Nebraska
Nebraska Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 23, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 23, 2026. · 10 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Nebraska imposes strict liability on dog owners for bite injuries under Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-601. Owners are responsible for all damages to any person lawfully present, regardless of whether the dog had bitten before or the owner knew the dog was dangerous.
Estimate your claim: Use our free Nebraska Dog Bite Settlement Calculator to see a rough settlement range based on the medical bills, the bite location, the victim's age, and Nebraska's liability rule.
Nebraska Dog Bite Liability Under Strict Liability
Nebraska holds dog owners strictly liable for bite injuries under Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-601. This means the owner is financially responsible for damages caused by their dog, even if the dog has never bitten anyone before and the owner had no reason to believe the dog was dangerous.

The statute makes owners liable for "any and all damages" to any person, other than a trespasser, by reason of having been bitten by the dog. It also covers damages caused by a dog "killing, wounding, injuring, worrying, or chasing any person or persons or any sheep or other domestic animals," so the statute reaches more than bites. A person who is knocked down, injured, or chased by a dog is within its terms.
This strict liability framework is significant because it removes two barriers that exist in some other states. Victims do not need to prove the owner was negligent in controlling the dog, and victims do not need to show the owner had prior knowledge of the dog's dangerous tendencies (sometimes called the "one-bite rule").
What a Victim Must Prove
To recover damages under Nebraska's strict liability statute, a dog bite victim only needs to establish three elements:
- The defendant owned the dog at the time of the incident.
- The dog bit the victim or caused injuries.
- The victim was lawfully present at the location where the bite occurred (not trespassing).
Playful or Mischievous Acts Excluded
Nebraska courts have interpreted the statute to exclude playful and mischievous acts by dogs. When the statutory language "killing, wounding, injuring, worrying, or chasing" is read together, it applies to aggressive or harmful behavior, not ordinary roughhousing or playful contact. If a dog knocks someone over while playing fetch, for example, that may not trigger strict liability under 54-601.
Legal Defenses Available to Dog Owners
Even under strict liability, Nebraska law provides several defenses that can reduce or eliminate a dog owner's financial responsibility.
Trespassing
The most clear-cut defense is trespassing. Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-601 explicitly exempts owners from strict liability for injuries to trespassers. However, this exemption only applies to the statutory strict liability claim. A trespasser may still pursue a common-law negligence claim if the owner acted recklessly or intentionally.
This defense may be weaker when applied to children, who may not fully understand property boundaries. Nebraska courts can consider the age and maturity of the victim when evaluating a trespassing defense.
Intentional Provocation
If the victim intentionally provoked the dog and that provocation caused the attack, the owner is not liable. The provocation must be deliberate and sufficient to cause a normally calm dog to bite. Examples include hitting, kicking, teasing, or tormenting the animal.
Accidental provocation, such as accidentally stepping on a dog's tail, generally does not qualify as a valid defense.
Comparative Negligence
Nebraska follows a modified comparative negligence rule under Neb. Rev. Stat. 25-21,185.09. Under this rule, a victim's compensation is reduced by their percentage of fault. If the victim is found to be 50% or more at fault for the incident, they are completely barred from recovery.
For example, if a jury awards $100,000 in damages but finds the victim was 30% at fault for approaching a chained dog despite warning signs, the victim would receive $70,000. But if the victim were found 50% or more at fault, they would receive nothing.
Assumption of Risk
Professionals who work with animals, such as veterinarians, groomers, and kennel workers, may face a reduced ability to recover if they voluntarily assumed the risk of being bitten as part of their occupation.
Government, Police, and Military Dog Use
Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-601(2) also exempts a governmental agency and its employees from liability when a dog is used in military or police work, if the agency was complying with a written policy on the necessary and appropriate use of the dog, and either the dog was responding to a harassing or provoking act, or the damage resulted from a reasonable use of force while the dog was assisting in an arrest, an investigation, the execution of a warrant, or the defense of an officer, and the injured person was a party to, a participant in, or reasonably suspected of being a party to or participant in the incident that prompted the dog's use. This exemption is narrower than trespassing or provocation and generally does not protect an agency from liability to an uninvolved bystander.
