Michigan
Michigan Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 16, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 9, 2026. · 15 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Michigan regulates background checks through a combination of state statutes and federal law. The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681) governs third-party screening, while the Clean Slate Act allows automatic expungement of eligible records. Michigan imposes no statewide lookback limit on criminal convictions, and private employers face no ban-the-box requirement.
Last verified: March 2026. This page reflects current Michigan Compiled Laws (MCL) including the Clean Slate Act (MCL 780.621 et seq.), the Bullard-Plawecki Employee Right to Know Act (MCL 423.501), and relevant federal law under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681).
Table of Contents
- Overview of Michigan Background Check Laws
- Types of Background Checks in Michigan
- Michigan Clean Slate Act and Expungement
- Employer Background Checks and Ban the Box
- FCRA Requirements in Michigan
- Housing and Tenant Screening
- Professional Licensing Background Checks
- Lookback Periods and Reporting Limits
- Michigan Sex Offender Registry
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Sources and References
Overview of Michigan Background Check Laws
Michigan background check laws are governed by a combination of state statutes, executive directives, local ordinances, and federal regulations. The state does not impose a blanket seven-year lookback limit on criminal history reporting, which means that criminal convictions can generally appear on a background check indefinitely unless they have been expunged or set aside under the Clean Slate Act.

The primary tool for conducting criminal background checks in Michigan is the Internet Criminal History Access Tool (ICHAT), operated by the Michigan State Police Criminal Justice Information Center. ICHAT provides name-based searches of public criminal history records and is the only public resource of its kind in the state.
Michigan law addresses background checks across several contexts, including employment, housing, professional licensing, and volunteer screening. Each area has its own rules about when checks can be conducted, what information can be considered, and how the results may influence decisions.
Key statutes governing background checks in Michigan include:
- MCL 780.621 et seq. (Clean Slate Act, expungement and set-aside of convictions)
- MCL 423.501 et seq. (Bullard-Plawecki Employee Right to Know Act)
- MCL 28.721 et seq. (Sex Offenders Registration Act)
- MCL 37.2101 et seq. (Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act), including MCL 37.2205a on misdemeanor arrest records
- MCL 123.1384 (Local Government Labor Regulatory Limitation Act, preempting local hiring-inquiry ordinances)
- 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq. (Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act)
Types of Background Checks in Michigan
Michigan offers several methods for conducting background checks, each with different scopes and costs.
ICHAT (Internet Criminal History Access Tool)
ICHAT is the most commonly used tool for criminal background checks in Michigan. Operated by the Michigan State Police, it provides name-based searches of public criminal history records. Key details include:
- Cost: $10.00 per search
- Records included: All felonies and serious misdemeanors punishable by more than 93 days, reported by law enforcement, prosecutors, and courts across all 83 Michigan counties
- Records excluded: Federal records, tribal records, traffic offenses, juvenile records, local misdemeanors (93 days or less), criminal history from other states, suppressed records, and warrant information
- Availability: Results are available immediately online and remain accessible for seven days before automatic deletion
Fingerprint-Based Background Checks
For a more thorough check, fingerprint-based searches are available through the Michigan State Police at a cost of $42.00. These checks are typically required for certain professional licenses and government positions. Fingerprint checks can access both state and federal (FBI) databases, providing a more comprehensive result than name-based searches.
FBI Background Checks
Federal background checks through the FBI are required for certain regulated industries and positions. These checks search the national criminal database and are processed through authorized channeling agencies. They typically cost between $18 and $50 depending on the processing agency.
Michigan Clean Slate Act and Expungement
Michigan's Clean Slate Act, signed into law in October 2020 and expanded through subsequent legislation, represents one of the most comprehensive criminal record relief programs in the United States. The law significantly affects what appears on background checks by providing both automatic and petition-based expungement pathways.

Automatic Expungement
The automatic expungement program, which launched on April 11, 2023, runs daily to identify newly eligible convictions. The Michigan State Police system automatically processes qualifying records and notifies the courts. On its first day of operation, over one million residents were expected to receive automatic expungements.
