Hawaii
Hawaii Public Records Laws: The UIPA (HRS Chapter 92F) Explained
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 4, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Hawaii's public records law is the Uniform Information Practices Act (Modified), Haw. Rev. Stat. chapter 92F. Any person may request, an agency generally has 10 business days to act, and Hawaii is one of the few states with a genuine public-interest fee waiver written into its rules.
Information last verified on 2026-08-04. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
This page covers Hawaii state law only. For records held by a federal agency, see our guide on how to file a FOIA request. To compare Hawaii against other states, start at the public records laws by state hub.
The Uniform Information Practices Act
Hawaii's records law is the Uniform Information Practices Act (Modified), codified at Haw. Rev. Stat. chapter 92F. It governs records held by state departments, the counties, boards and commissions, and other government agencies in Hawaii.
The modified in the name is not decoration. Hawaii adapted a uniform model act, and one of the results is that UIPA does two distinct jobs in one statute. It provides general public access to government records, and it separately provides an individual with access to a personal record about that individual, along with a right to request correction of it. Which pathway you are on affects which exemptions the agency can invoke, and the Office of Information Practices analyzes them separately.
That means it is worth being explicit in your request about which one you are using. If you are asking for a record about yourself, say so. If you are asking for a government record generally, say that. A request that does not distinguish them can get analyzed only under the narrower framework.
Hawaii also differs from most states in having a permanent agency dedicated to this law. The Office of Information Practices, established within the Department of Accounting and General Services for administrative purposes under Haw. Rev. Stat. 92F-41, administers UIPA, writes the implementing rules, issues opinions, and hears appeals. The comptroller has no power to supervise or control OIP in its quasi-judicial functions, so the office decides appeals independently of the department it is attached to. Where most states leave requesters with only a courthouse, Hawaii has an office whose job is this statute.
Who Can Request Records in Hawaii
Any person may request. UIPA defines person to include an individual, corporation, government, or governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association, or any other legal entity.
There is no residency requirement and no citizenship requirement. A mainland journalist, an out-of-state business, and a Honolulu resident all have the same standing to file. Hawaii is squarely on the open side of the residency divide, unlike Kentucky.
Hawaii Public Records Deadlines
Hawaii's deadlines have an unusual home, and citing them wrongly is a common error.
The base statute, chapter 92F, does not spell out the response deadline as a number of days. The day counts come from Hawaii Administrative Rules chapter 2-71, the rules the Office of Information Practices adopted to implement UIPA. So a request letter that cites 92F-11 for a 10-day deadline is citing the wrong instrument. Cite the administrative rule.
Under HAR chapter 2-71, the structure is:
- The agency has 10 business days to disclose the record in full, or, where segregation or redaction is needed, to provide a notice under HAR section 2-71-14 explaining what it will do.
- After that notice, or after receiving any required prepayment, the agency has 5 more business days to actually disclose.
- In extenuating circumstances, the agency may instead send a written acknowledgment within 10 business days, followed by the full notice within a reasonable time not to exceed 20 business days from the date the agency received the request.
Notice what that means in practice. The 10-business-day figure is usually a deadline to act rather than a guarantee of delivery, and the realistic full timeline for anything requiring redaction runs to about 15 business days, or longer if extenuating circumstances are invoked. These provisions are current as of August 2026.
What Hawaii Records Requests Cost
Hawaii sets specific rates in HAR section 2-71-31, which is more transparency than most states offer.
- Searching for the record: $2.50 per 15 minutes or fraction of 15 minutes.
- Review and segregation of the record: $5.00 per 15 minutes or fraction of 15 minutes.
- The agency shall not assess the first $30 in total of those two categories combined.
Copying charges are separate from those search and review fees.
The $30 floor is doing real work. At $2.50 per quarter hour of search and $5.00 per quarter hour of review, $30 buys a meaningful amount of staff time, so a well-targeted request often ends up costing nothing beyond copying.
The Public-Interest Fee Waiver
This is where Hawaii stands out. Under HAR section 2-71-32, an agency shall waive $60 of the fees that may be assessed under section 2-71-31 when two conditions are met:
- The request for a waiver of fees is supported by a statement of facts.
- The agency finds that the waiver of fees would be in the public interest.
Section 2-71-32 does not leave public interest to argument. It supplies a three-part test, and all three parts have to be met: the requested record pertains to the operations or activities of government, the record is not readily available to the public through other means, and the requester has the intent and the ability to widely disseminate the information to the public.
Write your statement of facts against those three elements in order. A waiver request that argues newsworthiness in the abstract, without addressing availability or dissemination, is missing two thirds of the test.