Damages Dog Bite Victims Can Recover
Nebraska dog bite victims may pursue both economic and non-economic damages. Because strict liability removes the need to prove fault, victims in Nebraska generally have a strong path to compensation.
Economic Damages
| Damage Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Medical expenses | Emergency room visits, surgery, hospitalization, rehabilitation, prescription medication |
| Future medical costs | Reconstructive surgery, physical therapy, counseling |
| Lost wages | Time missed from work during recovery |
| Lost earning capacity | Reduced ability to work due to permanent injury |
| Property damage | Damaged clothing, broken personal items |
Non-Economic Damages
- Pain and suffering from the bite and medical treatment
- Emotional distress and psychological trauma, including PTSD or anxiety around dogs
- Scarring and disfigurement, particularly for facial injuries
- Loss of enjoyment of life and daily activities
Nebraska does not impose a statutory cap on damages in most dog bite cases, so compensation is determined by the specific facts and severity of each case.
Statute of Limitations for Dog Bite Claims
Under Neb. Rev. Stat. 25-207, Nebraska's statute of limitations for personal injury claims, including dog bites, is four years from the date of the injury. If you do not file a lawsuit within this four-year window, you will almost certainly lose the right to pursue your claim.
Important timing considerations:
- The clock starts on the date the bite occurs, not when symptoms or complications develop.
- Minors generally have an extended deadline. The statute of limitations may be tolled (paused) until the child reaches the age of majority.
- Claims against government entities, such as a dog owned by a city employee on duty, may have shorter notice requirements, sometimes as little as one year.
- Missing the deadline is an absolute bar to recovery in nearly all circumstances.
Dangerous Dog Laws in Nebraska
Nebraska has a comprehensive dangerous dog framework under Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-617 through 54-624. These statutes define dangerous dogs, impose requirements on their owners, and establish criminal penalties for violations.
Definition of a Dangerous Dog
Under Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-617, a dog is classified as "dangerous" if, according to the records of an animal control authority, it has:
- Killed a human being
- Inflicted injury on a human being that required medical treatment
- Killed a domestic animal without provocation
- Been previously determined to be "potentially dangerous," and the owner received notice of that determination, and the dog subsequently inflicted injury
The exclusions in 54-617(3)(b) are prong-specific rather than general. The exclusion for a person who was tormenting, abusing, or assaulting the dog applies only to the second category above, an injury to a human being requiring medical treatment. The exclusion for a person who was committing a willful trespass or another tort on the owner's property, tormenting or provoking the dog, or committing or attempting to commit a crime applies only to the fourth category, a dog previously determined to be potentially dangerous. A dog that has killed a human being, or killed a domestic animal without provocation, is not removed from the definition by the victim's trespass or crime. A police animal as defined in Neb. Rev. Stat. 28-1008 is also excluded from the dangerous dog definition.
Owner Requirements for Dangerous Dogs
Once a dog is designated as dangerous, the owner must comply with several mandatory requirements under Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-618 and 54-619:
- Spay or neuter the dog within 30 days of the dangerous dog declaration
- Microchip the dog within 30 days, with the identification number provided to animal control
- Secure confinement when unattended on the owner's property, in a locked pen or structure with secure sides, a secure top, and sides embedded at least one foot into the ground if there is no secured bottom (Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-619)
- Restrain the dog when not in a secure enclosure on the property
- Post warning signs notifying the public that a dangerous dog is present
Confiscation and Destruction
Under Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-620, any dangerous dog may be immediately confiscated by an animal control officer if the owner violates sections 54-617 through 54-624. The owner is responsible for all reasonable costs of care or destruction. A court may also order the disposal of a dangerous dog in an expeditious and humane manner under Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-621.
