Louisiana
Truck Accident Laws in Louisiana (2026): Deadlines & Liability
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 16, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

A collision with a commercial truck in Louisiana is governed by two layers of law at once. State law sets the deadline to file (in Louisiana, the prescriptive period), decides how shared fault affects recovery, and runs the state's at-fault insurance system. A separate federal layer, enforced by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), sets the safety rules for the driver and the trucking company, and violations of those rules are often the central evidence in a serious truck case.
Louisiana also stands out because two of its core rules changed recently: the injury prescriptive period and the comparative-fault standard. This guide covers the current Louisiana rules first, then the uniform federal trucking framework. It is general legal information, not legal advice about any specific case.
This guide is part of our Truck Accident Laws by State series.
The deadline to file in Louisiana
Louisiana calls its filing deadline a prescriptive period. Historically, injury claims had a very short one-year period. That changed with Act 423 of the 2024 Regular Session, which added Civil Code article 3493.1 and set a two-year prescriptive period for delictual (tort) actions, running from the day the injury or damage is sustained. The two-year period applies prospectively, to causes of action arising on or after July 1, 2024. Injuries that occurred before that date are still governed by the prior one-year period, so the date of the crash determines which deadline applies.
Wrongful-death and survival actions follow their own timeline. They are governed by Civil Code articles 2315.1 (survival) and 2315.2 (wrongful death). Act 423 did not touch them in 2024, but Act 488 of 2025 (HB 291) later amended both articles, effective August 1, 2025, so that the claim now prescribes one year from the date of death or two years from the day the injury or damage is sustained, whichever is longer. Before that amendment, these claims were limited to a flat one year from the date of death. Because the controlling rule turns on the date of death, the operative deadline for a fatal truck crash should be confirmed carefully rather than assumed.
How shared fault works: a 2026 change
Louisiana's comparative-fault rule also recently changed. For years Louisiana followed pure comparative fault, under which an injured party's recovery was reduced by his or her percentage of fault but never barred, even at a very high percentage. Act 15 of the 2025 Regular Session amended Civil Code article 2323 to adopt a modified comparative-fault system. For incidents occurring on or after January 1, 2026, a plaintiff whose share of fault is equal to or greater than 51 percent is barred from recovering anything; if the plaintiff's fault is less than 51 percent, recovery is still reduced in proportion to the plaintiff's fault. In practical terms a plaintiff at exactly 50 percent fault still recovers (reduced by half), while a plaintiff at 51 percent or more recovers nothing. Incidents before January 1, 2026 remain under the older pure-comparative rule even if the suit is filed later.
The practical effect is significant. Under the old rule a plaintiff who was, say, 70 percent at fault could still recover 30 percent of the damages. Under the new rule that same plaintiff recovers nothing. Because trucking companies and their insurers often try to shift blame onto the injured party, the fault allocation is usually a central fight in a Louisiana truck case, and now even more so for crashes from 2026 onward.
At-fault insurance (no PIP threshold)
Louisiana is an at-fault, or tort, state, not a no-fault state. There is no mandatory personal injury protection and no serious-injury or monetary threshold to clear before suing the driver and company responsible for a crash. An injured person pursues the at-fault party (and that party's insurer) directly for medical bills, lost income, pain and suffering, and other losses.
One important caveat runs the other way. Louisiana penalizes an injured person who was driving without the liability insurance the state requires, cutting the first $100,000 off what that person can recover. That rule is described in the auto-insurance section below and is one of the harshest in the country.

Damage caps
Louisiana does not generally cap compensatory damages in an ordinary motor-vehicle injury or wrongful-death case, so a truck-crash victim's economic and non-economic damages are not subject to a blanket statutory limit. (Distinct caps exist in narrow areas such as medical-malpractice claims and certain suits against governmental entities, which are governed by their own statutes and are outside ordinary trucking claims.) Punitive damages are generally not available in Louisiana except where a specific statute authorizes them. The exception that matters most after a vehicle crash is Civil Code article 2315.4, which allows exemplary damages on proof that the injuries were caused by a wanton or reckless disregard for the rights and safety of others by a defendant whose intoxication while operating a motor vehicle was a cause in fact of the injuries. That makes a drunk or drugged truck driver one of the few Louisiana crash scenarios in which punitive damages are on the table.
