Louisiana
Louisiana Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Louisiana's Motor Vehicle Warranty Enforcement Act, La. R.S. 51:1941, protects buyers and lessees of new personal-use vehicles. If the same defect persists after four or more repair attempts, or the vehicle is out of service for 45 or more cumulative calendar days during the warranty period, the manufacturer must replace the vehicle or refund the purchase price.
Overview of Louisiana's Lemon Law
Louisiana's Motor Vehicle Warranty Enforcement Act, codified at La. R.S. 51:1941 through 51:1948, protects consumers who purchase or lease new vehicles that turn out to be defective. The law requires manufacturers to repair vehicles that do not conform to their express warranty. When repairs fail after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer must replace the vehicle or refund the purchase price.

This guide covers what vehicles qualify, how many repair attempts trigger the law, what remedies are available, and how to file a claim.
What Vehicles Are Covered Under La. R.S. 51:1941
Under La. R.S. 51:1941, the law defines who qualifies as a "consumer" and what counts as a covered "motor vehicle."
Who Is a Consumer?
The statute defines a consumer as:
- The purchaser of a new motor vehicle used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes (not purchased for resale)
- A person to whom the vehicle is transferred during the express warranty period
- A person who leases the vehicle
- Any other person entitled to enforce the warranty
This means both buyers and lessees of new vehicles receive protection under the law.
Covered Vehicle Types
- Passenger automobiles, including sedans, coupes, and hatchbacks
- Pickup trucks used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes
- Passenger vans and minivans
- Motor homes under 10,000 pounds GVW (most motor homes meet or exceed this threshold and fall outside the Act's coverage; see below)
- Leased new vehicles
Vehicles Not Covered
- Motorcycles
- Vehicles used primarily for commercial purposes
- Off-road vehicles
- Vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds or more, including most motor homes
- Used vehicles
- Vehicles purchased primarily for resale
Coverage Period
Louisiana's lemon law coverage runs for the shorter of these two periods:
- The term of the manufacturer's express warranty, OR
- One year following the date of original delivery to the consumer
Problems must first be reported within this period to qualify for lemon law protection.
Manufacturer's Duty to Repair Under La. R.S. 51:1942
Under La. R.S. 51:1942, if a new motor vehicle does not conform to an applicable express warranty, the consumer must report the nonconformity to the manufacturer or an authorized dealer and make the vehicle available for repair. The manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer must then make the repairs necessary to bring the vehicle into conformity with the warranty.
This duty applies as long as the consumer reports the problem before the warranty expires or within one year of original delivery, whichever comes first.
What Qualifies as a "Nonconformity"?
A nonconformity is defined as any specific or generic defect or malfunction, or any defect or condition that substantially impairs the use, market value, or both of the motor vehicle. Common examples include:
- Engine or transmission failures
- Brake system malfunctions
- Steering defects
- Electrical system failures
- Fuel system issues
- Suspension defects affecting handling
- Persistent warning lights or error codes
The defect does not need to make the vehicle undrivable. It only needs to substantially impair the vehicle's use or market value.
The Lemon Law Presumption Under La. R.S. 51:1943
Under La. R.S. 51:1943, Louisiana law creates a presumption that a reasonable number of repair attempts have been made when certain thresholds are met. This presumption shifts the burden to the manufacturer.
Presumption Thresholds for Standard Vehicles
| Condition | Requirement | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Repair Attempts (Same Defect) | 4 or more attempts | Same nonconformity continues to exist after 4+ repair attempts |
| Days Out of Service | 45 or more calendar days | Cumulative total during warranty period for repair of any nonconformity |
| Timeframe | Within warranty term or 1 year | Whichever is earlier from date of original delivery |
Either threshold is sufficient on its own. You do not need to meet both.
Motor Homes and the GVW Exclusion
La. R.S. 51:1941(6)(a) excludes any motor vehicle of 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) or above from the Act's definition of a covered motor vehicle. Most motor homes meet or exceed that threshold, which puts them outside the lemon law's coverage entirely. The statute text available does not establish a separate presumption threshold, notification procedure, or manufacturer response deadline specific to motor homes. A motor home under the 10,000-pound GVW threshold would be evaluated under the same standard presumption described above (four or more repair attempts, or 45 or more cumulative days out of service) that applies to any other covered vehicle.