Criminal Penalties for Dog Owners
Nebraska imposes criminal penalties on owners of dangerous dogs who violate the law. The severity of the charge depends on the circumstances.
| Violation | Charge | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| General violation of dangerous dog statutes (54-617 to 54-621) | Class IV misdemeanor | Fine up to $500 |
| Dangerous dog of owner with prior conviction attacks or bites a human or domestic animal | Class IIIA misdemeanor | Up to 7 days jail, $500 fine, or both |
| Dangerous dog inflicts serious bodily injury on a human (first offense) | Class I misdemeanor | Up to 1 year in jail, $1,000 fine, or both |
| Dangerous dog inflicts serious bodily injury on a human (second or subsequent offense) | Class IV felony | Up to 2 years in prison plus up to 12 months post-release supervision, or a $10,000 fine, or both |
Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-622.01 sets the serious bodily injury penalties in the table above, and it gives the owner a defense if the dangerous dog was in the custody of or under the direct control of someone other than the owner or a member of the owner's immediate family when the injury occurred. That section does not order the dog destroyed.
Mandatory destruction comes from a narrower provision. Under Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-623, if a dangerous dog belonging to an owner who already has a prior conviction under sections 54-617 to 54-624 attacks or bites a human being or a domestic animal, the dog "shall be immediately confiscated by an animal control authority, placed in quarantine for the proper length of time, and thereafter destroyed in an expeditious and humane manner." Without that prior conviction, destruction is not automatic, and confiscation under 54-620 is discretionary.
Dog Owner Responsibilities
Beyond the dangerous dog statutes, all Nebraska dog owners have general legal obligations.
Rabies Vaccination
Under Neb. Rev. Stat. 71-4401 through 71-4412, all dogs in Nebraska must be vaccinated against rabies by a licensed veterinarian. The veterinarian must issue a certificate of rabies vaccination that includes the dog's breed, sex, age, name, and distinctive markings, along with a vaccination tag.
Unvaccinated dogs acquired or moved into Nebraska must be vaccinated within 30 days of purchase or arrival, unless the dog is under the minimum age for initial vaccination.
Local Leash and Licensing Laws
Nebraska has no general statewide leash law, but it does have a state running-at-large prohibition that reaches its most populated areas. Under Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-608, in counties having a population of 80,000 or more inhabitants, and in cities of the first class contained in such counties, it is unlawful for a person or business to allow a dog it owns, keeps, harbors, or controls to be at large. Douglas, Lancaster, and Sarpy counties are all above that population threshold, so the state prohibition applies in the Omaha, Lincoln, and Bellevue areas in addition to any local ordinance.
Beyond that provision, many Nebraska municipalities have their own leash laws, licensing requirements, and animal control ordinances. Cities including Omaha and Lincoln require dogs to be leashed in public areas and licensed with local authorities. Violating a state or local requirement can strengthen a victim's case and may result in additional fines.
Landlord Liability for Dog Bites
Under Nebraska law, the strict liability of Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-601 applies to dog owners, not landlords. In McCullough v. Bozarth, 232 Neb. 714 (1989), the Nebraska Supreme Court established that landlords are not automatically subject to strict liability for bites by a tenant's dog.
However, landlords can still be held liable under a common-law negligence theory if:
- The landlord had actual knowledge that the tenant's dog was dangerous or had violent tendencies
- The landlord had the ability to remove the dog or require its removal (such as through lease terms)
- The landlord failed to take reasonable action to protect others despite knowing of the danger
Mere knowledge that a tenant owns a dog, or that a dog barks frequently, is generally not enough to establish landlord liability. The landlord must have known the specific dog posed a genuine risk of harm.
Landlords should consider including pet policies in lease agreements, requiring tenants to carry renter's insurance with liability coverage, and taking action promptly if they learn a tenant's dog has bitten someone or shown aggressive behavior.
Breed-Specific Legislation in Nebraska
Nebraska does not have a statewide breed-specific law, but several cities and municipalities have enacted their own breed-specific ordinances.
Omaha has regulations that apply to dogs displaying a majority of physical characteristics of pit bull terriers and related breeds. Owners in Omaha must leash, harness, and muzzle these dogs whenever outside, unless in a securely fenced yard. Licensing requires the owner to be at least 19 years old and carry proof of $100,000 in liability coverage. Dogs can earn a muzzle exemption through "Breed Ambassador Status" by passing the Canine Good Citizenship Test and completing a responsible pet ownership course.