Most states have no public-interest waiver at all, and readers routinely assume one exists everywhere because the federal FOIA has one. In Georgia, Kansas, Idaho, Kentucky, and Florida there is nothing comparable. Illinois is the exception among Hawaii's usual comparison set, since 5 ILCS 140/6(c) does provide a public-interest waiver. Hawaii genuinely has one, and it is written as a duty to waive when the conditions are met rather than as pure discretion.
Two practical points follow. The waiver is a fixed $60 rather than a full write-off, so it stacks on top of the $30 non-assessment rather than eliminating a large bill outright. And it is not automatic: you have to ask, and you have to supply a statement of facts explaining why disclosure serves the public interest. A one-line assertion that the public deserves to know is not a statement of facts. Name what the records would show, who benefits from knowing, and why.
How to File a UIPA Request
Requests go to the individual agency that holds the record. The Office of Information Practices publishes a standard request form, and using it is the cleanest route because it maps onto the rules the agency is following.
- Identify the agency. State departments and the four counties keep their own records.
- Use the OIP request form or a written letter.
- State whether you are seeking a government record generally or a personal record about yourself.
- Describe the records specifically. Because search is billed by the quarter hour with a $30 floor, precision has a direct effect on price.
- If cost is a concern, request the public-interest fee waiver in the same letter and include your statement of facts.
- Note the date sent. The 10-business-day clock runs from receipt.
Our free FOIA request generator produces a Hawaii-specific request citing UIPA. Nothing entered into it is stored or transmitted.
Exemptions Under UIPA
UIPA's general exemptions from public disclosure appear in Haw. Rev. Stat. 92F-13, and the personal-record access exceptions appear in 92F-22. They cover categories including records that would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, records pertaining to the prosecution or defense of an action to which the agency is or may be a party, government records that by their nature must be confidential to avoid frustrating a legitimate government function, records protected by other statute or court order, and inchoate and draft working papers.
Because Hawaii runs a dedicated records agency, the exemption case law here is unusually accessible. OIP publishes its formal and informal opinions, and they are searchable. If an agency cites an exemption you doubt, it is often worth checking whether OIP has addressed that exemption in a published opinion before escalating.
Police Records and Body Camera Footage
Hawaii has no body-worn camera statute. There is no dedicated provision naming who may view footage, no statutory viewing timeline, and no equivalent of Kansas's K.S.A. 45-254 or Kentucky's KRS 61.168.
The Office of Information Practices addressed this directly in Formal Opinion F22-01, issued in December 2021, and its conclusion is the right framework to work from. Body-worn camera recordings are analyzed under the general UIPA exemptions, and whether and to what extent they may be withheld must be determined on a case-by-case basis.
In that opinion, OIP found that the police department could deny personal-record access under Haw. Rev. Stat. 92F-22(1)(A), and general public access under 92F-13(1), to only the portions of body-worn camera recordings of statements by witnesses that would identify those witnesses. The word only matters. OIP's analysis was portion-specific rather than record-wide, which is the posture to hold an agency to: redaction of identifying material rather than blanket withholding of an entire recording.
Two consequences for a Hawaii requester. There is no automatic right to footage, so an agency denial is not necessarily improper. But there is also no categorical exemption, so an agency that withholds an entire recording without explaining why each portion is exempt is not applying the standard OIP set. That is exactly the kind of dispute the OIP appeal process is built to resolve, and it is free.
For 911 audio and dispatch records, see our page on whether 911 calls are public records.
Appealing a Denial to the Office of Information Practices
Hawaii's appeal path costs nothing and does not require a lawyer, which makes it the right first step in almost every case.
Under Haw. Rev. Stat. 92F-15.5, a person denied access may seek OIP review. The outcomes are set out plainly in the statute:
- If OIP's decision is to disclose, OIP notifies the person and the agency, and the agency shall make the record available.
- If the denial of access is upheld, in whole or in part, OIP notifies the person in writing of the decision, the reasons for it, and the right to bring a judicial action under 92F-15(a).
The legal weight of an OIP decision is worth stating precisely, because it is neither purely advisory nor flatly binding on a court. Under 92F-15(b), OIP opinions and rulings are admissible and shall be considered as precedent unless found to be palpably erroneous. That is strong deference. The one carve-out: in an action to compel disclosure brought by an aggrieved person after OIP upheld the agency's denial, the opinion upholding the denial is reviewed de novo.
