Georgia
Georgia GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited June 17, 2026). · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. How we verify our legal content
If you are wondering whether you can put a GPS tracker on someone's car in Georgia, the honest answer is that Georgia never wrote a general law about GPS devices. That does not mean tracking is legal. Prosecutors reach for the stalking statute instead, and it fits GPS tracking surprisingly well. And planting a tracker on the car of someone who holds a protective order against you is its own felony.
This guide explains how Georgia law actually treats vehicle trackers, who can legally use one, what the penalties look like, and what to do if you find a tracker on your own car.
Is It Legal to Put a GPS Tracker on a Car in Georgia?
It depends on whose car it is and why you are tracking it. Georgia never passed a general electronic tracking device law. The one code section that names GPS devices, O.C.G.A. 16-11-62(8), is narrow: it applies only when the vehicle's owner or lessee already holds a protective order against the person planting the device.
That gap does not create a free pass. Putting a tracker on a vehicle you do not own, without the owner's consent, exposes you to Georgia's stalking statute. The law specifically criminalizes "placing under surveillance," and Georgia courts treat electronic monitoring as exactly that.
Putting a tracker on your own vehicle is legal. Tracking a car titled solely to someone else, like an ex, a dating partner, or a neighbor, is where criminal liability starts.
There is also a constitutional layer. In United States v. Jones (2012), the U.S. Supreme Court held that when the government attaches a GPS device to a car, that is a Fourth Amendment search, which generally requires a warrant. Jones limits police, not private citizens, but it shows how seriously courts treat covert vehicle tracking.
Georgia's Stalking Law and "Placing Under Surveillance" (O.C.G.A. 16-5-90)
Georgia's stalking statute is the workhorse for GPS tracking cases. Under O.C.G.A. 16-5-90, a person commits stalking when they follow, place under surveillance, or contact another person without consent "for the purpose of harassing and intimidating" them.
Each piece of that matters for trackers:
- Places under surveillance. A GPS unit reporting someone's location around the clock is surveillance in its plainest sense. You do not have to physically follow anyone.
- Without consent. If the person being tracked never agreed, this element is met.
- Harassing and intimidating. The statute defines this as a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that causes emotional distress by placing them in reasonable fear for their safety or the safety of an immediate family member, establishes a pattern of harassing and intimidating behavior, and serves no legitimate purpose.
That last element is the prosecution's real burden. A tracker planted by a jealous ex, a former spouse mid-divorce, or someone the victim has already tried to cut off fits the pattern courts look for. Context like prior threats, repeated unwanted contact, or showing up wherever the victim goes makes the case stronger.
A first offense is a misdemeanor. A second or subsequent conviction is a felony punishable by 1 to 10 years in prison. Judges can also order psychological evaluation and impose permanent restraining conditions at sentencing.
If a protective order, restraining order, bond condition, or probation term already prohibits contact, tracking the protected person becomes aggravated stalking under O.C.G.A. 16-5-91. That is a felony carrying 1 to 10 years and a fine up to $10,000, even for a first offense.
What Georgia's Surveillance Statute Does and Doesn't Cover (O.C.G.A. 16-11-62)
Georgia does have a device surveillance law, O.C.G.A. 16-11-62. Paragraph (2) makes it illegal to use a device to observe, photograph, or record the activities of another person "in any private place and out of public view" without consent.
![]()
Read that language carefully. A car driving on public streets is not in a private place out of public view. Anyone standing on the sidewalk can see where it goes. Because of that language, paragraph (2) generally does not reach a GPS tracker logging a vehicle's movements on public roads.
There is a second and independent reason paragraph (2) does not fit. It reaches only surveillance carried out "through the use of any device," and O.C.G.A. 16-11-60(1) defines a device, for this part of the code, as an instrument for overhearing, recording, intercepting, or transmitting sounds, or for observing, photographing, videotaping, recording, or transmitting visual images.
A GPS tracker captures neither sound nor images. It reports coordinates. So it is not a device under this part at all, and paragraph (2) fails on the definition before the private place question is ever reached.
That definitional gap is why the legislature had to write a standalone paragraph in 2022. Instead of leaning on the defined term, it names a "global positioning system monitoring device, or any other electronic monitoring device."
This is why the stalking statute, not the surveillance statute, is the charge that matters in most Georgia GPS cases. The surveillance law is built for hidden cameras in homes, bathrooms, and other genuinely private spaces, which we cover in our Georgia recording laws guide.
