Louisiana
Louisiana AI Laws and Regulation (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Louisiana regulates AI through targeted criminal statutes rather than a comprehensive framework. R.S. 14:73.13, enacted in 2023, criminalizes sexual deepfakes of minors and of nonconsenting adults alike, carrying 10 to 30 years at hard labor for distribution. Since August 1, 2026, state law also requires an artificial intelligence disclosure on electioneering communications that portray a candidate. The state's Division of Administration separately governs AI use by all state agencies, requiring human oversight and labeling of AI-generated content.
Artificial intelligence regulation in Louisiana is in a formative stage. The state has enacted targeted criminal laws addressing AI-generated deepfakes, along with a disclosure requirement for AI-generated election communications, but it has not passed comprehensive AI governance legislation. With at least 18 AI bills filed for the 2026 legislative session, Louisiana lawmakers moved aggressively to regulate how AI is used across criminal conduct, healthcare, political campaigns, consumer transactions, and the workplace.
This guide covers Louisiana's current AI laws, the 2026 session outcomes, executive branch AI policies, and how federal developments affect the state.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. AI regulation is evolving rapidly. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney for advice about your specific situation.
Enacted AI Laws in Louisiana
Louisiana does not have a comprehensive AI regulatory framework like Illinois's HB 3773 (Colorado's SB 24-205 was repealed and replaced by the narrower SB 26-189 before it ever took effect). Instead, the state has taken a targeted approach, enacting criminal statutes that address specific harmful uses of AI technology and, since 2026, a disclosure rule for AI in election communications. The Louisiana State Legislature has focused primarily on deepfake-related crimes.
R.S. 14:73.13: Unlawful Deepfakes
Louisiana's most significant AI law is R.S. 14:73.13, enacted by Acts 2023, No. 457, and amended by Act 782 of the 2026 Regular Session. The statute criminalizes the creation, possession, and distribution of sexual deepfake material. Its creation-and-possession offense is limited to material depicting a minor, but its distribution offense reaches deepfakes of any person, adults included, whenever the depicted person did not consent.
The law defines a "deepfake" as any audio or visual media in an electronic format, including any motion picture film or video recording, that is created, altered, or digitally manipulated in a manner that would falsely appear to a reasonable observer to be an authentic record of the actual speech or conduct of the individual.
That definition carries an express carve-out. "Deepfake" does not include material that constitutes a work of political, public interest, or newsworthy value, including commentary, criticism, satire, or parody. It also excludes material that carries content, context, or a clear disclosure visible throughout the recording that would cause a reasonable person to understand the media is not a record of a real event. Those exclusions are why R.S. 14:73.13 was never a general-purpose political deepfake law.

Penalties under R.S. 14:73.13:
| Offense | Imprisonment | Fine |
|---|---|---|
| Creating or possessing a sexual deepfake depicting a minor | 5 to 20 years at hard labor, at least 5 without parole | Up to $10,000 |
| Distributing, selling, or exchanging a sexual deepfake of any person without that person's consent | 10 to 30 years at hard labor | Up to $50,000 |
| Distributing, selling, or exchanging a sexual deepfake depicting a minor | 10 to 30 years at hard labor, at least 10 without parole | Up to $50,000 |
| Offender is an educator and the victim is a student (added by Act 782) | Additional 2 years, served consecutively | None specified |
These penalties are among the most severe in the nation for AI-generated sexual exploitation material. The statute treats AI-generated child sexual abuse material with the same seriousness as traditional child exploitation offenses, and it gives adult victims of nonconsensual sexual deepfakes a felony remedy rather than only the misdemeanor-level provisions of R.S. 14:73.14.
R.S. 14:73.14: Nonconsensual AI-Generated Intimate Images
Louisiana also enacted R.S. 14:73.14, which addresses the nonconsensual dissemination or sale of AI-generated intimate images of another person. Under this statute, it is unlawful to disseminate or sell any video or still image created by artificial intelligence that depicts another person in a state of nudity when done with the intent to coerce, harass, or intimidate.
The statute specifically covers images showing a person who is "totally nude or in a state of undress so as to expose the genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast." The person disseminating the content must know or have reason to know that they lack authorization to distribute the material.
