Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania Debt Collection Laws: The Wage Garnishment Ban and Its Exact Exceptions
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 12, 2026). · 7 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

No debt collector can garnish a Pennsylvania paycheck for a credit card, a medical bill, a personal loan, or any other ordinary consumer debt. That is not internet folklore; it is the plain text of 42 Pa.C.S. Section 8127, which exempts wages, salaries, and commissions from attachment "while in the hands of the employer" except for a short, exact list of carve-outs. But the popular version of this rule, "garnishment is illegal in Pennsylvania," is wrong in two directions at once. Several creditor types can and do reach Pennsylvania wages, and the protection evaporates the moment a paycheck lands in a bank account. A creditor also still has to follow the normal process for everything else: sue, win a judgment, then execute on non-wage property. Most collection judgments in Pennsylvania, as everywhere, are default judgments entered because nobody answered the complaint, so answering the lawsuit remains the single most valuable thing a Pennsylvania debtor can do.
The General Rule: Wages Are Off Limits to Ordinary Creditors
Section 8127(a) of Pennsylvania's Judicial Code states that "the wages, salaries and commissions of individuals shall while in the hands of the employer be exempt from any attachment, execution or other process" except in the enumerated actions discussed below. There is no percentage formula for ordinary consumer debt because there is no wage garnishment remedy to apply a percentage to. A judgment creditor holding a credit card judgment, a deficiency judgment, a tort judgment, or a business debt simply cannot serve a wage attachment on a Pennsylvania employer.
That makes Pennsylvania one of a handful of states, alongside Texas, North Carolina, and South Carolina, where the practical answer to "can they garnish my paycheck for this credit card judgment" is no. It does not make judgments harmless. A Pennsylvania judgment creditor can still levy bank accounts, place liens on real estate, and execute against personal property, and the judgment accrues interest while it sits.
The Exact Exception List in Section 8127
The carve-outs matter because they are routinely misquoted. The statute permits wage attachment only in an action or proceeding:
- Under 23 Pa.C.S. Part IV, relating to divorce, which covers obligations arising out of divorce proceedings.
- For support. Child and spousal support are collected through income withholding, subject to the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act ceilings of 50 to 65 percent of disposable earnings. See Pennsylvania child support laws for that separate regime.
- For board for four weeks or less, a narrow historical carve-out for short-term room and board debts.
- For residential landlord judgments under subsection (a)(3.1): a judgment creditor-landlord may attach wages for amounts awarded in a residential lease judgment, capped at the lesser of 10 percent of net wages per pay period or an amount that keeps the tenant above federal poverty guidelines. This is the "back rent" exception, and it is far narrower than most summaries suggest.
- For PHEAA student loan obligations under the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency Act. Federal student loans do not need this exception; they pierce state law on their own, as explained below.
- For restitution to crime victims, costs, fines, or bail judgments arising from criminal proceedings.
Subsection (f) adds a narrow shield for abuse victims, and its limits matter. It bars a wage attachment against an abused person or victim only for physical damages related to a residential lease, and only where that person holds a protection from abuse order under 23 Pa.C.S. Section 6101 et seq., holds a protective order under 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4954, or is a victim-witness, in a matter involving a family or household member, and the court determines that the family or household member caused the damage. It does not touch the other exceptions: a protection order does not stop attachment for support, for divorce obligations, for PHEAA student loans, or for criminal restitution, fines, costs, or bail. Subsection (b) sets the priority when the permitted attachments stack: support first, crime victim restitution second.
Taxes and Federal Debts Pierce Separately
Here is the detail nearly every summary of Pennsylvania law gets wrong: taxes are not in the Section 8127 exception list. The Pennsylvania Department of Revenue nonetheless garnishes wages for delinquent state taxes, because it operates under entirely separate authority, Act 46 of 2003. Under that program the Department can order an employer to withhold up to 10 percent of gross wages, with no court order and no judgment, after sending a Notice of Intent to Garnish at least 30 days in advance. The employer may keep 2 percent of the collected amounts as an administrative fee, and the garnishment continues until the liability is satisfied.

