Michigan
Michigan Court Records: How to Search, What's Public, and How to Seal Them
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 10, 2026). · 3 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Michigan runs a single free, statewide trial-court search called MiCOURT, and it comes with an unusual quirk worth knowing about before you search: some courts hide older criminal convictions from the public tool entirely, using what the system calls a 7-Year Criminal Sentence Filter. If a search comes back clean, that is not automatically proof someone has no record.
This page covers how MiCOURT works, what that filter actually does, what stays confidential under Michigan court rules, and how Michigan's automatic Clean Slate expungement law works, including the exact figures the Michigan Attorney General's office publishes.
Information last verified on 2026-08-10. This article has not yet been reviewed by a licensed lawyer.
How to Search Michigan Court Records: MiCOURT
MiCOURT Case Search is Michigan's statewide trial-court public access tool, free to use at micourt.courts.michigan.gov/case-search. It's built as a JavaScript application, so it will not render for automated tools that don't execute scripts, but it works normally in a standard web browser.
The tool carries a direct disclaimer: it "does not replace the official record on file with the court." Its terms of service also prohibit bulk data downloads and scraping, and specifically bar using a VPN to access the system, citing Michigan's computer-crime statute, MCL 752.791 et seq. Under Michigan Court Rule 8.119, the records a court makes available through its public website or web-based portal are generally limited to the case number, party names, and the case history or register of actions, which is why MiCOURT functions more like a docket index than a document repository.
The 7-Year Criminal Sentence Filter (a Michigan-Specific Quirk)
This is worth its own section because it changes how you should read a MiCOURT result. Some Michigan courts apply what the system calls a 7-Year Criminal Sentence Filter. In the tool's own words: "Some courts only display case numbers and information for criminal convictions if the sentencing occurred within seven years of the date of search in MiCOURT. These courts are identified with a check mark under the '7-Year Criminal Sentence Filter' column of the MiCOURT case search."

In practical terms, this means a criminal conviction from more than seven years ago may simply not appear in MiCOURT at all, even though the underlying case remains a public record. This filter applies at the individual court level, not statewide, so whether it affects a particular search depends on which court handled the case. If you need to confirm whether someone has an older conviction, or you're trying to find your own older record, contacting the specific court directly is the only reliable way to close that gap; a blank MiCOURT result does not mean the conviction doesn't exist.
What's Public and What's Restricted in Michigan
Michigan's baseline rule, drawn from Michigan Court Rule 8.119, is that court records are public unless a specific statute, court rule, or order restricts them. That presumption comes from the court rules and from common-law and constitutional access principles rather than from any records-access statute.
Michigan's open-courts statute, MCL 600.1420, addresses proceedings rather than files, providing that "the sittings of every court within this state shall be public" subject to narrow exceptions. Michigan's Freedom of Information Act does not reach the courts at all: MCL 15.232 provides that "the judiciary, including the office of the county clerk and its employees when acting in the capacity of clerk to the circuit court, is not included in the definition of public body." A FOIA request is therefore the wrong tool for a Michigan court file, and the clerk of the trial court is the right one. According to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, a party seeking to seal a record has to file a motion identifying the specific protected interest, obtain written findings from the court explaining the grounds for sealing, and show that no less restrictive alternative exists; the court has to weigh both the parties' interests and the public's interest before granting the request.
Categories that are statutorily sealed or restricted include certain criminal protective orders and victim details in sexual-assault cases, juvenile diversion records and closed-proceeding testimony, adoption records identifying biological or adoptive parents, and grand jury testimony and proceedings, which remain confidential in full. Michigan's court system also maintains a chart of nonpublic and limited-access record categories under MCR 8.119(E), though its full contents were not independently reviewed for this page; if a specific category matters to your situation, checking that chart directly with the court is worthwhile. For the general, nationwide framework behind this presumption of access, see are court records public?
Michigan Clean Slate: What "Expungement" Actually Means Here
Michigan's own Attorney General's office is direct about the terminology: "Clean Slate," "set aside," and "expungement" all mean the same thing in Michigan. What they do not mean is destruction. Expungement in Michigan "removes a conviction from public view," while law enforcement and licensing agencies retain access to it, which functionally makes Michigan's expungement closer to a sealing remedy than an erasure, even though the state uses the word expungement.
Michigan runs a genuinely automatic process for eligible convictions. Michigan State Police run a daily, automatic review, and, in the Attorney General's own words, "you do not need to apply or go to court." The specific figures: misdemeanors punishable by less than 93 days become eligible after 7 years, with no cap on the number of convictions covered. Misdemeanors punishable by 93 days or more become eligible after 7 years, up to 4 convictions. Felonies become eligible after 10 years "from sentencing or release (whichever is later)," up to 2 convictions.