State auto-insurance context
Louisiana drivers must carry minimum liability coverage of 15/30/25 (in thousands: $15,000 per person and $30,000 per accident for bodily injury, $25,000 for property damage), according to the Louisiana Department of Insurance. Louisiana does not impose a universal PIP requirement. Those state minimums are modest compared with the federal coverage required of interstate trucks, described below.
Louisiana also has a No Pay, No Play law that can wipe out most of a claim. Under La. R.S. 32:866, an owner or operator who failed to own or maintain the compulsory motor vehicle liability security has no recovery for the first $100,000 of bodily injury and no recovery for the first $100,000 of property damage, even when the other driver was entirely at fault. The statute sets that figure at $100,000 following Acts 2025, No. 16. The bar is raised by the defense as an affirmative defense, and narrow exceptions apply, including where the at-fault driver was convicted of driving while intoxicated in connection with the crash, intentionally caused the collision, fled the scene, or was committing a felony at the time. Passengers who do not own the uninsured vehicle keep their full recovery. For a person hit by a commercial truck, this is often the single most consequential Louisiana rule after fault allocation, because it can consume the entire value of a moderate injury claim.
Federal trucking rules: the FMCSA layer
Commercial trucks are regulated by the FMCSA under Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. These rules are uniform nationwide, and proof that a carrier or driver broke one of them is usually at the center of a truck case.
Louisiana, however, limits how much that proof does on its own. Under La. R.S. 9:2800.13, when a damages action alleges that an owner, agent, shipper, transporter, or carrier violated or failed to comply with a state or federal transportation statute or regulation, that violation "shall not be prima facie evidence of negligence or fault," and "the comparative fault laws of Louisiana shall apply in these cases as in all other cases of negligence." The evidence is still admissible and can be persuasive, but a Louisiana plaintiff gets no presumption from it and must still prove ordinary negligence and that the violation helped cause the crash. Several other states treat a federal safety-rule violation as negligence per se or as prima facie negligence; Louisiana does not.
The core areas include:

- Hours of service. Under 49 CFR Part 395, a property-carrying driver may drive up to 11 hours after 10 consecutive hours off duty, may not drive beyond the 14th hour after coming on duty, must take a 30-minute break after 8 hours of driving, and is capped at 60 hours in 7 days or 70 hours in 8 days. Fatigue and falsified logs are recurring issues in truck crashes.
- Electronic logging devices (ELDs). Most drivers must record their hours with an ELD that meets Part 395, replacing paper logs and creating a digital record of driving time.
- Driver qualification and CDL. Drivers must hold a valid commercial driver's license and meet medical and qualification standards under the federal rules.
- Drug and alcohol testing. Carriers must run pre-employment, random, post-accident, and reasonable-suspicion testing programs.
- Vehicle maintenance and inspection. Trucks must be systematically inspected, repaired, and maintained, with records kept, under the federal maintenance rules.
Who can be held liable
A truck case routinely involves more potential defendants than an ordinary car crash, and many are companies:
- the driver, for negligent driving;
- the motor carrier (the trucking company), often vicariously responsible for its driver and directly liable for negligent hiring, training, supervision, or retention;
- a broker or shipper in some circumstances;
- a cargo loader, when improperly loaded or unsecured freight contributes to a crash;
- a parts or equipment manufacturer, if a defective component such as brakes or tires played a role.
Identifying every responsible party matters because Louisiana allocates fault among all of them, and the new modified rule makes the allocation even more consequential.
Federal minimum insurance
Federal law requires far more coverage from interstate trucks than Louisiana requires from cars. Under 49 CFR 387.9, a for-hire motor carrier transporting general (non-hazardous) freight in interstate commerce must maintain at least $750,000 in liability coverage. Carriers hauling certain hazardous materials must carry substantially higher limits. This federal floor is one reason truck claims differ sharply from car claims.