Automatic expungement timelines:
- Eligible misdemeanors: Automatically set aside after 7 years from sentencing
- Eligible felonies: Automatically set aside after 10 years from sentencing or completion of any term of imprisonment, whichever is later
- Limits: No more than 2 felony convictions and 4 misdemeanor convictions (punishable by 93+ days) can be automatically set aside
Petition-Based Expungement
Individuals can also petition the convicting court to set aside convictions under MCL 780.621. The expanded eligibility allows:
- Up to 3 felony convictions and an unlimited number of misdemeanors to be expunged through petition
- No more than 2 assaultive crime convictions can be set aside in a person's lifetime
- No more than 1 felony conviction for the same offense punishable by more than 10 years can be set aside
Waiting periods for petition-based expungement:
- Misdemeanors (non-serious): 3 years from the latest of sentencing, completion of probation, or release from imprisonment
- Serious misdemeanors or single felonies: 5 years from the latest of sentencing, completion of probation, discharge from parole, or release from imprisonment
Convictions That Cannot Be Expunged
Certain offenses are permanently excluded from both automatic and petition-based expungement:
- Felonies punishable by life imprisonment or attempts thereof
- Assaultive crimes (limited to 2 total set-asides)
- Serious misdemeanors (for automatic expungement only)
- Crimes involving minors, vulnerable adults, injury, serious impairment, or death
- Human trafficking offenses
- Crimes of dishonesty (for automatic expungement only)
- Offenses punishable by 10 or more years (for automatic expungement only)
Effect on Background Checks
Once a conviction is expunged, it is removed from public records including ICHAT. Expunged records generally cannot be disclosed to employers, landlords, or licensing agencies. The Michigan Attorney General's office provides resources and holds regular expungement fairs to help residents navigate the process.
Employer Background Checks and Ban the Box
Michigan's approach to employer background checks involves a patchwork of state directives, local ordinances, and a notable preemption law that limits municipal authority.
State Government: Executive Directive 2018-4
In September 2018, Governor Rick Snyder signed Executive Directive 2018-4, which functions as a ban-the-box policy for Michigan state government employment. The directive:
- Removed the felony conviction question from state job applications on NEOGOV
- Replaced the criminal history checkbox with an affirmation of good character statement
- Prohibits state departments from using criminal history as an initial screen for applicants
- Delays criminal history inquiries until after an initial interview or conditional offer of employment
This directive applies only to state government positions. It does not extend to private sector employers.
Private Employers: No Statewide Ban the Box
Michigan does not have a statewide ban-the-box law covering private employers. Private companies in Michigan may legally ask about criminal history on job applications and at any point during the hiring process, subject to federal FCRA requirements.
2018 Preemption Law (2018 PA 84)
Michigan restricts local governments from regulating what information employers can request on job applications or during the interview process. The rule sits in the Local Government Labor Regulatory Limitation Act (2015 PA 105) at MCL 123.1384, which took its current form through 2018 PA 84, effective June 24, 2018.
The statute provides that a local governmental body "shall not adopt, enforce, or administer an ordinance, local policy, or local resolution regulating information an employer or potential employer must request, require, or exclude on an application for employment or during the interview process." Because the ban reaches enforcement and administration and not just adoption, an ordinance already on the books when the amendment took effect is not exempted by its age.
The one carve-out is that the preemption does not apply to an ordinance requiring a criminal background check in connection with a local license or permit.
Detroit: What the Fair Chance Ordinance Actually Covers
Detroit's "Fair Chance Ordinance" is widely described online as a ban-the-box rule binding private employers in the city. It is not. The measure the City of Detroit enforces under that name is Detroit City Code Sec. 26-5-1, Fair Chance Access to Rental Housing, which added Article V to Chapter 26 (Housing) of the 1984 Detroit City Code. It regulates landlords with a portfolio of 4 or more properties, not employers, and it is administered by Detroit's Civil Rights, Inclusion and Opportunity Department. Its requirements are covered under Housing and Tenant Screening below.
Detroit has no fair chance ordinance that binds private employers generally. An ordinance of that kind would run into MCL 123.1384, which bars a local governmental body from adopting, enforcing, or administering a local rule about what an employer may ask on an application or in an interview.
Private employers in Detroit are therefore subject to the same rules as employers elsewhere in Michigan: the federal FCRA, and the Elliott-Larsen restriction on misdemeanor arrest records described next.
Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act
The Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (MCL 37.2101 et seq.) is Michigan's primary civil rights statute. While it does not specifically prohibit discrimination based on criminal history, MCL 37.2202 protects against employment discrimination based on religion, race, color, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, height, weight, and marital status.
The act also carries the one state-level limit on criminal history questions in Michigan hiring. Under MCL 37.2205a, an employer, employment agency, or labor organization, other than a law enforcement agency, may not request, make, or maintain a record of information about a misdemeanor arrest, detention, or disposition that did not result in a conviction. The section does not reach felony charges before conviction or dismissal, and an applicant cannot be found guilty of perjury for withholding information the section entitles them to withhold.