Federal debts pierce Pennsylvania's wage bar too. A defaulted federal student loan triggers administrative wage garnishment of up to 15 percent of disposable pay under federal law, which by its own terms operates regardless of state garnishment law. The IRS can levy wages for federal taxes under its own exemption-table system. No state statute stops either one.
The Protection Ends at the Bank
Section 8127's text protects wages only "while in the hands of the employer." Once a paycheck is deposited, direct deposit included, it is no longer wages in the employer's hands; it is money in a bank account, and a judgment creditor can attach it. Pennsylvania's cushion at that point is thin:
- A $300 general exemption under 42 Pa.C.S. Section 8123, applicable to any property including bank funds. It does not apply to support judgments.
- Category exemptions under Section 8124, which protect retirement and pension accounts (401(k), 403(b), IRA and Roth IRA funds, with limits on very recent and very large contributions), workers' compensation, unemployment compensation, life insurance proceeds, and certain accident and disability benefits.
- Federally protected benefits. Directly deposited Social Security, VA, and other federal benefits get an automatic shield equal to two months of benefit payments under the federal rule in 31 CFR Part 212, and Social Security is protected from commercial creditors by federal statute beyond that. See Can Social Security be garnished? for how that works and what pierces it.
The practical consequence: a Pennsylvania consumer with a judgment against them is far more exposed at the bank than at the payroll office. Timing deposits, keeping exempt funds unmixed, and claiming exemptions promptly after a levy all matter more here than in states with garnishment formulas.
Job Protection: Stronger Than Federal Law
Section 8127(e) provides that an employer "shall not take any adverse action" against an individual solely because their wages have been attached. Two things make this stronger than the federal rule in 15 U.S.C. 1674: it prohibits any adverse action, not just discharge, and it has no one-debt limit, while federal law stops protecting after garnishment for a single indebtedness. The statute does not spell out a remedy or penalty for violations, so how the rule is enforced is a question for a Pennsylvania employment attorney.
The Statute of Limitations: Four Years Across the Board
Pennsylvania makes the limitations question unusually simple. Under 42 Pa.C.S. Section 5525, a flat four-year period covers express oral contracts, implied contracts, negotiable and nonnegotiable instruments in writing, and other written contracts. The written-versus-oral fight that decides credit card cases in other states is moot here: credit cards, medical bills, personal loans, and store accounts are all four years.

Two wrinkles worth knowing:
- Promissory notes carry a genuine legal tension. Section 5525(a)(7) gives four years for notes and similar written instruments, while Pennsylvania's UCC, 13 Pa.C.S. Section 3118, gives six years for notes payable at a definite time. Which controls a particular negotiable note is a live interpretive question this guide does not resolve; do not assume the shorter period applies to a specific note without legal advice.
- Instruments under seal run twenty years under Section 5529(b), a trap on old formally executed documents.
Pennsylvania has no revival statute. Whether an acknowledgment or partial payment restarts the four-year clock is governed by common-law doctrine, under which courts have required a clear, unequivocal acknowledgment of the debt consistent with an intent to pay. Because the contours are case-law questions, the cautious assumption for a consumer is that acknowledging an old debt in writing, or paying on it, may risk restarting the clock.
Two federal rules complete the picture. A collector who sues or threatens suit on a time-barred debt violates Regulation F, 12 CFR 1006.26, regardless of what they knew. And the credit-reporting window is a separate clock entirely: negative items generally fall off after seven years whether or not the debt is time-barred, and paying an old debt does not erase its history. Time-barred is not the same as erased; collectors may still ask for payment, they just cannot sue. Our statute of limitations on debt guide covers the state-by-state table.
Car Repossession in Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania enacted the standard UCC self-help rule, 13 Pa.C.S. Section 9609: after default a secured lender may repossess without going to court, but only without a breach of the peace. What counts as a breach of the peace is defined by case law, not statute.
