Maine
Maine Drone Laws: Police Warrant Rules & Privacy Explained
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Maine requires police to get a warrant, and often the Attorney General's sign-off, before flying a drone for a criminal investigation under 25 M.R.S. Section 4501. Private citizen disputes fall back on Maine's narrower general privacy and trespass law instead.
Federal Airspace Rules vs. Maine State Law
The Federal Aviation Administration regulates the national airspace nationwide: registration, Remote Pilot Certification under Part 107, the recreational exception at 49 U.S.C. 44809, and Remote ID broadcast. States cannot regulate flight altitude or airspace access; that authority is federal. What Maine regulates instead, more thoroughly than most states, is how its own law enforcement agencies may use a drone once it is in the air, plus a general privacy statute that protects residents from being recorded in narrowly defined private places. Maine has not enacted a critical-infrastructure drone statute comparable to some other states, so outside the law-enforcement and hunting contexts, general common-law trespass and nuisance principles fill the gap.

Maine's Law Enforcement Drone Warrant Requirement
25 M.R.S. Section 4501 generally bars a Maine law enforcement agency from using a drone for a criminal investigation without a warrant, except under a recognized exception to the warrant requirement under the Maine or United States Constitution. The statute separately permits warrantless drone use for aerial photography to assess "accidents, forest fires and other fire scenes, flood stages and storm damage," for search-and-rescue operations "necessary to alleviate an immediate danger to any person" and "training exercises related to such uses," and for an emergency use approved by the agency's chief administrative officer or the Governor.
Section 4501(4)(A) provides that an agency "may not use an unmanned aerial vehicle before adopting standards that meet, at a minimum, the standards set forth in subsection 5." That bar is not absolute: paragraphs (C), (D) and (G) each open with "Notwithstanding paragraph A," so the search-and-rescue, non-criminal-investigation, and chief-administrative-officer- or Governor-approved emergency uses described above are available even before an agency adopts its written standards. Standards are what the statute requires before an agency uses a drone for anything outside those three carve-outs, and any deployment specifically for a criminal investigation additionally requires approval from the Attorney General or the chief prosecuting attorney for the relevant jurisdiction.
Those minimum standards, set out in the statute, must cover officer training, the chain of authorization before a flight, restrictions on technology including night vision, high-powered zoom, facial recognition, thermal imaging, and video analytics, data retention and destruction schedules, and deployment limits. The responsible commissioner must also report annually to the Legislature on drone deployments and warrant activity, a transparency requirement most states lack.
Portland's police department put these rules on public display in 2026. The city council approved a $45,316 purchase of the department's first drone, a Skydio aircraft supplied through Axon, on March 3, 2026, reversing a 4-3 rejection from November 2025 after weeks of public pushback. Councilor April Fournier and several residents raised concerns that Axon's cloud storage and its Department of Homeland Security contract could expose Portland's drone footage to federal agencies; the council responded by adding explicit language reiterating the state law's ban on surveilling protected speech and assembly. Police Chief Mark Dubois said the city, not Axon, controls the footage and does not share it with federal agencies.
Weaponization and Free Speech Protections
Section 4501 states plainly that "in no case may a weaponized unmanned aerial vehicle be used or its use facilitated by a state or local law enforcement agency" in Maine, with no exception. The statute separately bars a law enforcement agency from using a drone "to conduct surveillance of private citizens peacefully exercising their constitutional rights of free speech and assembly." Both restrictions apply regardless of whether the agency has a warrant; they are absolute limits on what a Maine police drone can be used for, not warrant-requirement exceptions.
Can My Neighbor Legally Fly a Drone Over My Property in Maine?
Section 4501 governs law enforcement, not private citizens, so a dispute between neighbors falls back on Maine's general privacy and trespass law. 17-A M.R.S. Section 511, Maine's violation-of-privacy statute, makes it a Class D crime to intentionally install or use a device to observe, photograph, or record a person in a "private place" without consent, or to use a device outside a private place to capture images or sounds that would not ordinarily be visible or audible from outside it. The statute defines a private place as one "where one may reasonably expect to be safe from surveillance, including, but not limited to, changing or dressing rooms, bathrooms and similar places." Section 511(3) says flatly that "violation of privacy is a Class D crime," and the statute creates no enhanced tier above that: paragraphs (E) and (F) of subsection 1, which cover the same conduct against a person who "has not in fact attained 16 years of age" and that conduct done "for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire" of the offender or another, are alternative ways of committing the same Class D offense rather than a higher grade of it.
