Louisiana
Louisiana Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 23, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 23, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Under Louisiana Civil Code Article 2321, dog owners face strict liability for bite injuries without requiring proof that the owner knew the dog was dangerous. A victim must show the dog posed an unreasonable risk of harm, the owner could have prevented the injury, and the victim did not provoke the dog.
Estimate your claim: Use our free Louisiana Dog Bite Settlement Calculator to see a rough settlement range based on the medical bills, the bite location, the victim's age, and Louisiana's liability rule.
How Louisiana Dog Bite Liability Works
Louisiana holds dog owners strictly liable for bite injuries under Civil Code Article 2321. Unlike states that follow a "one-bite rule," Louisiana does not require the victim to prove the owner knew the dog was dangerous. The owner is responsible regardless of the dog's prior behavior.

The statute draws a clear distinction between dogs and other animals. For general animals such as livestock, owners face liability only if they knew or should have known the animal would cause harm. For dogs, the standard is stricter.
The Three Elements a Victim Must Prove
To win a dog bite claim under Article 2321, the victim must establish three things:
- The defendant's dog caused the injury. The victim must show the dog belonged to the defendant and that the dog inflicted the harm.
- The owner could have prevented the injury. Courts interpret this to mean the dog presented an "unreasonable risk of harm." The risk of injury must outweigh the dog's utility.
- The victim did not provoke the dog. Provocation by the injured person is a complete defense under the statute.
The victim does not need to prove the owner was negligent, that the dog had bitten before, or that the dog had shown prior aggressive behavior.
Statute of Limitations for Dog Bite Claims
Louisiana changed its prescriptive period (the state's term for statute of limitations) for personal injury claims through Act 423 of 2024. The new law enacted Civil Code Article 3493.1, replacing the former one-year deadline with a two-year prescriptive period for delictual actions.
Which Deadline Applies
| When the Bite Occurred | Filing Deadline |
|---|---|
| Before July 1, 2024 | One year from the date of injury |
| On or after July 1, 2024 | Two years from the date of injury |
Act 423 applies only prospectively. If the bite happened before July 1, 2024, the old one-year deadline still applies. The clock starts running on the date of the bite.
Special rules may extend the deadline in limited situations. Minors generally have additional time. Claims against government entities may require shorter notice periods. Missing the deadline permanently bars the claim.
Louisiana's Comparative Fault System
Louisiana applies comparative fault principles under Civil Code Article 2323 to dog bite cases. If the victim's own negligence contributed to the injury, the court reduces the damages proportionally.
The 2026 Change to Modified Comparative Fault
Effective January 1, 2026, Acts 2025, No. 15 amended Civil Code Article 2323 and ended Louisiana's pure comparative fault system. Article 2323 now provides that a person whose share of fault is equal to or greater than fifty-one percent is not entitled to recover damages. Under this modified comparative fault rule:
- A victim who is 51% or more at fault for their own injury recovers nothing.
- A victim who is less than 51% at fault has their damages reduced by their percentage of fault.
This is a significant change. Under the old pure comparative fault system, a victim who was 90% at fault could still recover 10% of damages. That is no longer possible for incidents occurring on or after January 1, 2026.
For dog bite cases, this means courts will closely examine whether the victim's conduct contributed to the attack. Actions like ignoring warning signs, approaching an unfamiliar dog without the owner's permission, or failing to supervise children around dogs could reduce or eliminate recovery.
Legal Defenses for Dog Owners
Even under strict liability, Louisiana law provides several defenses for dog owners.
Provocation
Provocation is the only defense written directly into Article 2321. If the victim teased, tormented, hit, or otherwise provoked the dog into biting, the owner is not liable. The provocation must be sufficient to cause a normally calm dog to react aggressively.
Comparative Fault
Under Article 2323, the court assigns a percentage of fault to each party. If the victim's own careless behavior contributed to the bite, their damages are reduced accordingly. Under the modified system effective January 1, 2026, a victim found 51% or more at fault recovers nothing.
