Tennessee
Tennessee Pepper Spray and Stun Gun Laws (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited September 23, 2026). · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Tennessee has no general statute banning, licensing, or capacity-limiting adult civilian purchase, possession, or carry of pepper spray or a stun gun. Title 39, Chapter 17, Part 13 is Tennessee's general weapons law, and its enumerated "Prohibited weapons" list in Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1302 names explosives and explosive weapons, machine guns, hoax devices, and knuckles, plus a catch-all for an implement with "no common lawful purpose." Neither a defense spray nor a stun gun appears anywhere on that list, and the chapter's general definitions section, § 39-17-1301, does not define "defense spray," "chemical dispensing device," "stun gun," or "electronic weapon." But Tennessee does name both devices by name elsewhere in the same chapter: § 39-17-1309(f), added in 2024 by the Laken Riley Act, defines "non-lethal weapon" to include pepper spray and a stun gun and bars a public college or university from prohibiting an adult from carrying one for self-defense on its campus, with exceptions. Two other statutes reach both devices without naming them: the school-weapons statute's general "weapon of like kind" clause is an open, illustrative list rather than a closed one, and any property owner or government entity in Tennessee may post against "the possession of weapons" and make violation a criminal offense. All three are covered below.
Jurisdiction scope: This page covers Tennessee state law only, principally Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-17-1301, 39-17-1302, 39-17-1307, 39-17-1309, 39-17-1310, 39-17-1314, and 39-17-1359, plus the school-discipline statute at § 49-6-3401, the school-restraint definition at § 49-10-1303, and the private-security-licensing statutes at §§ 62-35-118 and 62-35-125. It does not cover Tennessee's handgun-carry permit statutes in detail or every municipal ordinance, which Tennessee's preemption statute may or may not reach for these two devices specifically.
Is pepper spray legal in Tennessee?
Yes, outside the restricted settings covered below. No Tennessee statute imposes a general ban, age floor, capacity limit, or purchase restriction on pepper spray, mace, or any other defense spray for ordinary civilian use. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1302(a) states in full that "a person commits an offense who intentionally or knowingly possesses, manufactures, transports, repairs or sells" only the following: an explosive or explosive weapon, a device principally designed for delivering or shooting an explosive weapon, a machine gun, a hoax device, knuckles, or "any other implement for infliction of serious bodily injury or death that has no common lawful purpose." A canister of pepper spray sold and carried for personal defense does not fit that list, and it is not a plausible fit for the "no common lawful purpose" catch-all given that self-defense is its entire purpose. The chapter's own "explosive weapon" definition at § 39-17-1301(4)(A) includes a bomb, grenade, rocket, mine, shell, missile, or projectile that is explosive, incendiary, or "poisonous gas"; an ordinary hand-held spray canister is not within that definition, though this page has not tested every possible commercial chemical-spray configuration against it.

The chapter's definitions section, § 39-17-1301, confirms there is no separate hook elsewhere in the weapons chapter for ordinary carry: of its 17 defined terms, from "adjudication as a mental defective" through "unloaded," none defines "defense spray," "pepper spray," "chemical dispensing device," or any equivalent term. Tennessee's general unlawful-carry statute, § 39-17-1307(a)(1), which applies to anyone (not only felons or other restricted persons) who "carries, with the intent to go armed, a firearm or a club," is also firearm- and club-specific by its own text and does not reach pepper spray, and the felon- and prohibited-person-specific provisions at subsections (b), (c), and (f) reach only a firearm or handgun. So there is no Tennessee statute disqualifying a felon or any other specific class of person from possessing pepper spray the way federal and state law disqualify felons from possessing firearms. Two other statutes reach pepper spray without naming it, covered below: the school-weapons statute's open "weapon of like kind" definition, and the posted-property statute at § 39-17-1359.
Are stun guns legal in Tennessee?
Yes, for the same reason and with the same qualifications. A stun gun is absent from § 39-17-1302's enumerated prohibited-weapons list on the same terms as pepper spray, and § 39-17-1301's definitions section does not define "stun gun," "electronic weapon," "conducted electrical weapon," or any similar term anywhere in Title 39, Chapter 17. No general civilian permit or license is required to buy or carry a stun gun in Tennessee outside the restricted settings below.

