Nevada
Nevada Squatters Rights and Adverse Possession Laws (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 18, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 18, 2026. How we verify our legal content

Nevada sets a 5-year adverse possession period under NRS 11.070, and NRS 11.150 adds a tax-payment condition. NRS 11.150 conditions that tax requirement on also satisfying NRS 11.120 or NRS 11.140, the two sections that define what counts as possession for claims founded on a written instrument and for claims not founded on one, so the tax requirement reaches both branches of a Nevada adverse possession claim. Nevada also provides a summary eviction process and criminal unlawful-occupancy statutes that give property owners direct enforcement tools.
Information last verified on May 27, 2026. This article provides general legal information, not legal advice.
Jurisdiction scope: This article covers Nevada state law only, including NRS Chapter 11 (adverse possession), NRS Chapter 40 (summary eviction), and NRS 205.0813 and NRS 205.0817 (criminal unlawful occupancy). For a comparison of all 50 states, see the national squatters rights guide.
Adverse Possession in Nevada: Period, Taxes, and Elements
Nevada's adverse possession framework involves several statutes. NRS 11.070 establishes the baseline 5-year limitation period. NRS 11.110 addresses what happens when a claimant possesses under color of title. NRS 11.150 imposes a tax-payment condition, framed as applying "in addition to the requirements of NRS 11.120 or 11.140." Those two sections define what counts as possession: NRS 11.120 for a claim founded on a written instrument, judgment or decree (the color-of-title branch that NRS 11.110 governs), and NRS 11.140 for a claim not founded on a written instrument. Between them they cover both routes to adverse possession in Nevada, so the tax-payment condition applies to every claim.

NRS 11.070: The 5-Year Base Period
NRS 11.070 sets the limitation period for actions to recover real property. When a true owner fails to bring a recovery action within 5 years after the adverse claimant entered possession, the owner's right of action is time-barred. The occupant may then bring a quiet-title action to obtain a court declaration of ownership.
Nevada courts require the claimant to prove each of the standard adverse possession elements throughout the 5-year period:
Actual possession. The claimant must physically occupy and use the land in a manner appropriate to its character. Grading, fencing, landscaping, or constructing improvements on a vacant lot satisfies this element. Mere occasional visits do not.
Open and notorious possession. The occupation must be visible to a reasonable property owner who inspects the land. Hidden or concealed use does not give the true owner constructive notice and cannot support a claim.
Exclusive possession. The claimant must control the property to the exclusion of the true owner and the general public. Sharing use with strangers or the owner defeats exclusivity.
Hostile possession. The occupant must hold without the owner's permission. Possession under a lease, license, or express consent is not hostile and cannot ripen into adverse possession. Nevada courts apply an objective standard: the claimant must act as an owner would act, without the true owner's authorization.
Continuous possession. The claimant must maintain uninterrupted possession for the entire 5-year period. Tacking, adding together successive periods of possession held by persons in privity with one another, is available in Nevada. When tacking, each possessor in the chain must satisfy the same elements, and the aggregate period must reach 5 years.
NRS 11.110: Color of Title
NRS 11.110 addresses adverse possession held under color of title, meaning the claimant holds a written instrument such as a defective deed or a deed covering only part of the land actually claimed that purports to convey title but is legally insufficient to do so. Possession under color of title allows the claimant to assert constructive possession of the full parcel described in the instrument, even if only a portion has been physically occupied. This is significant for boundary disputes where a deed describes more land than the claimant has actually farmed or fenced.
Critically, NRS 11.110 does not eliminate or reduce the 5-year period. It supplements NRS 11.070 by defining the extent of the claim, not the length of time required to ripen it. NRS 11.150 conditions its tax-payment requirement on satisfying NRS 11.120 or NRS 11.140, and NRS 11.120 is the section that defines possession for exactly the written-instrument claims NRS 11.110 governs. A color-of-title claimant therefore has to satisfy the tax-payment requirement as well.