Act 782 of the 2026 Regular Session raised the penalty. The baseline offense moved from up to six months and a $750 fine to imprisonment with or without hard labor for up to one year, a fine of up to $1,000, or both. Where the depicted person is under the age of 17, the term rises to up to five years, with at least one year imposed without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. As under R.S. 14:73.13, an offender who is an educator and whose victim is a student may receive an additional two years, served consecutively.
This law fills an important gap in Louisiana's existing revenge porn statute by explicitly covering AI-generated synthetic media rather than just authentic photographs or videos.
R.S. 14:73.14.1: Unlawful Possession of AI-Created Images
Act 782, cited as "The Ivy Daniels Act," also created a new possession crime. R.S. 14:73.14.1 makes it unlawful to possess any video or still image created by artificial intelligence that depicts another person who is under the age of 17 and totally nude or in a state of undress exposing the genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breasts, when the possessor knows or has reason to know they are not authorized to possess it.
The offense carries imprisonment with or without hard labor for up to five years, with at least one year imposed without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. An educator whose victim is a student faces an additional two consecutive years. An offender under the age of 14 is handled exclusively under Title VII of the Louisiana Children's Code, and the section does not apply to interactive computer services, email service providers, or a person who neither intended nor consented to receive the image.
The same act amended Louisiana's sexting statute (R.S. 14:81.1.1) to cover AI-created images and requires public school principals to distribute information about these offenses to students in grade six and above, and to their parents or guardians, during the first five days of each school year.
Deepfake Laws and Elections

Governor's Veto of the 2024 Political Deepfake Bill
In 2024, the Louisiana Legislature passed HB 154 by Representative Mandie Landry, which would have prohibited the use of AI-generated deepfakes to deceive voters in elections.
Governor Jeff Landry vetoed the bill on June 20, 2024, stating: "While I applaud the efforts to prevent false political attacks, I believe this bill creates serious First Amendment concerns as it relates to emerging technologies. The law is far from settled on this issue, and I believe more information is needed before such regulations are enshrined into law."
The governor also vetoed a companion bill that would have required deepfake media to carry watermark disclosures. For the two years that followed, AI-generated content in Louisiana political advertising faced no specific legal restrictions.
Act 806 (HB 459): AI Disclosure on Electioneering Communications
Representative Mandie Landry returned to the issue in 2026, and this time the bill became law. HB 459 passed the House 67-34 and the Senate 35-2, was signed by the governor on June 9, 2026 as Act 806, and took effect August 1, 2026.
Act 806 amends R.S. 18:1463 to prohibit making, or causing to be made, any electioneering communication that portrays a candidate or an elected official subject to recall and that has been created, altered, or digitally manipulated through artificial intelligence in a manner that would falsely appear to a reasonable observer to be an authentic record of that person's actual speech or conduct, unless the communication carries a clear and understandable disclosure that it was created using artificial intelligence. The disclosure must follow the same form rules as the existing paid-for disclosure: audible and visible for at least three seconds in visual and oral announcements, and in digital material sized at least as large as the smallest text in the item, with reasonable color contrast.
A violation is punishable by a fine of up to $2,000, imprisonment with or without hard labor for up to two years, or both, but only where the violation is committed with the intent to injure the reputation of a candidate or elected official subject to recall or to otherwise deceive a voter. The requirement does not apply to a media entity that broadcasts a paid political announcement, advertisement, or electioneering communication over which the broadcaster had no input or control.
The act also broadened the definition of "electioneering communication." It previously reached broadcast, cable, or satellite communications aired within 60 days of an election; it now covers any printed, digital, or broadcast communication containing express advocacy for or against a candidate, a recall, or a ballot proposition. That change substantially widens the reach of the new AI disclosure duty.
Executive Branch AI Policy
Division of Administration AI Acceptable Use Policy
The Louisiana Division of Administration, through its Office of Technology Services (OTS), issued a comprehensive AI Acceptable Use Policy governing all state agencies. This policy applies to all state government entities under OTS authority, pursuant to Act 712 of the 2014 Regular Legislative Session.