Trespassing
Dog owners generally face reduced or no liability when the bite victim was trespassing on the owner's property. Courts consider whether the victim had a legal right to be where the bite occurred. This defense may be weaker when the trespasser is a child too young to understand property boundaries.
Assumption of Risk
If the victim knowingly accepted the risk of a dog bite, recovery may be limited. This defense most commonly applies to veterinarians, dog groomers, kennel workers, and others who handle dogs professionally.
Dangerous and Vicious Dog Designations
Louisiana law creates two tiers of designation for dogs that have harmed people or other animals.
Dangerous Dogs (RS 14:102.14)
A dog qualifies as dangerous under RS 14:102.14 if it meets any of these criteria when unprovoked:
- Engaged in behavior requiring a person to take defensive action to avoid injury on two occasions within 36 months (while off the owner's property)
- Bit a person and caused an injury
- Killed, seriously bit, or otherwise injured a domestic animal on two occasions within 36 months (while off the owner's property)
Owners of dangerous dogs must keep the dog indoors or in a secure enclosure while on their property. Off the property, the dog must be restrained by a leash that prevents escape or access to other people. Violating these requirements is punishable by a fine of up to $300.
Vicious Dogs (RS 14:102.15)
A dog is classified as vicious under RS 14:102.15 if it was previously designated as dangerous and then, when unprovoked, inflicted serious bodily injury on or killed a person.
Owning a vicious dog is unlawful in Louisiana. Penalties include a fine of up to $500, imprisonment for up to six months, or both. Euthanasia is governed by a separate statute: under RS 14:102.16, a dog the court determines to be vicious must be humanely euthanized, and a dog determined to be dangerous may be humanely euthanized if it poses an immediate threat to public health and safety.
The Designation Hearing Process (RS 14:102.13)
The district attorney, sheriff, or animal control officer can file a petition in district court to have a dog declared dangerous or vicious under RS 14:102.13. The process works as follows:
- A petition is filed in district court.
- The judge issues a show-cause order to the dog's owner.
- A hearing is scheduled within five days of the order, including weekends and holidays.
- The hearing takes priority over all other cases on the docket.
- The owner may appeal the ruling within five calendar days.
A dog cannot be declared dangerous or vicious if evidence shows the victim was committing a crime on the owner's property, was teasing or abusing the dog, or if the dog was defending a person from an unjustified attack.
Dog Owner Responsibilities
Louisiana law and local ordinances impose several obligations on dog owners.
Rabies Vaccination
Under the Louisiana Sanitary Code, every dog over three months of age must be vaccinated against rabies by a licensed veterinarian. The initial series requires two vaccinations: the first at three months of age and the second one year later. Subsequent booster intervals follow the national Compendium of Animal Rabies Prevention and Control.
Licensing
Under RS 3:2772, parishes and municipalities that levy license fees must issue a metallic tag showing the license number, issuing body, and calendar year. The tag must be fastened to the dog's collar.
Local Leash and Confinement Laws
Many Louisiana municipalities enforce leash laws in public areas. While there is no statewide leash law for all dogs, owners of designated dangerous dogs face mandatory leash and confinement requirements under RS 14:102.14. Check your local parish or city ordinances for specific rules.
Victim Rights and Damages
Dog bite victims in Louisiana can recover both economic and non-economic damages.
Economic Damages
- Medical expenses, including emergency care, surgery, and rehabilitation
- Future medical costs for ongoing treatment or reconstructive procedures
- Lost wages and loss of future earning capacity
- Property damage, such as torn clothing or broken personal items
Non-Economic Damages
- Physical pain and suffering
- Emotional distress and psychological trauma
- Scarring and permanent disfigurement
- Loss of enjoyment of life
Louisiana does not cap damages in most personal injury cases, including dog bite claims. The full amount of proven damages is available to the victim, reduced only by their percentage of comparative fault.