The consumer overlay is the Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Act, 12 Pa.C.S. Section 6254. When a vehicle is repossessed without legal process, the holder must immediately furnish a written notice of repossession, delivered personally or by registered or certified mail, stating: the buyer's right to reinstate the contract if the holder extends that privilege (reinstatement is not automatic in Pennsylvania), an itemized total to redeem the vehicle, the holder's intent to resell after 15 days from mailing, where the vehicle is stored, whom to contact about payment, and that personal property found in the vehicle is held for 30 days. After a commercially reasonable sale, the borrower can owe the deficiency balance under the standard UCC accounting. See car repossession laws for the national framework, including the federal court-order requirement for servicemembers' pre-service loans.
If You Are Being Sued or Collected Against in Pennsylvania
The sequence favors people who show up. Answer the complaint, even if you believe the debt is valid, because an answer forces the plaintiff to prove ownership of the debt and the amount, and it preserves the four-year limitations defense, which is waived if never raised. If a judgment already exists, remember what it can and cannot reach: not your paycheck, but potentially your bank account beyond $300, and your non-exempt property. Move quickly after any bank levy to claim the Section 8123 and 8124 exemptions and to identify federally protected funds. If judgments and collection pressure are compounding, bankruptcy stops collection through the automatic stay and is the standard tool for a genuinely unpayable debt load; see Pennsylvania bankruptcy law for how Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 work here. What follows is general information, not a prediction about any individual case.
Overwhelmed by debt? Get a free bankruptcy consultation
Bankruptcy can stop foreclosure, wage garnishment, and creditor calls, and which debts you can clear and what property you keep depend on your state's exemptions. Get a free, confidential consultation with a bankruptcy attorney to understand your options. There is no obligation.
Information last verified on 2026-08-12. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.

Related Resources
- Debt Collection Laws by State
- Statute of Limitations on Debt
- How to Stop Wage Garnishment
- Can Social Security Be Garnished?
- Pennsylvania Statute of Limitations
- Pennsylvania Bankruptcy
- Pennsylvania Child Support Laws
Last updated: 2026-08-12.
More Pennsylvania Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a debt collector garnish wages in Pennsylvania?
Not for ordinary consumer debt. 42 Pa.C.S. Section 8127 exempts wages in the employer's hands from attachment except for divorce obligations, support, board for four weeks or less, capped residential landlord judgments, PHEAA student loans, and criminal restitution, fines, costs, or bail.
Can the state take my paycheck for back taxes in Pennsylvania?
Yes. Taxes are not a Section 8127 exception, but the Department of Revenue garnishes up to 10 percent of gross wages for delinquent state taxes under Act 46 of 2003, without a court order, after a 30-day notice of intent.
Is my bank account protected the way my paycheck is?
No. Section 8127 protects wages only while the employer holds them. Once deposited, funds are attachable, subject to a $300 general exemption, category exemptions for retirement and insurance funds, and the federal two-month shield for directly deposited federal benefits.
What is the statute of limitations on credit card debt in Pennsylvania?
Four years under 42 Pa.C.S. Section 5525, which applies the same period to written contracts, oral contracts, and open accounts alike. Suing or threatening to sue on time-barred debt violates federal Regulation F.
Can I be fired because my wages were attached in Pennsylvania?
Section 8127(e) bars an employer from taking any adverse action against you solely because your wages were attached, with no limit to a single debt. That is broader than the federal rule, which protects only against discharge and only for one indebtedness.
Do I get my car back automatically after a Pennsylvania repossession?
No. The Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Act requires an immediate written notice after repossession, but reinstatement of the contract exists only if the lender extends that privilege. You always have the right to redeem by paying the itemized amount in the notice before resale, which cannot occur until 15 days after the notice is mailed.