Title 62, Chapter 35, which licenses private security guards and officers, names a stun gun by text. Tenn. Code Ann. § 62-35-118(a)(3) requires an applicant for private security guard/officer registration who will carry "a club, stun gun, chemical spray, night stick or other less than lethal device" to complete training specific to that device, and § 62-35-125 allows an unarmed or armed security guard/officer, with proper certification, to carry "any other type weapon, including, but not be limited to, clubs or batons, stun guns, the chemical spray known as mace or any other tool or weapon that the commissioner may prescribe" as part of that licensed role. Both provisions govern a licensed security officer acting on the job; neither imposes a permit, registration, or training requirement on an ordinary resident who buys a stun gun for personal use.
A stun gun is also named directly in § 39-17-1309(f), added in 2024, which does the opposite of restricting it: for a public college, university, or other public institution of higher education, the institution generally may not prohibit an adult from carrying a stun gun (defined there as part of "non-lethal weapon," along with pepper spray) for self-defense on its campus. That provision is covered fully in the schools section below.
Where you can't carry pepper spray or a stun gun in Tennessee
Schools. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309(b)(1) makes it an offense to possess or carry, openly or concealed, with the intent to go armed, a firearm, explosive, explosive weapon, bowie knife, hawk bill knife, ice pick, dagger, slingshot, leaded cane, switchblade knife, blackjack, knuckles, or "any other weapon of like kind," not used solely for instructional or school-sanctioned ceremonial purposes, in any public or private school building or bus, or on any public or private school campus, grounds, recreation area, or athletic field; a violation is a Class E felony under subsection (b)(3). Subsection (b)(2) is a narrow exception: it is not an offense under subsection (b) for a nonstudent adult to possess a concealed, unhandled pocket knife on school property for the sole purpose of voting in an election. Subsection (a) defines "weapon of like kind" openly rather than exhaustively: it "includes razors and razor blades, except those used solely for personal shaving, and any sharp pointed or edged instrument, except unaltered nail files and clips and tools used solely for preparation of food, instruction and maintenance." Because the statute says "includes," not "means" or "is limited to," nothing in the text forecloses a chemical spray or an electrical weapon from also qualifying as a "weapon of like kind," and neither device is separately named on the section's enumerated list either. For general K-12 school property, this page cannot tell a reader that carrying pepper spray or a stun gun onto a Tennessee school campus, with the intent to go armed, falls outside this felony statute. The next section, Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1310, supplies four affirmative defenses to prosecution under § 39-17-1309(a)-(d). The one most likely to reach an ordinary carrier is the fourth, for a person entering the property for the sole purpose of delivering or picking up passengers who does not remove, utilize, or allow to be removed or utilized any weapon from the vehicle; the other three cover lawful-season hunting on institution land, transiting with unloaded hunting weapons, and approved gun and knife shows.

For a public college, university, or other public institution of higher education, subsection (f) of the same statute answers the question directly and in the carrier's favor. Added in 2024 by the Laken Riley Act (2024 Pub. Ch. 791), it defines "non-lethal weapon" as "pepper spray, a pepper spray gun, pepper gel, mace, a stun gun, an electronic control device, or other conducted energy device," and provides that, "notwithstanding subsection (b) or another law to the contrary," such an institution "shall not prohibit an adult person, including, but not limited to, a staff member, student, employee, and other adult person lawfully present on the property" from carrying a non-lethal weapon for self-defense in a building or bus, or on the campus, grounds, recreation area, or athletic field. Two exceptions qualify that right: the institution may still prohibit non-lethal weapons on the grounds of any pre-kindergarten through grade twelve school located on its campus, and in any building where armed security is provided or where a contract prohibits it.
For a student specifically, the more immediate exposure is the school discipline code rather than the criminal statute. Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(a) lists grounds for suspension or expulsion, including "(7) Possession of a pistol, gun or firearm on school property" and "(8) Possession of a knife and other weapons, as defined in § 39-17-1301 on school property." Zero tolerance under § 49-6-3401(g)(2)(A), which requires at least a one-year expulsion, is limited to "a firearm, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 921," so pepper spray or a stun gun does not trigger mandatory zero-tolerance expulsion. Ground (a)(8) runs through § 39-17-1301, the same general definitions section this page has already established does not define "defense spray," "chemical dispensing device," "stun gun," or "electronic weapon," so that discretionary ground is no broader for either device than the criminal statute is; a locally adopted code of conduct under Title 49 can still reach conduct (a)(8) does not, so a Tennessee parent should not read this page as saying a student faces no school-discipline exposure for either device.
A different, narrower rule sits elsewhere in the education code and governs a different set of people. Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-10-1303(7), part of the K-12 restraint-and-seclusion part of Title 49, defines "noxious substance" as "any defense spray or substance as defined by departmental rule" in the context of restraint and isolation techniques school personnel may use on students. That definition restricts what a school employee may use as a restraint technique; it is not a possession offense and does not by itself restrict a student, parent, or visitor from having pepper spray on their person on school property.
Posted private and government property. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1359(a)(1)(A) authorizes "an individual, corporation, business entity, or local, state, or federal government entity or agent thereof" to "[p]rohibit the possession of weapons by any person who is at a meeting conducted by, or on property owned, operated, or managed or under the control of" that entity, by posting a sign meeting the requirements of subsection (b); subsection (a)(2) applies that prohibition to any person authorized to carry a firearm under § 39-17-1351 or § 39-17-1366. Subsection (c): "It is an offense to possess a weapon in a building or on property that is properly posted in accordance with this section," a Class B misdemeanor "punishable by fine only of five hundred dollars ($500)." "Weapon" is not narrowed anywhere in § 39-17-1359 the way "weapon of like kind" is narrowed in the school statute, so a properly posted courthouse, hospital, stadium, employer, or campus can reach pepper spray or a stun gun as well as a firearm. The sign itself, however, is worded only for firearms: subsection (b)(3) requires a prohibiting sign to read "NO FIREARMS ALLOWED," at least one inch high and eight inches wide, with a circle-and-diagonal-line pictogram of a firearm at least four inches high and wide, plus the phrase "As authorized by T.C.A. § 39-17-1359." A carrier of pepper spray or a stun gun who reads a compliant sign sees a firearm-specific warning, not a general weapons notice. Subsection (f) exempts the grounds of any public park, natural area, historic park, nature trail, campground, forest, greenway, waterway, or other similar public place owned or operated by the state, a county, or a municipality, unless subsection (g) applies. Subsection (g)(1) separately bars a local government entity from prohibiting or restricting an enhanced or concealed handgun carry permit holder's handgun on property it owns or administers unless the entity staffs each public entrance with metal detection devices, a trained law enforcement or security officer, and inspection of each person and bag entering. This is a private or government posting power, not a statewide ban, so whether it applies to a given piece of property depends on whether that property is actually posted.
Three federal layers apply on top of Tennessee law; see the federal section below.
Preemption: does Tennessee bar local pepper spray or stun gun ordinances?
Tennessee's preemption statute, § 39-17-1314, is broad but not unqualified about firearms and ammunition: subsection (a) preempts, "except as otherwise provided by state law or as specifically provided in subsection (b)," the whole field of the regulation of firearms, ammunition, or components of firearms or ammunition "to the exclusion of all county, city, town, municipality, or metropolitan government law, ordinances, resolutions, enactments or regulation." Subsection (b) is the carve-out subsection (a) points to: it expressly authorizes a city, county, town, municipality, or metropolitan government to regulate by ordinance or resolution, among other things, the carrying of firearms by its own employees or independent contractors acting in the course and scope of their employment or contract, and, under (b)(2) as replaced effective July 1, 2025 by 2025 Pub. Ch. 329, SECTION 17, the discharge of firearms within its boundaries to the extent that such regulation is expressly authorized by state law. Subsection (f), amended effective July 1, 2025 by 2025 Pub. Ch. 329, SECTION 22 (which struck "of knives and no city" and substituted "of knives and other weapons and no city," and struck "transportation of knives." and substituted "transportation of knives or other weapons."), now states that "this part is preemptive with respect to the transfer, ownership, possession or transportation of knives and other weapons and no city, county, or metropolitan government shall occupy any part of the field of regulation" of those items. The statute does not define "other weapons" anywhere in the section, so its text does not directly answer whether a local ordinance aimed specifically at pepper spray or a stun gun would be preempted the same way a local knife ordinance now is. This page does not identify or examine any specific Tennessee municipal or county ordinance addressing either device, so whether a particular city or county currently regulates them is not established here.
Federal law: what it does and does not reach
No federal statute regulates a civilian's purchase or possession of pepper spray or a stun gun. Federal law matters in three places.
Federal buildings. Under 18 U.S.C. § 930(a), whoever knowingly possesses or causes to be present "a firearm or other dangerous weapon in a Federal facility (other than a Federal court facility)" faces a fine, imprisonment of up to 1 year, or both. Subsection (e) sets up to 2 years for a federal court facility, and subsection (b) up to 5 years where the weapon is intended to be used in a crime. Section 930(g)(2) defines the term:
The term "dangerous weapon" means a weapon, device, instrument, material, or substance, animate or inanimate, that is used for, or is readily capable of, causing death or serious bodily injury, except that such term does not include a pocket knife with a blade of less than 2½ inches in length.
The definition names neither device. Whether a particular spray or stun gun is "readily capable of" causing serious bodily injury is a question of fact the statute does not answer. Subsection (d)(3) exempts "the lawful carrying of firearms or other dangerous weapons in a Federal facility incident to hunting or other lawful purposes," and subsection (h) requires notice of the ban to be posted at each public entrance. A "Federal facility" is "a building or part thereof owned or leased by the Federal Government, where Federal employees are regularly present for the purpose of performing their official duties."
Air travel. The Transportation Security Administration's screening rules, which are agency policy rather than statute, bar both devices from carry-on bags. One 4 fl. oz. (118 ml) container of mace or pepper spray is permitted in checked baggage if it has a safety mechanism to prevent accidental discharge, and sprays containing more than 2 percent by mass of tear gas (CS or CN) are prohibited in checked baggage. Tasers, stun guns and other electro-shock weapons may travel in checked baggage only if transported so the device cannot discharge accidentally. Airlines may set stricter rules.
National parks. National Park Service regulations prohibit possessing, carrying or using a "weapon" in a park area except as the regulations provide (36 CFR 2.4(b)(1)). 36 CFR 1.4 defines "weapon" to include an "irritant gas device" and any "weapon the possession of which is prohibited under the laws of the State in which the park area or portion thereof is located."
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information about Tennessee's pepper spray and stun gun laws as of September 2026. It is not legal advice. Consult a lawyer licensed in Tennessee for advice about a specific situation.
For a state-by-state comparison, see pepper spray and stun gun laws by state. Tennessee's self-defense statutes are covered separately on the Tennessee self-defense laws page.
Statutes cited reflect their in-force version as of 2026-09-18. Last updated: 2026-09-18.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is pepper spray legal to carry in Tennessee?
Yes, outside restricted settings. No Tennessee statute bans, licenses, or age-restricts pepper spray for adult civilian use, and Tenn. Code Ann. 39-17-1302's enumerated list of prohibited weapons does not include it. Tennessee lets any property owner or government entity post against 'the possession of weapons' under 39-17-1359 (a $500 Class B misdemeanor to violate, with the required sign worded 'NO FIREARMS ALLOWED'), and the school-weapons statute's open 'weapon of like kind' definition does not clearly exclude a chemical spray from general K-12 school property. For a public college or university, 39-17-1309(f) affirmatively protects carrying pepper spray for self-defense on campus, with narrow exceptions.
Is it legal to own a stun gun in Tennessee?
Yes, outside restricted settings. A stun gun is absent from the enumerated prohibited-weapons list in Tenn. Code Ann. 39-17-1302, and no general civilian permit or license is required to buy or carry one. Tennessee separately regulates stun guns for licensed private security guards and officers, who must complete device-specific training under Title 62, Chapter 35 before carrying one on duty, and names a stun gun directly in 39-17-1309(f) (added in 2024), which bars a public college or university from prohibiting an adult from carrying one for self-defense on its campus, with exceptions.
Can you carry pepper spray or a stun gun on a Tennessee school campus?
It depends on the campus. For a public college, university, or other public institution of higher education, 39-17-1309(f), added in 2024, bars the institution from prohibiting an adult, including a student, staff member, or employee, from carrying pepper spray or a stun gun for self-defense, except on the grounds of a pre-K-12 school located on that campus or in a building with armed security or a contract prohibition. For general K-12 school property, the criminal school-weapons statute, 39-17-1309(a)-(b), defines 'weapon of like kind' with the word 'includes,' not as a closed list, so this page cannot say pepper spray or a stun gun falls outside the Class E felony that statute creates (at subsection (b)(3)) for carrying a listed weapon with the intent to go armed. For a student, 49-6-3401(a)(8) is also a discretionary suspension or expulsion ground, running through the same 39-17-1301 definitions that do not name either device, so it is no broader than the criminal statute, though a locally adopted code of conduct can still reach conduct it does not; it is not a mandatory zero-tolerance offense. A separate provision, 49-10-1303(7), restricts what school staff may use as a restraint technique on students; it does not by itself restrict what a student, parent, or visitor may carry.
Can a Tennessee business or property owner ban pepper spray or stun guns?