Key provisions of the policy include:
Covered Technologies: The policy governs machine learning algorithms, automated decision-making systems, generative AI and large language models, and cognitive computing applications used by state agencies.
Data Governance: All state agencies must ensure AI use complies with agency data governance policies, data classification standards, record retention schedules, and Louisiana public records laws.
Ownership: All AI-generated outputs created on behalf of the State of Louisiana are state property. Users waive any rights of ownership or authorship in such outputs.
Prohibited Uses: State employees may not use AI to independently make business decisions, bypass security controls, or create material without labeling it as AI-generated.
Incident Reporting: Unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential state data in AI systems must be reported to the OTS Information Security Team at infosecteam@la.gov or by calling 844-692-8019.
K-12 Education AI Guidance
The Louisiana Department of Education released guidance in August 2024 for the responsible use of artificial intelligence in K-12 classrooms. This guidance establishes frameworks for how teachers and students can use AI tools while maintaining academic integrity and student data privacy.
Louisiana Board of Regents AI Policy
The Louisiana Board of Regents adopted a policy on the responsible, ethical, and secure use of AI in higher education institutions across the state. This policy provides guidelines for colleges and universities in the Louisiana system.
Legislative Study Committee
Through SCR 49 (2023 Regular Session), Louisiana established a legislative study initiative. This resolution directed the Joint Committee on Technology and Cybersecurity to study the impact of artificial intelligence on state operations, procurement, and policy. The resolution also provided an early working definition of AI for state purposes.
AI Legislation in the 2026 Session
The 2026 Louisiana legislative session saw a surge of AI-related proposals, with at least 18 bills filed covering criminal conduct, healthcare, political campaigns, consumer transactions, and workplace AI use. Industry pushback slowed broader efforts, and the session ultimately sent four AI bills to the governor: SB 42, SB 110, HB 119, and HB 459. All four took effect August 1, 2026. Healthcare, insurance, mental health chatbot, and employment AI proposals all failed.
Child Exploitation Laws: SB 42 (Act 892) and SB 110 (Act 211)
Senate Bill 42 by Senator Rick Edmonds (R-Baton Rouge) prohibits using artificial intelligence to create child sexual abuse materials. The bill passed the Louisiana Senate 36-0, passed the House, and was signed into law as Act 892, effective August 1, 2026.
Senate Bill 110 by Senator Heather Cloud (R-Turkey Creek) bars using a child's image to train an artificial intelligence model to produce child sexual abuse materials. This addresses a gap in existing law by targeting the training process itself rather than just the output. The bill was signed into law as Act 211, effective August 1, 2026.
HB 119 (Act 782): The Ivy Daniels Act
House Bill 119 by Representative Bryan Fontenot passed the House 101-0 and the Senate 34-0 and was signed as Act 782 on June 9, 2026. It is the session's most substantial change to Louisiana's AI criminal law: it created the new possession offense at R.S. 14:73.14.1, raised the penalties under R.S. 14:73.14, added educator-and-student sentencing enhancements to both R.S. 14:73.13 and R.S. 14:73.14, extended the sexting statute to AI-created images, and required schools to inform students and parents about these offenses each year. The provisions are described in detail in the sections above.
HB 459 (Act 806): Election AI Disclosure
House Bill 459 by Representative Mandie Landry requires a clear disclosure when an electioneering communication portraying a candidate or an elected official subject to recall was created using artificial intelligence, with a fine of up to $2,000 and up to two years of imprisonment for violations committed with intent to injure a candidate's reputation or deceive a voter. It is covered in the elections section above.

Healthcare AI Bills That Failed
House Bill 114 by Representative Domangue would have regulated the use of artificial intelligence by healthcare providers, confining clinicians to using AI for analytical and administrative work while blocking autonomous diagnosis or treatment. All AI recommendations involving patient care would have had to occur under the supervision of licensed healthcare professionals, with violations subject to civil penalties of up to $10,000 per infraction and Louisiana Department of Health investigative authority. The bill was filed in the 2025 Regular Session and stalled in the House Health and Welfare Committee after an April 29, 2025 hearing; it was not enacted and was not refiled under this number in 2026.
