EnglishEspañol
Indiana flag

Indiana

Indiana Trade Secret Laws: UTSA, Remedies & Deadlines

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Indiana Trade Secret Laws: UTSA, Remedies & Deadlines

Frequently Asked Questions

What qualifies as a trade secret under Indiana law?

Under Ind. Code § 24-2-3-2, information qualifies as a trade secret if it has independent economic value from not being generally known or readily ascertainable by those who could profit from it, and if the owner takes reasonable steps to maintain its secrecy. Formulas, software, customer lists, pricing strategies, and manufacturing processes can all qualify when both elements are satisfied.

How long do I have to sue for trade secret misappropriation in Indiana?

Ind. Code § 24-2-3-7 sets a three-year limitations period. The clock starts when the misappropriation was discovered or, through reasonable diligence, when it should have been discovered. Continuing misappropriation is treated as a single claim starting from the first discoverable act, so delay in filing can forfeit otherwise valid claims.

What damages can I recover in an Indiana trade secret case?

A prevailing plaintiff may recover actual losses plus unjust enrichment, or a reasonable royalty when neither damages nor unjust enrichment are provable, for no longer than the period the use could have been prohibited. Willful and malicious misappropriation can yield exemplary damages up to twice the award for actual loss and unjust enrichment under Ind. Code § 24-2-3-4(a). Attorney fees are available for willful and malicious misappropriation or bad-faith claims. Courts may also issue injunctions to stop ongoing or threatened misappropriation.

Do NDAs and reasonable security measures affect Indiana trade secret protection?

Yes. Reasonable efforts to maintain secrecy are a required element of the trade secret definition under Ind. Code § 24-2-3-2. Non-disclosure agreements, access controls, password protection, and employee training all support the reasonableness showing. Businesses that fail to implement meaningful protections risk having a court find that the information did not qualify as a trade secret, regardless of its commercial sensitivity.

Should I plead both the Indiana Uniform Trade Secrets Act and the federal DTSA?

In most cases, yes. The DTSA provides access to federal court and adds tools such as ex parte seizure that are not available under state law alone. The IUTSA supplies parallel state remedies, and the DTSA does not preempt Indiana law. Because both carry the same three-year limitations period, there is generally no timing disadvantage to pleading both. Consult Indiana counsel to determine the best approach for your situation.

Updates

Corrected Indiana’s definition citations and reverse-engineering attribution, attorney-fee grounds, and royalty prerequisites.

Corrected the Indiana trade-secret preemption citation from Ind. Code section 24-2-3-8 (a narrow pre-1982 transitional clause) to the actual displacement provision, section 24-2-3-1(c).

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Indiana Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Ind. Code §§ 24-2-3-1 to 24-2-3-8(iga.in.gov).gov
  2. Defend Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1836-1839(law.cornell.edu)
  3. Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Uniform Law Commission)(uniformlaws.org)
  4. Economic Espionage Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1831-1832(law.cornell.edu)
  5. Definitions(iga.in.gov).gov
  6. Damages for misappropriation and unjust enrichment; royalty; exemplary damages(iga.in.gov).gov
  7. Attorney's fees; conditions(iga.in.gov).gov
Share: