supreme Court of the United States 1988, 484 U.S. 365)✓An undersecured lender on a Houston apartment project sought monthly payments as the price of continuing the § 362(a) automatic stay; the Court held that 'adequate protection' under § 362(d)(1) does not entitle it to interest for the delay in foreclosing on its collateral.
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1987, 481 U.S. 1)“…if it were forced to file for bankruptcy under Chapter 11. 11 U. S. C. §362 . Texaco, or its successor in interest,…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy in Arizona (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Bankruptcy in Alabama (2026): Exemptions & Means Test, Bankruptcy in Georgia (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- 27 V.S.A. 101, Vermont homestead exemption ($125,000, fixed effective July 1, 2023)(legislature.vermont.gov).gov
- 12 V.S.A. 2740, Vermont personal-property exemptions ($2,500 motor vehicle, $400 + $7,000 wildcard, household goods, tools of trade, jewelry, benefits)(legislature.vermont.gov).gov
- 12 V.S.A. 3170, Vermont wage-garnishment protection tied to the federal minimum wage(legislature.vermont.gov).gov
- U.S. Trustee Program, Census Bureau Median Family Income by family size, cases filed on or after April 1, 2026(justice.gov).gov
- 11 U.S.C. 522, the federal exemptions Vermont filers may choose and the 522(b)(2) opt-out authority Vermont did not exercise(law.cornell.edu)
- U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Vermont (Burlington and Rutland)(vtb.uscourts.gov).gov
- 2009 Vermont Act 55 (S.26), Sec. 8, raising the 27 V.S.A. 101 homestead exemption from $75,000 to $125,000, effective July 1, 2009 under Sec. 14(b)(legislature.vermont.gov)
- 2023 Vermont Act 6 (H.466), technical corrections, Sec. 314 amending 27 V.S.A. 101 for style only and leaving the $125,000 homestead figure unchanged(legislature.vermont.gov)