Mississippi
Mississippi Nursing Home Camera Laws: SB 2713 and What Applies Today
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 14, 2026). · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Mississippi has no statute or regulation authorizing or governing cameras in nursing home resident rooms. A 2022 bill, SB 2713, would have created a detailed framework, but it died in committee and has never been reintroduced. This page covers what Mississippi law says today, what SB 2713 would have done, and practical guidance for Mississippi families.
This page is part of our Nursing Home Camera Laws hub, which compares all 50 states, and our national Nursing Home Camera Laws guide covering the states that do have an enacted statute.
Mississippi Has No Nursing Home Camera Statute Today
No Mississippi statute grants a resident or their legal representative a right to install a camera or audio device in a nursing home room. Mississippi's nursing facility licensing rules, found in the Mississippi Administrative Code, Title 15, Part 16, Subpart 1, Chapter 45 (the State Department of Health's "Minimum Standards of Operation for Institutions for the Aged or Infirm"), include a Resident Rights subchapter among 58 total subchapters, but none of them address electronic monitoring, cameras, or recording equipment. Industry roundups tracking which states have enacted a nursing-home electronic-monitoring statute, including Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Utah, do not list Mississippi among them. Whether a resident can have a camera in a Mississippi nursing home today depends entirely on the individual facility's own admission agreement and policy, not on any statewide legal right.
Senate Bill 2713: A Detailed Framework That Died in Committee
Senate Bill 2713, sponsored by Senator Hill, was introduced in the Mississippi Senate on January 17, 2022, and referred to the Senate Public Health and Welfare Committee. It died in committee on February 1, 2022, without a floor vote, and no newer bill addressing the same subject has been found in any Mississippi legislative session since, through 2026.

As introduced, SB 2713 would have amended Miss. Code Ann. § 43-11-13, the state's general nursing facility licensing statute, to let a resident with capacity to consent, or their legal representative, authorize installation of a "monitoring device" in the resident's room, so long as several conditions were met. The bill's definition of a monitoring device specifically excluded a camera that records still images exclusively. The resident would have paid for the device and all installation, operation, maintenance, and removal costs. In a shared room, the bill would have required written consent from each resident occupying the room, or that resident's legal representative; if a roommate did not consent, the facility would have been required to offer to move either resident to another available shared room, with the requesting resident able to instead take a private room at their own expense. The bill also would have required two separate signs: one at the facility's main entrance, disclosing that some residents' rooms may be electronically monitored, paid for and maintained by the facility, and one on the resident's own door stating the room is electronically monitored, paid for and maintained by the resident or their representative. It would have barred a nursing home from denying admission to, discharging, or otherwise retaliating against a resident for choosing to authorize a device.
Watch out: SB 2713 is not law. It describes what was proposed in 2022 and never reintroduced since, not what Mississippi actually permits or requires today. A facility is under no legal obligation to follow any of the procedures the bill would have created.
Audio vs. Video: Mississippi's General Recording Law Still Applies
Even without a nursing-home-specific statute, Mississippi's general wiretap law governs any camera or audio device placed in a resident's room. Mississippi is a one-party consent state under Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-531(e): interception of a wire or oral communication is lawful where the person recording is a party to it, or where at least one party has given consent.
That exception carries a limit worth knowing before installing anything. Section 41-29-531(e) itself withdraws the protection where the communication is intercepted "for the purpose of committing any criminal or tortious act in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States or of this state, or for the purpose of committing any other injurious act." That last clause is broader than the federal Wiretap Act's analogue, which reaches only criminal and tortious purposes, so a Mississippi recording made for a purpose a court viewed as injurious could sit outside the safe harbor even if no crime or tort was intended.
That framework covers a resident, or someone recording with the resident's consent, capturing their own conversations. It is less clear where a camera with audio also picks up conversations the resident is not part of, such as staff talking among themselves or a roommate speaking with a visitor. Neither of those parties has consented, which can raise separate exposure under Mississippi's wiretap law. A video-only device avoids this issue, since the statute, like the federal Wiretap Act, reaches communications, not silent video. For the general mechanics of Mississippi's one-party consent rule, see our Mississippi recording law guide and its security camera page.
What This Means in Practice
Because Mississippi has no statute either granting or barring a resident's right to a camera, the facility's admission agreement controls. Before installing any device:

- Ask the administrator directly and get any permission in writing. Some Mississippi facilities allow family-installed cameras under their own policy; others prohibit them.
- Address a shared room separately. Mississippi has no statutory roommate-consent requirement outside the unenacted SB 2713; a facility that permits cameras will typically set its own rule, which may mean seeking the roommate's agreement or requesting a private room.
- Consider a video-only device if consent from everyone who might be recorded, including staff and a roommate's visitors, cannot realistically be obtained.
- An undisclosed camera carries real practical risk. It is not itself a crime under Mississippi's video-recording law, but a facility that discovers it may treat it as a violation of the admission agreement, and audio the device captures from a conversation that falls outside the one-party exception in § 41-29-531(e) can expose the person who installed it both to a civil suit under § 41-29-529, which allows actual damages of at least $100 per day of violation or $1,000, whichever is higher, plus punitive damages and attorney's fees, and to a misdemeanor charge under § 41-29-533, punishable by up to one year in county jail, a fine of up to $10,000, or both.
If You Suspect Abuse or Neglect
Camera footage, whether from a facility system or a family device installed with permission, is sometimes the evidence that first reveals abuse or neglect. If footage or another source raises a genuine concern about how a resident is being treated, that concern may support a legal claim separate from whether the camera itself was properly authorized.
Harmed by a product or exposure? Speak with an attorney about your options
If you or a loved one may have been harmed, you can speak with an attorney about your legal options at no cost. Whether you have a claim depends on the specific facts. This is attorney advertising, not a guarantee that you qualify or of any particular outcome.
Reporting a Concern: The Mississippi Long-Term Care Ombudsman
Mississippi residents, families, and staff can raise complaints about facility policy, retaliation, or suspected abuse or neglect with the Mississippi Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, run through the Department of Human Services' Division of Aging and Adult Services, reachable at its statewide hotline. Under the federal Older Americans Act, the program covers assisted living residents as well as nursing home residents, regardless of whether Mississippi has a camera statute.

Information last verified on 2026-08-31, drawn from Mississippi Legislature SB 2713 (2022) bill records, Miss. Code Ann. §§ 41-29-529, 41-29-531 and 41-29-533, and the Mississippi Administrative Code Title 15, Part 16, Chapter 45. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer and is not legal advice.
Related Resources
- Nursing Home Camera Laws by State
- Nursing Home Camera Laws: 50-State Comparison
- Mississippi Recording Laws
- Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect Claims
- Mississippi Power of Attorney Laws
Last updated: 2026-08-31.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it legal to put a camera in a nursing home room in Mississippi?
Mississippi has no statute either granting or barring this right. Whether a camera is allowed depends on the individual facility's admission agreement. A 2022 bill, SB 2713, would have created a statutory right but died in committee and has not been reintroduced.
What happened to Mississippi's nursing home camera bill?
Senate Bill 2713 died in the Senate Public Health and Welfare Committee on February 1, 2022. No newer version has been introduced in any Mississippi legislative session since, through 2026.
Would Mississippi's proposed bill have required signs disclosing a camera?
Yes. As drafted, SB 2713 would have required a sign at the facility's main entrance disclosing that some residents' rooms may be monitored, and a separate sign on the monitored resident's own door.
Can a nursing home refuse to allow a camera in Mississippi?
Yes. Because no Mississippi statute grants residents a right to install a camera, a facility can lawfully permit, condition, or prohibit cameras as a matter of its own admission agreement and policy.
Is Mississippi a one-party or two-party consent state for recording?
Mississippi is a one-party consent state under Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-531(e). A person who is a party to a conversation, or has the consent of at least one party, may lawfully record it. That exception does not apply where the communication is intercepted for the purpose of committing a criminal or tortious act, or any other injurious act.
Who do I contact if I suspect abuse at a Mississippi nursing home?
The Mississippi Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, run through the Department of Human Services, investigates complaints about nursing home and assisted living residents' care and rights at no cost. Suspected abuse can also be reported to Mississippi Adult Protective Services or local law enforcement.
