Minnesota
Minnesota Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 12, 2026). · 11 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

If a collector is pursuing you in Minnesota, start with the process, not the fear. A private creditor has to sue you, win a judgment, and get a garnishment order before a dollar can be taken from your paycheck or bank account. The two beliefs that cause the most damage, that garnishment happens the moment you fall behind, and that an unanswered lawsuit simply goes away, are both wrong. Most Minnesota garnishments trace back to a default judgment entered because the person being sued never answered the complaint, which makes responding to a summons the single most valuable thing you can do.
Minnesota also just rebuilt its garnishment law from the ground up. The 2024 Debt Fairness Act replaced the old federal-copy formula with a tiered system that protects more income at the bottom of the wage scale, and it is worth understanding exactly, because press summaries of the law have circulated a tier that does not actually exist in the statute.
Wage Garnishment in Minnesota
Minnesota rebuilt its wage-garnishment formula with the 2024 Debt Fairness Act, later amended in a 2025 special session, and it now protects considerably more income than the plain federal formula at the lower end of the wage scale. Under Minn. Stat. Section 571.922, a creditor can take the lesser of two amounts: a tiered percentage of disposable earnings, or the amount by which disposable earnings exceed 40 times the reference wage.
The tiers are 10 percent of disposable earnings when weekly income is more than 40 times the reference wage but no more than 60 times; 15 percent when weekly income is more than 60 times but no more than 80 times; and 25 percent when weekly income exceeds 80 times the reference wage. There is no 5 percent tier anywhere in the enacted statute. Some press and advocacy summaries of the Debt Fairness Act describe the tiers as starting at 5 percent, but that figure existed only at an earlier bill stage and was not carried into the law that actually took effect; do not rely on it.
The reference wage itself is the greater of Minnesota's own indexed minimum hourly wage, which adjusts every January 1 and is capped at a 5 percent annual increase, or the federal minimum wage. Because Minnesota's minimum wage is higher than the federal $7.25 floor, the 40-times protected amount below which nothing can be garnished moves upward each year; check the current Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry figure before doing the math for a specific paycheck.
Minnesota has no separate head-of-household wage exemption; the tiered formula itself is the protection, and Minn. Stat. Section 550.37, subdivision 13 makes clear that exempt earnings are exempt as a matter of right, whether claimed or not, and cannot be waived.
Job protection in Minnesota goes well beyond the federal floor. Under Minn. Stat. Section 571.927, an employer cannot discharge or discipline an employee, or an independent contractor, as a result of an earnings garnishment, without any limit to a single debt the way federal law imposes. A worker who is wrongfully terminated can recover reinstatement, twice their lost earnings, and other relief, in a civil action brought within 90 days, and the right cannot be waived.
State tax wage levies follow the same protective formula as ordinary judgment garnishment; Minn. Stat. Section 270C.69 ties the amount an employer must withhold for a state tax levy directly to the Section 571.922 limits, rather than using a separate, harsher percentage.
The 2024 Debt Fairness Act also created a separate medical-debt chapter. Minn. Stat. Section 332C.03 prohibits a collecting party from reporting medical debt to a consumer reporting agency, and prohibits a consumer reporting agency from producing a consumer report containing an item it knows or should know concerns medical debt. Minn. Stat. Section 62J.807 bars a health care provider from denying medically necessary treatment or services to a patient, or to a member of the patient's family or household, because of current or previous outstanding medical debt owed to that provider, although the provider may condition care on enrolling in a reasonable payment plan that accounts for the patient's ability to pay. Section 332C.02 sets out the practices prohibited when anyone collects a medical debt, and Section 332C.05 supplies enforcement. The garnishment chapter itself, Section 571.922, contains no medical-debt-specific cap.
Bank Account Protections
Unlike wage garnishment, Minnesota's bank-account exemption is not automatic. Under Minn. Stat. Section 571.912, a debtor whose bank account is garnished must return a completed exemption-claim form, along with 60 days of bank statements, within 14 days, or the funds are released to the creditor by default. Once claimed, category protections apply: exempt earnings remain exempt for 20 days after deposit under Section 550.37, subdivision 13, and the earnings of a recipient of need-based government assistance remain exempt, including for 6 months after returning to work and 60 days after deposit, under subdivision 14. Minnesota's $1,500 wildcard exemption under Section 550.37, subdivision 28 is a bankruptcy-only protection and does not apply against an ordinary state-court bank garnishment.