Senate Bill 246 would have required insurers to have a licensed human reviewer sign off on any coverage decisions made by an AI system, mandated a process for policyholders to appeal those decisions, and required insurers to disclose when an AI or automated decision system was used in any part of the coverage determination. The bill was withdrawn from the Senate on May 28, 2026, and did not pass.
Mental Health Chatbot Regulation
Senate Bill 5 by Senator Bob Hensgens targeted mental health chatbots specifically. The bill would have required AI-powered mental health tools to disclose that they are AI, limited how they share user data, and set rules for handling self-harm disclosures. It did not advance out of the Senate Health and Welfare Committee and did not become law.
Workplace AI and Consumer Protection
Other 2026 proposals addressing automated hiring decisions and AI disclosures to consumers also failed to reach the governor. The business lobby pushed back particularly strongly against employment AI regulations.
AI in Employment
Louisiana does not currently have any enacted legislation specifically regulating the use of AI in employment and hiring decisions. The state's existing employment discrimination framework spans several parts of the Louisiana Employment Discrimination Law. R.S. 23:332 prohibits intentional discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, military status, and natural, protective, or cultural hairstyle. Separate parts of the same chapter separately prohibit age discrimination against individuals 40 and older (R.S. 23:311-23:312) and disability discrimination (R.S. 23:322-23:324).
These existing protections would theoretically apply to AI-driven hiring tools that produce discriminatory outcomes. If an AI screening tool systematically disadvantages applicants based on a protected characteristic, an employer could face liability under Louisiana's anti-discrimination statutes.
However, Louisiana lacks the specific AI hiring requirements found in states like Illinois (which requires disclosure and consent for AI video interview analysis), Colorado (which mandates deployer risk assessments for high-risk AI systems), or New York City (which requires bias audits of automated employment decision tools under Local Law 144).
Bills that would have addressed this gap were filed in 2026 but did not pass, and business advocacy groups resisted them.
Federal AI Policy Impact on Louisiana
TAKE IT DOWN Act
The federal TAKE IT DOWN Act (P.L. 119-12), signed May 19, 2025, creates a federal floor for nonconsensual intimate deepfakes. This law criminalizes the publication of AI-generated intimate images without consent, with penalties of up to 2 years for adult victims and 3 years for minor victims. Louisiana's R.S. 14:73.13, R.S. 14:73.14, and R.S. 14:73.14.1 provide additional state-level penalties that can stack on top of federal charges.
Trump Administration Executive Orders
President Trump's Executive Order 14179 (January 2025) revoked the Biden-era AI safety executive order and shifted federal policy toward deregulation. EO 14365 (December 2025) established a DOJ AI Litigation Task Force that could challenge state AI laws.
For Louisiana, this federal approach remains broadly compatible with the state's posture, which is criminal-law-first and stops short of a comprehensive AI regulatory framework, though the 2026 election disclosure law moved the state closer to the majority of states that regulate AI in campaign communications.
Federal Preemption Concerns
If Congress passes comprehensive AI legislation, it could preempt some Louisiana state laws. However, most legal scholars agree that state criminal statutes like Louisiana's deepfake laws would likely survive federal preemption because they address conduct (child exploitation, harassment) rather than regulating AI technology itself.
Looking Ahead
The 2026 session was Louisiana's most productive on AI to date, producing four laws that all took effect August 1, 2026. Every one of them was a criminal or election-integrity measure. The broader proposals, covering healthcare AI, insurance coverage decisions, mental health chatbots, automated hiring, and consumer disclosures, all failed, largely under industry pressure.
That pattern suggests Louisiana will keep extending its targeted approach rather than adopting a comprehensive AI framework in the near term. Healthcare AI and insurance coverage decisions are the most likely candidates for another attempt in a future session, since both drew bipartisan interest before stalling.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. AI regulation is evolving rapidly, and new legislation may be enacted after this article was last reviewed. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney for advice about your specific situation. Last reviewed: September 2026.
More Louisiana Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Louisiana have a comprehensive AI law?