Other Nebraska cities with breed-specific ordinances include Albion, Auburn, Battle Creek, Beatrice, and Holdrege, among others. Some cities ban certain breeds entirely, while others impose additional registration or confinement requirements.
The trend in recent years has been a gradual move away from breed-specific bans toward behavior-based dangerous dog laws. Check your local city or county ordinances for the specific rules that apply in your area.
How to File a Dog Bite Claim in Nebraska
If you have been bitten by a dog in Nebraska, taking the right steps early can protect your legal rights and strengthen your case.
- Get medical treatment immediately. Even minor bites can lead to infection. Keep all medical records, receipts, and documentation of treatment.
- Report the incident. File a report with your local animal control authority and police department. This creates an official record of the attack.
- Document everything. Photograph your injuries at multiple stages of healing, the location of the attack, and the dog if possible.
- Identify the dog and owner. Get the owner's name, address, phone number, and homeowner's or renter's insurance information.
- Collect witness information. If anyone saw the attack, get their names and contact details.
- Preserve physical evidence. Keep torn or bloodied clothing and any other items damaged during the attack.
- Consult a personal injury attorney. A lawyer experienced in Nebraska dog bite cases can evaluate whether you have a strong strict liability claim, identify all potentially liable parties, and handle negotiations with insurance companies. Many dog bite attorneys offer free consultations and work on a contingency fee basis.
Remember, you have four years from the date of the bite to file a lawsuit, but starting the process early preserves evidence and strengthens your position.
More Nebraska Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Nebraska a strict liability state for dog bites?
Yes. Under Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-601, Nebraska holds dog owners strictly liable for bite injuries to anyone who is lawfully present (not trespassing). The victim does not need to prove the owner knew the dog was dangerous or that the owner was negligent.
How long do I have to file a dog bite lawsuit in Nebraska?
You have four years from the date of the bite to file a personal injury lawsuit under Neb. Rev. Stat. 25-207. Minors may have extended deadlines, and claims against government entities may have shorter notice requirements.
What defenses can a dog owner use in Nebraska?
The primary defenses are trespassing (the victim was unlawfully on the property), intentional provocation (the victim deliberately provoked the dog), comparative negligence (the victim was 50% or more at fault), and assumption of risk (the victim knowingly accepted the risk, such as a veterinarian or groomer).
What happens if a dog is declared dangerous in Nebraska?
Under Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-618 and 54-619, the owner must spay or neuter the dog, microchip it, confine it in a secure enclosure with specific construction requirements, and post warning signs on the property. Violations can result in confiscation of the dog and criminal charges.
Can a landlord be held liable for a tenant's dog bite in Nebraska?
Generally, landlords are not subject to strict liability for a tenant's dog bite. However, a landlord can be held liable under common-law negligence if they had actual knowledge the tenant's dog was dangerous and failed to take reasonable action, such as requiring removal of the dog under the lease terms.
Injured in Nebraska? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Nebraska personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Corrected the Nebraska dangerous dog and strict liability sections: mandatory confiscation, quarantine, and destruction is set by Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-623 and applies only where the owner has a prior conviction, not by 54-622.01; restored the full text of 54-601 covering injury to any person as well as domestic animals; limited the dangerous dog exclusions to the specific prongs they apply to; and added the state running-at-large prohibition in 54-608.