NRS 11.150: Mandatory Tax Payment in Every Case
NRS 11.150 adds a distinctive requirement to Nevada adverse possession law. Its text states that adverse possession is not established unless, in addition to satisfying NRS 11.120 or NRS 11.140, the claimant has occupied the premises continuously for 5 years and has paid all taxes levied or assessed against the property during that period.

Because NRS 11.120 and NRS 11.140 between them define possession for both written-instrument and non-written-instrument claims, this is an exception-free rule in practice. A claimant who occupies for 5 years but pays no taxes acquires nothing. A claimant who pays taxes for 4 years and misses 1 year fails the requirement. The Nevada Supreme Court and district courts have consistently held that both elements, continuous 5-year possession and continuous 5-year tax payment, must be proven simultaneously.
For practical purposes, this means a squatter who has not been paying property taxes is in a fundamentally weaker legal position in Nevada than in most other states. The true owner can defeat a potential adverse possession claim simply by demonstrating the claimant paid no taxes, without needing to prove a gap in possession.
Watch out: Property owners who discover a squatter should contact the county assessor's office immediately to confirm who has been paying taxes on the parcel. If only the true owner has paid, the squatter cannot establish the NRS 11.150 element regardless of how long they have occupied.
Elements Summary Table
| Element | Statute | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 5-year limitation period | NRS 11.070 | Clock runs from date of adverse entry |
| Color of title (constructive possession) | NRS 11.110 | Extends claim to full deed description |
| Continuous tax payment | NRS 11.150 | Applies in addition to NRS 11.120 (written-instrument claims) or NRS 11.140 (claims without a written instrument) |
| Actual, open, notorious, exclusive, hostile, continuous | Common-law elements (Nevada case law) | Must be proven for full 5-year period |
How to Remove a Squatter in Nevada
Nevada provides property owners with two distinct pathways to remove an unauthorized occupant: a civil summary eviction process under NRS Chapter 40, and a criminal enforcement route under NRS 205.0813 and NRS 205.0817. Both can operate in parallel.

Step 1: Know the Narrow Self-Help Exception
As a general rule, Nevada law prohibits self-help eviction. Changing locks, removing a squatter's belongings, cutting off utilities, or physically removing the occupant without a court order exposes the property owner to civil liability, including potential treble damages.
Nevada does provide one squatter-specific exception. Under NRS 40.412, when all known unlawful or unauthorized adult occupants of a dwelling have been arrested for housebreaking or unlawful occupancy and all minor occupants have been taken into State custody, the owner may retake possession and change the locks without a court order. The exception is conditional and procedural:
- The owner must post a written notice on the dwelling identifying the address, the court with jurisdiction, and the date possession was taken or the locks were changed.
- The notice must tell the occupant that reentry without a court order is a criminal offense and that the occupant may contest the matter by filing a verified complaint for reentry with the court within 21 calendar days.
- The notice must stay posted for at least 21 calendar days, and a copy must be filed with the court no later than 1 day after the locks are changed.
- The owner must safely store the occupant's personal property and may dispose of it only after the 21-day window passes without an affidavit or notice of hearing under NRS 40.414.
- NRS 40.412 does not apply if any unlawful or unauthorized occupant is still occupying the dwelling.
Outside that narrow situation, the owner must use the court process described below.
Step 2: Civil Removal Under NRS 40.414 or NRS 40.253
NRS 40.253, as written, applies to 'the tenant of any dwelling... in default in payment of the rent' -- it presupposes an existing landlord-tenant relationship, not a squatter who never had a rental agreement. Its notice period runs to the close of business on the seventh judicial day after service (or, for certain short-term weekly tenancies under 45 days, by noon of the fourth full day), not 5 days. For a squatter with no tenancy at all, the applicable civil procedure is NRS 40.414, not NRS 40.253.