No. Louisiana does not have a comprehensive AI regulatory framework like Colorado or Illinois. The state has enacted targeted criminal statutes addressing sexual deepfakes (R.S. 14:73.13), AI-generated intimate images (R.S. 14:73.14), and possession of AI-created images of a person under 17 (R.S. 14:73.14.1), plus an AI disclosure requirement for election communications under R.S. 18:1463. The 2026 legislative session produced four AI laws: SB 42 (Act 892), SB 110 (Act 211), HB 119 (Act 782), and HB 459 (Act 806), all effective August 1, 2026.
What are the penalties for creating AI deepfakes in Louisiana?
Under R.S. 14:73.13, creating or possessing a sexual deepfake depicting a minor is punishable by 5 to 20 years at hard labor and a fine up to $10,000, with at least 5 years served without parole. Distributing, selling, or exchanging a sexual deepfake of any person, adult or minor, without that person's consent carries 10 to 30 years at hard labor and a fine up to $50,000, with at least 10 years served without parole where the depicted person is a minor. Since August 1, 2026, an offender who is an educator and whose victim is a student may receive an additional two consecutive years.
Are political deepfakes legal in Louisiana?
Not without a disclosure. Governor Jeff Landry vetoed HB 154 in 2024, so for two years Louisiana had no AI rules for campaign material. HB 459 (Act 806) changed that effective August 1, 2026: an electioneering communication that portrays a candidate or an elected official subject to recall and that was created, altered, or digitally manipulated with AI to look like an authentic record of that person's speech or conduct must carry a clear disclosure that it was created using artificial intelligence. Violating that rule with intent to injure a candidate's reputation or deceive a voter carries a fine up to $2,000, up to two years of imprisonment, or both.
Does Louisiana regulate AI in hiring and employment?
Not yet. Louisiana has no enacted law specifically addressing AI in hiring decisions. The state's existing employment discrimination statute (R.S. 23:332) applies broadly to discriminatory practices, which could include biased AI tools, but there are no specific requirements for bias audits, candidate disclosure, or algorithmic transparency. Bills filed in the 2026 session that would have addressed this gap did not pass.
How does Louisiana regulate AI in healthcare?
As of September 2026, Louisiana has no enacted law specifically regulating AI in healthcare. HB 114, filed in the 2025 Regular Session, would have required that AI in healthcare settings be limited to analytical and administrative work, with licensed professional supervision required for any patient care decisions, but it stalled in committee and was not enacted. SB 246 would have required human review of AI-driven insurance coverage decisions, but it was withdrawn from the Senate on May 28, 2026, and did not pass.
Updates
Corrected the enactment year of the state deepfake statute, clarified that it also protects adult victims, added the 2026 laws the article had missed (Act 782, the Ivy Daniels Act, and Act 806, which now requires an AI disclosure on election communications), and refreshed the review date.
Updated to reflect that Louisiana's two child-exploitation AI bills, SB 42 and SB 110, were enacted as Act 892 and Act 211 (both effective August 1, 2026) rather than still pending, and that SB 246 was withdrawn from the Senate on May 28, 2026; removed a dead Louisiana Department of Education citation link.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Updated Colorado AI Act coverage: SB 24-205 was repealed and replaced by SB 26-189 (2026) before taking effect.
Corrected HB 114's status: the healthcare AI bill was filed in the 2025 Regular Session (not pending in 2026) and stalled in House committee without enactment; the $10,000/violation penalty and Department of Health investigative authority are accurate to the bill text.
Corrected R.S. 23:332's protected-characteristics list to match the statute (race, color, religion, sex, national origin, military status, and protective hairstyle) and attributed Louisiana's age and disability employment-discrimination protections to their correct, separate statutory provisions (R.S. 23:311-23:312 and R.S. 23:322-23:324) rather than to 23:332 itself.