"Source of income" is not an employment protected category in Michigan. The 2024 amendments that added it (2024 PA 200 and 2024 PA 180, both effective April 2, 2025) amended Elliott-Larsen's housing article, so the protection covers rental housing and other real estate transactions rather than hiring. See Housing and Tenant Screening.
FCRA Requirements in Michigan
The Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681) is the primary federal law governing how background checks are conducted and used in employment decisions. Michigan employers must comply with all FCRA requirements when using a third-party consumer reporting agency (CRA) to conduct background checks.
Consent and Disclosure
Before obtaining a background check through a CRA, Michigan employers must:
- Provide a clear and conspicuous written disclosure that a background check may be obtained
- The disclosure must be on a standalone document, separate from the employment application
- Obtain the applicant's written authorization before the check is conducted
- Clearly specify the types of information that will be obtained
- Provide a summary of rights under both federal and applicable state laws
Adverse Action Process
When an employer decides not to hire or to take other negative action based on background check results, the FCRA requires a two-step adverse action process:
Step 1: Pre-Adverse Action Notice. Before making a final decision, the employer must provide the applicant with a copy of the background check report and a summary of their rights under the FCRA. The applicant must be given a reasonable waiting period (typically 5 to 10 business days) to review and dispute any inaccurate information.
Step 2: Final Adverse Action Notice. If the employer proceeds with the adverse decision, they must provide written notice that includes the name and contact information of the reporting agency, a statement that the agency did not make the adverse decision, and notice of the applicant's right to obtain a free copy of the report and to dispute its accuracy.
Seven-Year Reporting Rule
Under the FCRA, certain types of negative information have a seven-year reporting limit for positions with an annual salary below $75,000. This includes arrests that did not result in conviction, civil judgments, tax liens, and accounts placed in collection.
Criminal convictions are not subject to the seven-year limit. Felony and misdemeanor convictions can be reported indefinitely under both federal and Michigan law, unless the record has been expunged under the Clean Slate Act.
Record Retention
Michigan employers must maintain records related to background checks and employment decisions for at least one year after making the employment decision. Other applicable laws may require longer retention periods.
Housing and Tenant Screening
Michigan landlords who conduct background checks on prospective tenants must comply with both the federal Fair Housing Act and state-level requirements.

General Requirements
- Written consent is required before running any background check on a tenant
- Landlords must disclose in writing whether the screening process includes evaluating the applicant's criminal record before accepting an application fee
- If criminal records are considered, the landlord must inform the applicant that they may provide documentary evidence of inaccuracies, rehabilitation, or other mitigating factors
Fair Chance Housing (Detroit)
Detroit City Code Sec. 26-5-1, Fair Chance Access to Rental Housing, applies a ban-the-box approach to rental housing. It covers landlords within the City of Detroit holding a portfolio of 4 or more properties. Under the city's notice to landlords, a covered housing provider must:
- Decide credit history, income, and leasing history and issue a conditional lease before asking about arrest or conviction history
- Avoid any statement that people with an arrest or conviction record will not be considered
- Include the city's prescribed fair chance notice in solicitations and advertisements, on its website, and in a hard copy to applicants
- Provide a copy of the background check before denying on conviction history, allow the applicant 14 days to identify inaccuracies or submit evidence of rehabilitation, then wait at least 5 more days and reconsider
- Retain applications and related records for one year
The ordinance still permits denial for defined categories, including applicants ineligible for public housing, lifetime registered sex offenders, violent or drug-related felonies, felonies within the last 10 years or imprisonment within the last 5 years, crimes against landlords or tenants, arson, and metal theft or property damage. Arrests that did not result in conviction, diversion or deferred-judgment outcomes, juvenile records, misdemeanor convictions more than 5 years old, civil infractions, and expunged or pardoned convictions may not be used to deny an otherwise eligible applicant.
Reusable Screening Reports (Not Michigan Law)
Michigan has no reusable tenant screening report statute. House Bill 5605 of 2024 would have amended the Residential Tenants Act to let a tenant submit a reusable screening report and would have barred a landlord who accepted one from charging a separate rental application fee. The bill was introduced on March 20, 2024, referred to the Committee on Economic Development and Small Business, and recorded no further action. It died with the 2023 to 2024 legislative session and was never enacted.
Michigan landlords may therefore still require their own screening and charge their own application fees, subject to the disclosure rules above.