Suspension of Time Periods
Louisiana law provides that time periods for repair may be suspended when repair services cannot be performed due to war, invasion, strike, fire, flood, or natural disaster. Given Louisiana's vulnerability to hurricanes, this provision can be significant for consumers whose repair timelines are disrupted by severe weather events.
Consumer Remedies Under La. R.S. 51:1944
When the presumption under R.S. 51:1943 has been met and the manufacturer still cannot conform the vehicle to the express warranty, La. R.S. 51:1944 requires the manufacturer to provide a remedy.
Replacement or Refund
The manufacturer must either:
- Replace the vehicle with a comparable new motor vehicle, OR
- Refund the full purchase price plus all collateral costs, less a reasonable allowance for use
Under the statute, the manufacturer chooses which remedy to provide. The replacement vehicle must be comparable to the original, and any refund must cover the full purchase price plus collateral costs.
What Is Included in a Refund?
A refund under Louisiana's lemon law includes:
- Full purchase price: The total amount paid for the vehicle
- Collateral costs: Sales tax, license fees, registration fees, and similar governmental charges
- Incidental damages: Reasonable costs resulting from loss of use of the vehicle, such as towing and rental car expenses
Refunds are distributed to the consumer and any lienholder, as their interests may appear.
Reasonable Allowance for Use
The manufacturer may deduct a reasonable allowance for the consumer's use of the vehicle. Under R.S. 51:1944, the allowance is "that amount directly attributable to use by the consumer prior to his first notice of nonconformity to the manufacturer, agent, or dealer and during any subsequent period when the vehicle is not out of service by reason of repair." In practice, this means use after the first complaint is reported does not count against the consumer when the vehicle is awaiting or undergoing repair.
Lease Transactions
If the vehicle was leased rather than purchased, the manufacturer must replace the vehicle or work with the lessor to provide an appropriate refund. The lessee is entitled to recover any amounts paid under the lease, including lease payments and other charges.
How to File a Lemon Law Claim in Louisiana
Successfully pursuing a Louisiana lemon law claim requires careful documentation and following proper procedures.
Step 1: Document All Problems and Repairs
- Keep all repair orders and service invoices
- Record exact dates the vehicle was at the dealership or repair facility
- Document specific symptoms and problems in writing
- Save all correspondence with the dealer and manufacturer
- Note odometer readings at each repair visit
- Take photographs or videos of defects when possible
Step 2: Report Problems Within the Coverage Period
Report each nonconformity to an authorized dealer or the manufacturer as soon as it occurs. Make sure all problems are reported within the warranty term or within one year of original delivery, whichever is earlier.
Step 3: Allow Repair Attempts
The manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer must be given a reasonable opportunity to repair the vehicle. Keep track of every repair visit and how many days the vehicle spends out of service.
Step 4: Use the Manufacturer's Dispute Settlement Procedure (If Required)
If the manufacturer has established an informal dispute settlement procedure that substantially complies with Federal Trade Commission regulations under 16 C.F.R. Part 703, the consumer may be required to use that procedure before filing a lawsuit. Many major manufacturers participate in the BBB AUTO LINE program, which provides free mediation and arbitration.
The manufacturer must clearly disclose the availability of any such program to the consumer.
Step 5: File a Complaint or Lawsuit
If the dispute remains unresolved after exhausting available procedures, the consumer can:
- File a complaint with the Louisiana Attorney General's Consumer Protection Section (phone: 1-800-351-4889)
- File a complaint with the Louisiana Motor Vehicle Commission (LMVC)
- File a civil lawsuit in Louisiana courts
Statute of Limitations
Under La. R.S. 51:1944, a consumer has no more than three years from the date of purchase or one year from the end of the warranty period, whichever is longer, to file suit against the manufacturer.
Key Deadlines Summary
| Deadline | Timeframe |
|---|---|
| Report problems | Within warranty term or 1 year from delivery (whichever is earlier) |
| File lawsuit | 3 years from purchase OR 1 year from warranty end (whichever is longer) |
Do not wait until the last minute to take action. Gather documentation early and consult with an attorney if you believe your vehicle qualifies as a lemon.