Read that structure carefully, because it is favorable to requesters in an asymmetric way. An OIP ruling generally carries precedential weight, but the one situation where a court starts fresh is the situation where OIP ruled against the requester. Losing at OIP therefore does not lock in that result if you go to court.
If you do litigate and prevail, Haw. Rev. Stat. 92F-15(d) provides that the court shall assess against the agency reasonable attorney's fees and all other expenses reasonably incurred.
Records UIPA Does Not Reach
Birth, death, and marriage certificates are vital records held by the Hawaii Department of Health under a separate statutory scheme with eligibility limits on who may obtain a certified copy. They are not UIPA requests. Our Hawaii death records guide covers who qualifies and how to order.
Deeds and land records are recorded through the Bureau of Conveyances and the Land Court, covered in our Hawaii property records guide. Court case files and warrants are judiciary records governed by their own access rules; see Hawaii warrant search.
Related articles
Disclaimer
This article provides general legal information about Hawaii's Uniform Information Practices Act as of August 2026. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes, administrative rules, and fee schedules change. If a public records dispute affects your legal rights, consult an attorney licensed in Hawaii about your specific situation.
Last updated: 2026-08-04.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I have to live in Hawaii to file a UIPA request?
No. UIPA defines person broadly to include individuals, corporations, governments and their subdivisions or agencies, business trusts, estates, trusts, partnerships, associations, and other legal entities, with no residency requirement. An out-of-state requester has the same standing as a Hawaii resident.
How long does a Hawaii agency have to respond?
Under Hawaii Administrative Rules chapter 2-71, generally 10 business days to disclose in full or to provide a notice where segregation or redaction is needed, and then 5 more business days to disclose after that notice or after prepayment. In extenuating circumstances the agency may instead acknowledge in writing within 10 business days and provide the full notice within a reasonable time not to exceed 20 business days from receipt of the request.
Why do people cite the wrong statute for Hawaii's deadline?
Because the day counts are not in chapter 92F itself. They live in the administrative rules the Office of Information Practices adopted to implement UIPA, at Hawaii Administrative Rules chapter 2-71. Citing 92F-11 for a 10-business-day deadline points at the wrong instrument. Cite the rule.
How much does a Hawaii records request cost?
Under HAR section 2-71-31, searching is billed at $2.50 per 15 minutes or fraction thereof and review and segregation at $5.00 per 15 minutes or fraction thereof, but the agency may not assess the first $30 of those combined fees. Copying charges are separate. A well-targeted request often stays inside the $30 floor.
Does Hawaii really have a public-interest fee waiver?
Yes, and it is unusual. Under HAR section 2-71-32 an agency shall waive $60 of the fees assessable under section 2-71-31 when the waiver request is supported by a statement of facts and the agency finds the waiver would be in the public interest, which that rule defines as a three-part test: the record pertains to the operations or activities of government, it is not readily available to the public through other means, and the requester intends and is able to widely disseminate the information. It is a fixed $60 rather than a full write-off, it stacks on top of the $30 non-assessment, and you have to ask for it and supply the statement of facts.
What should my fee-waiver statement of facts say?
Write it against the three elements HAR section 2-71-32 uses to define the public interest, and address each with facts: that the record pertains to the operations or activities of government, that it is not readily available to the public through other means, and that you have the intent and the ability to widely disseminate the information to the public. An assertion that the public has a right to know, with nothing behind it, is not a statement of facts, and it addresses only one of the three parts.
Is an OIP decision binding on the agency?
If OIP decides the record should be disclosed, Haw. Rev. Stat. 92F-15.5(b) provides that the agency shall make the record available. On the broader question of legal weight, 92F-15(b) provides that OIP opinions and rulings are admissible and shall be considered as precedent unless found to be palpably erroneous, with one exception: in an action to compel disclosure brought after OIP upheld an agency denial, the opinion upholding the denial is reviewed de novo.
Does it hurt me to lose at OIP before going to court?
Less than you might expect. The de novo exception in 92F-15(b) applies precisely to the case where a requester sues after OIP upheld the agency's denial, so the court decides that question fresh rather than deferring to the OIP opinion against you.
Can I recover attorney fees if I sue and win?
Haw. Rev. Stat. 92F-15(d) provides that if the complainant prevails, the court shall assess against the agency reasonable attorney's fees and all other expenses reasonably incurred.
Can I get police body camera footage in Hawaii?
There is no Hawaii body camera statute. OIP Formal Opinion F22-01 holds that whether and to what extent body-worn camera recordings may be withheld must be determined case by case under the general UIPA exemptions. In that opinion OIP found the department could withhold only the portions of recordings of witness statements that would identify those witnesses, under Haw. Rev. Stat. 92F-22(1)(A) and 92F-13(1). An agency that withholds an entire recording without explaining why each portion is exempt is not applying that standard, and OIP review is free.
What is the difference between a government record request and a personal record request in Hawaii?
UIPA provides both general public access to government records and separate access for an individual to a personal record about that individual, with a right to request correction. Different exemption provisions apply to each, so state in your request which one you are using. If you want a record about yourself, say so explicitly.
Can I use a UIPA request to get a Hawaii birth or death certificate?
No. Vital records are held by the Hawaii Department of Health under a separate statutory scheme with eligibility limits on who may receive a certified copy. A UIPA request to an agency will not produce one.
Updates
Corrected the parent agency of the Office of Information Practices: it is established within the Department of Accounting and General Services under Haw. Rev. Stat. 92F-41, not the Department of the Attorney General.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 92F: UNIFORM INFORMATION PRACTICES ACT (MODIFIED)
§ 92F-11Affirmative agency disclosure responsibilitiesIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) All government records are open to public inspection unless access is restricted or closed by law. (b) Except as provided in section 92F-13, each agency upon request by any person shall make government records available for inspection and copying during regular business hours. (c) Unless the information is readily retrievable by the agency in the form in which it is requested, an agency shall not be required to prepare a compilation or summary of its records. (d) Each agency shall assure reasonable access to facilities for duplicating records and for making memoranda or abstracts. (e) The office of information practices may adopt rules, pursuant to chapter 91, to protect agency records from theft, loss, defacement, alteration, or deterioration and to prevent manifestly excessive interference with the discharge of agencies' other lawful responsibilities and functions. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1; am L 2010, c 100, §§1, 3; am L 2017, c 165, §1]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-03 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Also relied on in: Hawaii Police Bodycam Laws: Public Records & Retention Rules, Are Autopsy Reports Public in Hawaii? (2026 Guide)
§ 92F-15Judicial enforcementIn force
(a) A person aggrieved by a denial of access to a government record may bring an action against the agency at any time within two years after the agency denial to compel disclosure. (b) In an action to compel disclosure, the circuit court shall hear the matter de novo; provided that if the action to compel disclosure is brought because an agency has not made a record available as required by section 92F-15.5(b) after the office of information practices has made a decision to disclose the record and the agency has not appealed that decision within the time period provided by 92F-43, the decision of the office of information practices shall not be subject to challenge by the agency in the action to compel disclosure. Opinions and rulings of the office of information practices shall be admissible and shall be considered as precedent unless found to be palpably erroneous, except that in an action to compel disclosure brought by an aggrieved person after the office of information practices upheld the agency's denial of access to the person as provided in section 92F-15.5(b), the opinion or ruling upholding the agency's denial of access shall be reviewed de novo.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 14 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State of Hawai'i Organization of Police Officers v. Society of Professional Journalists-University of Hawai'i Chapter (Hawaii Supreme Court 1996, 83 Haw. 378)“…ent of access to government records under the UIPA). HRS § 92F-15 (1993) governs judicial enforcement of…”
- Nuuanu Valley Ass'n v. City & County of Honolulu (Hawaii Supreme Court 2008, 119 Haw. 90)“…rt or the state Office of Information Practices pursuant to HRS § 92F-15(a) (1993) [16] and HRS § 92F-15.5 *54…”
- Peer News LLC v. City and County of Honolulu. (Hawaii Supreme Court 2016, 138 Haw. 53)“…REPORTER *** interests at stake. As contemplated by HRS § 92F-15, the court should conduct an in camera…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 92F-15.5Alternative method to appeal a denial of accessIn force
(a) When an agency denies a person access to a government record, the person may appeal the denial to the office of information practices in accordance with rules adopted pursuant to section 92F-42(12). A decision to appeal to the office of information practices for review of the agency denial shall not prejudice the person's right to appeal to the circuit court after a decision is made by the office of information practices. (b) If the decision is to disclose, the office of information practices shall notify the person and the agency, and the agency shall make the record available. If the denial of access is upheld, in whole or in part, the office of information practices shall, in writing, notify the person of the decision, the reasons for the decision, and the right to bring a judicial action under section 92F-15(a). [L 1989, c 192, §1]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at capitol.hawaii.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Nuuanu Valley Ass'n v. City & County of Honolulu (Hawaii Supreme Court 2008, 119 Haw. 90)“…tion Practices pursuant to HRS § 92F-15(a) (1993) [16] and HRS § 92F-15.5 *547 (1993); [17] (4) plans and repo…”