Fair Housing Protections
The federal Fair Housing Act prohibits housing discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, and disability. Blanket policies that deny housing based on any criminal record may have a disparate impact on protected groups and could violate fair housing laws. HUD guidance recommends that landlords conduct individualized assessments considering the nature, severity, and recency of the offense.
Professional Licensing Background Checks
Michigan requires criminal background checks for many professional licenses regulated by the Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA).
Workforce Background Check Program
LARA's Workforce Background Check program authorizes state and federal fingerprint-based criminal history record checks for employees, independent contractors, and individuals granted clinical privileges who have direct access to patients or residents. This program covers healthcare facilities, adult foster care homes, homes for the aged, and child care organizations.
Process for Licensure
Applicants for professional licensure typically must:
- Submit to a fingerprint-based criminal background check
- Use the Customer ID number and instructions provided in their application confirmation letter
- Pay the applicable processing fee
- Allow up to 30 days for the Michigan State Police to provide criminal history results to LARA
Professions Requiring Background Checks
Many licensed professions in Michigan require criminal background checks, including but not limited to:
- Healthcare workers (nurses, physicians, pharmacists, therapists)
- Teachers and school employees (MCL 380.1230a)
- Child care workers and foster care providers
- Security guards and alarm system installers
- Real estate professionals
- Social workers
Disqualifying Offenses
The impact of a criminal record on professional licensure varies by profession and licensing board. Some boards apply automatic disqualification for certain offenses, while others conduct individualized reviews considering the nature of the offense, its relationship to the profession, evidence of rehabilitation, and time elapsed since the conviction.
Lookback Periods and Reporting Limits
Understanding what can appear on a Michigan background check and for how long is essential for both employers and applicants.
Criminal Convictions
Michigan does not impose a state-level lookback limit on criminal conviction reporting. Convictions that have not been expunged may appear on background checks indefinitely. This applies to both felonies and misdemeanors.
Non-Conviction Records
Under the FCRA, arrests that did not result in conviction can only be reported for 7 years for positions paying less than $75,000 annually. For higher-paying positions, there is no time limit on reporting non-conviction records.
Civil Records
Civil judgments, tax liens, and collection accounts are subject to the FCRA's 7-year reporting limit for positions below the $75,000 salary threshold.
Expunged Records
Records that have been set aside under the Clean Slate Act are removed from public databases, including ICHAT. Consumer reporting agencies should not include expunged records in background check reports. If an expunged record appears on a report, the individual has the right to dispute the information with both the CRA and the original data source.
Driving Records
Michigan driving records through the Secretary of State are generally available for the most recent 10 years of activity.
Michigan Sex Offender Registry
The Sex Offenders Registration Act (SORA), codified at MCL 28.721 et seq., requires individuals convicted of certain sexual offenses to register with the Michigan State Police. The public registry is searchable online and provides information including the offender's name, photograph, address, and conviction details.
Key Features of SORA
- Registration is required for various sexual offenses, crimes against children, and related offenses as defined in MCL 28.722
- The registry is publicly accessible and separate from ICHAT
- Employers, landlords, and individuals can search the registry at no cost
- Registration periods range from 15 years to lifetime depending on the offense tier
- Sex offender registry information is not subject to expungement under the Clean Slate Act
Employer and Housing Considerations
Employers and landlords may check the sex offender registry as part of their screening process. Unlike general criminal history inquiries, sex offender registry checks are generally permitted even in jurisdictions with ban-the-box or fair chance ordinances.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Michigan have a ban-the-box law for private employers?
No. Michigan does not have a statewide ban-the-box law that applies to private employers. State government positions are covered by Executive Directive 2018-4, which delays criminal history inquiries until after an initial interview. Detroit's Fair Chance ordinance is often cited as a private employer rule, but it is a rental housing measure (Detroit City Code Sec. 26-5-1) covering landlords with 4 or more properties. A 2018 preemption law, MCL 123.1384 as amended by 2018 PA 84, bars Michigan municipalities from adopting, enforcing, or administering local ban-the-box ordinances for private employers.
How far back does a background check go in Michigan?
Criminal convictions can be reported indefinitely in Michigan. There is no state law imposing a seven-year or other lookback limit on conviction records. However, the federal FCRA limits reporting of non-conviction information (such as arrests without conviction, civil judgments, and collection accounts) to seven years for positions paying less than $75,000 annually. Records expunged under the Clean Slate Act are removed from public databases and should not appear on background checks.