Under NRS 40.414, when a person guilty of forcible entry or forcible detainer fails to surrender the property after a written notice to surrender served under NRS 40.230 or NRS 40.240 and NRS 40.280, the owner may seek to recover possession. That notice must identify the court with jurisdiction and advise the unlawful or unauthorized occupant of the right to contest the matter by filing an affidavit before the court's close of business on the fourth judicial day after service. The owner then applies by affidavit of complaint for eviction to the justice court of the township, or the district court of the county, where the property is located.
If the occupant files no timely affidavit and the complaint shows a forcible entry or forcible detainer, the court must order the sheriff or constable to remove the occupant within 24 hours of receiving the order. If the occupant does file an affidavit that raises an element of a legal defense, the court must hold a hearing within 7 judicial days. NRS 40.412 and NRS 40.414 are the civil counterparts to the criminal statutes in Step 3, and they are written for exactly the occupant who never had a tenancy.
If a tenant covered by NRS 40.253 does not vacate within the statutory notice period, the landlord files an eviction complaint in the Justice Court for the township where the property is located. Under NRS 40.253(5) and NRS 40.254, the court schedules a summary hearing. At the hearing, the landlord presents evidence supporting the unlawful detainer. If the court agrees, it issues a judgment of unlawful detainer.
Once the court issues the order, the constable or sheriff serves the occupant a 24-hour notice to vacate. If the occupant still does not leave, the constable or sheriff executes a lockout. The entire process, from initial notice to physical removal, can take as little as one to two weeks when the occupant does not contest the action or does not appear at the hearing.
If the squatter contests the eviction and claims adverse possession as a defense, the matter may require a more formal evidentiary hearing. At that stage, the owner's best response is to demonstrate, through county tax records and the absence of a deed or lease, that the squatter has not satisfied NRS 11.150.
Step 3: The Criminal Unlawful-Occupancy Route Under NRS 205.0813 and NRS 205.0817
Nevada enacted criminal anti-squatting statutes in 2015. NRS 205.0813 addresses housebreaking: a person who forcibly enters an uninhabited or vacant dwelling, knowing or having reason to believe the entry is without the owner's permission, with intent to take up or provide residence there, is guilty of housebreaking. NRS 205.0817 covers unlawful occupancy: a person who takes up residence in an uninhabited or vacant dwelling, knowing or having reason to believe the residency is without the owner's permission, is guilty of unlawful occupancy. Both are crimes, so law enforcement can investigate and arrest without first obtaining a civil court order. A related section, NRS 205.082, makes it a gross misdemeanor for an occupant to reenter the property, without a court order or the owner's permission, after the owner has recovered possession under NRS 40.412 or NRS 40.414.
The practical significance of these statutes is that a property owner who can document ownership and the absence of any tenancy or permission can contact local law enforcement and request that officers proceed under NRS 205.0813 or NRS 205.0817. The statutes are intended to address the scenario where a squatter has entered a vacant home, changed the locks, and is resisting removal.
Key considerations when using the criminal route:
- The owner should bring documentary proof of ownership (deed or title insurance policy) and an affidavit that no tenancy was ever created.
- Law enforcement retains discretion in how they respond. Some departments treat the matter as civil and defer to the summary eviction process; others act promptly under the criminal statutes.
- A property owner may pursue both the criminal complaint and the civil summary eviction simultaneously. Filing the civil action protects the owner's rights if law enforcement declines to act immediately.
2023 and 2025 Legislative Sessions
Nevada's 82nd and 83rd Legislative Sessions (2023 and 2025) did not produce a dedicated expedited administrative squatter-removal law comparable to those enacted in Florida (2024) or several other states. The Nevada Legislature meets in regular session only in odd-numbered years, so there was no 2024 regular session. As of May 2026, the owner-recovery procedures under NRS 40.412 and NRS 40.414, the summary eviction procedure under NRS 40.253, and the criminal statutes under NRS 205.0813 and NRS 205.0817 remain the removal tools available to Nevada property owners.
Legal disclaimer: The information on this page is a general summary of Nevada law as of May 2026. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Adverse possession and eviction law involve fact-specific analyses, and outcomes depend on the particular circumstances of each situation. Consult a licensed Nevada real estate attorney for advice on your specific case.