Updates
Corrected the statutory citation for recording liability (Miss. Code Ann. §§ 41-29-529 and 41-29-533, not § 41-29-531, which is the exceptions section) and added the limitation in § 41-29-531(e) that withdraws Mississippi's one-party consent exception where a recording is made for a criminal, tortious, or other injurious purpose.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Mississippi Code of 1972 Annotated
§ 41-29-531Exceptions to civil liability for violation of this article.In forcecited in 18 of our articles
This article shall not apply to: An operator of a switchboard, or an officer, employee or agent of a communication common carrier whose facilities are used in the transmission of a wire communication, intercepts a communication, or who discloses or uses an intercepted communication in the normal…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at billstatus.ls.state.ms.us
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Campbell v. MESC (Court of Appeals of Mississippi 2000, 782 So. 2d 751)“…le involved in the conversation are aware of the recording. Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-531(e) (the statute does not apply to a con…”
- Brian S. Pope v. Deborah Baird Martin a/k/a Deborah L. Martin a/k/a Deborah Martin Pope a/k/a Deborah L. Pope (Court of Appeals of Mississippi 2023)“…vides a list of those who are immune from civil liability. Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-531 (Rev. 2018). Relevant to the present ca…”
- Rosenberg (District Court, S.D. Mississippi 2026)“…olation of the Mississippi Security of Communications Act, Miss. Code Ann. §§ 41-29-531 to -537 (Count IX). See id. at 40-47.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Mississippi Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent Rules, Mississippi AI Meeting Recording Laws (2026), Mississippi Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026
Code of Federal Regulations Title 42
§ 483.10Resident rights.In forcecited in 19 of our articles
(a) Residents rights. The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility, including those specified in this section. (1) A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident. (2) The facility must provide equal access to quality care regardless of diagnosis, severity of condition, or payment source. A facility must establish and maintain identical policies and practices regarding transfer, discharge, and the provision of services under the State plan for all residents regardless of payment source. (b) Exercise of rights. The resident has the right to exercise his or her rights as a resident of the facility and as a citizen or resident of the United States.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 85 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts reviewing CMS penalties have applied the notice duty then codified at section 483.10(b)(11). Claiborne-Hughes Health Center v. Sebelius (2010) upheld noncompliance where a facility did not promptly consult the physician or notify family after a resident's decline; Senior Rehabilitation (2010) sustained a similar finding.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Roudachevski v. All-American Care Centers, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 2011, 648 F.3d 701)✓A doctor cut off from his nursing home patients sought an injunction, arguing residents' right under Section 483.10(d)(1) to choose a physician made the public interest favor him; the Eighth Circuit affirmed the denial, finding that interest not presently ascertainable.
- CLAIBORNE-HUGHES HEALTH CENTER v. Sebelius (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 2010, 609 F.3d 839)✓A resident's food intake fell sharply for three weeks and he lost 18.5 pounds before the nursing home called his doctor or family; the Sixth Circuit upheld findings that it violated Section 483.10(b)(11)'s immediate-notification duty and that the lapse was immediate jeopardy.
- Gray Panthers Advocacy Committee v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1991, 936 F.2d 1284)“…how to apply for and use Medicare and Medicaid benefits.” 42 C.F.R. § 483.10 (b)(9) (1990). On the topic of property…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama Nursing Home Camera Laws: No Statute, What Applies, Colorado Nursing Home Camera Laws: No Statute, What Applies, Massachusetts Nursing Home Camera Laws: All-Party Consent Risks
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Mississippi Legislature, SB 2713 (2022 Regular Session) bill text(billstatus.ls.state.ms.us).gov
- Mississippi Legislature, SB 2713 (2022) action and status history(billstatus.ls.state.ms.us).gov
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Mississippi recording law guide (Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-531)(rcfp.org)
- Mississippi Department of Human Services, State Long-Term Care Ombudsman(mdhs.ms.gov).gov
- 42 CFR § 483.10, Nursing home resident rights (federal)(law.cornell.edu)
- Mississippi Legislature, HB 593 (2024) bill text reproducing Miss. Code Ann. §§ 41-29-529 (civil action), 41-29-531 (exceptions) and 41-29-533 (penalties)(billstatus.ls.state.ms.us)