Landlord Liability for Tenant Dog Bites
A landlord may face liability for a tenant's dog bite under Civil Code Article 2317.1, which addresses premises liability. However, landlord liability is more limited than owner liability.
A landlord may be held responsible if:
- The landlord had actual knowledge that the tenant's dog was dangerous
- The landlord had the authority to require the dog's removal
- The landlord failed to take reasonable steps to protect others
The tenant who owns the dog remains primarily liable under Article 2321. Landlords should include pet policies in lease agreements and consider requiring tenants to carry renter's insurance with liability coverage.
Criminal Penalties for Dog Owners
Beyond civil liability, Louisiana imposes criminal penalties on owners of dangerous and vicious dogs.
| Violation | Penalty |
|---|---|
| Unlawful ownership of a dangerous dog (RS 14:102.14) | Fine up to $300 |
| Unlawful ownership of a vicious dog (RS 14:102.15) | Fine up to $500, imprisonment up to 6 months, or both |
Additional criminal charges may apply when an owner intentionally uses a dog as a weapon or knowingly allows a dangerous dog to roam free and cause serious injury or death.
How to File a Dog Bite Claim in Louisiana
If a dog bites you in Louisiana, take these steps to protect your legal rights:
- Get medical treatment immediately. Even minor bites can cause infection. Keep all medical records and receipts.
- Report the bite. Contact local animal control and file a police report. This creates an official record of the incident.
- Document everything. Photograph your injuries, the location, and the dog if possible. Take photos over the following days as bruising and swelling develop.
- Identify the dog and owner. Get the owner's name, address, phone number, and homeowner's insurance information.
- Collect witness information. Get names and contact details from anyone who saw the attack.
- Preserve physical evidence. Keep torn or bloody clothing in a sealed bag.
- Do not give recorded statements to the dog owner's insurance company without legal advice.
- File your claim within the deadline. Remember: two years for bites occurring on or after July 1, 2024. One year for bites before that date.
Breed-Specific Legislation in Louisiana
Some Louisiana municipalities have enacted breed-specific legislation (BSL) targeting certain breeds, most commonly pit bulls. However, the trend in Louisiana has moved away from breed-specific bans toward behavior-based dangerous dog ordinances.
Local rules vary by parish and city. Check your specific municipality's ordinances for any breed restrictions or requirements in your area.
More Louisiana Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Louisiana a strict liability state for dog bites?
Yes. Under Civil Code Article 2321, dog owners are strictly liable for injuries caused by their dogs. The victim does not need to prove the owner knew the dog was dangerous. However, the victim must show the dog posed an unreasonable risk of harm and the owner could have prevented the injury.
How long do I have to file a dog bite lawsuit in Louisiana?
For bites occurring on or after July 1, 2024, you have two years from the date of the bite under Act 423 of 2024. For bites before that date, the deadline is one year. Missing the deadline permanently bars your claim.
What happens if I was partly at fault for the dog bite?
Louisiana applies comparative fault under Civil Code Article 2323. As of January 1, 2026, if you are found 51% or more at fault, you recover nothing. If you are less than 51% at fault, your damages are reduced by your percentage of fault.
What is the difference between a dangerous dog and a vicious dog in Louisiana?
A dangerous dog has bitten a person, or twice required defensive action or injured domestic animals within 36 months (RS 14:102.14). A vicious dog was previously designated dangerous and then inflicted serious bodily injury or killed a person (RS 14:102.15). Owning a vicious dog is a criminal offense punishable by fines and imprisonment.
Can a landlord be held liable for a tenant's dog bite in Louisiana?
A landlord may be liable under premises liability (Civil Code Article 2317.1) if the landlord knew the tenant's dog was dangerous, had authority to require the dog's removal, and failed to act. The dog's owner remains primarily liable under Article 2321.