What is the Michigan Clean Slate Act and how does it affect my background check?
The Clean Slate Act (MCL 780.621 et seq.) provides for both automatic and petition-based expungement of criminal records. Eligible misdemeanors are automatically set aside after 7 years, and eligible felonies after 10 years. Once a record is expunged, it is removed from ICHAT and should not appear on background checks. You can check whether your records have been automatically expunged by searching your name on the ICHAT system. The Michigan Attorney General's office also holds regular expungement fairs to help residents navigate the petition process.
Can a Michigan employer deny me a job based solely on my criminal record?
Federal law does not prohibit employers from considering criminal history, but the EEOC has issued guidance recommending that employers conduct individualized assessments rather than applying blanket exclusion policies. The assessment should consider the nature and gravity of the offense, the time that has passed since the offense or completion of the sentence, and the nature of the job being sought. Michigan adds one narrow state limit: under MCL 37.2205a, an employer may not request or keep a record of a misdemeanor arrest that did not result in a conviction. No Michigan statute or Detroit ordinance requires a private employer to hold criminal history questions until after a conditional offer.
How much does a Michigan background check cost?
A name-based ICHAT search through the Michigan State Police costs $10.00 per search, with results available immediately online. Fingerprint-based background checks cost $42.00 and are processed by the Michigan State Police. FBI background checks typically cost between $18 and $50 depending on the channeling agency. Many employers use third-party consumer reporting agencies, which may charge additional fees for comprehensive screening packages that include criminal history, credit reports, employment verification, and other checks.
Related Michigan Laws
Updates
Corrected the Detroit Fair Chance ordinance, which governs rental housing for landlords with four or more properties rather than private employers; fixed the 2018 local preemption law's act number to 2018 PA 84 and removed the incorrect suggestion that older local ordinances are grandfathered; clarified that Michigan's 2024 source-of-income protection applies to housing and not employment; and removed a reusable tenant screening report rule that was never enacted.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Stopped attributing Michigan's automatic (no-application) expungement timelines to MCL 780.621, which is the petition-based section, and restored the 'for the same offense' qualifier on the one-felony-over-10-years cap.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Michigan Compiled Laws
§ 37.2205aEmployer, employment agency, or labor organization; record of information regarding misdemeanor arrest, detention, or disposition; failure to recite or acknowledge information; "law enforcement agency" definedIn force
(1) An employer, employment agency, or labor organization, other than a law enforcement agency of this state or a political subdivision of this state, shall not in connection with an application for employment or membership, or in connection with the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment or membership request, make, or maintain a record of information regarding a misdemeanor arrest, detention, or disposition where a conviction did not result. A person is not guilty of perjury or otherwise for giving a false statement by failing to recite or acknowledge information the person has a civil right to withhold by this section. This section does not apply to information relative to a felony charge before conviction or dismissal. (2) As used in this section, "law enforcement agency" includes the state department of corrections.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
§ 28.721Short titleIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
This act shall be known and may be cited as the "sex offenders registration act".
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
Cited in 215 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Bosca (Michigan Court of Appeals 2015, 310 Mich. App. 1)“…accordance with the sex offenders registration act (SORA), MCL 28.721 et seq. We affirm defendant’s convictio…”
- In Re Ayres (Michigan Court of Appeals 2000, 239 Mich. App. 8)“…as a sex offender under the Sex Offenders Registration Act, MCL 28.721 et seq.] MSA 4.475(1)…”
- People v. Dowdy (Michigan Supreme Court 2011, 489 Mich. 373)“…ld that homelessness is not a bar to compliance with 1 MCL 28.721 et seq. SORA has since been amended, se…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 28.722DefinitionsIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
As used in this act: (a) "Convicted" means 1 of the following: (i) Having a judgment of conviction or a probation order entered in any court having jurisdiction over criminal offenses, including, but not limited to, a tribal court or a military court. Convicted does not include a conviction that was subsequently set aside under 1965 PA 213, MCL 780.621 to 780.624, or otherwise expunged. (ii) Except as otherwise provided in this subparagraph, being assigned to youthful trainee status under sections 11 to 15 of chapter II of the code of criminal procedure, 1927 PA 175, MCL 762.11 to 762.15, before October 1, 2004. An individual who is assigned to and successfully completes a term of supervision under sections 11 to 15 of chapter II of the code of criminal procedure, 1927 PA 175, MCL 762.11 to 762.15, is not convicted for purposes of this act. This subparagraph does not apply if a petition was granted under section 8c at any time allowing the individual to discontinue registration under this act, including a reduced registration period that extends to or past July 1, 2011, regardless of the tier designation that would apply on and after that date.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
Cross-referenced in the statute itself: § 780.621
Cited in 210 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Watkins; People v. Pullen (Michigan Supreme Court 2012, 491 Mich. 450)“…ion 2 of the sex offenders registration act, 1994 PA 295 , MCL 28.722. (b) “Minor” means an individual less…”
- People v. Bosca (Michigan Court of Appeals 2015, 310 Mich. App. 1)“…amended version of SORA,11 a “listed offense” is defined by MCL 28.722(k) as comprising a “tier I, tier II, or…”
- People v. Mann (Michigan Court of Appeals 2010, 288 Mich. App. 114)“…ion 2 of the sex offenders registration act, 1994 PA 295 , MCL 28.722.” MCL 28.722(e)(x) states that a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Michigan Pornography Laws (2026): Two Age-Verification Bills, Neither Enacted
§ 37.2101Short titleIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Elliott-Larsen civil rights act".