Title Branding and Disclosure Requirements
Louisiana law includes important protections for consumers who might unknowingly purchase a vehicle that was previously returned under the lemon law.
Manufacturer Disclosure Under La. R.S. 51:1945.1
Under La. R.S. 51:1945.1, when a manufacturer or dealer resells a vehicle that was returned due to nonconformity, the seller must execute and deliver a written instrument to the buyer. This document must state, in 10-point, all-capital type, that the vehicle was returned to the manufacturer or dealer because it did not conform to its warranty and the defect was not fixed within the time provided by Louisiana law.
Penalties for Non-Disclosure
Failure to properly disclose a vehicle's lemon law buyback history can result in fines ranging from $500 to $1,000 per violation. Consumers who discover they purchased a former lemon without proper disclosure may have additional legal remedies.
Title Transfer Under La. R.S. 51:1945
When a consumer accepts a replacement vehicle or refund, they must surrender the lemon vehicle to the manufacturer along with the certificate of title and all endorsements necessary to transfer ownership. The manufacturer must provide the replacement vehicle or refund within 30 days after the consumer offers to transfer title.
Attorney Fees and Damages
Louisiana's lemon law provides for the recovery of attorney fees, which makes it easier for consumers to find legal representation.
Attorney Fees
If a consumer obtains a judgment in their favor (in whole or in part), they are entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees actually incurred. This means many lemon law attorneys will take cases on a contingency basis, since the manufacturer may be required to pay the consumer's legal costs.
Minimum Damages for Rental Reimbursement Violations
For violations of the manufacturer's duty to reimburse a consumer for a temporary replacement vehicle under R.S. 51:1948(A), the consumer is entitled to recover damages and reasonable attorney fees under R.S. 51:1948(C). The statute provides that damages shall not be less than $200 in any case. This is separate from the $500-$1,000 fine for disclosure violations under R.S. 51:1945.1.
Federal Overlay: Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Consumers may also have claims under the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2301-2312), which provides additional remedies for breach of warranty, including attorney fees. This federal law acts as a backstop to Louisiana's state lemon law and allows consumers to pursue warranty claims in federal court when the amount in controversy exceeds the statutory threshold.
Motor Home Protections
La. R.S. 51:1941(6)(a) excludes motor vehicles of 10,000 pounds GVW or above from the Act's coverage entirely, and most motor homes meet or exceed that weight. The statute text available does not establish a modified presumption threshold or a separate written-notification procedure for motor homes. A motor home light enough to fall under the 10,000-pound GVW threshold would be subject to the same standard presumption and remedy process described earlier in this guide (four or more repair attempts, or 45 or more cumulative days out of service) that applies to any other covered vehicle.
Electric Vehicle Considerations
Electric vehicles sold as new in Louisiana are covered under the lemon law. EV owners should be aware of unique issues that may qualify as nonconformities.
Common EV Defects That May Qualify
- Battery capacity degradation beyond manufacturer specifications
- Charging system failures
- Range substantially below manufacturer representations
- Electric motor malfunctions
- Software defects affecting vehicle operation or safety
- Thermal management system failures
- Regenerative braking problems
- High-voltage system issues
Louisiana Climate Considerations
Louisiana's hot and humid climate can affect EV battery performance and charging systems. Maintain records of:
- Charging history and any failures
- Range performance compared to specifications
- Battery health reports from the dealer
- Software update records
- Error codes and diagnostic information
Manufacturer Defenses
Manufacturers may raise several defenses to lemon law claims in Louisiana.
Common Defenses
| Defense | Manufacturer's Argument | Consumer's Response |
|---|---|---|
| Defect not substantial | Nonconformity does not substantially impair use or market value | Document specific impacts on vehicle use and market value |
| Consumer abuse or neglect | Defect caused by abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications | Provide maintenance records showing proper care |
| Outside coverage period | Problem reported after warranty term or one year expired | Show documentation of reports within coverage period |
| No proper notification | Consumer failed to follow required procedures | Provide repair orders, correspondence, and certified mail receipts |
| Dispute procedure not used | Consumer did not use required informal dispute process | Show completion of required arbitration or that no qualifying program exists |
Louisiana Redhibition: Additional Used Vehicle Protection
While Louisiana's lemon law covers only new vehicles, Louisiana has a separate legal doctrine called redhibition that may help buyers of used vehicles. Under Louisiana Civil Code articles 2520-2548, a buyer may seek to return a defective product (including a used vehicle) if the seller knew or should have known about the defect. This is a broader consumer protection that exists alongside the lemon law.