Yes. Tenn. Code Ann. 39-17-1359 lets any individual, business, or government entity prohibit 'the possession of weapons' on property it controls by posting a sign meeting the statute's requirements. 'Weapon' is not narrowed to firearms in the prohibition itself, so a properly posted location can reach pepper spray or a stun gun; violating a valid posting is a Class B misdemeanor punishable by a $500 fine only. The required sign is nonetheless worded for firearms ('NO FIREARMS ALLOWED' with a firearm pictogram), and the statute exempts state- and locally-owned parks, trails, and similar public places, and limits a local government's power to exclude a handgun-carry permit holder's handgun unless it staffs each entrance with metal detection and inspection.
Does Tennessee law preempt city or county ordinances on pepper spray or stun guns?
Tennessee's preemption statute, 39-17-1314, clearly preempts local regulation of firearms, ammunition, knives, and, as of a July 1, 2025 amendment, 'other weapons,' but it does not define 'other weapons,' so the text does not directly resolve whether a local ordinance aimed at pepper spray or a stun gun specifically would be preempted. This page does not examine any particular city's or county's ordinance.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Tennessee Code Annotated
§ 39-17-1301Part definitions.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) “Adjudication as a mental defective or adjudicated as a mental defective” means: (A) A determination by a court in this state that a person, as a result of marked subnormal intelligence, mental illness, incompetency, condition or…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-05-21 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 22 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State of Tennessee v. Christopher Oberton Curry, Jr. (Tennessee Supreme Court 2025)“…(g); R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-47-2(5); S.C. Code Ann. § 16-1-60; Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1301(3); Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-203.5(1)(c);…”
- State v. Morgan (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee 2008, 271 S.W.3d 217)“…A. §§ 39-14-301-307), and explosive offensives and weapons (T.C.A. §§ 39-17-1301-1361), as the statutes replacing T.C.A.…”
- State of Tennessee v. Keion Lamonte Jemison (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee 2026)“…ve provided a definition under the appropriate title. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1301(3). Aggravated assault of any deg…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Tennessee Knife Laws (2026): Carry, School Property, Preemption
§ 39-17-1302Prohibited weapons.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) A person commits an offense who intentionally or knowingly possesses, manufactures, transports, repairs or sells: (1) An explosive or an explosive weapon; (2) A device principally designed, made or adapted for delivering or shooting an explosive weapon; (3) A machine gun; (4) A short-barrel…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-05-21 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 10 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Loden (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee 1995, 920 S.W.2d 261)“…f carrying a prohibited weapon, a class A misdemeanor under Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-1302 (1991). 6 Under the Sentencing Act, th…”
- State of Tennessee v. Willie Locust (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee 2023)“…nowingly possess certain weapons, including brass knuckles. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1302(a)(6). It is also unlawful to possess a…”
- State of Tennessee v. Robbie Gibson (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee 2022)“…y possesses . . . : an explosive or an explosive weapon[.]” T.C.A. § 39-17-1302(a)(1). An explosive or explosive weapon…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Pepper Spray and Stun Gun Laws by State (2026)
§ 39-17-1307Unlawful carrying or possession of a weapon.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a)(1) A person commits an offense who carries, with the intent to go armed, a firearm or a club. (2)(A) The first violation of subdivision (a)(1) is a Class C misdemeanor, and, in addition to possible imprisonment as provided by law, may be punished by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-05-21 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 169 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State v. Black (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee 1995, 924 S.W.2d 912)“…se or attempted use of force, violence, or a deadly weapon. T.C.A. § 39-17-1307(b)(l)(A) (1991). The appellant was prev…”
- State v. Johnson (Tennessee Supreme Court 2002, 79 S.W.3d 522)“…guilty plea to unlawful possession of a weapon pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-1307(b)(1)(A): “After an individual has had…”
- State v. Ferguson (Court of Appeals of Tennessee 2003, 106 S.W.3d 665)“…State’s motion. District Attorney Mike Bottoms argued that Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-1307(b)(1)(B) precluded individuals who *66…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 39-17-1309Carrying weapons on school property.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) As used in this section, “weapon of like kind” includes razors and razor blades, except those used solely for personal shaving, and any sharp pointed or edged instrument, except unaltered nail files and clips and tools used solely for preparation of food, instruction and maintenance. (b)(1) It…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-24 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at publications.tnsosfiles.com