Federal law adds an automatic layer for federal benefits specifically. Under 31 CFR Part 212, a bank that receives a garnishment order must review the account and protect an amount equal to the last two months of directly deposited Social Security, VA, and certain other federal benefit payments, without the account holder needing to claim an exemption first. That protection covers direct deposit only, not benefits later deposited by paper check.
Statute of Limitations on Debt in Minnesota
Minnesota sets a 6-year limitations period for contract debt under Minn. Stat. Section 541.05, subdivision 1(1), covering any contract or obligation, express or implied, where no other period is specifically prescribed. That same clause covers written contracts, oral contracts, and open accounts, so the written-versus-oral and credit-card classification questions that matter in other states are effectively moot in Minnesota.
Promissory notes follow the state's UCC Article 3 enactment, Minn. Stat. Section 336.3-118(a): 6 years from the due date for an ordinary note payable at a definite time; a demand note gets 6 years from demand, or is barred after 10 years of no payment with no demand made.
Minnesota requires a signed writing for most revivals. Under Minn. Stat. Section 541.17, an acknowledgment or new promise sufficient to revive a time-barred debt must be in a signed writing. The same section, though, states that this writing requirement does not alter the effect of a payment of principal or interest, preserving the traditional common-law rule that a payment can restart the clock. Exactly how Minnesota courts have applied that payment exception in practice was not independently confirmed this session, so treat a partial payment as a meaningful risk rather than a safe act.
Minnesota's conflict-of-laws statute, Section 541.31, generally applies another state's shorter limitations period to a claim substantively governed by that state's law, but lets a Minnesota resident plaintiff use Minnesota's own period even if the claim would be barred where it arose.
Two points hold regardless of classification. Time-barred debt is not erased debt: a collector can still ask you to pay, and it can remain on your credit report for up to 7 years under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, a separate clock. And suing or threatening to sue on a debt after the statute of limitations has run is a flat violation of federal Regulation F (12 CFR 1006.26).
What Debt Collectors Can and Cannot Do
Third-party collectors working Minnesota accounts answer to the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Regulation F. They cannot call before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. your local time, harass you, misrepresent the amount or legal status of a debt, or threaten to sue on a debt that is already time-barred. Within five days of first contacting you, a collector must send validation information. If you dispute the debt in writing within the 30-day period that validation notice opens, 15 U.S.C. Section 1692g(b) requires the collector to cease collection of the debt, or of the disputed portion, until it obtains verification of the debt or a copy of a judgment and mails that verification to you. Read that duty for what it is: a pause on collection activity, not a credit-reporting rule.
Minnesota does not stop at the federal floor. Minn. Stat. Sections 332.31 to 332.44 are the state's own debt-collection statute, and Section 332.37, headed PROHIBITED PRACTICES, binds any collection agency, debt buyer, or collector directly under state law. Among other things it forbids threatening wage garnishment or suit by a particular lawyer the collector has not actually retained, using sheriffs or other officers authorized to serve legal papers except when performing their legally authorized duties, furnishing legal advice or otherwise practicing law, publishing lists of debtors outside credit reporting or using shame cards and shame automobiles, and operating under a name implying the agency is a branch of or associated with a government department.
Debt buyers sit inside that scheme rather than outside it. Section 332.31, subdivision 3 defines a collection agency to include a debt buyer, and subdivision 8 defines a debt buyer as a business engaged in purchasing charged-off accounts or other indebtedness for collection purposes, so the company that bought your old account is licensed and regulated on the same terms as the agency that services it. Minnesota licenses and supervises those agencies through its Department of Commerce.
Car Repossession in Minnesota
Minnesota enacted the standard UCC self-help rule at Minn. Stat. Section 336.9-609: a secured party may take possession through judicial process, or without judicial process if it proceeds without a breach of the peace. Minnesota's statute does not define breach of the peace, leaving that content to case law that was not confirmed for this page.