There is one GPS-specific exception, and it sits inside this same statute. Georgia's SB 10 (2022) added the GPS provision to 16-11-62, now codified at paragraph (8). It is unlawful to intentionally and in a clandestine manner place a GPS monitoring device, or any other electronic monitoring device, on a motor vehicle owned or leased by another person without consent, when that person holds a family violence, dating violence, or criminal case protective order, or an out-of-state protective order, against the one planting the device. Unlike stalking, no harassing purpose needs to be proven. The clandestine placement alone is a felony under 16-11-69, punishable by 1 to 5 years.
One myth worth killing: several aggregator sites claim Georgia's SB 539 (2022) regulates GPS tracking. It does not. SB 539 amended the same statute to address photographing and recording patients in county-operated health care facilities. The 2022 bill that actually wrote GPS trackers into Georgia law was SB 10. SB 539 matters here only for numbering: it inserted the patient photography paragraph at (7), which pushed SB 10's GPS provision down to (8).
Who Can Legally Track a Vehicle in Georgia
Ownership and consent do most of the work here.
- Your own car. Legal. You can install a tracker on a vehicle titled to you, including one you lend to others, though tracking a specific person to harass them can still create stalking exposure.
- Co-owned vehicles, including spouses. If both names are on the title, a co-owner can generally consent to a tracker on the jointly owned vehicle. This comes up constantly in divorces. Be careful: judges in family court take a dim view of covert tracking, and using the data to follow, confront, or intimidate your spouse can still satisfy the stalking elements.
- Your minor child's car. Parents who own the vehicle their teenager drives can track it.
- Fleet and business vehicles. Companies can track vehicles they own.
- Lenders and lessors. Trackers installed under a financing or lease agreement you signed are contractual, not covert.
- Private investigators. Georgia gives PIs no exemption from the stalking statute. A licensed investigator who plants a tracker on a car their client does not own takes the same legal risk as anyone else.
What you cannot do is track a vehicle titled solely to another adult without their consent. There is no boyfriend, girlfriend, or "we live together" exception.
Can My Employer Track My Car in Georgia?
Georgia has no statute regulating employer GPS tracking, so the default rules apply.
If you drive a company-owned vehicle, your employer can track it, with or without telling you. The company owns the asset, and Georgia law gives owners broad rights over their own property. Most employers disclose tracking anyway in handbooks or fleet policies.
Tracking an employee's personal vehicle is different. The employer does not own the car, so a covert tracker invites the same stalking analysis as anyone else, plus a civil invasion of privacy claim. Careful Georgia employers get written consent before putting any tracking app or device on a worker's personal car or phone, and limit tracking to work hours.
AirTags and Item Trackers in Georgia
Apple AirTags, Tiles, and similar Bluetooth trackers are legally identical to GPS units in Georgia. The stalking statute cares about the surveillance, not the technology. Dropping an AirTag in someone's bag or magnet-mounting one under their bumper to monitor where they go is the same "placing under surveillance" conduct.
![]()
Modern phones help victims here. iPhones and Android devices alert users when an unknown AirTag is traveling with them, and those alerts have become evidence in stalking prosecutions nationwide.
Crossing state lines does not help the tracker either. The federal stalking statute, 18 U.S.C. 2261A, criminalizes using any electronic device or service to engage in a course of conduct that places a person in reasonable fear or causes substantial emotional distress, including interactive monitoring across state lines.
Penalties for Illegal Tracking in Georgia
| Offense | Statute | Classification | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stalking (first offense) | O.C.G.A. 16-5-90 | Misdemeanor | Up to 12 months in jail and a fine up to $1,000 |
| Stalking (second or subsequent) | O.C.G.A. 16-5-90 | Felony | 1 to 10 years in prison |
| Aggravated stalking (tracking in violation of a protective order, bond, or probation) | O.C.G.A. 16-5-91 | Felony | 1 to 10 years in prison and a fine up to $10,000 |
| Clandestine GPS device on the vehicle of a person with a protective order against you | O.C.G.A. 16-11-62(8), penalized under 16-11-69 | Felony | 1 to 5 years in prison |
| Unlawful surveillance in a private place (hidden devices, not road tracking) | O.C.G.A. 16-11-62, penalized under 16-11-69 | Felony | 1 to 5 years in prison |
| Federal stalking with an electronic device | 18 U.S.C. 2261A | Federal felony | Up to 5 years in prison, more if injury results |
Stalking convictions also carry collateral consequences in Georgia family courts, where tracking evidence routinely affects custody and divorce outcomes.