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2016
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State of Tennessee v. Cephus D. Spicer (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee 2016)“…stration of any public or private educational institution.” T.C.A. § 39-17-1309(b)(1).…”
- State of Tennessee v. Micah England (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee 2016)“…ce of the sentence to be determined by the trial court. See T.C.A. § 39-17-1309 (2014) (amended 2015). The court senten…”
- State of Tennessee v. Tracey C. Clark (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee 2008)“…ode Annotated section 39-17-1309(b)(1) is a Class E felony. T.C.A. § 39-17-1309(b)(2). Tennessee Code Annotated section…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 39-17-1310Affirmative defense to carrying weapons on school property.In force
It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under § 39-17-1309(a) -(d) that the person's behavior was in strict compliance with the requirements of one (1) of the following classifications: (1) A person hunting during the lawful hunting season on lands owned by any public or private educational…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-05-21 · Read the full text in our law library
§ 39-17-1314Preemption of local regulation of firearms, ammunition, and knives — Actions against firearms or ammunition manufacturer, trade association, or dealer — Party adversely affected by local regulation.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) Except as otherwise provided by state law or as specifically provided in subsection (b), the general assembly preempts the whole field of the regulation of firearms, ammunition, or components of firearms or ammunition, or combinations thereof including, but not limited to, the use, purchase,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-05-21 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2017
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Tennessee Firearms Association v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee (Court of Appeals of Tennessee 2017)“…onents of firearms or ammunition, or combinations thereof. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1314(a) (emphasis added). Goodman argued tha…”
- City of Philadelphia v. Beretta U.S.A., Corp. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2000, 126 F. Supp. 2d 882)“…1289.24a (1999); S.D.Codified Laws § 21-58-2 (Michie 2000); Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-1314 (1999); Tex.Civ.Prac. &…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Knife Laws by State (2026): Carry Rules, Blade Limits, Penalties
§ 39-17-1359Prohibition at certain meetings — Posted notice — Handgun carry permit holder.In force
(a)(1) Except as provided in § 39-17-1313, an individual, corporation, business entity, or local, state, or federal government entity or agent thereof is authorized to: (A) Prohibit the possession of weapons by any person who is at a meeting conducted by, or on property owned, operated, or managed…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-05-21 · Read the full text in our law library
§ 49-10-1303Part definitions.In force
For the purposes of this part, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) “Behavior intervention training program” means a training program in positive behavioral supports, crisis intervention and the safe use of restraint and isolation; (2) “Chemical restraint” means a medication that is…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-05-21 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- I.L. ex rel. Taylor v. Knox County Board of Education (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 2017, 257 F. Supp. 3d 946)“…edom of movement or normal access to the student’s body. Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-10-1303 (2), (6), (8). These definitions have t…”
- O.B. v. Rutherford County, Tennessee (District Court, M.D. Tennessee 2023)“…at to the physical safety of the student or others nearby.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-10-1303(3). At the time of the incident, the T…”
- E.S. v. Clarksville Montgomery County School System (District Court, M.D. Tennessee 2023)“…hysically placing themselves in front of the student; Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-10-1303.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 49-6-3401Suspension of students — Expulsion of students — Exception for self-defense.In force
(a) Any principal, principal-teacher or assistant principal of any public school in this state is authorized to suspend a pupil from attendance at the school, including its sponsored activities, or from riding a school bus, for good and sufficient reasons.…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-05-21 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 17 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Christian Heyne v. Metropolitan Nashville Board of Public Education (Tennessee Supreme Court 2012, 380 S.W.3d 715)“…authority to impose discipline up to a ten-day suspension. Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(c)(2) (Supp. 2011). However, if the pri…”
- Quentin Link, a Minor, by Next Friend & Legal Guardian v. Metropolitan Nashville Board of Public Education (Court of Appeals of Tennessee 2013)“…e Level Two decision to the Metro school board. Pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(b)(6), the board is authorized to “gran…”
- Christine Heyne v. Metropolitan Nashville Board of Public Education (Court of Appeals of Tennessee 2011)“…ng to suspension of public school students, as set forth in Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401, et seq., followed by an analysis of th…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 62-35-118Registration cards — Training and examination of applicants.In force