Minnesota's statutory right to cure a default before repossession is limited to manufactured homes. Under Minn. Stat. Section 327.66, a debtor may cure within the 30-day period following the notices required by Section 327.64, by tendering the arrears plus enforcement costs capped at $100, which suspends the right to repossess. No equivalent notice-and-cure statute exists for ordinary motor vehicles; a self-help repossession of a car can generally proceed once the debtor is in default, subject only to the breach-of-the-peace limit.
Deficiency judgments after a repossession sale follow Minnesota's standard UCC Article 9 disposition rules, requiring a commercially reasonable sale before any remaining balance can be pursued, with a separate consumer-protective provision requiring the creditor to explain how a claimed deficiency was calculated on request.
Servicemembers get one further protection: for a vehicle financed before military service, the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 3952) requires a court order before repossession.
If You Are Being Garnished or Sued in Minnesota
Move in this order. First, if you are served with a lawsuit, file an answer before the deadline, even a bare general denial, because a default judgment forfeits every defense you had, including the statute of limitations. Second, if wage garnishment is already running, check the math against the tiered 10/15/25 percent formula and the 40x reference-wage floor, not any 5 percent figure you may have read elsewhere. Third, if your bank account is garnished, return the exemption-claim form and your bank statements within 14 days, because Minnesota's bank exemption is not automatic. Fourth, if the debt is old, raise the statute of limitations yourself, and be cautious about making a payment, since it may restart the clock. Finally, if the overall debt picture is unmanageable, bankruptcy's automatic stay stops most garnishments and collection lawsuits while the case is pending.
Overwhelmed by debt? Get a free bankruptcy consultation
Bankruptcy can stop foreclosure, wage garnishment, and creditor calls, and which debts you can clear and what property you keep depend on your state's exemptions. Get a free, confidential consultation with a bankruptcy attorney to understand your options. There is no obligation.
Information last verified on 2026-08-12. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.

Related Resources
- Debt Collection Laws by State
- Statute of Limitations on Debt
- How to Stop Wage Garnishment
- Car Repossession Laws
- Can Social Security Be Garnished?
- Minnesota Statute of Limitations
- Minnesota Bankruptcy
Last updated: 2026-08-12.
More Minnesota Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How much of my paycheck can be garnished in Minnesota?
Minnesota uses a tiered formula under the 2024 Debt Fairness Act: 10 percent of disposable earnings between 40 and 60 times the reference wage, 15 percent between 60 and 80 times, and 25 percent above 80 times, always capped at the amount above 40 times the reference wage. Below 40 times the reference wage, nothing can be garnished.
Does Minnesota garnishment really start at 5 percent?
No. That figure circulated from an earlier version of the bill and was not carried into the law Minnesota actually enacted. The current statute, Minn. Stat. Section 571.922, has three tiers: 10, 15, and 25 percent.
Is my bank account automatically protected in Minnesota?
No. Unlike wage garnishment, Minnesota's bank-account exemption requires action: you must return a completed exemption-claim form and 60 days of bank statements within 14 days of the garnishment, or the funds are released to the creditor.
Does Minnesota have its own debt collection law, or just the federal FDCPA?
Both. Minn. Stat. Sections 332.31 to 332.44 are Minnesota's own debt-collection statute, and Section 332.37, PROHIBITED PRACTICES, applies directly to any collection agency, debt buyer, or collector. Section 332.31, subdivisions 3 and 8 place debt buyers inside the same licensing scheme, so a company that bought your charged-off account is bound by the state rules as well as the FDCPA.
Can a collector report my medical debt to the credit bureaus in Minnesota?
No. Minn. Stat. Section 332C.03 prohibits a collecting party from reporting medical debt to a consumer reporting agency, and prohibits a consumer reporting agency from including medical debt in a consumer report. A separate provision, Minn. Stat. Section 62J.807, bars a provider from denying medically necessary care because of outstanding medical debt, though it may require a reasonable payment plan.
What happens if I dispute a debt in writing?
If you dispute the debt in writing within 30 days of the validation notice, 15 U.S.C. Section 1692g(b) requires the collector to stop collecting the debt, or the disputed portion, until it obtains verification or a copy of a judgment and mails it to you. That is a pause on collection, not a credit-reporting rule.
What is the statute of limitations on credit card debt in Minnesota?