- County of Kauai v. OIP (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals 2009, 200 P.3d 403)“…ject-matter jurisdiction over the case. OIP maintained that HRS § 92F-15.5(b) (1993) did not provide County "the r…”
- State of Hawai'i Organization of Police Officers v. Society of Professional Journalists-University of Hawai'i Chapter (Hawaii Supreme Court 1996, 83 Haw. 378)“…rovides, as an optional alternative, for appeal to the OIP. HRS § 92F-15.5 (Supp.1992). Further, HRS § 92F-…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 45: PUBLIC RECORDS, DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION
§ 45-254Law enforcement recordings using body camera or vehicle camera; criminal investigation records; disclosure.In forcecited in 9 of our articles
(a) Every audio or video recording made and retained by law enforcement using a body camera or a vehicle camera shall be considered a criminal investigation record as defined in K.S.A. 45-217, and amendments thereto. (b) In addition to any disclosure authorized pursuant to the open records act, K.S.A. 45-215 et seq., and amendments thereto, a person described in subsection (c) may make a request in accordance with procedures adopted under K.S.A. 45-220, and amendments thereto, to listen to an audio recording or to view a video recording made by a body camera or a vehicle camera. The law enforcement agency shall allow the person to listen to the requested audio recording or to view the requested video recording within 20 days after making the request, and may charge a reasonable fee for such services provided by the law enforcement agency.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McRoberts v. Overland Park, Kansas, City of (District Court, D. Kansas 2022)“…aintiff he would respond further by March 4, 2022.12 Under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 45-254(b), however, the custodian has twenty d…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Police Body Camera Laws: Access & K.S.A. 45-254, Kansas Public Records Laws: The Kansas Open Records Act (KORA) Explained, Kansas Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules
Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 61: GENERAL PROVISIONS AS TO OFFICES AND OFFICERS -- SOCIAL SECURITY FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES -- EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
§ 61.168Body-worn cameras and video and audio recordings -- Disclosure, retention, and availability for viewing governed by KRS 61.870 to 61.884 and 171.410 to 171.740 -- ExceptionsIn forcecited in 11 of our articles
(1) As used in this section: (a) "Body-worn camera" means a video or audio electronic recording device that is carried by or worn on the body of a public safety officer. This definition does not include a dashboard mounted camera or recording device used in the course of clandestine investigations; (b) "Body-worn camera recording" or "recording" means a video or audio recording, or both, that is made by a body-worn camera during the course of a public safety officer's official duties; (c) "Personal representative" means a court-appointed guardian, attorney, or agent possessing written authorization to act on behalf of a person that is involved in an incident contained in a body-worn camera recording, a person holding a power of attorney for a person that is involved in an incident contained in a body-worn camera recording, or the parent or guardian of a minor child depicted in a body-worn camera recording.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at apps.legislature.ky.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Nathaniel Parish v. Kaitlynn Patrice Petter (2020) addressed whether KRS 61.168 controls how a civil litigant obtains police body-worn camera video, holding that the open records processes in the body camera statutes do not supplant discovery under the Rules of Civil Procedure.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Courier Journal, Inc. v. Shively Police Department (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2022)“…9-month-old infant.” The Courier-Journal notes that while KRS 61.168(4)(g) generally gives an agency discre…”
- Nathaniel Parish v. Kaitlynn Patrice Petter (Court of Appeals of Kentucky 2020)✓A man contesting a protective order subpoenaed police body camera video; the court held KRS 61.168's open records process does not supplant civil discovery, so the family court erred by refusing to apply the civil rules, though it found the error harmless.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Kentucky Police Body Camera Laws: KRS 61.168 & Access, Kentucky Public Records Laws: The Open Records Act (KRS 61.870) Explained
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Haw. Rev. Stat. 92F-15, judicial enforcement and the precedential weight of OIP opinions(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Haw. Rev. Stat. 92F-15.5, administrative appeal to the Office of Information Practices(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Administrative Rules chapter 2-71, agency procedures and fees for processing record requests (sections 2-71-13, 2-71-14, 2-71-31, 2-71-32)(ags.hawaii.gov).gov
- OIP Formal Opinion F22-01, body-worn camera recordings under UIPA(ags.hawaii.gov).gov
- Hawaii Office of Information Practices, UIPA record request resources and forms(ags.hawaii.gov).gov
- Haw. Rev. Stat. chapter 92F, Uniform Information Practices Act (Modified)(capitol.hawaii.gov).gov
- Haw. Rev. Stat. 92F-41, Office of Information Practices established within the Department of Accounting and General Services(capitol.hawaii.gov)