That definition is narrower than the drone-privacy statutes some other states have adopted, since an open backyard or a driveway generally is not a "private place" in the statutory sense, even if a resident would rather not be filmed there. A drone that repeatedly hovers low over a fenced yard, disrupts a resident's use of their property, or captures footage through a window into an interior space is more likely to raise a viable trespass, nuisance, or Section 511 claim than one that simply passes overhead in transit. Maine's separate harassment statute can also come into play if a neighbor uses a drone as a tool of an ongoing course of conduct meant to alarm or annoy, distinct from a single overflight. For the roughly dozen states that have adopted a dedicated civilian drone-privacy statute reaching further than Maine's, see Drone Laws by State.
Drones and Hunting in Maine
Maine has no statute written specifically about drones and hunting, but its general aircraft-and-wildlife provisions reach drones by definition, and readers should not assume the gap other states have filled exists here. 12 M.R.S. Section 11216 provides that "a person on the ground or airborne may not use an aircraft to aid or assist in hunting" bear, deer, or moose. 12 M.R.S. Section 10001(1) defines "aircraft," for that entire Part of the fish and wildlife laws, as "a machine or device designed for flight," which on its face covers an unmanned aircraft.
A violation of Section 11216 where no animal is taken is a civil violation carrying a fine of not less than $100 and not more than $500. If an animal is taken, it is a Class E crime and the court must impose a fine of at least $500, none of which may be suspended. A person with three or more prior civil violations within the previous five years commits a Class E crime even without taking an animal. Separately, 12 M.R.S. Section 11215 makes it a Class E crime to intentionally kill, injure, or molest a wild animal or wild bird with an aircraft.
Maine has not enacted a felony-tier critical-infrastructure drone statute comparable to the handful of other states that have one, so a drone flown near a power plant would be analyzed under general trespass and criminal mischief principles rather than a dedicated drone statute. Readers relying on this article for a use case outside ordinary neighbor disputes, hunting, or law enforcement should confirm there has been no subsequent amendment.
Can I Shoot Down a Drone Over My Property in Maine?
No. Federal law, not Maine law, controls this question. The Aircraft Sabotage Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 32, makes it a felony to willfully damage, destroy, or disable an "aircraft," a category the FAA has treated as including drones since 2012, regardless of the altitude or whose property the drone is over. A conviction carries up to 20 years in federal prison and a fine of up to $250,000. Publicized cases where a shooter faced only reduced or dismissed state charges, like Kentucky's 2015 "Kentucky Drone Slayer" incident, reflect local prosecutorial discretion, not a legal right to disable a drone; the drone owner's related federal suit, Boggs v. Merideth, was dismissed in 2017 on jurisdictional grounds without the court ever reaching the merits. No Maine statute authorizes a property owner to shoot down or otherwise disable a drone. For the camera side of Maine privacy law, including home security and workplace cameras, see Maine Surveillance Camera Laws.
Recreational and Commercial Drone Flights, and Acadia's Drone Ban
Whether a Maine flight is recreational or commercial is a federal, not a state, question. A hobbyist flies under 49 U.S.C. 44809 after passing the free TRUST safety test; anyone flying for business, including aerial photography of Maine's coastline or agricultural mapping, needs an FAA Remote Pilot Certificate under Part 107. Both groups must register any drone over 0.55 pounds with the FAA and broadcast Remote ID, and a flight near controlled airspace, such as around the Portland International Jetport, needs a LAANC or DroneZone authorization before takeoff. Separately, and this trips up a lot of visitors, the National Park Service has banned launching, landing, or operating a drone anywhere within a unit it administers since a 2014 policy memorandum issued under 36 CFR 1.5. That ban applies in full to Acadia National Park, Maine's most visited park, regardless of whether the flight would otherwise be legal under Maine or federal aviation law; a superintendent can grant a special use permit for research or search-and-rescue use, but recreational and most commercial flights are prohibited without one.
Penalties at a Glance
| Conduct | Statute | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Law enforcement drone use for a criminal investigation without a warrant or AG approval | 25 M.R.S. Section 4501 | Agency accountability under Sections 2803-C and 2806-A; evidence and deployment subject to legislative reporting |
| Weaponizing a law enforcement drone | 25 M.R.S. Section 4501 | Prohibited outright, no exception |
| Installing or using a device to observe/record a person in a private place without consent | 17-A M.R.S. Section 511 | Class D crime |
| The same conduct against a person under 16, or for the purpose of sexual arousal against a person under 16 | 17-A M.R.S. Section 511(1)(E), (F) | Class D crime (alternative means of the same offense, not a higher grade) |
| Using an aircraft, including a drone, to aid or assist in hunting bear, deer, or moose | 12 M.R.S. Section 11216 | Civil violation, $100 to $500; Class E crime with a mandatory $500 minimum fine if an animal is taken |
| Intentionally killing, injuring, or molesting a wild animal or bird with an aircraft | 12 M.R.S. Section 11215 | Class E crime |
| Shooting down or disabling any drone (private citizen, anywhere in the US) | 18 U.S.C. Section 32 | Up to 20 years and $250,000 fine (federal) |
More Maine Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does police need a warrant to fly a drone over my property in Maine?
