Alaska Trade Secret Laws: UTSA, Remedies & Deadlines

Alaska's trade secret statute, the Alaska Uniform Trade Secrets Act, is codified at Alaska Stat. §§ 45.50.910 to 45.50.945 (enacted 1988) and closely follows the Uniform Trade Secrets Act framework. The civil limitations period is three years from discovery of the misappropriation.

This guide is part of our Trade Secret Laws by State series.

Information last verified on 2026-06-25. This article presents general legal information, not legal advice. This guide covers civil trade-secret protection in Alaska under Alaska Stat. §§ 45.50.910 to 45.50.945 and the federal DTSA; for other jurisdictions see the full Trade Secret Laws by State index.

Does Alaska have a trade secret law?

Yes. Alaska enacted the Alaska Uniform Trade Secrets Act in 1988, codified at Alaska Stat. §§ 45.50.910 to 45.50.945 (Alaska State Legislature, akleg.gov). The statute is modeled on the Uniform Trade Secrets Act published by the Uniform Law Commission and provides a civil cause of action for misappropriation of qualifying confidential business information. Alaska's law displaces conflicting civil claims based on the same misappropriation conduct (Alaska Stat. § 45.50.930), while preserving contract remedies, criminal liability, and civil claims not grounded in misappropriation. The federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1836-1839 (2016), also applies when an Alaska trade secret relates to a product or service used in or intended for use in interstate or foreign commerce. Federal law does not preempt Alaska's statute (18 U.S.C. § 1838), so state and federal claims may proceed in the same action.

What counts as a trade secret and misappropriation in Alaska?

Under Alaska Stat. § 45.50.940, a trade secret is information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that:

1. Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and
2. Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy.

Both prongs must be satisfied. Courts look for concrete protective measures such as non-disclosure agreements, access restrictions, confidentiality policies, and security controls. Information shared freely without restrictions, or that appears in publicly available sources, typically cannot qualify.

Misappropriation under Alaska Stat. § 45.50.940 means either: (a) acquisition of a trade secret by a person who knows or has reason to know it was acquired by improper means; or (b) disclosure or use of a trade secret without consent by a person who acquired it through improper means, who breached a duty of confidentiality, or who derived it from someone who did so.

Reverse engineering and independent development are proper means of acquisition and are lawful under Alaska law. A competitor who independently arrives at the same formula or process, without using the plaintiff's protected information, has not committed misappropriation under the Alaska Uniform Trade Secrets Act.

Remedies and the limitations period in Alaska

Limitations period: Alaska Stat. § 45.50.925 sets a three-year limitations period from the date the misappropriation was discovered, or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should have been discovered. Continuing misappropriation constitutes a single claim, with the period beginning at the time of the first act the owner knew or should have known about. Alaska's three-year window matches the UTSA model and the federal DTSA period.

Injunctive relief: Courts may issue injunctions to prevent actual or threatened misappropriation under the Alaska Uniform Trade Secrets Act. If the court determines that prohibiting future use would be unreasonable, an injunction may condition future use on a reasonable royalty for no longer than the period the use could have been prohibited (Alaska Stat. § 45.50.910(b)).

Damages: The Act permits recovery of actual loss caused by the misappropriation plus unjust enrichment not already captured in the actual-loss calculation. Alaska Stat. § 45.50.915 does not expressly provide a royalty as an alternative damages measure; the Act’s express royalty provision concerns future use under § 45.50.910(b).

Exemplary damages: For willful and malicious misappropriation, Alaska courts may award exemplary damages in an amount not exceeding twice the compensatory damages.

Attorney fees: The Alaska Uniform Trade Secrets Act does not contain a specific attorney-fee provision. Any fee request requires separate analysis under applicable court rules or other law; the DTSA has its own fee provision for federal claims.

How the federal DTSA applies in Alaska

The DTSA (18 U.S.C. §§ 1836-1839) took effect May 11, 2016, and provides a federal civil remedy when an Alaska trade secret relates to a product or service used in or intended for use in interstate or foreign commerce. Given Alaska's active fisheries, oil and gas, mining, and technology sectors, most commercial trade secret disputes in the state will support a concurrent DTSA claim alongside the state cause of action.

Key DTSA features relevant to Alaska businesses:

• Aligned limitations period: The DTSA's three-year window from discovery (18 U.S.C. § 1836(d)) matches Alaska's state period under Alaska Stat. § 45.50.925, so a timely state claim is also timely under federal law.
• Ex parte seizure: The DTSA authorizes courts to order the seizure of property to prevent propagation of the secret without prior notice to the defendant in extraordinary circumstances (18 U.S.C. § 1836(b)(2)). Alaska's statute does not include an equivalent provision.
• Comparable remedies: DTSA remedies (injunction, damages, exemplary up to 2x, attorney fees for willful and malicious) are governed by federal standards and should be assessed separately from Alaska’s statutory remedies.
• Whistleblower immunity and notice: Under 18 U.S.C. § 1833(b), an individual may disclose a trade secret in confidence to a government official or attorney for the purpose of reporting a suspected legal violation without civil or criminal liability. Employers must include written notice of this immunity in any agreement governing the use of a trade secret, including NDAs and employment agreements, signed or updated after May 11, 2016. Omitting this notice forfeits the right to seek exemplary damages and attorney fees under the DTSA against the person covered by that agreement.

Alaska businesses in extractive industries, technology, and fisheries-related operations should review post-2016 confidentiality agreements to confirm DTSA-compliant whistleblower language appears in each document.

This is general legal information, not legal advice. It describes Alaska trade-secret law under Alaska Stat. §§ 45.50.910 to 45.50.945 and the federal DTSA as of 2026-06-25 and does not address your specific facts. Trade-secret disputes are highly fact-specific and deadlines are strict. Consult an attorney licensed in Alaska before acting.

Related articles

• Trade Secret Laws by State
• Alabama Trade Secret Laws
• Arizona Trade Secret Laws
• Is AI-generated code copyright infringement?

Last updated: 2026-06-25.