Six years under Minn. Stat. Section 541.05, subdivision 1(1), the general period for contract, oral, and open-account claims.
Does making a payment restart the clock on old debt in Minnesota?
Minnesota generally requires a signed writing to revive a time-barred debt, but the statute preserves the traditional effect of an actual payment of principal or interest, so a payment may restart the clock. Treat a payment on old debt as a meaningful risk, not a safe move.
Can I be fired for a wage garnishment in Minnesota?
No. Minn. Stat. Section 571.927 bars discharging or disciplining an employee or independent contractor because of an earnings garnishment, without limiting the protection to a single debt, and a wrongfully terminated worker can recover up to twice their lost earnings.
Updates
Added Minnesota's own debt-collection statute (Minn. Stat. Sections 332.31 to 332.44, including the Section 332.37 prohibited practices and the debt-buyer licensing definitions), replaced the unconfirmed medical-debt hedge with the enacted citations (Sections 332C.02, 332C.03, 332C.05 and Section 62J.807), and corrected the written-dispute rule to state the 30-day window and the cease-collection duty under 15 U.S.C. Section 1692g(b).
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 571: GARNISHMENT
§ 571.922LIMITATION ON WAGE GARNISHMENTIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Unless the judgment is for child support, the maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any pay period subjected to garnishment may not exceed the lesser of: (1) 25 percent of the debtor's disposable earnings, if the debtor's weekly income exceeds 80 times the greater of the hourly wage described in paragraph (b); (2) 15 percent of the debtor's disposable earnings, if the debtor's weekly income exceeds 60 times, but is less than or equal to 80 times, the greater of the hourly wages described in paragraph (b); or (3) ten percent of the debtor's disposable earnings, if the debtor's weekly income exceeds 40 times, but is less than or equal to 60 times, the greater of the hourly wages described in paragraph (b). (b) The amount by which the debtor's disposable earnings exceed the greater of: (i) 40 times the hourly wage described in section 177.24, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (4); or (ii) 40 times the federal minimum hourly wages prescribed by section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, United States Code, title 29, section 206(a)(1).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Minn. Stat. 571.922 is applied as the measure of earnings exempt from garnishment. In re Seifert (2016) held farm proceeds are "earnings" under the section and applied its lesser-of comparison to fix the garnishable share. Marriage of LaFreniere-Nietz v. Nietz (1996) read it as a ceiling, not a bar to a court limiting garnishment further.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Wilson v. Commissioner of Revenue (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2003, 656 N.W.2d 547)“…approximately 25 percent of the wages owed to an employee. Minn.Stat. § 571.922(1) (1994). The notice advised HWC that…”
- Marriage of LaFreniere-Nietz v. Nietz (Court of Appeals of Minnesota 1996, 547 N.W.2d 895)✓A district court capped an ex-wife's collection of support arrears at $250 a month and barred further wage garnishment; the court held the statute's bar on orders violating this section only forbids garnishing more than the limit, leaving room for equitable restrictions.