Consumers with used vehicle problems should consult an attorney about potential redhibition claims.
More Louisiana Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How many repair attempts trigger Louisiana's lemon law?
Under La. R.S. 51:1943, it is presumed that a reasonable number of repair attempts have been made when the same nonconformity has been subject to repair four or more times, or when the vehicle has been out of service for a cumulative total of 45 or more calendar days. Either condition is sufficient on its own. Note that R.S. 51:1941(6)(a) excludes motor vehicles of 10,000 pounds GVW or above, a threshold most motor homes meet or exceed, from the Act's coverage entirely.
Does Louisiana's lemon law cover used vehicles?
No. Louisiana's lemon law applies only to new motor vehicles used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. However, used vehicle buyers may have remedies under Louisiana's redhibition laws (Civil Code articles 2520-2548), the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, or the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.
Does the consumer or the manufacturer choose between a replacement and a refund?
Under La. R.S. 51:1944, the manufacturer chooses whether to replace the vehicle with a comparable new motor vehicle or to refund the full purchase price plus collateral costs, less a reasonable allowance for use. The consumer does not get to select the remedy.
How is the usage allowance calculated in Louisiana?
Under R.S. 51:1944, the allowance is the amount directly attributable to use by the consumer prior to the first notice of nonconformity to the manufacturer, agent, or dealer and during any subsequent period when the vehicle is not out of service by reason of repair. Time spent waiting for or undergoing repairs is excluded from the calculation.
How long do I have to file a lemon law lawsuit in Louisiana?
Under La. R.S. 51:1944, you must file suit within three years from the date you purchased the vehicle or within one year from the end of the warranty period, whichever is longer. Do not delay, because evidence and documentation become harder to gather over time.
Can I recover attorney fees in a Louisiana lemon law case?
Yes. If a judgment is rendered in the consumer's favor, in whole or in part, the consumer is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees actually incurred. This provision makes it possible for many consumers to obtain legal representation on a contingency basis.
What happens if a hurricane disrupts my lemon law repair timeline?
Louisiana law allows for suspension of time periods when repair services cannot be performed due to natural disasters, including hurricanes. Document the dates when repairs were unavailable due to the disaster and how the event affected your ability to seek repairs.
Updates
Repaired four source links that pointed to the wrong Louisiana statute sections; they now link to the Motor Vehicle Warranty statutes (R.S. 51:1941-1944).
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Removed a fabricated 90-day/5-business-day/10-business-day motor-home notification procedure that has no anchor in R.S. 51:1941-1948, corrected the '90 days for motor homes' presumption threshold that was wrongly cited to R.S. 51:1943, added the GVW exclusion (R.S. 51:1941(6)(a) excludes vehicles of 10,000 lbs GVW or above, which most motor homes meet or exceed), and fixed the '$200 minimum damages' figure, which belongs to R.S. 51:1948(C)'s rental-reimbursement provision, not the R.S. 51:1945.1 disclosure penalty.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Louisiana Revised Statutes
§ 51:1944Motor vehicle replacement or refundIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A. If after four or more attempts within the express warranty term or during a period of one year following the date of the original delivery to the consumer of a motor vehicle, whichever is the earlier, the nonconformity has not been repaired or if the vehicle is out of service by reason of repair for a cumulative total of forty-five or more calendar days during the warranty period, the manufacturer shall: (1) Replace the motor vehicle with a comparable new motor vehicle, or, at its option, (2) Accept return of the motor vehicle and refund the full purchase price plus any amounts paid by the consumer at the point of sale, and all collateral costs less a reasonable allowance for use to the consumer, or any holder of a perfected security interest in the motor vehicle, as their interest may appear, if the transaction was a sale. B.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-10 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2004
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McNeely v. Ford Motor Co., Inc. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1999, 763 So. 2d 659)“…cause of action under Louisiana's "Lemon Law." Pursuant to La. R.S. 51:1944 and 51:1947, if plaintiffs were success…”
- Chaudoir v. Porsche Cars of North America (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1995, 667 So. 2d 569)“…ehicle to the applicable express warranties is set forth in La.R.S. 51:1944, which provides, in pertinent part, tha…”