Why preserving evidence early matters
Much of the best evidence in a truck case is electronic and can be lost. ELD and logbook data, the truck's engine control module or "black box" data, dashcam footage, and maintenance and inspection records can be overwritten or routinely discarded on a short cycle. Because of that, a written preservation (spoliation) letter sent to the carrier early can be important to keep that evidence from disappearing. The police crash report, photographs of the scene and vehicles, and your own medical records should also be preserved.

How injury cases are typically handled
Most personal-injury attorneys evaluate truck cases on a contingency-fee basis and offer a free initial consultation, meaning fees are generally a percentage of any recovery rather than an upfront charge. No lawyer can promise a particular outcome or amount, and every case turns on its own facts and evidence. Because Louisiana's deadlines differ for injury versus wrongful-death claims, and trucking evidence can disappear quickly, it is generally wise to evaluate options early.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the deadline to sue for a truck accident in Louisiana?
For injuries on or after July 1, 2024, the prescriptive period is two years under Civil Code article 3493.1 (Act 423 of 2024); for injuries before that date the old one-year period applies. Wrongful-death and survival claims follow Civil Code articles 2315.1 and 2315.2, which Act 488 of 2025 amended effective August 1, 2025 so that the claim prescribes one year from the date of death or two years from the day the injury or damage is sustained, whichever is longer (before that amendment these claims were a flat one year from death). The date of the crash and the type of claim determine which deadline controls, so it should be confirmed early.
Who can be sued after a truck accident in Louisiana?
Often several parties: the driver, the trucking company (both for its driver's conduct and for negligent hiring, training, or supervision), and depending on the facts a broker or shipper, the company that loaded the cargo, or the maker of a defective truck part. Identifying every responsible party matters because Louisiana allocates fault among all of them.
How is a truck accident different from a car accident in Louisiana?
Trucks are governed by federal FMCSA safety rules (hours of service, ELDs, driver qualification, drug-and-alcohol testing, and maintenance), and proof that one of those rules was broken is usually central to the case, though La. R.S. 9:2800.13 provides that a transportation-statute or regulation violation is not prima facie evidence of negligence or fault in Louisiana. Interstate trucks must also carry at least $750,000 in liability coverage rather than Louisiana's small car-policy minimum; there are usually multiple, often corporate, defendants; and key evidence is electronic and can be overwritten, so early preservation matters.
Can I still recover if I was driving without insurance in Louisiana?
Usually only in part. Under Louisiana's No Pay, No Play statute, La. R.S. 32:866, an owner or operator who failed to maintain the compulsory liability security has no recovery for the first $100,000 of bodily injury and no recovery for the first $100,000 of property damage, even against a fully at-fault truck driver. Narrow exceptions apply, including where the at-fault driver was convicted of driving while intoxicated in connection with the crash, intentionally caused the collision, fled the scene, or was committing a felony, and passengers who do not own the uninsured vehicle are not subject to the bar.
How much is a truck accident case worth in Louisiana?
There is no formula and no way to promise an amount. Value depends on the severity and permanence of the injuries, medical costs, lost income, the available insurance, the allocation of fault, and whether the No Pay, No Play bar applies. Louisiana does not generally cap compensatory damages, but for crashes on or after January 1, 2026 a plaintiff whose fault is equal to or greater than 51 percent recovers nothing, and below that line recovery is reduced by the plaintiff's share of fault.