Civil Lawsuits and Protective Orders
Criminal charges are not the only consequence. Georgia recognizes invasion of privacy claims, including intrusion upon seclusion. A person secretly tracked by an ex, a coworker, or an investigator can sue for damages, and Georgia juries can award punitive damages for malicious conduct.
Victims can also act fast without waiting for prosecutors. O.C.G.A. 16-5-94 lets a stalking victim petition the superior court for a protective order, no arrest required. The order can ban all contact and surveillance, and once it is in place, any further tracking becomes aggravated stalking, a felony. When the order qualifies under O.C.G.A. 16-11-62(8), clandestinely planting a GPS device on the protected person's vehicle is a separate felony on top. Our guide to Georgia restraining order laws walks through the filing process step by step.
What to Do If You Find a Tracker on Your Car
- Do not destroy it. The device is evidence, and it may carry fingerprints, a serial number, or account data that identifies who planted it.
- Photograph it in place before touching anything. Capture where it was mounted, wiring, and any magnets or cases.
- Call the police and ask them to document and remove it. Mention Georgia's stalking statute, O.C.G.A. 16-5-90, since some officers assume GPS tracking is unregulated here.
- Write down your timeline. Note anyone who seemed to know your location when they should not have. That pattern supports the harassing and intimidating element.
- Consider a stalking protective order under 16-5-94 if you suspect who did it.
- Check your phone and accounts too. Stalkers often pair a vehicle tracker with phone location sharing, shared iCloud or Google accounts, or stalkerware apps.
![]()
If you spot a hidden camera rather than a tracker, different statutes apply. See our surveillance camera laws guide for that scenario.
For rules in other states, see our hub on GPS Tracking Laws by State. Related Georgia guides: Georgia recording laws and Georgia restraining order laws.
Sources
- Official Code of Georgia Annotated, Georgia General Assembly (O.C.G.A. §§ 16-5-90, 16-5-91, 16-5-94, 16-11-60, 16-11-62)
- Georgia Senate Bill 10 (2022), as signed, adding the GPS monitoring device paragraph to O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62
- Georgia Senate Bill 539 (2022), as signed, amending O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62
- Georgia Attorney General Official Opinion 95-17 (first offense stalking under § 16-5-90 designated a misdemeanor)
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), slip opinion
- 18 U.S.C. § 2261A: Federal Stalking Statute
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information about GPS tracking laws in Georgia as of June 2026. It is not legal advice. Laws change, and how they apply depends on your specific facts. Consult a licensed Georgia attorney before acting on anything you read here.
More Georgia Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal to put a GPS tracker on someone's car in Georgia?
Yes, if the car belongs to someone else and you do not have consent. Georgia prosecutes covert vehicle tracking under its stalking statute, O.C.G.A. 16-5-90, which bans placing a person under surveillance without consent for the purpose of harassing and intimidating them. A first offense is a misdemeanor and repeat offenses are felonies.
Can I put a tracker on my spouse's car in Georgia?
If the vehicle is jointly titled to both of you, a co-owner can generally consent to a tracker on the shared car. If the car is titled solely to your spouse, secretly tracking it risks a stalking charge, and family court judges often punish covert surveillance in divorce and custody rulings regardless of criminal exposure.
Does Georgia have a specific GPS tracking device law?
Mostly no. Georgia never passed a general statute aimed at electronic tracking devices the way Texas or California did. The one GPS-specific rule is the GPS provision SB 10 added to O.C.G.A. 16-11-62 in 2022, now codified at paragraph (8), which makes it a felony to clandestinely place a tracker on a vehicle owned or leased by someone who holds a protective order against the person placing it. Everything else falls to the stalking law, O.C.G.A. 16-5-90.
Are AirTags illegal in Georgia?
AirTags themselves are legal to buy and use on your own property, luggage, and vehicles. Using one to secretly track a person is treated the same as GPS tracking and can be charged as stalking under O.C.G.A. 16-5-90, or as federal stalking under 18 U.S.C. 2261A if the conduct crosses state lines.
Can my employer put a GPS tracker on my personal car in Georgia?
Not without your consent. Georgia has no employer tracking statute, but your employer does not own your personal vehicle, so a covert tracker creates stalking and invasion of privacy exposure. Employers can freely track company-owned vehicles, and most disclose this in fleet policies.
Can police in Georgia track my car with GPS without a warrant?