- Guidry v. Ford Motor Co. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2004, 868 So. 2d 945)“…the trial judge erred in finding the claim prescribed under La.R.S.51:1944E, because the prescriptive provision re…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 51:1943Express warranties; time limit to conformIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A.(1) It shall be presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a motor vehicle to the applicable express warranties if the vehicle is out of service by reason of repair for a cumulative total of forty-five or more calendar days or the same nonconformity has been subject to repair four or more times by the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer within the warranty term or during a period of one year following the date of the original delivery of the motor vehicle to the consumer, whichever is the earlier date. (2) If a manufacturer fails to respond to the consumer or to perform the repairs within the time periods described in this Subsection, such manufacturer shall be considered to have waived his rights to a final attempt to cure the nonconformity. B. The term of an express warranty shall be extended by any period of time during which repair services are not available to the consumer because of war, invasion, strike, fire, flood, or natural disaster. C.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Chaudoir v. Porsche Cars of North America (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1995, 667 So. 2d 569)“…ter the expiration of such terms or such one-year period. La.R.S. 51:1943, which governs the time in which the ma…”
- Dreher v. Hood Motor Co., Inc. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1986, 492 So. 2d 132)“…d to a new vehicle or a refund of the purchase price. See La.R.S. 51:1943-44. However, we emphasize that this 30…”
- E.P. Services, Inc. v. Winnebago Industries (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2014, 2012 La.App. 1 Cir. 1678)“…ding authorization of repair of the new damage. 1 Although La. R.S. 51:1943(A)(2) requires a buyer to provide the m…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 51:1942Manufacturer's duty to repair; nonconformityIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
If a new motor vehicle does not conform to an applicable express warranty, and the consumer reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer or any of its authorized motor vehicle dealers and makes the motor vehicle available for repair before the expiration of the warranty or during a period of one year following the date of the original delivery of the motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever is the earlier date, the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer shall make such repairs as are necessary to conform the vehicle to such warranty, notwithstanding the fact that such repairs are made after the expiration of such terms or such one-year period.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1995
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Holloway v. Gulf Motors, Inc. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1991, 588 So. 2d 1322)“…uld be liable to make repairs on the manufacturer's behalf. La.R.S. 51:1942.…”
- Chaudoir v. Porsche Cars of North America (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1995, 667 So. 2d 569)“…utes are commonly referred to as the Louisiana "Lemon Law." La.R.S. 51:1942, which sets forth the duty of a manufac…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 51:1941DefinitionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
The following definitions apply when used in this Chapter: (1) "Collateral costs" means sales tax, license fees, and registration fees and any similar governmental charges. (2) "Consumer" means: (a) The purchaser, other than for purposes of resale, of a new motor vehicle normally used for personal, family, or household purposes and subject to a manufacturer's express warranty. (b) A person, other than for purposes of resale, to whom a motor vehicle is transferred during the duration of an express warranty applicable to the motor vehicle. (c) A person to whom a motor vehicle is leased. (d) Any other person entitled to enforce the warranty. (3) "Dealer" means a person authorized by the manufacturer and actively engaged in the business of buying, selling, or exchanging new automobiles, new personal watercraft, or new all-terrain vehicles at retail and who has an established place of business. (4) "Manufacturer" means any person, firm, association, corporation, or trust, resident or nonresident, who manufactures or assembles new and unused motor vehicles.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Chaudoir v. Porsche Cars of North America (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1995, 667 So. 2d 569)“…law regarding warranties for new motor vehicles is found in La.R.S. 51:1941 et seq., and these statutes are commonl…”
- Smith v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1989, 542 So. 2d 831)“…tion (La.C.C. art. 2520 et seq.) and under the "Lemon Law" (La.R.S. 51:1941 et seq.) against defendants, General Mo…”