Injured in Louisiana? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Louisiana personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Added Louisiana's No Pay, No Play bar on the first $100,000 of recovery for uninsured drivers, the state rule that a transportation-regulation violation is not prima facie evidence of negligence, and the intoxicated-driver exception that allows exemplary damages.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Louisiana Civil Code
§ 2323Comparative faultIn forcecited in 18 of our articles
A.(1) In any action for damages where a person suffers injury, death, or loss, the degree or percentage of fault attributable to all persons causing or contributing to the injury, death, or loss shall be determined, regardless of whether the person is a party to the action or a nonparty, and regardless of the person's insolvency, ability to pay, immunity by statute, including but not limited to the provisions of R.S. 23:1032, or that the other person's identity is not known or reasonably ascertainable. (2) If a person suffers injury, death, or loss partly as the result of his own negligence and partly as a result of the fault of another person or persons, then the following shall apply: (a) If the degree or percentage of negligence attributable to the person suffering injury, death, or loss is equal to or greater than fifty-one percent, then the person suffering injury, death, or loss shall not be entitled to recover damages.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 187 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc. (1988) held assumption of risk no longer bars recovery and that such plaintiff conduct is judged under article 2323's comparative fault reduction. Keith v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co. (1997) held the 1996 amendment to article 2323 procedural and retroactive, so an immune employer's fault is quantified.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc. (Supreme Court of Louisiana 1988, 521 So. 2d 1123)✓Answering a question certified by the Fifth Circuit in a suit over a man paralyzed and killed by a dive into the shallow end of a motel pool, the court held assumption of risk no longer totally bars recovery; that conduct falls under Article 2323 and only reduces damages.
- Miller v. Lammico (Supreme Court of Louisiana 2008, 973 So. 2d 693)✓A jury divided fault among three doctors whose missed diagnosis let a pelvic infection destroy Mrs. Miller's uterus; the court held Article 2323's fault percentages apply to the full damages award before the medical malpractice cap, even where the plaintiff bears no fault.
- Keith v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co. (Supreme Court of Louisiana 1997, 694 So. 2d 180)✓An oilfield worker hurt by rented slips sued the equipment lessor, which pleaded the fault of his compensation-immune employer; the court held the 1996 amendment extending Article 2323 to persons with statutory immunity was procedural and applied retroactively to that case.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Louisiana Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights, Louisiana Hit and Run Laws: Penalties and What to Do, Louisiana Dashcam Laws: Mounting, Recording, and Evidence Rules
§ 3493.1Delictual actionsIn forcecited in 13 of our articles
Delictual actions are subject to a liberative prescription of two years. This prescription commences to run from the day that injury or damage is sustained. It does not run against minors or interdicts in actions involving permanent disability and brought pursuant to the Louisiana Products Liability Act or state law governing product liability actions in effect at the time of the injury or damage.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 15 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Federal courts in the Eastern District of Louisiana have applied art. 3493.1 prospectively only. Lin (2026) and Geary (2026) held its two-year prescription reaches delictual actions arising after July 1, 2024, so the former one-year period of art. 3492 still governs torts occurring before that date.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Lin (District Court, E.D. Louisiana 2026)✓Property owners counterclaimed over post-Hurricane Ida mitigation work they say gutted their buildings; the court read article 3493.1's two-year prescription as prospective only, so the one-year period governed, and denied summary judgment on a waived, fact-disputed defense.
- Geary (District Court, E.D. Louisiana 2026)✓A grandmother sued over a principal's alleged January 22, 2024 body-slam of her grandson; the court held article 3493.1's two-year period reaches only torts arising after July 1, 2024, so the one-year period applied and the February 2025 suit was time barred.