Corrected the Class IV felony maximum from a stale 5-year figure to the current 2-year cap plus 12 months of post-release supervision (in effect since 2015); fixed a citation link that pointed to the wrong statute section; corrected an inconsistent comparative-negligence citation label; and added the statute's police/military-dog-use exemption that the article had omitted.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Nebraska Revised Statutes, Chapter 54: LIVESTOCK
§ 54-601Dogs; personal property; owner liable for damages; exceptionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Dogs are hereby declared to be personal property for all intents and purposes, and, except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, the owner or owners of any dog or dogs shall be liable for any and all damages that may accrue (a) to any person, other than a trespasser, by reason of having been bitten by any such dog or dogs and (b) to any person, firm, or corporation by reason of such dog or dogs killing, wounding, injuring, worrying, or chasing any person or persons or any sheep or other domestic animals belonging to such person, firm, or corporation. Such damage may be recovered in any court having jurisdiction of the amount claimed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Nebraska courts read section 54-601 as a strict liability statute with limits. Guzman v. Barth (1996) held it removed the common law scienter requirement for nontrespassers but did not abrogate a trespasser's common law claim, and Underhill v. Hobelman (2009) held the added word injuring did not extend it to a dog's playful acts.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Ruisi (Nebraska Court of Appeals 2000, 9 Neb. Ct. App. 435)✓A guest was mauled by one of the defendant's guard dogs and he was convicted under an Omaha ordinance for harboring a dangerous dog; the court did not apply section 54-601 itself but looked to its strict liability case law as instructive that prior knowledge is not required.
- Guzman v. Barth (Nebraska Supreme Court 1996, 250 Neb. 763)✓A stranded motorist walking to a house for help was bitten by a dog that came through an open gate; the court held section 54-601 does not abrogate the common law action, so even a trespasser may sue by proving the owner knew of the dog's vicious propensities.
- Underhill v. Hobelman (Nebraska Supreme Court 2009, 279 Neb. 30)✓A dog ran into a woman's knee and knocked her down; the court held that adding the word "injuring" to section 54-601 in 1992 did not extend strict liability to a dog's playful or mischievous acts, and it affirmed partial summary judgment for the owner.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Dog Bite Laws by State: Liability and Victim Rights
§ 54-617Dangerous dogs; terms, definedIn force
For purposes of sections 54-617 to 54-624: (1) Animal control authority means an entity authorized to enforce the animal control laws of a county, city, or village or this state and includes any local law enforcement agency or other agency designated by a county, city, or village to enforce the animal control laws of such county, city, or village; (2) Animal control officer means any individual employed, appointed, or authorized by an animal control authority for the purpose of aiding in the enforcement of sections 54-617 to 54-624 or any other law or ordinance relating to the licensure of animals, control of animals, or seizure and impoundment of animals and includes any state or local law enforcement officer or other employee whose duties in whole or in part include assignments that involve the seizure and impoundment of any animal; (3)(a) Dangerous dog means a dog that, according to the records of an animal control authority: (i) Has killed a human being; (ii) has inflicted injury on a human being that requires medical treatment; (iii) has killed a domestic animal without provocation; or (iv) has been previously determined to be a potentially dangerous dog by an animal…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2005
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. LESOING-DITTOE (Nebraska Supreme Court 2005, 269 Neb. 317)“…had been declared a potentially dangerous dog pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 54-617 (6) (Reissue 2004). A complaint was fil…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 54-618Dangerous dogs; actions required; costs; limitations on transport; permanent relocation; procedureIn force
(1) A dangerous dog that has been declared as such shall be spayed or neutered and implanted with a microchip identification number by a licensed veterinarian within thirty days after such declaration. The cost of both procedures is the responsibility of the owner of the dangerous dog. Written proof of both procedures and the microchip identification number shall be provided to the animal control authority after the procedures are completed. (2) No owner of a dangerous dog shall permit the dog to go beyond the property of the owner unless the dog is restrained securely by a chain or leash. (3) Except as provided in subsection (4) of this section or for a reasonable veterinary purpose, no owner of a dangerous dog shall transport such dog or permit such dog to be transported to another county, city, or village in this state.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
§ 54-619Dangerous dogs; confinement required; warning signsIn force