- Holloway v. Gulf Motors, Inc. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1991, 588 So. 2d 1322)“…Mrs. Holloway has not pleaded the Louisiana "Lemon Law." La.R.S. 51:1941-1948. She also did not allege or prove…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 51:1945Transfer of title; time limitationIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
At the time of receiving the comparable new motor vehicle or refund under R.S. 51:1944, the consumer, or lessor, where applicable, shall surrender the motor vehicle subject to the nonconformity to the manufacturer together with the certificate of title with all endorsements necessary to transfer title to the manufacturer. The manufacturer shall provide the consumer, or lessor, where applicable, with a comparable new motor vehicle or refund within thirty days after an offer to transfer title in compliance with this Section by the consumer, or lessor, where applicable, or within thirty days after a decision by the informal dispute settlement procedure established by the manufacturer to award a refund or replacement.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cross-referenced in the statute itself: § 51:1944
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1989
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Smith v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1989, 542 So. 2d 831)“…o the vehicle and was therefore incapable of complying with La.R.S. 51:1945. On appeal, appellant urges error in…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 51:1945.1Mandatory disclosure of nonconformity to warranty by sellersIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A.(1) Upon the sale or transfer of title by a manufacturer, its agent, or any dealer of any second-hand motor vehicle, previously returned to a manufacturer for nonconformity to its warranty pursuant to the requirements of this Chapter, the manufacturer shall execute and deliver to the buyer an instrument in writing in a form prescribed by the commissioner setting forth the following information in ten point, all capital type: "IMPORTANT: THIS VEHICLE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER OR DEALER BECAUSE IT DID NOT CONFORM TO ITS WARRANTY AND THE DEFECT OR CONDITION WAS NOT FIXED WITHIN THE TIME PROVIDED BY LOUISIANA LAW." (2) Such notice that a vehicle was returned to the manufacturer because it did not conform to its warranty shall also be conspicuously printed on the motor vehicle's certificate of title. B. The failure of a dealer to deliver to the buyer the instrument required by this Section shall constitute a violation of this Chapter and shall be punishable by a fine of not less than five hundred dollars nor more than one thousand dollars for each violation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Louisiana Civil Code
§ 2520Warranty against redhibitory defectsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
The seller warrants the buyer against redhibitory defects, or vices, in the thing sold. A defect is redhibitory when it renders the thing useless, or its use so inconvenient that it must be presumed that a buyer would not have bought the thing had he known of the defect. The existence of such a defect gives a buyer the right to obtain rescission of the sale. A defect is redhibitory also when, without rendering the thing totally useless, it diminishes its usefulness or its value so that it must be presumed that a buyer would still have bought it but for a lesser price. The existence of such a defect limits the right of a buyer to a reduction of the price.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 133 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Stevens v. Bruce (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2004, 878 So. 2d 734)“…aste on their property was a redhibitory defect pursuant to La.Civ.Code art. 2520. They further alleged that the Bruces a…”
- Dalme v. Blockers Manufactured Homes, Inc. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2001, 0 La.App. 3 Cir. 00244)“…sed their mobile homes had they known of the defects. See La.Civ.Code art. 2520. In summary, we find that the trial c…”
- Mouton v. Generac Power Systems, Inc. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2014, 14 La.App. 3 Cir. 350)“…had prescribed under Louisiana redhibition law pursuant to La.Civ.Code art. 2520. 1 Metro Electric further asserted tha…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- La. R.S. 51:1941 - Definitions (Motor Vehicle Warranty Enforcement Act)(legis.la.gov).gov
- La. R.S. 51:1942 - Manufacturer's Duty to Repair; Nonconformity(legis.la.gov).gov
- La. R.S. 51:1943 - Express Warranties; Time Limit to Conform(legis.la.gov).gov
- La. R.S. 51:1944 - Motor Vehicle Replacement or Refund(legis.la.gov).gov
- Louisiana Attorney General - Consumer Protection Section(ag.state.la.us).gov
- Louisiana Motor Vehicle Commission - File a Complaint(lmvc.la.gov).gov
- 16 C.F.R. Part 703 - Informal Dispute Settlement Procedures(ecfr.gov).gov
- Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2301-2312)(law.cornell.edu)
- BBB AUTO LINE Dispute Resolution Program(bbbprograms.org)