Return to the national squatters rights guide
Published by RecordingLaw.com. For general legal information only. Not legal advice.
More Nevada Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does a squatter have to stay in Nevada to claim adverse possession?
A squatter must occupy continuously for 5 years under NRS 11.070, and NRS 11.150 adds a requirement to pay all property taxes assessed on the land during that same 5-year period. NRS 11.150 applies that tax requirement on top of NRS 11.120 or NRS 11.140, which together cover both written-instrument and non-written-instrument claims, so a squatter who occupies for 5 years but pays no taxes cannot claim adverse possession in Nevada.
Does Nevada require squatters to pay property taxes to claim adverse possession?
Yes. NRS 11.150 requires the claimant to have paid all taxes levied or assessed against the property throughout the 5-year possession period, or to have tendered payment. It applies that condition in addition to NRS 11.120 (claims founded on a written instrument or judgment) or NRS 11.140 (claims not founded on a written instrument), which together cover every Nevada adverse possession claim, so there is no route around the tax requirement.
What is the fastest way to remove a squatter in Nevada?
For a true squatter with no tenancy of any kind, the civil route is NRS 40.414: serve a written notice to surrender, then apply by affidavit of complaint for eviction, after which the court can order the sheriff or constable to remove the occupant within 24 hours. Owners often pursue that alongside criminal unlawful-occupancy charges under NRS 205.0813 and NRS 205.0817. NRS 40.253's summary eviction process is triggered by an existing tenant's default in rent payment, so it does not fit a squatter who never had a rental agreement.
What are NRS 205.0813 and NRS 205.0817?
These are Nevada's criminal anti-squatting statutes enacted in 2015. NRS 205.0813 makes it a crime to forcibly enter an uninhabited or vacant dwelling, knowing or having reason to believe the entry is unauthorized, with intent to take up or provide residence there (housebreaking). NRS 205.0817 makes it a crime to take up residence in an uninhabited or vacant dwelling knowing or having reason to believe the residency is without the owner's permission (unlawful occupancy). Because both are criminal offenses, police can respond to a squatting complaint without waiting for a civil court order. A related section, NRS 205.082, makes reentry after the owner lawfully recovers possession a gross misdemeanor.
Can I change the locks on a Nevada property to remove a squatter?
Usually no, but Nevada has one squatter-specific exception. NRS 40.412 lets an owner retake possession and change the locks without a court order once all known unlawful or unauthorized adult occupants have been arrested for housebreaking or unlawful occupancy and all minor occupants are in State custody, provided the owner posts the required written notice for at least 21 calendar days, files a copy with the court within 1 day, and safely stores the occupant's belongings. It does not apply while any unauthorized occupant is still in the dwelling. Outside that situation, changing locks, removing belongings, or cutting off utilities can expose you to civil liability, and you should use NRS 40.414 for an occupant with no tenancy or NRS 40.253 and NRS 40.254 if a landlord-tenant relationship exists.
What does color of title mean in Nevada adverse possession?
Color of title under NRS 11.110 means the claimant holds a written instrument, such as a defective deed, that purports to convey title but is legally insufficient to do so. A claimant with color of title can assert constructive possession over the full parcel described in the instrument, even if only part of it has been physically occupied. The 5-year period is not shortened by color of title. NRS 11.120 defines what counts as possession for these written-instrument claims, and NRS 11.150 applies its tax-payment condition to claims satisfying NRS 11.120, so a color-of-title claimant must still pay all taxes for the full 5 years.
Did Nevada pass a new squatter removal law recently?
No. Nevada's Legislature meets in regular session only in odd-numbered years, and neither the 82nd (2023) nor the 83rd (2025) session produced a new dedicated expedited administrative squatter-removal law. As of May 2026, the operative tools remain the owner-recovery provisions in NRS 40.412 and NRS 40.414, the summary eviction process under NRS 40.253 and NRS 40.254, and the criminal unlawful-occupancy statutes under NRS 205.0813 and NRS 205.0817, which have been in force since 2015.