Updates
Clarified that the Section 8127(f) protection for abuse victims applies only to wage attachment for physical damages under a residential lease and does not block support, student loan, or criminal restitution attachment.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure)
§ 8127Personal earnings exempt from processIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) General rule and exceptions.--The wages, salaries and commissions of individuals shall while in the hands of the employer be exempt from any attachment, execution or other process except upon an action or proceeding: (1) Under 23 Pa.C.S. Pt. IV (relating to divorce). (2) For support. (3) For board for four weeks or less. (3.1) For amounts awarded to a judgment creditor-landlord arising out of a residential lease upon which the court has rendered judgment which is final. However, the amount subject to attachment shall have deducted from it any security deposit held by the judgment creditor-landlord and forfeited by the judgment debtor-tenant under section 511.1 of the act of April 6, 1951 (P.L.69, No.20), known as The Landlord and Tenant Act of 1951, unless the security deposit has been applied to payment of rent due on the same premises for which the judgment for attachment has been entered. The judgment creditor-landlord shall have the burden of proving that such security deposit has been applied to payment of rent due on the premises herein described.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
Cited in 43 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Danysh v. Department of Corrections (2004) read the 42 Pa.C.S. 8127(a)(5) exception broadly, covering all funds in an employer's custody, even personal gifts, and found no right to added hearings. Boofer v. Lotz (2002) barred a clerk's 20 percent inmate deduction, but Harding v. Stickman (2003) confined it to that posture.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Danysh v. Department of Corrections (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania 2004, 845 A.2d 260)✓An inmate objected to the prison deducting 20% of his account, including personal gifts, toward restitution; the court held Section 8127's earnings exemption did not bar the deductions because subsection (a)(5) excepts court-ordered criminal restitution, costs and fines.
- Harding v. Stickman (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania 2003, 823 A.2d 1110)“…earing. See Boofer; section 8127(a) of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8127(a); and section 9728(b) of the Sentenci…”
- Sweeney v. Lotz (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania 2001, 787 A.2d 449)✓An inmate contesting prison-account deductions for restitution invoked Section 8127(a)(3.1)'s 10% cap for landlord judgments; the court rejected that reliance as addressing a landlord-tenant dispute, noted subsection (a)(5) excepts criminal restitution and fines, and affirmed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Debt Collection Laws by State: Garnishment, SOL, and Repossession Rules
§ 8123General monetary exemptionIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) General rule.--In addition to any other property specifically exempted by this subchapter, property of the judgment debtor (including bank notes, money, securities, real property, judgments or other indebtedness due the judgment debtor) to the value of $300 shall be exempt from attachment or execution on a judgment. Within such time as may be prescribed by general rules the judgment debtor may claim the exemption in kind and may designate the specific items of property to which the exemption provided by this section shall be applicable unless the designated property is not capable of appropriate division, or the judgment debtor may claim the exemption in cash out of the proceeds of the sale. (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to any judgment: (1) For support. (2) Debtor who is not an individual. (3) Obtained for board for four weeks or less. (4) For $100 or less obtained for wages for manual labor. (5) Obtained in foreclosing a mortgage secured upon real property whether the judgment is by an action in mortgage foreclosure or an action on a note, bond or other evidence of indebtedness accompanying a mortgage.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-06 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
Cited in 22 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Sweeney v. Lotz (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania 2001, 787 A.2d 449)“…Section *451 8123(a) of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8123(a). By opinion and order dated February…”
- Russell v. Donnelly (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania 2003, 827 A.2d 535)“…tion 8123(a) of the Judicial Code, as amended, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8123(a). In rejecting the claim, the Court s…”
- Harvey v. Department of Corrections (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania 2003, 823 A.2d 1106)“…The inmate pointed to Section 8123(a) of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8123(a), which provides judgment debtors the…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Bankruptcy in Pennsylvania (2026): Exemptions & Means Test
§ 8124Exemption of particular propertyIn force
(a) Goods.--The following personal property of the judgment debtor shall be exempt from attachment or execution on a judgment: (1) Wearing apparel. (2) Bibles and school books. (3) Sewing machines belonging to seamstresses or used and owned by private families, but not including sewing machines kept for sale or hire. (4) Uniforms and accoutrements as provided by 51 Pa.C.S. § 4103 (relating to exemption of uniforms and equipment). (b) Retirement funds and accounts.-- (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the following money or other property of the judgment debtor shall be exempt from attachment or execution on a judgment: (i) Certain amounts payable under the Public School Employees' Retirement Code as provided by 24 Pa.C.S. § 8533 (relating to taxation, attachment and assignment of funds). (ii) Certain amounts payable under the State Employees' Retirement Code as provided by 71 Pa.C.S. § 5953 (relating to taxation, attachment and assignment of funds). (iii) The retirement allowance provided for in the act of May 24, 1893 (P.L.129, No.82). (iv) Compensation or pension provided for in the act of May 20, 1915 (P.L.566, No.242).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