Narrowed the disability-discrimination citation to R.S. 23:322-23:324; the previously included section 23:325 was repealed in 1999.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Louisiana Revised Statutes
§ 14:73.13Unlawful deepfakesIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
A. Any person who, with knowledge that the material is a deepfake depicting a minor, knowingly creates or possesses material that depicts a minor engaging in sexual conduct shall be punished by imprisonment at hard labor for not less than five nor more than twenty years, or a fine of not more than ten thousand dollars, or both. At least five years of the sentence of imprisonment imposed shall be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. B.(1) Except as provided in Paragraph (2) of this Subsection, any person who, with knowledge that the material is a deepfake that depicts another person, without consent of the person depicted, engaging in sexual conduct, knowingly advertises, distributes, exhibits, exchanges with, promotes, or sells any sexual material shall be punished by imprisonment at hard labor for not less than ten nor more than thirty years, a fine of not more than fifty thousand dollars, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Also relied on in: Louisiana Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Louisiana Video Recording Laws: Surveillance Rules and Privacy Limits, Louisiana Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Offenses, Penalties, and Protections
§ 14:73.14Unlawful dissemination or sale of images of another created by artificial intelligenceIn forcecited in 10 of our articles
A. It shall be unlawful for any person, with the intent to coerce, harass, intimidate, or maliciously disseminate or sell any video or still image created by artificial intelligence that depicts another person who is totally nude or in a state of undress so as to expose the genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast, when the person disseminating the video or still image knows or has reason to know that the person is not licensed or authorized to disseminate or sell such video or still image. B. The provisions of this Section shall not apply to an interactive computer service, electronic mail service provider, or a provider of a telecommunications service or any information service as defined in 47 U.S.C. 153, system, or access software provider that provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a computer server that was used by a person to commit any act prohibited by Subsection A of this Section. C.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Also relied on in: Louisiana Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026)
§ 23:332Intentional discrimination in employmentIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
A. It shall be unlawful discrimination in employment for an employer to engage in any of the following practices: (1) Intentionally fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to intentionally discriminate against any individual with respect to compensation, or terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of the individual's race, color, religion, sex, national origin, military status, or natural, protective, or cultural hairstyle. (2) Intentionally limit, segregate, or classify employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities, or otherwise adversely affect the individual's status as an employee, because of the individual's race, color, religion, sex, national origin, military status, or natural, protective, or cultural hairstyle. (3) Intentionally pay wages to an employee at a rate less than that of another employee of the opposite sex for equal work on jobs in which their performance requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility and which are performed under similar working conditions.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.la.gov
Cited in 69 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hare v. Paleo Data, Inc. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2012, 2011 La.App. 4 Cir. 1034)“…against him for gender discrimination damages, pursuant to La. R.S. 23:332, because he was not her employer as def…”
- Barringer v. Robertson (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2015, 2015 La.App. 1 Cir. 0698)“…ations of racial discrimination and retaliation pursuant to La. R.S. 23:332(A), La. Const, art. I, § 3, 42 U.S.C. 1…”
- Motton v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (Louisiana Court of Appeal 2005, 900 So. 2d 901)“…in Title 23 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. Pursuant to La. R.S. 23:332(A) [3] , it is unlawful for an employer…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Louisiana R.S. 14:73.13 - Unlawful Deepfakes Depicting Minors(legis.la.gov).gov
- Louisiana R.S. 14:73.14 - Unlawful Dissemination of AI-Generated Images(legis.la.gov).gov
- Louisiana Division of Administration - AI Acceptable Use Policy(doa.la.gov).gov
- Louisiana R.S. 23:332 - Employment Discrimination(legis.la.gov).gov
- Louisiana SCR 49 - AI Study Resolution(legis.la.gov).gov
- Louisiana HB 114 - Healthcare AI Regulation(legis.la.gov).gov
- Louisiana Board of Regents - AI Use Policy(laregents.edu)
- TAKE IT DOWN Act(congress.gov).gov
- NCSL - AI 2024 Legislation(ncsl.org)
- Louisiana Act 782 (HB 119, 2026) - The Ivy Daniels Act, enrolled(legis.la.gov)
- Louisiana Act 806 (HB 459, 2026) - AI disclosures on electioneering communications, enrolled(legis.la.gov)
- Louisiana Act 806 (HB 459) resume digest(legis.la.gov)
- Louisiana HB 459 (2026 Regular Session) bill history(legis.la.gov)