(a)(1) Within fifteen (15) days of employment, an unarmed security guard/officer applicant must complete general training and pass an examination and an armed security guard/officer applicant must complete general training, pass an examination and complete the training in subsection (b) within…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-05-21 · Read the full text in our law library
§ 62-35-125Carrying of weapons by security guards/officers.In force
An armed security guard/officer may carry only the types of firearms that the commissioner prescribes, by rules and regulations, in the performance of the person's duties. A security guard/officer may carry a firearm only if certified to carry the firearm.…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-05-21 · Read the full text in our law library
Code of Federal Regulations Title 36
§ 1.4What terms do I need to know?In forcecited in 53 of our articles
(a) The following definitions shall apply to this chapter, unless modified by the definitions for a specific part or regulation: Abandonment means the voluntary relinquishment of property with no intent to retain possession. Administrative activities means those activities conducted under the authority of the National Park Service for the purpose of safeguarding persons or property, implementing management plans and policies developed in accordance and consistent with the regulations in this chapter, or repairing or maintaining government facilities. Airboat means a vessel that is supported by the buoyancy of its hull and powered by a propeller or fan above the waterline. This definition should not be construed to mean a “hovercraft,” that is supported by a fan-generated air cushion. Aircraft means a device that is used or intended to be used for human flight in the air, including powerless flight. Archeological resource means material remains of past human life or activities that are of archeological interest and are at least 50 years of age.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 34 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- WildEarth Guardians v. National Park Service (Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 2013, 703 F.3d 1178)“…collect, kill, wound, or attempt to do any of the above.” 36 C.F.R. § 1.4(a). WildEarth argues that because NPS…”
- Nature v. United States (District Court, E.D. California 2017, 250 F. Supp. 3d 634)“…ent, historic, parkway, recreational, or other purposes. 36 C.F.R. § 1.4 . Nature argues that the El Portal Admi…”
- United States v. Knauer (District Court, E.D. New York 2010, 707 F. Supp. 2d 379)“…ng or attempting to take wildlife, except trapping. 36 C.F.R. § 1.4 (a) (in relevant part, reordered for cl…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama Pepper Spray and Stun Gun Laws (2026), Alaska Pepper Spray and Stun Gun Laws (2026), Arizona Pepper Spray and Stun Gun Laws (2026)
§ 2.4Weapons, traps and nets.In forcecited in 53 of our articles
(a) None of the provisions in this section or any regulation in this chapter may be enforced to prohibit an individual from possessing a firearm, including an assembled or functional firearm, in any National Park System unit if: (1) The individual is not otherwise prohibited by law from possessing the firearm; and (2) The possession of the firearm is in compliance with the law of the State in which the National Park System unit is located. (b)(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section and parts 7 (special regulations) and 13 (Alaska regulations), the following are prohibited: (i) Possessing a weapon, trap or net (ii) Carrying a weapon, trap or net (iii) Using a weapon, trap or net (2) Weapons, traps or nets may be carried, possessed or used: (i) At designated times and locations in park areas where: (A) The taking of wildlife is authorized by law in accordance with § 2.2 of this chapter; (B) The taking of fish is authorized by law in accordance with § 2.3 of this part. (ii) When used for target practice at designated times and at facilities or locations designed and constructed specifically for this purpose and designated pursuant to special regulations.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 26 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Masciandaro (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2011, 638 F.3d 458)“…motor vehicle within a national park area, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 2.4(b). He challenges his con- viction on t…”
- Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence v. Salazar (District Court, District of Columbia 2009, 612 F. Supp. 2d 1)“…eady use.” 48 Fed.Reg. 30,252 (June 30, 1983), codified at 36 C.F.R. § 2.4 (a)(2). A similar regulation applied to…”
- United States v. Otis Lofton, United States of America v. Otis Lofton (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2000, 233 F.3d 313)“…l Park Service. See 36 C.F.R. § 1.2 (2000); 36 C.F.R. § 2.4 (2000). Lofton’s conviction was affirm…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Pennsylvania Pepper Spray and Stun Gun Laws (2026), Arkansas Pepper Spray and Stun Gun Laws (2026), California Pepper Spray and Stun Gun Laws (2026)
United States Code Title 18
§ 921DefinitionsIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