Injured in Louisiana? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Louisiana personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Corrected the prescription article to Civil Code Article 3493.1, attributed the vicious-dog euthanasia rule to R.S. 14:102.16 instead of 14:102.15, tied the 2026 comparative-fault bar to Acts 2025, No. 15 amending Article 2323, and replaced law-firm and library links with the official Louisiana statute text.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Louisiana Civil Code
§ 2321Damage caused by animals; livestockIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
A. The owner of an animal, including livestock, is answerable for the damage caused by the animal. However, the owner is answerable for the damage only upon a showing that the owner knew or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known that his animal's behavior would cause damage, that the damage could have been prevented by the exercise of reasonable care, and that the owner failed to exercise such reasonable care. B. Nonetheless, the owner of a dog is strictly liable for damages for injuries to persons or property caused by the dog and which the owner could have prevented and which did not result from the injured person's provocation of the dog. C. The owner of livestock is liable for damages for injuries to persons or property caused by the livestock that escape an enclosure and the owner could have prevented by an exercise of reasonable care. The owner of livestock is not liable for damages for injuries to person or property for livestock that escape an enclosure due to any of the following: (1) A fortuitous event. (2) No fault of the owner. (3) Third person provocation of the livestock. D.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 23 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):In Pepper v. Triplet (2004) the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a plaintiff suing a dog owner under art. 2321 must show the dog presented an unreasonable risk of harm to establish the owner could have prevented the injury. Granger v. Guillory (2002) applied the article's res ipsa loquitur clause to horses that escaped onto a highway.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Pepper v. Triplet (Supreme Court of Louisiana 2004, 864 So. 2d 181)✓A neighbor unlatched a gate and entered a fenced backyard to get his son's football and was bitten; the court held that strict liability under Article 2321 still requires proof the dog posed an unreasonable risk of harm, and this secured dog posed none.
- Granger v. Guillory (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2002, 819 So. 2d 477)✓Two horses got out of a fenced property at night and a passing car struck them; applying the res ipsa loquitur clause of Article 2321, the court upheld a finding that the owner was negligent because he offered no plausible account of how they escaped.
- Rozell v. LA. ANIMAL BREEDERS CO-OP., INC. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1986, 486 So. 2d 968)“…bull's owners is absolute rather than merely strict. [2] La.Civ.Code art. 2321 provides the owner of an animal is liab…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Dog Bite Laws by State: Liability and Victim Rights
§ 2323Comparative faultIn forcecited in 18 of our articles
A.(1) In any action for damages where a person suffers injury, death, or loss, the degree or percentage of fault attributable to all persons causing or contributing to the injury, death, or loss shall be determined, regardless of whether the person is a party to the action or a nonparty, and regardless of the person's insolvency, ability to pay, immunity by statute, including but not limited to the provisions of R.S. 23:1032, or that the other person's identity is not known or reasonably ascertainable. (2) If a person suffers injury, death, or loss partly as the result of his own negligence and partly as a result of the fault of another person or persons, then the following shall apply: (a) If the degree or percentage of negligence attributable to the person suffering injury, death, or loss is equal to or greater than fifty-one percent, then the person suffering injury, death, or loss shall not be entitled to recover damages.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 187 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc. (1988) held assumption of risk no longer bars recovery and that such plaintiff conduct is judged under article 2323's comparative fault reduction. Keith v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co. (1997) held the 1996 amendment to article 2323 procedural and retroactive, so an immune employer's fault is quantified.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc. (Supreme Court of Louisiana 1988, 521 So. 2d 1123)✓Answering a question certified by the Fifth Circuit in a suit over a man paralyzed and killed by a dive into the shallow end of a motel pool, the court held assumption of risk no longer totally bars recovery; that conduct falls under Article 2323 and only reduces damages.