For convictions the automatic process does not reach, a petition-based path exists using form MC227 (or MC227a specifically for marijuana-related convictions), which requires a $50 fee paid to Michigan State Police plus a fingerprint card, filed in the court that handled the conviction. The Attorney General's response after Michigan State Police issues its report can take up to three months. Michigan also runs a self-check tool called ICHAT, though it's worth noting ICHAT does not show juvenile cases.
This page covers the mechanism at a general level. For a full eligibility walkthrough, see our Michigan expungement guide.
Certified Copies and Practical Search Tips
MiCOURT itself states it does not replace the official court record, so for a certified copy, contact the clerk of the trial court where the case was filed.

Because of the 7-Year Criminal Sentence Filter, don't treat an empty or partial MiCOURT result as a complete history. If timing matters, particularly for older convictions, calling the specific court is the only way to be sure you're seeing the full picture. Our how to look up court records guide covers general name-versus-case-number search strategy that applies here too.
Using Court Records Responsibly: The FCRA Rule
Checking your own case, or a case you have a genuine personal reason to look into, is a normal use of MiCOURT. Using it, or a commercial people-search product pulling from the same underlying data, to screen a tenant or job applicant is a separate legal question governed by the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), not by Michigan's court-access rules.
Under 15 U.S.C. § 1681c, most negative consumer-report information ages off after seven years, but § 1681c(a)(5) exempts criminal convictions from that window, meaning a conviction can be reported indefinitely unless Michigan's set-aside process actually removes it from public view. In 2023, the FTC fined TruthFinder and Instant Checkmate $5.8 million for marketing public-records-based background reports for tenant and employment screening without complying with the FCRA, on the theory that a company marketing reports for that purpose is a consumer reporting agency under the law. Treat MiCOURT as personal-use research, and run any real tenant or employment screening through a properly FCRA-compliant background check.
Related Michigan Records Searches
This page is part of our broader Court Records by State guide. If you're checking your own history before a job or a lease, see Michigan background check laws. If you think you might have an active warrant rather than an ordinary case, see Michigan warrant search. For records held by state agencies rather than the courts, see Michigan public records laws.
Disclaimer
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Court portals, fees, and coverage change without notice, and the Michigan Judiciary is the only authoritative source for its own records. If you need a certified copy or have a legal question about a specific case, contact the clerk of court where the case was filed, or consult a licensed Michigan attorney.

Last updated: 2026-08-10. Portal facts and fees reflect their published status as of August 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MiCOURT free to use?
Yes. MiCOURT Case Search is free and covers Michigan trial courts statewide, though it runs as a JavaScript application so it needs a standard web browser to work.
What is the 7-Year Criminal Sentence Filter?
Some Michigan courts hide criminal conviction case numbers and information in MiCOURT if the sentencing happened more than seven years before the search. These courts are flagged with a checkmark in the tool. To see an older conviction, contact the specific court directly.
Does Michigan expungement destroy my record?
No. According to the Michigan Attorney General's own guidance, expungement removes a conviction from public view, but law enforcement and licensing agencies retain access. Michigan's Clean Slate, set aside, and expungement all describe the same remedy.
Is Michigan Clean Slate automatic?
Yes, for eligible convictions. Michigan State Police run a daily automatic review with no application or court filing required. Misdemeanors punishable by less than 93 days clear after 7 years with no cap, misdemeanors of 93 days or more clear after 7 years up to 4 convictions, and felonies clear after 10 years up to 2 convictions.
What if my conviction does not qualify for automatic Clean Slate?
A petition-based path exists using form MC227 (or MC227a for marijuana convictions), a $50 Michigan State Police fee plus fingerprinting, filed in the convicting court, with the Attorney General's response taking up to three months after the police report.
Does MiCOURT show document images or just docket information?
Generally just docket information. Under Michigan Court Rule 8.119, records accessible through a court's public website are typically limited to the case number, party names, and the case history or register of actions.
How do I get a certified copy of a Michigan court record?
Contact the clerk of the trial court where the case was filed. MiCOURT itself states it does not replace the official record on file with the court.