(1) No person, firm, partnership, limited liability company, or corporation shall own, keep, or harbor or allow to be in or on any premises occupied by him, her, or it or under his, her, or its charge or control any dangerous dog without such dog being confined so as to protect the public from injury. (2) While unattended on the owner's property, a dangerous dog shall be securely confined, in a humane manner, indoors or in a securely enclosed and locked pen or structure suitably designed to prevent the entry of young children and to prevent the dog from escaping. The pen or structure shall have secure sides and a secure top. If the pen or structure has no bottom secured to the sides, the sides shall be embedded into the ground at a depth of at least one foot. The pen or structure shall also protect the dog from the elements. The pen or structure shall be at least ten feet from any property line of the owner. The owner of a dangerous dog shall post warning signs on the property where the dog is kept that are clearly visible from all areas of public access and that inform persons that a dangerous dog is on the property.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
§ 54-622.01Dangerous dogs; serious bodily injury; penalty; defenseIn force
(1) Any owner whose dangerous dog inflicts on a human being a serious bodily injury as defined in section 28-109 is guilty of a Class I misdemeanor for the first offense and a Class IV felony for a second or subsequent offense, whether or not the same dangerous dog is involved. (2) It is a defense to a violation of subsection (1) of this section that the dangerous dog was, at the time of the infliction of the serious bodily injury, in the custody of or under the direct control of a person other than the owner or the owner's immediate family.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Nebraska Revised Statutes, Chapter 25: COURTS; CIVIL PROCEDURE
§ 25-207Actions for trespass, conversion, other torts, and frauds; exceptionsIn forcecited in 6 of our articles
The following actions can only be brought within four years: (1) An action for trespass upon real property; (2) an action for taking, detaining or injuring personal property, including actions for the specific recovery of personal property; (3) an action for an injury to the rights of the plaintiff, not arising on contract, and not hereinafter enumerated; and (4) an action for relief on the ground of fraud, but the cause of action in such case shall not be deemed to have accrued until the discovery of the fraud, except as provided in sections 30-2206 and 76-288 to 76-298.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Cited in 182 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Manker v. Manker (Nebraska Supreme Court 2002, 263 Neb. 944)“…tems, stocks, bonds, mutual fund shares, and bank accounts. Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-207 (Reissue 1995) is the applicable statut…”
- Murphy v. Spelts-Schultz Lumber Co. (Nebraska Supreme Court 1992, 240 Neb. 275)“…ce Actions. As a general statute of limitations, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-207 (Reissue 1989) requires that an action…”
- Chafin v. Wis. Province of the Soc'y of Jesus (Nebraska Supreme Court 2018, 301 Neb. 94)“…n's claims are barred by a 4-year statute of limitations. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-207 (3) (Reissue 2016) sets forth a 4-year…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Nebraska Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim, Motorcycle Accident Laws in Nebraska (2026): Deadlines, Nebraska Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability
§ 25-21,185.09Civil actions to which contributory negligence is a defense; effect on recoveryIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
Any contributory negligence chargeable to the claimant shall diminish proportionately the amount awarded as damages for an injury attributable to the claimant's contributory negligence but shall not bar recovery, except that if the contributory negligence of the claimant is equal to or greater than the total negligence of all persons against whom recovery is sought, the claimant shall be totally barred from recovery. The jury shall be instructed on the effects of the allocation of negligence.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-10 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Also relied on in: Medical Malpractice Laws in Nebraska (2026): Deadlines & Caps, Truck Accident Laws in Nebraska (2026): Deadlines & Liability, Nebraska Wrongful Death Laws (2026): Deadlines
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-601 - Dogs; personal property; owner liable for damages; exceptions(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 25-207 - Four-year statute of limitations for personal injury(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 25-21,185.09 - Comparative negligence; modified (50% bar)(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-617 - Dangerous dogs; terms, defined(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-618 - Dangerous dogs; actions required; costs(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-619 - Dangerous dogs; confinement required; warning signs(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-617 through 54-624 - Dangerous dog statutes (full text)(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-622.01 - Dangerous dogs; serious bodily injury; criminal penalties(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 71-4401 through 71-4412 - Rabies vaccination requirements(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 28-105 and 28-106 - Classification of felony and misdemeanor penalties(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-623 - Dangerous dogs; prior conviction; attack or bite; confiscation, quarantine, and destruction(nebraskalegislature.gov)
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-620 - Dangerous dogs; confiscation; when; costs(nebraskalegislature.gov)
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 54-608 - Dogs running at large prohibited in counties of 80,000 or more(nebraskalegislature.gov)