Cited in 49 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hollman v. Hollman (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 1985, 347 Pa. Super. 289)“…se before us in only one particular. Schmitz involved 42 Pa.C.S. § 8124(c) the insurance exemption and not,…”
- Jones, B. v. McGreevy, D. (Superior Court of Pennsylvania 2022, 270 A.3d 1)“…26 - J-A20022-21 J-A20023-21 to 42 Pa.C.S. § 8124(b)(1)(ix). Garnishees’ Appellees’…”
- B.C. Rodeheaver v. Bedford Pa. CCP (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania 2021)“…on judgments pursuant to Section 8124 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa. C.S. § 8124. (Id. ¶¶ 4-5.) Thus, according to Rodeh…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 5525Four year limitationIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) General rule.--Except as provided for in subsection (b), the following actions and proceedings must be commenced within four years: (1) An action upon a contract, under seal or otherwise, for the sale, construction or furnishing of tangible personal property or fixtures. (2) Any action subject to 13 Pa.C.S. § 2725 (relating to statute of limitations in contracts for sale). (3) An action upon an express contract not founded upon an instrument in writing. (4) An action upon a contract implied in law, except an action subject to another limitation specified in this subchapter. (5) An action upon a judgment or decree of any court of the United States or of any state. (6) An action upon any official bond of a public official, officer or employee. (7) An action upon a negotiable or nonnegotiable bond, note or other similar instrument in writing. Where such an instrument is payable upon demand, the time within which an action on it must be commenced shall be computed from the later of either demand or any payment of principal of or interest on the instrument.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
Cited in 369 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Crouse v. Cyclops Industries (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2000, 560 Pa. 394)“…governed by the four-year limitations period articulated in 42 Pa.C.S. § 5525 because, while this section enumerates…”
- Bailey v. Tucker (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 1993, 533 Pa. 237)“…f his claim. Superior Court applied the four year period of 42 Pa.C.S. § 5525(3), (4) (oral contract or contract impl…”
- Sevast v. Kakouras (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania 2007, 591 Pa. 44)“…r statute of limitations for this equitable action found at 42 Pa. C.S. § 5525. Id. Appellants timely filed a peti…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Pennsylvania Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes Title 12 (Commerce and Trade)
§ 6254Notice of repossessionIn force
(a) General rule.--If repossession of a motor vehicle subject to an installment sale contract is effected other than by legal process, the holder shall immediately furnish the buyer with a written notice of repossession. (b) Delivery.--The notice of repossession shall be delivered in person or sent by registered or certified mail to the last known address of the buyer. (c) Contents.--The notice of repossession shall contain the following: (1) The buyer's right to reinstate the contract, if the holder extends the privilege of reinstatement and redemption of the motor vehicle. (2) An itemized statement of the total amount required to redeem the motor vehicle by reinstatement or payment of the contract in full. (3) Notice to the buyer of the holder's intent to resell the motor vehicle at the expiration of 15 days from the date of mailing the notice. (4) The place where the motor vehicle is stored. (5) The name and address of the person to whom the buyer shall make payment or on whom the buyer may serve notice. (6) A statement that any personal property left in the repossessed vehicle will be held for 30 days from the date of the mailing of the notice.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at palegis.us
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- D'Happart, S. v. First Commonwealth Bank (Superior Court of Pennsylvania 2022, 282 A.3d 704)“…section 6230 (relating to statement of account to buyer). 12 Pa.C.S. § 6254. Appellants initially contend tha…”
- NGUYEN v. POLICE AND FIRE FEDERAL CREDIT (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2024)“…who may repossess an automobile pursuant to § 6251; and (3) 12 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6254, which describes the notice that must b…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 12
§ 1006.26Collection of time-barred debts.In forcecited in 37 of our articles
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section: (1) Statute of limitations means the period prescribed by applicable law for bringing a legal action against the consumer to collect a debt. (2) Time-barred debt means a debt for which the applicable statute of limitations has expired. (b) Legal actions and threats of legal actions prohibited. A debt collector must not bring or threaten to bring a legal action against a consumer to collect a time-barred debt. This paragraph (b) does not apply to proofs of claim filed in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-02 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ecfr.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (2024) dismissed FDCPA claims built on 12 CFR 1006.26(b), reasoning it bars only collection of time-barred debts and the loans at issue were not time barred. Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (2025) dismissed a Regulation F claim because nonjudicial foreclosure is not covered by the FDCPA.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hanover v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2024)✓A borrower claimed a servicer's letter and billing statement lacked language required by 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court granted the servicer summary judgment, since the rule only bars collecting time-barred debts and it had already found her HELOC and mortgage enforceable.