Updates
Clarified that Michigan's presumption of public court records rests on Michigan Court Rule 8.119 and common-law access rather than the state's open-courts statute, which governs proceedings, and noted that Michigan's FOIA does not apply to the judiciary.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Michigan Compiled Laws
§ 780.621gSetting aside certain convictions without application; requirements; exceptions; implementation date; reinstatement; "crime of dishonesty" definedIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
(1) Beginning 2 years after the effective date of the amendatory act that added this section and subject to any necessary appropriation, a misdemeanor conviction for an offense for which the maximum punishment is imprisonment for not more than 92 days is set aside under this section without the filing of an application under section 1 if 7 years have passed from the imposition of the sentence. Each court shall notify the arresting law enforcement agency of each conviction on or before the tenth day of each month that is set aside under this subsection for the preceding month. Each law enforcement agency need not retain and shall make nonpublic the notification that the conviction has been set aside, and the record of the arrest, fingerprinting, conviction, and sentence of the person in the case to which the notification applies.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People of Michigan v. Christopher Shane Babcock (Michigan Court of Appeals 2025)“…ments. At a subsequent hearing, the prosecution argued that MCL 780.621g(12) and MCL 780.621h(3) provided that a…”
- People of Michigan v. Jeffrey Duane Tull (Michigan Court of Appeals 2024)“…ony conviction has since been automatically set aside under MCL 780.621g(2), this issue is now moot. Accordingly…”
- People of Michigan v. Monica Rannay Pulliam (Michigan Court of Appeals 2024)“…See MCL 780.621a(b); MCL 760.621c(d)(i) through (iii). 4 MCL 780.621g, effective April 11, 2021, governs the…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Michigan Expungement Laws: How Conviction Set-Aside Works Under MCL 780.621, Expungement Laws by State: How to Clear Your Record (2026), How to Check if Your Record Has Been Expunged
§ 752.791Meanings of words and phrasesIn force
For the purposes of this act, the words and phrases defined in sections 2 and 3 have the meanings ascribed to them in those sections.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2016
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Earlene Lewis v. Wayne County Prosecutor's Office (Michigan Court of Appeals 2016)“…L 600.4701 et seq., the Fraudulent Access to Computers Act, MCL 752.791 et seq., or the Identity Theft Forfeitu…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 15
§ 1681cRequirements relating to information contained in consumer reportsIn forcecited in 54 of our articles
Except as authorized under subsection (b), no consumer reporting agency may make any consumer report containing any of the following items of information: Cases under title 11 or under the Bankruptcy Act that, from the date of entry of the order for relief or the date of adjudication, as the case may be, antedate the report by more than 10 years. Civil suits, civil judgments, and records of arrest that, from date of entry, antedate the report by more than seven years or until the governing statute of limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period. Paid tax liens which, from date of payment, antedate the report by more than seven years. Accounts placed for collection or charged to profit and loss which antedate the report by more than seven years. Any other adverse item of information, other than records of convictions of crimes which antedates the report by more than seven years.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 383 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Katz v. Donna Karan Co. (2017) addressed the FACTA truncation rule in 1681c(g) and affirmed dismissal for lack of Article III standing, treating material risk of harm as a fact question. Edward Seamans v. Temple University (2014) held the seven-year window in 1681c(a)(4) is extended for an education loan only until that loan is repaid.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Katz v. Donna Karan Co. (Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 2017, 872 F.3d 114)✓A shopper sued two stores whose receipts printed the first six digits of his credit card number; the Second Circuit affirmed dismissal for lack of standing, seeing no clear error in the finding that those digits show only the card issuer, not a material risk of identity theft.
- Edward Seamans v. Temple University (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2014, 744 F.3d 853)✓A defaulted university loan kept appearing on a borrower's credit reports after he repaid it because the school never reported the delinquency date; the Third Circuit held the Higher Education Act suspends section 1681c(a)(4)'s aging-off rule only until repayment.
- Gonzales v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2011, 660 F.3d 1055)✓A debt buyer offered to settle health club debts over seven years old, saying that if it was reporting the account the bureaus would be told it was settled; the Ninth Circuit, treating those debts as unreportable under section 1681c(a)(4), called that implication misleading.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How Long Does a Felony Stay on Your Record? (2026), Alabama Background Check Laws (2026 Guide), Louisiana Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- MiCOURT Case Search, Michigan Courts(courts.michigan.gov).gov
- Michigan Attorney General, Expungement Assistance (Michigan Clean Slate)(michigan.gov).gov
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Open Courts Compendium: Michigan(rcfp.org)
- Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, 15 U.S.C. Section 1681c(law.cornell.edu)
- FTC, FTC Says TruthFinder and Instant Checkmate Deceived Users About Background Report Accuracy, Violated FCRA(ftc.gov).gov
- Michigan Legislature, MCL 600.1420 (Courts; sittings to be public, exceptions)(legislature.mi.gov)
- Michigan Legislature, MCL 15.232 (Freedom of Information Act definitions; judiciary excluded from "public body")(legislature.mi.gov)