- In re Seifert (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota 2016, 544 B.R. 670)✓A chapter 12 family farmer claimed crop-sale proceeds as exempt earnings; the bankruptcy court applied this section's lesser-of test, found the 25 percent prong smaller than the minimum-wage prong, and allowed his $91,258 exemption.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy in Minnesota (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
§ 571.912FORM OF NOTICE, INSTRUCTIONS, AND EXEMPTION NOTICEIn force
Subdivision 1. Form of notice. The notice, instructions, and exemption notice informing a debtor that a garnishment summons has been used to attach funds of the debtor to satisfy a claim must be a separate notice and must be substantially in the following form: State of Minnesota District Court County of: . Judicial District: . Court File Number: . Case Type: . Creditor's full name . Debtor's full name . Third Party (bank, employer, or other) . Important Notice Money in Your Account Has Been Frozen The Creditor has frozen money in your account at your bank. Your account balance is $....... The amount being held is $....... The amount being held is frozen for 14 days from the date of this notice. Some of your money in your account may be protected (the legal word is exempt). You may be able to get it sooner than 14 days if you act quickly and follow the instructions on the next page. The attached exemption form lists some different ways money in your account may be protected. If your money comes from a benefit on the list, put a check on the line next to it. The creditor can't take it.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Savig v. First National Bank of Omaha (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2010, 781 N.W.2d 335)“…based on Minn. Stat. § 524.6-203 (a). See Minn.Stat. § 571.912 (outlining what must be included in an…”
- Alex Sajady, et al., Appellants, vs. Tracy Sajady, Respondent (Court of Appeals of Minnesota 2025)“…btor has questions. Minn. Stat. § 571.72, subd. 8; see also Minn. Stat. § 571.912, subd. 1 (2024) (governing funds in fin…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 571.927PENALTY FOR RETALIATION FOR GARNISHMENTIn force
Subdivision 1. Prohibition. An employer shall not discharge or otherwise discipline an employee or independent contractor as a result of an earnings garnishment authorized by this chapter. Subd. 2. Remedy. If an employer violates this section, a court may order the reinstatement of an aggrieved party who demonstrates a violation of this section, and other relief the court considers appropriate. The aggrieved party may bring a civil action within 90 days of the date of the prohibited action. If an employer-employee or employer-independent contractor relationship existed before the violation of this section, the employee or independent contractor shall recover twice the earnings lost as a result of this violation. Subd. 3. Nonwaiver. The rights guaranteed by this section may not be waived or altered by contract.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2017
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Burt v. Rackner, Inc. (Supreme Court of Minnesota 2017, 902 N.W.2d 448)“…urt may order reinstatement and other appropriate relief); Minn. Stat. § 571.927 (2016) (providing that an “employer sh…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 270C: DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
§ 270C.69WITHHOLDING BY EMPLOYER OF DELINQUENT TAXESIn force
Subdivision 1. Notice and procedures. (a) The commissioner may, within five years after the date of assessment of the tax, or if a lien has been filed under section 270C.63, within the statutory period for enforcement of the lien, give notice to any employer deriving income which has a taxable situs in this state regardless of whether the income is exempt from taxation, that an employee of that employer is delinquent in a certain amount with respect to any taxes, including penalties, interest, and costs. The commissioner can proceed under this section only if the tax is uncontested or if the time for appeal of the tax has expired. The commissioner shall not proceed under this section until the expiration of 30 days after mailing to the taxpayer, at the taxpayer's last known address, a written notice of (1) the amount of taxes, interest, and penalties due from the taxpayer and demand for their payment, and (2) the commissioner's intention to require additional withholding by the taxpayer's employer pursuant to this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 550: EXECUTIONS, REDEMPTION, EXEMPTIONS
§ 550.37PROPERTY EXEMPTIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Subdivision 1. Exemption. The property mentioned in this section is not liable to attachment, garnishment, or sale on any final process, issued from any court. Subd. 2. Sacred possessions. The Bible, Torah, Qur'an, prayer rug, and other religious items in an aggregate amount not exceeding $2,000. Subd. 2a. Library. A personal library in an aggregate amount not exceeding $750. Subd. 2b. Musical instruments. Musical instruments in an aggregate amount not exceeding $2,000. Subd. 2c. Family pets. Family pets in an aggregate amount not exceeding $1,000. Subd. 3. Pew and burial lot. A seat or pew in any house or place of public worship and a lot in any burial ground. Subd. 4. Personal goods. (a) All wearing apparel, one watch, utensils, and foodstuffs of the debtor and the debtor's family. (b) Household furniture, household appliances, radios, computers, tablets, televisions, printers, cell phones, smart phones, and other consumer electronics of the debtor and the debtor's family, not exceeding $12,150 in value. (c) The debtor's aggregate interest, not exceeding $3,308 in value, in jewelry.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 134 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re Tveten (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1987, 402 N.W.2d 551)“…ons or societies such as Lutheran Brotherhood, exempt under Minn.Stat. §§ 550.37, subd. 11 (1986) or 64B.18 (1986)?…”
- ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. Kvamme (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1995, 529 N.W.2d 335)“…vamme claimed that all funds held by Dain were exempt under Minn.Stat. § 550.37, subd. 24, and identified the exempt am…”
- Medill v. State (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1991, 477 N.W.2d 703)“…s District Court for the District of Minnesota: Does Minn.Stat. § 550.37, subd. 22 (1990), which exempts “[rjigh…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 541: LIMITATION OF TIME, COMMENCING ACTIONS
§ 541.05VARIOUS CASES, SIX YEARSIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
Subdivision 1. Six-year limitation. Except where the Uniform Commercial Code otherwise prescribes, the following actions shall be commenced within six years: (1) upon a contract or other obligation, express or implied, as to which no other limitation is expressly prescribed; (2) upon a liability created by statute, other than those arising upon a penalty or forfeiture or where a shorter period is provided by section 541.07; (3) for a trespass upon real estate; (4) for taking, detaining, or injuring personal property, including actions for the specific recovery thereof; (5) for criminal conversation, or for any other injury to the person or rights of another, not arising on contract, and not hereinafter enumerated; (6) for relief on the ground of fraud, in which case the cause of action shall not be deemed to have accrued until the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts constituting the fraud; (7) against sureties upon the official bond of any public officer, whether of the state or of any county, town, school district, or a municipality therein; in which case the limitation shall not begin to run until the term of such officer for which the bond was given shall have…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 438 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co. (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1986, 383 N.W.2d 645)“…e trial court held the limitation provision was modified by Minn.Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1(1) (1984), which provides a 6-…”
- Toombs v. Daniels (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1985, 361 N.W.2d 801)“…5. The statute of limitations applicable to this action is Minn.Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1, sections (6) or (7), as follo…”
- Wegan v. Village of Lexington (Supreme Court of Minnesota 1981, 309 N.W.2d 273)“…ence, the six-year tort statute of limitations contained in Minn.Stat. § 541.05 (1980) is applicable. Additionally, no…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Minnesota Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Minnesota Car Accident Laws: No-Fault, PIP, and Your Claim, Minnesota Motorcycle Accident Laws (2026): Deadlines
§ 541.17NEW PROMISE MUST BE IN WRITINGIn force
No acknowledgment or promise shall be evidence of a new or continuing contract sufficient to take the case out of the operation of this chapter unless the same is contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby; but this section shall not alter the effect of a payment of principal or interest.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bethesda Lutheran Church v. Twin City Construction Co. (Court of Appeals of Minnesota 1984, 356 N.W.2d 344)“…e reliance, Twin City and Building Specialties contend that Minn.Stat. § 541.17 (1978) nullifies application of equitab…”
- In Re Estate of Fauskee (Court of Appeals of Minnesota 1993, 497 N.W.2d 324)“…hat such an agreement must be in writing to be enforceable. Minn.Stat. § 541.17 (1990) provides: No acknowledgme…”
- In re the Estate of Oria Albert Brinkmeier (Court of Appeals of Minnesota 2026)“…t was not reduced to writing, citing several statutes. See Minn. Stat. § 541.17 (2024); Minn. Stat. § 524.2-514 (2024)…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 336: UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
§ 336.3-118STATUTE OF LIMITATIONSIn force
(a) Except as provided in subsection (e), an action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay a note payable at a definite time must be commenced within six years after the due date or dates stated in the note or, if a due date is accelerated, within six years after the accelerated due date.(b) Except as provided in subsection (d) or (e), if demand for payment is made to the maker of a note payable on demand, an action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay the note must be commenced within six years after the demand.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
§ 336.9-609SECURED PARTY'S RIGHT TO TAKE POSSESSION AFTER DEFAULTIn force
(a) Possession; rendering equipment unusable; disposition on debtor's premises. After default, a secured party:(1) may take possession of the collateral; and(2) without removal, may render equipment unusable and dispose of collateral on a debtor's premises under section 336.9-610.(b) Judicial and nonjudicial process. A secured party may proceed under subsection (a):(1) pursuant to judicial process; or(2) without judicial process, if it proceeds without breach of the peace.(c) Assembly of collateral. If so agreed, and in any event after default, a secured party may require the debtor to assemble the collateral and make it available to the secured party at a place to be designated by the secured party which is reasonably convenient to both parties.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 327: HOTELS, MOTELS, RESORTS, AND MANUFACTURED HOMES