Updates
Removed a citation to a nonexistent statute (NRS 205.0819), added Nevada’s owner-recovery provisions NRS 40.412 (retaking possession and changing locks after arrests, with 21-day notice) and NRS 40.414 (court-ordered removal within 24 hours for an occupant who never had a tenancy), resolved the tax-payment question by reading NRS 11.120 and NRS 11.140, and corrected a section heading that referred to a 2024 legislative session Nevada does not hold.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected three errors: (1) NRS 11.150's tax-payment condition is tied by its own text to NRS 11.120/11.140, not stated to apply universally regardless of NRS 11.070/11.110; (2) NRS 40.253's summary eviction process applies to a tenant in default of rent, not a squatter with no tenancy, and its notice period is not 5 days; (3) NRS 205.0813 (housebreaking) and NRS 205.0817 (unlawful occupancy) were swapped throughout the article and in the Sources list.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Nevada Revised Statutes, Chapter 011: LIMITATION OF ACTIONS
§ 11.150Additional requirements for adverse possession: Occupation continuously for 5 years; payment of taxes.In force
In no case shall adverse possession be considered established unless it be shown, in addition to the requirements of NRS 11.120 or 11.140, that the land has been occupied and claimed for the period of 5 years, continuously, and that the party or persons, their predecessors and grantors have paid all taxes, state, county and municipal, which may have been levied and assessed against the land for the period mentioned, or have tendered payment thereof.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-08 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.nv.us
Cited in 15 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Potts required taxes on the land claimed. Crumbaker accepted timely tax tender after a mortgage relationship was openly repudiated. Horgan rejected easement extinguishment without five years of continuous adverse use. White Pine applied a 15-year period to a landowner's takings claim.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Potts v. Vokits (Nevada Supreme Court 1985, 101 Nev. 90)✓The court reversed adverse-possession title to 33,930 square feet because Smith had paid taxes only on his 8,061-square-foot record parcel; payment of taxes assessed against the land claimed is mandatory under NRS 11.150.
- White Pine Lumber Co. v. City of Reno (Nevada Supreme Court 1990, 106 Nev. 778)✓In the landowner's takings action, the court selected NRS 40.090's 15-year period rather than NRS 11.150's five-year track, which applies only when an adverse possessor has paid taxes throughout the period.
- Crumbaker v. Kelly (Nevada Supreme Court 1979, 95 Nev. 743)✓Mortgagees could possess adversely after acts of dominion gave the mortgagors actual notice that the mortgage relationship had been repudiated; NRS 11.150 applied against the known claimants, and timely tender of taxes satisfied the statute.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 11.070No cause of action effectual unless party or predecessor seized or possessed within 5 years.In force
No cause of action or defense to an action, founded upon the title to real property, or to rents or to services out of the same, shall be effectual, unless it appears that the person prosecuting the action or making the defense, or under whose title the action is prosecuted or the defense is made, or the ancestor, predecessor, or grantor of such person, was seized or possessed of the premises in question within 5 years before the committing of the act in respect to which said action is prosecuted or defense made.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.nv.us
Cited in 40 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Lanigir v. Arden (Nevada Supreme Court 1966, 82 Nev. 28)“…ossession whether claiming under NRS 11.120, NRS 11.140 and NRS 11.070, or NRS 40.090; O’Banion v. Simpson,…”
- U.S. BANK N.A. v. THUNDER PROPERTIES, INC. (NRAP 5) (Nevada Supreme Court 2022, 2022 NV 3)“…that the quiet title actions addressed in NRS 11.070 or NRS 11.080 are analogous. These prov…”
- Bissell v. College Development Co. (Nevada Supreme Court 1970, 86 Nev. 404)“…atherine Harvey. *407 2. The Statute of Limitations. NRS 11.070 provides: “No cause of action or defe…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 11.110Occupation under written instrument or judgment; when deemed adverse.In force