- Raja v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2025)✓Pro se homeowners alleged a servicer and foreclosure attorneys pursued a time-barred, discharged second mortgage in violation of 12 CFR 1006.26(b); the court dismissed that claim, holding parties carrying out a nonjudicial foreclosure are not FDCPA debt collectors.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Idaho Debt Collection Laws: Garnishment Limits, Debt Deadlines, and Repossession, Maine Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Michigan Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
United States Code Title 15
§ 1674Restriction on discharge from employment by reason of garnishmentIn forcecited in 15 of our articles
No employer may discharge any employee by reason of the fact that his earnings have been subjected to garnishment for any one indebtedness. Whoever willfully violates subsection (a) of this section shall be fined not more than $1,000, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 48 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2022
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Federal appeals courts have held that 15 U.S.C. 1674 gives no private right of action to an employee fired over a garnishment. Smith v. Cotton Brothers Baking Co., Inc. (1980) found no implied civil remedy, and Le Vick v. Skaggs Companies, Inc. (1983) agreed, leaving enforcement to the Secretary of Labor under Section 1676.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- James E. Le Vick v. Skaggs Companies, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 1983, 701 F.2d 777)✓An employee fired after his wages were garnished sued his employer under 15 U.S.C. 1674(a); the Ninth Circuit declined to follow its own Stewart precedent and held Congress created no private right of action, leaving enforcement to the Secretary of Labor.
- Hodgson v. Cleveland Municipal Court (District Court, N.D. Ohio 1971, 326 F. Supp. 419)✓The Secretary of Labor argued federal garnishment law preempted Ohio's narrower anti-discharge provision; the court found no showing that 15 U.S.C. 1674, a self-enforcing criminal section, was frustrated by the Ohio statute, and no justiciable controversy under it.
- Reginald O. Wallace v. Debron Corporation (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 1974, 494 F.2d 674)✓A Black welder was fired under a rule barring two garnishments in a year; reversing summary judgment on his Title VII disparate-impact claim, the Eighth Circuit read 15 U.S.C. 1674 as preventing discharge for one indebtedness, not authorizing it for others.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession, Georgia Debt Collection Laws: Garnishment Caps, the 10-Day Repo Notice, and Debt Time Limits, Alabama Debt Collection Laws: Wage Garnishment, Statute of Limitations, and Repossession
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- 42 Pa.C.S. Section 8127, Personal Earnings Exempt from Process(legis.state.pa.us).gov
- 42 Pa.C.S. Section 8123, General Monetary Exemption(legis.state.pa.us).gov
- 42 Pa.C.S. Section 8124, Exemption of Particular Property(legis.state.pa.us).gov
- 42 Pa.C.S. Section 5525, Four Year Limitation(legis.state.pa.us).gov
- 12 Pa.C.S. Section 6254, Notice of Repossession (Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Act)(legis.state.pa.us).gov
- Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, Wage Garnishment (Act 46 of 2003)(pa.gov).gov
- U.S. Department of Labor, Fact Sheet #30: The Federal Wage Garnishment Law (CCPA)(dol.gov).gov