- Miller v. Lammico (Supreme Court of Louisiana 2008, 973 So. 2d 693)✓A jury divided fault among three doctors whose missed diagnosis let a pelvic infection destroy Mrs. Miller's uterus; the court held Article 2323's fault percentages apply to the full damages award before the medical malpractice cap, even where the plaintiff bears no fault.
- Keith v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co. (Supreme Court of Louisiana 1997, 694 So. 2d 180)✓An oilfield worker hurt by rented slips sued the equipment lessor, which pleaded the fault of his compensation-immune employer; the court held the 1996 amendment extending Article 2323 to persons with statutory immunity was procedural and applied retroactively to that case.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Louisiana Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do, Louisiana Dashcam Laws: Mounting, Recording, and Evidence Rules, Motorcycle Accident Laws in Louisiana (2026): Deadlines
§ 2317.1Damage caused by ruin, vice, or defect in thingsIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
The owner or custodian of a thing is answerable for damage occasioned by its ruin, vice, or defect, only upon a showing that he knew or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known of the ruin, vice, or defect which caused the damage, that the damage could have been prevented by the exercise of reasonable care, and that he failed to exercise such reasonable care. Nothing in this Article shall preclude the court from the application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in an appropriate case.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 130 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Williams v. Placid Oil Co. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2017, 16 La.App. 3 Cir. 839)“…d failed to exercise reasonable care to prevent the damage. La.Civ.Code art. 2317.1. 7 Plaintiffs specifically plead and p…”
- Mayes v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2012, 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 465)“…s of their chairs for defects. Plaintiff also contends that La.Civ.Code art. 2317.1 and the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur a…”
- Crooks v. Southwest Louisiana Hospital Assoc. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2012, 97 So. 3d 671)“…brought a claim against LCMH alleging liability pursuant to La.Civ.Code art. 2317.1. A trial was held the week of May 16, 2…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Louisiana Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability Under the Civil Code
Louisiana Revised Statutes
§ 14:102.14Unlawful ownership of dangerous dogIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A. For the purposes of this Section "dangerous dog" means: (1) Any dog which when unprovoked, on two separate occasions within the prior thirty-six-month period, engages in any behavior that requires a defensive action by any person to prevent bodily injury when the person and the dog are off the property of the owner of the dog; or (2) Any dog which, when unprovoked, bites a person causing an injury; or (3) Any dog which, when unprovoked, on two separate occasions within the prior thirty-six-month period, has killed, seriously bitten, inflicted injury, or otherwise caused injury to a domestic animal off the property of the owner of the dog. B. It is unlawful for any person to own a dangerous dog without properly restraining or confining the dog. C. A dangerous dog, while on the owner's property, shall, at all times, be kept indoors, or in a secure enclosure. A dangerous dog may be off the owner's property only if it is restrained by a leash which prevents its escape or access to other persons. D.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In the Matter of Two (2) Canines Seized from Susan Graham, Rayville, Louisiana (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2025)“…n of proving the dogs were “dangerous dogs,” as defined in La. R.S. 14:102.14, because, when unprovoked, they bit a p…”
- Stanley Walloga v. Douglas M. Bonner and Freda F. Bonner (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2024)“…tofalo failed to properly restrain the dog in violation of La. R.S. 14:102.14. He further asserts that this amounts t…”