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
Cited in 942 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co. (Michigan Supreme Court 1996, 451 Mich. 358)“…ismissed plaintiffs claim pursuant to the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq.-, MSA 3.548(101) et seq., o…”
- Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (Michigan Supreme Court 2004, 470 Mich. 749)“…h of contract, violations of the Michigan Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq., and negligence in addressing…”
- MacK v. City of Detroit (Michigan Supreme Court 2002, 467 Mich. 186)“…tion based on one’s sex arising under the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq., and that the city extended t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Michigan At-Will Employment Laws: Exceptions and Your Rights
§ 380.1230aCriminal records check through federal bureau of investigation; employment as conditional employee; voiding contract and terminating employment; application as substitute teacher or substitute bus drivers; obtaining copy of results from another district, public school academy, or nonpublic school; consent; form and manner of request; use and disclosure of results; violation as misdemeanor; penalty; definition; initiation of criminal records check by department of state police; disclosure that individual convicted of listed offense or other felony; verification; exception; verification information; definitionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) In addition to the criminal history check required under section 1230, the board of a school district or intermediate school district or the governing body of a public school academy or nonpublic school shall request the department of state police to conduct a criminal records check through the federal bureau of investigation on an applicant for, or an individual who is hired for, any full-time or part-time employment or who is assigned to regularly and continuously work under contract in any of its schools. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a board or governing body shall not employ an individual or allow an individual to regularly and continuously work under contract in any of its schools until after the board or governing body receives the results of the criminal records check. A board or governing body requesting a criminal records check under this section shall require the individual to submit his or her fingerprints to the department of state police for that purpose. The department of state police may charge a fee for conducting the criminal records check.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2018
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Council of Organizations & Others for Ed v. State of Michigan (Michigan Court of Appeals 2018, 326 Mich. App. 124)“…ckground checks are mandated by state law. MCL 380.1230 and MCL 380.1230a.12 Conducting criminal background check…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 423.501Short title; definitionsIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Bullard-Plawecki employee right to know act". (2) As used in this act: (a) "Employee" means a person currently employed or formerly employed by an employer. (b) "Employer" means an individual, corporation, partnership, labor organization, unincorporated association, the state, or an agency or a political subdivision of the state, or any other legal, business, or commercial entity which has 4 or more employees and includes an agent of the employer. (c) "Personnel record" means a record kept by the employer that identifies the employee, to the extent that the record is used or has been used, or may affect or be used relative to that employee's qualifications for employment, promotion, transfer, additional compensation, or disciplinary action. A personnel record shall include a record in the possession of a person, corporation, partnership, or other association who has a contractual agreement with the employer to keep or supply a personnel record as provided in this subdivision.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
Cited in 56 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McManamon v. Redford Charter Township (Michigan Court of Appeals 2006, 273 Mich. App. 131)“…his action involving the Employee Right to Know Act (ERKA), MCL 423.501 et seq. In Docket No. 263260, defenda…”
- Newark Morning Ledger Co. v. Saginaw County Sheriff (Michigan Court of Appeals 1994, 204 Mich. App. 215)“…ng to an employee in the Employee Right to Know Act (erka), MCL 423.501 et seq.; MSA-17.62(1)…”
- Michigan Professional Employees Society v. Department of Natural Resources (Michigan Court of Appeals 1992, 192 Mich. App. 483)“…for certain documents under the Employee Right to Know Act, MCL 423.501 et seq.; MSA 17.62(1) et seq. We af…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 780.621Application for order setting aside conviction; felony or misdemeanor conviction; setting aside of certain convictions prohibited; victim of human trafficking violation; definitionsIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this act, a person who is convicted of 1 or more criminal offenses may file an application with the convicting court for the entry of an order setting aside 1 or more convictions as follows: (a) Except as provided in subdivisions (b) and (c), a person convicted of 1 or more criminal offenses, but not more than a total of 3 felony offenses, in this state, may apply to have all of the applicant's convictions from this state set aside. (b) An applicant may not have more than a total of 2 convictions for an assaultive crime set aside under this act during the applicant's lifetime. (c) An applicant may not have more than 1 felony conviction for the same offense set aside under this section if the offense is punishable by more than 10 years imprisonment. (d) A person who is convicted of a violation or an attempted violation of section 520e of the Michigan penal code, 1931 PA 328, MCL 750.520e, before January 12, 2015 may petition the convicting court to set aside the conviction if the individual has not been convicted of another offense other than not more than 2 minor offenses.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-01 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