Whenever it shall appear that the occupant, or those under whom the occupant claims, entered into the possession of premises, under claim of title, exclusive of any other right, founding such claim upon a written instrument as being a conveyance of the premises in question, or upon the decree or judgment of a competent court, and that there has been a continued occupation and possession of the premises included in such instrument, decree, or judgment, or of some part of such premises, under such claim, for 5 years, the premises so included shall be deemed to have been held adversely, except that where the premises so included consists of a tract divided into lots, the possession of one lot shall not be deemed a possession of any other lot of the same tract.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.nv.us
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2009
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- 25 Corp. v. Eisenman Chemical Co. (Nevada Supreme Court 1985, 101 Nev. 664)“…ent as being a conveyance of the premises in question. ...” NRS 11.110. 25 Corporation argues that the undis…”
- Potts v. Vokits (Nevada Supreme Court 1985, 101 Nev. 90)“…under two separate sections of the Nevada Revised Statutes. NRS 11.110 through NRS 11.150 allow a party to ass…”
- Triplett v. David H. Fulstone Co. (Nevada Supreme Court 1993, 109 Nev. 216)“…uring livestock, hunting, and woodcutting. See NRS 11.110-.140. Finally, Fulstones have paid taxe…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Nevada Revised Statutes, Chapter 205: CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY
§ 205.0817Unlawful occupancy; penalty.In force
1. A person who takes up residence in an uninhabited or vacant dwelling and knows or has reason to believe that such residency is without permission of the owner of the dwelling or an authorized representative of the owner is guilty of unlawful occupancy. 2. A person is presumed to know that the residency described in subsection 1 is without the permission of the owner of the dwelling or an authorized representative of the owner unless the person provides a written rental agreement that: (a) Is notarized or is signed by an authorized agent of the owner who at the time of signing holds a permit to engage in property management pursuant to chapter 645 of NRS; and (b) Includes the current address and telephone number of the owner or his or her authorized representative. 3. A person convicted of unlawful occupancy is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. A person convicted of unlawful occupancy and who has been convicted three or more times of unlawful occupancy is guilty of a category D felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 193.130.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.nv.us
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Cope v. State of Nevada (District Court, D. Nevada 2020)“…NRS 205.0817 states that:…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 205.0813Housebreaking; penalty.In force
1. A person who forcibly enters an uninhabited or vacant dwelling, knows or has reason to believe that such entry is without permission of the owner of the dwelling or an authorized representative of the owner and has the intent to take up residence or provide a residency to another therein is guilty of housebreaking. 2. A person is presumed to know that an entry described in subsection 1 is without the permission of the owner of the dwelling or an authorized representative of the owner unless the person provides a written rental agreement that: (a) Is notarized or is signed by an authorized agent of the owner who at the time of signing holds a permit to engage in property management pursuant to chapter 645 of NRS; and (b) Includes the current address and telephone number of the owner or his or her authorized representative. 3. A person convicted of housebreaking is guilty of: (a) For a first offense, a gross misdemeanor; and (b) For a second and any subsequent offense, a category D felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 193.130.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.nv.us
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- AUSTIN (JOSEPH) v. STATE (CRIMINAL) (Court of Appeals of Nevada 2026, 142 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 12)“…by implication by the 2015 enactment of NRS 205.0813, that argument was f…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Nevada Revised Statutes, Chapter 040: ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS IN PARTICULAR CASES CONCERNING PROPERTY
§ 40.253Unlawful detainer: Supplemental remedy of summary eviction and exclusion of tenant for default in payment of rent.In force