- James v. Witherington (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2012, 106 So. 3d 582)“…bout the neighborhood freely because he is a dangerous dog. La. R.S. 14:102.14 defines a “dangerous” dog as any dog un…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 14:102.15Unlawful ownership of a vicious dogIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A. For the purposes of this Section "vicious dog" means any dog which, when unprovoked, in an aggressive manner, inflicts serious bodily injury on or kills a human being and was previously determined to be a dangerous dog. B. It is unlawful for any person to own a vicious dog. C. Whoever violates the provisions of this Section shall be fined not more than five hundred dollars or imprisoned for not more than six months, or both. D. The provisions of this Section shall not apply to: (1) Any dog which is owned, or the service of which is employed, by any state or local law enforcement agency for the principal purpose of aiding in the detection of criminal activity, enforcement of laws, or apprehension of offenders. (2) Any dog trained in accordance with the standards of a national or regional search and rescue association to respond to instructions from its handler in the search and rescue of lost or missing individuals and which dog, together with its handler, is prepared to render search and rescue services at the request of law enforcement.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
§ 14:102.13Hearing to determine if dog is dangerous or viciousIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A. The district attorney, the sheriff, an animal control officer, or other designated representative, in the name of and on behalf of the parish and without the payment of any costs, shall be authorized to file a petition in the district court having jurisdiction requesting a hearing for the purpose of determining whether or not a dog should be declared dangerous as defined in R.S. 14:102.14(A) or vicious as defined in R.S. 14:102.15(A). B. Upon the filing of the petition, the district judge shall immediately issue a rule on the owner of the dog to show cause why the dog should not be declared a dangerous or vicious dog. This rule shall, at the time of its issuance, be fixed for hearing not later than five days, including Sundays, half-holidays and holidays, from the date of its issuance, and shall be heard by preference over all other matters and cases fixed for the same day and shall be heard continuously day after day until submitted for adjudication. C. Upon the showing made by the parties on the trial of the rule to show cause, the court shall determine whether the dog is a dangerous dog or a vicious dog and may make other orders authorized by this Section. D.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cross-referenced in the statute itself: § 14:102.14, § 14:102.15
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In the Matter of Two (2) Canines Seized from Susan Graham, Rayville, Louisiana (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2025)“…e restraint and confinement of the dog as provided by law. La. R.S. 14:102.13(D). Alternatively, a dog determined by…”
- Opinion (Louisiana Attorney General Reports 2011)“…fficer to seize and humanely euthanize fighting dogs, while La.R.S. 14:102.13 authorizes an animal control officer t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 3:2772Dog, cat, and kennel licenses fee and certificate; recordsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A. Each parish or municipality that levies a license fee on dogs and cats shall issue a metallic license tag to each dog or cat owner who applies therefor and pays the dog or cat license fee imposed by the issuing parish or municipality. The license tag shall contain a license number, the name of the issuing body and the calendar year for which such tag is issued. The tag shall be fastened upon the collar worn by the dog or cat owned or kept by such person. A license certificate shall also be issued for such license fee showing the name and address of the owner, a description of the dog or cat by sex and color, the breed of the dog or cat if known, and the year and number of the license tag. A record of all such information shall be kept by the issuing authority which shall be open to the public during regular business hours. B. The governing body of each municipality or parish may, by ordinance, fix the sum to be paid annually for the dog or cat license fee, which sum shall not be more than ten dollars for each spayed or neutered dog or cat and not more than twenty dollars for each unspayed or unneutered dog or cat.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Louisiana Civil Code Article 2321 - Damage caused by animals(legis.la.gov).gov
- Act 423 of 2024 - Two-year prescriptive period for delictual actions(legis.la.gov).gov
- Louisiana Civil Code Article 2323 - Comparative fault(legis.la.gov).gov
- RS 14:102.14 - Unlawful ownership of dangerous dog(legis.la.gov).gov
- RS 14:102.13 and RS 14:102.15 - Dangerous and vicious dog hearings and penalties(legis.la.gov).gov
- Governor Landry signs tort reform legislation including HB 431(gov.louisiana.gov).gov
- Louisiana Sanitary Code - Rabies vaccination requirements(ldh.la.gov).gov
- RS 14:102.15 - Unlawful ownership of a vicious dog(legis.la.gov)
- RS 14:102.16 - Seizure and destruction or disposition of dangerous or vicious dogs(legis.la.gov)
- Louisiana Civil Code Article 2317.1 - Damage caused by ruin, vice, or defect in things(legis.la.gov)
- RS 3:2772 - Dog, cat, and kennel licenses fee and certificate; records(legis.la.gov)