As used in this chapter— The term “person” and the term “whoever” include any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, or joint stock company. The term “interstate or foreign commerce” includes commerce between any place in a State and any place outside of that State, or within any possession of the United States (not including the Canal Zone) or the District of Columbia, but such term does not include commerce between places within the same State but through any place outside of that State. The term “State” includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the possessions of the United States (not including the Canal Zone). The term “firearm” means (A) any weapon (including a starter gun) which will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive; (B) the frame or receiver of any such weapon; (C) any firearm muffler or firearm silencer; or (D) any destructive device. Such term does not include an antique firearm.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 3,010 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Rehaif v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 2019, 588 U.S. 225)“…arms Owners’ Protection Act, 100 Stat. 449, note following 18 U. S. C. §921, which reorganized the prohibition on f…”
- United States v. Biswell (Supreme Court of the United States 1972, 406 U.S. 311)“…the Court. The Gun Control Act of 1968, 82 Stat. 1213 , 18 U. S. C. § 921 et seq., authorizes official entry d…”
- Muscarello v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1998, 524 U.S. 125)“…e is “explosive,” “incendiary,” or delivers ‘‘poison gas.” 18 U. S. C. § 921 (a)(4)(A). On petitioners’ reading, the…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Can You Become an ICE Agent with a Criminal Record? (2026 Guide), How Long Does a Felony Stay on Your Record? (2026), ATF "Engaged in the Business" Rule Vacated Nationwide in Texas v. ATF
§ 930Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facilitiesIn forcecited in 55 of our articles
Except as provided in subsection (d), whoever knowingly possesses or causes to be present a firearm or other dangerous weapon in a Federal facility (other than a Federal court facility), or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both. Whoever, with intent that a firearm or other dangerous weapon be used in the commission of a crime, knowingly possesses or causes to be present such firearm or dangerous weapon in a Federal facility, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. A person who kills any person in the course of a violation of subsection (a) or (b), or in the course of an attack on a Federal facility involving the use of a firearm or other dangerous weapon, or attempts or conspires to do such an act, shall be punished as provided in sections 1111, 1112, 1113, and 1117.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 90 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Odeh (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2008, 552 F.3d 93)“…f an attack on a U.S. facility in Nairobi, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 930 (c) (Counts 9-221); murder of U.S. offi…”
- Kawaljeet Tagore v. USA (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 2013, 735 F.3d 324)“…statutory ban on weapons with blades exceeding 2.5 inches. 18 U.S.C. § 930(a), (g)(2).…”
- Heller v. District of Columbia (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 2015, 801 F.3d 264)“…universally prohibited from possessing firearms. See, e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 930(a), (g)(1) (unlawful to “knowingly poss…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Knife Laws (2026): Carry, Blade Length, Preemption, North Dakota Knife Laws (2026): The 6-Inch Rule and Licensing, Colorado Pepper Spray and Stun Gun Laws (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Tenn. Code Ann. 39-17-1302 - Prohibited weapons (enumerated list; excludes pepper spray and stun guns)(law.justia.com)
- Tenn. Code Ann. 39-17-1301 - Part definitions (no definition of defense spray, chemical dispensing device, or stun gun)(law.justia.com)
- Tenn. Code Ann. 39-17-1307 - Unlawful carrying or possession of a weapon (firearms, clubs, and ammunition only)(law.justia.com)
- Tenn. Code Ann. 39-17-1309 - Carrying weapons on school property (enumerated list, 'weapon of like kind' definition, and (f) non-lethal-weapon campus carve-out)(law.justia.com)
- 2024 Tenn. Pub. Ch. 791, SECTION 2 (Laken Riley Act of 2024) - adds 39-17-1309(f), defining 'non-lethal weapon' to include pepper spray and stun guns and barring public colleges/universities from prohibiting campus self-defense carry(publications.tnsosfiles.com).gov
- Tenn. Code Ann. 39-17-1310 - Affirmative defense to carrying weapons on school property(law.justia.com)
- Tenn. Code Ann. 39-17-1314 - Preemption of local regulation of firearms, ammunition, knives, and other weapons (as amended eff. 7/1/2025)(law.justia.com)
- Tenn. Code Ann. 39-17-1359 - Posting of property to prohibit or restrict weapons; offense; penalty(law.justia.com)
- Tenn. Code Ann. 49-6-3401 - Suspension and expulsion of pupils (weapons-related grounds; zero-tolerance firearm offense)(law.justia.com)
- Tenn. Code Ann. 49-10-1303(7) - Part definitions, K-12 restraint and isolation ('noxious substance' means any defense spray)(law.justia.com)
- 2025 Tenn. Pub. Ch. 329, SECTION 22 - amends 39-17-1314(f) to add 'other weapons' to the local-preemption clause, effective July 1, 2025(publications.tnsosfiles.com).gov
- Tenn. Code Ann. 62-35-118, 62-35-125 - Private security guard/officer registration, training, and carrying of stun guns and chemical spray(law.justia.com)
- 18 U.S.C. 930 - Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facilities(law.cornell.edu)
- Transportation Security Administration - What Can I Bring? Pepper Spray(tsa.gov).gov
- Transportation Security Administration - What Can I Bring? Stun Guns/Shocking Devices(tsa.gov).gov
- 36 CFR 1.4 - National Park Service definitions (weapon)(ecfr.gov).gov
- 36 CFR 2.4 - Weapons, traps and nets(ecfr.gov).gov