- Stella Johnson, et al. v. Marathon Petroleum Corporation, et al. (District Court, E.D. Louisiana 2026)✓Residents suing over an August 2023 refinery fire moved in November 2024 to widen the class; the court noted article 3493.1's two-year period applies only prospectively, applied the former one-year period, and held the expanded class definition prescribed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Louisiana Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Motorcycle Accident Laws in Louisiana (2026): Deadlines, Louisiana Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability Under the Civil Code
§ 2315.2Wrongful death actionIn forcecited in 12 of our articles
A. If a person dies due to the fault of another, suit may be brought by the following persons to recover damages which they sustained as a result of the death: (1) The surviving spouse and child or children of the deceased, or either the spouse or the child or children. (2) The surviving father and mother of the deceased, or either of them if he left no spouse or child surviving. (3) The surviving brothers and sisters of the deceased, or any of them, if he left no spouse, child, or parent surviving. (4) The surviving grandfathers and grandmothers of the deceased, or any of them, if he left no spouse, child, parent, or sibling surviving. B. The right of action granted by this Article prescribes one year from the death of the deceased or two years from the day that injury or damage is sustained, whichever is longer. C. The right of action granted under this Article is heritable, but the inheritance of it neither interrupts nor prolongs the prescriptive period defined in this Article.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 58 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Jenkins v. Long Term Care Managers, Inc. (2000) applied article 2315.2's beneficiary hierarchy: a surviving child, even one informally acknowledged, leaves the decedent's mother no right of action. Wartelle v. Women's and Children's Hosp., Inc. (1997) restated that article 26 treats a stillborn fetus as a person only for wrongful death.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Wartell v. Woman's & Children's Hosp. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1996, 676 So. 2d 632)✓Parents whose baby was stillborn after a fetal heart monitor was removed for about ninety minutes won $250,000; reviewing that wrongful death award under article 2315.2, the court found no abuse of discretion given the couple's documented grief and affirmed it.
- Jenkins v. Long Term Care Managers, Inc. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2000, 758 So. 2d 863)“…ded Ms. Jenkins from recovery under a wrongful death claim. La. Civ.Code art. 2315.2. The trial court denied Long Term Care’…”
- McKenzie v. LeBlanc (Louisiana Court of Appeal 1998, 98 La.App. 3 Cir. 0353)“…sustained between the time of injury and the time of death. La.Civ.Code art. 2315.2 is *712 another exception. That Articl…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Medical Malpractice Laws in Louisiana (2026): Deadlines & Caps, Louisiana Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type, Louisiana Wrongful Death Laws (2026): Deadlines
§ 2315.1Survival actionIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
A. If a person who has been injured by an offense or quasi offense dies, the right to recover all damages for injury to that person, his property or otherwise, caused by the offense or quasi offense, shall survive for a period of one year from the death of the deceased or two years from the day that injury or damage is sustained, whichever is longer, in favor of: (1) The surviving spouse and child or children of the deceased, or either the spouse or the child or children. (2) The surviving father and mother of the deceased, or either of them if he left no spouse or child surviving. (3) The surviving brothers and sisters of the deceased, or any of them, if he left no spouse, child, or parent surviving. (4) The surviving grandfathers and grandmothers of the deceased, or any of them, if he left no spouse, child, parent, or sibling surviving. B. In addition, the right to recover all damages for injury to the deceased, his property or otherwise, caused by the offense or quasi offense, may be urged by the deceased's succession representative in the absence of any class of beneficiary set out in Paragraph A. C.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 89 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Wartelle v. Women's and Children's Hosp., Inc. (Supreme Court of Louisiana 1997, 704 So. 2d 778)“…48. Specifically, they filed a survival action pursuant to La. Civ. Code art. 2315.1, an action for the wrongful death of th…”
- Randall v. Concordia Nursing Home (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2007, 965 So. 2d 559)“…amages inflicted upon her by Camelot survived her death per La.Civ.Code art. 2315.1(A). This right to recover is bestowed u…”