Yes, for a criminal investigation. Under 25 M.R.S. Section 4501, a Maine law enforcement agency generally needs both a warrant and approval from the Attorney General or the local chief prosecuting attorney before deploying a drone to investigate a crime, unless a recognized constitutional exception to the warrant requirement applies.
Can Maine police use a drone without a warrant for anything?
Yes, for defined non-criminal purposes. Section 4501 allows warrantless drone use to assess accidents, wildfires, floods, and storm damage, for search-and-rescue operations necessary to alleviate immediate danger, for training exercises related to those search-and-rescue uses, and for emergencies approved by the agency's chief administrative officer or the Governor.
Can my neighbor legally fly a drone over my yard in Maine?
Maine has no drone-specific civilian privacy statute. The general violation-of-privacy law, 17-A M.R.S. Section 511, only covers a narrowly defined "private place" such as a bathroom or changing room, so it may not reach a drone simply flying over an open backyard. Repeated, low, or harassing flights could still raise trespass or nuisance claims under general Maine law.
Can I use a drone to help me hunt in Maine?
Not for bear, deer, or moose. 12 M.R.S. Section 11216 bars a person on the ground or airborne from using an aircraft to aid or assist in hunting those animals, and 12 M.R.S. Section 10001(1) defines an aircraft as a machine or device designed for flight, which covers a drone. A violation is a civil violation carrying a $100 to $500 fine, or a Class E crime with a mandatory $500 minimum fine if an animal is taken.
Can Maine police use facial recognition on drone footage?
Only within the technology limits set by the minimum standards Maine law enforcement agencies must adopt under Section 4501; those standards specifically restrict facial recognition, thermal imaging, high-powered zoom, and video analytics. An agency must adopt them before using a drone for anything other than the search-and-rescue, non-criminal, and approved-emergency uses the statute allows notwithstanding that requirement.
Are weaponized drones legal for Maine law enforcement?
No. Section 4501 states that a weaponized unmanned aerial vehicle may not be used, or its use facilitated, by any state or local law enforcement agency in Maine, without exception.
Can I shoot down a drone flying over my property in Maine?
No. Federal law, not Maine law, controls this question. The Aircraft Sabotage Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 32, makes damaging or destroying any drone a federal felony carrying up to 20 years in prison, regardless of where it is flying or whose property it is over.
Can police use a drone to monitor a protest in Maine?
No. Section 4501 expressly bars a Maine law enforcement agency from using a drone to conduct surveillance of private citizens who are peacefully exercising their constitutional rights of free speech and assembly.
Can I fly my drone in Acadia National Park?
No, not without a special use permit. A 2014 National Park Service policy memorandum, issued under 36 CFR 1.5, bans launching, landing, or operating a drone anywhere within an NPS unit, including Acadia National Park. This is a federal rule that applies regardless of Maine state law or the drone's FAA registration status.
Updates
Corrected Maine's law enforcement drone rules to reflect the search-and-rescue, non-criminal and emergency uses allowed before an agency adopts written standards, narrowed the training-exercise exception to its statutory wording, corrected the violation-of-privacy penalty to Class D with no aggravated tier, and added Maine's aircraft-and-hunting prohibitions, which the page had previously said did not exist.