1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 12, in addition to the remedy provided in NRS 40.2512 and 40.290 to 40.420, inclusive, when the tenant of any dwelling, apartment, mobile home or recreational vehicle with periodic rent reserved by the month or any shorter period is in default in payment of the rent, the landlord or the landlord’s agent may cause to be served a notice in writing, requiring in the alternative the payment of the rent or the surrender of the premises: (a) Before the close of business on the seventh judicial day following the day of service; or (b) If the landlord chooses not to proceed in the manner set forth in paragraph (a) and the rent is reserved by a period of 1 week or less and the tenancy has not continued for more than 45 days, at or before noon of the fourth full day following the day of service. Ê As used in this subsection, “day of service” means the day the landlord or the landlord’s agent personally delivers the notice to the tenant.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.nv.us
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Anvui, LLC v. G.L. Dragon, LLC (Nevada Supreme Court 2007, 123 Nev. 212)“…Gibbons, J.: In this appeal, we consider whether, in an NRS 40.253(6) summary eviction proceeding, appella…”
- G.C. Wallace, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court ex rel. County of Clark (Nevada Supreme Court 2011, 127 Nev. 701)“…landlord who seeks summary eviction in justice court under NRS 40.253 1 against a tenant is precluded from s…”
- Justice of the Peace Lippis v. Peters (Nevada Supreme Court 1996, 112 Nev. 1008)“…ion proceedings; (2) declared the summary eviction statute (NRS 40.253) to be unconstitutional; (3) enjoined t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 40.254Unlawful detainer: Supplemental remedy of summary eviction and exclusion of tenant from certain types of property.In force
1. Except as otherwise provided by specific statute, in addition to the remedy provided in NRS 40.290 to 40.420, inclusive, when the tenant of a dwelling unit, part of a low-rent housing program operated by a public housing authority, a mobile home or a recreational vehicle is guilty of an unlawful detainer pursuant to NRS 40.250, 40.251, 40.2514 or 40.2516, the landlord or the landlord’s agent may utilize the summary procedures for eviction as provided in NRS 40.253 except that written notice to surrender the premises must: (a) Be given to the tenant in accordance with the provisions of NRS 40.280; (b) Advise the tenant of the court that has jurisdiction over the matter; and (c) Advise the tenant of the tenant’s right to: (1) Contest the notice by filing before the court’s close of business on the fifth judicial day after the day of service of the notice an affidavit with the court that has jurisdiction over the matter stating the reasons why the tenant is not guilty of an unlawful detainer; or (2) Request that the court stay the execution of the order for removal of the tenant or order providing for nonadmittance of the tenant for a period not exceeding 10…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at leg.state.nv.us
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2013
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Davidsohn v. Doyle (Nevada Supreme Court 1992, 108 Nev. 145)“…han those mentioned in NRS 40.250 to 40.252, inclusive, and NRS 40.254, and after notice in writing,…”
- Walker v. Dist. Ct. (Powerhouse Platinum Realty) (Nevada Supreme Court 2013)“…as the previous landlord, as defined in NRS Chapter 118A); NRS 40.254 (authorizing a summary eviction action…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- NRS 11.070 - Limitation on action for recovery of real property (5-year period)(leg.state.nv.us)
- NRS 11.110 - Adverse possession under color of title(leg.state.nv.us)
- NRS 11.150 - Adverse possession: Tax payment required(leg.state.nv.us)
- NRS 40.253 - Summary eviction: Unlawful detainer(leg.state.nv.us)
- NRS 40.254 - Summary eviction: Hearing and order(leg.state.nv.us)
- NRS 205.0813 - Housebreaking(leg.state.nv.us)
- NRS 205.0817 - Unlawful occupancy of dwelling(leg.state.nv.us)
- NRS 205.0819 - Unlawful occupancy: Law enforcement authority(leg.state.nv.us)
- NRS 11.120 - What constitutes adverse possession under written instrument or judgment(leg.state.nv.us)
- NRS 11.140 - What constitutes adverse possession under claim of title not founded on written instrument(leg.state.nv.us)
- NRS 40.412 - Housebreaking and unlawful occupancy: When owner may retake possession and change locks; notice required(leg.state.nv.us)
- NRS 40.414 - Forcible entry or forcible detainer: When owner or occupant may recover possession; notice required; complaint for eviction(leg.state.nv.us)
- NRS 205.082 - Unlawful reentry; penalty(leg.state.nv.us)