- Watkins v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (Supreme Court of Louisiana 2014, 145 So. 3d 237)“…r time period for instituting a survival action pursuant to La. Civ.Code art. 2315.1, particularly as amended by Acts 1986,…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 49
§ 387.9Financial responsibility, minimum levels.In forcecited in 52 of our articles
The minimum levels of financial responsibility referred to in § 387.7 are hereby prescribed as follows: Table 1 to § 387.9—Schedule of Limits—Public Liability Type of carriage Commodity transported January 1, 1985 (1) For-hire (In interstate or foreign commerce, with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Property (nonhazardous) $750,000 (2) For-hire and Private (In interstate, foreign, or intrastate commerce, with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Hazardous substances, as defined in 49 CFR 171.8, transported in bulk in cargo tanks, portable tanks, or hopper-type vehicles; in bulk Division 1.1, 1.2 or 1.3 materials; in bulk Division 2.3, Hazard Zone A material; in bulk Division 6.1, Packing Group I, Hazard Zone A material, in bulk Division 2.1 or 2.2 material; or highway route controlled quantities of a Class 7 material, as defined in 49 CFR 173.403 5,000,000 (3) For-hire and Private (In interstate or foreign commerce, in any quantity; or in intrastate commerce, in bulk only; with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds) Oil listed in 49 CFR 172.101; hazardous waste, hazardous materials, or hazardous substances defined in 49…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 45 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Yeates (2009) held an MCS-90 endorsement applies only where the underlying policy gives no coverage and the carrier's insurance falls below the minimums 49 CFR 387.9 prescribes. GREAT WEST CAS. v. General Cas. Co. of Wisconsin (2010) found that purpose met once other coverage exceeded the 387.9 amount.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- GREAT WEST CAS. v. General Cas. Co. of Wisconsin (District Court, D. Minnesota 2010, 734 F. Supp. 2d 718)“…ardous commodities is $750,000. 49 U.S.C. § 31139 (b)(2); 49 C.F.R. § 387.9 . Under the Federal Motor Carrie…”
- Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Yeates (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2009, 584 F.3d 868)✓A trucker's own insurer paid the Yeateses the full $750,000 that section 387.9 sets as the minimum for non-hazardous property, and the en banc court held a second insurer's MCS-90 endorsement was therefore never triggered and added no coverage.
- American Inter-Fidelity Exchange v. American Re-Insurance Company (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 1994, 17 F.3d 1018)✓A truck insurer sought reinsurance for $846,256 in deductibles it paid accident victims but could not collect; the court read the mandatory endorsement to require insurers to cover victims from the first dollar up to section 387.9's minimums, and reversed the dismissal.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Truck Accident Laws in Connecticut (2026): Deadlines & Liability, Truck Accident Laws in Alabama (2026): Deadlines & Liability, Truck Accident Laws in Iowa (2026): Deadlines & Liability
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Louisiana Civil Code article 3493.1 (added by Acts 2024, No. 423): two-year prescriptive period for delictual actions, effective July 1, 2024(legis.la.gov).gov
- Louisiana Civil Code article 2323 (amended by Acts 2025, No. 15): comparative fault, barring recovery where the plaintiff's fault is equal to or greater than 51% for incidents on or after January 1, 2026(legis.la.gov).gov
- Enrolled Act No. 423 (2024 Regular Session, HB 315): two-year prescription for delictual actions(legis.la.gov).gov
- Louisiana Civil Code article 2315.2 (wrongful death) and article 2315.1 (survival), as amended by Acts 2025, No. 488 (eff. Aug. 1, 2025): one year from death or two years from injury, whichever is longer(legis.la.gov).gov
- 49 CFR Part 395: FMCSA hours-of-service and ELD requirements for commercial drivers(ecfr.gov).gov
- 49 CFR 387.9: minimum levels of financial responsibility ($750,000 for general-freight for-hire interstate carriers)(ecfr.gov).gov
- FMCSA hours-of-service overview (11-hour, 14-hour, 30-minute break, 60/70-hour limits)(fmcsa.dot.gov).gov
- Louisiana Department of Insurance: state minimum auto liability requirements (15/30/25), at-fault system(ldi.la.gov).gov
- Louisiana Revised Statutes 9:2800.13: an alleged violation of a state or federal transportation statute or regulation by an owner, agent, shipper, transporter, or carrier is not prima facie evidence of negligence or fault; comparative fault applies(legis.la.gov)
- Louisiana Revised Statutes 32:866 (No Pay, No Play, amended by Acts 2025, No. 16): no recovery for the first $100,000 of bodily injury and the first $100,000 of property damage where the claimant failed to maintain compulsory liability security(legis.la.gov)
- Louisiana Civil Code article 2315.4: exemplary damages where injuries were caused by wanton or reckless disregard by a defendant whose intoxication while operating a motor vehicle was a cause in fact(legis.la.gov)