§ 327.66CURE OF DEFAULTIn force
A debtor, or an occupant of a manufactured home acting on behalf of a debtor, may within the 30-day period specified in the notices required by section 327.64, cure a default by tendering full payment of the sums then in arrears under the terms of the security agreement, or by otherwise remedying the default, and by paying the reasonable costs, not to exceed the sum of $100, incurred by the secured party to enforce the security agreement. Cure of a default in accordance with the provisions of this section shall suspend the secured party's right to seek repossession of the manufactured home under the provisions of sections 327.61 to 327.67.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at revisor.mn.gov
Code of Federal Regulations Title 12
§ 1006.26Collection of time-barred debts.In forcecited in 37 of our articles
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section: (1) Statute of limitations means the period prescribed by applicable law for bringing a legal action against the consumer to collect a debt. (2) Time-barred debt means a debt for which the applicable statute of limitations has expired. (b) Legal actions and threats of legal actions prohibited. A debt collector must not bring or threaten to bring a legal action against a consumer to collect a time-barred debt. This paragraph (b) does not apply to proofs of claim filed in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (2024) dismissed FDCPA claims built on 12 CFR 1006.26(b), reasoning it bars only collection of time-barred debts and the loans at issue were not time barred. Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (2025) dismissed a Regulation F claim because nonjudicial foreclosure is not covered by the FDCPA.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2024)✓A borrower claimed a servicer's letter and billing statement lacked language required by 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court granted the servicer summary judgment, since the rule only bars collecting time-barred debts and it had already found her HELOC and mortgage enforceable.
- Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2025)✓Pro se homeowners alleged a servicer and foreclosure attorneys pursued a time-barred, discharged second mortgage in violation of 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court dismissed that claim, holding parties carrying out a nonjudicial foreclosure are not FDCPA debt collectors.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Debt Collection Laws: Garnishment Limits, Debt Deadlines, and Repossession, Maine Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Michigan Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
United States Code Title 50
§ 3952Protection under installment contracts for purchase or leaseIn forcecited in 17 of our articles
After a servicemember enters military service, a contract by the servicemember for— the purchase of real or personal property (including a motor vehicle); or the lease or bailment of such property, may not be rescinded or terminated for a breach of terms of the contract occurring before or during that person’s military service, nor may the property be repossessed for such breach without a court order. This section applies only to a contract for which a deposit or installment has been paid by the servicemember before the servicemember enters military service. A person who knowingly resumes possession of property in violation of subsection (a), or in violation of section 3918 of this title, or who knowingly attempts to do so, shall be fined as provided in title 18, or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Ditech Holding Corporation (United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York 2025)“…d on, or sold during or within a year after active service. 50 U.S.C. §§ 3952, 3953. Claimant states that he re…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Alaska Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Louisiana Debt Collection Laws: Prescription, Garnishment, and Repossession
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Minn. Stat. Section 571.922, Limitation on Wage Garnishment(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. Section 571.912, Exemption Claim Notice and Procedure(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. Section 550.37, Property Exempt from Attachment(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. Section 571.927, Discharge for Garnishment Prohibited(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. Section 270C.69, State Tax Levy on Wages(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. Section 541.05, Six-Year Limitations for Contract Actions(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. Section 336.3-118, Statute of Limitations on Negotiable Instruments(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. Section 541.17, Acknowledgment Must Be in Writing(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. Section 336.9-609, Secured Party Right to Take Possession After Default(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. Section 327.66, Manufactured Home Right to Cure(revisor.mn.gov).gov
- 12 CFR 1006.26, Collection of Time-Barred Debt (Regulation F)(ecfr.gov).gov
- Minn. Stat. Section 332.37, Prohibited Practices (Collection Agencies, Debt Buyers, Collectors)(revisor.mn.gov)
- Minn. Stat. Section 332.31, Definitions (Collection Agency; Debt Buyer)(revisor.mn.gov)
- Minn. Stat. Section 332C.03, Medical Debt Reporting Prohibited(revisor.mn.gov)
- Minn. Stat. Section 332C.02, Prohibited Practices in Collecting Medical Debt(revisor.mn.gov)
- Minn. Stat. Section 62J.807, Denial of Health Treatment or Services Due to Outstanding Medical Debt(revisor.mn.gov)
- 15 U.S.C. Section 1692g, Validation of Debts (FDCPA)(law.cornell.edu)