Generally no. In United States v. Jones, the U.S. Supreme Court held that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and monitoring it is a Fourth Amendment search, which normally requires a warrant. Evidence from warrantless police tracking is usually suppressed.
What are the penalties for GPS stalking in Georgia?
A first stalking conviction is a misdemeanor punishable by up to 12 months in jail and a $1,000 fine. A second conviction is a felony carrying 1 to 10 years. Tracking someone in violation of a protective order is aggravated stalking, a felony with 1 to 10 years and up to a $10,000 fine.
What should I do if I find a GPS tracker on my car in Georgia?
Photograph the device where you found it, avoid destroying it, and call the police so they can document and remove it as evidence. Keep a log of incidents where someone knew your location, and consider petitioning for a stalking protective order under O.C.G.A. 16-5-94.
Updates
Corrected how the page describes the origin of Georgia's GPS tracking provision: SB 10 (2022) added it to O.C.G.A. 16-11-62 as paragraph (7) and it is codified at paragraph (8) today, and added the statutory definition of "device" that independently keeps the general surveillance paragraph from reaching vehicle trackers.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Official Code of Georgia Annotated
§ 16-5-90Stalking; psychological evaluation.In forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a)(1) A person commits the offense of stalking when he or she follows, places under surveillance, or contacts another person at or about a place or places without the consent of the other person for the purpose of harassing and intimidating the other person.…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-26 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at gcfv.georgia.gov
Cited in 167 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Chan v. Ellis (2015) held that website commentary directed only to the public is not "contact" under OCGA 16-5-90 (a)(1), which reaches communication aimed at a specific person without consent. Johnson v. State (1994) rejected vagueness and overbreadth challenges, reading "contact" with the harassing and intimidating purpose element.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Chan v. Ellis (Supreme Court of Georgia 2015, 296 Ga. 838)✓A website operator hosted nearly 2,000 posts about a poet, who won a stalking injunction; the court held commentary directed only to the public is not "contact" under OCGA 16-5-90(a)(1), and that she failed to prove any contact was without her consent, so it reversed.
- Johnson v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia 1994, 264 Ga. 590)✓A defendant convicted of misdemeanor stalking and burglary argued OCGA 16-5-90 was vague and overbroad; the court held "contact" is readily understood and the statute reaches only a knowing and willful course of conduct done to harass and intimidate, and it affirmed.
- Troncalli v. Jones (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1999, 237 Ga. App. 10)✓A woman won a jury verdict against a man who touched her breasts at a party, chased her car and made a throat cutting gesture; the court held OCGA 16-5-90 defines a crime and creates no private tort of stalking, so the general verdict could not stand and was reversed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia Laws on Recording in Public: What Is Legal (2026), Georgia Video Recording Laws: All-Party Consent in Private Places (2026), Georgia Employee Monitoring Laws: Employer Rules (2026)
§ 16-11-62Eavesdropping, surveillance, or intercepting communication which invades privacy of another; divulging private message.In forcecited in 25 of our articles
It shall be unlawful for: (1) Any person in a clandestine manner intentionally to overhear, transmit, or record or attempt to overhear, transmit, or record the private conversation of another which shall originate in any private place; (2) Any person, through the use of any device, without the
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.ga.gov
Cited in 94 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Kelley v. State (1998) held OCGA 16-11-62(2) reached a guardian who photographed a nude 16-year-old in the family bathroom, with no exception for family members. Burgeson v. State (1996) held a conversation recorded in a patrol car was not covered, because no reasonable expectation of privacy existed there.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Burgeson v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia 1996, 267 Ga. 102)✓Police secretly recorded two arrestees talking in the back of a patrol car. The court held a police car is much like a jail cell, with no reasonable expectation of privacy, so intercepting that conversation did not offend OCGA 16-11-62 and the tape was admissible.
- Kelley v. State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1998, 233 Ga. App. 244)✓A guardian photographed her 16-year-old niece nude and passed out in the family bathtub. The court held OCGA 16-11-62(2) reaches any person with no family exception, that the film need not be developed, and that a jury could find the bathroom a private place.