Corrected the description of 17-A M.R.S. Section 511's sexual-arousal aggravator, which the statute applies only together with an under-16 victim (not as a standalone factor for any victim), and fixed a misspelling of the case name Boggs v. Merideth.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Removed the repealed 17-A M.R.S. Section 1252 citation and the unconfirmed '364 days / $2,000 fine' figures it supported, leaving the Section 511 violation-of-privacy penalty stated at the confirmed Class D crime classification.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 25: INTERNAL SECURITY AND PUBLIC SAFETY, Part 12: UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES, Chapter 551: REGULATION OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES
§ 4501Regulation of unmanned aerial vehiclesIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
1. Findings. The Legislature finds that evolving technology regarding unmanned aerial vehicles presents a potential economic driver for the State, an opportunity for research and development and a very real benefit for security, for search and rescue efforts and for disaster prevention and relief, as well as a tool for the investigation of serious crimes, but the technology also presents a potential threat to the privacy of citizens of this State if used by law enforcement in the conduct of criminal investigations without appropriate guidelines and supervision. 2. Definitions. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise indicates, the following terms have the following meanings. A. "Law enforcement agency" has the same meaning as in section 3701, subsection 1. [PL 2015, c. 307, §1 (NEW).] B. "Unmanned aerial vehicle" means an aircraft operated without a physical human presence within or on the aircraft that, in the manner in which the aircraft is used or the manner in which it is equipped, is capable of performing audio or visual surveillance. [PL 2015, c. 307, §1 (NEW).] 3. Acquisition of unmanned aerial vehicles.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Also relied on in: Maine Laws on Recording in Public: Your Complete Guide (2026), Maine Video Recording Laws: Public Filming, Private Property, and Consent (2026)
Maine Revised Statutes, Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE, Part 2: SUBSTANTIVE OFFENSES, Chapter 21: OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER
§ 511Violation of privacyIn forcecited in 15 of our articles
1. A person is guilty of violation of privacy if, except in the execution of a public duty or as authorized by law, that person intentionally: A. Commits a civil trespass on property with the intent to overhear or observe any person in a private place; [PL 1997, c. 467, §1 (AMD).] B. Installs or uses in a private place without the consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy in that place, any device for observing, photographing, recording, amplifying or broadcasting sounds or events in that place; [PL 1997, c. 467, §1 (AMD).] C. Installs or uses outside a private place without the consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy therein any device for observing, photographing, hearing, recording, amplifying or broadcasting images or sounds originating in that place that would not ordinarily be visible, audible or comprehensible outside that place; [PL 2023, c. 227, §1 (AMD).] D.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.maine.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):In State of Maine v. Mark W. Strong Sr. (2013) the Maine Supreme Judicial Court read section 511(1)(B) to require an objectively reasonable expectation of being safe from surveillance, and held that people who entered a place solely to engage a prostitute were not persons entitled to privacy there.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State of Maine v. Mark W. Strong Sr. (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2013, 60 A.3d 1286)✓A man faced 45 counts of violation of privacy for recording the clients of a Kennebunk prostitute; the Law Court held that people present solely to engage a prostitute were not 'persons entitled to privacy' there, so the indictment failed to charge the offense.
- Friedman v. Public Utilities Commission (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2012, 48 A.3d 794)“…statutes: 17-A M.R.S. § 402(1) (2011) (criminal trespass), 17-A M.R.S. § 511 (2011) (criminal violation of privacy),…”
- Cuso Mortgage Corp. v. Gauthier (Superior Court of Maine 2012)“…e counts of criminal invasion of privacy, presumably under 17-A M.R.S. § 511(1)(B), for allegedly filming sexual act…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Maine Recording Laws (2026): One-Party Consent, § 710 and § 511, Maine Audio Recording Laws: One-Party Consent Rules and Penalties (2026), Maine Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Defenses (2026)
United States Code Title 18
§ 32Destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilitiesIn forcecited in 51 of our articles
Whoever willfully— sets fire to, damages, destroys, disables, or wrecks any aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States or any civil aircraft used, operated, or employed in interstate, overseas, or foreign air commerce; places or causes to be placed a destructive device or substance in, upon, or in proximity to, or otherwise makes or causes to be made unworkable or unusable or hazardous to work or use, any such aircraft, or any part or other materials used or intended to be used in connection with the operation of such aircraft, if such placing or causing to be placed or such making or causing to be made is likely to endanger the safety of any such aircraft; sets fire to, damages, destroys, or disables any air navigation facility, or interferes by force or violence with the operation of such facility, if such fire, damaging, destroying, disabling, or interfering is likely to endanger the safety of any such aircraft in flight; with the intent to damage, destroy, or disable any such aircraft, sets fire to, damages, destroys, or disables or places a destructive device or substance in, upon, or in proximity to, any appliance or structure, ramp, landing area,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 168 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):United States v. Yousef (2003) applied 18 U.S.C. 32 to an overseas airline bombing plot, holding Section 32(a) reaches conduct abroad because US-flag aircraft in flight are within the special aircraft jurisdiction, and that a defendant brought here involuntarily is still found in the United States under Section 32(b).