Cited in 57 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):People v. Droog (2009) held the Vehicle Code bar on expunging reportable violations does not limit a court's authority to set aside a conviction under MCL 780.621. People v. Van Heck (2002) applied 780.621 eligibility to hold that a pardoned out-of-state conviction does not count against the applicant.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Droog (Michigan Court of Appeals 2009, 282 Mich. App. 68)✓A woman convicted of obtaining a controlled substance by fraud was refused a set aside because the Vehicle Code bars expunging violations reportable to the Secretary of State; the court held that bar does not limit MCL 780.621 and remanded for an order setting it aside.
- People v. Link (Michigan Court of Appeals 1997, 225 Mich. App. 211)✓A man convicted in 1989 of third degree criminal sexual conduct applied in 1994 to set that conviction aside; the court held the 1997 amendment excluding such convictions is remedial and applies retroactively, since setting aside a conviction is a privilege and not a right.
- People v. Van Heck (Michigan Court of Appeals 2002, 252 Mich. App. 207)✓A man with five absolutely pardoned Connecticut misdemeanors was told his 1979 Michigan felonious assault conviction could not be set aside because he had more than one offense; the court held the pardon left him innocent as a matter of law, so MCL 780.621(1) still covered him.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Michigan Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties, Michigan Expungement Laws: How Conviction Set-Aside Works Under MCL 780.621, Expungement Laws by State: How to Clear Your Record (2026)
§ 780.621cProhibition on setting aside convictions for certain criminal cases; applicability to MCL 780.621g; inapplicable to secretary of state driving recordIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(1) A person shall not apply to have set aside, and a judge shall not set aside, a conviction for any of the following: (a) A felony for which the maximum punishment is life imprisonment or an attempt to commit a felony for which the maximum punishment is life imprisonment. (b) A violation or attempted violation of section 136b(3), 136d(1)(b) or (c), 145c, 145d, 520c, 520d, or 520g of the Michigan penal code, 1931 PA 328, MCL 750.136b, 750.136d, 750.145c, 750.145d, 750.520c, 750.520d, and 750.520g. (c) A violation or attempted violation of section 520e of the Michigan penal code, 1931 PA 328, MCL 750.520e, if the conviction occurred on or after January 12, 2015. (d) The following traffic offenses: (i) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), a conviction for operating while intoxicated committed by any person. (ii) Any traffic offense committed by an individual with an indorsement on his or her operator's or chauffeur's license to operate a commercial motor vehicle that was committed while the individual was operating the commercial motor vehicle or was in another manner a commercial motor vehicle violation. (iii) Any traffic offense that causes injury or death.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legislature.mi.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People of Michigan v. Monica Rannay Pulliam (Michigan Court of Appeals 2024)“…ent. Notably, manslaughter and AWIGBH are not on that list. MCL 780.621c.3 Defendant has four felonies on her re…”
- People of Michigan v. Jason Scott Knuppenburg (Michigan Court of Appeals 2023)“…In Brady v United States, 397 US 742, 755; 90 1 Under MCL 780.621c(1)(c), as amended by 2014 PA 463, effec…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 15
§ 1681Congressional findings and statement of purposeIn forcecited in 14 of our articles
The Congress makes the following findings: The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly impair the efficiency of the banking system, and unfair credit reporting methods undermine the public confidence which is essential to the continued functioning of the banking system. An elaborate mechanism has been developed for investigating and evaluating the credit worthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, and general reputation of consumers. Consumer reporting agencies have assumed a vital role in assembling and evaluating consumer credit and other information on consumers. There is a need to insure that consumer reporting agencies exercise their grave responsibilities with fairness, impartiality, and a respect for the consumer’s right to privacy.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 3,711 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Courts cite 1681(a)'s findings for the Act's purpose and decide under its operative sections. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins (2016) held that a bare procedural FCRA violation divorced from concrete harm does not satisfy Article III, and TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez (2021) applied that rule to hold 6,332 class members lacked standing.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins (Supreme Court of the United States 2016, 578 U.S. 330)✓Robins alleged Spokeo's people-search profile carried false information about him and sued under the FCRA, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.; the Court held a bare procedural violation divorced from concrete harm does not satisfy Article III injury in fact, and remanded.
- TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez (Supreme Court of the United States 2021, 594 U.S. 413)✓TransUnion flagged 8,185 consumers as potential matches to a Treasury terrorist list; suing under the FCRA, only the 1,853 whose misleading reports actually reached third parties were held concretely harmed, so the other 6,332 lacked Article III standing for damages.
- Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2010, 605 F.3d 665)✓Police had Pintos's car towed and the towing company transferred its deficiency claim to a collection agency, which pulled her Experian report; the Ninth Circuit held § 1681b(a)(3)(A) gave no permissible purpose, since neither credit she sought nor a judgment debt was involved.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Background Check Laws by State (2026 Guide), Employee Data Privacy: Employer Obligations by State (2026), How to Opt Out of Data Brokers (2026)
Explore the law
The laws cited above reference these related sections in their own text:
- Michigan Compiled Laws § 750.145d — Use of internet or computer system; prohibited conduct; violation; penalty; jurisdiction; order to reimburse state or local governmental unit; definitions view in our statute record · read at the official source
- Michigan Compiled Laws § 750.448 — Soliciting, accosting, or inviting to commit prostitution or immoral act; crime view in our statute record · read at the official source
- Michigan Compiled Laws § 750.520b — Criminal sexual conduct in the first degree; circumstances; felony; consecutive terms view in our statute record · read at the official source
- Michigan Compiled Laws § 750.520c — Criminal sexual conduct in the second degree; felony view in our statute record · read at the official source
- Michigan Compiled Laws § 750.520d — Criminal sexual conduct in the third degree; felony view in our statute record · read at the official source
- Michigan Compiled Laws § 750.520e — Criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree; misdemeanor view in our statute record · read at the official source
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Michigan State Police - Criminal History Records (ICHAT)(michigan.gov).gov
- MCL 780.621 - Clean Slate Act(legislature.mi.gov).gov
- Michigan Attorney General - Automatic Expungements(michigan.gov).gov
- Michigan Attorney General - Expungement Assistance(michigan.gov).gov
- Michigan State Police - Clean Slate Information(michigan.gov).gov
- Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act(legislature.mi.gov).gov
- Michigan LARA - Workforce Background Check(michigan.gov).gov
- Michigan Sex Offender Registry (SORA)(michigan.gov).gov
- FTC - Using Consumer Reports: What Employers Need to Know(ftc.gov).gov
- Detroit Fair Chance Ordinance Overview(detroitmi.gov).gov
- Michigan Courts - Clean Slate Special Initiative(courts.michigan.gov).gov
- Executive Directive 2018-4 - Outside the Box(michigan.gov).gov
- Michigan Legislature - MCL 780.621c (Expungement Eligibility)(legislature.mi.gov).gov
- Michigan Attorney General - Expungement FAQs(michigan.gov).gov
- Michigan Legislature - MCL 423.501 (Bullard-Plawecki Act)(legislature.mi.gov).gov
- MCL 123.1384 - Local Government Labor Regulatory Limitation Act (preemption of local hiring-inquiry ordinances)(legislature.mi.gov)
- MCL 37.2205a - Misdemeanor arrest records without conviction(legislature.mi.gov)
- MCL 37.2202 - Elliott-Larsen employer prohibited practices(legislature.mi.gov)
- MCL 37.2502 - Elliott-Larsen real estate transactions, including source of income(legislature.mi.gov)
- Michigan House Bill 5605 of 2024 - reusable screening reports (not enacted)(legislature.mi.gov)
- City of Detroit CRIO - Fair Chance Access to Rental Housing (Detroit City Code Sec. 26-5-1) notice to landlords and tenants(detroitmi.gov)