- Dobbins v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia 1992, 262 Ga. 161)“…th the consent of one of the parties to the conversation. OCGA § 16-11-62 (1) provides that: It shall be unlawf…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia Data Privacy Laws: Breach Notification & Consumer Rights (2026), Georgia Ring Doorbell Laws: What You Need to Know in 2026, Georgia Surveillance Camera Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 16-5-91Aggravated stalking.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) A person commits the offense of aggravated stalking when such person, in violation of a bond to keep the peace posted pursuant to Code Section 17-6-110, temporary restraining order, temporary protective order, permanent restraining order, permanent protective order, preliminary injunction, good…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2021-08-17 · Read the full text in our law library
Cited in 144 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Louisyr v. State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2011, 307 Ga. App. 724)“…victed of two counts of aggravated stalking in violation of OCGA § 16-5-91. He now appeals from the denial of his…”
- Littleton v. State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1997, 225 Ga. App. 900)“…A § 16-6-1), burglary (OCGA § 16-7-1), aggravated stalking (OCGA § 16-5-91), and aggravated assault with a deadly…”
- Phillips v. State (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2006, 278 Ga. App. 198)“…he purpose of harassing and intimidating the other person.” OCGA § 16-5-91 (a). The phrase “harassing and intimida…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Georgia Restraining Order Laws (2026): How to Get a Protective Order
§ 16-5-94Restraining orders; protective orders.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) A person who is not a minor who alleges stalking by another person may seek a restraining order by filing a petition alleging conduct constituting stalking as defined in Code Section 16-5-90. A person who is not a minor may also seek relief on behalf of a minor by filing such a petition. (b) Ju
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-04 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.ga.gov
Cited in 79 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Thornton v. Hemphill (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2009, 300 Ga. App. 647)“…protective order is proof by preponderance of the evidence. OCGA §§ 16-5-94 (e); 19-13-3 (c). In reviewing the suff…”
- Elgin v. Swann (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2012, 315 Ga. App. 809)“…h stalking protective order entered against her pursuant to OCGA § 16-5-94 (d). We find that, although the protect…”
- Rawcliffe v. Rawcliffe (Court of Appeals of Georgia 2007, 283 Ga. App. 264)“…Court of Cobb County for a 12-month protective order under OCGA § 16-5-94 to enjoin Ara Rawcliffe, her sister-in-…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 18
§ 2261AStalkingIn forcecited in 53 of our articles
Whoever— travels in interstate or foreign commerce or is present within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or enters or leaves Indian country, with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel or presence engages in conduct that— places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to— that person; an immediate family member (as defined in section 115) of that person; a spouse or intimate partner of that person; or the pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse of that person; or causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to a person described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of subparagraph (A); or with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, uses the mail, any interactive computer service or electronic communication service or electronic communication system of interstate commerce, or any other…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 350 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Federal appeals courts have construed and upheld Section 2261A. United States v. Walker (2011) read in the course of, or as a result of such travel disjunctively, so pre-travel threats plus resulting fear sufficed. United States v. Amy Gonzalez (2018) held it neither overbroad nor vague and no First Amendment violation as applied.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- United States v. Walker (Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 2011, 665 F.3d 212)✓After emailing threats to his estranged wife, the defendant flew from Michigan to Puerto Rico and was arrested on arrival. The court read the disjunctive phrase in 2261A(1) to cover travel that itself places the target in reasonable fear, and upheld the stalking conviction.
- United States v. Amy Gonzalez (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2018, 905 F.3d 165)✓Relatives waged a years-long campaign against a mother that ended in a courthouse shooting. The court held 2261A is neither overbroad nor vague because it reaches harassing conduct, and that the mental states it lists are alternative means, not elements; convictions affirmed.
- United States v. Wills (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2003, 346 F.3d 476)✓A burglary suspect pursued the witness who identified him at a preliminary hearing; the witness later died. The court held the evidence met each element of 2261A: travel from D.C. to Virginia, intent to harm or harass, and reasonable fear of death; conviction affirmed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Colorado GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026), Florida GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Official Code of Georgia Annotated, Georgia General Assembly (O.C.G.A. 16-5-90, 16-5-91, 16-5-94, 16-11-60, 16-11-62)(legis.ga.gov)
- Georgia Senate Bill 539 (2022), as signed, amending O.C.G.A. 16-11-62(gov.georgia.gov)
- Georgia Attorney General Official Opinion 95-17, first offense stalking designated a misdemeanor(law.georgia.gov)
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), slip opinion(supremecourt.gov)
- 18 U.S.C. 2261A, federal stalking statute(law.cornell.edu)
- Georgia Senate Bill 10 (2022), as signed, adding the GPS monitoring device paragraph to O.C.G.A. 16-11-62(gov.georgia.gov)