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Perez v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1971, 402 U.S. 146)“…commerce, as, for example, the destruction of an aircraft ( 18 U. S. C. § 32 ), or persons or things in commerce, as…”
- Stanford v. Kentucky (Supreme Court of the United States 1989, 492 U.S. 361)“…r by persons subject to Uniform Code of Military Justice); 18 U. S. C. §§ 32 , 33, and 34 (1982 ed. and Supp. V) (de…”
- United States v. Yousef (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2003, 327 F.3d 56)✓Yousef bombed a Philippine airliner and plotted to bomb twelve US flag airliners on Asian routes; the court held Section 32(a) reaches attacks on US flag aircraft worldwide, and that Yousef, brought here involuntarily, was found in the United States under Section 32(b).
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: California Drone Laws (2026): Privacy, Fires & Shoot-Down Rules, Oregon Drone Laws 2026: Police Warrants, Privacy & Penalties, Connecticut Drone Laws (2026): Privacy & Penalties
United States Code Title 49
§ 44809Exception for limited recreational operations of unmanned aircraftIn forcecited in 12 of our articles
Except as provided in subsection (e), and notwithstanding chapter 447 of title 49, United States Code, a person may operate a small unmanned aircraft without specific certification or operating authority from the Federal Aviation Administration if the operation adheres to all of the following limitations: The aircraft is flown strictly for recreational purposes. The aircraft is operated in accordance with or within the programming of a community-based organization’s set of safety guidelines that are developed in coordination with the Federal Aviation Administration. The aircraft is flown within the visual line of sight of the person operating the aircraft or a visual observer co-located and in direct communication with the operator. The aircraft is operated in a manner that does not interfere with and gives way to any manned aircraft. In Class B, Class C, or Class D airspace or within the lateral boundaries of the surface area of Class E airspace designated for an airport, the operator obtains prior authorization from the Administrator or designee before operating and complies with all airspace restrictions and prohibitions.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Tyler Brennan v. Stephen Dickson (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 2022, 45 F.4th 48)“…Reauthorization Act, § 349(a), (b), (f), 132 Stat. at 3297; 49 U.S.C. § 44809(f); see Final Rule, 86 Fed. Reg. at 440…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Florida Drone Laws 2026: Privacy, Warrants & Penalties, Hawaii Drone Laws 2026: Trespass, Privacy & Warrants, Idaho Drone Laws (2026): Privacy, Police Warrants, and Hunting Rules
Code of Federal Regulations Title 36
§ 1.5Closures and public use limits.In force
(a) Consistent with applicable legislation and Federal administrative policies, and based upon a determination that such action is necessary for the maintenance of public health and safety, protection of environmental or scenic values, protection of natural or cultural resources, aid to scientific research, implementation of management responsibilities, equitable allocation and use of facilities, or the avoidance of conflict among visitor use activities, the superintendent may: (1) Establish, for all or a portion of a park area, a reasonable schedule of visiting hours, impose public use limits, or close all or a portion of a park area to all public use or to a specific use or activity. (2) Designate areas for a specific use or activity, or impose conditions or restrictions on a use or activity. (3) Terminate a restriction, limit, closure, designation, condition, or visiting hour restriction imposed under paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 41 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Voyageurs National Park Ass'n v. Norton (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 2004, 381 F.3d 759)“…and use of Voyageurs. Two of these Park Service regulations–36 C.F.R. §§ 1.5 and 7.33–are implicated in this appeal.…”
- Mausolf v. Babbitt (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 1997, 125 F.3d 661)“…utes that govern the management of all national parks, see 36 C.F.R. § 1.5 (a), or from regulations promulgated to…”
- Henke v. Department of the Interior (District Court, District of Columbia 2012, 842 F. Supp. 2d 54)“…in the event NPS decides to close McPherson Square under 36 C.F.R. § 1.5 and seizes tents in connection with su…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- 25 M.R.S. Section 4501: Regulation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (Maine Legislature)(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- 17-A M.R.S. Section 511: Violation of Privacy (Maine Legislature)(legislature.maine.gov).gov
- 18 U.S.C. Section 32: Destruction of Aircraft or Aircraft Facilities (Cornell LII)(law.cornell.edu)
- Portland Press Herald: Portland Approves Purchase of Police Drone After Delaying Decision Last Fall(pressherald.com)
- FAA: State and Local Regulation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems(faa.gov).gov
- National Park Service: Uncrewed Aircraft in the National Parks(nps.gov).gov
- 12 M.R.S. Section 11216: Use of Aircraft While Hunting (Maine Legislature)(legislature.maine.gov)
- 12 M.R.S. Section 10001: Definitions, Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (Maine Legislature)(legislature.maine.gov)
- 12 M.R.S. Section 11215: Killing Wildlife with a Motor Vehicle, Motorboat or Aircraft (Maine Legislature)(legislature.maine.gov)